Great Crested Newt Survey Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Crested Newt Survey Report WHISTLEY BRIDGE GREAT CRESTED NEWT MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for Mr and Mrs Gill by Hankinson Duckett Associates HDA ref: 952.1 November 2020 hankinson duckett associates t 01491 838175 f 01491 838997 e [email protected] w www.hda-enviro.co.uk The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Waterbody descriptions 3 3 Evaluation 4 4 Mitigation and Site Safeguarding 5 5 Conclusion 9 6 References 10 HDA Document Control and Quality Assurance Record APPENDICES A Location of waterbodies within vicinity of site 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site location and summary description 1.1.1 This document provides a reasonable ‘worst case scenario’ Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy in support of a planning application for the proposed development of approximately 1.1ha of land at Whistley Bridge, Whistley Green, Reading, hereinafter referred to as ‘the site’. The site centre is located by National Grid Reference SU 787 745. The study was commissioned by Mr and Mrs Gill in November 2020. 1.1.2 The site is located south of the town of Twyford and is bordered by a gravel pit to the south and west and Whistley Mill Lane with agricultural fields beyond to the north and east. The property itself is located off Whistley Mill Lane and comprises a residential house, lodge, associated outbuildings and garden. The wider area generally comprises residential development, grassland fields, gravel pits and areas of woodland. The location and boundary of the site are shown in Appendix A. A more detailed description of the habitats within the site and its surrounds is given in the Ecological Appraisal (HDA, 2020). 1.2 Background and legislative context 1.2.1 Five species of amphibian are widespread in England; the Common Frog Rana temporaria, Common Toad Bufo bufo, Smooth Newt Lissotriton vulgaris, Palmate Newt Lissotriton helveticus and Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus. A sixth species of amphibian, the Natterjack Toad Bufo calamita, also occurs in England but this species has special habitat requirements that limit its range to certain sand dune and heathland sites. 1.2.2 Amphibians require aquatic habitat within which to breed and suitable terrestrial habitat to forage and hibernate. Suitable breeding waterbodies are usually well vegetated with still, shallow water that is not heavily shaded or very exposed. Terrestrial habitat includes woodland, scrub, field edges and gardens. Hibernation can occur under stone or log piles, in crevices or leaf litter and under the soil. Occasionally amphibians may be found hibernating in their breeding pools. 1.2.3 Over the last few decades all amphibians have suffered a decline in numbers. This is due to a combination of many factors, which include habitat destruction and fragmentation, loss of breeding pools through unsympathetic management and neglect, introduction of fish (which eat amphibian larvae) and pollution. 1.2.4 The Great Crested Newt is protected under the 2017 Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations. In relation to European Protected Species (EPS), the 2017 Regulations make it an offence to: • Deliberately capture, injure or kill any wild animal of an EPS; Whistley Bridge/Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy/952.1/CB/November 2020 1 • Deliberately disturb wild animals of any such species, in particular any disturbance which is likely to: (i) impair their ability to survive, to breed or reproduce, or to rear or nurture their young; or to hibernate or migrate; (ii) affect significantly the local distribution or abundance of the species to which they belong; • Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of such an animal; and/or • To (a) be in possession of, or to control; (b) to transport any live or dead animal or any part of an animal; (c) to sell or exchange or (d) offer for sale or exchange any live or dead animal or part of an animal of an EPS. 1.2.5 In addition, Great Crested Newts are protected under the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act (as amended). The Great Crested Newt is listed on Schedule 5 of the Act and is subject to the provisions of Sections 9.4b and 9.4c, which make it an offence to: • Intentionally or recklessly disturb a Great Crested Newt while it is occupying a structure or place which it uses for shelter or protection; and/or • Intentionally or recklessly obstruct access to any structure or place used for shelter or protection by a Great Crested Newt. 1.2.6 Where works are planned that may result in an offence under the current legislation then works should be carried out under an appropriate licence from Natural England. 1.2.7 The Great Crested Newt, Natterjack Toad and Common Toad are also listed as priority species for conservation action under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and are listed as Species of Principal Importance under Section 41 of the 2006 Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act. Section 40 of the NERC Act requires that these species are a material consideration in the planning process. 1.3 Development proposals 1.3.1 Development proposals for the site include construction of a replacement residential dwelling and associated garden and infrastructure (Boyer, 2020). 1.4 Scope and purpose of the report 1.4.1 The Ecological Appraisal (HDA, 2020) identified no standing water within the site with potential to support breeding Great Crested Newts. However, a review of mapping and satellite imagery from the surrounding area indicated the presence of waterbodies within 250m of the site. Although many of these waterbodies are likely to be sub-optimal for breeding Great Crested Newts, comprising either flowing rivers/streams or larger waterbodies likely to support predatory fish, it was subsequently considered possible that Great Crested Newts could use the site during terrestrial phases. 1.4.2 Due to the timing of the instruction of the Great Crested Newt surveys in November 2020, it was not possible to carry out Great Crested Newt survey work within the March–June breeding season in support of the current application. In view of the above, and in advance of the proposed Great Crested Newt surveys between mid-April to June 2021, Section 4 Whistley Bridge/Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy/952.1/CB/November 2020 2 provides a precautionary approach to mitigation sufficient to demonstrate that the development proposals are able to mitigate effects on a large Great Crested Newt population associated with local waterbodies, including the gravel pit (Waterbody 1) immediately adjacent to the site, should such a population be identified during the 2021 survey. 2 WATERBODY DESCRIPTIONS 2.1 Five waterbodies with potential to support Great Crested Newts were identified within 250m of the site boundary during the desk study. The locations of the waterbodies are shown in Appendix A. • Waterbody 1 comprises a gravel pit located immediately adjacent to the southern and western site boundaries. The waterbody has a gravel base with shallow earth banks. The gravel pit supports marginal and aquatic species including Elodea densa, Bulrush, Yellow Flag Iris, Pendulous Sedge, Canary Grass, Teasel and Common Fleabane. The gravel pit is bordered by trees and supports a couple of tree covered islands which result in shading of approximately 80% of the perimeter of the waterbody. The water quality was assessed as moderate and it is assumed that the waterbody never dries. Features in the wider area include Whistley Mill Lane and the site to the north and east, and grassland fields and woodland to the south and west. • Waterbody 2 comprises a medium-sized pond located approximately 85m to the north of the site, and approximately 7m to the east of Waterbody 3. The waterbody is bordered by scattered trees and grassland habitats. Features in the wider area include Whistley Mill Lane to the south, Waterbody 3 to the north and west and Waterbody 6 to the east. • Waterbody 3 comprises a gravel pit located approximately 85m to the north of the site, and approximately 7m to the west of Waterbody 2. The waterbody is bordered by scattered trees and grassland habitats. Features in the wider area include Whistley Mill Lane and Waterbody 4 to the south, Copperbridge Brook and woodland to the west, a gravel pit to the north and Waterbodies 2 and 6 to the east. • Waterbody 4 comprises a medium-sized pond located approximately 190m to the north-west of the site, and approximately 8m to the south of Waterbody 3. The waterbody is bordered by grassland habitats. Features in the wider area include Whistley Mill Lane to the south, Copperbridge Brook and woodland to the west and Waterbody 3 to the north. • Waterbody 5 comprise a ditch located (at its closest point) approximately 70m to the north-east of the site. The waterbody is bordered by grassland and woodland habitats. Features in the wider area include Whistley Mill Lane to the south, Waterbodies 2 and 3 to the west, and Waterbody 6 and woodland to the east. Whistley Bridge/Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy/952.1/CB/November 2020 3 2.2 One further waterbody (Waterbody 6) is located within 250m of the site boundary. Waterbody 6 however comprises the River Loddon which due to its fast-flowing nature is unsuitable for breeding Great Crested Newts and likely to form a partial barrier to newt migration and dispersal. 3 EVALUATION 3.1 There are no waterbodies within the site that could provide suitable breeding habitat for Great Crested Newts and this species is therefore not expected to breed at the site.
Recommended publications
  • Doc-5.2-ES-ENC-App-5.7-Great-Crested-Newt-Report.Pdf, 1.35 MB
    Roxhill (Junction 15) Ltd Northampton Gateway, Northampton GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY REPORT May 2018 Great-Crested Newt Report fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved / Date - Draft 1 SJN / 03.01.18 RJS / 15.01.18 A PH / 11.05.18 PH / 11.05.18 J:\5700\5772\ECO\GCN\2017\GCN Report\5772 App 5.7 GCN Report.Docx 1 Great-Crested Newt Report fpcr CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 LEGISLATION ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 6 4.0 RESULTS & ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 10 5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION STRATEGY ....................................................... 18 TABLES Table 1: HSI Scores
    [Show full text]
  • Great Crested Newt Survey of Catsfield Cep School, East Sussex
    GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY OF CATSFIELD C.E.P SCHOOL, EAST SUSSEX (TQ 728 135) ON BEHALF OF MACKELLAR SCHWERDT ARCHITECTS JUNE 2009 BARRY KEMP CONSERVATION LIMITED ‘Amblehurst’ Nevill Road Crowborough East Sussex TN6 2RA (t) 01892 663942 (f) 01892 613341 (m) 07780 665177 (e) [email protected] Barry Kemp Conservation Ltd – Catsfield CEP School report : June 2009 1 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Legal Protection of reptiles & amphibians 3.0 Location of site 4.0 Existing records 5.0 Habitat 6.0 Great crested newt survey 7.0 Results 8.0 Survey constraints 9.0 Interpreting the results 10.0 Assessment of risk to GCN by the proposed development 11.0 Interpreting the legislation 12.0 Risk avoidance measures 13.0 Conclusions 14.0 Recommendations 15.0 References Appendix Barry Kemp Conservation Ltd – Catsfield CEP School report : June 2009 2 1.0 Introduction This report was commissioned by MACKELLAR SCHWERDT ARCHITECTS to establish the presence or absence of Great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) within the school pond and to help inform any possible mitigation measures prior to a planning application to East Sussex County Council to construct a new pre school building. 2.0 Legal Protection of reptiles & amphibians The Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 protects Grass snake (Natrix natrix), Adder (Vipera berus) Slow-worm (Anguis fragilis) and Common lizard (Zootoca vivipara) against deliberate killing and injuring (subsection 9.1) In addition the Sand lizard (Lacerta agilis), Smooth snake (Coronella austriaca), Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) and Great crested newt receive full protection under the Act and are also protected under the Conservation Regulations of 1994 (Natural Habitats) .
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT CRESTED NEWT MITIGATION SCHEME: Laneside Quarry, Kirkheaton, Huddersfield
    GREAT CRESTED NEWT MITIGATION SCHEME: Laneside Quarry, Kirkheaton, Huddersfield Introduction Laneside Quarry is a large (22.5 hectares) shale and sandstone quarry on the eastern side of Kirkheaton, West Yorkshire. Quarrying and brickwork operations ceased at the site in the 1990s and permission has since been obtained by The Casey Group to use for the site for landfill. In 2002, Great Crested Newts (Triturus cristatus) were detected in two large ponds and several smaller pools on the bed of the quarry. The Great Crested Newt receives full protection under European and UK wildlife legislation. Description and Status of Great Crested Newts The Great Crested Newt is the UK’s largest newt and can reach a length of up to 170mm. Great Crested Newts can be distinguished from the other two British species of newts by their size (Great Crested Newts are larger and much darker than other species). In the breeding season the male Great Crested Newts have a jagged crest along their back which is separated from a smoother crest along the tail. Adult male Great Crested Newt Great Crested Newts have suffered and major decline in Britain over the last century this is thought to be as a result of the loss of natural breeding sites (marl pit ponds), drainage of wetlands, silting up of ponds, fragmentation of habitats as a result of development and the loss of habitats such as grasslands and woodlands used by newts for hibernation and shelter. Local and national surveys have estimated rates of colony loss in England at between 0.5% and 4% a year during the 1960’s to 1990’s; this is equivalent to the loss of 40,000 breeding ponds in 30 years (English Nature 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Egg-Strip Surveying for Detection of Pond-Breeding Newts: Does Egg-Strip Substrate Matter?
    SALAMANDRA 53(4) 494–500 30 OctoberOlivia 2017 CharltonISSN &0036–3375 Todd Lewis Artificial egg-strip surveying for detection of pond-breeding newts: Does egg-strip substrate matter? Olivia Charlton1 & Todd R. Lewis2 1) 29 Park Stenak, Carharrack, Redruth, TR16 5SL, UK 2) Westfield, 4 Worgret Road, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 4PJ, UK Corresponding author: Olivia Charlton, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 7 December 2016 Accepted: 6 March 2017 by Alexander Kupfer Abstract. Survey methods for detecting newts (Salamandridae: Pleurodelinae) in ponds by identifying presence of eggs laid during their aquatic breeding condition are useful and often deployed across various population surveillance activi- ties. Egg-strip surveying is an effective way of detecting newt presence in a pond by providing an egg-laying medium for newts that can be selectively inspected by a surveyor. In this study we deployed a series of different plastic substrates to investigate substrate laying preference by three species of newts; Lissotriton helveticus, L. vulgaris and Triturus cristatus. Our results revealed that L. helveticus and L. vulgaris significantly preferred green and longer varieties of black egg-strip substrate over a thicker less pliable plastic substrate. Contrastingly T. cristatus exhibited no significant preference between substrates. Results from this study indicate that if surveyors choose to use black long, black short, black, green, yellow, or red coloured substrates, or thicker black plastic substrates for egg-strip surveys, detection for T. cristatus remains constant but with improved detection and mild preference on more pliable plastic substrates. However, for L. vulgaris and L. helveti­ cus the thicker gauge black egg-strips may significantly reduce the effectiveness of detection and are discriminated against compared to more pliable grades of green and longer varieties of black plastic substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Crested Newt Survey Report
    Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.1 Environmental Statement Document 6.9.3 DOCUMENT 6.9.5 Great Crested Newt Survey Report The Yorkshire and Humber (CCS Cross Country Pipeline) Development Consent Order Under Regulation 5(2)(a) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Application Reference: EN070001 June 2014 The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.i Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE ONSHORE SCHEME 1 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 1.4 SURVEY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 4 2 Legislation and Policy 5 2.1 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 5 2.2 PLANNING POLICY 6 2.3 UK POST-2010 BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK 6 2.4 LOCAL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (LBAP) 7 3 Methodology 8 3.1 CONSULTATION WITH NATURAL ENGLAND 8 3.2 DESK BASED STUDY 8 3.3 FIELD SURVEY 10 3.4 POPULATION SIZE CLASS ASSESSMENT 13 3.5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 14 3.6 SURVEY LIMITATIONS 16 3.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE 17 4 Results 18 4.1 CONSULTATION WITH NATURAL ENGLAND 18 4.2 DESK BASED STUDY 18 4.3 FIELD SURVEY 20 5 Evaluation 35 6 References 41 Figures and Appendices 42 Appendix A: Natural England Consultation 43 Appendix B: Habitat Suitability Index Assessment Results 44 The Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline Environmental Statement Volume 6: Ch.9 Ecology and Nature Conservation p.ii Environmental Statement Document 6.9.5 Appendix C: Detailed Survey Results – All Ponds 2012/2013
    [Show full text]
  • Elite Ecology
    Elite Ecology Passionate about Ecology Ford Mill Farm, Ford Great Crested New t Survey Report July 2020 www.eliteecology.co.uk www.facebook.com/eliteecology www.twitter.com/eliteecology Welle1 sley House, Wellesley Street, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST1 4NF Ford Mill Farm, Ford Elite Ecology Great Crested Newt Survey Document Control Document Properties Organisation Elite Ecology Prepared For Mr. and Mrs. Brough Author Mr. Matthew Cotterill Approved (1st Checker) Mr. Marek Fraczek Approved (2nd Checker) Mr. Richard Millington Title Ford Mill Farm, Ford Great Crested Newt Survey Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 24/07/2020 V1 Draft First Draft 29/07/2020 V1 Final Report Proof Read 1 Ford Mill Farm, Ford Elite Ecology Great Crested Newt Survey 0. Executive Summary This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. Nick and Mrs. Sarah Brooke. It relates to the proposed development works located at Ford Mill Farm, Martinslow Lane, Ford, Staffordshire, ST13 7RW (Central OS Grid Reference: SK 06802 53414). To fulfil this brief, Elite Ecology was provided with a desktop study from a previous report completed by Absolute Ecology and carried out their own field surveys. The current proposals are for the existing buildings to be converted for residential purposes. The HSI water body suitability for the surveyed water features were as follows: ➢ Pond (P1) = 0.62 = Average Suitability. Based on the information gathered during the multiple survey visits and the presence of a great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) breeding pond, a medium population of great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) can be confirmed within P1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glasgow Naturalist V27 Supplement
    The Glasgow Naturalist Volume 27 Supplement 2019 Edited by: Christopher. J. McInerny & Iain Wilkie Contents EDITORIAL The conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Scotland – the role of publishing. C.J. McInerny………….1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE Programme: The Amphibians and Reptiles of Scotland: current research and future challenges…….............3 Conference: The Amphibians and Reptiles of Scotland: current research and future challenges. J.R. Downie………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………7 Towards an evidence-based approach for road mitigation schemes for amphibians and reptiles in the U.K. - a review. S.O. Petrovan…………………………………………………………………………………………………...9 The secret life of the adder (Vipera berus) revealed through telemetry. N. Hand……………………………….13 Great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) populations are not one and the same: Scottish newts respond differently to Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) and abiotic factors. L.R. Harper, J.R. Downie & D.C. McNeill………………………………………………………………………………………..................................................19 SuDS and amphibians - are constructed wetlands really benefitting nature and people? D. O’Brien, J. Hall, A. Miró, M. Rae & R. Jehle…………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Mitigating the effects of a road on amphibian migrations: a Scottish case study of road tunnels. I.D.C. Hill, C.A. Rossi, S.O. Petrovan, M. Hartup, F. Clarke & J.R. Downie………………………...................25 Long-term monitoring for adders: an evolving methodology. R.J. Hodges & C. Seabrook…………………...37 Scottish Dragon Finder evaluation. V. Larcombe & J. Stead……………………………………......................................45 Linking water quality with amphibian breeding and development: a case study comparing natural ponds and Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in East Kilbride, Scotland. R.J. Bird, E. Paterson, J.R. Downie & B.K. Mable……………………………………………………………………………………………………….49 The study and conservation of adders in Scotland. C.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Farm Golf Course - Essington
    “Providing Common-sense Solutions for Sustainable Development” Paul Keeling, Park Hall Farm, Brookhouse Road, Cheadle, Staffordshire Moorlands, ST10 2NJ, 07838 377 612, [email protected], www.evolutionecology.co.uk Wood Farm Golf Course - Essington Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy Report March 2016 – Version 2 Wood Farm Golf Course Evolution Ecology Ltd Great Crested Newt Mitigation Report Great Crested Newt Mitigation Strategy For Wood Farm Golf Course, Essington 2 Wood Farm Golf Course Evolution Ecology Ltd Great Crested Newt Mitigation Report 0 Executive Summary The following mitigation/compensation measures method statement, details the proposed measures, which will be implemented in order to safeguard the population of Great Crested Newts (GCN) at Wood Farm Golf Course, Essington. This report was created by Evolution Ecology Ltd following the results of the GCN presence/absence pond surveys undertaken by Pearce Environment Ltd in Spring 2015. The proposed development site (Phase 2) occupies a total area of approximately 35.5 ha, and it consists of seven pastoral (semi-improved grassland) fields vegetated with common grasses such as cock’s foot (Dactylis glomerata), perennial rye grass (Lolium perenne), wall barley (Hordeum murinum) and crested dogs tail (Cynosurus cristatus). The boundaries of the land of interest at Wood Farm Golf Course are isolated from other land patches/roads by species-poor hedgerows and vegetated drainage ditches. The hedgerows are dominated largely by hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna), with sections of hazel (Corylus avellana), pedunculate oak (Quercus robur), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) forming useful connective features. An area of woodland extends along the northern boundary of the site; with a small appendage of this woodland extending south approximately halfway along its extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Wold Ecology Ltd
    WOLD ECOLOGY LTD. Chris Toohie Richard Baines 2 Redwood Gardens, Driffield, 5 Coastguard Cottages, Flamborough, East Riding of Yorkshire. YO25 6XA East Riding of Yorkshire. YO15 1AW 01377 200242 01262 850937 www.woldecology.co.uk Land west of Bishop’s Close, Cawood Great Crested Newt Assessment Staff Member Position Surveyor. Chris Toohie M Sc., MCIEEM Ecologist. Report prepared by. Chris Toohie M Sc., MCIEEM Ecologist. Authorised by. Chris Toohie M Sc., MCIEEM This report contains sensitive information concerning Notes. protected species and caution should be exercised when copying and distributing to third parties. Land to the west of Bishop’s Close, Great Crested Newt Assessment, May 2015 Page 1 of 28 Table of Contents. 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Survey and Site Assessment 5 3.0 Results 6 4.0 Impact Assessment 10 5.0 Mitigation 12 6.0 Method statement 14 7.0 Bibliography 21 8.0 Appendices 22 Land to the west of Bishop’s Close, Great Crested Newt Assessment, May 2015 Page 2 of 28 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 In March 2015, Wold Ecology was commissioned by Mr D. Pulleyn to undertake a great crested newt assessment on land to the west of Bishop’s Close, Cawood (national grid reference SE 56855 37514) in North Yorkshire (see Figure 1). 1.2 The habitats within the Application Site comprise improved pasture, scattered trees, remnant hedgerows, standing water (ephemeral) and amenity grassland situated adjacent to residential properties. 1.3 The proposed development involves partial site clearance and outline planning permission with all matters reserved for the erection of a residential development, creation of access road and associated public open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Crested Newt Survey Report Backbridge Farm Persimmon July 2017
    Great Crested Newt Survey Report Backbridge Farm Persimmon July 2017 23 Short Lane Long Ashton Bristol BS41 9EH www.iesconsult.co.uk 0117 9113834 07977 437567 [email protected] Integrated Ecological Solutions Ltd is a Registered Company in England and Wales No. 06941706 IES/2016/044 Backbridge Farm GCN Report Quality Assurance Job Number: IES/2016/044 Project Name: Backbridge Farm GCN Report Revision Description Originator Checked Authorised Date Number 001 Draft for TT TT June 2016 Comment 002 Final – TT TT July 2017 updated with new layout - 2 - IES/2016/044 Backbridge Farm GCN Report Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 METHODOLOGY 6 3 RESULTS 8 4 EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 5 CONCLUSIONS 16 6 REFERENCES 17 FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION 18 FIGURE 2: SURVEY AREA 20 FIGURE 3: PONDS WHERE PRESENCE/ABSENCE SURVEYS WERE CARRIED OUT 22 FIGURE 4: EDNA SURVEY LOCATIONS 24 FIGURE 5: SURVEY RESULTS 26 FIGURE 6: POPULATION SIZE CLASSES 28 APPENDIX A: NOTES AND LIMITATIONS 30 APPENDIX B: ADAS EDNA METHODOLOGY 31 - 3 - IES/2016/044 Backbridge Farm GCN Report Executive Summary IES Consulting were instructed by Persimmon Homes to undertake a great crested newt survey at land adjacent to Backbridge Farm, Malmesbury, Wiltshire. The aim of this study was to determine the use of the site, and ponds within 5oom of the site, by great crested newts. The site is heavily grazed grassland and no ponds are present within the site boundary, however it provides terrestrial habitat for great crested newts. It is proposed to build 227 residential dwellings on the site.
    [Show full text]