Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law Human Rights Brief Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 8 2008 Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts Shaleen Brunsdale American University Washington College of Law Rita Espinoza American University Washington College of Law Sarah Venti American University Washington College of Law Katherine Anne Cleary American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Brunsdale, Shaleen, Rita Espinoza, Sarah Venti, and Katherine Anne Cleary. "Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Courts." Human Rights Brief 16, no.1 (2008): 44-49. This Column is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brunsdale et al.: Updates from the International and Internationalized Criminal Cou UPDATES FROM INTERNATIONAL AND INTERNATIONALIZED CRIMINAL COURTS & TRIBUNALS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL The proposed amended indictment con- Sentencing of Rasim Deli ´c TRI B UNAL F OR THE FORMER tains several counts of genocide, perse- YU G O S LA V IA AND THE BO S NIAN cution, murder, deportation, terror, and On September 15, 2008, Rasim Deli ´c, WAR CRIME S CHAM B ER S taking of hostages. Karadži ´c waived his the Commander of the Main Staff of the right to duty counsel and decided to rep- Army of Bosnia-Herzegovina (ABiH), was The Arrest of Radovan Karadži ´c resent himself, stating that the Tribunal is sentenced to three years imprisonment. Deli ´c is one of the most senior military Former Bosnian Serb leader, Radovan not a legitimate court, but rather represents commanders — as well as one of only a Karadži ´c, was arrested on July 21, 2008 by a “bastardized judicial system” which was few Bosnian Muslims — to be tried before Serbian officials. Karadži ´c was indicted for “created to blame the Serbs.” the Tribunal on charges of superior crimi- a host of human rights violations including Meanwhile, Karadži ´c’s military com- nal responsibility for the crimes of murder genocide, extermination, and inhumane mander, Ratko Mladi ´c, is still on the run. and cruel treatment. acts. He is charged with the killing of thou- Mladi ´c was also jointly indicted more than sands of Bosnian Muslims and Croats dur- a decade ago for genocide, complicity in Deli ´c was indicted in March 2005, and ing the Bosnian war and for the Srebrenica genocide, crimes against humanity, and his indictment was amended in June 2006. massacre, in which approximately 8,000 violations of the laws or customs of war. His alleged crimes included failing to take Muslim men and boys were killed. The arrest of Karadži ´c led to renewed reasonable measures to punish the perpe- trators of executions of captured Bosnian Karadži ´c was on the run for nearly thir- speculation that Mladi ´c, the commander Croats and surrendered HVO soldiers in teen years, eluding UN and NATO efforts of the Bosnian Serb Forces, was also the Travnik municipality in central Bosnia to capture him. His arrest by Serbian within reach. The tribunal’s prosecutors and Herzegovina; failing to take necessary security officials brought a sense of relief have been convinced for years that Mladi ´c steps to prevent torture, beating, murder, to victims and their families as well as to was in hiding in Serbia, although there is and decapitation committed by his subor- Serbian officials who were under increas- currently no confirmation of this belief. dinates in a detention facility for captured ing pressure to arrest Karadži ´c. But, there Serbia’s current request to join the Euro- Bosnian Serb Army soldiers; and failing still remain many Serbian nationalists who pean Union hinges on Mladi´c’s arrest. to prevent the rape of three women by his are strong supporters of Karadži ´c and who Arresting Mladi ´c may prove more difficult subordinates in the Kamenica Camp in held demonstrations to protest his arrest. than capturing Karadži ´c as Mladi ´c is more secretive and reclusive, and is reportedly central Bosnia and Herzegovina. Karadži´c was admitted to the UN guarded by a host of loyal, and possibly Deli ´c pled not guilty to all charges. detention unit in The Hague on July 30, well-armed, soldiers. The trial, which commenced in July 2007, 2008, and his initial appearance before lasted for 114 days. Deli´c was found the court on July 31 was no doubt the Karadži ´c’s trial may be a great mile- guilty, by majority, of failing to take start of what will be a long legal battle. stone for justice, but it will not be enough the necessary and reasonable measures Karadži ´c declined to enter a plea and in to solve Bosnia’s complex human rights to prevent and punish the crimes of cruel accordance with the rules, after 30 days problems. The bloody war directed by treatment committed by the El Mujahed the court entered a plea of not guilty on Karadži ´c and General Mladi ´c left many Detachment (EMD) of ABiH. The EMD his behalf. On September 22, a motion victims in its wake. Over a decade later, came into existence as a unit of the Army to amend the first amended indictment there are still more than 130,000 displaced of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina was entered by the office of the prosecu- Bosnians who are unable to return home. by virtue of an order signed by Deli ´c. tor (the initial indictments were issued in There is still a great need for housing, 1995 and amended in 2000). This motion social services and economic opportuni- ties, and the fear of violence and Islamic Deli´c was acquitted of three other restructured the charges, and prosecutors counts of murder and cruel treatment. In hoped the streamlined indictment would terrorism is still prevalent. Despite the obstacles that remain, Karadži ´c’s trial in those cases the Trial Chamber found that help speed up the trial by contributing to no superior-subordinate relationship had an efficient and expeditious presentation The Hague is a chance for Bosnia to come to terms with its past. Since its concep- existed between Deli ´c and the perpetrators of the prosecution’s case. Experts and at that time, and the Chamber could not those working in the field criticized the tion in 1993 the Tribunal has indicted 161 people and convicted 56 people in connec- conclude beyond reasonable doubt that tribunal as ineffective and inefficient after Deli ´c had reason to know these crimes the trial of the former Yugoslav presi- tion with the Balkan wars, and has made considerable progress toward justice for a were about to be or were committed. These dent Miloševi ´c was drawn out for four alternate rulings point to the nuanced years. Miloševi ´c eventually died in his cell region plagued by some of the worst vio- lence in Europe since World War II. understanding of human rights violations, before a verdict was reached. Karadži ´c’s since Deli ´c neither witnessed the afore- indictment was amended to be leaner in mentioned crimes nor did he order his hopes of avoiding the strategic mistakes of soldiers to commit them. Rather, he failed the Miloševi ´c trial. 44 Published by Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law, 2008 1 Human Rights Brief, Vol. 16, Iss. 1 [2008], Art. 8 to control, monitor, and discipline his sub- In August 2008, the Trial Chamber commit genocide, and the crime against ordinates who committed the crimes. issued an indictment against Florence humanity of persecution and extermination. Hartmann, a former spokeswoman for the Nahimana and Barayagwiza were found Bosnian Serb and Bosnian Croat offi- Tribunal’s Chief Prosecutor, on two counts guilty based on their roles as members cials and war victims groups felt the sen- of contempt of the Tribunal. Hartmann of the “Comité d’Initiative” that founded tence might have been too lenient. Bosnian is alleged to have authored a book called Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines Serb Prime Minister, Milorad Dodik, said “Paix and Chatiment” (Peace and Punish- (“RTLM”), a radio station that broadcast the sentence showed that “justice for the ment), published in 2007, and an article virulent messages directed at Tutsis and Serb victims of the war is really unreach- published on the website of the Bosnian moderate Hutus between July 1993 and able.” These trials are politically charged, Institute in 2008, both of which disclosed July 1994. Ngeze, on the other hand, was largely because the few Bosnian Mus- information related to confidential deci- convicted based on acts committed as the lims tried by the ICTY have so far been sions of the Tribunal’s Appeals Chamber founder, owner, and editor of Kangura, a acquitted or received relatively lenient in the case of Slobodan Miloševi ´c. The newspaper published from 1990 to 1995 sentences. Order states, “Florence Hartmann knew that carried hate-filled messages similar to that the information was confidential at those broadcast on RTLM. Sentence Enforcements the time disclosure was made, that the decisions from which the information was Each of the defendants appealed to the On September 15, 2008, Albania drawn were ordered to be filed confiden- Appeals Chamber, raising a number of became the seventeenth state to sign the tially, and that by her disclosure she was issues. One of the more interesting argu- agreement on enforcement of sentences revealing confidential information to the ments against the Trial Chamber judg- with the ICTY, allowing persons convicted public.” Hartmann has rejected the charges ment relied on the fact that, although before the Tribunal to serve their sentences and maintained that she was acting in the the juris diction of the ICTR is limited to in its prisons.
Recommended publications
  • Darfur Genocide
    Darfur genocide Berkeley Model United Nations Welcome Letter Hi everyone! Welcome to the Darfur Historical Crisis committee. My name is Laura Nguyen and I will be your head chair for BMUN 69. This committee will take place from roughly 2006 to 2010. Although we will all be in the same physical chamber, you can imagine that committee is an amalgamation of peace conferences, UN meetings, private Janjaweed or SLM meetings, etc. with the goal of preventing the Darfur Genocide and ending the War in Darfur. To be honest, I was initially wary of choosing the genocide in Darfur as this committee’s topic; people in Darfur. I also understood that in order for this to be educationally stimulating for you all, some characters who committed atrocious war crimes had to be included in debate. That being said, I chose to move on with this topic because I trust you are all responsible and intelligent, and that you will treat Darfur with respect. The War in Darfur and the ensuing genocide are grim reminders of the violence that is easily born from intolerance. Equally regrettable are the in Africa and the Middle East are woefully inadequate for what Darfur truly needs. I hope that understanding those failures and engaging with the ways we could’ve avoided them helps you all grow and become better leaders and thinkers. My best advice for you is to get familiar with the historical processes by which ethnic brave, be creative, and have fun! A little bit about me (she/her) — I’m currently a third-year at Cal majoring in Sociology and minoring in Data Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Report January 2014
    منظمة حقوق اﻻنسان والتنمية Human Rights and Development Organization (HUDO) South Kordufan / Nuba Mountains Monthly Report (January 2014) Introduction: In this month Sudan government become very much repressive by reinforcing all rejected Laws, for the first time it has reinforced the Armed Forces Law amended in June last year, this laws allows prosecution of civilians before military courts. It has also activated other laws of the Voluntary Work Act for the year 2006 which gives the Minister the right to do whatever suits him. Under these laws the minister suspended the activities of the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC), this move band more than 1.5 million people from the service of ICRC mostly in Darfur. Despite the crimes they committed in Darfur and their participation in the fighting in Southern Kordofan recently, the Janjaweed militias are now terrorizing civilians in Al Obeid before those who created them in Darfur and brought them to Kordofan. Security Situation: Sudanese authority continues air bombardment in the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile, Kauda area (SPLA control) has been aggressively bombarded during January this year. The security situation is worsening in Kordofan Al Obeid due to the presence of the Janjaweed after being chased from battle field in Southern Kordofan. Currently they are rapping women, looting civilians’ properties and attacking people on daily bases in Al Obeid. Political Development: The President’s recent statement which people had been optimistically awaiting for was very disappointing; it was expected to bring new changes in Sudanese politics but was sarcasm instead. Peace talks between Sudan Government and SPLM- N is due to resume in February with a hope of pushing the implementation of the previous agreements and opening the paths for relief to reach the war affected people in Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile pending for the final and comprehensive settlement of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Report 2010 Public Information and Documentation Section | Outreach Unit Foreword
    Outreach Report 2010 Public Information and Documentation Section | Outreach Unit Foreword This is the fourth Outreach Report published by my office since the Outreach Unit of the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in 2007. It presents the work carried out from 1 October 2009 to 1 October 2010 by ICC Outreach Unit staff members at the seat of the Court in The Hague, and in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the Central African Republic (CAR), and Kenya. It also includes the work of the Outreach Unit in Chad and other countries where large groups of Sudanese populations are currently residing. The report outlines many of the activities conducted during this period and the results achieved, as well as the contextual judicial and other factors influencing our work, challenges faced along the way, and the plans for going forward. The report is also a demonstration of the hard work and dedication of my staff, both at headquarters and in the field. They have contributed to further advance our plans ICC Registrar Silvana Arbia ©ICC-CPI/Max Koot to make justice meaningful among communities affected by the crimes in situations and cases brought before the Court. Over the past reporting period, the Registry has responded to a series of emerging challenges while maintaining its efforts to counter misconceptions, make proceedings accessible, and create realistic expectations of the Court’s work among affected communities. Our rapid response capacity was once again tested this year in explaining and clarifying certain judicial decisions. My office was able to deploy an interdisciplinary team in Kenya before Pre-Trial Chamber I decided to grant the Prosecutor approval to investigate alleged crimes committed in the territory of that country in relation with the post-election violence of 2007 and 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Puun 1 9 8 0 0
    GENERAL ASSEMBLY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: THIRTY-FIFTH SESSION SUPPLEMENT No. 23 (A/35/23/Rev.1) UNITED NATIONS New York, 1981 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON THE SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The present version of the report of the Special Committee is a consolidation of the following documents as they appeared in provisional form: A/35/23 (Part I) of 26 November 1980, A/35/23 (Part II) of 24 September 1980, A/35/23 (Part III) of 15 September 1980, A/35/23 (Part IV) of 15 September 1930, A/35/23 (Part V) of 26 September 1980 and A/35/23 (Part VI) of 24 October 1980. /Original: Engrlish! CONTENiTS Parar-ranhs Fage LLTTER OF 'RA;ITTAL . Chapter I. ESTADLISIL'i;T, ORGAIdZATICii AND ACTIVITIIIES OF THE SP2CIAL COO1iiITTLE (A/35/23 (Part I)) ...... ................ Establishment of the Special Committee ........... i3. Opening of the Special Committee's meetings in 1980. C. Organization of work.. ....... .................. 0. ifeetings of the Special Committee and its subsidiary bodies ............ ....................... Consideration of Territories ..... .............. F. Question of the list of Territories to which the Declaration is applicable ...... ................ G. Participation of national liberation movements in the work of the United iFations ................. H. Hatters relating to the small Territories .......... I. Week of Solidarity writh the Colonial Peoples of Southern Africa Fighting for Freedom, Independence and Equal Rights .......
    [Show full text]
  • FROM the TAYLOR TRIAL to a LASTING LEGACY: PUTTING the SPECIAL COURT ©2009 International Center MODEL to the TEST for Transitional Justice and Thierry Cruvellier
    PROSECUTIONS CASE STUDIES SER I E S Sierra Leone Court Monitoring Programme FROM THE TAYLOR TRIAL TO A LASTING LEGACY: PUTTING THE SPECIAL COURT ©2009 International Center MODEL TO THE TEST for Transitional Justice and Thierry Cruvellier FROM THE TAYLOR TRIAL TO A LASTING LEGACY: PUTTING THE SP E C I A L COURT MODEL TO THE TEST ©2009 International Center for Transitional Justice, The Sierra Leone Court Monitoring Programme and Thierry Cruvellier This document may be cited as Thierry Cruvellier, From the Taylor Trial to a Lasting Legacy : Putting the Special Court Model to the Test (2009), International Center for Transitional Justice and Sierra Leone Court Monitoring Programme ISBN 978-1-936064-01-4 Sierra Leone Court Monitoring Programme i ABOUT THE ICTJ The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) assists countries pursuing accountability for past mass atrocity or human rights abuse. It works in societies emerging from repressive rule or armed conflict, as well as in established democracies where historical injustices or systemic abuse remain unresolved. In order to promote justice, peace, and reconciliation, government officials and nongovernmental advocates are likely to consider a variety of transitional justice approaches including both judicial and nonjudicial responses to human rights crimes. ICTJ assists in the development of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to transitional justice comprising five key elements: prosecuting perpetrators; documenting and acknowledging violations through nonjudicial means such as truth commissions; reforming abusive institutions; providing reparations to victims; and facilitating reconciliation processes. The center is committed to building local capacity and generally strengthening the emerging field of transitional justice, and it works closely with organizations and experts around the world to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Practice of the UN Security
    SELECTED PRACTISE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL IN RELATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND THE ROME STATUTE SYSTEM (1998-2012) 3nd Update: 10 October 2012 Contents: 1. Highlights on the fight against impunity through referrals by the Security Council under Article 13 of the Rome Statute ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Côte d’Ivoire .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Darfur, Sudan ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Democratic Republic of the Congo .................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Gaza ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Kenya ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Libya ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Mali .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.8 Myanmar/Burma .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SCSL Press Clippings
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE PRESS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Press and Public Affairs Office as at: Thursday, 3 May 2007 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News Issa Sesay Commences His Defence Today / Awoko Page 3 AI Blasts Judiciary / For di People Page 4 International News Date of Taylor trial announced / Legalbrief Today Page 5 UNMIL Public Information Office Media Summary / UNMIL Pages 6-8 ICC issues Darfur arrest warrants / BBC Pages 9-10 Warrants of Arrest for the Minister of State for Humanitarian Affairs of Sudan…/ ICC Pages 11-12 3 Awoko Thursday, 3 May 2007 4 For di People Thursday, 3 May 2007 5 Legalbrief Today Thursday, 3 May 2007 http://www.legalbrief.co.za/article.php?story=20070503082412777 Date of Taylor trial announced Published in: Legalbrief Today Date: Thu 03 May 2007 Category: Criminal Issue No: 1816 Acting Registrar Herman von Hebel, of the UN backed Special Court for Sierra Leone, says former President Charles Taylor's war crimes trial is expected to start on June 4 at The Hague at the premises of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Although the ICC is to be used, he says in a report in the Concord Times, Taylor will remain within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and the proceedings will conform with its own. ‘ Full Concord Times report 6 United Nations Nations Unies United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) UNMIL Public Information Office Media Summary 02 May 2007 [The media summaries and press clips do not necessarily represent the views of UNMIL.] International Clips on Liberia Mano River Union Leaders End Meeting Monrovia, May 02, 2007 (Liberia Government/All Africa Global Media via COMTEX) --The Heads of the State of the Mano River Union Monday concluded their summit in Conakry, Guinea geared towards fostering peace and cooperation within the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan: Justice, Peace and the Icc
    SUDAN: JUSTICE, PEACE AND THE ICC Africa Report N°152 – 17 July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. DARFUR AND THE ICC................................................................................................. 2 A. THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN DARFUR ..........................................................................................3 B. INTERNATIONAL REACTION .........................................................................................................5 III. REACTIONS TO THE APPLICATION FOR BASHIR’S ARREST ......................... 7 A. DIVISIONS WITHIN THE NCP AND THE ISLAMIC MOVEMENT .......................................................8 B. THE NCP ARGUMENT AGAINST ICC JURISDICTION ...................................................................10 C. A FAILED POLITICAL RESPONSE ................................................................................................12 D. THE NCP AND ARTICLE 16........................................................................................................15 1. Mobilisation of regional support................................................................................................15 2. Negotiations with the P5............................................................................................................16 IV. AFTER BASHIR’S INDICTMENT .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone
    Seventh Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone June 2009 to May 2010 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/266656/ PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/266656/ Seventh Annual Report of the President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone June 2009 to May 2010 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/266656/ contents Foreword 5 Fundraising and Diplomatic Relations 39 Europe 39 Introduction 9 North America 40 Summary of Activities 9 United nations 40 New York sub-office 40 Judicial Proceedings 13 Trial chamber II 13 outreach and Public Affairs 43 The Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor 13 Video screening of trial summaries 43 Appeals chamber 15 Public Lectures 44 Interlocutory Appeals in Prosecutor v. Taylor 15 Legacy specific Activities: seminars and Appellate Proceedings in Prosecutor v. sesay, Accountability now clubs (ANCs) in tertiary Kallon and Gbao: (June 2009-october 2009) 17 Institutions 44 the RUF Appeal Judgment 19 special events and court tours 44 Publication of Informational and Human Rights other chamber’s Activities 23 Materials 45 14th Plenary Meeting of Judges 23 civil society Visits to the Hague 45 Meeting with DoMAc Project 23 school Visits and other Programmes 45 Visit from War crimes Division of Ugandan Judiciary 23 Legacy 47 Meeting with ICTR Prosecutor 24 Principle Legacy Initiatives of the Registry Launching of Report on Work of the SCSL by sections 47 the ICTJ 24 site Project 48 expert Group Meeting on Residual Issues 24 Prosecution Legacy Activities 48 Meetings with United nations Assistant secretary- chambers Legacy Activities 49 General for Legal Affairs and U.s.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur in February 2008
    Sudan HUMAN “They Shot at Us as We Fled” RIGHTS Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur WATCH “They Shot at Us as We Fled” Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-320-X Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org May 2008 1-56432-320-X “They Shot at Us as We Fled” Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur in February 2008 Map of Northern West Darfur.................................................................................... 1 I. Summary...............................................................................................................2 II. Recommendations .............................................................................................. 6 To the Sudanese government............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 28 Sep 2021 at 17:55:18, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/EFEDBED0B84359DFA281A9079047846F Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 28 Sep 2021 at 17:55:18, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/EFEDBED0B84359DFA281A9079047846F A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW International criminal law has witnessed a rapid rise since the end of the Cold War. The United Nations refers to the birth of a new ‘age of accountability’, but certain historical objections, such as selectivity or victor’s justice, have never fully gone away, and many of the justice dimensions of international criminal law remain unexplored. Various critiques have emerged in sociolegal scholarship or globalization discourse, revealing that there is a stark discrepancy between reality and expectation. Linking discussion of legal theories, case law and practice to scholarship and opinion, A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law explores these critiques through five main themes at the heart of contemporary dilemmas: • The shifting contours of criminality and international crimes • The tension between individual and collective responsibility • The challenges of domestic, international, hybrid and regional justice institutions • The foundations of justice procedures • Approaches towards punishment and reparation. The book is suitable for students, academics and professionals from multiple fields wishing to understand contemporary theories, practices and critiques of international criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Politics of Justice at the International Criminal Court
    PRIF Report No. 127 Growing Up Rough: The Changing Politics of Justice at the International Criminal Court Caroline Fehl the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) 2014 Correspondence to: PRIF (HSFK) Baseler Straße 27-31 60329 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone: +49(0)69 95 91 04-0 Fax: +49(0)69 55 84 81 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-3-942532-76-1 Euro 10,-- Summary The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established at The Hague in 2002 with a mandate to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. The ICC operates as a court of “last resort” that becomes active only when national governments are unwilling or unable to prosecute relevant crimes. Its jurisdiction is subject to various conditions, and can be triggered by the referral of a “situation” to the Court by the UN Security Council, by a state party referral, or through a proprio motu investigation initiated by the ICC Prosecutor. Since taking up its work in 2002, the ICC has investigated nine situations, held six trials of individuals and handed down two convictions. In addition, it has conducted 12 preliminary examinations that have not resulted in the opening of official investigations. All investigations and trials to date have focused on African countries. From its inception, the ICC has been a highly contested institution-building project. Already the negotiations about its statute were marked by heated controversies among participating states. Following the statute’s entry into force, political debates have continued to surround the Court’s relationship with member and non-member states as well as its investigations, arrest warrants and trials have continued to be the subject of political debates.
    [Show full text]