Policing the Police in Bosnia: a Further Reform Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policing the Police in Bosnia: a Further Reform Agenda POLICING THE POLICE IN BOSNIA: A FURTHER REFORM AGENDA 10 May 2002 Balkans Report No. 130 Sarajevo/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................i I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 A. Current Context ................................................................................................................................ 1 B. The Origins Of UNMIBH/IPTF ....................................................................................................... 4 C. The Case For Joined-Up Police Reform........................................................................................... 7 II. POLICING STRUCTURES ...........................................................................................................10 A. Fragmentation................................................................................................................................. 10 B. Non-Cooperation With The Judiciary ............................................................................................ 12 C. The State Border Service (SBS) ..................................................................................................... 16 D. Failures Of Regional Policing ........................................................................................................ 20 III. POLITICS AND POLICING ...........................................................................................................23 IV. THE POLICING GAP: LOCAL CAPABILITIES VS. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS.........26 A. Providing Security For Returnees And ‘Minorities’ ...................................................................... 26 B. War Crimes Arrests ........................................................................................................................ 28 C. The Scandal Of Human Trafficking ............................................................................................... 29 V. PROFESSIONALISING THE POLICE .......................................................................................34 A. Training .......................................................................................................................................... 34 B. IPTF Police Commissioners Project...............................................................................................34 C. Creating Indigenous Accountability: Professional Standards Units (PSUS) ................................. 37 D. ‘Minority’ Police Recruitment ....................................................................................................... 40 E. Police Academies ........................................................................................................................... 44 F. Paying The Police........................................................................................................................... 45 G. Shrinking And Reshaping The Police ............................................................................................ 47 H. Auditing The Police........................................................................................................................ 49 VI. INTERNATIONAL OVERSIGHT................................................................................................51 A. Co-Location.................................................................................................................................... 51 B. De-Authorisation And Screening ................................................................................................... 53 VII. SFOR, IPTF AND THE SECURITY GAP ...................................................................................58 VIII. CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................................60 APPENDICES A. Glossary Of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 64 B. Map Of Bosnia ............................................................................................................................... 66 C. About The International Crisis Group............................................................................................ 67 D. ICG Reports And Briefing Papers.................................................................................................. 68 E. ICG Board Members ...................................................................................................................... 72 ICG Balkans Report N° 130 10 May 2002 POLICING THE POLICE IN BOSNIA: A FURTHER REFORM AGENDA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Despite more than six years of increasingly international pressure and supervision. Even with intrusive reforms carried out at the behest of the international insistence and assistance, UN Mission in Bosnia & Herzegovina (UNMIBH), investigations are often botched. Nowhere is this the local police cannot yet be counted upon to more evident than in cases involving the enforce the law. Too often – like their opposite continuation or consolidation of wartime numbers in the judiciary – nationally partial, ‘achievements’: ‘ethnic cleansing’, the under-qualified, underpaid, and sometimes corrupt appropriation of public assets and the maintenance police officers uphold the law selectively, within a of national-territorial divisions. Violence against dysfunctional system still controlled by politicised returning refugees and displaced persons waxes and nationalised interior ministries. and wanes with the political cycle, but cases are frequently left unresolved after an initial show of The ‘long arm of the law’ is inconsistent serious concern. In similar vein, most war crimes and infirm, suffering from jurisdictional divisions suspects enjoy the effective protection of ‘their that do not hinder organised crime and from own’. national-political manipulations that ensure there is one law for well-connected members of majority These unsophisticated but effective methods are populations and another for powerless minorities. symbolised and safeguarded by the continued Top-tier criminals ply their trades with relative employment of police officers who were complicit impunity, ethnic violence is tolerated and in war crimes. The law enforcement and criminal corruption is widespread. justice systems will remain compromised until these officers have been purged. Removal of these The role of the police is not seen as being to ‘serve and other recidivist or obstructionist elements has and protect’ everyone, but to serve and protect been slow. It only takes place when ordered by the ‘one’s own kind’, whether they be co-nationals, international community and, even then, is often colleagues or political masters. The communist- circumvented by the domestic authorities. Those era doctrine that the police exist to defend the who are removed frequently switch jobs within the regime persists, except that the working class has interior ministries, are rewarded with plum posts in been replaced by the nation as the ostensible publicly-owned companies, or gain elected office. beneficiary. Even ‘moderate’ politicians expect – Culpable individuals are rarely prosecuted. and are often allowed – to influence investigations, recruitment and budgetary allocations. Yet matters could be much worse. However halting the progress, the international community Citizens know they are not only unequal before the has taken police reform seriously from the outset – law, but unequal before its enforcers. Getting the and certainly more seriously than it has heretofore police to investigate cases that involve the taken judicial reform. At Dayton, the United moneyed or powerful invariably requires Nations was tasked to reform police forces that had Policing The Police In Bosnia: A Further Reform Agenda ICG Balkans Report N° 130, 10 May 2002 Page ii been part and parcel of their respective masters’ effective coordination among the war machines. After initial disorientation and organisations involved in order to: incapacity as it built up its resources and sought to flesh out its mandate, UNMIBH’s International (a) Standardise the terms and conditions Police Task Force (IPTF) began in earnest: under which police officers serve screening officers, de-authorising reprobates and across Bosnia & Herzegovina; war criminals among them, ensuring that (b) Guarantee that sufficient resources are ‘minority’ recruits are hired, seeking to depoliticise made available to support a police commands, creating new, all-Bosnian law- depoliticised, honest, competent and enforcement bodies such as the State Border cost-effective police service; Service (SBS), and facilitating inter-entity and (c) Provide a means for human rights regional co-operation. monitors to participate directly in the oversight of the police, alongside the UNMIBH has latterly been active across a broad follow-on mission. field and has initiated numerous remedial programs. After three years of intensified reform efforts, Bosnia’s police forces have begun to TO UNMIBH, EUPM AND OHR justify the decision taken at Dayton that they should be reformed rather than replaced. But the 2. Measures to enhance the accountability of UNMIBH mandate expires at the end of 2002. The Bosnia’s police forces should be put in train European Union (EU) decided
Recommended publications
  • The Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Unfulfilled Promise AI-DPC BiH Security Risk Analysis Policy Note # 04 by Kurt Bassuener Berlin - Sarajevo AI-DPC BiH Security Risk Analysis October 2015 Policy Note # 01Inflammatory political rhetoric by Bodo Weber http://democratizationpolicy.org and hate speech in Bosnia and Herzegovina:Berlin - Sarajevo political elites andSeptember the media 2015 A report from Atlantic Initiative & Democratization Policy Council Author: Kurt Bassuener Editing: Toby Vogel & DPC executive editorial board Berlin - Sarajevo October 2015 This paper was supported by: http://democratizationpolicy.org TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... I INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF HISTORY ............................................................................................................ 1 FORCE STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................................................ 2 AFBIH MISSIONS AND THE ONGOING DEFENSE REVIEW .............................................................................. 3 THE AFBIH IN THE POLARIZED POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................... 5 Politicization in the Ranks ................................................................................................................ 7 The Regimental System ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policing the Police in Bosnia
    POLICING THE POLICE IN BOSNIA: A FURTHER REFORM AGENDA 10 May 2002 Balkans Report N°130 Sarajevo/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 A. Current Context ...................................................................................................................1 B. The Origins Of UNMIBH/IPTF ..........................................................................................4 C. The Case For Joined-Up Police Reform..............................................................................7 II. POLICING STRUCTURES ..........................................................................................................9 A. Fragmentation......................................................................................................................9 B. Non-Cooperation With The Judiciary ...............................................................................12 C. The State Border Service (SBS) ........................................................................................15 D. Failures Of Regional Policing ...........................................................................................19 III. POLITICS AND POLICING ....................................................................................................... 22 IV. THE POLICING GAP: LOCAL CAPABILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 2, No. 1 (Trinity 2018)
    Vol. 2, No. 1 (Trinity 2018) Th e 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and America’s Endless War Harrison Akins Th e Intersection of the Bosnian War, the Mujahideen, and Counterterrorism Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina Nicola Mathieson Th e Quest for Islam in a Virtual Maze: How the Internet is Shaping Religious Knowledge among Young Muslims in Berlin-Kreuzberg Ines Gassal-Bosch Arab, Unionist, Republican: Th e Case of Ma'rūf al-Ruṣāfī Chris Hitchcock Memories and Narrations of “Nations” Past: Accounts of Early Migrants from Kerala in the Gulf in the Post-Oil Era M. H. Ilias 1 Oxford Middle East Review Vol. 2, No. 1 (Trinity 2018) Copyright © 2018 OMER | Oxford Middle East Review. All rights reserved. Senior Member Prof Eugene Rogan Managing Editors Krystel De Chiara, St Antony’s College Alexis Nicholson, St Antony’s College Section Editors Ameer Al-Khudari, St Antony’s College Ivo Bantel, St Antony’s College Manuel Giardino, Magdalen College Allison Holle, Exeter College Amaan Merali, St Cross College Bahar Saba, Wadham College Marral Shamshiri-Fard, St Antony’s College Chief Copy Editors Ceighley Cribb, St Antony’s College Naomi Lester, St Anne’s College Treasurer Naomi Lester, St Anne’s College Public Relations Manager Timo Schmidt, St Antony’s College Production Manager Allison Holle, Exeter College Events Manager Jeremy Jacobellis, Exeter College 2 Oxford Middle East Review is a non-partisan project that seeks to bring together a wide range of individuals with different backgrounds, beliefs, ideas, aspirations, viewpoints, and methodologies, while sharing an adherence to principles of equality, social justice, freedom of speech, and tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Report
    Country Report Bosnia and Herzegovina Gergana Tzvetkova, Mila Mancheva November 2019 This Country Report offers a detailed assessment of religious diversity and violent religious radicalisation in the above-named state. It is part of a series covering 23 countries (listed below) on four continents. More basic information about religious affiliation and state-religion relations in these states is available in our Country Profiles series. This report was produced by GREASE, an EU-funded research project investigating religious diversity, secularism and religiously inspired radicalisation. Countries covered in this series: Albania, Australia, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Malaysia, Morocco, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey and the United Kingdom. http://grease.eui.eu The GREASE project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 770640 Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Report GREASE The EU-Funded GREASE project looks to Asia for insights on governing religious diversity and preventing radicalisation. Involving researchers from Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, GREASE is investigating how religious diversity is governed in over 20 countries. Our work focuses on comparing norms, laws and practices that may (or may not) prove useful in preventing religious radicalisation. Our research also sheds light on how different societies cope with the challenge of integrating religious minorities and migrants. The aim is to deepen our understanding of how religious diversity can be governed successfully, with an emphasis on countering radicalisation trends. While exploring religious governance models in other parts of the world, GREASE also attempts to unravel the European paradox of religious radicalisation despite growing secularisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intersection of the Bosnian War, the Mujahideen, and Counterterrorism Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Intersection of the Bosnian War, the Mujahideen, and Counterterrorism Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina Nicola Mathieson Drawing upon the history of the participation of the mujahideen during the Bosnian War (1992-1995), Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) has used counterterrorism measures against its Muslim population in a post-9/11 environment. BiH’s targeting of its Muslim community has been facilitated by the lack of an international definition of terrorism or a mechanism to monitor and chastise states that misuse counterterrorism measures. To appreciate the significance of this global problem, the subsequent policy piece specifically examines Republika Srpska’s use of counterterrorism measures to target members of the Bosniak community and emphasizes the importance of formalising a standard definition of terrorism. Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), has long prided itself on its secularity and geography as a European capital. BiH consists of three main ethnic groups: Bosnian Croats, Bosnian Serbs, and Bosnian Muslims.1 Bosnia’s Muslim population, known as Bosniaks, have long referred to themselves as “European Muslims,” usually enforcing a strict division between themselves and “Arab Muslims.” During recent years, there has been a perceived increase of “Arab” and “Islamic” influence in BiH. Illidža, a suburb west of Sarajevo, has become a hub of Arab tourism. International funding from Muslim states has contributed to the construction of Sunni mosques that stand in stark contrast to the traditional wooden mosques dotted throughout the hills of Sarajevo’s suburbs. Arab tourists are increasingly investing in property throughout BiH2 and local Sarajevans have particularly noted an increased visibility of women in hijabs and niqabs.3 These changes are perceived to have begun during the Bosnian War.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Center for the Study of Democracy September 2020
    Radicalisation and Resilience Case Study Bosnia and Herzegovina Center for the Study of Democracy September 2020 This case study is part of a series of in-depth reports on religiously motivated violent radicalisation - and resilience to it - in 12 countries. The series examines periods in which religious radicalisation and violence has escalated and analyses relevant policy and political discourses surrounding them. While seeking to identify factors that drove radicalisation and violence in each country, the case studies also critically assess programmes of prevention and resilience-building, identifying good practices. This series was produced by GREASE, an EU-funded research project investigating religious diversity, secularism and religiously inspired radicalisation. Countries covered in this series: Australia, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Russia, Tunisia and the United Kingdom. http://grease.eui.eu The GREASE project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 770640 BiH Radicalisation and Resilience Case Study GREASE The EU-Funded GREASE project looks to Asia for insights on governing religious diversity and preventing radicalisation. Involving researchers from Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, GREASE is investigating how religious diversity is governed in over 20 countries. Our work focuses on comparing norms, laws and practices that may (or may not) prove useful in preventing religious radicalisation. Our research also sheds light on how different societies cope with the challenge of integrating religious minorities and migrants. The aim is to deepen our understanding of how religious diversity can be governed successfully, with an emphasis on countering radicalisation trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Center for the Study of Democracy September 2020
    Radicalisation and Resilience Case Study Bosnia and Herzegovina Center for the Study of Democracy September 2020 This case study is part of a series of in-depth reports on religiously motivated violent radicalisation - and resilience to it - in 12 countries. The series examines periods in which religious radicalisation and violence has escalated and analyses relevant policy and political discourses surrounding them. While seeking to identify factors that drove radicalisation and violence in each country, the case studies also critically assess programmes of prevention and resilience-building, identifying good practices. This series was produced by GREASE, an EU-funded research project investigating religious diversity, secularism and religiously inspired radicalisation. Countries covered in this series: Australia, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Egypt, France, Germany, Indonesia, Malaysia, Morocco, Russia, Tunisia and the United Kingdom. http://grease.eui.eu The GREASE project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 770640 BiH Radicalisation and Resilience Case Study GREASE The EU-Funded GREASE project looks to Asia for insights on governing religious diversity and preventing radicalisation. Involving researchers from Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, GREASE is investigating how religious diversity is governed in over 20 countries. Our work focuses on comparing norms, laws and practices that may (or may not) prove useful in preventing religious radicalisation. Our research also sheds light on how different societies cope with the challenge of integrating religious minorities and migrants. The aim is to deepen our understanding of how religious diversity can be governed successfully, with an emphasis on countering radicalisation trends.
    [Show full text]