DOCSLIB.ORG

Discrete Groups and Riemann Surfaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discrete Groups and Riemann Surfaces Discrete Groups and Riemann Surfaces Anthony Weaver July 6, 2013 Abstract These notes summarize four expository lectures delivered at the Ad- vanced School of the ICTS Program Groups, Geometry and Dynamics, De- cember, 2012, Almora, India. The target audience was a group of students at or near the end of a traditional undergraduate math major. My purpose was to expose the types of discrete groups that arise in connection with Riemann surfaces. I have not hesitated to shorten or omit proofs, espe- cially in the later sections, where I thought completeness would interrupt the narrative flow. References and a guide to the literature are provided for the reader who demands all the details. Contents 1 Prerequisites 2 2 Riemann surfaces 2 2.1 The Riemann sphere . 3 2.2 The graph of an analytic function . 3 2.3 Smooth affine plane curves . 3 2.4 Smooth projective plane curves . 4 3 Holomorphic maps 5 3.1 Automorphisms . 6 3.2 Meromorphic functions . 6 3.3 The local normal form . 7 3.4 The Riemann-Hurwitz relation . 8 3.5 Fermat curves . 9 3.6 Cyclic covers of the line . 10 3.7 Resolving singularities . 10 4 Galois groups 12 4.1 The monodromy group . 12 4.2 Two permutation groups . 14 4.3 Galois coverings . 15 1 4.4 A presentation for the Galois group . 16 4.5 The dihedral group as a Galois group . 17 4.6 Galois coverings of the line . 18 4.7 The Galois extension problem . 18 5 Uniformization 19 5.1 The Dirichlet region . 21 5.2 Surface groups . 25 5.3 Triangle groups . 25 5.4 Automorphisms via uniformization . 26 5.5 Surface-kernel epimorphisms . 27 5.6 Topological conjugacy . 28 5.7 Teichmüller spaces . 28 6 Greenberg-Singerman extensions 30 6.1 Generalized Lefschetz curves . 33 6.2 Accola-Maclachlan and Kulkarni curves . 35 7 Further reading 35 1 Prerequisites To progress beyond the definition of a Riemann surface, one needs to know a little bit about a lot of things. Accordingly, here are the prerequisites necessary to begin these notes. (i) Complex analysis: analytic functions, conformal map- pings, Taylor series as in [4]. (ii) Topology: open sets, homeomorphisms, open mappings, the fundamental group, covering spaces as in [28]. (iii) Groups and group actions: permutation groups, normal subgroups, factor groups, isotropy subgroups, group presentations as in [38]. (iv) Hyperbolic geometry: the up- per half plane and disk models, the Gauss-Bonnet theorem as in [6]. We start from this broad baseline. I give a brief guide to further reading in the final section, for those readers whose appetite has been whetted by these brief notes. 2 Riemann surfaces A Riemann surface is an abstract object that, locally, looks like an open subset of the complex plane C. This means one can do complex analysis in a neigh- borhood of any point. Globally, a Riemann surface may be very different from C, however. For example, it could be compact, and it need not be simply con- nected. Here is the technical definition. Definition 1. A Riemann surface X is a second-countable, connected, Haus- dorff space with an atlas of charts, φ : U V , where U , V are open ↵ ↵ ! ↵ ↵ ↵ 2 subsets of X, C, respectively, and φ↵ is a homeomorphism. For every pair of charts φ↵, φβ with overlapping domains, the transition map, 1 φ φ− : φ (U U ) φ (U U ) β ◦ ↵ ↵ ↵ \ β ! β ↵ \ β is bianalytic, that is, analytic with analytic inverse. Some basic examples follow. 2.1 The Riemann sphere A two-chart atlas on S2 = (x, y, w) R3 x2 + y2 + w2 =1 is given by { 2 | } stereographic projection from the north and south poles: 2 x y φ1 : S (0, 0, 1) C, (x, y, w) + i \ ! 7! 1 w 1 w − − 2 x y φ2 : S (0, 0, 1) C, (x, y, w) i . \ − ! 7! 1+w − 1+w The inverses of these maps are 2 1 2Re(z) 2Im(z) z 1 φ− (z)= , , | | − 1 z 2 +1 z 2 +1 z 2 +1 ✓ ◆ | | | | | | 2 1 2Re(z) 2Im(z) 1 z φ− (z)= , − , −| | . 2 z 2 +1 z 2 +1 z 2 +1 ✓| | | | | | ◆ 1 The transition map φ φ− is simply z 1/z. 2 ◦ 1 7! 2.2 The graph of an analytic function For an analytic function w = g(z) whose domain contains the open set U C, 2 ✓ the graph (z,g(z)) z U C , with the single chart ⇡z :(z,g(z)) z, is a { | 2 }✓ 7! Riemann surface. 2.3 Smooth affine plane curves Definition 2. An affine plane curve X is the zero locus of a polynomial f(z,w) 2 C[z,w]. It is non-singular or smooth if, for all p =(a, b) X, the partial deriva- 2 tives fz(p) and fw(p) are not simultaneously zero. By the implicit function theorem, in a neighborhood of every point p on a smooth affine plane curve, at least one of the coordinates z,w is an analytic function of the other, depending on which partial derivative is =0. If f (p) = 6 w 6 0, there is an open set U containing p such that, for all q =(z,w) U, w = g(z), 2 an analytic function of z. Thus ⇡z : U C is a local chart. If, also, fz(p) =0, ! 6 there is an open set V containing p such that, for all q =(z,w) V , z = h(w), 2 3 an analytic function of w. Then ⇡w : V C is also a local chart. The transition ! functions, 1 ⇡ ⇡− : z g(z) w ◦ z 7! 1 ⇡ ⇡− : w h(w), z ◦ w 7! defined on ⇡ (U V ) and ⇡ (U V ), respectively, are, by construction, analytic. z \ w \ Thus a smooth affine plane curve, if connected, is a Riemann surface. Remark 1. Connectivity can be guaranteed by assuming the polynomial f(z,w) is irreducible, that is, not factorable into terms of positive degree. This is a stan- dard result in algebraic geometry which is beyond the scope of this paper. See [36]. 2.4 Smooth projective plane curves The one-dimensional subspaces of the vector space C3 are the ‘points’ of the complex projective plane P2. The span of (x, y, z) C3, (x, y, z) =(0, 0, 0), is 2 6 denoted [x : y : z]. For λ C, λ =0, 2 6 [x : y : z]=[λx : λy : λz]. x, y and z are homogeneous coordinates on P2: being defined only up to a com- mon scalar multiple, no coordinate takes on any "special" or fixed value. P2 is a complex manifold of dimension 2, covered by three sets, defined by x =0, 6 y =0, z =0, respectively. In homogenous coordinates, we may assume that 6 6 x 2 + y 2 + z 2 =1; in particular, that x , y , z 1. Thus P2 is compact. | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 Definition 3. A polynomial F (x, y, z) C is homogeneous if, for every λ C⇤, 2 2 F (λx, λy,λz)=λdF (x, y, z), where d is the degree of the polynomial. On P2, the value of a homogeneous polynomial F (x, y, z) is not well-defined, but the zero locus is. Definition 4. A projective plane curve X is the zero locus in P2 of a homogeneous polynomial F (x, y, z) C[x, y, z]. It is non-singular (smooth) if, there is no point 2 p =[x : y : z] X, at which all three partial derivatives @ F (p), @ F (p), and 2 x y @zF (p) vanish simultaneously. An affine plane curve f(x, y)=0can be “projectivized" (and thereby, com- pactified) by the following procedure: multiply each term of the defining poly- nomial f by a suitable power of a new variable z so that all terms have the same (minimal) degree. Then the affine portion of the projectivized curve corresponds to z =1, and the points at infinity correspond to z =0. Theorem 1. A nonsingular projective plane curve is a compact Riemann surface. 2 Proof. Let Ui = [x0 : x1 : x2] P xi =0 , i =0, 1, 2. (Up to a nonzero scalar { ✓ | 6 } factor, x =0is equivalent to x =1.) Let X be a smooth projective plane curve i 6 i 4 defined as the zero locus of the homogenous polynomial F (x0,x1,x2), and let X = X U . Each X is an affine plane curve, e.g., i \ i i 2 X0 = (a, b) C F (1,a,b)=0 . { 2 | } For a homogeneous polynomial F of degree d, 1 k F (x ,x ,...x )= x @ F. 0 1 k d i i i=0 X This is known as Euler’s formula, and it implies (exercise) that X is nonsin- gular if and only if each Xi is a smooth affine plane curve. Coordinate charts on Xi are ratios of homogeneous coordinates on X, and as such they are well- defined. For example, charts on X0 are x1/x0 or x2/x0, and charts on X2 are x0/x2 or x1/x2. Transition functions are readily seen to be holomorphic, e.g., near p X X , where x ,x =0, let z = φ = x /x and w = φ = x /x . 2 0 \ 1 0 1 6 1 1 0 2 2 1 Then 1 h(z) φ φ− : z [1 : z : h(z)] = w, 2 ◦ 1 7! 7! z where h(z) is a holomorphic function, and z =0, since p X . Connectivity is 6 2 1 required to make Xi (and hence X) a Riemann surface.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Möbius Transformations
    Möbius transformations Möbius transformations are simply the degree one rational maps of C: az + b σ : z 7! : ! A cz + d C C where ad − bc 6= 0 and a b A = c d Then A 7! σA : GL(2C) ! fMobius transformations g is a homomorphism whose kernel is ∗ fλI : λ 2 C g: The homomorphism is an isomorphism restricted to SL(2; C), the subgroup of matri- ces of determinant 1. We have an action of GL(2; C) on C by A:(B:z) = (AB):z; A; B 2 GL(2; C); z 2 C: The action of SL(2; R) preserves the upper half-plane fz 2 C : Im(z) > 0g and also R [ f1g and the lower half-plane. The action of the subgroup a b SU(1; 1) = : jaj2 − jbj2 = 1 b a preserves the open unit disc, the closed unit disc, and its exterior. All of these actions are transitive that is, for all z and w in the domain there is A in the group with A:z = w. Kleinian groups Definition 1 A Kleinian group is a subgroup Γ of P SL(2; C) which is discrete, that is, there is an open neighbourhood U ⊂ P SL(2; C) of the identity element I such that U \ Γ = fIg: Definition 2 A Fuchsian group is a discrete subgroup of P SL(2; R) Equivalently (as usual with topological groups) there is an open neighbourhood V of I such that γV \ γ0V = ; for all γ, γ0 2 Γ, γ 6= γ0. To get this, choose V with V = V −1 and V:V ⊂ U.
    [Show full text]
  • On Discrete Generalised Triangle Groups
    Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society (1995) 38, 397-412 © ON DISCRETE GENERALISED TRIANGLE GROUPS by M. HAGELBERG, C. MACLACHLAN and G. ROSENBERGER (Received 29th October 1993) A generalised triangle group has a presentation of the form where R is a cyclically reduced word involving both x and y. When R=xy, these classical triangle groups have representations as discrete groups of isometries of S2, R2, H2 depending on In this paper, for other words R, faithful discrete representations of these groups in Isom + H3 = PSL(2,C) are considered with particular emphasis on the case /? = [x, y] and also on the relationship between the Euler characteristic x and finite covolume representations. 1991 Mathematics subject classification: 20H15. 1. Introduction In this article, we consider generalised triangle groups, i.e. groups F with a presentation of the form where R(x,y) is a cyclically reduced word in the free product on x,y which involves both x and y. These groups have been studied for their group theoretical interest [8, 7, 13], for topological reasons [2], and more recently for their connections with hyperbolic 3-manifolds and orbifolds [12, 10]. Here we will be concerned with faithful discrete representations p:T-*PSL(2,C) with particular emphasis on the cases where the Kleinian group p(F) has finite covolume. In Theorem 3.2, we give necessary conditions on the group F so that it should admit such a faithful discrete representation of finite covolume. For certain generalised triangle groups where the word R(x,y) has a specified form, faithful discrete representations as above have been constructed by Helling-Mennicke- Vinberg [12] and by the first author [11].
    [Show full text]
  • Riemann Surfaces
    RIEMANN SURFACES AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Maps of Riemann Surfaces 4 2.1. Defining the maps 4 2.2. The multiplicity of a map 4 2.3. Ramification Loci of maps 6 2.4. Applications 6 3. Properness 9 3.1. Definition of properness 9 3.2. Basic properties of proper morphisms 9 3.3. Constancy of degree of a map 10 4. Examples of Proper Maps of Riemann Surfaces 13 5. Riemann-Hurwitz 15 5.1. Statement of Riemann-Hurwitz 15 5.2. Applications 15 6. Automorphisms of Riemann Surfaces of genus ≥ 2 18 6.1. Statement of the bound 18 6.2. Proving the bound 18 6.3. We rule out g(Y) > 1 20 6.4. We rule out g(Y) = 1 20 6.5. We rule out g(Y) = 0, n ≥ 5 20 6.6. We rule out g(Y) = 0, n = 4 20 6.7. We rule out g(C0) = 0, n = 3 20 6.8. 21 7. Automorphisms in low genus 0 and 1 22 7.1. Genus 0 22 7.2. Genus 1 22 7.3. Example in Genus 3 23 Appendix A. Proof of Riemann Hurwitz 25 Appendix B. Quotients of Riemann surfaces by automorphisms 29 References 31 1 2 AARON LANDESMAN 1. INTRODUCTION In this course, we’ll discuss the theory of Riemann surfaces. Rie- mann surfaces are a beautiful breeding ground for ideas from many areas of math. In this way they connect seemingly disjoint fields, and also allow one to use tools from different areas of math to study them.
    [Show full text]
  • Handlebody Orbifolds and Schottky Uniformizations of Hyperbolic 2-Orbifolds
    proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 123, Number 12, December 1995 HANDLEBODY ORBIFOLDS AND SCHOTTKY UNIFORMIZATIONS OF HYPERBOLIC 2-ORBIFOLDS MARCO RENI AND BRUNO ZIMMERMANN (Communicated by Ronald J. Stern) Abstract. The retrosection theorem says that any hyperbolic or Riemann sur- face can be uniformized by a Schottky group. We generalize this theorem to the case of hyperbolic 2-orbifolds by giving necessary and sufficient conditions for a hyperbolic 2-orbifold, in terms of its signature, to admit a uniformization by a Kleinian group which is a finite extension of a Schottky group. Equiva- lent^, the conditions characterize those hyperbolic 2-orbifolds which occur as the boundary of a handlebody orbifold, that is, the quotient of a handlebody by a finite group action. 1. Introduction Let F be a Fuchsian group, that is a discrete group of Möbius transforma- tions—or equivalently, hyperbolic isometries—acting on the upper half space or the interior of the unit disk H2 (Poincaré model of the hyperbolic plane). We shall always assume that F has compact quotient tf = H2/F which is a hyperbolic 2-orbifold with signature (g;nx,...,nr); here g denotes the genus of the quotient which is a closed orientable surface, and nx, ... , nr are the orders of the branch points (the singular set of the orbifold) of the branched covering H2 -» H2/F. Then also F has signature (g;nx,... , nr), and (2 - 2g - £-=1(l - 1/«/)) < 0 (see [12] resp. [15] for information about orbifolds resp. Fuchsian groups). In case r — 0, or equivalently, if the Fuch- sian group F is without torsion, the quotient H2/F is a hyperbolic or Riemann surface without branch points.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/0306105V2
    A bound for the number of automorphisms of an arithmetic Riemann surface BY MIKHAIL BELOLIPETSKY Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia e-mail: [email protected] AND GARETH A. JONES Faculty of Mathematical Studies, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ e-mail: [email protected] Abstract We show that for every g ≥ 2 there is a compact arithmetic Riemann surface of genus g with at least 4(g − 1) automorphisms, and that this lower bound is attained by infinitely many genera, the smallest being 24. 1. Introduction Schwarz [17] proved that the automorphism group of a compact Riemann surface of genus g ≥ 2 is finite, and Hurwitz [10] showed that its order is at most 84(g − 1). This bound is sharp, by which we mean that it is attained for infinitely many g, and the least genus of such an extremal surface is 3. However, it is also well known that there are infinitely many genera for which the bound 84(g − 1) is not attained. It therefore makes sense to consider the maximal order N(g) of the group of automorphisms of any Riemann surface of genus g. Accola [1] and Maclachlan [14] independently proved that N(g) ≥ 8(g +1). This bound is also sharp, and according to p. 93 of [2], Paul Hewitt has shown that the least genus attaining it is 23. Thus we have the following sharp bounds for N(g) with g ≥ 2: 8(g + 1) ≤ N(g) ≤ 84(g − 1). arXiv:math/0306105v2 [math.GR] 21 Nov 2004 We now consider these bounds from an arithmetic point of view, defining arithmetic Riemann surfaces to be those which are uniformized by arithmetic Fuchsian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic Vortex Solutions on Compact Hyperbolic Surfaces
    Analytic vortex solutions on compact hyperbolic surfaces Rafael Maldonado∗ and Nicholas S. Mantony Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, U.K. August 27, 2018 Abstract We construct, for the first time, Abelian-Higgs vortices on certain compact surfaces of constant negative curvature. Such surfaces are represented by a tessellation of the hyperbolic plane by regular polygons. The Higgs field is given implicitly in terms of Schwarz triangle functions and analytic solutions are available for certain highly symmetric configurations. 1 Introduction Consider the Abelian-Higgs field theory on a background surface M with metric ds2 = Ω(x; y)(dx2+dy2). At critical coupling the static energy functional satisfies a Bogomolny bound 2 1 Z B Ω 2 E = + jD Φj2 + 1 − jΦj2 dxdy ≥ πN; (1) 2 2Ω i 2 where the topological invariant N (the `vortex number') is the number of zeros of Φ counted with multiplicity [1]. In the notation of [2] we have taken e2 = τ = 1. Equality in (1) is attained when the fields satisfy the Bogomolny vortex equations, which are obtained by completing the square in (1). In complex coordinates z = x + iy these are 2 Dz¯Φ = 0;B = Ω (1 − jΦj ): (2) This set of equations has smooth vortex solutions. As we explain in section 2, analytical results are most readily obtained when M is hyperbolic, having constant negative cur- vature K = −1, a case which is of interest in its own right due to the relation between arXiv:1502.01990v1 [hep-th] 6 Feb 2015 hyperbolic vortices and SO(3)-invariant instantons, [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry, Fuchsian Groups, and Tiling Spaces
    HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY, FUCHSIAN GROUPS, AND TILING SPACES C. OLIVARES Abstract. Expository paper on hyperbolic geometry and Fuchsian groups. Exposition is based on utilizing the group action of hyperbolic isometries to discover facts about the space across models. Fuchsian groups are character- ized, and applied to construct tilings of hyperbolic space. Contents 1. Introduction1 2. The Origin of Hyperbolic Geometry2 3. The Poincar´eDisk Model of 2D Hyperbolic Space3 3.1. Length in the Poincar´eDisk4 3.2. Groups of Isometries in Hyperbolic Space5 3.3. Hyperbolic Geodesics6 4. The Half-Plane Model of Hyperbolic Space 10 5. The Classification of Hyperbolic Isometries 14 5.1. The Three Classes of Isometries 15 5.2. Hyperbolic Elements 17 5.3. Parabolic Elements 18 5.4. Elliptic Elements 18 6. Fuchsian Groups 19 6.1. Defining Fuchsian Groups 20 6.2. Fuchsian Group Action 20 Acknowledgements 26 References 26 1. Introduction One of the goals of geometry is to characterize what a space \looks like." This task is difficult because a space is just a non-empty set endowed with an axiomatic structure|a list of rules for its points to follow. But, a priori, there is nothing that a list of axioms tells us about the curvature of a space, or what a circle, triangle, or other classical shapes would look like in a space. Moreover, the ways geometry manifests itself vary wildly according to changes in the axioms. As an example, consider the following: There are two spaces, with two different rules. In one space, planets are round, and in the other, planets are flat.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Orbifolds
    An introduction to orbifolds Joan Porti UAB Subdivide and Tile: Triangulating spaces for understanding the world Lorentz Center November 2009 An introduction to orbifolds – p.1/20 Motivation • Γ < Isom(Rn) or Hn discrete and acts properly discontinuously (e.g. a group of symmetries of a tessellation). • If Γ has no fixed points ⇒ Γ\Rn is a manifold. • If Γ has fixed points ⇒ Γ\Rn is an orbifold. An introduction to orbifolds – p.2/20 Motivation • Γ < Isom(Rn) or Hn discrete and acts properly discontinuously (e.g. a group of symmetries of a tessellation). • If Γ has no fixed points ⇒ Γ\Rn is a manifold. • If Γ has fixed points ⇒ Γ\Rn is an orbifold. ··· (there are other notions of orbifold in algebraic geometry, string theory or using grupoids) An introduction to orbifolds – p.2/20 Examples: tessellations of Euclidean plane Γ= h(x, y) → (x + 1, y), (x, y) → (x, y + 1)i =∼ Z2 Γ\R2 =∼ T 2 = S1 × S1 An introduction to orbifolds – p.3/20 Examples: tessellations of Euclidean plane Rotations of angle π around red points (order 2) An introduction to orbifolds – p.3/20 Examples: tessellations of Euclidean plane Rotations of angle π around red points (order 2) 2 2 An introduction to orbifolds – p.3/20 Examples: tessellations of Euclidean plane Rotations of angle π around red points (order 2) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 An introduction to orbifolds – p.3/20 Example: tessellations of hyperbolic plane Rotations of angle π, π/2 and π/3 around vertices (order 2, 4, and 6) An introduction to orbifolds – p.4/20 Example: tessellations of hyperbolic plane Rotations of angle π, π/2 and π/3 around vertices (order 2, 4, and 6) 2 4 2 6 An introduction to orbifolds – p.4/20 Definition Informal Definition • An orbifold O is a metrizable topological space equipped with an atlas modelled on Rn/Γ, Γ < O(n) finite, with some compatibility condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Testing
    Animal Testing Adrian Dumitrescu∗ Evan Hilscher † Abstract an animal A. Let A′ be the animal such that there is a cube at every integer coordinate within the box, i.e., it A configuration of unit cubes in three dimensions with is a solid rectangular box containing the given animal. integer coordinates is called an animal if the boundary The algorithm is as follows: of their union is homeomorphic to a sphere. Shermer ′ discovered several animals from which no single cube 1. Transform A1 to A1 by addition only. ′ ′ may be removed such that the resulting configurations 2. Transform A1 to A2 . are also animals [6]. Here we obtain a dual result: we ′ give an example of an animal to which no cube may 3. Transform A2 to A2 by removal only. be added within its minimal bounding box such that ′ ′ It is easy to see that A1 can be transformed to A2 . the resulting configuration is also an animal. We also ′ We simply add or remove one layer of A1 , one cube O n present a ( )-time algorithm for determining whether at a time. The only question is, can any animal A be n a configuration of unit cubes is an animal. transformed to A′ by addition only? If the answer is yes, Keywords: Animal, polyomino, homeomorphic to a then the third step above is also feasible. As it turns sphere. out, the answer is no, thus our alternative algorithm is also infeasible. 1 Introduction Our results. In Section 2 we present a construction of an animal to which no cube may be added within its An animal is defined as a configuration of axis-aligned minimal bounding box such that the resulting collection unit cubes with integer coordinates in 3-space such of unit cubes is an animal.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentations of Groups Acting Discontinuously on Direct Products of Hyperbolic Spaces
    Presentations of Groups Acting Discontinuously on Direct Products of Hyperbolic Spaces∗ E. Jespers A. Kiefer Á. del Río November 6, 2018 Abstract The problem of describing the group of units U(ZG) of the integral group ring ZG of a finite group G has attracted a lot of attention and providing presentations for such groups is a fundamental problem. Within the context of orders, a central problem is to describe a presentation of the unit group of an order O in the simple epimorphic images A of the rational group algebra QG. Making use of the presentation part of Poincaré’s Polyhedron Theorem, Pita, del Río and Ruiz proposed such a method for a large family of finite groups G and consequently Jespers, Pita, del Río, Ruiz and Zalesskii described the structure of U(ZG) for a large family of finite groups G. In order to handle many more groups, one would like to extend Poincaré’s Method to discontinuous subgroups of the group of isometries of a direct product of hyperbolic spaces. If the algebra A has degree 2 then via the Galois embeddings of the centre of the algebra A one considers the group of reduced norm one elements of the order O as such a group and thus one would obtain a solution to the mentioned problem. This would provide presentations of the unit group of orders in the simple components of degree 2 of QG and in particular describe the unit group of ZG for every group G with irreducible character degrees less than or equal to 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1012.2020V1 [Math.CV]
    TRANSITIVITY ON WEIERSTRASS POINTS ZOË LAING AND DAVID SINGERMAN 1. Introduction An automorphism of a Riemann surface will preserve its set of Weier- strass points. In this paper, we search for Riemann surfaces whose automorphism groups act transitively on the Weierstrass points. One well-known example is Klein’s quartic, which is known to have 24 Weierstrass points permuted transitively by it’s automorphism group, PSL(2, 7) of order 168. An investigation of when Hurwitz groups act transitively has been made by Magaard and Völklein [19]. After a section on the preliminaries, we examine the transitivity property on several classes of surfaces. The easiest case is when the surface is hy- perelliptic, and we find all hyperelliptic surfaces with the transitivity property (there are infinitely many of them). We then consider surfaces with automorphism group PSL(2, q), Weierstrass points of weight 1, and other classes of Riemann surfaces, ending with Fermat curves. Basically, we find that the transitivity property property seems quite rare and that the surfaces we have found with this property are inter- esting for other reasons too. 2. Preliminaries Weierstrass Gap Theorem ([6]). Let X be a compact Riemann sur- face of genus g. Then for each point p ∈ X there are precisely g integers 1 = γ1 < γ2 <...<γg < 2g such that there is no meromor- arXiv:1012.2020v1 [math.CV] 9 Dec 2010 phic function on X whose only pole is one of order γj at p and which is analytic elsewhere. The integers γ1,...,γg are called the gaps at p. The complement of the gaps at p in the natural numbers are called the non-gaps at p.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Domains for Genus-Zero and Genus-One Congruence Subgroups
    LMS J. Comput. Math. 13 (2010) 222{245 C 2010 Author doi:10.1112/S1461157008000041e Fundamental domains for genus-zero and genus-one congruence subgroups C. J. Cummins Abstract In this paper, we compute Ford fundamental domains for all genus-zero and genus-one congruence subgroups. This is a continuation of previous work, which found all such groups, including ones that are not subgroups of PSL(2; Z). To compute these fundamental domains, an algorithm is given that takes the following as its input: a positive square-free integer f, which determines + a maximal discrete subgroup Γ0(f) of SL(2; R); a decision procedure to determine whether a + + given element of Γ0(f) is in a subgroup G; and the index of G in Γ0(f) . The output consists of: a fundamental domain for G, a finite set of bounding isometric circles; the cycles of the vertices of this fundamental domain; and a set of generators of G. The algorithm avoids the use of floating-point approximations. It applies, in principle, to any group commensurable with the modular group. Included as appendices are: MAGMA source code implementing the algorithm; data files, computed in a previous paper, which are used as input to compute the fundamental domains; the data computed by the algorithm for each of the congruence subgroups of genus zero and genus one; and an example, which computes the fundamental domain of a non-congruence subgroup. 1. Introduction The modular group PSL(2; Z) := SL(2; Z)={±12g is a discrete subgroup of PSL(2; R) := SL(2; R)={±12g.
    [Show full text]