A Revised History of Fort Floyd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JUNE 1962 The
THE MORNINGSIDERis the official alumni publ- ication of Morningside College, Sioux City, Iowa JUNE 1962 The President's Pen The North Iowa Annual Conference has just closed its 106th session. On the Cover Probably the most significant action of the Conference related to Morningside and Cornell. Ray Toothaker '03, as Medicine Man Greathealer, The Conference approved the plans for the pro raises his arms in supplication as he intones the chant. posed Conference-wide campaign, which will be conducted in 1963 for the amount of $1,500,000.00, "O Wakonda, Great Spirit of the Sioux, brood to be divided equally between the two colleges over this our annual council." and used by them in capital, or building programs. For 41 years, Mr. Toothaker lhas played the part of Greathealer in the ceremony initiating seniors into The Henry Meyer & Associates firm was em the "Tribe of the Sioux". ployed to direct the campaign. The cover picture was taken in one of the gardens Our own alumnus, Eddie McCracken, who is at Friendship Haven in Fort Dodge, Iowa, where Ray co-chairman of the committee directing the cam resides. Long a highly esteemed nurseryman in Sioux paign, was present at the Conference during the City, he laid out the gardens at Friendship Haven, first three critical days and did much in his work plans the arrangements and supervises their care. among laymen and ministers to assure their con His knowledge and love of trees, shrubs and flowers fidence in the program. He presented the official seems unlimited. It is a high privilege to walk in a statement to the Conference for action and spoke garden with him. -
Cumulative Index North Dakota Historical Quarterly Volumes 1-11 1926 - 1944
CUMULATIVE INDEX NORTH DAKOTA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY VOLUMES 1-11 1926 - 1944 A Aiton, Arthur S., review by, 6:245 Alaska, purchase of, 6:6, 7, 15 A’Rafting on the Mississipp’ (Russell), rev. of, 3:220- 222 Albanel, Father Charles, 5:200 A-wach-ha-wa village, of the Hidatsas, 2:5, 6 Albert Lea, Minn., 1.3:25 Abandonment of the military posts, question of, Albrecht, Fred, 2:143 5:248, 249 Alderman, John, 1.1:72 Abbey Lake, 1.3:38 Aldrich, Bess Streeter, rev. of, 3:152-153; Richard, Abbott, Johnston, rev. of, 3:218-219; Lawrence, speaker, 1.1:52 speaker, 1.1:50 Aldrich, Vernice M., articles by, 1.1:49-54, 1.4:41- Abe Collins Ranch, 8:298 45; 2:30-52, 217-219; reviews by, 1.1:69-70, Abell, E. R, 2:109, 111, 113; 3:176; 9:74 1.1:70-71, 1.2:76-77, 1.2:77, 1.3:78, 1.3:78-79, Abercrombie, N.Dak., 1.3: 34, 39; 1.4:6, 7, 71; 2:54, 1.3:79, 1.3:80, 1.4:77, 1.4:77-78; 2:230, 230- 106, 251, 255; 3:173 231, 231, 231-232, 232-233, 274; 3:77, 150, Abercrombie State Park, 4:57 150-151, 151-152, 152, 152-153, 220-222, 223, Aberdeen, D.T., 1.3:57, 4:94, 96 223-224; 4:66, 66-67, 67, 148, 200, 200, 201, Abraham Lincoln, the Prairie Years (Sandburg), rev. of, 201, 202, 202, 274, 275, 275-276, 276, 277-278; 1.2:77 8:220-221; 10:208; 11:221, 221-222 Abstracts in History from Dissertations for the Degree of Alexander, Dr. -
Status of Mineral Resource Information for the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, North Dakota
STATUS OF MINERAL RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN RESERVATION, NORTH DAKOTA By Bradford B. Williams Mary E. Bluemle U.S. Bureau of Mines N. Dak. Geological Survey Administrative report BIA-40 1978 CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 Area Location and Access .................................................... 1 Past Investigations .......................................................... 2 Present Study and Acknowledgments ........................................... 2 Land Status................................................................ 2 Physiography .............................................................. 3 GEOLOGY ..................................................................... 4 Stratigraphy ............................................................... 4 Subsurface .......................................................... 4 Surface ............................................................. 4 General ....................................................... 4 Bullion Creek and Sentinel Butte Formations ......................... 8 Golden Valley Formation......................................... 9 Cole Harbor Formation .......................................... 9 Structure................................................................. 10 MINERAL RESOURCES ......................................................... 11 General ................................................................. -
Qlocation of Legal Description Courthouse
Form NO to-30o <R«V 10-74) 6a2 « Great Explorers of the West: Lewis and Clark Expedition, 1804-6 UNITtDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF THt INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Sergeant Floyd Monument AND/OR COMMON Sergeant Floyd Monument LOCATION STREET & NUMBER Glenn Avenue and Louis Road —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Sioux City _J£VICINITY OF 006 faixthl STATE CODE COUNTY CODE 19 Woodbury 193 {{CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X_puBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILD ING<S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _?PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE XSITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED -3PES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: j ' m OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME (jSioux City Municipal Government) Mr. Paul Morris, Director Parks and Recreatl STREET & NUMBER Box 447, City Hall CITY. TOWN STATI Sioux City _ VICINITY OF Iowa 51102 QLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC Wbodbury County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Sioux City Iowa REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic Sites Survey DATE 1955 X.FEDERAL .....STATE _COUNTY ....LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Historic Sites Survey, 1100 L . Street, NW. CITY. TOWN Washington DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE JCGOOD (surrounding RUINS .XALTERED MOVED DATE 1857 _FAIR area) _ UNEXPOSED x eroded x destroyed DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Sergeant Charles Floyd died August 20, 1804 and was buried on a bluff over looking the Missouri River from its northern bank. -
Lewis and Clark Trust a Friends Group for the Trail
JUNE 2013 A NEWSLETTER OF LEWIS anD CLARK NATIOnaL HISTORIC TRAIL Effective Wayshowing Pgs. 4-6 From the Superintendent Where is the Trail? What is the Trail? want to know. But then there are those who want to know exactly where the trail is…meaning where is the path that Lewis and Clark walked on to the Pacific? This is not such an easy question to answer. Part of the difficulty with this question is that with few exceptions we do not really know exactly where they walked. In many cases, some members of the expedition were Mark Weekley, Superintendent on the river in watercraft while others were on land at the same time. This question One of the interesting questions I get from is also problematic because it is often time to time is, “Where is the Trail?” This based in a lack of understanding of what a seems like an easy enough question to National Historic Trail is and how the Lewis answer. My first instinct is to hand someone and Clark expedition moved through the our brochure with a map of the trail on landscape. Some folks have an image of the back, or to simply say the trail runs Lewis and Clark walking down a path single from Wood River, Illinois, to the mouth of file with Sacajawea leading the way. To them the Columbia River on the Oregon Coast. it would seem that the National Historic Sometimes this seems to be all people Trail would be a narrow path which is well 2 defined. If a building or road has been built This raises the obvious question, “What is in this location then “the trail” is gone. -
Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation
MANDAN, HIDATSA & ARIKARA NATION Three Affiliated Tribes * Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Mark N. Fox Office of the Chairman U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies March 6, 2019 Good morning Chairwoman McCollum and Members of the Subcommittee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify on the appropriations priorities of the Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation (MHA Nation). My name is Monica Mayer. I am an elected member of the MHA Nation Tribal Business Council. I also have 20 years experience as a family physician and health services administrator. Our testimony for FY 2020 is focused on the Indian Health Service (IHS) and Federal programs supporting Indian infrastructure within the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and other federal agencies. Indian Heath Service Funding Must Be Based on Actual Need and Forward Funded Nothing is more important to the MHA Nation than the health of our people. Our tribal enrollment is around 16,250. About 90 percent of our members have visited one or more of our health programs at least once. The MHA Nation operates four field clinics and one large primary clinic called the Elbowoods Memorial Health Center. We also operate a dental facility and a diabetes wellness center. Unfortunately, the Indian Health Service (IHS) budget process is based on historic funding levels and not a sound assessment of actual need. IHS budgets are almost always driven by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which incorrectly assumes that historic funding levels were adequate. They were not. As a result, the Subcommittee is left working with a proposed budget that everyone knows is wholly inadequate. -
Field Notes7-2007#23.Pub
July 2007 Wisconsin’s Chapter ~ Interested & Involved Number 23 During this time in history: (July 4th, 1804/05/06) (The source for all Journal entries is, "The Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedi- tion edited by Gary E. Moulton, The Uni- versity of Nebraska Press, 1983-2001.) By: Jack Schroeder July 4, 1804, (near today’s Atchison, Kan- sas) Clark: “Ushered in the day by a dis- charge of one shot from our bow piece, A worthwhile tradition was re- th proceeded on…Passed a creek 12 yards invigorated Saturday June 16 when wide…as this creek has no name, and this the Badger Chapter held a picnic for th being the 4 of July, the day of the inde- about 30 members and guests at the pendence of the U.S., we call it Independ- ence Creek…We closed the day by a dis- Horicon Marsh Environmental Educa- charge from our bow piece, an extra gill tion Barn. The location was widely of whiskey.” approved for the coolness of the inte- rior, the rustic feel of the stone walls, July 4, 1805, (at the Great Falls, Montana) Lewis: “Our work being at an end this and the sweeping view of the marsh. evening, (most men were working on the iron boat) we gave the men a drink of The potluck lunch featured four au- spirits, it being the last of our stock, and thentic Lewis and Clark recipes in- some of them appeared a little sensible of cluding a couple of bison dishes. The it’s effects. The fiddle was plied and they danced very merrily until 9 in the evening highlight of the meal was the two ta- when a heavy shower of rain put an end to bles groaning under the weight of that part of the amusement, though they dozens of excellent salads and des- continued their mirth with songs and fes- serts. -
Tcus As Engaged Institutions
Building Strong Communities Tribal Colleges as Engaged Institutions Prepared by: American Indian Higher Education Consortium & The Institute for Higher Education Policy A product of the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative Building Strong Communities: Tribal Colleges as Engaged Institutions APRIL 2001 American Indian Higher Education Consortium The Institute for Higher Education Policy A product of the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative, a collaborative effort between the American Indian Higher Education Consortium and the American Indian College Fund ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the fourth in a series of policy reports produced through the Tribal College Research and Database Initiative. The Initiative is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Native Ameri- cans (ANA) and the Pew Charitable Trusts. A collaborative effort between the American Indian Higher Education Consor- tium (AIHEC) and the American Indian College Fund, the project is a multi-year effort to improve understanding of Tribal Colleges. AIHEC would also like to thank the W.K. Kellogg Foundation for its continued support. This report was prepared by Alisa Federico Cunningham, Senior Research Analyst, and Christina Redmond, Research Assis- tant, at The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Jamie Merisotis, President, Colleen O’Brien, Vice President, and Deanna High, Project Editor, at The Institute, as well as Veronica Gonzales, Jeff Hamley, and Sara Pena at AIHEC, provided writing and editorial assistance. We also would like to acknowledge the individuals and organizations who offered information, advice, and feedback for the report. In particular, we would like to thank the many Tribal College presidents who read earlier drafts of the report and offered essential feedback and information. -
Lewis & Clark Timeline
LEWIS & CLARK TIMELINE The following time line provides an overview of the incredible journey of the Lewis & Clark Expedition. Beginning with preparations for the journey in 1803, it highlights the Expedition’s exploration of the west and concludes with its return to St. Louis in 1806. For a more detailed time line, please see www.monticello.org and follow the Lewis & Clark links. 1803 JANUARY 18, 1803 JULY 6, 1803 President Thomas Jefferson sends a secret letter to Lewis stops in Harpers Ferry (in present-day West Virginia) Congress asking for $2,500 to finance an expedition to and purchases supplies and equipment. explore the Missouri River. The funding is approved JULY–AUGUST, 1803 February 28. Lewis spends over a month in Pittsburgh overseeing APRIL–MAY, 1803 construction of a 55-foot keelboat. He and 11 men head Meriwether Lewis is sent to Philadelphia to be tutored down the Ohio River on August 31. by some of the nation’s leading scientists (including OCTOBER 14, 1803 Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Smith Barton, Robert Patterson, and Caspar Wistar). He also purchases supplies that will Lewis arrives at Clarksville, across the Ohio River from be needed on the journey. present-day Louisville, Kentucky, and soon meets up with William Clark. Clark’s African-American slave York JULY 4, 1803 and nine men from Kentucky are added to the party. The United States’s purchase of the 820,000-square mile DECEMBER 8–9, 1803 Louisiana territory from France for $15 million is announced. Lewis leaves Washington the next day. Lewis and Clark arrive in St. -
The Hidatsa Water Buster (Midi Badi) Clan Negotiates the Return of a Medicine Bundle from the Museum of the American Indian in 1938
arts Article Trusting You Will See This as We Do: The Hidatsa Water Buster (Midi Badi) Clan Negotiates the Return of a Medicine Bundle from the Museum of the American Indian in 1938 Jennifer Shannon Department of Anthropology and Museum of Natural History, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-492-6276 Received: 21 August 2019; Accepted: 19 November 2019; Published: 26 November 2019 Abstract: An often cited 1938 repatriation from the Museum of the American Indian in New York City to the members of the Water Buster or Midi Badi clan of the Hidatsa tribe in North Dakota is revisited. Rather than focusing on this event as a “first” in repatriation history or using it as a character assessment of the director of the museum, this account highlights the clan’s agency and resistance through an examination of their negotiation for the return of a sacred bundle and the objects they selected to provide in exchange. Through this example, we see how tribes have had to make hard choices in hard times, and how repatriation is a form of resistance and redress that contributes to the future of a community’s wellbeing in the face of a history of religious and colonial oppression. Keywords: repatriation; cultural patrimony; Native Americans; museums; Hidatsa; Mandan Hidatsa Arikara Nation; Three Affiliated Tribes; National Museum of the American Indian; Museum of the American Indian; George Gustav Heye Trusting that you will see this in the same light as we do and decide to co-operate with us for the return of the Sacred Bundle. -
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 176
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 176 River Basin Surveys Papers, No. 15 Historic Sites Archeology on the Upper Missouri By MERRILL J. MATTES CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 5 The Missouri Basin 7 The National Park Service and the Missouri Basin 9 Historic sites investigations 13 Literature cited 20 3 HISTORIC SITES ARCHEOLOGY ON THE UPPER MISSOURI ' By Mekrill J. JVIattes ^ INTKODUCTION The Flood Control Act of 1944 laid the groundwork for a compre- hensive water-control plan for the Missouri River Basin, involving the survey of over 100 potential reservoir sites, and the early creation of several of these reservoirs by the Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation. The construction of large dams, inundating extensive river valleys, posed a grave threat to important historical and archeo- logical values quickly recognized by two other Government agencies which have primary responsibilities in these fields—the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior, and the Smithsonian Institution. Under the aggressive leadership of chief historian R. F. Lee and assistant chief historian Herbert E. Kahler, of the National Park Service, and Dr. Frank H. H. Roberts, Jr., of the Bureau of American Ethnology, a program was launched for the sur- vey and salvage of archeological sites threatened or doomed by the prospect of inundation (Corbett, 1949; Johnson, 1951; Mattes, 1947; Roberts, 1952). Conceived in 1945, the program was actually implemented in 1946 when a field office of the Smithsonian Institution was set up at the Laboratory of Anthropology of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, and the positions of historian and liaison archeologist were set up by the National Park Service at its Region Two Office in Omaha (Wedel, 1947) . -
The Impact of Oil and Gas Development on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation
DEVELOPMENT’S VICTIM OR ITS BENEFICIARY?: THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT ON THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN RESERVATION RAYMOND CROSS* “With an education, you become the white man’s equal. Without it you remain his victim.”—1 Crow Chief, Plenty Coups I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 536 II. WHY DEVELOPMENT IS DIFFERENT ON THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN RESERVATION ................................... 541 A. THE TRIBAL PEOPLE’S UNBREAKABLE GEOGRAPHIC TIES TO THE FORT BERTHOLD INDIAN RESERVATION ................ 542 1. Their Treaty-Based Geographic Ties to Fort Berthold .. 543 2. Their Territorially-Based Rights of Sovereignty Within Fort Berthold .................................................................. 544 3. Their Socio-Cultural Ties to Fort Berthold .................... 545 B. FORT BERTHOLD’S LEGALLY-BASED DIFFERENCES FROM THE REST OF NORTH DAKOTA ............................................. 546 III. THE TRIBE’S THREE BIG CHALLENGES ............................ 548 A. HOW THE THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES CAN MEET ITS LEGAL CHALLENGE ............................................................. 550 1. Overview ........................................................................ 550 2. Analysis of the Tribe’s Regulatory Authority over Development on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation . 551 3. How the Three Affiliated Tribes Can Leverage Its Authority to Regulate Development Throughout the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation .................................. 552 * Professor of Law, University of Montana School of Law. J.D., Yale Law School, 1973; M.P.A., Harvard University, 1989; B.A. Stanford University, 1970. 1. Douglas Nelson & Jeremy Johnston, Janine Pease Pretty-on-Top/Crow, in THE NEW WARRIORS: NATIVE AMERICANS LEADERS SINCE 1900 (R. David Edmunds ed. 2004). 536 NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW [VOL. 87:535 4. How the Tribe Can Use Its Inherent and Federally Delegated Authority to Regulate Development on the Fee Status Lands Within the Reservation ....................... 553 B.