Orthodox Judaism Reflection Points Action Points

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orthodox Judaism Reflection Points Action Points 12 Orthodox Judaism Reflection Points Orthodox Judaism received its earliest formulation in Hungary which was then part of the Austro-Hungarian empire in the first quarter of the 19th century, and in Germany in the middle of the century. In both countries traditionalists were profoundly critical of the efforts of Reform Jews to adapt halakhah to modern society as well as modify the traditional synagogue service. These reformers argued that such alterations were a precondition for Jewish emancipation as well as civil equality. Such an attitude was viewed by traditionalists as a ’ violation of God s will. At the end of the nineteenth century, Eastern European Orthodox leaders similarly championed Torah Judaism in the face of increased secularization. Today, the vast majority of Orthodox Jews reside in Israel or the United States. In Israel religiously observant Jews make up about 15-20 per cent of the Jewish population. These traditionalists, who were once marginal to Israeli society, play an increasingly important role in communal and political life. Within their ranks the Edah Haredit (community of the pious) consist of several thousand families with thousands of sympathizers. These are the most intransigent of the Orthodox. They relate to the state of Israel with varying degrees of hostility. A more moderate neo-traditionalism is found in Israeli Agudah circles. There the heads of the yeshivot and a number of Hasidic rebbeyim are dominant. In the United States, traditionalists have been supportive of their own institutions. With the exception of pockets of neo- traditional extremists like the Edah Haredit in Israel, American Orthodox Jews are generally familiar with modern culture and most are willing to work with the non-Orthodox on behalf of general Jewish interests. In assessing the nature of Orthodox Judaism, you should ask yourself whether such traditionalism is vital for Jewish existence. Is it the strictly Orthodox who are the true inheritors of the Jewish past? Or, should this group be perceived simply as one among many branches of the faith? Over the last two hundred years the strictly Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews have been deeply divided about their interpretations of Jewish existence. Today this conflict is as intense as ever. Is there any possibility of reconciliation? Or, should one simply accept that there is no way that rival claims can be reconciled? Action Points ‘ ’ ‘ Go to Google. Type in such terms as strictly Orthodox , Orthodox ’ ‘ ’ ‘ ’ Judaism , Modern Orthodox Judaism and Haredim . Look for websites that provide a picture of the Orthodox interpretation of Judaism. Go to Amazon.com. Look for books dealing with Orthodoxy. If possible, attend a service at an Orthodox synagogue. 13 Hasidism Reflection Points In the eighteenth century, Hasidism emerged as a challenge to the rabbinic establishment. Founded by the Baal Shem Tov, this pietistic movement stressed the importance of eliminating selfhood and the ascent of the soul to the divine light. Unlike the arid scholasticism of traditional Judaism, Hasidism offered to the Jewish masses a new outlet for religious fervour. According to tradition, the Baal Shem Tov (Israel ben Eleazer) was born in Southern Poland and in his twenties journeyed with his wife to the Carpathian mountains. In the 1730s he travelled to Mezibozh where he performed various miracles and instructed his disciples in kabbalistic lore. By the 1740s he had attracted a considerable number of disciples in kabbalistic lore; subsequently they passed on his teaching. After his death in 1760, Dov Baer became the leader of this sect and Hasidism spread to other parts of Eastern Europe. Hasidism initiated a profound change in Jewish religious pietism. In the medieval period, the Hasidei Ashkenaz attempted to achieve perfection through various mystical activities. This tradition was carried on by Lurianic kabbalists who engaged in various forms of self-mortification. In opposition to such ascetic practices, the Baal Shem Tov and his followers emphasized the omnipresence of God. For Hasidic Judaism, there is no place where God is ’ absent. As the Baal Shem Tov explained, in every one of a person s troubles, physical and spiritual, even in that trouble God himself is present. A central feature of this new movement was the institution of the zaddik which gave expression to a widespread disillusionment with rabbinic leadership. According to Hasidism, the zaddikim are spiritual superior individuals who have attained the highest level of cleaving to God. The goal of the zaddik is to elevate the souls of his flock to the divine light. His tasks included pleading to God for his people, immersing himself in their everyday affairs, and counselling and strengthening them. Today, Hasidism has been a powerful force in Jewish life around the world. In Israel and the United States in particular, the various branches of Hasidism play and important role in the Jewish community. What do you make of this movement? Like the strictly Orthodox, Hasidic Jews adhere to the tradition, maintaining that only the Torah observant can live a truly authentic Jewish existence. Do you agree? And what do you make of the institution of the zaddik (or rebbe)? In an increasingly secularized world, is there a place for such charismatic religious leaders? Action Points ‘ ’ ‘ ’ ‘ Go to Google. Type in such terms as Hasidism , zaddik , Hasidic ’ Judaism . Look for websites which describe the nature of Hasidism, as well as others put on the web by the Hasidim themselves. Go to Amazon.com. Look for books dealing with Hasidic Judaism. If you live in a city where there are Hasidim, find out where they reside and go see them for yourself. 14 Conservative Judaism Reflection Points Conservative Judaism emerged out of the Reform movement as a reaction against its radical tendencies. In 1845 Zacharias Frankel broke ranks with other reformers, and subsequently became head of the Jewish Theological Seminary in Breslau. In the United States, a number of like-minded adherents of the positive-historical approach to Judaism established the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York which was later headed by the Cambridge scholar Solomon Schechter. As Conservative Judaism expanded in the 1920s and 1930s, a degree of uniformity was instituted within the movement, yet there was a general reluctance on the part of most thinkers to enunciate a comprehensive philosophy. Yet, as time passed there was an attempt to invest authority in official committees empowered with the responsibility to determine the central principles of Conservative Judaism. Like Reform Judaism, the Conservative movement has distanced itself from the traditional understanding of divine revelation. The Torah is perceived as a composite work containing various strands of tradition, dating from different periods in the history of ancient Israel. As a result, there is considerable uncertainty about the status of both Jewish belief and observance. Some traditionalists assert that Scriptural and rabbinic law remains authoritative. Others press for halakhic change. The same lack of consensus is found in the sphere of halakhic interpretation. In general, Conservative Jews accept that the halakhah has a pivotal role to play in the modern world. Yet within the movement there are widely discrepant patterns of observance. What do you make of such a lack of uniformity of belief and practice? Unlike Orthodoxy with its all-embracing belief system and code of law, Conservative Judaism offers a more flexible approach to the tradition. Torah observant Jews argue, however, that the central weakness of Conservatism is its lack of consistency and internal disharmony over the fundamentals of the faith. Do you agree? Or, do you think that such openness is in fact its greatest strength in providing a means whereby modern Jews can adapt their heritage to contemporary circumstances? Action Points Go to Google. Type in 'Conservative Judaism' and look for websites about Conservative Judaism as well as official websites of the movement. Go to Amazon.com. Look for books dealing with Conservative Judaism If possible, attend a service at a Conservative and Orthodox synagogue and compare the two experiences. 15 Reconstructionist Judaism Reflection Points According to Mordecai Kaplan, Judaism must divest itself of supernatural belief. The spiritual dimension of the faith must be reformulated in humanistic and naturalistic terms. For Kaplan, God is not a supernatural being but the power that makes for salvation. God, he wrote, is the sum of all the animating organizing forces and relationships which are forever making a cosmos out of chaos. In his view, the idea of God must be understood fundamentally in ’ ‘ ’ ‘ ’ terms of its effect. In Kaplan s view, God is a trans-natural , super-factual ‘ ’ and super-experiential transcendence which does not infringe on the law of nature. Such a notion was far removed from the biblical and rabbinic concept of God as the creator and sustainer of the universe who chose the Jewish people and guides humanity to its final destiny. ’ ’ Many of the ideas found in Kaplan s writings were reflected in the movement s religious literature. The New Haggadah for Passover, for example, applied ’ Kaplan s theology to liturgical texts, subordinating miracles and plagues in ’ the traditional Haggadah to the narrative of Israel s redemption from Egypt. The Sabbath Prayer Book was designed for those who were dissatisfied with — synagogue worship its aim was to arouse emotion by eliminating theologically untenable passages and adding inspirational material drawn from tradition. This new prayer book deleted all references to the revelation of the Torah on Mount Sinai, the chosenness of Israel, and the doctrine of a personal Messiah. In the 1940s and 1950s, the leaders of Reconstructionist Judaism insisted that they were not attempting to form a new branch of Judaism. Throughout this period Reconstructionists hoped to be able to infuse the three major groups within North American Judaism (Orthodoxy, Conservative Judaism, Reform Judaism) with its ideas.
Recommended publications
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting Orthodoxy to American Life: Shaarey Tphiloh and the Development of Modern Orthodox Judaism in Portland,Maine,1904-1976 Michael R
    Maine History Volume 44 Article 5 Number 2 Maine Institutions & Maine Politics 4-1-2009 Adapting Orthodoxy to American Life: Shaarey Tphiloh and the Development of Modern Orthodox Judaism in Portland,Maine,1904-1976 Michael R. Cohen Tulane University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Recommended Citation Cohen, Michael R.. "Adapting Orthodoxy to American Life: Shaarey Tphiloh and the Development of Modern Orthodox Judaism in Portland,Maine,1904-1976." Maine History 44, 2 (2009): 172-195. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/ vol44/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ADAPTING ORTHODOXY TO AMERICAN LIFE: SHAAREY TPHILOH AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN ORTHODOX JUDAISM IN PORTLAND, MAINE, 1904-1976 MICHAEL R. COHEN The twentieth-century was a period of adaptation and change for Port- land’s Jewish Community. Orthodox Jews were bound by strict laws and traditions that governed their faith and their culture. However, when faced with the values and norms of traditional American society, Port- land’s Orthodox Jews had to negotiate between assimilation and main- taining their religious practices and identity. Early in the century, changes were welcomed as a way to assimilate into American society and to take advantage of economic opportunities. However, as more Ortho- dox Jews identified themselves as Americans, some members of the reli- gious community believed that important values were being compro- mised.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish Denominationalism: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
    American Voices American Jewish Denominationalism: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow David Ellenson In approaching the topic of Jewish religious denominationalism in America today, I will begin with an autobiographical “confession.” I was raised in an Orthodox synagogue, sent all of my children either to Solomon Schechter schools or Camp Ramah, was a member of a Conservative as well as a Reform congregation for over twenty years of my life, am an Associate member of the Reconstructionist Rab- binical Association as well as an alumnus of the rabbinical school of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, and currently serve as President of the premiere educational institution of the Reform Movement. My journey across denominational lines may well be instructive for a discus- sion of denominationalism, for my story of “boundary-crossings” is hardly unique among present-day American Jews. After all, denominational commitments and affiliations can be and have been approached on a host of different levels — ideolog- ical, institutional and folk. The first refers to the set of overarching general beliefs that inform the diverse movements and that are articulated by the elite leaders of each movement, while the second marks the organizational structures that mark each one. Finally, the folk level bespeaks those informal and highly eclectic sets of practices and beliefs that characterize the persons who affiliate with the diverse movements that are present in modern-day Jewish life. My journey is “instructive” precisely because it represents how permeable the borders often are for so many Jews as they traverse the diverse and multi-layered paths of modern Jewish life in their search for spiritual meaning and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox Judaism
    Orthodox Judaism General Information Orthodox Judaism teaches that the Torah, in both its written and oral form, was given to Moses directly by G-d and that strict adherence to the Torah is required of all Jews in all areas of life. This core set of beliefs unites various subgroups with significant social, cultural, and organizational differences. Within the United States, the largest of these subgroups are “Modern Orthodox” Judaism, which finds positive value in interactions with contemporary society, and “Haredi” and “Hasidic” Judaism, which advocate segregation from non-Jewish culture but not complete isolation from the secular world. More information about Orthodox Judaism can be found by going to http://www.ou.org, http://www.rabbis.org, and http://www.chabad.org. Number of Members in the U.S. and Canada: 600,000 Number of Members Worldwide: 1.8 million Official Statements on Animals Humans are the “pinnacle” of creation and have “dominion” over animals Because Orthodox Judaism is not a monolithic movement, there is no one organization with the authority to speak on behalf of the entire Orthodox community. However, the Orthodox Union, the Rabbinical Council of America, and Chabad Lubavitch do speak on behalf of a large segment of the Orthodox population. According to these organizations, G-d rules over a cosmic hierarchy and has made humans “the pinnacle of creation.” Our privileged status is accompanied by the right to exercise dominion over animals. “The Torah tell[s] us that in the beginning, when G-d created all living creatures…the
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Instruction in the Jewish Ultra Orthodox and Hassidic Communities in Toronto
    SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTION IN THE JEWISH ULTRA ORTHODOX AND HASSIDIC COMMUNITIES IN TORONTO by Marcus Benayon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Marcus Benayon, 2012 SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTION IN THE JEWISH ULTRA ORTHODOX AND HASSIDIC COMMUNITIES IN TORONTO Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Marcus Benayon Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology University of Toronto Abstract The purpose of the present study was to examine the state of special education programs in selected Jewish Ultra Orthodox (Haredi) community schools in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), and the attitudes and perceptions about special education of the Melamdim (rabbis/teachers) teaching in those schools. A Special Education course, modeled on OISE’s additional qualification program available to in-service teachers in the public sector, was administrated to 28 Melamdim. Throughout the 12 weeks, course data was collected through observations and dialogues with course participants. The impact of the special education course on classroom practices by those who engaged in the course was also assessed. In addition, a collection of pre-course and post-course data from participants (Melamdim) on attitudes and perceptions in regards to special education through a self-administrated questionnaire, took place. Four additional questionnaires were administered, examining demographic characteristics, general attitudes and behaviors, and well-being. Finally, a pre-selected group of 8 Melalmdim was interviewed as representatives of their home school and the denomination of Judaism they belong to. The results showed significant changes in attitudes of Melamdim toward the inclusion of students with Learning Disabilities (LD in regular classrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage and Sexual Behavior in the Teachings of the Kabbalah Centre
    MARRIAGE AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOR IN THE TEACHINGS OF THE KABBALAH CENTRE Jody Myers 1. Introduction Th e Kabbalah Centre is a new religious movement that seeks to dis- seminate the teachings of kabbalah to a universal audience. Founded in 1970 in the United States, it exhibits many of the characteristics associated with postmodern religious sensibility.1 Symbols from dispa- rate frameworks of meaning—including New Age ideas, psychology, physics, and capitalistic consumer culture—are utilized to interpret and communicate concepts and values rooted in twentieth century and pre-modern Jewish kabbalah. Promising that the teachings of kab- balah will bring personal fulfi llment and contentment, and addressing themselves primarily to spiritual seekers 18–45 years of age, Kabbalah Centre teachers recommend ways of fi nding a loving life partner, cre- ating a fulfi lling marriage, and sustaining an exciting and emotionally satisfying sexual relationship. Th ey suggest behaviors that conform to Jewish religious law and modern orthodox Judaism—with a notable exception on the matter of homosexuality, about which they are quite tolerant. However, they assiduously avoid explicit identifi cation with Judaism. Th eir recommendations and explanations are based on sci- entifi c reasoning, pragmatic individualism, and kabbalistic concepts shorn of their particularistic ethnic associations. Kabbalah Centre teachings are an elaboration and interpretation of the kabbalistic writings of Yehuda Ashlag (1885–1954).2 Born in Warsaw, Yehuda Ashlag received a rabbinical education and was attentive to, though not formally educated in, modern thought. He moved to Palestine in 1921 in order to devote himself more intensively to the study of kabbalah, and except for a few years spent in England, he lived in Jerusalem until his death in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Master of Liberal Studies Theses Spring 2020 The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women Risa Cole Rollins College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Cole, Risa, "The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women" (2020). Master of Liberal Studies Theses. 92. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls/92 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Liberal Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Liberal Studies By Risa Cole May, 2020 Mentor: Dr. Sharon Carnahan Reader: Dr. Wendy Brandon Rollins College Hamilton Holt School Master of Liberal Studies Program Winter Park, FL The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women By Risa Cole May, 2020 Project Approved: Sharon Carnahan, Ph.D Mentor Wendy Brandon, Ph.D Reader ______________________________________ Director, Master of Liberal Studies Program ______________________________________ Dean, Hamilton Holt School 3 The Gender and Sexuality of Jewish Women Practices and Experiences of Traditional Judaism Personal Experience of Being A Non-Religious Jewish Female in the United States This paper explores the intersection of traditional, Orthodox Judaism and modern lives of Jewish women. Drawing from the author’s personal experiences and research on Judaism and modernity, our thesis is that all Jewish women are affected by both world views in ways that are complex and multifaceted.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Views of Divine Union in Kabbalah and Tantra
    Comparative views of divine union in Kabbalah and Tantra Author: Jake Jacobs This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Theology Dept., Boston College, 2009 COMPARATIVE VIEWS OF DIVINE UNION IN KABBALAH AND TANTRA BY JAKE JACOBS This paper examines the connections between mystical Jewish Kabbalah and Tantric Yoga in the their focus on the uniting of masculine and feminine energies in the quest to experientially encounter God/ Ultimate Reality. I first look at the writings of Kabbalist Rabbi Mordechai (Marc) Gafni and of Indic religious scholar Dr. Georg Feuerstein to systematically explain role of the bond of Sefirot1 of Tiferet (masculine) and Shechinah (feminine) in Kabbalah toward the divine encounter in comparison to that of the Gods Shiva (masculine) and Shakti (feminine) in Tantric Yoga.2 I note the similarities and differences in the systems and suggest the value to each tradition that is found in the other. I then touch on the function of ethics/morality in the cosmic view of both systems as accessed in the union of male and female. Ultimately I argue that the two traditions can be mutually enriched by the encounter with the divergent ethical path of the other. I come to this task having being raised secularly Jewish, though educated as a child in a conservative synagogue. I quit my encounter with Judaism the day after my bar mitzvah and lived secularly as a high holiday Jew until the age of 35. At that time, in the midst of emotional crisis, I reentered an active engagement with Judaism through a meditative Synagogue that drew from both the Kabbalist and Chasidic traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender In/Equalities in Modern Orthodoxy: Navigating Overlapping Worlds
    Gender In/Equalities in Modern Orthodoxy: Navigating Overlapping Worlds By Kyra Borenstein Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduating with Honors Senior Honors Thesis Department of Anthropology Brandeis University May 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................3 Abstract.........................................................................................................................4 Prologue.........................................................................................................................5 Introduction..................................................................................................................8 Chapter 1: Modern Orthodoxy: Rules, Regulations, and Everyday Participation.................19 Chapter 2: Are You a Feminist? Self Identification Regarding Women’s Rights...................31 Chapter 3: Women’s Role in Prayer: Competing Interpretations of Separation in the Synagogue....................................................................................................................44 Chapter 4: Women and Leadership: A Look into How Women Do and Do Not Lead...........73 Chapter 5: Looking Like a Woman: Ideas of Gender Conformity.........................................103 Chapter 6: Women and Personhood: Women’s Right to Control Their Own Lives............127 Conclusion.................................................................................................................137
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Orthodox Judaism: a Documentary History Zev Eleff Copyrighted Material Foreword by Jacob J
    Modern Orthodox Judaism: A Documentary History Zev Eleff Copyrighted material Foreword by Jacob J. Schacter Contents List of Illustrations xxiv Foreword xxv by Jacob J. Schacter Preface xxix Acknowledgments xli Part 1. Orthodox Judaism and the Modern American Experience 1. Engaging Reform 3 Introduction 3 Section 1 | Charleston Clamorings and Other “Heresies” “Retrograde Instead of Advancing” 5 Mordecai Noah | 1825 New Lights and Old Lights 6 A Member of the Reformed Society of Israelites | 1825 This Happy Land 7 Isaac Harby | 1825 A Jewish Luther 9 Jacob Mordecai | 1826 An Open Letter to Gustavus Poznanski 12 Isaac Leeser | 1843 “Some Wolves Clothed in Sheep’s- Cover” 16 Abraham Rice | 1848 What Prevails among the Jewish People? 18 Mordecai Noah | 1850 Buy the book Modern Orthodox Judaism: A Documentary History Zev Eleff Copyrighted material Foreword by Jacob J. Schacter Section 2 | Living Orthodox Judaism This Is Religious Liberty in America 19 Abraham Kohn | 1843 Our Holy Place 20 Trustees of the Congregation Shearith Israel | 1847 Strange Misbehavior 21 Max Lilienthal | 1854 An Aunt’s Admonishment 24 Anna Marks Allen | 1858 Conclusion 25 2. The Traditional Talmud and Response to Reform Prayer Books 27 Introduction 27 Section 1 | Talking Talmud “The Talmud Is Not Divine” 28 Benjamin Cohen Carillon | 1843 At the Risk of Being Considered Hyper- orthodox 31 Henry Goldsmith | 1843 A Return to the Maimonidean View? 33 Abraham Rice | 1844 The Cleveland Conference 35 Isaac Leeser | 1855 It Is Decidedly Heretical 38 Morris J. Raphall | 1856 Section 2 | The Modified Mahzor An Ornament for Parlor- Tables 39 Bernard Illowy | 1855 A Letter from an “Enlightened Orthodox” Jew 41 Benjamin Franklin Peixotto | 1859 x Contents Buy the book Modern Orthodox Judaism: A Documentary History Zev Eleff Copyrighted material Foreword by Jacob J.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Orthodoxy: a Philosophical Perspective1
    31 Modern Orthodoxy: A Philosophical Perspective1 By: BARUCH A. BRODY1 It is common to refer to some Orthodox Jews as Modern Orthodox Jews, in contrast on the one hand to Haredị Orthodox Jews and on the other hand to Conservative and Reform Jews. But when one looks at proposed definitions of this movement, they seem to be most unsatisfactory. Some definitions (e.g., they are Orthodox Jews who are less observant), are just insulting as a definition, even if often true in practice. Other definitions (e.g., Modern Orthodox Jews are those who are active in the secular mod- ern world) neither distinguish the Modern Orthodox from many Haredị Orthodox Jews who are equally active nor offer much of a programmatic 1 I want to thank my three sons (Todd, Jeremy and Myles) and my Rabbi (Rabbi Barry Gellman) for their encouragement and wise suggestions. My dear friend, David Shatz, supplied me with many references, penetrating thoughts and en- couragement; like many others, I am greatly in his debt. Baruch Brody is the Andrew Mellon Professor of Humanities in the Department of Philosophy at Rice University and the Distinguished Emeritus Professor of Medicine and Medical Ethics at Baylor College of Medicine. During the period 1985–2012, he also served as the Director of the Ethics Program at the Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas. He has presented the result of his research both in bioethics and in philosophy in six original books and 105 peer-reviewed articles. This research was supported by six major grants from federal agencies (NIH, NASA, and VA) and by grants from the Ford Foundation and the Exxon Educational Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Jewish Religious Movements
    Modern Jewish Religious Movements Religion 251 Professor: Jason Radine Classroom: 105 Comenius Hall Office: 108 Comenius Hall, x1314 Class times: TTh 10:20-11:30am Office Hours: TTh 4:00-5:00pm E-mail: [email protected] and by appointment Course Content Modern Judaism exists in a wide spectrum of beliefs and practices, from ultra-traditional to secular humanist. This course will explore both the making of modern Judaism and the religious “map” of Jewish life today. Topics will include Hasidic Judaism, Zionism, and contemporary North American trends in Judaism. Goals of the Course This course will provide an in-depth study of Jewish life as it is lived today. As will be seen, the diversity of Jewish religious practice and belief is not simply a matter of degrees of commitment, but of divergent ideological and theological positions. This course will explore the Jewish responses to modernity, and the varied attempts to resist or embrace cultural assimilation. The phenomenon of “Jewishness” vs. Judaism will be examined, and the issue of how secularism and Jewish identity can coexist. Assignments and Grading 1) Grading will be based on four essay examinations and two research papers as well (see the Student Handbook for the academic honesty policy). The exams and papers are weighted equally, and the course grade will be based on an average of all of these assignments. Plagiarized papers will receive F grades, and will result in a one-letter grade reduction for your course grade overall at least, and a failing grade in the class at most. Students who wish to request accommodations in this class for a disability should contact Mr.
    [Show full text]