General Assembly Distr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly Distr UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/7/NGO/55 25 February 2008 ENGLISH ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Seventh session Agenda item 4 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE THE COUNCIL’S ATTENTION Written statement* submitted by Society for Threatened Peoples, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [20 February 2008] • This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non-governmental organization(s). GE.08-10914 A/HRC/7/NGO/55 page 2 Sudan No end to impunity for crimes against humanity in Darfur The Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Luis Moreno-Ocampo, urged the international community on September 20, 2007 to ensure that Sudan turns over two Darfur war crimes suspects. “World leaders must understand that if the justice component process is ignored crimes will continue and affect the humanitarian and security operation in Darfur”, declared Moreno-Ocampo. On April 27, 2007 the ICC had issued arrest warrants for Ahmed Haroun, the deputy Interior Minister of Sudan in 2003 and 2004, and the Janjaweed-Commander Ali Kushayb for 51 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur. But no concrete action of the Sudanese authorities followed. In September 2007 the Government appointed the then State Minister of Humanitarian Affairs Ahmed Haroun despite the arrest warrants to co-chair a committee which should analyze the human rights situation in western Sudan. Haroun still has not been transferred to The Hague to face criminal investigation by the ICC. In his position as the government’s liaison with UNAMID he maintains a prominent position in Sudanese politics. Haroun was quoted as saying that he had been given the authority to either kill or forgive in Darfur for the sake of peace and security. According to the ICC he was responsible for organizing and funding the Janjaweed. Ali Kushayb who commanded thousands of Janjaweed allegedly stood by and promoted rape and torture as part of the war strategy. He was one of the key militia leaders responsible for attacks on villages in West Darfur in 2003 / 2004. ICC judges are convinced that he bears responsibility for rapes, destruction of property, perpetrating inhumane acts as well as attacking and killing civilians in at least four villages. He was imprisoned in Sudan from November 2006 to October 2007 on unrelated charges, but then released without being transferred to the ICC. In April 2006 the UN Security Council imposed financial sanctions and a travel ban against Janjaweed-Commander Musa Hilal for obstructing peace in Darfur. After being convicted in 1998 for armed robbery against the Central Bank of Nyala he was released from prison by the Government of Sudan in 2003 to help crush the rebellion in Darfur. In 2005 Hilal admitted in interviews that he recruited Arab tribesmen on behalf of the Government of Sudan to fight against rebels in Darfur. Numerous eyewitnesses named Hilal as responsible for brutal attacks on the civilian population, rape, destruction of villages and ethnic cleansing. Despite his prominent role in the crimes against humanity, Hilal on January 18, 2008 was appointed special advisor for the Ministry of Federal Affairs in Sudan. The three cases are clear evidence that the Government of Sudan is not committed to end impunity in Darfur. Unfortunately the UN Security Council failed to agree on a presidential statement supporting the arrest of Darfur war crime suspects and their extradition to the ICC on December 9, 2007 due to blocking votes of China and Qatar. Desperate human rights situation in Darfur In March 2007 a UN fact-finding mission led by U.S. Nobel laureate Jody Williams concluded that the Government of Sudan had orchestrated militia attacks on civilians in Darfur. The U.N. Human Rights Council rejected the recommendations of Williams’ team, voting instead to create an expert group. A week after this group of seven rights experts had A/HRC/7/NGO/55 page 3 accused Sudan of failing to protect civilians in Darfur from rape, torture and other forms of violence, the Human Rights Council dissolved this committee on December 14, 2007 due to demands from African countries to ease the political pressure on Sudan. The situation in Darfur has evolved from an armed conflict between liberation movements and the government into a violent scramble for power and resources involving government forces, Janjaweed militias, liberation movements and bandits. But this complex situation should not divert attention from Khartoum’s responsibility for crimes against humanity. Sudan’s government is responsible for indiscriminate aerial bombing, ground attacks on the civilian population, complicity in Janjaweed attacks on villages and for its failure to protect the civilian population. Monitors of the African Union, U.N. rights experts, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, U.N. agencies, Sudanese and international human rights organisations and humanitarian organizations have been documenting crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing and other gross human rights violations in Darfur in dozens of reports. Thousands of pages with testimonies from victims or their family members have been published. Recent satellite photos documented the widespread destruction of villages and the entire ethnic and social system in western Sudan. According to estimates 2.066 villages in Darfur have been destroyed in Darfur since February 2003, a further 685 villages have been partly destroyed. At least 2.4 million persons became Internal Displaced People. More than 400,000 were seeking refuge in neighbouring Chad. In February 2008 around 50,000 people in Darfur fled their villages due to a military offensive of the Sudanese army. Nearly every month tens of thousands of civilians had to flee to protect their lives from attacks by militias, rebels, bandits or the regular army. There is no efficient protection for the civilian population in western Sudan. Not even in the larger towns or in IDP camps, civilians are protected and safe. In 2007 once again hundreds of women and girls were raped, especially near IDP camps. Sometimes Sudanese officials have been pressurised IDP’s to leave refugee camps. In October 2007, U.N. officials accused Sudanese authorities to chase refugees out of the refugee camp Otash. The camp is situated near South Darfur’s capital Nyala and houses 60,000 refugees. U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, John Holmes, declared that these involuntary relocations are violating U.N. agreements with Sudan. Inside the camps, guns are cheap, tensions and violence are mounting. Most of the IDPs are women, children and youth. Since April 2006 there have been 120,000 newly displaced children. Many of the youth feel desperate, because they harbour no hope to return in their destroyed villages. Escalation of violence in Darfur threatens aid operation An upsurge of banditry further complicated all humanitarian aid operations in western Sudan. Chaos is looming as violence increases and public order collapses. 4.2 million civilians in Darfur are currently relying on humanitarian aid. Since the end of September 2007 the dangers and obstacles relief agencies in Darfur are facing have continued to increase. Aid agencies were only able to provide minimal assistance to major IDP camps in North and South Darfur due to ongoing insecurity. Between January and November 2007 at least 74 humanitarian transports were attacked and 128 vehicles hijacked. Some 131 humanitarian staff was kidnapped and 12 aid workers were killed. Many trucking A/HRC/7/NGO/55 page 4 companies refuse to send in more vehicles because of the upsurge in violence and kidnappings. In the first two months of the year 2008 this alarming trend worsened sharply, endangering the activities of many aid agencies. Some humanitarian organisations have meanwhile left western Sudan due to the issue of insecurity and the lack of access to those in need. UNAMID deployment has been obstructed On July 31, 2007, the UN Security Council authorised a hybrid United Nations / African Union peacekeeping operation (UNAMID) in western Sudan. Six months later, little, if any, additional capacity has been deployed or is on the horizon to ensure an effective protection of the civilian population. The government of Sudan has systematically obstructed the deployment of UNAMID in at least five ways. Khartoum failed for more than two months to formally approve the list of UNAMID troop contributions. Troop proposals from Nepal, the Scandinavian countries and Thailand were rejected, insisting that only African troops were welcome. The land allocation for new bases has taken months. Furthermore, the government refused to grant permissions for new troops to fly at night and imposed curfews near some bases. Several times Khartoum tried to impose restrictions on the communication network of UNAMID. Society for Threatened Peoples calls on the Human Rights Council to: • condemn the crimes against humanity committed by the Sudanese army and its allied militia, the abuses of the civilian population as well as the violations of the humanitarian ceasefire agreement, • urge the Sudanese government to ensure free access and protection for aid agencies, • insist on an immediate end of the persecutions, slaughter and “ethnic cleansing”, • urge the Sudanese government to refrain from any obstruction of the UNAMID deployment to ensure the protection of the civilian population, • call on the Sudanese government to end impunity for crimes committed in Darfur and to fully cooperate with the International Criminal Court in The Hague, • urge the international community to enhance a new negotiation of the Darfur Peace Agreement involving all conflict parties, • call on the international community to strengthen its political pressure on the Sudanese government in order to stop crimes against humanity in Darfur.
Recommended publications
  • Darfur Genocide
    Darfur genocide Berkeley Model United Nations Welcome Letter Hi everyone! Welcome to the Darfur Historical Crisis committee. My name is Laura Nguyen and I will be your head chair for BMUN 69. This committee will take place from roughly 2006 to 2010. Although we will all be in the same physical chamber, you can imagine that committee is an amalgamation of peace conferences, UN meetings, private Janjaweed or SLM meetings, etc. with the goal of preventing the Darfur Genocide and ending the War in Darfur. To be honest, I was initially wary of choosing the genocide in Darfur as this committee’s topic; people in Darfur. I also understood that in order for this to be educationally stimulating for you all, some characters who committed atrocious war crimes had to be included in debate. That being said, I chose to move on with this topic because I trust you are all responsible and intelligent, and that you will treat Darfur with respect. The War in Darfur and the ensuing genocide are grim reminders of the violence that is easily born from intolerance. Equally regrettable are the in Africa and the Middle East are woefully inadequate for what Darfur truly needs. I hope that understanding those failures and engaging with the ways we could’ve avoided them helps you all grow and become better leaders and thinkers. My best advice for you is to get familiar with the historical processes by which ethnic brave, be creative, and have fun! A little bit about me (she/her) — I’m currently a third-year at Cal majoring in Sociology and minoring in Data Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Report January 2014
    منظمة حقوق اﻻنسان والتنمية Human Rights and Development Organization (HUDO) South Kordufan / Nuba Mountains Monthly Report (January 2014) Introduction: In this month Sudan government become very much repressive by reinforcing all rejected Laws, for the first time it has reinforced the Armed Forces Law amended in June last year, this laws allows prosecution of civilians before military courts. It has also activated other laws of the Voluntary Work Act for the year 2006 which gives the Minister the right to do whatever suits him. Under these laws the minister suspended the activities of the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC), this move band more than 1.5 million people from the service of ICRC mostly in Darfur. Despite the crimes they committed in Darfur and their participation in the fighting in Southern Kordofan recently, the Janjaweed militias are now terrorizing civilians in Al Obeid before those who created them in Darfur and brought them to Kordofan. Security Situation: Sudanese authority continues air bombardment in the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile, Kauda area (SPLA control) has been aggressively bombarded during January this year. The security situation is worsening in Kordofan Al Obeid due to the presence of the Janjaweed after being chased from battle field in Southern Kordofan. Currently they are rapping women, looting civilians’ properties and attacking people on daily bases in Al Obeid. Political Development: The President’s recent statement which people had been optimistically awaiting for was very disappointing; it was expected to bring new changes in Sudanese politics but was sarcasm instead. Peace talks between Sudan Government and SPLM- N is due to resume in February with a hope of pushing the implementation of the previous agreements and opening the paths for relief to reach the war affected people in Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile pending for the final and comprehensive settlement of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Report 2010 Public Information and Documentation Section | Outreach Unit Foreword
    Outreach Report 2010 Public Information and Documentation Section | Outreach Unit Foreword This is the fourth Outreach Report published by my office since the Outreach Unit of the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in 2007. It presents the work carried out from 1 October 2009 to 1 October 2010 by ICC Outreach Unit staff members at the seat of the Court in The Hague, and in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the Central African Republic (CAR), and Kenya. It also includes the work of the Outreach Unit in Chad and other countries where large groups of Sudanese populations are currently residing. The report outlines many of the activities conducted during this period and the results achieved, as well as the contextual judicial and other factors influencing our work, challenges faced along the way, and the plans for going forward. The report is also a demonstration of the hard work and dedication of my staff, both at headquarters and in the field. They have contributed to further advance our plans ICC Registrar Silvana Arbia ©ICC-CPI/Max Koot to make justice meaningful among communities affected by the crimes in situations and cases brought before the Court. Over the past reporting period, the Registry has responded to a series of emerging challenges while maintaining its efforts to counter misconceptions, make proceedings accessible, and create realistic expectations of the Court’s work among affected communities. Our rapid response capacity was once again tested this year in explaining and clarifying certain judicial decisions. My office was able to deploy an interdisciplinary team in Kenya before Pre-Trial Chamber I decided to grant the Prosecutor approval to investigate alleged crimes committed in the territory of that country in relation with the post-election violence of 2007 and 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Practice of the UN Security
    SELECTED PRACTISE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL IN RELATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND THE ROME STATUTE SYSTEM (1998-2012) 3nd Update: 10 October 2012 Contents: 1. Highlights on the fight against impunity through referrals by the Security Council under Article 13 of the Rome Statute ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Côte d’Ivoire .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Darfur, Sudan ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Democratic Republic of the Congo .................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Gaza ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Kenya ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Libya ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Mali .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.8 Myanmar/Burma .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SCSL Press Clippings
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE PRESS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Press and Public Affairs Office as at: Thursday, 3 May 2007 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News Issa Sesay Commences His Defence Today / Awoko Page 3 AI Blasts Judiciary / For di People Page 4 International News Date of Taylor trial announced / Legalbrief Today Page 5 UNMIL Public Information Office Media Summary / UNMIL Pages 6-8 ICC issues Darfur arrest warrants / BBC Pages 9-10 Warrants of Arrest for the Minister of State for Humanitarian Affairs of Sudan…/ ICC Pages 11-12 3 Awoko Thursday, 3 May 2007 4 For di People Thursday, 3 May 2007 5 Legalbrief Today Thursday, 3 May 2007 http://www.legalbrief.co.za/article.php?story=20070503082412777 Date of Taylor trial announced Published in: Legalbrief Today Date: Thu 03 May 2007 Category: Criminal Issue No: 1816 Acting Registrar Herman von Hebel, of the UN backed Special Court for Sierra Leone, says former President Charles Taylor's war crimes trial is expected to start on June 4 at The Hague at the premises of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Although the ICC is to be used, he says in a report in the Concord Times, Taylor will remain within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and the proceedings will conform with its own. ‘ Full Concord Times report 6 United Nations Nations Unies United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) UNMIL Public Information Office Media Summary 02 May 2007 [The media summaries and press clips do not necessarily represent the views of UNMIL.] International Clips on Liberia Mano River Union Leaders End Meeting Monrovia, May 02, 2007 (Liberia Government/All Africa Global Media via COMTEX) --The Heads of the State of the Mano River Union Monday concluded their summit in Conakry, Guinea geared towards fostering peace and cooperation within the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan: Justice, Peace and the Icc
    SUDAN: JUSTICE, PEACE AND THE ICC Africa Report N°152 – 17 July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. DARFUR AND THE ICC................................................................................................. 2 A. THE CRIMES COMMITTED IN DARFUR ..........................................................................................3 B. INTERNATIONAL REACTION .........................................................................................................5 III. REACTIONS TO THE APPLICATION FOR BASHIR’S ARREST ......................... 7 A. DIVISIONS WITHIN THE NCP AND THE ISLAMIC MOVEMENT .......................................................8 B. THE NCP ARGUMENT AGAINST ICC JURISDICTION ...................................................................10 C. A FAILED POLITICAL RESPONSE ................................................................................................12 D. THE NCP AND ARTICLE 16........................................................................................................15 1. Mobilisation of regional support................................................................................................15 2. Negotiations with the P5............................................................................................................16 IV. AFTER BASHIR’S INDICTMENT .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur in February 2008
    Sudan HUMAN “They Shot at Us as We Fled” RIGHTS Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur WATCH “They Shot at Us as We Fled” Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-320-X Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org May 2008 1-56432-320-X “They Shot at Us as We Fled” Government Attacks on Civilians in West Darfur in February 2008 Map of Northern West Darfur.................................................................................... 1 I. Summary...............................................................................................................2 II. Recommendations .............................................................................................. 6 To the Sudanese government............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Politics of Justice at the International Criminal Court
    PRIF Report No. 127 Growing Up Rough: The Changing Politics of Justice at the International Criminal Court Caroline Fehl the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) 2014 Correspondence to: PRIF (HSFK) Baseler Straße 27-31 60329 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone: +49(0)69 95 91 04-0 Fax: +49(0)69 55 84 81 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-3-942532-76-1 Euro 10,-- Summary The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established at The Hague in 2002 with a mandate to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. The ICC operates as a court of “last resort” that becomes active only when national governments are unwilling or unable to prosecute relevant crimes. Its jurisdiction is subject to various conditions, and can be triggered by the referral of a “situation” to the Court by the UN Security Council, by a state party referral, or through a proprio motu investigation initiated by the ICC Prosecutor. Since taking up its work in 2002, the ICC has investigated nine situations, held six trials of individuals and handed down two convictions. In addition, it has conducted 12 preliminary examinations that have not resulted in the opening of official investigations. All investigations and trials to date have focused on African countries. From its inception, the ICC has been a highly contested institution-building project. Already the negotiations about its statute were marked by heated controversies among participating states. Following the statute’s entry into force, political debates have continued to surround the Court’s relationship with member and non-member states as well as its investigations, arrest warrants and trials have continued to be the subject of political debates.
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.6778 Security Council Provisional Asdfsixty-Seventh Year 6778Th Meeting Tuesday, 5 June 2012, 10 A.M
    United Nations S/PV.6778 Security Council Provisional asdfSixty-seventh year 6778th meeting Tuesday, 5 June 2012, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Li Baodong ....................................... (China) Members: Azerbaijan ........................................... Mr. Mehdiyev Colombia ............................................ Mr. Osorio France ............................................... Mr. Briens Germany ............................................. Mr. Wittig Guatemala ........................................... Mr. Rosenthal India ................................................ Mr. Hardeep Singh Puri Morocco ............................................. Mr. Bouchaara Pakistan ............................................. Mr. Tarar Portugal ............................................. Mr. Cabral Russian Federation ..................................... Mr. Karev South Africa . Mr. Mashabane Togo ................................................ Mr. Menan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ........ Mr. McKell United States of America ................................ Mr. DeLaurentis Agenda Reports of the Secretary-General on the Sudan This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing on Torture in Sudan[1]
    Briefing paper (Post)-Covid19 era in Sudan: The urgency to unravel the torture and inhuman treatments system one year after the Transition The Covid-19 crisis is appearing in many African countries, including Sudan, as a revealing crisis which calls particular attention to the preexisting and worrying situation, mainly in the prison system marred by overcrowding, insufficient and inadequate sanitation and the lack of resources. In Sudan, torture and inhuman treatments have been used as a governing tool and prisons as dying houses for political activists and civil society organisation leaders. This briefing identifies priorities for torture and reform in Sudan by the transitional government including law reform, accountability, rehabilitation and compensation of torture victims. It also critically looks at the measures adopted to prevent the propagation of Covid-19 in detention facilities and the capacity of authorities to protect the health of detainees. July 2020 1 Table of Contents 1. Overview of Torture and ill-treatments in Sudan ............................................................. 3 2. Dismantling the torturous legal and institutional framework: low-hanging fruit? ............ 4 a. Repealing torture laws: reassuring little steps especially for women ......................................... 4 b. National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) and the end of an ogre? ................................ 5 3. Keeping the legal roots of torture in Sudan: driving the changes with the handbrake? .... 6 a. Persisting legal structure
    [Show full text]
  • Grojil 6(1) (2018), 146-160 Implies That Local Remedies Had Been Exhausted
    Groningen Journal of International Law, vol 6(1): Open Submissions Attribution Commons Creative the under licensed is work This ICC and Afrocentrism: The Laws, Politics and Biases in Global Criminal Justice Nwafor Ndubuisi* Mukoro Benjamin Onoriode** DOI: 10.21827/5b51d55740ab8 Keywords INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT; AFRICA; BIAS; WITHDRAWAL; CONTINUED RELEVANCE - NonCommercial Abstract The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established to prosecute the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. However, since its inception, the Court has been wholly focused on Africa in terms of indictments and trials. - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by visit license, this of copy a view To License. International 4.0 NoDerivatives This has led many Africans, including state leaders, to question the integrity of the Court. While most explanations of the ICC’s focus on Africa have bordered on the political, this work attempts to find out the reason for the Court’s slant towards Africa in the very Statute by which it was established. Therefore, this paper finds that of the four broad crimes that the ICC has jurisdiction to try, three (crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide) are more likely to occur in Africa, while the fourth (the crime of aggression), will more likely be perpetrated by or at the instigation of individuals in powerful States. Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) was set up by the international community to deal with cases involving ‘the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole’.1 African countries played a very important role in bringing the Court into existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Serious International Crimes Committed in Sudan
    Justice for Serious International Crimes Committed in Sudan Questions and Answers Following months of protests, Sudan’s president for 30 years, Omar al-Bashir, was ousted in April 2019 and replaced by a transitional military council. Negotiations between the military leaders and opposition groups led in August to the formation of a transitional government headed by a “sovereign council,” with military and civilian members. The agreement to form the transitional government provides for a national independent investigation into the crackdown by government security forces on peaceful protesters on June 3, 2019 in Khartoum – the bloodiest attack on protesters in the period before and after al- Bashir’s ouster. The agreement also calls for accountability for all past abuses under the al- Bashir government. In September 2019 the transitional government appointed the national investigation committee for the June 3 events. The attorney general meanwhile announced efforts to investigate numerous past abuses and has prosecuted al-Bashir and other leaders on corruption charges. In February 2020, Sudanese authorities expressed their commitment to cooperate with the International Criminal Court (ICC), which had outstanding arrest warrants for five Sudanese individuals, including al-Bashir, for alleged genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity committed in Darfur. On June 9, one suspect, Ali Kosheib (also spelled Kushayb), surrendered himself to the ICC in the Central African Republic. This was a landmark development toward justice for victims of government-backed atrocities committed in Darfur. Steps by Sudanese officials in support of justice are important and positive. But much more is needed for Sudanese authorities to seize the opportunity the transition offers to make a break from the country’s past of widespread atrocity crimes committed with impunity.
    [Show full text]