Rachel Whiteread: 'I've Done the Same Thing Over and Over'
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
TURNER PRIZE: Most Prestigious— Yet Also Controversial
TURNER PRIZE: Most prestigious— yet also controversial Since its inception, the Turner Prize has been synonymous with new British art – and with lively debate. For while the prize has helped to build the careers of a great many young British artists, it has also generated controversy. Yet it has survived endless media attacks, changes of terms and sponsor, and even a year of suspension, to arrive at its current status as one of the most significant contemporary art awards in the world. How has this controversial event shaped the development of British art? What has been its role in transforming the new art being made in Britain into an essential part of the country’s cultural landscape? The Beginning The Turner Prize was set up in 1984 by the Patrons of New Art (PNA), a group of Tate Gallery benefactors committed to raising the profile of contemporary art. 1 The prize was to be awarded each year to “the person who, in the opinion of the jury, has made the greatest contribution to art in Britain in the previous twelve months”. Shortlisted artists would present a selection of their works in an exhibition at the Tate Gallery. The brainchild of Tate Gallery director Alan Bowness, the prize was conceived with the explicit aim of stimulating public interest in contemporary art, and promoting contemporary British artists through broadening the audience base. At that time, few people were interested in contemporary art. It rarely featured in non-specialist publications, let alone in the everyday conversations of ordinary members of the public. The Turner Prize was named after the famous British painter J. -
Anya Gallaccio
ANYA GALLACCIO Born Paisley, Scotland 1963 Lives London, United Kingdom EDUCATION 1985 Kingston Polytechnic, London, United Kingdom 1988 Goldsmiths' College, University of London, London, United Kingdom SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 NOW, The Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh, Scotland Stroke, Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA 2018 dreamed about the flowers that hide from the light, Lindisfarne Castle, Northumberland, United Kingdom All the rest is silence, John Hansard Gallery, Southampton, United Kingdom 2017 Beautiful Minds, Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom 2015 Silas Marder Gallery, Bridgehampton, NY Lehmann Maupin, New York, NY Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, San Diego, CA 2014 Aldeburgh Music, Snape Maltings, Saxmundham, Suffolk, United Kingdom Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA 2013 ArtPace, San Antonio, TX 2011 Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom Annet Gelink, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2010 Unknown Exhibition, The Eastshire Museums in Scotland, Kilmarnock, United Kingdom Annet Gelink Gallery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2009 So Blue Coat, Liverpool, United Kingdom 2008 Camden Art Centre, London, United Kingdom 2007 Three Sheets to the wind, Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom 2006 Galeria Leme, São Paulo, Brazil One art, Sculpture Center, New York, NY 2005 The Look of Things, Palazzo delle Papesse, Siena, Italy Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA Silver Seed, Mount Stuart Trust, Isle of Bute, Scotland 2004 Love is Only a Feeling, Lehmann Maupin, New York, NY 2003 Love is only a feeling, Turner Prize Exhibition, -
Who Owns the Art World? an Online Panel Discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This Short Panel
A DACS panel discussion, 14 March 2018 Who Owns the Art World? An online panel discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This short panel debate took place during DACS’ Annual Strategy Day, as we thought about the context in which artists are currently working and how best DACS could best support artists and artists’ estates in the future. The Panel Mark Waugh (Chair) is the Business Development Director at DACS. Hayley Newman, Artist and Reader of Fine Art, Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. Morgan Quaintance, writer, musician, broadcaster and curator. Richard Parry, Artist. Mark Waugh (MW): Welcome, and we’re live again at DACS, this time from RIBA, and we’re live with a specific question, it’s quite a simple question – “Who Owns the Art World?” And to answer that, what we’re going to have three presentations, one from Richard Parry, one from Hayley Newman and one from Morgan Quaintance. They come from very particular positions and I think you’ll be able to understand what those positions are after the presentations. Essentially, all three of them share a discourtesy of concern with that question of ownership - and not only the ownership of the art world in a conceptual and a material sense - but also in what the role and agency of the artist is, and indeed, art is, in that context. And we’re asking that in the context of DACS as an organisation which has a 30-year history of thinking about what artists can do to empower themselves and support each other. -
Gagosian Gallery
Artsy April 2, 2019 GAGOSIAN How Takashi Murakami Got His Start as an Artist Scott Indrisek “At the studio I rented for $80 a month on Lorimer Street in Brooklyn, uncertain whether I would have anything to eat the next day.” © Takashi Murakami/Kaikai Kiki Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Courtesy of Gagosian. In the second installment of a new series, we continue to shine a light on the tumultuous early days of artists who have since become household names. Takashi Murakami, 57, may now be an international art star and a cultural icon, but he was once a disgruntled student, bored with his conservative schooling and dreaming of better things. Indeed, when he was just starting out, Murakami claimed no special status as an artist. “I was never particularly talented at drawing or painting,” he said; hard work, practice, and determination would sharpen those skills. He had his first solo show in 1989, at Tokyo’s Ginza Surugadai Gallery, and began traveling from his native Japan to New York City around that time. Murakami always thought of New York as one of the art world’s vital centers, and he was willing to struggle in order to absorb what it had to offer. He recalled once renting a studio on Lorimer Street in Brooklyn for a mere $80 a month (“uncertain whether I would have anything to eat the next day,” he added). In 1994, he landed a residency in the prestigious PS1 International Studio Program. These early experiences helped shape Murakami’s unique artistic vision. The hyperconfident artist would eventually become a global brand, his manga-inspired creations taking over the world—one wild sculpture and painting at a time. -
Turner Prize Winner Lubaina Himid to Exhibit Unique Instructional Version of Vernet’S Studio in South Africa
NOT A SINGLE STORY –Turner Prize winner Lubaina Himid to exhibit unique instructional version of Vernet’s Studio in South Africa. Hosted from 12 May – 29 July at the NIROX Sculpture Park in the Cradle of Humankind, NOT A SINGLE STORY is a collaboration between the NIROX Foundation, South Africa and Wanås Konst, The Wanås Foundation, Sweden. NOT A SINGLE STORY is the NIROX Winter sculpture exhibition 2018. The exhibition and its educational program are made possible with the support of The Swedish Postcode Foundation, The Swedish Institute and the Swedish Embassy. NIROX Foundation: Facebook | Twitter| Instagram Wanås Konst, The Wanås Foundation: Facebook | Instagram On Saturday 12 May, the NIROX Sculpture Park opens the exhibition NOT A SINGLE STORY. The title references “The Danger of a Single Story,” a TED Talk presented by acclaimed novelist and feminist writer, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, which posits that our differences strengthen rather than divides us. Curated by Elisabeth Millqvist and Mattias Givell, co-directors of the Wanås Foundation, the exhibition is a celebration of diversity and includes works made of wishes, space blankets and large scale sound pieces by established and emerging artists from the continent and abroad. Notable is the participation of 2017 Turner Prize winner Lubaina Himid (ZNZ/UK) who will exhibit eight figures from the 26-piece installation Vernet’s Studio uniquely produced under instruction by studio artists at NIROX. This installation comprises of female artists from art history featuring the likes of Frida Kahlo, Rosemary Trocke, Maud Sulter and Georgia O’Keefe. This work is exemplary of Himid’s practise, which is embedded in foregrounding stories and narratives. -
Grayson Perry
GRAYSON PERRY Born in Chelmsford in 1960 Lives and works in London SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2017 The Most Popular Art Exhibition Ever!, Serpentine Galleries, London; travelling to Arnolfini, Bristol (2017) 2016 Hold Your Beliefs Lightly, Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht, The Netherlands; travelling to ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Aarhus, Denmark My Pretty Little Art Career, Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney 2015 Provincial Punk, Turner Contemporary, Margate Small Differences, Pera Museum, Istanbul, Turkey 2014 Who are You?, National Portrait Gallery, London Walthamstow Tapestry, Winchester Discovery Centre 2013 - 2017 The Vanity of Small Differences (UK Art Fund/British Council National and International Tour): Sunderland Museum & Winter Gardens, Tyne and Wear; Manchester Art Gallery, Manchester; Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, Birmingham; Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool; Leeds City Art Gallery, Leeds; Victoria Art Gallery, Bath; The Herbert Museum and Art Gallery, Coventry; Croome Park, Worcester; Beaney House of Art and Knowledge, Canterbury; Izolyatsia Platform for Cultural Initiatives, Kyiv, Ukraine; Museum of Contemporary Art Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia; National Gallery, Pristina, Kosovo; Art Gallery of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia 2012 The Vanity of Small Differences, Victoria Miro Gallery, London The Walthamstow Tapestry, William Morris Gallery, Walthamstow 2011 Grayson Perry: The Tomb of the Unknown Craftsman, The British Museum, London Grayson Perry, Louis Vuitton Maison, London Grayson Perry: Visual Dialogues, Manchester Art -
Rachel Whiteread
RACHEL WHITEREAD Born in Ilford, Essex in 1963 Lives and works in London, UK Eduction 1985–1987, Slade School of Art, London, England 1982–1985, Brighton Polytechnic, Brighton, England Solo Exhibitions 2017-2018 Rachel Whiteread, Tate Britain, London, England 2017 Place (Village), Victoria and Albert Museum of Childhood, London, England Rachel Whiteread, Galleria Lorcan O’Neill, Rome, Italy 2015 Rachel Whiteread: Looking In, Luhring Augustine, New York, NY Rachel Whiteread: Looking Out, Luhring Augustine Bushwick, Brooklyn, NY 2014 Rachel Whiteread, Gagosian Gallery, Geneva, Switzerland Rachel Whiteread: Study for Room, Museo d’Arte Moderna di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 2013 Rachel Whiteread: Detached, Gagosian Gallery, London, England 2011 Rachel Whiteread: Long Eyes, Luhring Augustine, New York, NY Rachel Whiteread: Looking On, Galleria Lorcan O’Neill Roma, Rome, Italy 2010 Rachel Whiteread: Drawings, Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Culture Center, Los Angeles, CA; Nasher Sculpture Center, Dallas, TX; Tate Britain, London, England* Rachel Whiteread, Gagosian Gallery, London, England Rachel Whiteread, Galerie Nelson-Freeman, Paris, France 2009 Rachel Whiteread, Portland Art Museum, Portland, OR WWW.SAATCHIGALLERY.COM RACHEL WHITEREAD 2008 Rachel Whiteread, Gagosian Gallery, Beverly Hills, CA Rachel Whiteread, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA 2007 Rachel Whiteread August Seeling Prize Exhibition, Stiftung Wilhelm Lehmbruck Museum, Duisburg, Germany Rachel Whiteread, Centro de Arte Contemporáneo de Málaga, Málaga, Spain Rachel Whiteread, Galleria -
My Article in the Last Issue of Finch's Quarterly About the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition Achieved a Very Modest Degree
Hungary for Culture Charles Saumarez Smith takes issue with the line of Brian (Sewell) and looks forward to the Royal Academy’s Treasures from Budapest exhibition My article in the last issue of Finch’s Quarterly about the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition achieved a modest degree of fame by being quoted in Brian Sewell’s review of this year’s exhibition in the Evening Standard: As its chief executive put it in the current edition of a journal of which he is arts editor, the Academy holds “the 18th-century view that the best judges of art are not the critics but the public. Critics may sneer, but the public continues to enjoy the Summer Exhibition precisely because it gives them an opportunity to make up their own minds about what to like.” Sewell went on to say: The public can make up its mind about fish and chips and jellied eels, but to put it in charge of the kitchens of The Ritz would not be wise. And I am less sure that Charles Saumarez Smith’s contempt for critics was widely held anywhere in Europe in the 18th century, the Age of Reason, when the Enlightenment held sway; and even if it were, then the public to which he refers was not the ancestor of some bloke on the Clapham bendy-bus, but an educated gentleman with the benefits of private tutoring, Eton, Oxbridge and the Grand Tour, as ready with a Greek or Latin tag as our beloved Boris Johnson. The chief executive will find little of that background among the old biddies from Berkshire up for the day. -
Conrad Shawcross
CONRAD SHAWCROSS Born 1977 in London, UK Lives and works in London, UK Education 2001 MFA, Slade School of Art, University College, London, UK 1999 BA (Hons), Fine Art, Ruskin School of Art, Oxford, UK 1996 Foundation, Chelsea School of Art, London, UK Permanent Commissions 2022 Manifold 5:4, Crossrail Art Programme, Liverpool Street station, Elizabeth line, London, UK 2020 Schism Pavilion, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France Pioneering Places, Ramsgate Royal Harbour, Ramsgate, UK 2019 Bicameral, Chelsea Barracks, curated by Futurecity, London, UK 2018 Exploded Paradigm, Comcast Technology Centre, Philadelphia, USA 2017 Beijing Canopy, Guo Rui Square, Beijing, China 2016 The Optic Cloak, The Energy Centre Greenwich Peninsula, curated by Futurecity, London, UK Paradigm, Francis Crick Institute, curated by Artwise, London, UK 2015 Three Perpetual Chords, Dulwich Park, curated and managed by the Contemporary Art Society for Southwark Council, London, UK 2012 Canopy Study, 123 Victoria Street, London, UK 2010 Fraction (9:8), Sadler Building, Oxford Science Park, curated and managed by Modus Operandi, Oxford, UK 2009 Axiom (Tower), Ministry of Justice, London, UK 2007 Space Trumpet, Unilever House, London, UK Solo Exhibitions 2020 Conrad Shawcross, an extended reality (XR) exhibition on Vortic Collect, Victoria Miro, London, UK Escalations, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France Celebrating 800 years of Spirit and Endeavour, Salisbury Cathedral, Salisbury, -
REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 the Preternatural Beauty and Equipoise of the Post-War Alexander Calder Mobiles
REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 The preternatural beauty and equipoise of the post-war Alexander Calder mobiles at Pace Gallery, Burlington Gardens, London, are more than offset/countered by the vertiginous acedie of the exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London, entitled “Gaiety is the Most Outstanding Feature of the Soviet Union: New Art from Russia.” Foremost in the latter instance is the series “The Neighbors” by Vikenti Nilin (born 1971). This series of ten images, all black-and-white giclée prints of the exact same size (165 x 110 cm.), is absolutely stunning – and chilling. Image (left) – Vikenti Nilin, “The Neighbors,” Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London One needs to walk the length of Green Park, Hyde Park, and Kensington Gardens to properly prepare oneself for Calder (“Calder After the War”) versus the new Russian photography at Saatchi. (In preparation, one could even stop at the Natural History Museum in Knightsbridge for “Genesis,” semi-objective documentary photography by Sebastião Salgado, if crowds and entrance fees are acceptable.) The Calder mobiles are all installed on two floors in a classic, modernist white gallery at the north end of the Royal Academy, the whiteness of the spaces a tribute to the extreme austerities of the Calder mobiles and stabiles – the path to abstraction fully developed by 1945, the works shown covering the years 1945 to 1949. Curiously or not, Calder’s ascendance also coincides with the slow decline of the modernist avant-garde, which by 1927 was more or less over. This is a contentious issue, but it is more than borne out by the commoditization of modern art well underway by the mid- 1920s and the peculiar turn by Joan Miró into the repetition of his previously anarchic canon principally for the emergent modernist art market – a similar practice that beset Moholy-Nagy, Kandinsky, and others, primarily while in Germany. -
Art REVOLUTIONARIES Six Years Ago, Two Formidable, Fashionable Women Launched a New Enterprise
Art rEVOLUtIONArIES SIx yEArS AgO, twO fOrmIdAbLE, fAShIONAbLE wOmEN LAUNchEd A NEw ENtErprISE. thEIr mISSION wAS tO trANSfOrm thE wAy wE SUppOrt thE ArtS. thEIr OUtSEt/ frIEzE Art fAIr fUNd brOUght tOgEthEr pAtrONS, gALLErIStS, cUrAtOrS, thE wOrLd’S grEAtESt cONtEmpOrAry Art fAIr ANd thE tAtE IN A whIrLwINd Of fUNdrAISINg, tOUrS ANd pArtIES, thE LIkES Of whIch hAd NEVEr bEEN SEEN bEfOrE. hErE, fOr thE fIrSt tImE, IS thEIr INSIdE StOry. just a decade ago, the support mechanism for young artists in Britain was across the globe, and purchase it for the Tate collection, with the Outset funds. almost non-existent. Government funding for purchases of contemporary art It was a winner all round. Artists who might never have been recognised had all but dried up. There was a handful of collectors but a paucity of by the Tate were suddenly propelled into recognition; the national collection patronage. Moreover, patronage was often an unrewarding experience, both acquired work it would never otherwise have afforded. for the donor and for the recipient institution. Mechanisms were brittle and But the masterstroke of founders Gertler and Peel was that they made it old-fashioned. Artists were caught in the middle. all fun. Patrons were whisked on tours of galleries around the world or to Then two bright, brisk women – Candida Gertler and Yana Peel – marched drink champagne with artists; galleries were persuaded to hold parties into the picture. They knew about art; they had broad social contacts across a featuring collections of work including those by (gasp) artists tied to other new generation of young wealthy; and they had a plan. -
Gagosian Gallery
Financial Times January 20, 2020 GAGOSIAN Living with Damien Hirst and friends Robert Tibbles was an early collector of the Young British Artists — now he is preparing to sell many of his acquisitions Melanie Gerlis Caption (TNR 9 Italicized) Everyone likes to say that they discovered an artist before they were famous, but in the case of the London bond salesman Robert Tibbles, the claim is true. Back in the 1980s, the late art dealer Karsten Schubert introduced Tibbles to the work of an art student called Damien Hirst. Alongside Charles Saatchi, Tibbles then became one of the now-superstar artist’s first buyers. So began an intense, 15-year collecting spree, mostly of works by Hirst and other Young British Artists. These now dominate Tibbles’s Victorian ground-floor flat in London’s leafy Kensington, where an early Hirst spot painting, “Antipyrylazo III” (1994), has loomed almost too large over the living room fireplace since Tibbles bought it in the year it was made. Hanging nearby is another early purchase — Hirst’s degree-show medicine cabinet “Bodies” (1989) — a work that demonstrates Tibbles’s aptitude for picking the right time in the art market as well as the debt markets. He bought the cabinet for £600 (again, in the year it was made) and now, as Tibbles prepares to sell much of his YBA collection at auction at Phillips in London, the cabinet is valued between £1.2m and £1.8m. “There’s no question that the medicine cabinet and other works were not liked or understood by many of my friends.