DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Case Study Water Wars on the Klamath

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Case Study Water Wars on the Klamath Environmental Case Study Water Wars on the Klamath Until a century ago, the Klamath River was the third most productive salmon fishery south of the Canadian border. The 35 km (22 mi) long Upper Klamath Lake, the largest lake in the Pacific Northwest, once contained great schools of C’wam and Qapdo (Lost River and shortnose suckers). Millions of hectares of marshes, lakes, and dry steppe in the Klamath Basin teemed with waterfowl and wildlife. At least 80 percent of the birds following the Pacific Flyway stopped to feed in the area. Native American tribes, including the Klamath and Paiute in the upper basin, and the Yurok and Hupa downstream, depended on the abundant fish and wildlife for their survival. The United States’ first waterfowl refuge, the Lower Klamath Wildlife Refuge, was established in 1908 to protect the area’s critical habitat. In 1905 the newly formed United States Bureau of Reclamation was directed to “reclaim the sunbaked prairies and worthless swamps” in the upper Klamath Basin. Spending $50 million, the bureau built 7 dams, 45 pumping stations, and more than 1,600 km (1,000 mi) of canals and ditches. The project drained three-quarters of the wetlands in the upper basin, and provided irrigation water to 90,000 ha (220,000 acres) of cropland. Promises of cheap land and subsidized water lured some 1,400 farmers to the valley to grow potatoes, alfalfa, sugar beets, mint, onions, and cattle. In the 1990s, irrigators in the Klamath Basin used almost 1 million acre-feet (325 billion gallons or 1.2 trillion liters) of surface water per year. These water diversions left salmon stranded in dried-up streams, while oxygen- depleted lake water was contaminated with agricultural runoff and clogged with algae. Downstream, Native American tribes and commercial fishermen, who once had brought in about 500,000 kg (roughly a million pounds) of salmon per year, saw their catches decline by as much as 90 percent. More than 7,000 jobs were lost when the fisheries collapsed. In 1997, the C’wam and Qapdo were declared endangered, and Coho salmon were listed as threatened. A coalition of commercial and sports fishermen, environmentalists, and native people sued the government for damaging fish and wildlife resources. A federal judge agreed, and ordered the Bureau of Reclamation to reduce irrigation flow and to maintain minimum water levels in rivers and lakes. A severe drought in 2001 precipitated a crisis. For the first time in its history, the bureau closed the gates on its irrigation canals and cut off water to the farmers. Outraged farmers broke open the headgate locks and released water into drying fields. News media flocked to the site to film the confrontation. Wildlife enthusiasts and hunters clamored for the return of the water to the river and the area’s wetlands. Farmers fumed over lost profits. The irrigation headgates were closed again. Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Environmental Case Study Water Wars on the Klamath Then Republican National Committee strategist Karl Rove stepped in to this small, remote conflict. Rove and other conservative politicians publicized the debate around the property rights of farmers—a concern shared by farmers and conservatives across the nation. Following Rove’s advice, Interior Secretary Gale Norton flew to the site and, with great publicity, reopened the irrigation headgates. Norton suggested that the Klamath water dispute could be best resolved by the free market. She proposed a “water bank,” with which farmers could voluntarily sell surplus water to Indian tribes or the Fish and Wildlife Service. The tribes and wildlife groups objected that this approach would only work when water was abundant. In critical drought years, wildlife and fish would perish. Conservationists argue that irrigation practices should change. Two-thirds of the basin uses flood irrigation, which loses about 50 percent of water to evaporation. Farmers could install sprinkler systems or switch to less water-intensive crops. Farmers counter that their survival depends on Klamath water. Denial of water rights constitutes unlawful “takings” that threaten their livelihoods. Property rights activists argue that water is a property right accorded to landowners, not to wildlife and fish. Meanwhile, because of several poor spawning years, California’s 2006 salmon fishing quotas were cut, costing thousands of fishery workers an estimated $100 million in fishing revenues. Wildlife refuges and wilderness areas Watershed Crater Lake N.P. CHILOQUIN Oregon Upper Klamath Lake KLAMATH FALLS er Riv ath TULELAKE m la K Lower Klamath Wildlife Refuge Tule Lake California 0 1020304050 MILES Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 2 Environmental Case Study Water Wars on the Klamath Conflicting demands for dwindling resources often lead to complex disputes. What would you do if you were Secretary of the Interior? What arguments would you use to resolve this dispute? What goals are achieved and lost when the national spotlight turns on a local debate? How would you weigh the rights of farmers and fish, and of fisheries and landowners? Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case for Dam Removal on the Klamath S
    Building The Case for Dam Removal on the Klamath S. Craig Tucker, Ph.D. Klamath Campaign Coordinator Karuk Tribe 12/12/03 Pacificorp, a subsidiary of the large multinational power corporation Scottish Power, is in the process of relicensing its Klamath River dams. Since hydropower dams are relicensed only once every 30-50 years, relicensing represents a once in a lifetime opportunity to change flow regimes or decommission dams. The Karuk Tribe believes that the removal of dams on the Klamath should be fully evaluated as dam removal appears to be key in the restoration of native fishes to the upper basin. Our position is supported by sound science and policy research. These dams contribute little to the energy supply1 The California Energy Commission (CEC) reviewed the energy affects of full or partial decommissioning. Their conclusions were that: “Because of the small capacity of the Klamath hydro units…removal of these units will not have a significant reliability impact on a larger regional scale.” The report went on to state: “…decommissioning is a feasible alternative from the perspective of impacts to statewide electricity resource adequacy and that replacement energy is available in the near term.” The National Academy of Science recommends a full evaluation of dam removal2 A recent report by the most prestigious scientific minds in America, the National Academy of Science, recommends that: “serious evaluation should be made of the benefits to coho salmon from the elimination of Dwinell Dam [on the Shasta River] and Iron Gate Dam on the grounds that these dams block substantial amounts of coho habitat…” The California State Water Resources Control Board calls for dam removal studies3 The California State Water Resources Control Board is one party involved in the relicensing of the Klamath Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes, Volume II: Tribal Case
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region This page intentionally left blank. OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies David Ball Rosie Clayburn Roberta Cordero Briece Edwards Valerie Grussing Janine Ledford Robert McConnell Rebekah Monette Robert Steelquist Eirik Thorsgard Jon Townsend Prepared under BOEM-NOAA Interagency Agreement M12PG00035 by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Makah Tribe Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Yurok Tribe National Marine Sanctuary Foundation US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region December 31, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region, Camarillo, CA, through Interagency Agreement Number M12PG00035 with the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report can be downloaded from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Recently Completed Environmental Studies – Pacific webpage at https://www.boem.gov/Pacific-Completed-Studies/.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project (Oregon State
    Oregon State University Extension Service Special Report 1037 December 2002 Water Allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: An Assessment of Natural Resource, Economic, Social, and Institutional Issues with a Focus on the Upper Klamath Basin William S. Braunworth, Jr. Assistant Extension Agriculture Program Leader Oregon State University Teresa Welch Publications Editor Oregon State University Ron Hathaway Extension agriculture faculty, Klamath County Oregon State University Authors William Boggess, department head, Department of William K. Jaeger, associate professor of agricul- Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon tural and resource economics and Extension State University agricultural and resource policy specialist, Oregon State University William S. Braunworth, Jr., assistant Extension agricultural program leader, Oregon State Robert L. Jarvis, professor of fisheries and University wildlife, Oregon State University Susan Burke, researcher, Department of Agricul- Denise Lach, codirector, Center for Water and tural and Resource Economics, Oregon State Environmental Sustainability, Oregon State University University Harry L. Carlson, superintendent/farm advisor, Kerry Locke, Extension agriculture faculty, University of California Intermountain Research Klamath County, Oregon State University and Extension Center Jeff Manning, graduate student, Department of Patty Case, Extension family and community Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University development faculty, Klamath County, Oregon Reed Marbut, Oregon Water Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Klamath Basin, Tule Lake Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 1-2.01 • County: Modoc, Siskiyou • Surface Area: 85,930 Acres (135 Square Miles)
    North Coast Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Upper Klamath Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Upper Klamath Basin, Tule Lake Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 1-2.01 • County: Modoc, Siskiyou • Surface Area: 85,930 acres (135 square miles) An important note on the status of the groundwater resources in the Tule Lake Subbasin, is that, historically, groundwater use in the basin has been relatively minor. Since about 1905, when the Bureau of Reclamation began building the Klamath Project to provide surface water to agriculture on reclaimed land in the Klamath Basin, abundant surface water supplies have been available. In the 2001 Klamath Project Operation, water requirements for two sucker fish species in the upper basin and the coho salmon in the lower basin led the USBR to reduce surface water deliveries to the farmers to 26 percent of normal. The already existing drought conditions were further exacerbated by the operational drought. In 2001, drought emergencies were declared for the Klamath Basin by the governors of both California and Oregon. Governor Davis called upon California’s legislature to fund an Emergency Well Drilling Program in the Tulelake Irrigation District (TID). The governor also requested funding for a Hydrogeologic Investigation to evaluate new and future groundwater development. The emergency measures were taken because the TID had no alternate water supply for the nearly 75,000 acres in the district and farmers were faced with economic disaster. Ten large-capacity irrigation wells were constructed within the irrigation district for the emergency program. Four of the ten wells produce 10,000 gpm and greater. The lowest yielding well produces 6,000 gpm.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10 Open-File Report 2012–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Meteorological and water quality monitoring site MDN on Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, with Mt. McLoughlin in the background. (Photograph by D. Blake Eldridge, U.S. Geological Survey, July 12, 2011.) Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10 By D. Blake Eldridge, Sara L. Caldwell Eldridge, Liam N. Schenk, Dwight Q. Tanner, and Tamara M. Wood Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Open-File Report 2012–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Eldridge. D.B., Caldwell Eldridge, S.L., Schenk, L.N., Tanner, D.Q., and Wood, T.M., 2012, Water-quality data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1142, 32 p. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yurok Final Brief
    Case 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Document 107 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 22 JEFFREY H. WOOD, Acting Assistant Attorney General 1 Environment & Natural Resources Division 2 SETH M. BARSKY, Chief S. JAY GOVINDAN, Assistant Chief 3 ROBERT P. WILLIAMS, Sr. Trial Attorney KAITLYN POIRIER, Trial Attorney 4 U.S. Department of Justice 5 Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section 6 Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 7 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: 202-307-6623; Fax: 202-305-0275 8 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 9 10 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 YUROK TRIBE, et al., ) 15 Case No. 3:16-cv-06863-WHO ) 16 Plaintiff, ) ) 17 FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE v. ) TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ 18 ) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, et al., ) JUDGMENT AND/OR STAY OF 19 ) ENFORCEMENT (ECF No. 101) Defendants, ) 20 ) 21 and ) ) 22 KLAMATH WATER USERS ) ASSOCIATION, et al., ) 23 ) 24 Defendant-Intervenors. ) 25 26 27 28 1 Federal Defendants’ Response to Intervenors’ Motion for Relief 3:16-cv-6863-WHO Case 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Document 107 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 22 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION 3 3 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 5 4 A. Hydrologic Conditions In Water Year 2018 5 5 B. 2013 Biological Opinion Requirements for Suckers 5 6 III. DISCUSSION 7 7 A. Given Hydrologic Conditions, Guidance Measures 1 8 and 4 Cannot Both Be Implemented As They Were Designed Without Impermissibly Interfering With 9 Conditions Necessary to Protect Endangered Suckers 7 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Basin Food System Assessment Karuk Tribe Data a Survey About Access to Food for Tribal People in the Klamath Basin
    Klamath Basin Food System Assessment Karuk Tribe Data A survey about access to food for Tribal people in the Klamath Basin The Karuk Tribe and the University of California at Berkeley December 5, 2016 This project is supported by the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Food Security Grant # 2012-68004-20018 Acknowledgements and Disclaimer The data provided in this internal report represent a portion of the survey results gleaned through a larger food assessment study conducted as part of a 5 year USDA-NIFA-AFRI food security project titled, Enhancing Tribal Health and Food Security in the Klamath Basin by Building a Sustainable Regional Food System. The data in this report reflects a preliminary compilation and summary of the survey data. Further analysis and interpretation of the results will be forthcoming in a final report and in articles and publications, which will be available on the following website: https://nature.berkeley.edu/karuk-collaborative/ The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the U.S. government, but that of the authors. The survey was co-designed by members of the Karuk Tribe’s Department of Natural Resources’ Lisa Hillman, Leaf Hillman, and Bill Tripp, in consultation with the Karuk Resources Advisory Board, together with UC Berkeley Cooperative Extension Specialist Jennifer Sowerwine, and research assistant Sara Reid. Data analysis was conducted by Megan Mucioki, post- doctoral researcher at UC Berkeley. Special thanks go to other members of the Klamath Basin Food Security team especially Dan Sarna, Frank Lake and Edith Friedman and to all the survey respondents who contributed their knowledge and experiences to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Fire on the Klamath Basin Traditional/Prescribed Burning & Wildfires Anthony Ulmer June 16-August 21, 2014 Klamath Basin Tribal Youth Program
    1 The Effects of Fire on the Klamath Basin Traditional/Prescribed burning & Wildfires Anthony Ulmer June 16-August 21, 2014 Klamath Basin Tribal Youth Program 1. Abstract Wildfires, Traditional Burning, and Prescribed have been a way of shaping the landscape of the Klamath Basin for thousands of years. I’ve been researching these subjects for the past summer during my internship for the KBTYP (Klamath Basin Tribal Youth Program). In my time spent up and down the Klamath Basin I have found a great interest in fire, so I decided to write my report on it. This report will detail information about the different types of burning and how each one has a different effect on the climate of the Klamath Basin. It’s been a great experience for me and I have learned a lot from different agencies and people such as, tribal governments, tribal elders, fish and wildlife, people from various communities, and research papers. This report will mainly focus on what’s going on now and how things could be possibly changed in the future. 2 2. Introduction Traditional burning, prescribed burning, and wildfire have all played a big role in changing the landscape of the Klamath Basin. In more recent years, wildfire has dominated the press because of the unforgettable damage it can do and has caused in the past to different communities up and down the Klamath Basin, especially in areas like Orleans, Hupa, and Weitchpec, California. In remote areas such as these, fire crews and resources are often hours away, resulting in the destruction of the forest and resident structures in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • YUROK TRIBE 190 Klamath Boulevard • Post Office Box 1027 • Klamath, CA 95548
    YUROK TRIBE 190 Klamath Boulevard • Post Office Box 1027 • Klamath, CA 95548 Yurok Tribe Written Testimony Regarding H.R. 5548, Fishery Failures: Urgently Needed Disaster Declarations Act January 14th, 2020 INTRODUCTION The Yurok Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe whose reservation is located on the Lower Klamath River in Northern California, spanning from the river’s mouth at the Pacific Ocean upriver to the Yurok village of Weitchpec. With more than 6,300 tribal members, the Yurok Tribe is the largest Indian tribe in California. The fishery resources of the Klamath and Pacific Ocean are the mainstay of the life, economy, and culture of the Yurok Tribe. See Mattz v. Arnett, 412 U.S. 481, 486-87 (1973). The Klamath River Indian fishery is “not much less necessary to the existence of the [Yurok] Indians than the atmosphere they breathed.” Blake v. Arnett, 663 F.2d 906, 909 (9th Cir. 1981). A pillar of the Tribe’s legal rights is its federally reserved fishing right which was reserved in the creation of the Yurok Reservation. The Tribe enjoys commercial, subsistence, and ceremonial fishing rights on the lower 45 miles of the Klamath River which it exercises each year under strict regulation by the Yurok Tribal Government. See, Baley v United States, No. 18- 1323 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2019) (confirming Yurok fishing rights for commercial, subsistence, and ceremonial purposes). In this way, the Tribe maintains its fishing way of life. Tribal members are able to fish commercially to provide financial stability to their families, 1 ceremonially to support ancient practices necessary to maintain Yurok world balance, and for subsistence purposes to continue a fishing way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Anadromomous Fishes in the Upper Klamath River
    Distribution of Anadromomous Fishes in the Upper Klamath River Watershed Prior to Hydropower Dams— A Synthesis of the Historical Evidence fisheries history Knowledge of the historical distribution of anadromous fish is important to guide man- agement decisions in the Klamath River including ongoing restoration and regional recovery of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Using various sources, we determined the historical distribution of anadromous fish above Iron Gate Dam. Evidence for the feature largest, most utilized species, Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), was avail- ABSTRACT able from multiple sources and clearly showed that this species historically migrated upstream into tributaries of Upper Klamath Lake. Available information indicates that the distribution of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) extended to the Klamath Upper Basin as well. Coho salmon and anadromous lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) likely were distributed upstream at least to the vicinity of Spencer Creek. A population of anadro- mous sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) may have occurred historically above Iron Gate Dam. Green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki), and eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus) were restricted to the Klamath River well below Iron Gate Dam. This synthesis of available sources regarding the historical extent of these species’ upstream distribution provides key information necessary to guide management and habitat restoration efforts. Introduction John B. Hamilton Gary L. Curtis Gatschet’s statement is that salmon ascend the Klamath river twice a year, in June and again in autumn. This is in agreement with my information, that the run comes in the middlefinger Scott M. Snedaker month [sic], May–June, and that the large fish run in the fall...They ascend all the rivers David K.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Klamath River Subbasin Planning
    Middle Klamath River Subbasin Planning Final Report US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Number: 2004-PC-07 Agreement Number: 113334-G010 Prepared by Will Harling, Subbasin Planner Karuk Tribe of California Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 282 Orleans, CA 95556 Submitted November 30, 2005 ABSTRACT The objective of the Middle Klamath Sub-basin Planning program is to contribute to the restoration of anadromous fish stocks in the Klamath River by completing the tasks outlined in the proposal, which tier to the Middle Klamath Sub-basin Fisheries Resource Recovery Plan. These tasks fall into three categories: education, communication, and community based restoration. The education component is directed primarily at the public school system and summer youth educational programs. The communication and community based restoration components are directed at both the general public and at special interest groups in the subbasin. Through formation and management of a community-based watershed group, the Mid Klamath Watershed Council, the subbasin planner has empowered Middle Klamath River residents to be involved in recovery of anadromous fisheries in the Klamath River. INTRODUCTION The Klamath River historically supported large runs of salmon, steelhead, pacific lamprey and sturgeon. These runs have been steadily declining for decades due to increased anthropogenic disturbance and subsequent loss of quality habitat. These fish are an important contribution to the subsistence, sport, and commercial fishery in Northern California and Southern Oregon. Native Americans, including the Karuk Tribe, continue to harvest these fish today and therefore are major stakeholders in the Klamath Basin. The Karuk Tribe, with funding from the Klamath River Task Force, hired a Subbasin Coordinator to implement the objectives of the Middle Klamath River Subbasin Planning program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Habitat Management Alternative for Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge
    FARM/WETLAND ROTATIONAL MANAGEMENT - A HABITAT MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE FOR TULE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE INTRODUCTION Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is located in extreme Northern California in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties approximately 6 miles west of the town of Tulelake, California.The refuge is one of 6 refuges within the Klamath Basin NWR complex. Historic Tule Lake fluctuated widely from >100,000 acres (1890) to 53,000 acres (1846) (Abney 1964).Record highs and lows for the lake were undoubtably greater before written records were kept. High water marks on surrounding cliffs indicate levels 12 feet higher than the 1890 records (Abney 1964).These extremes of water level were the key to maintaining the high aquatic productivity of this ecosystem.The historic lake was bounded on the north and west by vast expanses of tule marshes which supported tremendous populations of colonial nesting waterbirds and summer resident and migratory waterfowl. In 1905, the states of Oregon and California ceded to the United States the lands under both Tule and Lower Klamath lakes.In that same year, the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) tiled Notice of Intention to utilize all unappropriated waters of the Klamath Basin (Pafford 1971) and ultimately the Klamath Project was approved.As part of the Klamath Project, the Clear Lake dam was completed in 19 10 and the Lost River diversion was completed in 1912. The Clear Lake dam was intended to store water in the Lost River basin for irrigation and the Lost River Diversion routed water directly to the Klamath River thus removing the major source of water to Tule Lake.As a result to these actions, Tule Lake receded in size.
    [Show full text]