Notes on Maternal Behavior and Post-Brooding Aggression in the Prairie Skink, Eumeces Septentrionalis Louis A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes on Maternal Behavior and Post-Brooding Aggression in the Prairie Skink, Eumeces Septentrionalis Louis A University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Herpetology Papers in the Biological Sciences 1985 Notes on Maternal Behavior and Post-brooding Aggression in the Prairie Skink, Eumeces septentrionalis Louis A. Somma Florida State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciherpetology Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Somma, Louis A., "Notes on Maternal Behavior and Post-brooding Aggression in the Prairie Skink, Eumeces septentrionalis" (1985). Papers in Herpetology. 13. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciherpetology/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Herpetology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. (1985) NEBRhS'J<.A HfllP:5:'OOLOGICAL NEW SL:5:TTDl 6 (4) I 9 - 12 , (fJ",,,J. .. ) Notes on Maternal Behavior and Post-broodinSJ ASJSJression in the prairie sRinR E!!HIeces se~telttl"'iMla/is Louis A. S(lII'JI!a Th. '~~;:: :'i :O~b .servation s on . In E. Parental beha vior in 1 hards an d were IIIade OJ sna~e~ see~s to be a relat i ve ly and Ne 1 son rare phenomenon (Porter, 1972) . ions reported Snakes such as py thon s (Hutchison were made on three et aI., 1966; Harlow and Gri99, female E. septentrional Is that were R84J. cobras (Oliver, 1956 ; obta l nedon June 11, 1983 from an Campbell and Quinn, 1975; Tryon, urban colony of skinks living In 19 79) , kraits (Wa ll, 1921), the Omaha , Ne braska. They were cap­ bl i nd snake , LeptotyPhlops du lcls . tured wh ile In a gr4v id condition and with in their nest cav ities (Hibbar d. which Ifflre hollowed out beneath, vi per, rock. All three cavities were con ­ (SIIIHh , nected to e<l ch other by a system of Trlmeresurus burrows. 1929). the abacura (Meade, 1937, The sklnk s werE' sep~rated and an d wilson , 19661 and placed in indhidual pl astiC sna~es of the genus terraria that had a soil substrate. {I(opsteln, 19]8; Fuk.da , 191;51 A square plate of 1" thi ck a ll known to brood their eggs. transparent red acr ylic was pro­ vided for each of them <lS a shelter Katernal beh<lv ior ' in lizards was under whi ch they cou ld hol low out a probably first described by P.R. nest chamber . The ac rylic plates Hoy in 188], based on his obser- facilitated easy observation of the vat ions the glass sklnks while provid i ng th@lll wilh a lizard , and sense of security. Nest c';vlt les were not constr ucted ,¥j11~#:f;, "CO ~I h<l s been ' i'::;;~:~ by the capti ve skinks until June alligator 25 . On this same day , two of t he l locephalus (G reene s kinks beg an ovtposltlng thei r and ..,st oviparous e!l9s. On the fol lowing day, a ll membe rs of the 5cl ncld th~ee had comp 1eted oy Ipos 1t i ng (Ditmars , 1904; Noble t heir eggs. The cl utch s izes num ­ • PH] ; Taylor . H135; bered 11. 15 and 18. j~;;::. 1943; Fi t ch. 19 54, 1970 ; ~~ 1959 ; Mount , 196]; Collins , During the Incub ation period, the 1975; Hl klda, 1981 ; Hasegawa . s ki nkS m<ltntained olfactory contact 1985), • with their eggs by tongue-flicking Neonatal care has not been pre­ them. Eggs were occasionally viously documented for E. ro 11 ed about the nes t chambers by septentrionalis, ~lthough it 15 the females with the use of their known to occur 1n E. fasciatus snouts. This egg\ manipulating (Fitch, 1954), E. obso1etus (Evans, activity seemed to 'increase when 1959), ~ fascTatus (Fitch, 1954), the skinks were disturbed by the Eo obsoletus (Evans, 1959), E. observer. Much of the females' iatiscutatus (Hikida, 1981) and r. time was spent quietly coiled laticeps (Hammond, 1985). around or 1yi ng on top of the i r eggs. One individual refused food On July 22, the skinklets were for the duration of the incubation separa ted from the fern a 1es. All period. Whenever a finger was three fema 1es were placed together prodded into the nest chambers, two in the same terrarium. These fema- of the females aggressively bit it, 1es showed a remarkable degree of presumably to defend their aggress i on towards each other for clutches. Defensive behavior while one week prior to being released. brooding has not been previously They constantly bit each other at documeted for this species the bases of their tail regions (Breckenridge, 1943; Nelson, 1963). wh i ch soon became covered wi th An adult ringneck snake, Diadophis scars. None of the skinks had pre­ viously shown aggression towards punctatus, was introduced into one others while they were gravid. of the terraria and was immediately attacked when the fern a 1e came Such post-brooding agression has rushing out of the nest and bit it. been documented for E. egregius The snake was so severely lacerated (Mount, 1963) and ~ laticeps about the head and neck region that (Hammond, 1985). it died two days later. The obserations reported in this On July 16, two clutches of eggs article generate many questions. began hatching. The third clutch It is hoped that this note will ha tched on Ju 1y 18. Th'e presence stimulate more interest in the of 19 hatch 1i ngs from a clutch of study of maternal behavior in the 18 eggs suggests that one of the scincid genus Eumeces. eggs was twinned. All three skinks were observed to 1i ck fl u i d from some of their young while they were Literature Cited h~tching. Similar grooming beha­ Vlor has been reported in the great plains skink, E. obsoletus (Evans Breckenridge, W.J. 1943. The life 1959). One of the females gathered history of the black-banded skink all' 19 of her young into a heap in Eumeces. septentrional is (Baird). the corner of the nest and coi 1ed Amer. M1dl. Nat., 29:591-606. around them. Juveniles that attempted to leave were nudged back Campbell, J. A. and H. R. Quinn. 1975 into the heap. The female that had Reproduction. in a pair of Asiatic previously killed the ringneck cobras, Naja naja (Serpentes snake remained defensive. When a Elapidae). J. Herp~(2): 229-233. ' ~i nger was placed near the young, lt was promptly bitten. Collins, J. T. 1975. Observations on re~roduct i on in the southern coa 1 The females remained in the nests sk1nk (Eumeces anthracinus pluvialis with their, young for three days. Cope). Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 77(2): 126-127. - t 10 Ditmars, R. L. 1904. Observations on Hikida, T. 1981 Reproduction in the lacertilians Ann. Rept. New York Zool. Japanese skink (Eumeceslatiscutatus) Soc., (8): 146-160 --- in Kyotot. Zool. Mag., 90: 85-95. Evans, L.T. 1959. A motion picture study Hoy, P.R. 1883. Catalogue of the cold­ of maternal behavior of the lizard, blooded vertebrates of Wisconsin. Eumeces obsoletus Baird and Girard. Geol. Wisconsin Surv. 1873-1878. 1: COpela, 1959(2): 103-110 422-435. Fitch, H. S. 1970. Reproductive cycles Hutchison, V. H., H. G. Dow 1 i ng and A. in 1 izards and snakes. Univ. Ka-ilsas Vinegar. 1966. Thermoregulation in a Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., (52): brooding female Indian pythan. Python 1-247. -- -- molurus bivittatus. Science, 151(3711) : 694-695. Fukada, H. 1965. Breeding habits of some Japanese reptiles (critical Kopstein, F. 1938. Ein Beitrag Zur review). Bull. Kyoto Gakugei Univ., Eirkunde and Zur Fortpflanzung der Sere ~ (27): 65-82. Malaiischen Reptilien. Bull. Raffl. Mus. (Singapore), (14): 81-167. Greene, H. W. and B. E. Dial. 1966. Brooding behavior by female Texas Meade, G. P. 1937. Breeding habits of alligator lizards. Herpetologica, Farancia abacura in captivity. 22 (4): 303. Copeia, 1937(1): 12-1~. Hahn, D. E. and L. D. Wilson. 1966. Meade, G.P. 1940. Maternal care of eggs Variation in two broods of Farancia by Farancia. Herpetologica, 12(2): abacura reinwardti Schlegel 111-114 (Serpentes: Colubridae) from Louisiana. J. Ohio Herpetol Soc.- Mount, R. H. 1963. The natural history 5(4): 159-160 of the red-tailed skink, Eumeces egreg;us Baird. Amer. Midl. Nat., Hammond, S. 1985. Repr~ductive behavioi -_o_-_o-}O(2): 356-385. - in the broadhead skink, Eumeces laticeps. Notes from Noah, 12 (4) : Nelson, W. F. 1963. Natural history of 7-8. the northern prairie skink, Eumeces septentrional is septentrional is Harlow, P. and G. Grigg. 1984. (Baird). Unpubl. Ph.D~ Diss., Univ. Shivering thermogenesis in a brooding Minnesota, Minneapolis~-; 135 pp. diamond python, Python spilotes Noble, G. K. and E. R.Mason. 1933. spilotes. Copeia, 1984(4): 959-965. Experiments on the brooding habits of Hasegawa, M. 1985. Effect of brooding the lizards E,umeces and O~hisaurus. on egg mortality in the lizard Eumeces Amer. Mus. Novlt., (619): 1- 9. okadae on Miyake-Jima, Izu Islands, Japan. Copeia, 1985(2): 497-500. Oliver, J.A. 1956. Reproduction in the king cobra, Oph;ophagus hannah Cantor. Hibbard, C.W. 1964. A brooding colony Zoologica, 41(17): 145-152. of the blind snake, Leptotyphlops dulcis dissecta Cope. Copeia, Pope, C.H. 1929. Notes on reptiles from T964IT): 222. Fukien and other Chinese provinces. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 58: 335-487. -- I I Porter, K.R. 1972. Herpetology. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. 524 pp. Smith, M.A.
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 2000 A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota Royce E. Ballinger University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Justin W. Meeker University of Nebraska-Lincoln Marcus Thies University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Ballinger, Royce E.; Meeker, Justin W.; and Thies, Marcus, "A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota" (2000). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 49. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/49 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2000. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 26: 29-46 A CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION MAPS OF THE AMPmBIANS AND REPTILES OF SOUTH DAKOTA Royce E. Ballinger, Justin W. Meeker, and Marcus Thies School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0118 rballinger1 @ unl.edu lent treatise on the distribution and ecology of the ABSTRACT turtles of the state in an unpublished dissertation. Fourteen species of amphibians and 30 species of reptiles Several other authors (Dunlap 1963, 1967, O'Roke 1926, are documented from South Dakota, based on the examina­ Peterson 1974, Smith 1963a, 1963b, 1966, Underhill tion of 7,361 museum specimen records.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Ecology Provincial Resources
    MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WILDLIFE ECOLOGY PROVINCIAL RESOURCES !1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank: Olwyn Friesen (PhD Ecology) for compiling, writing, and editing this document. Subject Experts and Editors: Barbara Fuller (Project Editor, Chair of Test Writing and Education Committee) Lindsey Andronak (Soils, Research Technician, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) Jennifer Corvino (Wildlife Ecology, Senior Park Interpreter, Spruce Woods Provincial Park) Cary Hamel (Plant Ecology, Director of Conservation, Nature Conservancy Canada) Lee Hrenchuk (Aquatic Ecology, Biologist, IISD Experimental Lakes Area) Justin Reid (Integrated Watershed Management, Manager, La Salle Redboine Conservation District) Jacqueline Monteith (Climate Change in the North, Science Consultant, Frontier School Division) SPONSORS !2 Introduction to wildlife ...................................................................................7 Ecology ....................................................................................................................7 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................8 Carrying capacity.................................................................................................................... 9 Population dynamics ..............................................................................................................10 Basic groups of wildlife ................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Movements of the Common Five-Lined Skink (Plestiodon Fasciatus) in the Northern Portion of Its Range
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(3):743–752. Submitted: 3 July 2018; Accepted: 25 November 2018; Published: 16 December 2018. SUMMER MOVEMENTS OF THE COMMON FIVE-LINED SKINK (PLESTIODON FASCIATUS) IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF ITS RANGE DANIEL J. BRAZEAU1 AND STEPHEN J. HECNAR1,2 1Department of Biology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—Common Five-lined Skinks (Plestiodon [formerly Eumeces] fasciatus) are difficult to study due to their small size, secretive habits, and semi-fossorial natural history. Habitat selection and dispersal have been studied at several locations across the range of the species, but few details of movements are known. Our objectives were to use radio-telemetry to gain more insight into skink movements and to test the efficacy of small, lightweight transmitters that we externally attached. We fitted 31 skinks with transmitters that provided up to 16 consecutive days of dispersal information. Movements varied greatly among individuals with some staying close to initial capture sites while most moved tens to hundreds of meters over a short period of observation. We located most of the tracked individuals under cover of woody debris but found they were much more mobile than previous mark- recapture studies suggested. Our tracking supported the idea that traditional home ranges were not occupied, but instead most individuals made regular linear movements while returning to the same locations occasionally. Individuals spent on average just over 30% of their time underground, in grass tussocks, and inside standing trees near the end of the active season.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Skink Plestiodon Septentrionalis
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Prairie Skink Plestiodon septentrionalis in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2017 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2017. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Prairie Skink Plestiodon septentrionalis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 48 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the prairie skink Eumeces septentrionalis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 22 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Bredin, E.J. 1989. COSEWIC status report on northern prairie skink Eumeces septentrionalis septentrionalis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 41 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Connie Browne for writing a draft of the status report on Prairie Skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada and Climate Change. This report was overseen by Kristiina Ovaska, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Amphibians and Reptiles Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Scinque des prairies (Plestiodon septentrionalis) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Species 8-2-11
    Bird Species of Greatest Convention Conservation Need Number Group Ref Number Common Name Scientific Name (yes/no) Amphibians 1459 Eastern Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Y Amphibians 1460 Smallmouth Salamander Ambystoma texanum N Amphibians 1461 Eastern Newt (T) Notophthalmus viridescens Y Amphibians 1462 Longtail Salamander (T) Eurycea longicauda Y Amphibians 1463 Cave Salamander (E) Eurycea lucifuga Y Amphibians 1465 Grotto Salamander (E) Eurycea spelaea Y Amphibians 1466 Common Mudpuppy Necturus maculosus Y Amphibians 1467 Plains Spadefoot Spea bombifrons N Amphibians 1468 American Toad Anaxyrus americanus N Amphibians 1469 Great Plains Toad Anaxyrus cognatus N Amphibians 1470 Green Toad (T) Anaxyrus debilis Y Amphibians 1471 Red-spotted Toad Anaxyrus punctatus Y Amphibians 1472 Woodhouse's Toad Anaxyrus woodhousii N Amphibians 1473 Blanchard's Cricket Frog Acris blanchardi Y Amphibians 1474 Gray Treefrog complex Hyla chrysoscelis/versicolor N Amphibians 1476 Spotted Chorus Frog Pseudacris clarkii N Amphibians 1477 Spring Peeper (T) Pseudacris crucifer Y Amphibians 1478 Boreal Chorus Frog Pseudacris maculata N Amphibians 1479 Strecker's Chorus Frog (T) Pseudacris streckeri Y Amphibians 1480 Boreal Chorus Frog Pseudacris maculata N Amphibians 1481 Crawfish Frog Lithobates areolata Y Amphibians 1482 Plains Leopard Frog Lithobates blairi N Amphibians 1483 Bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianaN Amphibians 1484 Bronze Frog (T) Lithobates clamitans Y Amphibians 1485 Pickerel Frog Lithobates palustris Y Amphibians 1486 Southern Leopard Frog
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Northern Prairie Skink on Private Land
    Skink Watch: Monitoring the Northern Prairie Skink on Private Land Here are step by step instructions on how to monitor prairie skinks: 1. Locate appropriate habitat on your property. Generally prairie skinks tend to be in the following habitat: ◦ open grassland, or grassland along edges of aspen forest ◦ south or west facing slopes ◦ sand blowouts surrounded by vegetation such as creeping juniper ◦ open areas with sandy soil ◦ gardens, debris or wood piles 2. Lay cover boards in habitat where prairie skinks are likely to be found. Skinks like to hide under pieces of wood or metal. Scraps of wood approximately 1 by 2 feet work well. Putting extra cover in skink habitat makes them easier to find and monitor. It is best to lay several pieces of cover in one area and to put out the cover in spring or early summer. If cover already exists (ie wood piles or debris piles) go to step 4. 3. Leave cover undisturbed for at least two weeks. 4. Check under cover boards by quickly lifting it, using a motion similar to opening a book. 5. Take note of skinks under the board, and also keep an eye for skinks running out from under it. 6. Collect information about any skinks seen (see Recording Sheet). 7. Replace cover as you found it. 8. Submit information about the sightings, using the data sheet on the following page, to the SOS website (http://www.naturenorth.com/Skink/SOS_reporting.html) or the following address: Prairie Skink Recovery Team c/o Dr Pamela Rutherford Department of Biology Brandon University Brandon, MB R7A 6A9 We appreciate any and all information you gather on the northern prairie skinks.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba Envirothon – Wildlife Ecology – Regional Resource
    MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WILDLIFE ECOLOGY REGIONAL RESOURCES !1 Introduction to wildlife ...................................................................................4 Ecology ....................................................................................................................4 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................5 Carrying capacity.................................................................................................................... 6 Population dynamics ................................................................................................................7 Basic groups of wildlife ..................................................................................8 Wildlife anatomy and identification .............................................................10 Basic anatomy ........................................................................................................10 Skulls and teeth .......................................................................................................12 Dental formula ......................................................................................................................13 Skull identification and measurements .......................................................................15 Mammal Skulls ......................................................................................................................15 Bird Skulls .............................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction of the Prairie Skink, Eumeces Septentrionalis, in Nebraska
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 47 Number 3 Article 3 7-31-1987 Reproduction of the prairie skink, Eumeces septentrionalis, in Nebraska Louis A. Somma University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Somma, Louis A. (1987) "Reproduction of the prairie skink, Eumeces septentrionalis, in Nebraska," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 47 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol47/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. REPRODUCTION OF THE PRAIRIE SKINK, EUMECES SEPTENTRIONALIS, IN NEBRASKA Louis A. Soinma Abstract —Clutch sizes of the prairie skink, Eumeces septciitrioiialis, in Nebraska are positively correlated with female snout-vent lengths (SV'Ls). Data presented in this study and others indicate Nebraska populations of E. septentrioiialis have larger average clutch sizes than other populations within this species' range. The prairie skink, Eumeces septentrionalis, Table 1. Female SVL, clutch size, and mean egg di- mension for Eumeces septentrionalis. is a semi-fossorial, oviparous lizard inhabiting the central lowland province region and tall- SVL grass prairies of North America (Breckenridge 1943, Nelson 1963). In Nebraska, E. septcn- trionolis is found primarily in tall-grass prairies (Lynch 1985) and urban habitat (Somma 1985a). Few reproductive data exist for Nebraska populations (Gehlbach and Col- lette 1959, Iverson 1976, Somma 1985b). This study summarizes data on clutch size and SVL of 21 captive female E.
    [Show full text]
  • Habits and Adaptations of the Great Plains Skink (Eumeces Obsoletus)
    HABITS AND ADAPTATIONS OF THE G-REAT PLAINS SKINK (EUMECES OBSOLETUS) HENRY S. FITCH Department of Zoology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PAGE INTRODUCTION .................... 59 BREEDING .......... ..... ...................... 69 METHODS AND MATERIALS .................... 60 GROWTll ............ ......... 71 FOOD HABITS ....... ... 74 DESCRIPTI& N ................................... 61 PREDATION . ......... 78 RELATIONSHIPS .......... 61 PARASITISM ..... ... .. 79 HABITAT .......... 62 NUMBERS .......... 80 BEHAVIOR ..................................... 65 SUMMARY .......... 81 MOVEMENTS .................................... 67 LITERATURE CITED ............................... 8-' INTRODUCTION were heavily grazed, advance of the woodland either The present field study was made chiefly on the was held in cheek completely or it was much slowed, University of Kaiiisas Natural History Reservation with selection of types most resistant to browsing in Douglas County, northeastern Kansas, six miles or most tolerant of it. north northeast of the University of Kansas campus. The Great Plains skink (Eumeces obsoleius) is The Reservatiorn was described and its history briefly one of the larger kinds of lizards in the United set forth by Fitch (1952). The Reservation lies States. Although it has ain extensive geographic within a browal ecotonal zone where many kinds of range in the southwestern states and northern Mexico, animals typieal of the eastern deciduous forests reach no thorough study of its habits and ecology has their westerni limits and other kinds typical of the heretofore been made. More or less casual observa- interior -ras lands reach thcir eastern limits. tions made at different times and places, by several Since 194S the Reservation has been protected and workers have been recorded in the literature. maintained as a natural area. Earlier, the more open The species was originally described (as Plestiodon parts of it were grazed.
    [Show full text]
  • Microhabitat Preferences of the Prairie Skink (Plestiodon Septentrionalis) in Southwestern Manitoba
    Microhabitat preferences of the prairie skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis) in southwestern Manitoba by Jill Larkin A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Natural Resource Institute University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2011 by Jill Larkin ABSTRACT In Canada, the prairie skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis, formerly Eumeces septentrionalis) exists only in southwestern Manitoba and is listed as Endangered under the Canadian Species at Risk Act. Habitat loss is the most significant threat faced by the prairie skink in Canada. Factors contributing to habitat loss include: native prairie cultivation, aspen (Populus tremuloides) encroachment, leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) invasion, urbanization and road construction. The objectives of this study were to determine microhabitat preferences of prairie skinks, and determine the effect of leafy spurge invasion on prairie skink microhabitat and populations in southwestern Manitoba. To determine microhabitat preferences, sites used by skinks were compared to randomly located sites within the individual’s home range. Artificial cover was the most important microhabitat element for prairie skinks in southwestern Manitoba during the active season. Prairie skinks did not select microhabitat based on other variables, including thermal characteristics, number of leafy spurge stems or percent cover of vegetation, exposed soil, gravel, juniper or leaf litter. The thermal characteristics of the microhabitat were further examined by comparing the temperature under cover to the surface temperature adjacent to the location where each skink was observed. When individuals were caught under cover, the temperature under the cover was significantly lower than the surface temperature.
    [Show full text]