DOCSLIB.ORG

KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Contents Knowl. Org. 46(2019)No.1 KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Official Journal of the International Society for Knowledge Organization ISSN 0943 – 7444 International Journal devoted to Concept Theory, Classification, Indexing and Knowledge Representation Contents Peer Review in 2018 ....................................................................... 3 Letter to the Editor Articles Guohua Xiao. The Brain is a Knowledge Graph ................................................ 71 Pauline Rafferty. Disrupting the Metanarrative: Books recently published .......................................................... 72 A Little History of Image Indexing and Retrieval ....................... 4 Index to Volume 45 ..................................................................... 73 Liwei Xu and Jiangnan Qiu. Unsupervised Multi-class Sentiment Classification Approach ......................................................................................... 15 Reviews of Concepts in KO Martin Frické. The Knowledge Pyramid: the DIKW Hierarchy ....................... 33 Niels Ole Finnemann. Web Archive. ................................................................................... 47 Knowl. Org. 46(2019)No.1 KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION KO Official Journal of the International Society for Knowledge Organization ISSN 0943 – 7444 International Journal devoted to Concept Theory, Classification, Indexing and Knowledge Representation KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION José Augusto Chaves GUIMARÃES, Departamento de Ciência da Informacão, Universidade Estadual Paulista–UNESP, Av. Hygino Muzzi This journal is the organ of the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR Filho 737, 17525-900 Marília SP Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION (General Secretariat: Amos DA- VID, Université de Lorraine, 3 place Godefroy de Bouillon, BP 3397, Michael KLEINEBERG, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den 54015 Nancy Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected]. Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin. E-mail: [email protected] Editors Kathryn LA BARRE, School of Information Sciences, University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign, 501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL Richard P. SMIRAGLIA (Editor-in-Chief), Institute for Knowledge Or- 61820-6211 USA. E-mail: [email protected] ganization and Structure, Shorewood WI 53211 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Devika P. MADALLI, Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC) Indian Statistical Institute (ISI), Bangalore 560 059, India. Joshua HENRY, Institute for Knowledge Organization and Structure, E-mail: [email protected] Shorewood WI 53211 USA. Daniel MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, Departamento de Ciência da Informação, Peter TURNER, Institute for Knowledge Organization and Culture, Universidade Estadual Paulista–UNESP, Av. Hygino Muzzi Filho 737, Shorewood WI 53211 USA. 17525-900 Marília SP Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] J. Bradford YOUNG (Bibliographic Consultant), Institute for Knowledge Widad MUSTAFA el HADI, Université Charles de Gaulle Lille 3, URF Organization and Structure, Shorewood WI 53211, USA. IDIST, Domaine du Pont de Bois, Villeneuve d’Ascq 59653, France. E-mail: [email protected] Editor Emerita H. Peter OHLY, Prinzenstr. 179, D-53175 Bonn, Germany. Hope A. OLSON, School of Information Studies, University of Wiscon- E-mail: [email protected] sin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Northwest Quad Building B, 2025 E New- port St., Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA. E-mail: [email protected] M. Cristina PATTUELLI, School of Information, Pratt Institute, 144 W. 14th Street, New York, New York 10011, USA. Series Editors E-mail: [email protected] Birger HJØRLAND (Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization), K. S. RAGHAVAN, Member-Secretary, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment Department of Information Studies, University of Copenhagen. E-Mail: for Library Science, PES Institute of Technology, 100 Feet Ring Road, [email protected] BSK 3rd Stage, Bangalore 560085, India. E-mail: [email protected]. María J. LÓPEZ-HUERTAS (Research Trajectories in Knowledge Heather Moulaison SANDY, The iSchool at the University of Missouri, Organization), Universidad de Granada, Facultad de Biblioteconomía y 303 Townsend Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. Documentación, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Biblioteca del Colegio E-mail: [email protected] Máximo de Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] M. P. SATIJA, Guru Nanak Dev University, School of Library and Infor- Editorial Board mation Science, Amritsar-143 005, India. E-mail: [email protected] Thomas DOUSA, The University of Chicago Libraries, 1100 E 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Aida SLAVIC, UDC Consortium, PO Box 90407, 2509 LK The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Melodie J. FOX, Institute for Knowledge Organization and Structure, Shorewood WI 53211 USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Renato R. SOUZA, Applied Mathematics School, Getulio Vargas Foundation, Praia de Botafogo, 190, 3o andar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22250- Jonathan FURNER, Graduate School of Education & Information Stud- 900, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] ies, University of California, Los Angeles, 300 Young Dr. N, Mailbox 951520, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1520, USA. Rick SZOSTAK, University of Alberta, Department of Economics, 4 E-mail: [email protected] Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H4. E-mail: [email protected] Claudio GNOLI, University of Pavia, Science and Technology Library, Joseph T. TENNIS, The Information School of the University of Wash- via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] ington, Box 352840, Mary Gates Hall Ste 370, Seattle WA 98195-2840 USA. E-mail: [email protected] Ann M. GRAF, School of Library and Information Science, Simmons University, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 USA. Maja ŽUMER, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 2, E-mail: [email protected] Ljubljana 1000 Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] Knowl. Org. 46(2019)No.1 3 Peer Review in 2018 Peer Review in 2018 DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2019-1-3 Knowledge Organization, like all scientific journals, relies on extensive peer review of manuscript submissions to ensure the orig- inality and quality of research published in our pages. On behalf of the KO Editorial Board we would like to express our unqualified gratitude to the scholars listed below who provided peer review during 2018. Geoffrey C. Bowker María J. López-Huertas Vanda Broughton Kun Lu John Budd Devika Madalli Andrew Buxton Daniel Martínez-Ávila D. Grant Campbell Fulvio Mazzocchi Allyson Carlyle Shawne Miksa Inkyung Choi Elizabeth Milonas Hans Dam Christensen Robert D. Montoya Stella Dextre Clarke Heather Moulaison Paul Cleverley Thomas Nesmith Ron Day Hyoungjoo Park Melodie Fox M. Cristina Pattuelli Jonathan Furner Isabella Peters Claudio Gnoli Pauline Rafferty Ann Graf K. S. Raghavan Richard Griscom Laura Ridenour Tina Gross Pat Riva Lala Hajibayova K. R. Roberto Pekka Henttonen Valerie Schafer Lynne Howarth Renato Rocha Souza Michèle Hudon M. P. Satija Isto Huvila Vanessa Schlais Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan Ali Shiri Patrick Keilty Aida Slavic Ulrika Kjellman Louise Spiteri Michael Kleineberg Rick Szostak Kathryn La Barre Douglas Tudhope Gregory H. Leazer Judi Vernau Deborah Lee Jane Winters Hur-li Lee Yejun Wu Gercina Ângela Borém de Oliveira Lima Marcia Lei Zeng 4 Knowl. Org. 46(2019)No.1 P. Rafferty. Disrupting the Metanarrative: A Little History of Image Indexing and Retrieval Disrupting the Metanarrative: A Little History of Image Indexing and Retrieval Pauline Rafferty Aberystwyth University, Department of Information Management, Libraries and Archives, Aberystwyth SY23 3UX, <[email protected]> Pauline Rafferty is Senior Lecturer at Aberystwyth University, teaching knowledge organization and representa- tion, information architectures, and qualitative approaches to research. Her research interests include knowledge organisation and cultural documentation, and critical communication and information studies. Specific areas of interest include popular culture in and through the web, the democratisation of critical authority, and participative digital cultural production. She holds a PhD in critical theory and cultural studies. Pauline is Joint Editor of Journal of Information Science and Joint Regional Editor of The Electronic Library. She has co-edited books for Facet and co-written a book for Ashgate. Rafferty, Pauline. 2019. “Disrupting the Metanarrative: A Little History of Image Indexing and Retrieval.” Knowledge Organization 46(1): 4-14. 83 references. DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2019-1-4. Abstract: The aims of this paper are twofold: to offer a short history of image retrieval, and secondly and relatedly, to critique the metanarrative of modernity emerging in the literature of knowledge organization and information retrieval. The paper reviews the emerging grand narrative in relation to knowledge organization and information retrieval that sees them as specific aspects of modernity and technological efficiency. This grand narrative is particularly interested in technology even when it is contextualising tech- nology. A more nuanced history emerges when the focus moves to the representation, organization, and retrieval of images. This literature foregrounds not only the technology but also issues relating to definitions of the “subject” and issues relating to interpretation and meaning- making. Received: 18 September 2018; Revised: 26 November 2018; Accepted: 10 December 2018 Keywords: information systems, image retrieval, image indexing,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems
    79 Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems David Williams Abstract A literature search indicates that Data, Information and Knowledge continue to be placed into a hierarchical construct where it is considered that information is more valuable than data and that information can be processed into becoming precious knowledge. Wisdom continues to be added to the model to further confuse the issue. This model constrains our ability to think more logically about how and why we develop knowledge management systems to support and enhance knowledge- intensive processes, tasks or projects. This paper seeks to summarise development of the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom hierarchy, explore the extensive criticism of it and present a more logical (and accurate) construct for the elements of intellectual capital when developing and managing Knowledge Management Systems. Keywords: DIKW, knowledge management, intellectual capital, organizational learning, systems, data, information, knowledge, wisdom, truth, records, evidence, belief. Introduction Whenever we build systems or develop architecture or a framework for developing systems, it is critical to have a shared understanding of the style, design elements and building blocks that we are working with. Having a simple model of the relationships between data, information and knowledge is important to be able to promote a shared understanding of how the components of a knowledge management system connect and contribute to achieving the desired business outcome. The construct of the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) as a hierarchy is not a preferred model to underpin the design, build and operation of knowledge management systems and may lead to poor design. The presumption that if you process enough data, a system will deliver information and then knowledge is challenged by many critics of the DIKW hierarchy model.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Knowledge Monopoly of Law Librarianship Under the DIKW Pyramid
    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Law Librarian Scholarship Other Publication Series 2016 Discovering the Knowledge Monopoly of Law Librarianship Under the DIKW Pyramid Xiaomeng Zhang University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/librarian/23 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/librarian Part of the Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Zhang, Alex Xiomeng. "Discovering the Knowledge Monopoly of Law Librarianship Under the DIKW Pyramid” L. Library J., 108, no. 4 (2016): 599-622. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Other Publication Series at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Librarian Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 108:4 [2016-29] Discovering the Knowledge Monopoly of Law Librarianship Under the DIKW Pyramid* Alex “Xiaomeng” Zhang** Historical debates demonstrated that knowledge monopoly is a key to a profession. This article explores the exclusive knowledge base of the law librarianship profession through the lens of the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) paradigm. Introduction .......................................................599 Knowledge Autonomy as the Core Characteristic
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Parallels Between Knowledge Creation and Inventory Management
    AD ALTA JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FINDING PARALLELS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT aLUKÁŠ RICHTER company? Many economist and thinkers note, that knowledge is the most important resource of each company. University of Žilina, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, Department of Management Theories, Univerzitná Nowadays there are many universal models in knowledge 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina management, which should be useful for praxis. But they are email: [email protected] often more theoretical and abstract than ready for application in concrete case. The situation is not even in utilization in This article is supported by Faculty Research Grant of FRI, University of Žilina. inventory management. It can be found many universal models of knowledge creation in contemporary literature. For example: - DIKW model (Data-information-knowledge-wisdom Abstract: According to studies, the total costs related to inventories usually raise to 30- 60% of all company’s operational costs, therefore it is necessary to manage inventory pyramid model), meaningfully. Inventory management deals with complexity and many coordination - Senge’s Learning organization, problems, because inventory is managed by many different people. This fact usually - Nonaka’s SECI model, ‘Ba’ concept and Process model of causes of many problems in company and in supply chain. How is it possible to deal with these complex problems? Company need to improve the learning processes to the knowledge-based firm, foster knowledge creation. Studying knowledge management and utilization of these - Motycka’s Theory of regress ARME spiral, ideas in specific problematic of inventory management can bring competitive - Rona’s and Haslet’s Feedback model of knowledge-creation advantage for company and whole supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Knowledge in Management of Innovation
    resources Article Role of Knowledge in Management of Innovation Yury Nurulin 1,* , Inga Skvortsova 2, Iosif Tukkel 1 and Marko Torkkeli 3 1 Institute of Computer Science and Technology, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University; Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, Sankt-Peterburg 195251, Russia; [email protected] 2 Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University; Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, Sankt-Peterburg 195251, Russia; [email protected] 3 School of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland; marko.torkkeli@lut.fi * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-7812-297-1628 Received: 15 March 2019; Accepted: 23 April 2019; Published: 5 May 2019 Abstract: Knowledge has always been, and still is, a crucial source of economy. However, during the past few years we have seen a growing interest in treating knowledge as a significant organizational resource for innovation. This trend coincides with the rapid development of ICT, indicating the strong influence that ICTs have on the processes of creating, disseminating, and using knowledge. At present, issues of innovation management and knowledge management are studied independently, which creates a certain gap in the systemic understanding of the innovation development processes. The paper proposes an integrated approach to the issues mentioned. The hierarchy and taxonomy of knowledge are considered from the point of view of their influence on decision-making at different stages of the innovation lifecycle. Our proposition complements and contributes to several recent models of decision-making developed in the frame of the innovation process. Keywords: Innovation system; knowledge typology; decision-making; innovation lifecycle 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Repository/Kuhn Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Pdf Kurzweil, R
    Philosophical foundations of the Death and Anti-Death discussion (Forthcoming in Vol. 15, Death And Anti-Death set of anthologies by Ria Press) Jeremy Horne Perhaps there has been no greater opportunity than in this “VOLUME FIFTEEN of our Death And Anti-Death set of anthologies” to write about how might think about life and how to avoid death. There are two reasons to discuss “life”, the first being enhancing our understanding of who we are and why we may be here in the Universe. The second is more practical: how humans meet the physical challenges brought about by the way they have interacted with their environment. Many persons discussing “life” beg the question about what “life” is. Surely, when one discusses how to overcome its opposite, death, they are not referring to another “living” thing such as a plant. There seems to be a commonality, though, and it is this commonality is one needing elaboration. It ostensibly seems to be the boundary condition separating what is completely passive (inert) from what attempts to maintain its integrity, as well as fulfilling other conditions we think “life” has. In our present discussion, there will be a reminder that it by no means has been unequivocally established what life really is by placing quotes around the word, namely, “life”. Consider it a tag representing a bundle of philosophical ideas that will be unpacked in this paper. Each of us in our isolated way since humans have been able to think for themselves has known in advance that their individual existences are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knowledge Pyramid: a Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy
    The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy Item Type Preprint Authors Fricke, Martin Citation The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy 2008, Download date 30/09/2021 19:18:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105670 The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy This paper has been accepted for publication in Journal of Information Science and the final (edited, revised and typeset) version of this paper will be published in Journal of Information Science Vol?/Issue?/Year? By SAGE Publications Ltd.. All rights reserved. © CILIP. For more information please visit: http://jis.sagepub.co.uk Martin Frické School of Information Resources and Library Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, AZ 85718, USA Abstract The paper evaluates the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DIKW) Hierarchy. This hierarchy is part of the canon of information science and management. The paper considers whether the hierarchy, also known as the ‘Knowledge Hierarchy’, is a useful and intellectually desirable construct to introduce, whether the views expressed about DIKW are true and have evidence in favour of them, and whether there are good reasons offered or sound assumptions made about DIKW. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as ‘weak knowledge’, that knowledge also is ‘weak knowledge’ and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying Big Data: Value of Data Analysis Skills for Research Librarians
    Demystifying Big Data: Value of Data Analysis Skills for Research Librarians Tammy Ann Syrek-Marshall, MLS Abstract There was a time when librarians learned statistics solely as a management tool, a way of measuring library usage and materials circulation. More advanced users of statistics might use it in research papers as a metric for in-depth study of patron behavior and bibliographic analysis. At one time, Excel spreadsheets primary use was in managing library budgets or producing attractive graphs for library reports and publications. As for data, it’s no longer enough to simply provide access; the value now is in understanding and interpreting this data. This begins with knowing the difference between small data and big data. Small data is static, a snapshot of a single moment in time. Businesses and other organizations, however, are now eagerly tapping into the predictive power of big data. To fully realize the potential of big data, people who possess certain skill sets are in high demand, making data analytics and data science two of the fastest growing career fields. Depending on the size of the organization, librarians will find themselves called upon to work closely with data analysts. Librarians and researchers who possess even a basic understanding of data analysis are now positioned to competently collaborate with these data professionals. Research librarians with a strong grasp of the methodology and processes of data analysis stand the best chance of expanding their roles within their organizations. To this end, for those who currently have had limited exposure to big data and analytics, it is time to become acquainted with this growing field; to begin the process of expanding research methodology with an understanding of predictive data analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • 123 the Cybercultural Scene in Contemporary
    The Cybercultural Scene in Contemporary Journalism: Semantic Web, Algorithms, Applications and Curation Elizabeth Saad Corrêa 1 Daniela Bertocchi 2 Abstract This paper discusses the different cybercultural aspects within contemporary journalism experiences, mainly from the emergence of the Semantic Web and the technical functionalities that result from it, such as the use of algorithms and applications. We explain the basic concepts of this technical set and it’s correlation to the Communication and Journalism fields particularly. The possibilities of approximation of this scene within journalistic activity are presented due to examples which are already in application with international journalistic markers. We come up with a configuration of the curation role for the professional that will act within this new cybercultural context. Keywords : Cyberculture, Digital Journalism, Semantic Web, Algorithms, Curation Introduction We aim to think communication happens when machines also communicate, especially in the journalistic information context. This concern rises as a result of the recent and increasingly present debates about the development of the Semantic Web (SW), one of Tim Berners-Lee (Bourenane, Szoniecky, &Saleh, 2009) most well-known predictions which now begins to reach it’s stage of consolidation (Adolphs, Cheng, Klüwer,Uszkoreit, & Xu, 2010). From the SW, we are also interested in discussing the debates about the use of Algorithms and Applications (apps) in the journalistic process, exploration which discloses an irreversible trend in the main highlighted essays of the web as (Rabaino, 2011 and Carr, 2011). The SW, apps, algorithms, databases, among other things, are contemporary cybercultural manifestations and change the ways of sociability, therefore, we are faced with another discussion and reflection field, not to say pressing changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Strategie Aziendali: Competere E Cooperare
    Dipartimento di Impresa e Management Cattedra di Economia e Gestione delle Imprese Le strategie aziendali: competere e cooperare Prof.ssa Francesca Romana Arduino Matr. Tiziana Lauritano Anno Accademico 2019/2020 1 INDICE Sommario INTRODUZIONE ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CAPITOLO 1: LA STRATEGIA COMPETITIVA .............................................................................................. 5 1.1 COMPETERE EFFICACEMENTE SUL MERCATO .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 I TRE APPROCCI PRINCIPALI ALLA STRATEGIA COMPETITIVA .................................................................................. 9 1.2.1 La leadership di costo ................................................................................................................. 10 1.2.2 La strategia di differenziazione .................................................................................................. 14 1.2.3 La strategia di focalizzazione ...................................................................................................... 17 1.3 L’INFLUENZA DELL’ICT SULL’ELABORAZIONE DELLA STRATEGIA AZIENDALE ........................................................... 21 1.4 I VANTAGGI DELLO SVILUPPO AUTONOMO .................................................................................................... 26 CAPITOLO 2: LA STRATEGIA DI COLLABORAZIONE ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Significant Role of Metadata for Data Marketplaces
    Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications 2019 The Significant Role of Metadata for Data Marketplaces Sebastian Lawrenz Priyanka Sharma Andreas Rausch Institute for Software and Institute for Software Institute for Software Systems Engineering, and Systems Engineering, and Systems Engineering, Clausthal University of Clausthal University of Clausthal University of Technology Technology Technology sebastian.lawrenz@tu- priyanka.sharma@tu- andreas.rausch@tu- clausthal.de clausthal.de clausthal.de Abstract With the shift to a data-driven society, data trading takes on a completely new significance. In the future, data marketplaces will be equivalent to other electronic commerce platforms such as Amazon or eBay. Just like any other online marketplace a data marketplace is a platform that enables convenient buying and selling of products- in this case “data” Metadata is data about data. Metadata plays a significant role in data trading, as it serves as an orientation for all involved parties in the data marketplace. A seller who wants to sell their data on the marketplace needs metadata to describe the selling offer, and the buyer can use it to search and identify relevant data. This paper outlines the significance of metadata in data trading on a data marketplace and classifies the levels of metadata. Moreover, in data trading metadata has also a significant role in determining the data quality. In this paper we also discuss the role of metadata in terms of data quality. Keywords: metadata; data trading; data marketplaces; data quality 1. Motivation and Introduction In the last decade, data has become more important than ever. An oft-quoted phrase is: “Data are the oil of the 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Knowledge Pyramid Be Used to Focus Business Design on Transformation Through Persona Development?
    Dean 1 Can the Knowledge Pyramid be Used to Focus Business Design on Transformation through Persona Development? Written by William G. Dean, DM, Vice President of Business Administration at NewGround The Knowledge Pyramid, commonly known as the Data-Information-Knowledge- Wisdom hierarchy (Figure 1), proposes a defined progression of data-based information transcending upward, toward the attainment of wisdom. Although wisdom has been studied for centuries, a current application can be posed as the interpolative processes involved in answering “why” questions, using gained knowledge (Hoppe, Seising, Nurnberger, & Wenzel, 2011). Ackhoff (1989) defined wisdom as an elevated knowledge, meaning knowledge is said to answer more difficult questions through moral and ethical codes (Hoppe et al., 2011). Figure 1: Source: Brahmachary, Ayan. “DIKW Model: Explaining the DIKW Pyramid or DIKW Hierarchy, CertGuidance, May 4, 2018, n. p. Web. Dean 2 Reasoning has followed a progressional hierarchy within the Knowledge Pyramid using assumptions that data can be used to create information; information used to create knowledge; and knowledge can be used to create wisdom (Rowley, 2007, p. 164). Many organizations use data and information to develop strategies and business objectives, oftentimes without the focused contribution of knowledge to guide strategic decisions and goal setting using the higher -areas of knowledge and wisdom. Additionally, organizations are not applying the concept of persona development to further guide organizational design and marketing for improved business results. The purpose of this paper is to briefly examine the Knowledge Pyramid and apply its key attributes to persona development that might allow for business transformation in organizations focused on shared behaviors for product or service delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytics in the Pursuit of Knowledge: Adapting the Knowledge Pyramid
    Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences j 2018 Analytics in the Pursuit of Knowledge: Adapting the Knowledge Pyramid Ronald D. Freeze University of Arkansas – Fayetteville [email protected] Abstract will need 4.4 million jobs by 2015 with only one-third being filled [10], U.S. may face a 50 to 60 percent gap Advances in storage leading to the Internet of in deep analytics talent [11], demand for employees in Things (IOT) and Big Data has exponentially the analytics discipline surpasses the supply [12] only increased the Data aspect of the traditional Knowledge 26 percent of companies feel that their analytics needs Pyramid – Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom are met [13] and business schools [need] to develop (DIKW). This paper presents an adaptation of the appropriate business analytics courses and programs Knowledge Pyramid as an Analytics Pyramid in which for all majors [14]. With the rapid expansion and Time is posited to represent Wisdom as the pinnacle availability of data, a push to spend money to create achievement when pursuing knowledge. Analogies of value from the captured data and the recognition that the DIKW are presented from the Analytics Pyramid as greater talent is needed to realize value, the question Description-Aggregation-Modeling-Time. arises on whether the predominant focus on the data is Implementing the premise of the Analytics Pyramid getting in the way of acquiring more knowledge. The focuses on an interative/repetitive movement of both question needs to be asked: How do we create individuals and organizations through all Description- knowledge through analytics, and what, in analytics, Aggregation-Modeling-Time stages in order to build relates to knowledge? and obtain the Wisdom pursued in the traditional The technological advances allowing the storage of Knowledge Pyramid.
    [Show full text]