Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980S University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses July 2020 Treating the Revolution: Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980s Brittany McWilliams University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the History of Gender Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Latin American History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation McWilliams, Brittany, "Treating the Revolution: Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980s" (2020). Masters Theses. 897. https://doi.org/10.7275/17243974 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/897 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Treating the Revolution: Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980s A Thesis Presented by BRITTANY L. MCWILLIAMS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 History Treating the Revolution: Health Care and Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980s A Thesis Presented By Brittany McWilliams Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________ Kevin Young, Chair _______________________________ Joel Wolfe, Member _________________________________ Christian Appy, Member ________________________________ Audrey Altstadt, Chair Department of History ABSTRACT TREATING THE REVOLUTION: HEALTH CARE AND SOLIDARITY IN EL SALVADOR AND NICARAGUA IN THE 1980S MAY 2020 BRITTANY MCWILLIAMS, B.A., NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Kevin A. Young Health care played an important role in the revolutions of El Salvador and Nicaragua. Both the Sandinistas and the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) prioritized popular health throughout the 1980s. Clinics and hospitals served as sites of revolution that drew healthcare solidarity activists from the United States. These health internationalists worked to build community-level networks that relied upon trained medical volunteers. In both El Salvador and Nicaragua, women comprised a bulk of the community health workers. These women chose to interact with revolution by building on radical promises of universal healthcare access. Healthcare solidarity activists trained community volunteers and encouraged women to pursue their own needs within the revolutionary frameworks. Health internationalists actively undermined United States’ policies toward Central America. In the 1980s, the United States implemented economic policies and supported military violence that targeted healthcare infrastructure. In training community health workers, treating civilians, sharing knowledge through international exchange, and sending funds and medical supplies, health activists mitigated some of the damage being done. This thesis posits that health care was an important site of revolution for Central Americans and internationalists alike. By choosing to mend iii bodies, medical activists stood in direct opposition to the violence of the decade. They also served as fundamental to the revolution because they helped carry out the will of the people. The revolutions rested on the hope of improving the lives of every day Nicaraguans and Salvadorans. As the violence of the 1980s forced the guerillas of El Salvador and the leaders of Nicaragua to focus on war, the people continued to implement revolutionary health goals at the community level. This thesis argues that understanding how health internationalists, women, and community activists engaged revolutionary ideas of medicine is vital to the study of 1980s Central America. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...iii LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………….…vii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………..viii ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………….…...ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………...1 A. Background on El Salvador and Nicaragua……………………………………4 B. Scholarship……………………………………………………………………10 C. Thesis & Methodology………………………………………………………..15 2. SALVADORAN AND NICARAGUAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS………………19 A. Nicaragua: Sandinista Healthcare Reforms…………………………………..20 B. Salvadoran Health Care: A Split System……………………………………..33 C. Healthcare Access for Central American Refugees…………………………..44 D. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………53 3. HEALTHCARE SOLIDARITY……………………………………………………...55 A. “Working in the Solidarity Model”…………………………………………..56 B. The Work of Health Internationalists………………………………………...57 C. Solidarity Based in Central America…………………………………………65 D. Cultural and Economic Struggles for Health Internationalists…………….…69 E. Clinics and Hospitals: Sites of Revolution…………………………………...74 F. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………77 4. GENDERING SOLIDARITY AND HEALTH CARE………………………………78 A. Scholarship…………………………………………………………………...79 B. Gendered Impacts of Healthcare Instability………………………………….82 C. Women Working in Health…………………………………………………..88 D. Motherhood in Revolution…………………………………………...…........96 E. Gendered Solidarity in El Salvador and Nicaragua…………………………101 F. Conservative Backlash……………………………………………………....105 G. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..107 v 5. CONCLUSION: AFTER THE REVOLUTIONS…………………………………...108 APPENDICES A. POPULAR HEALTH WORK DAY PROGRAM………………………….114 B. NCAHRN PAMPHLET ……………………………………...…………….119 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………...123 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Nicaraguan Health Statistics from 1977 to 1984……………………………………...27 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Evolution of El Salvador’s Health Infrastructure……………………………………..35 2. Share of El Salvador’s Health Budget Allocation………………………………….…38 viii ABBREVIATIONS AMES – Asociación de Mujeres de El Salvador (Association of Women of El Salvador) AMNLAE – Asociación de Mujeres Nicaragüenses ‘Luisa Armanda Espinoza’ (Association of Nicaraguan Women Luisa Armanda Espinoza) CHRICA – The Committee for Health Rights in Central America CISAS – Centro de Información y Servicios de Asesoría en Salud (Center for Information and Advisory Services in Health in Nicaragua) CISPES – The Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador CODIPSA – Comisión Diocesana de la Pastoral en Salud de Chalatenango (Diocesan Health Commission of Chalatenango Province) FMLN – Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front) FSLN – Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (Sandinista National Liberation Front) IMF – International Monetary Fund MCAF – Medicines for Central America Fund MINSA – Ministerio de Salud de la República de Nicaragua (Sandinista Ministry of Health, Nicaragua) NCAHRN – National Central America Health Rights Network STISSS – Sindicato de Trabajadores del Instituto Salvadoreño del Seguro Social (Union of Salvadoran Social Security Institute Workers) USAID – United States Agency for International Development WP – Witness for Peace ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION “I understand health care as a window through which one can discover more concretely the multiple layers, old and new, of a society in the revolutionary-controlled zones, forming itself through numerous trials and errors.”1 –Francisco Metzi Italian doctor Francisco Metzi first travelled to El Salvador in 1983. After spending three years in the guerilla-controlled territories of the country, he documented his experiences in an attempt “to describe the immense difficulties and the exhilarating successes, the bitter disappointments and the real growth processes” of the Salvadoran people.2 Metzi, like so many others who travelled Central America in the 1980s, stood in solidarity with the people and against the United States, by offering his medical expertise. U.S. nurse Susan Classen, too, spent time in El Salvador in the 1980s. Moved by the physical and mental trauma of El Salvador’s poor, she helped treat patients and train health workers at the community level. Others spent time in Nicaragua, where they helped train and disseminate the new health programs of the Sandinista government, and where many helped in the war zones of that country as well. Each person who dedicated their life to aiding the Nicaraguan and Salvadoran people put themselves at risk; this was especially so for those who spent time in war zones and dared to engage in medical practice. 1 Francisco Metzi, The People’s Remedy: The Struggle for Health Care in El Salvador’s War of Liberation, trans. Jean Carroll (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1988 Medical Aid for El Salvador), 2-3. 2 Ibid., 1. Despite the international laws regarding medical neutrality in war zones,3 the practice of targeting healthcare workers and facilities seems ubiquitous in conflict. This fact remains as true in today’s conflicts as it was in the Central American conflicts of the late twentieth century.4 Despite the dangers, solidarity workers, alongside the incredible volunteers of Central America, worked to provide healthcare services to the civilians most deeply impacted. Both countries went through major civil conflict in the 1980s, which manifested in violence against civilian populations, displacement within the region and abroad,
Recommended publications
  • Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, and Ugandacsome Attracting Intervention from Neighboring Countries
    Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? The year saw no seismic shifts for the better for human rights prospects in the continent. But in a relative sense the backdrop improved, thanks principally to the switch from military to civilian rule in Nigeria, and the successful second democratic elections in South Africa. Not surprisingly, the gloom elsewhere in the continent obscured these and a few other positive developments. But in a difficult environment, the changes, especially in Nigeria, which had been on the critical list for so long, gave some comfort. With their governments committed to human rights promotion and working jointly, Nigeria and South AfricaCwhose economic and military power by far outranked any other country in AfricaCcould provide the region with a more coherent vision of the future and a creative surge of political, economic, and cultural activity. Nigeria Back in the Thick of Things Fingers crossed, Nigeria went to the polls between December 1998 and February 1999. Few leaders had to preside over such a critical juncture of a nation=s history as President Olusegun Obasanjo when he was inaugurated as president on May 29. After being sworn into office, President Obasanjo=s first actions included sacking over 150 military officers, ordering a review of all the contracts that his predecessor signed during the year, and setting up an inquiry into human rights abuses. Even some of the fiercest critics of the governments who argued that it had yet to make lasting changes, acknowledged that there was greater individual freedom. At the international level, Nigeria regained credibility in international circles and found a new self-assurance after years of isolation as a pariah state.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Neutrality
    1�8 Media – Medical Neutrality Chouliaraki, L. (2006) The Spectatorship of Suffering. Sage Publications. Powers, M. (2014) The Structural Organization of ngo Publicity Work: Explaining Divergent Publicity Strategies at Humanitarian and Human Rights Organizations. International Journal of Communication, 8: 90–107. Robinson, P. (2002) The cnn Effect. The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. Routledge. Singer, P. (1972) Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3): 229–243. Medical Neutrality Medical neutrality refers to the principle of non-interference with medical ser- vices during conflicts and other humanitarian crises. The concept of medical neutrality is grounded in statutes in international humanitarian law (ihl) and international human rights law, and is informed by ethical codes such as the Hippocratic Oath (Bouchet-Saulnier et al. 2013; Roberts and VanRooyen 2013). It requires three things: (1) the protection of and non-interference with the operations of medical facilities, medical transport, and medical personnel; (2) the provision of the best medical care possible to all who need medical atten- tion, combatants and non-combatants alike, regardless of their political affili- ation or participation in conflicts and politics; and most generally, (3) the man- date that warring factions both protect and refrain from targeting civilians during conflicts. Numerous non-governmental aid and human rights organiza- tions, United Nations agencies, and state signatories to international laws and treaties support and variably enact the principle of medical neutrality. For ex- ample, alongside the International Committee of the Red Cross (icrc), Physi- cians for Human Rights has led many initiatives to define and enforce medical neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Preventing Attacks on Health Facilities During Armed Conflict in Syria
    Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article PERSPECTIVES Understanding and Preventing Attacks on Health Facilities During Armed Conflict in Syria This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Abdulaziz Omar Background: Despite healthcare facilities being deemed untouchable in times of conflict, the war in Syria has seen its government as well as opposition forces, target their people and Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK infrastructure as a strategy of war. Violations of medical neutrality and International Humanitarian Law has led to the loss of countless medical personnel, civilians and health care facilities; setting the country back to health levels last seen thirty years ago. It is evident through the strategy of the Syrian and Russian government that healthcare facilities are being deliberately targeted with humanitarian organisations condemning all parties involved for violating the Geneva Conventions. The report examines the impact of the conflict in Syria on its health facilities and looks at the reasons why these services are under attack and the international response to the conflict. The report concludes by looking into plans currently implemented to protect our healthcare infrastructure during times of war whilst comparing it to past strategies. For personal use only. Methods: A literature review was conducted for the study with information and data collected through several search engines including Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and searches through Google. The keywords mapped to find relevant literature includes “Syria”, “healthcare”, “health care worker”, “humanitarian aid”, and “volunteer”, “International Humanitarian Law”, “Geneva Convention”.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Ethics in Peacetime and Wartime: the Case for a Better Understanding
    International Review of the Red Cross (2013), 95 (889), 189–213. Violence against health care doi:10.1017/S1816383113000775 Medical ethics in peacetime and wartime: the case for a better understanding Vivienne Nathanson Vivienne Nathanson qualified in medicine at the University of London in 1978. She is Director of Professional Activities at the British Medical Association, and is responsible for public health, human rights, medical ethics, international affairs, medical education, and many other areas. She writes and lectures extensively on ethics, human rights, and public health, contributing chapters to books and e-learning resources on the same areas. She is currently an honorary Professor in the School for Health at the University of Durham. She was recently called as an expert witness to the public enquiry into the death in UK custody of Baha Mousa, and to the public enquiry into the use of contaminated blood products in Scotland (the Penrose Enquiry). Abstract Health-care workers face ethical dilemmas in their decision-making in every clinical intervention they make. In times of armed conflict the decisions may be different, and the circumstances can combine to raise ethical tensions. This article looks at the tensions in peacetime and in times of armed conflict and examines the types of cases that doctors and other health-care workers will face. It also discusses the common ethical decision-making framework and the role of communication within both clinical care and ethical analysis. © icrc 2014 189 V. Nathanson Keywords: ethical dilemma, ethical analysis, decision making, consent, confidentiality, communication, trust. Health-care workers worldwide follow the same ethical codes and principles, developed to protect patients from abuse and to make clear the limits that those professionals will apply to their decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand up for Medical Neutrality in War Zones, International Community Urged 22 November 2016
    Stand up for medical neutrality in war zones, international community urged 22 November 2016 The international community needs to stand up for have lost their lives. medical neutrality in war zones, and mandate the UN Security Council to act in the face of persistent The impact of these attacks is "enormous," say the and blatant breaches of the Geneva Convention, authors, outlining the psychological trauma for the urge global health experts in an editorial in the survivors and the erosion of preventive healthcare, online journal BMJ Global Health. such as vaccinations and infectious disease control . Some 196 countries ratified the International Humanitarian Law, which specifically promotes "The [International Humanitarian Law] is explicit medical neutrality and protection of medical and provides for the protection of patients, health services for people in war zones, as set out in the facilities, health personnel and patients in times of four Geneva Conventions of 1949.Breaches of the war as long as they are not directly involved in law, which was modified in 1977 and 2005 to hostilities," they write. strengthen it further, are regarded as war crimes, because of their impact on civilians and medical "The international community needs to rise to the staff who have a duty of care to those wounded in occasion and match action with words by war-torn countries. mandating the United Nations Security Council to provide protection for health facilities in war zones "But over the years, war crimes have persisted and enter into dialogue with government and with little or no definitive action by the international warring groups to respect the principles of medical community to stem the tide," insist the authors, Drs neutrality in conflict areas," they urge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Practice Medicine Without Repercussions: Ethical Issues in Times of Political Strife Leith Hathout
    Hathout Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2012, 7:11 http://www.peh-med.com/content/7/1/11 COMMENTARY Open Access The right to practice medicine without repercussions: ethical issues in times of political strife Leith Hathout Abstract This commentary examines the incursion on the neutrality of medical personnel now taking place as part of the human rights crises in Bahrain and Syria, and the ethical dilemmas which these incursions place not only in front of physicians practicing in those nations, but in front of the international community as a whole. In Bahrain, physicians have recently received harsh prison terms, apparently for treating demonstrators who clashed with government forces. In Syria, physicians are under the same political pressure to avoid treating political demonstrators or to act as informants against their own patients, turning them in to government authorities. This pressure has been severe, to the point that some physicians have become complicit in the abuse of patients who were also political demonstrators. This paper posits that physicians in certain countries in the Middle East during the “Arab Spring,” specifically Syria and Bahrain, are being used as both political pawns and political weapons in clear violation of Geneva Convention and World Medical Association guidelines, and that this puts them into the most extreme sort of “dual loyalty” dilemma. They are being forced to choose between their own safety and well-being and that of their patients – a negative sum scenario wherein there is no optimal choice. As such, an international call for a United Nations inquiry must be made in order to protect the neutrality of medical care and personnel during times of armed conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Neutrality and the Right to Health
    Through evidence, Physicians for Human Rights change is possible. 256 West 38th Street 9th Floor New York, NY 10018 +1.646.564.3720 phr.org Medical Neutrality and the Right to Health Effective protections for health care workers under international human rights law Medical neutrality requires: 1. the protection of medical personnel, patients, facilities, and transport from attack or interference; 2. unhindered access to medical care and treatment; and 3. nondiscriminatory treatment of the sick and injured.1 The principles of medical neutrality and medical ethics remain unchanged during times of conflict, civil unrest, or state emergencies. Under international human rights law, states are obligated to ensure effective protection for health care workers at all times, and to provide unencumbered access to emergency health care for all. These obligations remain in force regardless of any context of conflict, civil unrest, emergency, or alleged criminal activity. Interference by a third party, including punishment or harassment of health care professionals for providing medical treatment in accordance with international medical ethics, is prohibited by international law. This is also known as the principle of medical neutrality. Where medical neutrality is undermined or attacked, international law requires authorities to investigate. Although the principles of medical neutrality are often discussed in the context of the Geneva Conventions and the laws of war, protection of medical neutrality is also a state obligation during peacetime and situations of violence not rising to the level of an armed conflict. In situations of violence other than armed conflict, international human rights law applies and provides the foundation for the protection of health care, and those who provide it, at all times through the provisions on the right to life, health, and freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten in a Crisis Addressing Dementia in Humanitarian Response Forgotten in a Crisis Addressing Dementia in Humanitarian Response
    Forgotten in a Crisis Addressing Dementia in Humanitarian Response Forgotten in a Crisis Addressing Dementia in Humanitarian Response Alzheimer’s Pakistan A Forgotten in a Crisis Addressing Dementia in Humanitarian Response About the authors For this report, the Global Alzheimer’s & Dementia Action International Rescue Committee – Lilian Kiapi and Gemma Alliance, Alzheimer’s Disease International and Alzheimer’s Lyons; Inter-Agency Standing Committee – Dr Anita Marini Pakistan have worked in partnership, investigating ways (Consultant); NCD Alliance – Jessica Beagley and Katie humanitarian emergency responses can protect and support Cooper (consultant); Geneva NGO Committee on Ageing – people living with dementia. Silvia Perel-Levin; Puerto Rico House of Representatives – Luis Vega Ramos; St Maarten Alzheimer Association – The Global Alzheimer’s & Dementia Action Alliance (GADAA) Dr Raymond Jessurun; The Guardian – Amanda Holpuch; is an international network of civil society organisations Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology – Dr Shuichi championing global action on dementia. The GADAA network Awata; United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – connects a broad spectrum of INGOs including international Vincent Kahi and Peter Ventevogel; University of California – development organisations, gender-equality groups, health- Dr Tala Al-Rousan; World Health Organization – Dr Katrin focused NGOs and disability rights champions. Demonstrating Seeher and Dr Fahmy Hanna; United Kingdom Department how dementia intersects other civil society agendas such as of Health and Social Care – Dilbinder Dhillon; World development, human rights, disability, older people, women, Hospice and Palliative Care Alliance – Stephen Connor. health, and humanitarian. Alzheimer’s Society, Alzheimer’s Disease International, Age International and Dementia Views expressed in this report are not necessarily those Alliance International form the GADAA Steering Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief Civilians Under Fire
    Policy Brief February 2016 Civilians Under Fire Restore Respect for International Humanitarian Law Executive Summary The scale and severity of human suffering in current armed conflicts represent a distressing race to the bottom in disregard for the basic rules regulating armed conflict. Civilian deaths and injuries resulting from explosive weapons have increased by 52% over the last four years.1 The world is currently witnessing the greatest population displacement since World War II.2 This is not merely the tragic, inevitable consequence of conflict, and it cannot be excused by the fog of war. Much of this loss of life and human suffering is avoidable. This is precisely what international humanitarian law, also known as the law of armed conflict, is for – to limit the effects of armed conflict. There is ample evidence that basic rules are being violated on a daily basis by both non-state armed groups and state parties to conflict, even by those with the most advanced equipment and training. Parties to conflict deliberately target civilians as well as their homes, hospitals, schools, and other infrastructure; use indiscriminate force in populated areas; and fail to take precautions in the conduct of hostilities. This is most acutely evident in Syria and Yemen where much of the harm visited upon civilians is foreseeable and preventable. The lack of investigation and public accounting by the parties to conflict of the impact of their military operations on civilians speaks to the permissiveness of the current climate. Civilians cannot afford such indifference to the basic rules intended to protect them during armed conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and International Responses to Attacks on Healthcare in Conflict Zones
    L O C A L A N D I NTERNATIONAL R ESPONSES TO A T T A C K S O N H EALTHCARE IN C O N F L I C T Z ONES A CASE STUDY OF SYRI A Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy Capstone Project Submitted by: Karen Taylor Advisor: Professor Elizabeth Stites July 21, 2018 Acknowledgements This paper is dedicated to the doctors, nurses and aid workers working in conflict zones who risk their lives every day to help others. You have shown us the true meaning of sacrifice. Without your dedicated service, healthcare for civilians in Syria would cease to exist. Many thanks to my advisor, Dr. Elizabeth Stites, for her timely and thoughtful guidance throughout the process. Thank you to Dr. Jennifer Leaning, Dr. Alex De Waal, Dr. Kimberly Howe and Dr. Stephanie Kayden for providing key suggestions that shaped the flow of this paper, and for helping me locate resources and participants to interview. Thank you to my husband and my parents for their constant support and encouragement. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 5 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Global Prevalence of the Issue ............................................................................................................ 5 Categorization
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Ngos & Host Governments
    Issue RPN 19 Refugee Participation Network May 1995 NGOs & host governments Who's overstepping the mark? Includes articles on: • NGO legislation (Croatia, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda & Sri Lanka) • NGO Code of Conduct • Sub-contracting of humani• tarian relief • Enhancing the capacity of local NGOs • Resettling the displaced and reports on: • Hong Kong's Vietnamese refugee camps • Asylum-seekers in Japan • Self-help on the Burma border • RSP research Spanish translation of RPN - see page 3 Published by the Refugee Studies Programme, Oxford, UK No copyright: You may freely reproduce the contents of the RPN but please acknowledge the source. , RPN ^ Contents ISSN 0965-7460 From the Editor 3 RPN Articles Refugee Studies Programme, Queen Elizabeth House, 21 St Giles, Regulating the non-governmental sector : the dilemma ^ Oxford 0X1 3LA, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1865 270730 by Eddie Adiin-Yaansah & Barbara Harrell-Bond Fax: +44 (0)1865 270721 E-mail: [email protected] Legislation in Croatia : a letter from Zagreb 10 NGO legislation: the Sri Lanka case 12 Editor by Koen Van Brabant Marion Couldrey The NGO Code of Conduct: NGO obligations towards governments [plus text of Code] 16 Published three times a year by by Jon Bennett Refugee Studies Programme University of Oxford The role of voluntary agencies in development: a recipient's perspective 20 The RPN aims to provide a forum for by Richard Laing the regular exchange of practical experience, information and ideas NGOs and the sub-contracting of humanitarian relief 22 between researchers, refugees and by Mark Dujfield people who work with refugees. Enhancing the capacity of local NGOs in refugee Material and information contained in assistance : experience from Malawi and Zimbabwe 26 this publication are the opinions of the by Roger Zetter authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or the Refugee Resettling the displaced : development affected people Studies Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Responsibility for Protection of Medical Workers and Facilities in Armed Confl Ict
    Health Policy Responsibility for protection of medical workers and facilities in armed confl ict Leonard S Rubenstein, Melanie D Bittle Assaults on patients and medical personnel, facilities, and transports, denial of access to medical services, and misuse Lancet 2010; 375: 329–40 of medical facilities and emblems have become a feature of armed confl ict despite their prohibition by the laws of See Editorial page 253 war. Strategies to improve compliance with these laws, protection, and accountability are lacking, and regular Johns Hopkins Bloomberg reporting of violations is absent. A systematic review of the frequency of reporting and types of violations has not School of Public Health, been done for more than 15 years. To gain a better understanding of the scope and extent of the problem, we used John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA uniform search criteria to review three global sources of human rights reports in armed confl icts for 2003–08, and (L S Rubenstein LLM); in-depth reports on violations committed in armed confl ict during 1989–2008. Findings from this review showed and US Institute of Peace, defi ciencies in the extent and methods of reporting, but also identifi ed three major trends in such assaults: attacks on Washington, DC, USA medical functions seem to be part of a broad assault on civilians; assaults on medical functions are used to achieve a (M D Bittle BBA) military advantage; and combatants do not respect the ethical duty of health professionals to provide care to patients Correspondence to: Leonard S Rubenstein, irrespective of affi liation. WHO needs to lead robust and systematic documentation of these violations, and countries Johns Hopkins Bloomberg and the medical community need to take steps to improve compliance, protection, and accountability.
    [Show full text]