DOCSLIB.ORG

Dermination of Regional Research and Innovation Hubs in Bulgaria: Exploring Knowledge-Based Ecosystems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dermination of Regional Research and Innovation Hubs in Bulgaria: Exploring Knowledge-Based Ecosystems DERMINATION OF REGIONAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION HUBS IN BULGARIA: EXPLORING KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECOSYSTEMS Evgeni Evgeniev, Wendy M. Purcell ОПРЕДЕЛЯНЕ НА РЕГИОНАЛНИТЕ НАУЧНОИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ И ИНОВАЦИОННИ ХЪБОВЕ В БЪЛГАРИЯ: ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ЕКОСИСТЕМИ, ОСНОВАНИ НА ЗНАНИЕТО Евгени Евгениев, Уенди М. Пърсел Abstract: The study analyzed the regional research and innovation assets in Bulgaria in order to determine the capacity of the national knowledge-based ecosystem. This assessment identified regional knowledge hubs relevant to delivery against the Innovation Strategy for Smart Specializationof Bulgaria.Тhere is substantial concentration of knowledge assets in the capital city with limited connection to regional assets. Strengthening connections among the research and innovation facilities as well as networks among knowledge workers has the potential to materially advance Bulgaria’s knowledge-based ecosystem. The knowledge economy relies upon social processes sustained by close proximity among knowledge assets creating research and innovation districts or hubs. Recognizing more explicitly the regional strengths as hubs in a connected ecosystem would advance delivery of the national smart specialization strategy. In this way, the knowledge economy would be enabled to deliver more to advance Bulgaria’s ambitious national agenda within Europe. Key words: innovation and research hubs, smart specialization strategy, knowledge-based ecosystems. Резюме: Проучването анализира регионалните научни и иновационни активи в България, за да определи капацитета на националната екосистема на знанието.Настоящата оценка идентифицира регионалните научноизследователски хъбове в съответствие с изпълнението на националната иновационна стратегия за интелигентна специализация на България. В столицата има значителна концентрация на научноизследователски активи, които имат недостатъчна взаимовръзка с регионалните активи. Укрепването на мрежите между институциите за научни изследвания и иновациите, както и установяване на мрежи сред научните изследователи, имат потенциал да допринесат съществено за подобряване на екосистемата на знанието в България. Икономиката на знанието разчита на социалните процеси, които се поддържат от близостта на активите на знанието, които създават научно изследователски области или хъбове. По- ясното признаване на силните страни на региона като хъбове в една свързана екосистема ще подкрепи изпълнението на националната стратегия за интелигентна специализация. По този начин икономиката на знанието може да постигне повече за напредъка на амбициозната национална програма на България в рамките на Европа. Ключови думи: иновационни и научноизследователски хъбове, стратегия за интелигентна специализация, екосистеми, основни на знанието. 8 Introduction The growth strategy of the European Union (EU) reliesupon the development of economic planning regions such that policy measures at a regional level are a necessary precondition for the exploitation of the research and innovation potential in the EU.1 The policy arena at the regional level includes a variety of stakeholders, including local authorities, economic and research institutions, as well as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and social actors. The cultural and spatial proximity among these and with business and industry is considered to be crucial in framing a knowledge economy underpinning the European Research Area (ERA).2 European cities as diverse as Barcelona and Eindhoven, Berlin and Rotterdam have driven forward their economic success through strong collaboration between public, private and knowledge sectors in their respective regions (Terkanli, H., 2019). The present study analyzed the regional research and innovation assets in Bulgaria in order to identify the capacity of the knowledge ecosystem. Against this assessment, the study went on to propose regional research and innovation hubs in the country in line with the national innovation strategy of smart specialization (Ministry of Economy, 2017). This study draws upon the findings of two reports (Evgeniev, E., 2017; Ministry of Education and Science, 2018) that considered data secured from meetings with over 500 stakeholders (local/regional authorities, academics, researchers, businesses, NGOs and experts), consulted in the cities of Ruse, Pleven, Blagoevgrad, Plovdiv, Varna and Burgas between February and April 2018. In addition to these six city meetings, four other meetings were held in Sofia. The consultations generated in-depth discussions, which have contributed to the analytical insights of this study, and served to illustrate significant regional disparities of the Bulgarian research and innovation system. The concept of a regional research system is represented (see Figure 1) through the interactions among three principle organizational archetypes, namely: (i) research undertaken in and with higher education institutions; (ii) private-enterprise research, which is connected to business and industrial development; and (iii) public research institutes or non-profit organizations connected with social enterprise and innovation. Figure 1: Conceptual framework of a regional research system Enterprises INNOVATION RESEARCH SYSTEM SYSTEM Universities EDUCATION SYSTEM Source: Kroll and Stahlecker, 2009. 1 See, EU 2020 Strategy, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal- policy-coordination/eu-economic-governance-monitoring-prevention-correction/european- semester/framework/europe-2020-strategy_en 2 David, P. and D. Foray (2003, p.27) talk about knowledge-based communities as agents of economic change. 9 The research system is intimately inter-connected with the innovation system and also connected to other regional socio-economic sub-systems (for example the education system and socio-economic profile of the region) (Purcell 2012; Purcell in Witty Review, 2013). While the research system itself creates knowledge and is a source of innovation,it is not necessarily focused on or geared towards the transfer or exchange of that knowledge to create economic and/or social value. The transfer of knowledge is considered to be part of the innovation system, which is fostered by a range of enterprises from individual entrepreneurs and social enterprises through to large multinational corporations. The tertiary (higher) education system (typically universities and technical colleges) is linked with the development of human capital, in terms of both knowledge and skills, but it tends not to be involved in workforce planning at a national level. There is however a clear connection with research work, with quality research undertaken in universities as well the training of PhD and Masters students. In this way, universities serve as an organizational bridge between research and innovation, with business and enterprise serving as bridging organizations between research and innovation (Krolland Stahlecker, 2009). This means that we must include the consideration of private enterprises alongside research institutes and universitieswhen research policy and strategy aredeveloped. The regional knowledge systems in the EU, with their specific characteristics, are more than just the sum of their national research systems. Given the degree of autonomy and socio-economic profile of member states, the regional knowledge ecosystems differ substantially in terms of technological capability and innovation capacity and the ERA seeks to provide a framework that encourages collaboration such that the overall capacity is increased. A regional knowledge ecosystem is an analytical concept which accommodates the presence of regional actors (enterprises, public and private research and higher education institutions) in which research is performed as a core activity and this is networked with other parts of the economy; this applies to strongly to so-called applied research and is also relevant in the consideration of basic „bue-skies‟ research (Witty report, 2013; Ministry of Economy and Energy, 2016). The national policy context for the present study is given in order to articulate the inputs and outputs of the overall knowledge system. Then, the distribution and role of universities and research institutes is described at the regional level alongside the socio- economic profile of the regions. Finally, potential regional research and innovation hubs are proposed in line with delivery against Bulgaria‟s smart specialization strategy and overall economic ambitions. Policy Context Given that national efforts to secure global competitiveness are enabled by policies and instruments to improve research and innovation in business, the present study has explored how Bulgaria‟s knowledge ecosystem can be strengthened (Ministry of Education and Science, 2018). Innovative and technology-driven firms are supported by targeted government interventions and EU policies are focused on these processes through targeted funding under EU Structural Funds and competitive programs. For example, Horizon 2020, COST, COSME and other programs, bring science and business closer in an effort to drive the knowledge economy. Bulgaria, as a member state, has yet to fully develop its national innovation and research capacity to be able to fully benefit from such EU instruments. The term “smart specialization” came to the fore in Bulgaria in 2012. A series of analytical studies were prepared to support the development of an Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialization (IS3) for Bulgaria, as required by the European Commission in the form of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science As a Tool for Social Development
    Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives Terziev, V., pp. 117-134 Vol. 5 Issue: 3/ September 2020 SCIENCE AS A TOOL FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Venelin Terziev1 Abstract Defining social efficiency and social technology is the core element of assessment methods and models, taking into account a wide range of objective and subjective factors. The assessment methods of social programmes (projects) efficiency are related to the social system’s orientation towards social protection and social services of the population and the use of the process approach and the transition to programme-target methods, outlining the main issues and mechanisms for social services and tasks for assessment, determining the basic requirements for efficiency assessment of social programming and the various stages. Considering all these matters, the research offers social programming efficiency assessment model based on “organizational efficiency” approach that covers a number of certain elements: system for resources acquisition, choice of goals, assessment of the impact on the external environment, choice of strategy, following the “what if” principle and the priorities of social activity, arising from the dynamic changes in social environment. Special emphasis is put on the differentiated effect on higher education institutions, depending on the field in which universities carry out teaching and research activities, as well as on the peculiarities of the university business model in the changing environment for development of the higher education institutions. Keywords: Social economy, social development,higher education, science, WoS JEL Codes: O00, O20, I20, I21, P41 Citation : Terziev, V. (2020). Science as a Tool for Social Development. Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives, Vol 5(3), 117-134.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT and Innovation Demand
    INNOVATION.BG 2012 INNOVATION.BG 2012 INNOVATION.BG APPLIED RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS FUND The Applied Research and Communications Fund is a Bulgarian research non-profit organization, registered in public benefit, established in 1991. Its mission is to support the development of innovation and the knowledge economy in Bulgaria through: advice and advocacy on establishing national, regional and local level policies and strategies for the country’s successful integration into the global innovation economy; research and analyses of development trends and policy options for supporting innovation as well as information and communication technologies; public-private partnerships among businesses, public institutions, the academic community and civil InnovationInnovation ИНОВАЦИИ.БГ 2012 WWW.ARCFUND.NETWWW.ARCFUND.NET 20122012 society for addressing specific issues of ICT and innovation based competitiveness. BGBG The Applied Research and Communications Fund has set up two functional units for the provision of IT and consulting services: European Innovation Centre – Bulgaria is part of the largest information and consultancy support network in Europe: Enterprise Europe Network, and coordinates its work in Bulgaria. The Network aims Innovation Product to assist small and medium-sized enterprises in their innovation potential development and to raise their awareness about the European Commission’s business-oriented policies. ARC Consulting EOOD is the consulting arm of the Applied Research and Communications Fund. The company offers consulting services in the fields of innovation and information and communication Entrepreneurship technologies, as well as advisory services in the design and implementation of national and international Èíîâàöèè INNOVATION.BG 2012 projects under the EU Framework Programs, the Cohesion and Structural Funds.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIRST TEN YEARS Ivan Derzhanski, Olena Siruk 1. Authors
    Serdica J. Computing 11 (2017), No 1, 1–8 Serdica Journal of Computing Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Institute of Mathematics and Informatics SERDICA JOURNAL OF COMPUTING: THE FIRST TEN YEARS Ivan Derzhanski, Olena Siruk Abstract. Serdica Journal of Computing has completed its first decade. On this occasion we offer some notes, statistical and otherwise, on the first ten volumes of the journal, concerning the number of authors and papers, the geographical and institutional distribution of authors’ affiliations, the structural semantic makeup, the dynamics of the editorial board, and various important developments in this period. Serdica Journal of Computing is entering its second decade. This is a good time for summing up the first. We present some statistics on the overall number of authors and papers in the first ten volumes of the journal, and the geographical and institutional distribution of authors’ affiliations. We review the rubrics and special issues and the dynamics of the editorial board. Finally we bring to memory some significant developments that have taken place. 1. Authors, papers, affiliations. The ten volumes comprise 38 issues (including 2 double ones), amounting to 4203 pages’ worth of research papers, not counting editorial articles and other material. ACM Computing Classification System (1998): A.0. Key words: academic journal production, Serdica Journal of Computing. 2 Ivan Derzhanski, Olena Siruk All told, 246 papers have been published. They have been authored by 350 people, 271 of whom (77.43%) have contributed once and 79 (22.57%) two or more times (Fig. 1). Conversely, 107 (43.50%) of the articles are monographic, 9 1 8 1 7 0 6 4 5 7 4 10 3 16 2 40 1 271 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Rights for Breeder's Achievements in Bulgaria
    967 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24 (No 6) 2018, 967–974 Intellectual property rights for breeder’s achievements in Bulgaria Maria Markova University of National and World Economy, Sofi a, Bulgaria E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Markova, M. (2018). Intellectual property rights for breeder’s achievements in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(6), 967–974 The aim of this article is to present the author’s point of view and perspective on protection of the results of Bulgarian institutes, centers and other research units in the Bulgarian agriculture science as breeder’s achievements, to present analytical results and to outline the trends in the fi eld of agribusiness. Subject of this article are research inventive achievements in the agribusiness area in Bulgaria, especially plant variet- ies and animal breeds. The special point of the subject of the study is the protection of these results as intellectual property, particularly new varieties of plants and new animal breeds under the Law for Protection of Plant Varieties and Animal Breeds (LPNPVAB) as legislative requirements for protection according to the Law, legal results - quantitative trends and a factor analysis, the list of the main right holders of the protected breeder’s achievements. The practical focus of this article is the analysis of the registration activity of the Bulgarian researchers, scientifi c institutions and companies in agricultural biotech- nologies for the period of 1999-2017 (acting new LPNPVAB) within the Bulgarian patent offi ce as a national responsible authority in intellectual property rights. Keywords: intellectual property rights; breeder’s achievements; plant varieties; animal breeds; biotechnology in agribusiness Introduction opment Program, 2014-2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Code Application Reference Number PIC Organisation Name Address Postcode City Country ECHE Valid from ECHE Valid Until
    Erasmus Code Application Reference Number PIC Organisation name Address Postcode City Country ECHE valid from ECHE valid until BG ALBENA01 220528-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 949581695 VISSHE UCHILISHTE PO MENIDZHMANT 3, BULGARIA STREET 9300 DOBRICH Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG BLAGOEV02 66224-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 999866980 SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY NEOFIT RILSKI 66 Ivan Mihailov Str. 2700 BLAGOEVGRAD Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG BLAGOEV03 211054-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 949643678 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN BULGARIA 1 Georgi Izmirliev Square 2700 BLAGOEVGRAD Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG BLAGOEV04 270635-EPP-1-2016-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 935425030 KOLEJ PO TURIZAM BLAGOEVGRAD pol. Dimov, 1 2700 Blagoevgrad Bulgaria 1/01/2016 31/12/2023 BG BOTEVGR02 245851-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 949302626 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL GURKO STREET 14 2140 BOTEVGRAD Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG BOURGAS01 81115-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 968938433 BURGASKI SVOBODEN UNIVERSITET 62, SAN STEFANO STREET 8001 BURGAS Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG BOURGAS02 234083-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 986554506 PROF DR ASEN ZLATAROV UNIVERSITY 1, PROF. YAKIMOV STR. 8010 BURGAS Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG GABROVO01 83167-EPP-1-2014-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 956192439 TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY - GABROVO 4 HADJI DIMITAR STR., 5300 GABROVO 5300 GABROVO Bulgaria 1/01/2014 31/12/2023 BG PERNIK01 271317-EPP-1-2016-1-BG-EPPKA3-ECHE 973824420 EUROPEAN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY 23 Sv. SV. KIRIL I METODIY STR.
    [Show full text]
  • RRI-Practice National Case Study Report BULGARIA
    REPORT FROM NATIONAL CASE STUDY Bulgaria Deliverable 8.1. Work Package 8 Project title: Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice (RRI-Practice) Grant Agreement no: 709637 Funding Programme: Horizon 2020 Project Coordinator: Hogskolen I Oslo Og Akershus (HIOA), Norway Project website: www.rri-practice.eu Organisation responsible for ARC Fund the deliverable: Author(s): Zoya Damianova, Marko Hajdinjak, Evgeni Evgeniev, Konstantin Ivanov, Ognian Shentov Date of delivery: 27.07.2018 Dissemination level: PUBLIC Abstract This report presents the findings from the Bulgarian case study, including the reviews and outlooks for ARC Fund (research performing organisation) and the Ministry of Education and Science and the National Science Fund (research funding organisations). 1 Contents 1. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction: about the report ........................................................................................................ 8 3. Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Analytic approach .................................................................................................................. 10 3.2 National mapping ................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Document analysis ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]