DOCSLIB.ORG

Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure Journal of Orthopaedics 16 (2019) 224–229 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Orthopaedics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jor Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Failure rate and patients-reported outcomes at 4–11 years of follow up T ∗ Piero Volpia, , Alessandro Quagliaa, Giulia Carimatia, Marco Gallib, Rocco Papaliac, Stefano Petrilloc a Knee Surgery and Sports Traumatology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy b Centre of Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopic Surgery, Galeazzi Orthopaedics Institution of Milan, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy c Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro Del Portillo, 200, 00128, Trigoria, Rome, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that single bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Double bundle reconstruction (SB-ACLr), which represents the gold standard for the management of ACL lesions, is not suffi- Anterior cruciate ligament cient to completely restore the rotational stability and resistance to valgus stress of the knee. Arthroscopy Purpose: To evaluate the failure rate and patients reported outcomes at a long-term follow-up of double bundle Failure anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLr). Clinical outcomes Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Materials and methods: The database of arthroscopic DB-ACLr procedures performed from 2006 to 2015 at our Institution was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were screened for eligibility according to the following in- clusion criteria: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesion, positive anterior drawer test and/or Lachman test; age ≤ 45 years at the time of surgery; DB-ACLr with autologous hamstrings, minimum follow up of 24 months. Patients were excluded if they presented associated lesions of the knee preoperatively or at the time of surgery, expect for meniscal lesions, or in case of inability to complete clinical questionnaires. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a mean follow up of 95.4 ± 21.9 months (range 51–129 months; median 98 months) using the Tegner-Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score. Failures were defined as Tegner-Lysholm score ≤65 points, and were confirmed with MRI. Results: 58 (81.7%) male and 13 (18.3%) female patients (mean age 29.7 ± 7.8 years) were included in the study. 2 (2.8%, 95% CI 0.3–9.8%) patients had a failure of DB-ACLr both occurred after a sports trauma. The IKDC subjective score was statically better in patients younger than 30 years. Tegner-Lysholm and IKDC sub- jective score were statistically better in professional athletes and in patients with isolated medial or lateral meniscus lesion instead of combined medial and lateral meniscus lesion. Conclusion: DB-ACLr technique provides excellent clinical results at a long term follow-up. Low failure rate and high percentage of return to sports participation at the same pre-injury level was found in our cohort of patients. 1. Introduction active patients.25 The aim of surgery is to restore the stability of the knee, allowing the return to sports participation, and preventing the The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is essential for the knee joint development of associated lesions7 such as meniscal or collateral liga- biomechanics and function.2 It efforts resistance to anterior dislocation ments tears,1 chondral injuries,32 fractures and early osteoarthritis.33 of the tibia,6 providing proprioception and rotational stability of the Anatomical studies have shown that the ACL is made of two bun- knee.5 dles, the antero-medial and postero-lateral.9,19,35 The single bundle In several sports activities requiring rotational motions or jumping (SB) ACL reconstruction (SB-ACLr) technique represents the gold like soccer, rugby, basketball, volleyball or skiing, the knee sustains standard for the management of ACL lesions.14 However, several stu- high mechanical loads and the ACL is more prone to injury.3,12 Surgical dies have demonstrated that, despite its capacities to restore stability in reconstruction of ACL lesions is often necessary, especially in young and the antero-posterior plane, SB-ACLr is not sufficient to completely ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (P. Volpi), [email protected] (A. Quaglia), [email protected] (G. Carimati), [email protected] (M. Galli), [email protected] (R. Papalia), [email protected] (S. Petrillo). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.021 Received 30 August 2018; Accepted 17 February 2019 Available online 28 February 2019 0972-978X/ © 2019 Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd on behalf of Prof. PK Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. P. Volpi, et al. Journal of Orthopaedics 16 (2019) 224–229 restore the rotational stability and resistance to valgus stress11,24 of the lower scores indicating the worst function of the knee. knee. Moreover, 15–25% of unsatisfactory results were recorded, with 4 some patients reporting persistent pain or instability. 2.4. Imaging Double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction (DB-ACLr) technique was proposed to reproduce a more anatomic and functional ligament, re- All patients underwent preoperative MRI scans to diagnose ACL constructing both the ACL bundles. Various studies have shown a su- injury and associated lesions. Furthermore, a standard pre-operative periority of DB-ACLr respect to SB technique to restore rotatory stability radiographic assessment of the knee was performed in all patients using 22,23,30 ff of the knee, while other studies found no di erences between the antero-posterior, lateral and axillary view. In all patients with poor two procedures in term of outcomes, complications and failure results according to Tegner-Lysholm score and IKDC score, a MRI 17,18 rate. evaluation of the operated knee was performed at the final follow up. The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the failure rate of DB-ACLr technique at a long term follow-up. In our hypothesis, DB- 2.5. Surgical procedure ACLr presents a failure rate not superior to 3%. Moreover, we have assessed the clinical outcomes and return to sports participation ac- The arthroscopic DB-ACLr technique has been previously de- cording to patients age, meniscal lesions and level of pre-injury sports scribed.31 All the surgical procedures were performed by the senior full- activity at the time of surgery. trained knee surgeon (P.V.). The patient, under spinal anesthesia, is placed in supine position 2. Materials and methods with the inferior limb on a leg holder permitting knee movement from 0° to 110°. A diagnostic arthroscopy is firstly performed to evaluate the 2.1. Ethics ACL rupture and to treat any meniscal lesion. In all patients presenting a meniscal lesion (medial or lateral or combined), a partial me- The ethics review board of our institution approved the study. niscectomy was performed preserving the more healthy meniscal tissue as possible. 2.2. Patient enrolment Then, both semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (G) tendons are har- vested using a small oblique anteromedial (AM) incision at the level of We retrospectively reviewed the database of arthroscopic DB-ACLr the pes anserinus. Both tendons were doubled, and their diameters procedures performed at our Institution from January 2006 to should be minimum 5–6 mm for the G tendon, and 6–7 mm for the ST December 2015. A total of 162 DB-ACLr procedures were performed in tendon. 161 patients. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. Two tibial tunnels were created with a calibrated tibial guide 22 patients were excluded because of short term follow up, while (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) specifically designed by the senior sur- other 30 patients were not compliant with the inclusion/exclusion geon to perform this technique. Then, the correct position of the fe- criteria. The remaining 109 patients were contacted telephonically. 71 moral tunnels is identified using a Kirschner wire introduced into the of them accepted our invitation and were enrolled in the study. joint through the tibial tunnels. The PL femoral socket is created at a depth of 30 mm by passing 2.3. Clinical evaluation through the PL tibial tunnel, while the AM femoral half-tunnel is cre- ated at a depth of 35 mm by passing through the AM tibial tunnel. 2 Clinical outcomes were assessed at the final follow up using the sutures are used to pass the graft (Fig. 1). Tegner-Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score. Two blinded The G was used for the PL, while the ST was used for the AM. After surgeons administered both questionnaires. The mathematical average placement and pretensioning of the grafts proximally, both PL and AM fi ff of the results obtained by each examiner was used for statistical pur- bundles are xed by inserting two di erent pins through a cannula, fi pose. while PL and AM bundles are distally xed separately with a bioscrew. fi The Tegner-Lysholm score29 is a knee rating scale made of 8 sec- The xation of the PL and AM bundle was performed with the knee fl fi tions, evaluating post-operative limp, pain, locking, stair-climbing ca- exed at 10° and 45° respectively. The tension of the graft was nally pacity, necessity of support, instability, swelling, and squatting capa- tested with a probe (Fig. 2). city. The final score ranges from 0 to 100, and it can be classified as excellent (> 90 points), good (84–90 points), fair (65–83 points), or 2.6. Postoperative management poor (< 65 points). We have assumed as a failure a Tegner-Lysholm score ≤65 points. Postoperative management and rehabilitation protocol was the The IKDC subjective score15 is a knee rating scale made of 10 sec- same in all patients. Full weight bearing was allowed from the day after tions, evaluating post-operative knee pain, stiffness and swallowing, surgery using two crutches.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Esxam
    Pearls in the Musculoskeletal Exam Frank Caruso MPS, PA-C, EMT-P Skin, Bones, Hearts & Private Parts 2019 Examination Key Points • Area that needs to be examined, gown your patients - well exposed • Understand normal functional anatomy • Observe normal activity • Palpation • Range of Motion • Strength/neuro-vascular assessment • Special Tests General Exam Musculoskeletal Overview Physical Exam Preview Watch Your Patients Walk!! Inspection • Posture – Erectness – Symmetry – Alignment • Skin and subcutaneous tissues – Swelling – Redness – Masses Inspection • Extremities – Size – Deformities – Enlargement – Alignment – Contour – Symmetry Inspection • Muscles – Bilateral symmetry – Hypertrophy – Atrophy – Fasciculations – Spasms Palpation • Palpate bones, joints, and surrounding muscles for the following: – Heat – Tenderness – Swelling – Fluctuation – Crepitus – Resistance to pressure – Muscle tone Muscles • Size and strength affected by the following: – Genetics – Exercise – Nutrition • Muscles move joints through range of motion (ROM). Muscle Strength • Compare bilateral muscles – Strength – Symmetry – Equality – Resistance End Feel Think About It!! • The sensation the examiner feels in the joint as it reaches the end of the range of motion of each passive movement • Bone to bone: This is hard, unyielding – normal would be elbow extension. • Soft–tissue approximation: yielding compression that stops further movement – elbow and knee flexion. End Feel • Tissue stretch: hard – springy type of movement with a slight give – toward the end of range of motion – most common type of normal end feel : knee extension and metacarpophalangeal joint extension. Abnormal End Feel • Muscle spasm: invoked by movement with a sudden dramatic arrest of movement often accompanied by pain - sudden hard – “vibrant twang” • Capsular: Similar to tissue stretch but it does not occur where one would expect – range of motion usually reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Management of Sports Injuries in Children
    2019 Frontiers in Pediatrics Sports Medicine Mini-Symposium Presented by MUSC Health Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Panel of Experts Michael J. Barr, PT, DPT, MSR Sports Medicine Manager MUSC Health Sports Medicine Alec DeCastro, MD Assistant Professor CAQ Sports Medicine Director, MUSC/Trident Family Medicine Residency MUSC Health Sports Medicine MUSC Department of Family Medicine Harris S. Slone, MD Associate Professor Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine MUSC Health Sports Medicine MUSC Department of Orthopaedics Sports Medicine Breakout Group Leaders Aaron Brown, ATC Athletic Trainer MUSC Health Sports Medicine Amelia Brown, MS, ATC Athletic Trainer MUSC Health Sports Medicine Brittney Lang, MS, ATC Athletic Trainer MUSC Health Sports Medicine Bobby Weisenberger, MS, ATC, PES Athletic Trainer MUSC Health Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Schedule Approximate Timeline: 2:00: Introduction – Michael Barr, PT, DPT, MSR – Sports Medicine Manager 2:05: Ankle Case Report – Harris Slone, MD 2:20: Knee Case Report – Harris Slone, MD 2:35: Shoulder Instability Case Report – Michael Barr, PT, DPT, MSR 2:50: Back Case Report – Alec DeCastro, MD 3:05: High BP Case Report – Alec DeCastro, MD 3:20: Hands On Practice of Exam Techniques – All + Athletic Trainers 3:50: Question/Answer Open Forum – All 4:00: End Sports Medicine Disclosers No relevant financial disclosers Sports Medicine Learning Objectives Learning Objectives: 1. Describe mechanisms of injury and clinical presentation for common pediatric sports related injuries of the ankle, knee, back and shoulder. 2. Demonstrate examination techniques to support the diagnosis of common pediatric sports related injuries of the ankle, knee, back and shoulder 3. Determine what imaging studies should be ordered and when to refer to a sports med/orthopaedic surgeon or to physical therapy 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of the Knee
    Examination of the Knee The Examination For every joint of the lower extremity always begin with the patient in standing IN STANDING INSPECTION 1. Cutaneous Structures: Look for Erythema, scarring, bruising, and swelling in the following areas: a. Peripatellar grooves b. Suprapatellar bursa c. Prepatellar bursa d. Infrapatellar tendon e. Anserine bursa f. Popliteal fossa 2. Muscle & Soft Tissue: a. Quadriceps atrophy b. Hamstring atrophy c. Calf atrophy 3. Bones & Alignment: a. Patella position (Alta, Baha, Winking, Frog eyed), b. Varus or Valgus alignment c. Flexion contracture or Genu recurvatum RANGE OF MOTION - ACTIVE Standing is the best opportunity to assess active range of motion of the knee. 1. Ask the patient to squat into a deep knee bend. Both knees should bend symmetrically. 2. Ask the patient to then stand and extend the knee fully – lock the knee. The knee should straighten to 0 degrees of extension. Some people have increased extension referred to as genu recurvatum. GAIT 1. Look for a short stance phase on the affected limb and an awkward gait if a concomitant leg length discrepancy 2. Look for turning on block 3. Screening 1. Walk on the toes 2. Walk on the heels 3. Squat down – Active Range of Motion testing SPECIAL TESTS 1. Leg Length Discrepancy a. Look at patients back for evidence of a functional scoliosis b. Place your hands on the patients Iliac crests looking for inequality which may mean a leg length discrepancy IN SITTING NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION 1. Test the reflexes a. L4 – Quadriceps reflex VASCULAR EXAMINATION 1. Feel for the posterior tibial artery SUPINE POSITION INSPECTION 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SIMMONDS TEST:  Patient Is Prone  Doctor Flexes the Patients Knee to 90 Degrees  Doctor Squeezes the Patient’S Calf
    Clinical Orthopedic Testing Review SIMMONDS TEST: Patient is prone Doctor flexes the patients knee to 90 degrees Doctor squeezes the patient’s calf. Classical response: Failure of ankle plantarflexion Classical Importance= torn Achilles tendon Test is done bilaterally ACHILLES TAP: Patient is prone Doctor flexes the patient’s knee to 90 degree Doctor dorsiflexes the ankle and then strikes the Achilles tendon with a percussion hammer Classical response: Plantar response Classical Importance= Intact Achilles tendon Test is done bilaterally FOOT DRAWER TEST: Patient is supine with their ankles off the edge of the examination table Doctor grasps the heel of the ankle being tested with one hand and the tibia just above the ankle with the other. Doctor applies and anterior to posterior and then a posterior to anterior sheer force. Classical response: Anterior or posterior translation of the ankle Classical Importance= Anterior talofibular or posterior talofibular ligament laxity. Test is done bilaterally LATERAL STABILITY TEST: Patient is supine Doctor grasps the tibia with one hand and the foot with the other. Doctor rotates the foot into inversion Classical response: Excessive inversion Classical Importance= Anterior talofibular ligament sprain Test is done bilaterally MEDIAL STABILITY TEST: Patient is supine Doctor grasps the tibia with one hand and the foot with the other Doctor rotates the foot into eversion Classical response: Excessive eversion Classical Importance= Deltoid ligament sprain Test is done bilaterally 1 Clinical Orthopedic Testing Review KLEIGER’S TEST: Patient is seated with the legs and feet dangling off the edge of the examination table. Doctor grasps the patient’s foot while stabilizing the tibia with the other hand Doctor pulls the ankle laterally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Extremity Exam for the Family Practitioner
    Melinda A. Scott, D.O. THE LOWER EXTREMITY Orthopedic Associates of EXAM FOR THE FAMILY Dayton Board Certified in Primary Care PRACTITIONER Sports Medicine GOALS Identify landmarks necessary for exam of the lower extremity Review techniques for a quick but thorough exam Be familiar with normal findings and range of motion Review some special maneuvers and abnormal findings Review common diagnoses PRE-TEST QUESTIONS 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% If a patient has hip arthritis, where will he or she typically complain of pain? A. Buttock B. Low back C. Lateral hip D. Groin E. Posterior thigh 10 A. B. C. D. E. Countdown PRE-TEST QUESTIONS A positive straight leg raise test indicates 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% that the patient’s hip pain is from a A. Radicular/sciatic etiology B. Hip joint pathology C. Bursitis D. Tight Hamstrings E. Weak hip flexors 10 Countdown A. B. C. D. E. PRE-TEST QUESTIONS A positive McMurray’s tests is indicative of 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% a possible A. ACL tear B. MCL tear C. Patellar dislocation D. Joint effusion E. Meniscus tear 10 Countdown A. B. C. D. E. PRE-TEST QUESTIONS Anterior drawer test on the knee is performed with the knee in 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% A. 30 degrees flexion B. 90 degrees flexion C. Full extension D. 45 degrees flexion E. 130 degrees flexion 10 Countdown A. B. C. D. E. PRE-TEST QUESTIONS A positive squeeze test during an ankle 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% exam is indicative of A. Syndesmotic injury B.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Tests for Differential Diagnosis What Are the Metrics of Diagnosis?
    9/6/2018 Best Tests for Differential Diagnosis What are the Metrics Chad Cook PhD, PT, MBA, FAAOMPT of Diagnosis? Professor and Program Director Duke University Duke Clinical Research Institute For Diagnosis, There are Analytic Diagnostic Test Metrics Metrics • Diagnostic accuracy • Reliability • Diagnostic accuracy relates to the ability of • Sensitivity a test to discriminate between the target condition and another competing condition. • Specificity • Positive and Negative Predictive Value • Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios Does Reliability Matter? Sensitivity and Specificity No worries, The you will Sensitivity: Percentage of people who test positive for a condition • be fine is fatal specific disease among a group of people who have the disease • Specificity: Percentage of people who test negative for a specific disease among a group of people who do not have the disease Kappa Intraclass Correlation www.zillowblog.com Coefficient 5 1 9/6/2018 Sensitivity Example Specificity Example • 50 patients with arm pain associated • 50 patients with no arm pain with cervical radiculopathy associated with a cervical strain • Test was positive in 40 of the 50 • Test was positive in 5 of the 50 cases cases • Sensitivity = 40/50 or 80% • Specificity = 45/50 or 90% • Correct 80% of the time in cases • Correct 90% of the time in cases that were cervical radiculopathy that were NOT cervical radiculopathy http://www.triggerpointbook.com/infrasp2.gif http://www.triggerpointbook.com/infrasp2.gif Likelihood Ratios • A high LR+ influences post-test probability with a positive finding • A value of >1 rules in a diagnosis • A low LR- influences post-test probability with a negative finding • A value closer to 0 is best and rules out Bossuyt P, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures - a Report of the American Societyarchived of Nuclear Cardiology Quality Assurance Committee
    Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines: Advanced Imaging Imaging Program Guidelines EffectiveDate: October 29, 2018 Proprietary Guideline Last Revised Last Reviewed Administrative 07-26-2016 07-26-2016 Head and Neck 11-01-2016 08-15-2017 Chest 03-01-2018 03-01-2018 Cardiac 11-14-2017 11-14-2017 Abdomen and Pelvis 03-01-2018 03-01-2018 Spine 07-26-2016 02-14-2017 Extremity 07-26-2016 09-22-2017 PET or PET/CT 09-07-2017 09-07-2017 MRI Bone Marrow Blood Supply 08-27-2015 07-26-2016 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) 06-19-2012 07-26-2016 Quantitative CT (QCT) Bone Mineral Densitometry 11-01-2016 11-01-2016 ARCHIVED 8600 W Bryn Mawr Avenue South Tower – Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60631 P. 773.864.4600 Copyright © 2018. AIM Specialty Health. All Rights Reserved www.aimspecialtyhealth.com Table of Contents Description and Application of the Guidelines ........................................................................4 Administrative Guidelines ........................................................................................................5 Ordering of Multiple Studies ...................................................................................................................................5 Pre-test Requirements ...........................................................................................................................................6 Head & Neck Imaging ...............................................................................................................7 CT of the Head .......................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Maneuvers • Strength Testing • Palpation 4
    Foot and Ankle Physical Exam 1. Gait analysis Physical Exam 2. Examination Standing The Big Picture: • Alignment • Swelling - Gait analysis 3. Examination Sitting - Exam standing • Neurovascular exam - Exam sitting • Skin • Range-of-motion / stability - Provocative maneuvers • Strength testing • Palpation 4. Provocative maneuvers Gait Gait Analysis - Begins and ends with heel strike of same foot - Stance: heel strike → foot flat → toe off (push-off) Stride length: Distance between two Gait Intervals of Stance ipsilateral heel strikes 1st Interval: Heel strike → foot flat Step length: Distance between heel strikes Eccentric tib ant contraction of opposing limbs 2nd Interval: Foot flat → midstance Walking: One foot always on ground Eccentric gastrocs contraction 3rd Interval: Midstance → Toe off Running: Brief period with both feet of Concentric gastrocs contraction the ground Walking velocity: Factor of stride length and (Swing: Concentric tib ant contraction) cadence Pathologic Gait Gait analysis . Antalgic: Shortened stance on painful side 1. Overall alignment Steppage: Leg lifts higher to clear ground 2. Heel strike Calcaneal: Exaggerated heel weight-bearing • Heel contact? . posterior weakness • Foot slap? Waddling: Broad-based, pelvis drops towards 3. Midstance raised leg during swing • arch collapse? . proximal myopathy • Valgus/varus thrust? Trandelenburg: Trunk towards weak 4. Push-off side during stance 5. Observe from front, back, and side . abductor weakness Walk around the patient . Exam Standing Understand the foot as a tripod . Foot as Tripod . Ground pressure Pes planus: ~ evenly distributed: - Medial overload st -1 metatarsal head Pes cavus: - Lesser metatarsals - Lateral overload - Heel Pes planus 1. Pes planus 2. Pes planovalgus 3. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity 4. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Uživatel:Zef/Output18
    Uživatel:Zef/output18 < Uživatel:Zef rozřadit, rozdělit na více článků/poznávaček; Název !! Klinický obraz !! Choroba !! Autor Bárányho manévr; Bonnetův manévr; Brudzinského manévr; Fournierův manévr; Fromentův manévr; Heimlichův manévr; Jendrassikův manévr; Kernigův manévr; Lasčgueův manévr; Müllerův manévr; Scanzoniho manévr; Schoberův manévr; Stiborův manévr; Thomayerův manévr; Valsalvův manévr; Beckwithova známka; Sehrtova známka; Simonova známka; Svěšnikovova známka; Wydlerova známka; Antonovo znamení; Apleyovo znamení; Battleho znamení; Blumbergovo znamení; Böhlerovo znamení; Courvoisierovo znamení; Cullenovo znamení; Danceovo znamení; Delbetovo znamení; Ewartovo znamení; Forchheimerovo znamení; Gaussovo znamení; Goodellovo znamení; Grey-Turnerovo znamení; Griesingerovo znamení; Guddenovo znamení; Guistovo znamení; Gunnovo znamení; Hertogheovo znamení; Homansovo znamení; Kehrerovo znamení; Leserovo-Trélatovo znamení; Loewenbergerovo znamení; Minorovo znamení; Murphyho znamení; Nobleovo znamení; Payrovo znamení; Pembertonovo znamení; Pinsovo znamení; Pleniesovo znamení; Pléniesovo znamení; Prehnovo znamení; Rovsingovo znamení; Salusovo znamení; Sicardovo znamení; Stellwagovo znamení; Thomayerovo znamení; Wahlovo znamení; Wegnerovo znamení; Zohlenovo znamení; Brachtův hmat; Credého hmat; Dessaignes ; Esmarchův hmat; Fritschův hmat; Hamiltonův hmat; Hippokratův hmat; Kristellerův hmat; Leopoldovy hmat; Lepagův hmat; Pawlikovovy hmat; Riebemontův-; Zangmeisterův hmat; Leopoldovy hmaty; Pawlikovovy hmaty; Hamiltonův znak; Spaldingův znak;
    [Show full text]
  • The “Lever Sign”: a New Clinical Test for the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-3490-7 KNEE The “Lever Sign”: a new clinical test for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture Alessandro Lelli · Rita Paola Di Turi · David B. Spenciner · Marcello Dòmini Received: 6 June 2014 / Accepted: 12 December 2014 © European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2014 Abstract the Lever Sign test was performed on the un-injured leg of Purpose A new clinical test for the diagnosis of ACL rup- all 400 patients as a control. ture is described: the so-called “Lever Sign”. This prospec- Results All tests were nearly 100 % sensitive for patients tive study on four groups of patients divided subjects on with chronic, complete tears of the ACL. However, for the basis of MRI findings (complete or partial ACL lesion) patients with acute, partial tears, the sensitivity was much and the clinical phase of the injury (acute or chronic). The lower for the Lachman test (0.42), Anterior Drawer test hypothesis was that this manual test would be diagnostic (0.29), and Pivot Shift test (0.11), but not the Lever Sign for both partial and complete tears of the ACL regardless of test (1.00). the elapsed time from injury. Conclusion In general, chronic, complete tears were most Methods A total of 400 patients were evaluated and successfully diagnosed but acute, partial tears were least divided into four, equal-sized groups based on time elapsed successfully diagnosed. The Lever Sign test is more sensi- from injury and MRI findings: Group A (acute phase with tive to correctly diagnosing both acute and partial tears of positive MRI for complete ACL rupture), Group B (chronic the ACL compared with other common manual tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopaedic Examination Spinal Cord / Nerves
    9/6/18 OBJECTIVES: • Identify the gross anatomy of the upper extremities, spine, and lower extremities. • Perform a thorough and accurate orthopaedic ORTHOPAEDIC EXAMINATION examination of the upper extremities, spine, and lower extremities. • Review the presentation of common spine and Angela Pearce, MS, APRN, FNP-C, ONP-C extremity diagnoses. Robert Metzger, DNP, APRN, FNP - BC • Determine appropriate diagnostic tests for common upper extremity, spine, and lower extremity problems REMEMBER THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MUSCULOSKELETAL EXAMINATION Comprehensive History Comprehensive Physical Exam THE PRESENTERS • Chief Complaint • Inspection • HPI OLDCART • Palpation HAVE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST • PMH • Range of Motion TO REPORT • PSH • Basic principles use a goniometer to assess joint ROM until you can • PFSH safely eyeball it • ROS • Muscle grading • Physical exam one finger point • Sensation to maximum pain • Unusual findings winging and atrophy SPINAL COLUMN SPINAL CORD / NERVES • Spinal cord • Begins at Foramen Magnum and • Consists of the Cervical, Thoracic, continues w/ terminus at Conus Medullaris near L1 and Lumbar regions. • Cauda Equina • Collection of nerves which run from • Specific curves to the spinal column terminus to end of Filum Terminale • Lordosis: Cervical and Lumbar • Nerve Roots • Kyphosis: Thoracic and Sacral • Canal is broader in cervical/ lumbar regions due to large number of nerve roots • Vertebrae are the same throughout, • Branch off the spinal cord higher except for C1 & C2, therefore same than actual exit through
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Examination of Knee Ligament Injuries..Pdf
    Review Article Physical Examination of Knee Ligament Injuries Abstract Robert D. Bronstein, MD The knee is one of the most commonly injured joints in the body. Joseph C. Schaffer, MD A thorough history and physical examination of the knee facilitates accurate diagnosis of ligament injury. Several examination techniques for the knee ligaments that were developed before advanced imaging remain as accurate or more accurate than these newer imaging modalities. Proper use of these examination techniques requires an understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of knee ligament injuries. Advanced imaging can be used to augment a history and examination when necessary, but should not replace a thorough history and physical examination. he knee joint is one of the most injuries because the current injury may Tcommonly injured joints in the be the sequela of a previous injury. body. Knee ligament injury and sub- Here, we present specific tech- sequent instability can cause consid- niques for the ligamentous exami- erable disability. Diagnosis of knee nation, including identifying injuries ligament injuries requires a thorough of the anterior cruciate ligament understanding of the anatomy and (ACL), the medial collateral liga- the biomechanics of the joint. Many ment (MCL), the lateral collateral specific examination techniques were ligament (LCL), the posterolateral cor- developed before advanced imaging, ner (PLC), and the posterior cruciate and several techniques remain as ligament (PCL), and describe the asso- accurate or more accurate than the ciated anatomy and biomechanics and From the Division of Sports Medicine, new imaging modalities. Advanced the methods that allow for increased Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and imaging (eg, MRI) is appropriate to diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy.
    [Show full text]