Upper West River Basin Water Quality Management Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Upper Connecticut River Aquatic Habitat Connectivity: White River Watershed
Upper Connecticut River Aquatic Habitat Connectivity: White River Watershed Upper and Lower Eaton Dams, First Branch White River, Windsor County, Royalton, VT Longitude: -72.514982 Latitude: 43.832124 Left: Upper Eaton Dam before removal (WRP). Right: Lower Eaton Dam before removal looking upsteam (WRP). Left: Upper Eaton Dam after removal (USFWS). Right: Lower Eaton Dam, looking downstream, during removal (USFWS). Site description: Located in Royalton, Vermont the Upper & Lower Eaton Dams are the first two dams on the First Branch of the White River; both dams were inactive and are barriers to aquatic organism passage and sediment continuity; and the landowners support a dam removal project. Problems / history: The dams block natural stream function and aquatic organism passage to 15 miles of upstream habitat. The section of the First Branch was listed as "impaired" for bacteria in 2016 and water quality monitoring indicated that fine sediments deposits behind the dams may be harboring bacteria populations. Removing the dam will restore the natural sediment regime, and will remove the conditions for bacteria to thrive. Objective and Method: The removal of the dams will address an upstream water quality issue, improve flood resiliency, restore sediment transport and restore fish passage to 15 miles of habitat for brook trout, dwarf wedgemussel, sea lamprey, and American eel. Partners and Funding: Funding and support for this project came from the Upper Connecticut River Mitigation and Enhancement Fund (funding), Greater Upper Valley Trout Unlimited (funding), Vermont DEC (funding), White River Partnership (project management), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (technical assistance, funding-NFPP). Budget: UCRMEF GUVTU VDEC WRP USFWS TOTAL $107,640 $2,920 $61,500 $8,848 $50,000 $230,908 . -
Evaluation of Wild Brook Trout Populations in Vermont Streams
Evaluation of Wild Brook Trout Populations in Vermont Streams Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department Annual Report State: Vermont Project No.: F-36-R-19 Grant Title: Inland Waters Fisheries and Habitat Management Study No. I Study Title: Salmonid Inventory and Management Period Covered: July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 SUMMARY Wild brook trout populations in Vermont streams appeared to be relatively stable over a period of five decades as evidenced in this evaluation of 150 sites. Present-day brook trout populations sampled in 138 streams within 17 watersheds were characterized by abundant natural reproduction and multiple age-classes, including the contribution of older, larger fish. While most population measures were consistent between the two time periods, significantly higher densities of young-of-year brook trout were observed in current populations which may reflect improved environmental protections initiated since the 1950s. A decline in sympatric brown trout and rainbow trout sites also suggest that non-native trout populations have not appreciably expanded over the past 50 years. INTRODUCTION Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis are native to Vermont and are widely distributed throughout the state (VDFW 1993, EBTJV). It is the fish species most likely to be encountered in small upland streams, particularly at higher elevations where it is often the only fish species inhabiting these waters. In addition to being an indicator of high quality aquatic habitat, brook trout are also a favorite of Vermont anglers. Statewide angler surveys conducted in 1991, 2000 and 2010, revealed it was the fish species most preferred by Vermont resident anglers (Claussen et al. 1992, Kuentzel 2001, Connelly and Knuth 2010). -
Town of Hartford Draft Town Plan
TOWN OF HARTFORD DRAFT TOWN PLAN March 11, 2019* Prepared by the Hartford Planning Commission with the assistance from the Hartford Department of Planning and Development Services and the Town Plan Steering Committee * This Plan has been updated since the 2/22/19 Draft. The additions are highlighted in red and underlined, and deletions are highlighted in red with the slash-out feature. In some instances, these reflect relocation and not substantial changes. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION TO TOWN PLANNING According to the book, “Essentials of Land Use Planning and Regulation” by the Vermont Land Use Education and Training Collaborative, “the municipal plan is the visionary document that assesses the current status of a community and lays out a vision for the future.” Used interchangeably with the term “Town Plan”, it is an in-depth, comprehensive, long range study that provides the framework for future decisions regarding land use, transportation, community facilities and services, utilities, natural resources, historic resources, and housing. It is a guide that establishes a strategy on how to grow while managing the community’s resources and maintaining a high quality of life. The Town Plan provides the basis for public and private investment. It also establishes an implementation program that provides a means of achieving the community vision. HARTFORD’S GEOGRAPHY Hartford, Vermont is located at the confluence of the White and Connecticut Rivers and includes a third river, the Ottauquechee. It is also at the junction of Interstate Highways 89 and 91 and the junction of U.S. Highways 4 and 5 on the eastern side of Vermont about halfway up the state. -
Response Summary for Comments Received on the Vermont 2010 Draft Versions of The
Response summary for comments received on the Vermont 2010 Draft versions of the: 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (Part A) List of Priority Waters (Parts B-G) Attachment A: Part B justification for Big Spruce Brook Attachment B: 1272 Order issued to Stowe Mountain Resort Draft Lists Comment Period A public comment period was established upon the release of the draft 2010 303(d) List of Impaired Waters and the 2010 List of Priority Waters (the Lists) from March 11, 2010 through April 9, 2010. In conjunction with the release of the draft Lists, an informational public meeting was conducted in Waterbury on March 24, 2010 to present the Lists and to answer any questions. At the close of the public comment period, VTDEC had received comments from the following seven parties: Commenter: Submitted by: Identification: City of Rutland Same Rutland Stowe Mountain Resort VHB/Pioneer Stowe Windham Regional Commission, Natural Same WRC Resources Committee Stratton Area Citizen’s Committee Same SACC USEPA Region 1 Same USEPA1 Bromley Mountain Ski Resort VHB/Pioneer Bromley Summit Ventures NE, LLC (Sugarbush Resort) VHB/Pioneer Sugarbush Some comments have been edited or paraphrased for greater clarity and brevity, but every effort was made to preserve the original meaning and context. Comments are grouped according to pertinent sections of the lists. Part A and Interim List Comments 1. Comment: We are concerned that sediment has been removed as a pollutant from the West River below Ball Mt Dam to Townshend Dam -10miles (VT11-10). It appears that the sediment that was released from Ball Mt Lake into the West River below the Ball Mt Dam over 10 years ago has been washed away enough to create an equilibrium in the flow of sediment. -
Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered Usace Sites
HYDROPOWER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AT NON-POWERED USACE SITES Prepared by the Hydropower Analysis Center for USACE Headquarters July 2013 Final Report Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered USACE Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the largest owner-operator of hydropower plants in the United States, with 75 plants and an installed capability of 21,000 megawatts (MW), or about 24% of the total hydroelectric capacity. This report describes a national hydropower resource assessment study that assessed the potential and economic feasibility of adding hydroelectric power to these non- powered USACE projects over a 50-year period of analysis. Site Selection In selecting non-powered USACE projects with hydropower potential, the study employed a 2012 report by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) that identified the hydropower potential of 54,000 non- powered dams in the United States. Among these dams, 419 were USACE non-powered dams. This number was reduced to 223 sites using the following screening, as shown on the table below. • Generate 1 MW or more of potential hydropower. • No current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license. • No obvious hindrances in developing hydropower. Distribution of USACE Sites with Potential Hydropower Capability FERC Preliminary or No FERC Permits Total Projects Pending Preliminary Permit Division Identified Total Percentage Total Percent Number of Total Number of Total Great Lakes & Ohio River (LRD) 71 40 56% 31 44% Mississippi Valley (MVD) 50 28 56% 22 44% Southwestern (SWD) 39 7 18% 32 82% North Atlantic (NAD) 21 2 10% 19 90% South Atlantic (SAD) 19 8 42% 11 58% Northwestern (NWD) 12 5 42% 7 58% South Pacific (SPD) 11 2 18% 9 82% USACE Total 223 92 41% 131 59% Data Collection To improve the study data, the daily hydraulic head and flow values for all 223 sites were obtained. -
The Shopper 05-02-18
56 FREE Years We’ve Acquired the Message Treat your ECRWSS PRSRT STD US Postage Mom for PAID Permit #2 North Haverhill, NH See Page 3B POSTAL CUSTOMER Our Contact Information is on Page 6A Independently Owned & Locally Operated MAY 02, 2018 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM VOLUME 56, ISSUE 49 Apple Blossom Cotillion See Pages 8A - 10A KMA Publications Inc. Construction on Woolson acquires The Message of the Block building expected to Week start in the fall REGION – Robert Miller of 1970s. “I feel like The Message BY PATRICK ADRIAN include the Springfield Housing Au- “This is a complicated project,” KMA Publications Inc., owner and is home again, back to where it The Shopper thority, Springfield Regional Devel- Morelock told the Select Board. publisher of The Vermont Journal VermontTHE started,” he said. Miller recalled opment Corporation, Springfield on “We’ve been lucky to get partners and The Shopper, announced Fri- feeling the same way when he SPRINGFIELD, Vt. – The Wool- the Move, and several social services in this particular project. If it wasn’t day, April 27, 2018 that he has pur- purchased The Shopper back in son Block building renovation organizations. for [them] we wouldn’t be doing this chased The Message of the Week. 2009, acquiring another paper has come with hurdles, including The amendment, which the Se- project. Nobody would be doing this The sale will merge the newspa- Journal his parents had started years al- revenue shortfalls and added con- lect Board unanimously approved, project.” pers but continue to be published most 57 years ago. “I grew up in struction costs, but despite chal- changes the original loan terms from Needed architectural revisions only under The Vermont Journal & the newspaper business work- lenges developers say they expect repayment over 20 years with a one have resulted in $200,000 additional and The Shopper banners. -
List of Vermont Water Bodies Known with an Aquatic Invasive Species
Key: List of Vermont water bodies known AL - alewife SS - starry stonewort BN - brittle naiad SWF - spiny water flea with an aquatic invasive species CLP - curly-leaf pondweed VLM - variable-leaved watermilfoil EF - European frogbit WC - water chestnut Updated Apr. 2016 EWM - Eurasian watermilfoil ZM - zebra mussel These species are considered the most problematic in Vermont Water body Town AL BN CLP EF EWM SWF SS VLM WC ZM Arrowhead Mountain Lake Milton X Austin Pond Hubbardton X Beaver Wetland Mendon X Beaver Pond Proctor X Beebe Pond Hubbardton X X Berlin Pond Berlin X Big Marsh Slough Highgate X X X X Black Pond Hubbardton X X Black River Springfield X Blissville Wetland Pond Blissville X Broad Brook Vernon X Brookside Pond Orwell X X Brownington Pond Brownington X Bullis Pond Franklin X X Burr Pond Sudbury X X Cabot Clark Marsh Highgate X Castleton River Castleton X Cedar Lake Monkton X Chipman Pond Tinmouth X Clay Brook Warren X Clyde Pond Derby X Coggman Creek X Coggman Pond West Haven X X X Connecticut River, Herricks Cove Rockingham X Connecticut River, Hoyts Landing Springfield X X Connecticut River, TransCanada launch Concord X Connecticut River, Wilder Dam Hartford X Cranberry Pool Highgate X X X Crystal Lake Barton X Daniels Pond Glover X Dead Creek Ferrisburgh X Dead Creek Highgate X X Deweys Mill Pond Hartford X Echo Lake Hubbardton X Fairfield Pond Fairfield X X Fairfield Swamp Pond Swanton X Fern Lake Leicester X X Forest Lake Calais X Frog Pond Orwell X Gale Meadows Pond Londonderry X Glen Lake Castleton X X 1 Water -
Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment
VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment Prepared for The Vermont River Conservancy. 29 Main St. Suite 11 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Prepared by Noah Pollock 55 Harrison Ave Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 540-0319 • [email protected] Updated May 12th, 2009 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATER TRAIL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................2 Results of the Stakeholder Review and Analysis .............................................................................5 Summary of Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Planning Documents .........................................9 Campsite and Access Point Inventory and Gap Analysis .............................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................29 Appendix A: Connecticut River Primitive Campsites and Access Meeting Notes ...................32 Appendix B: Upper Valley Land Trust Campsite Monitoring Checklist ....................................35 Appendix C: Comprehensive List of Campsites and Access Points .........................................36 Appendix D: Example Stewardship Signage .................................................................................39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Northern Forest Canoe Trail Railroad Trestle ................................................................2 -
Spotted Trout Or Landlocked Salmon INFORMATION FREE
VOL. XXVII. NO. 52. PHILLIPS, MAINE, FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 1905. PRICE 3 CENTS. JSPORTSMBN^S—SUPPLIES | SPORTSMEN’S SUPPLIES Fish and Game Oddities. SPORTSMEN'S S UPPLIE S SPORTSMEN’S SUPPLIES One of the mail carriers report seeing near the “ county bridge” in Madrid, a fox carrying a cat in it’s mouth. The fox seemed surprised at the meeting, stood still for an instant then clashed RIFLE AND PISTOL CARTF. DGES into the woods, still holding the cat. j Winchester Rifle and Pistol Cartridges of Several years ago the writer saw a fox catch a young crow. To escape the all calibers are loaded by machinery which pursuing crows ihe fox stampeded some sizes the shells, supplies the exact quantity METALLIC CARTRIDGES colts in the pasture and kept with them of powder, and seats the bullets properly. until near a thicket of small trees, then By using first-class materials and this Old and enthusiastic hunters who have “ tried them ail,” use U. M. C, Cart disappeared leaving the crows to talk ridges and recommend them to their friends. up-to-date system of loading, the reputation Ko matter what make or model of rifle you use, —U. M. C. Cartridges will give the matter over by themselves. jperior results. Buy just the right Cartridges for your gun—U. M. C. Cart of Winchester Cartridges for accuracy, Iges. Every dealer—City or country—sells U. M. C. Fish Don’t A l l Suit Them. ’"eliability and excellence is maintained. Use Cartridges made hy Cartridge specialists, 17, M . C. -
Surface Water Location of Use Watershe D Town Documentation of Existing
Table A.3. Existing uses of waters for fishing in Basin 14 (RM is river mileage measured from the river terminus) Surface Location of Use Watershe Town Documentation of Existing Use Water d Stevens From Patneaude Lane to Stevens Barnet DFW identifies fishing as an existing River Connecticut River excluding River use based on fishing stocking criteria Barnet Falls, RM 0-2.2 Stevens From Peacham Hollow Brook Stevens Barnet DFW identifies fishing as an existing River to Barnet Center Road RM River use based on fishing stocking criteria 3.8-4.8 Jewett Within Roy Mountain WMA. Stevens Barnet DFW identifies fishing as an existing Brook RM 0.1-1.7 River use based on public access Wells River From Ricker Pond to Wells River Groton, DFW identifies fishing as an existing Newbury/ Ryegate town Ryegate use based on fish stocking criteria line. RM 6.4-16.2 Wells River From below the Boltonville Wells River Newbury DFW identifies fishing as an existing Falls for 0.5 miles. RM 4.6 – use based on fish stocking criteria 5.1 Wells River From .2 miles above the Wells River Newbury DFW identifies fishing as an existing Tenney Pond tributary to use based on fish stocking criteria above Adams Paper and public lands Company Dam. RM 1.7-2.6 East Brook Within Pine Mountain WMA. Wells River Topsham/G DFW identifies fishing as an existing RM 0.9-1.8 roton use based on public access Keenan Within Pine Mountain WMA Wells River Topsham/G DFW identifies fishing as an existing Brook RM. -
Woodsville, New Hampshire and Wells River, Vermont
Woodsville, New Hampshire and Wells River, Vermont 1 2021 Woodsville/Wells River 4th of July Celebration Schedule of Events 9:00 AM Flea Market Opens 11:00 AM Gigantic Parade Until 1:00 PM Barry Hayes 12:30 PM Midway Opens -Vertical Entertainment NH 2:00-8:00 Dunk Tank 1:00-3:00 DJ Mike 2:00-9:00 BINGO Under the Tent 3:00-5:00 Back Shed String Band 5:00-8:00 DJ Mike 8:00-10:00 The Sled Wrenches—opener Bim Tyler 9:00 Parade Winners Announced 9:00 Raffle Drawing - Winners Announced 10:00 PM Immense Fireworks Display! ABSOLUTELY NO PETS ALLOWED ON THE COMMUNITY FIELD 2 Paul “The Barber” Tetreault Paul was known as “The Barber” in Woodsville for well over 60 years. His first shop was located in the Wentworth Hotel Building until a fire destroyed the building and he was forced to re-locate next door in the Mt. Gardner View Apartment Building. After many years at that location, a broken waterpipe and ensuing water damage caused him to re- locate once again to 83 Central Street. He loved his loyal customers who fol- lowed him from shop to shop where they found Paul ready to cut hair and always up-to-date and ready to discuss all the local happenings. Paul and his wife, Lorayne, raised 4 children in North Haverhill. Over the years, the family grew to include 13 grandchildren, 17 great grandchildren and 1 great-great grandchild. Paul served in the NH Army National Guard and was honorably discharged in September 1960. -
The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences
The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences Eve Vogel1 Department of Geosciences, UMass Amherst With assistance from Alexandra Lacy 2011 alumna (BS, Environmental Sciences), UMass Amherst Adapted from: Vogel, Eve and Alexandra Lacy. Forthcoming. The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences. The Northeastern Geographer 4 (2) Introduction For a person familiar with federal dams on major rivers in the American West or South, a visit to an Army Corps of Engineers dam in New England’s largest river basin, the Connecticut, can be a startling experience. Instead of an extended reservoir, one looks down from the empty heights and on both sides sees only a small river far below. Nor is there the fanfare – the visitors center, the historical information, the celebratory propaganda. Simply finding one of the Connecticut River’s federal dams can take some effort. None are on the mainstem. One must drive through the bucolic New England byways and forested hills to find a dam on a tributary (See Figure 1). For New Englanders, the near-invisibility of federal dams may not seem surprising. New England’s history and identity, including the Connecticut Valley’s, seem to rest with the small- to medium-scale development of rivers with mill dams during the 17th thru 19th centuries (e.g. Delaney 1983; Steinberg 1991). It might be more startling for many to learn that during the mid- twentieth century, the federal government did build a series of very large dams in the Connecticut Basin, which have had profound effect on the river.