DOCSLIB.ORG

Sarracenias Species & Cultivars Aquascapes Seed Grown Hybrids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sarracenias Species & Cultivars Aquascapes Seed Grown Hybrids AQUASCAPES UNLIMITED, INC PO Box 364, Pipersville PA 18947 Phone: 215-766-8151 Fax: 215-766-8986 www.aquascapesunlimited.com Email: [email protected] Our Sarracenias are sold in small, medium, large, & extra-large sizes. The availability is indicated in the chart below with a price if available. The pricing reflects age and size: Small (1-2 years / min 6 qty ), Medium (2-3 years / min 5 qty), Large (3-4 years / min 4 qty), Extra Large (5+ years / min 1 qty). Sarracenias Species & Cultivars Botanical Name Common Name Small Med. Large XL Sarracenia alata Pale Pitcher 1.95 8.95 16.95 Sarracenia flava Yellow Trumpet 1.95 3.95 8.95 Sarracenia leucophylla White Trumpet 1.95 3.95 8.95 Sarracenia minor Hooded Pitcher 1.95 3.95 8.95 16.95 Sarracenia psittacina Parrot Pitcher - 4.95 9.95 18.95 Sarracenia purpurea Purple Pitcher 1.95 3.95 8.95 16.95 Sarracenia rubra ssp. gulfensis Sweet Pitcher 1.95 3.95 8.95 Sarracenia x ‘Dana’s Delight’ ‘Dana’s Delight’ 8.95 16.95 Sarracenia x ‘Judith Hindle’ ‘Judith Hindle’ 3.95 8.95 16.95 Sarracenia leucophylla 'Tarnock' ‘Tarnock’ 1.95 3.95 8.95 16.95 S. purpurea ‘Jersey Girl’ ‘Jersey Girl’ 1.95 3.95 8.95 16.95 Aquascapes Seed Grown Hybrids Sarracenia Hybrid Botanical Name Small Med. Large XL S. x ahlesii S. rubra × alata 9.95 16.95 S. x areolata S. leucophylla x alata 1.95 S. x catesbaei S. purpurea x flava 9.95 16.95 S. x courtii S. purpurea x psittacina 9.95 16.95 S. x excellens S. leucophylla x minor 2.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 S. x formosa S. psittacina x minor 9.95 16.95 S. x mitchelliana (all green) S. leucophylla x purpurea 16.95 S. x moorei S. flava x leucophylla 9.95 16.95 S. x readii (all green) S. leucophylla x rubra jonsii (all green) 9.95 16.95 S. x swaniana S. purpurea x minor 5.95 12.95 19.95 S. x wrigleyana S. leucophylla x psittacina 16.95 Dutch Treats Botanical Name Common Name Small Med. Large XL S. x farnhamii Sarracenia x farnhamii 4.95 6.95 9.95 16.95 S. x leucophylla hybrid Sarracenia x leucophylla hybrid 16.95 S. x maroon Sarracenia purpurea x rubra complex 9.95 16.95 S. x stevensii Sarracenia x stevensii 4.95 6.95 9.95 16.95 UNC Hybrids Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Dixie Lace’ 1.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Doodle Bug’ 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘June Bug’ 1.95 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Lady Bug’ 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Love Bug’ 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Mardi Gras’ 2.95 4.95 9.95 16.95 Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Red Bug’ 9.95 16.95 AQUASCAPES UNLIMITED, INC PO Box 364, Pipersville PA 18947 Phone: 215-766-8151 Fax: 215-766-8986 www.aquascapesunlimited.com Email: [email protected] Other Carnivores Botanical Name Common Name Size Price Dionea muscipula Venus Fly Trap PL/98 1.95 Drosera binata Fork Leaf Sundew 3” 6.95 Drosera capensis Cape Sundew PL/98 1.25 Drosera filiformis Thread Leaf Sundew PL/98 1.25 Drosera filiformis var. Tracyi Giant Thread Leaf Sundew 3” 12.00 Drosera filiformis var. Tracyi Giant Thread Leaf Sundew PL/98 2.95 Drosera intermedia Spatulate Leaf Sundew PL/98 1.25 Drosera rotundifolia Round Leaf Sundew PL/98 1.25 Carnivorous Companions Botanical Name Common Name Size Price Calopogon tuberousa alba Grass Pink Orchid (white) 3” 15.00 Calopogon tuberousa Grass Pink Orchid 3” 12.50 Gentiana autumnalis Pine Barrens Gentian 3” 12.50 Lachnocaulon minus Small’s Bog Button PL/98 1.25 Lophiola americana Golden-Crest 3” 12.50 Lysmachia terrestris Swamp Candles PL/32 3.50 Narthecium americanum Bog asphodel 3” 12.50 Sabatia kennedyana Marsh Pink PL/72 1.50 Spiranthes odorata Ladies Tress Orchid PL/72 1.25 Vaccinium Macrocarpon American Cranberry PL/98 1.25 ‘BUG OUT’ ® “Carnivores in Captivity” ™ Captivating Carnivorous Plants in a unique mini-greenhouse package with custom informative colorful tags designed to promote, educate and preserve carnivorous plants and their environment. Try some! Your customers will soon be ‘bugging’ you for more. Check out our website for more details . Item Description Notes Price Big Bug Out 4 Plant combo w/ Fly trap Free Mini Greenhouse 9.95 Little Bug Out 1 Med Sarracenia (3yr old) Free Mini Greenhouse 6.50 Little Bug Out 1 Venus Fly Trap Free Mini Greenhouse 6.50 Little Bug Out 1 Sundew Free Mini Greenhouse 6.50 Bugouts come with free marketing materials – poster, full color bench tape, care sheet, and listing on our website “where to buy” store locator .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sarracenias Aquascapes Seed Grown Hybrids Dutch Treats Collector's
    AQUASCAPES UNLIMITED, INC PO Box 364, Pipersville PA 18947 Phone: 215-766-8151, Fax: 215-766-8986 www.aquascapesunlimited.com EMAIL: [email protected] Spring 2014 Our Sarracenias are sold in small, medium and large sizes. The availability is indicated in the chart below with an X=Avail . The pricing reflects age and size: Small - $1.95 (1-2 Years) Multiples of 6, Medium - $3.95 (2-3 Years) Multiples of 5, Large - $8.95 (3-4Years) Multiples of 4. Sarracenias Botanical Name Common Name Small Med. Large Sarracenia alata Pale Pitcher X X X Sarracenia flava Yellow Trumpet X X Sarracenia leucophylla White Trumpet X X Sarracenia leucophylla 'Tarnock' ‘Tarnock’ X X Sarracenia psittacina Parrot Pitcher X Sarracenia purpurea Purple Pitcher X X X Sarracenia rubra Sweet Pitcher X X S. rubra ssp. jonesii (all green) Sweet Pitcher (all green) X Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Dixie Lace’ X X Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Doodle Bug’ X Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Mardi Gras’ X X Sarracenia x UNC Hybrid ‘Red Bug’ X Aquascapes Seed Grown Hybrids Sarracenia Hybrid Botanical Name Small Med. Large S. x areolata S. leucophylla x alata X X X S. x catesbaei S. purp x flava X X X S. readii x moorei S. (leuco x rubra j) (lxf) X X S. x readii All Green S. leuco x rubra jonsii X S. x moorei S. flava x leucophylla X S. x formosa (Limited) S. psitt x minor X Dutch Treats Botanical Name Common Name Size Price S. x 'Farnhamii ' Sarracenia x 'Farnhamii ' PL/72 3.95 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Modes of Carnivorous Plants Aaron M
    Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22244662-20191066 Foraging modes of carnivorous plants Aaron M. Ellison* Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, Massachusetts, 01366, USA Abstract Carnivorous plants are pure sit-and-wait predators: they remain rooted to a single location and depend on the abundance and movement of their prey to obtain nutrients required for growth and reproduction. Yet carnivorous plants exhibit phenotypically plastic responses to prey availability that parallel those of non-carnivorous plants to changes in light levels or soil-nutrient concentrations. The latter have been considered to be foraging behaviors, but the former have not. Here, I review aspects of foraging theory that can be profitably applied to carnivorous plants considered as sit-and-wait predators. A discussion of different strategies by which carnivorous plants attract, capture, kill, and digest prey, and subsequently acquire nutrients from them suggests that optimal foraging theory can be applied to carnivorous plants as easily as it has been applied to animals. Carnivorous plants can vary their production, placement, and types of traps; switch between capturing nutrients from leaf-derived traps and roots; temporarily activate traps in response to external cues; or cease trap production altogether. Future research on foraging strategies by carnivorous plants will yield new insights into the physiology and ecology of what Darwin called “the most wonderful plants in the world”. At the same time, inclusion of carnivorous plants into models of animal foraging behavior could lead to the development of a more general and taxonomically inclusive foraging theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Insectivorous Plants in Northeast India
    Technical Refereed Contribution Status of insectivorous plants in northeast India Praveen Kumar Verma • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box # 136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India • [email protected] Jan Schlauer • Zwischenstr. 11 • 60594 Frankfurt/Main • Germany • [email protected] Krishna Kumar Rawat • CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute • Rana Pratap Marg • Lucknow -226 001 (U.P) • India Krishna Giri • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box #136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India Keywords: Biogeography, India, diversity, Red List data. Introduction There are approximately 700 identified species of carnivorous plants placed in 15 genera of nine families of dicotyledonous plants (Albert et al. 1992; Ellison & Gotellli 2001; Fleischmann 2012; Rice 2006) (Table 1). In India, a total of five genera of carnivorous plants are reported with 44 species; viz. Utricularia (38 species), Drosera (3), Nepenthes (1), Pinguicula (1), and Aldrovanda (1) (Santapau & Henry 1976; Anonymous 1988; Singh & Sanjappa 2011; Zaman et al. 2011; Kamble et al. 2012). Inter- estingly, northeastern India is the home of all five insectivorous genera, namely Nepenthes (com- monly known as tropical pitcher plant), Drosera (sundew), Utricularia (bladderwort), Aldrovanda (waterwheel plant), and Pinguicula (butterwort) with a total of 21 species. The area also hosts the “ancestral false carnivorous” plant Plumbago zelayanica, often known as murderous plant. Climate Lowland to mid-altitude areas are characterized by subtropical climate (Table 2) with maximum temperatures and maximum precipitation (monsoon) in summer, i.e., May to September (in some places the highest temperatures are reached already in April), and average temperatures usually not dropping below 0°C in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Anatomy and Evolutionary Patterns of Anatomical Diversification in Adenia (Passifloraceae) David J
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 27 | Issue 1 Article 3 2009 Descriptive Anatomy and Evolutionary Patterns of Anatomical Diversification in Adenia (Passifloraceae) David J. Hearn University of Arizona, Tucson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hearn, David J. (2009) "Descriptive Anatomy and Evolutionary Patterns of Anatomical Diversification in Adenia (Passifloraceae)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 27: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol27/iss1/3 Aliso, 27, pp. 13–38 ’ 2009, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden DESCRIPTIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS OF ANATOMICAL DIVERSIFICATION IN ADENIA (PASSIFLORACEAE) DAVID J. HEARN Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT To understand evolutionary patterns and processes that account for anatomical diversity in relation to ecology and life form diversity, anatomy of storage roots and stems of the genus Adenia (Passifloraceae) were analyzed using an explicit phylogenetic context. Over 65,000 measurements are reported for 47 quantitative and qualitative traits from 58 species in the genus. Vestiges of lianous ancestry were apparent throughout the group, as treelets and lianous taxa alike share relatively short, often wide, vessel elements with simple, transverse perforation plates, and alternate lateral wall pitting; fibriform vessel elements, tracheids associated with vessels, and libriform fibers as additional tracheary elements; and well-developed axial parenchyma. Multiple cambial variants were observed, including anomalous parenchyma proliferation, anomalous vascular strands, successive cambia, and a novel type of intraxylary phloem.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Posters on Threatened Plant Communities of North Carolina
    Submitted by Nicolette L. Cagle on June 26, 2012 Native Plant Studies Certificate Project: Educational Posters on Threatened Plant Communities of North Carolina Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest from the Coastal Plain, NC. [Photo by David Blevins, Ph.D.] Submitted by Nicolette L. Cagle on June 26, 2012 Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description........................................................................................................................................ 3 Timeline......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Most Threatened Plant Communities in North Carolina .............................................................................. 4 Poster Display at the North Carolina Botanical Garden................................................................................ 5 Posters .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Threatened Plant Communities ................................................................................................................ 7 Poster Project References
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Responses to Resource Availability
    Carnivorous plant responses to resource availability: environmental interactions, morphology and biochemistry Christopher R. Hatcher A doctoral thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University November 2019 © by Christopher R. Hatcher (2019) Abstract Understanding how organisms respond to resources available in the environment is a fundamental goal of ecology. Resource availability controls ecological processes at all levels of organisation, from molecular characteristics of individuals to community and biosphere. Climate change and other anthropogenically driven factors are altering environmental resource availability, and likely affects ecology at all levels of organisation. It is critical, therefore, to understand the ecological impact of environmental variation at a range of spatial and temporal scales. Consequently, I bring physiological, ecological, biochemical and evolutionary research together to determine how plants respond to resource availability. In this thesis I have measured the effects of resource availability on phenotypic plasticity, intraspecific trait variation and metabolic responses of carnivorous sundew plants. Carnivorous plants are interesting model systems for a range of evolutionary and ecological questions because of their specific adaptations to attaining nutrients. They can, therefore, provide interesting perspectives on existing questions, in this case trait-environment interactions, plant strategies and plant responses to predicted future environmental scenarios. In a manipulative experiment, I measured the phenotypic plasticity of naturally shaded Drosera rotundifolia in response to disturbance mediated changes in light availability over successive growing seasons. Following selective disturbance, D. rotundifolia became more carnivorous by increasing the number of trichomes and trichome density. These plants derived more N from prey and flowered earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter Vol 48 No 3 September 2019
    Growing Drosera murfetii Mark S. Anderson • Vancouver • Washington • USA • [email protected] In the few years since Drosera murfetii has become separated from Drosera arcturi as a new species it has become available to growers, though it is certainly not available everywhere. I feel it is sufficiently unusual and interesting to deserve a place in many carnivorous plant collections. I began growing this species several years ago when a generous group of friends gave me a plant, along with an implied “Good luck!” since little was known about its culture. Here are some of my experiences and thoughts about keeping this fascinating species alive and, maybe, thriving. Drosera murfetii is an odd-ball among sundews (Back Cover). With its strange simple-looking leaves with tentacled ends D. murfetii looks like nothing else, other than D. arcturi. It has been called D. arcturi “giant form” before it was given species status. The leaves are spear-shaped with a pro- nounced mid-rib and are sometimes completely without tentacles (Fig. 1). They have a ‘v’-shaped cross section, the two longitudinal sides separating as the leaf develops. Not very sundew- like. What is very much as you would expect is the tentacles. These grow along the upper surface of the leaf from 1/3 to 2/3 of the length farthest from the main plant and extending to the tip. Another strange thing about this species is the tentacles along the edges generally bend around the leaf to the back side of it. An adaptation al- Figure 1: Drosera murfetii. lowing the plant to catch insects crawl- ing up or landing on this side of the leaf? Drosera murfetii plants generally will have fewer leaves than are common with other Drosera and plants with only one leaf, or none, are not uncommon.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Role of Auxin in the Androgynophore Movement in Passiflora
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 38, 3, 301-307 (2015) Copyright © 2015, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. Printed in Brazil DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738320140377 Research Article Exploring the role of auxin in the androgynophore movement in Passiflora Livia C.T. Scorza and Marcelo Carnier Dornelas Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Abstract The flowers of the species belonging to the genus Passiflora show a range of features that are thought to have arisen as adaptations to different pollinators. Some Passiflora species belonging to the subgenus Decaloba sect. Xerogona, show touch-sensitive motile androgynophores. We tested the role of auxin polar transport in the modula- tion of the androgynophore movement by applying auxin (IAA) or an inhibitor of auxin polar transport (NPA) in the flowers. We recorded the movement of the androgynophore during mechano-stimulation and analyzed the duration, speed, and the angle formed by the androgynophore before and after the movement, and found that both IAA and NPA increase the amplitude of the movement in P. sanguinolenta. We hypothesize that auxin might have a role in modulating the fitness of these Decaloba species to different pollination syndromes and demonstrate that an interspecific hybrid between insect- and hummingbird-pollinated Xerogona species present a heterosis effect on the speed of the androgynophore movement. Keywords: Passiflora, androgynophore, IAA, NPA, thigmotropism. Received: December 18, 2014; Accepted: April 15, 2015. Introduction Recently, we showed that in some Passiflora species, The genus Passiflora comprises about 500 species the androgynophore can also be a thigmotropic structure, which are mostly woody vines that present a huge diversity i.e., it has the capability to move in response to touch and in flower shape, colors and sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter Vol 48, No 2, June 2019
    Byblis in cultivation in the tropics and in temperate climates Gregory Allan • Birmingham • United Kingdom • [email protected] Cindy Chiang • Singapore • [email protected] This article has been written based mostly on the authors’ experiences in growing Byblis in the UK and in Singapore. It is hoped that growers in regions with different climates will be able to extrapo- late from the information provided here, adjusting the methods described below to suit their own growing conditions. Hopefully much of the information provided here is universal in its application. Introduction If any genus of carnivorous plants deserves to be better known, both by horticulturalists and botanists, it is Byblis. The common name (ironically rarely used by enthusiasts) for the genus is “rainbow plants”, on account of the prismatic effect that can be produced when the sun shines on their copiously-produced sticky glands. All species follow a basic morphological plan: they have a central stem from which radiate numerous filiform leaves and scapes with showy flowers that typi- cally have purple petals (although white forms of most species are known) and vivid yellow anthers. Virtually all parts of the plants are covered in mucilage-tipped stalked glands (colloquially referred to as “tentacles”), which efficiently capture small insects, as well as microscopic sessile digestive glands. Another interesting characteristic of the genus is the presence of pulvini in most, if not all, species. Pulvini are swellings at the base of pedicels which, usually after successful pollination, uti- lize hydraulics to bend the pedicel, and consequently the developing fruit, downwards towards the ground. This phenomenon was discovered by Brian Barnes in the early 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sarracenia) Provide a 21St-Century Perspective on Infraspecific Ranks and Interspecific Hybrids: a Modest Proposal* for Appropriate Recognition and Usage
    Systematic Botany (2014), 39(3) © Copyright 2014 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364414X681473 Date of publication 05/27/2014 Pitcher Plants (Sarracenia) Provide a 21st-Century Perspective on Infraspecific Ranks and Interspecific Hybrids: A Modest Proposal* for Appropriate Recognition and Usage Aaron M. Ellison,1,5 Charles C. Davis,2 Patrick J. Calie,3 and Robert F. C. Naczi4 1Harvard University, Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366, U. S. A. 2Harvard University Herbaria, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U. S. A. 3Eastern Kentucky University, Department of Biological Sciences, 521 Lancaster Avenue, Richmond, Kentucky 40475, U. S. A. 4The New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York 10458, U. S. A. 5Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Chuck Bell Abstract—The taxonomic use of infraspecific ranks (subspecies, variety, subvariety, form, and subform), and the formal recognition of interspecific hybrid taxa, is permitted by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. However, considerable confusion regarding the biological and systematic merits is caused by current practice in the use of infraspecific ranks, which obscures the meaningful variability on which natural selection operates, and by the formal recognition of those interspecific hybrids that lack the potential for inter-lineage gene flow. These issues also may have pragmatic and legal consequences, especially regarding the legal delimitation and management of threatened and endangered species. A detailed comparison of three contemporary floras highlights the degree to which infraspecific and interspecific variation are treated inconsistently.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Carnivory for Darlingtonia Californica (Sarraceniaceae): Evidence from Relationships Among Leaf Traits1
    American Journal of Botany 92(7): 1085±1093. 2005. THE COST OF CARNIVORY FOR DARLINGTONIA CALIFORNICA (SARRACENIACEAE): EVIDENCE FROM RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LEAF TRAITS1 AARON M. ELLISON2,4 AND ELIZABETH J. FARNSWORTH3 2Harvard University, Harvard Forest, P.O. Box 68, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366 USA; and 3New England Wild Flower Society, 180 Hemenway Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701 USA Scaling relationships among photosynthetic rate, foliar nutrient concentration, and leaf mass per unit area (LMA) have been observed for a broad range of plants. Leaf traits of the carnivorous pitcher plant Darlingtonia californica, endemic to southern Oregon and northern California, USA, differ substantially from the predictions of these general scaling relationships; net photosynthetic rates of Darlingtonia are much lower than predicted by general scaling relationships given observed foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations and LMA. At ®ve sites in the center of its range, leaf traits of Darlingtonia were strongly correlated with elevation and differed with soil calcium availability and bedrock type. The mean foliar N : P of 25.2 6 15.4 of Darlingtonia suggested that these plants were P-limited, although N concentration in the substrate also was extremely low and prey capture was uncommon. Foliar N : P stoichiometry and the observed deviation of Darlingtonia leaf traits from predictions of general scaling relationships permit an initial assessment of the ``cost of carnivory'' in this species. Carnivory in plants is thought to have evolved in response to N limitation, but for Darlingtonia, carnivory is an evolutionary last resort when both N and P are severely limiting and photosynthesis is greatly reduced. Key words: carnivorous plants; Darlingtonia californica; fens; leaf mass area; leaf traits; photosynthesis; nitrogen; serpentine.
    [Show full text]