DOCSLIB.ORG

Judiciary Newsletter March 2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judiciary Newsletter March 2020.Pdf THE JUDICIARY March 2020 | Q4 ISSUE SEPTEMBER 2019 | Q2 ISSUE WHEN ACCOUNTABILITY FAILS, THE PEOPLE SUFFER A LIFE DEDICATED TO JUSTICE STATE OF THE NATION ADDRESS (SONA) JUDGES REGISTRABLE INTERESTS Judiciary Newsletter I II Judiciary Newsletter NATIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: 188 14th ROAD, NOORDWYK MIDRAND, 1685 SWITCHBOARD NUMBER 010 493 2500 Judiciary Newsletter III TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 COVID-19 Measures adopted by Heads of Court 04 When Accountability Fails, the People Suffer 08 A life dedicated to Justice 10 Facts on the COVID-19 Virus 11 Chief Justice Speaks 12 Wuzhen Declaration of The World Forum on Rule of Law in Internet 14 UWC Law Faculty celebrates 40th anniversary 15 Judicial Appointments and Retirements 16 Bringing Hope and Justice to a community 18 Judges Registrable Interests 19 Short Listed Candidates 20 Court Online 22 State of the Nation Address (SONA) EDITORIAL STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS Editor: Judge President Dunstan Mlambo Writers: Mr Brian Sokutu | Judge President Dunstan Mlambo | Justice Mahomed Navsa Judge Robert Henney | Judge Chantel Fortuin | Ms Lusanda Ntuli | Ms Pfunzo Mafenya Photographers: Mr Allister Slingers | Ms Lusanda Ntuli | Ms Pfunzo Mafenya | Ms Nontembiso Kgatle Designer: Ms Nontembiso Kgatle TheSouthAfricanJudiciary NATIONAL OFFICE: 188 14th Road, Noordwyk, Mindrand, 1685 @OCJ_RSA Judiciary RSA T: +27 10 493 2500 E: [email protected] @OCJ_RSA W: www.judiciary.org.za IV Judiciary Newsletter Editor It is my pleasure to present to you the first Issue of the Judiciary Newsletter for the year 2020. We trust that the first quarter of the year has been good to you and that you are making visible progress towards achieving your goals, not only for this year, but for the new decade as well. We publish this Issue as the world is faced with the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The outbreak of chronicles a remarkable life lived in service both to law this virus is proving to be one of the greatest challenges and to the struggle for social change and justice. We humanity has ever had to contend with and may yet preview the biography on page 8, with thanks to Mr prove to be catastrophic if all of us do not do what is Brian Sokutu. within our power to contain its spread. Members of the Judiciary have been out and about The President of the Republic, Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, has speaking on various platforms on an array of topics, declared a disaster in our country to underscore the both locally and abroad. As we always do, we share seriousness of the pandemic. Each of us has the duty with you what our colleagues have been saying in these to protect ourselves and those around us from infection platforms on pages 13 and 14. We express our gratitude by making simple hygiene practises second nature. to all the members of the Judiciary who have taken the time to provide us with transcripts for publishing in this As organisations, we also have the responsibility to newsletter. do all we can to protect members of the public that interact with us. We are very grateful for the leadership You will find more as you page through this Issue and that has been shown by the Heads of Court in this we hope that you will you will enjoy each and every regard, ably led by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, page. As we continue to live our new normal under the to introduce measures to make members of the public Coronavirus outbreak, let us be kind and considerate feel safe when they visit our courts. Read more about with one another. Let us remember our resilience as a these efforts on page 2. nation and find hope in the knowledge that this too shall pass. Okungapheli kuyahlola. Pan Macmillan recently published a biography of the late legal giant, Arthur Chaskalson. The memoir, titled Judge President Dunstan Mlambo Arthur Chaskalson: A Life Dedicated to Justice for All, Chairperson: Judicial Communications Committee Judiciary Newsletter 1 MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE HEADS OF COURT TO CURB THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 IN ALL COURTS. It is imperative that all court buildings have running water, toilet paper, soap, disinfectant wipes and all other relevant health and safety material. 2 Judiciary Newsletter DIRECTIVES ISSUED BY CHIEF JUSTICE MOGOENG • Handheld infrared thermometers (scanners) shall be MOGOENG IN TERMS OF SECTION 8(3)(b) OF THE made available to conduct the temperature screening SUPERIOR COURTS ACT, 2013. of Judicial officers, staff and members of the public; and Whereas on Sunday, 15 March 2020 Cabinet decided that: • Provision of bins for the disposal of biohazard material. (i) gatherings of more than 100 people will be prohibited; and (ii) where small gatherings are unavoidable, organizers will 3. It is imperative that all court buildings have running need to put in place stringent measures of prevention and water, toilet paper, soap, disinfectant wipes and all other control, in order to curb the spread of COVID-19 in South relevant health and safety material. Africa, . 4. A distance of 1 meter shall be maintained between Now, therefore, the Heads of Court have decided to adopt people seated in a court room. the following measures: 5. Judicial officers and court staff must self-isolate and 1. Persons with a material interest in a case, such as seek medical intervention if they display any symptoms. practitioners, litigants, accused persons, witnesses, those This also applies to those Judicial officers and staff who may be needed to provide support such as those members who have travelled to high risk areas or have accompanying children, victims of domestic violence been in contact with a person who has recently travelled, and/or sexual abuse, elderly and people with disabilities, displays symptoms or have been confirmed positive for family members, representatives of special interest COVID-19. or support groups and members of the media will be permitted to enter the court precinct. 6. The Heads of Court may make proposals to the Executive, in line with section 165 of the Constitution 2. All court buildings shall be secured to avoid exposing and the powers contained in the Superior Courts Act, Judicial Officers, court staff and members of the public 2013, to issue Regulations impacting on the operations to risk. To that end, the following measures shall be put of courts. in place: Judicial officers and • Decontamination of reception and admission areas / community service centres, court rooms, cells / court staff must self- detention facilities, offices, lifts, vehicles, biometrics and ablution facilities; and all other objects that are isolate and seek medical generally touched by persons utilising the facilities intervention if they including handles and taps. display any symptoms • Floor and work surfaces of court rooms, with special focus on maintenance, domestic violence and children’s 7. The Executive shall avail the necessary resources to court, shall be disinfected periodically, at least twice a ensure that these measures are implemented and that day during working hours; access to justice is enforced in line with provisions of • Assignment of officials who will sanitise hands of section 165(4) of the Constitution and the principle that officials (including service providers), persons in justice shall not only be done but must manifestly be custody, inmates and visitors at all entry and exit points; seen to be done. • Installation of secured alcohol (ethyl alcohol 70%) 8. The Department of Health, with the coordination of based sanitizer dispensers at all points of entry, exit, the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, shall work stations and in the passages/corridors; conduct assessments of the preventative measures at • All officials at reception, admission and operational Courts. areas shall be issued with appropriate protective equipment i.e. heavy duty gloves, N95 masks, 9. The Judiciary urges all to comply with the directives and protective eye shields etc (as per the Department of guidelines issued by the relevant Departments when Health Standard Operating Procedures); dealing with confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19. • Gloves shall be sanitised between searches; GOVERNMENT GAZETTE: NO. 43117 | VOL. 657 | 20 MARCH 2020 Scan the code with your phone to access the Gazetted Directives by the Chief Justice to address, prevent & curb the spread of the COVID-19 Virus in all the Court precincts in South Africa. Judiciary Newsletter 3 WHEN ACCOUNTABILITY FAILS, THE PEOPLE SUFFER The Judge President of the Gauteng Division of the High If government, which we Court, Judge Dunstan Mlambo, addressed a cocktail function on January 29 in Johannesburg hosted by the Black Lawyers’ are part of as the Judiciary, Association (BLA) to welcome members of the National Bar is the greatest reflection on Association (NBA), one of the largest Associations comprising of African-American lawyers and judges in the US. human nature then it must represent the best in human In addressing the role of the judiciary the following questions need to be assessed: values I hope no one disagrees with me when I say there exists an • Democracy and constitutionalism – what role does the important moral and ethical underpinning responsibility and judiciary have in promoting democratic practices in accountability to ordinary citizens on the part of government. societies that are deeply divided by racial lines, social I fear no contradiction when I suggest that when that injustices and poverty? accountability fails, the entire moral edifice of constitutionalism • What is the role of the courts and democratic institutions and democracy, fails. I mention the following examples to in upholding the rule of law and promoting a free and make my point. In South Africa, the poor are still holding on fair society? to the promises of the Constitution. • The Judiciary is the third arm of government – are we effective in keeping the other two arms in check? There are loud voices suggesting that the Constitution • How do we make use of these public engagements as remains a dream and the born frees regard the Constitution Judges in relation to what’s happening in our countries as a sellout document.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitutional Court of South Africa: Rights Interpretation and Comparative Constitutional Law
    THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA: RIGHTS INTERPRETATION AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Hoyt Webb- I do hereby swear that I will in my capacity asJudge of the Constitu- tional Court of the Republic of South Africa uphold and protect the Constitution of the Republic and the fundamental rights entrenched therein and in so doing administerjustice to all persons alike with- out fear,favour or prejudice, in accordance with the Constitution and the Law of the Republic. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Schedule 3 (Oaths of Office and Solemn Affirmations), Act No. 200, 1993. I swear that, asJudge of the ConstitutionalCourt, I will be faithful to the Republic of South Africa, will uphold and protect the Consti- tution and the human rights entrenched in it, and will administer justice to all persons alike withwut fear,favour or prejudice, in ac- cordancewith the Constitution and the Law. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Schedule 2 (Oaths and Solemn Affirmations), Act 108 of 1996. I. INTRODUCTION In 1993, South Africa adopted a transitional or interim Constitu- tion (also referred to as the "IC"), enshrining a non-racial, multiparty democracy, based on respect for universal rights.' This uras a monu- mental achievement considering the complex and often horrific his- tory of the Republic and the increasing racial, ethnic and religious tensions worldwide.2 A new society, however, could not be created by Hoyt Webb is an associate at Brown and Wood, LLP in NewYork City and a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28Th
    Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28th February 2013 Int This is an interview with Professor Frank Michelman, and it’s the 28th of February 2013. Frank, thank you so much for agreeing to participate in the Constitutional Court Oral History Project, we really appreciate your time. FM I’m very much honoured by your inviting me to participate and I’m happy to do so. Int Thank you. I’ve not had the opportunity to interview you before, and I wondered whether you could talk about early childhood memories, and some of the formative experiences that may have led you down a legal and academic professional trajectory? FM Well, that’s going to be difficult, because…because I didn’t have any notion at all prior to my senior year in college, the year before I entered law school, that I would be going to law school. I hadn’t formed, that I can recall, any plan, hope, ambition, in that direction at all. To the extent that I had any distinct career notion in mind during the years before I wound up going to law school? It would have been an academic career, possibly in the field of history, in which I was moderately interested and which was my concentration in college. I had formed a more or less definite idea of applying to graduate programs in history, and turning myself into a history professor. Probably United States history. United States history, or maybe something along the line of what’s now called the field of ideas, which I was calling intellectual history in those days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 60 Issue 1 Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional Rights, Article 5 Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy January 2016 The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa STEPHEN ELLMANN Martin Professor of Law at New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation STEPHEN ELLMANN, The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa, 60 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2015-2016). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 Stephen Ellmann The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa 60 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 57 (2015–2016) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen Ellmann is Martin Professor of Law at New York Law School. The author thanks the other presenters, commentators, and attenders of the “Courts Against Corruption” panel, on November 16, 2014, for their insights. www.nylslawreview.com 57 THE STRUGGLE FOR THE RULE OF LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 I. INTRODUCTION The blight of apartheid was partly its horrendous discrimination, but also its lawlessness. South Africa was lawless in the bluntest sense, as its rulers maintained their power with the help of death squads and torturers.1 But it was also lawless, or at least unlawful, in a broader and more pervasive way: the rule of law did not hold in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Book 2005-2015
    SOUTHERN AFRICA LITIGATION CENTRE CASE BOOK 2005-2015 10 Years of Strengthening Human Rights in Southern Africa SOUTHERN AFRICA LITIGATION CENTRE Contact us: president place, 1 hood avenue, rosebank, johannesburg, 2196 t: +27 (0) 10 596 8538 Follow us on Twitter, @follow_SALC www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org SOUTHERN AFRICA LITIGATION CENTRE CASE BOOK 2005-2015 10 Years of Strengthening Human Rights in Southern Africa SOUTHERN AFRICA LITIGATION CENTRE CASE BOOK 2005-2015 Contents Foreword 1 1 Women’s Land and Property Rights • Masupha v Senior Resident Magistrate for the Subordinate Court of Berea and Others 4 • Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another 7 • The Registered Trustees of the Women and Law (Malawi) Research & Education Trust v Attorney General 10 2 Children’s Rights • GK v K and Others 14 • R v The Republic 15 3 Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights • LM and Others v Government of Republic of Namibia 18 • Mapingure v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 21 4 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Persons’ Rights • Rammoge and Others v Attorney General of Botswana and Another 24 • S v M and Another 27 • The People v M and M 28 • The People v Paul Kasonkomona 29 5 HIV and Health Rights • Kingaipe and Another v Attorney General 32 • S v Mwanza Police and Others 34 • M v St Anne’s Hospital and Others 36 • Mwanza and Another v Attorney General 37 • Tapela and Others v Attorney General and Others 38 SALC CASE BOOK 6 Prisoners’ Rights • M v Attorney General 42 • M v The Republic 44 • M and Others v The Republic 45 • Paul
    [Show full text]
  • Natalia V28 Obituaries Didcott.Pdf
    Obituaries John Mowbray Didcott (1931-1998) John Didcott spent 23 years as a judge, first in the Natal Supreme Court and, since 1994, as a member of the Constitutional Court. He became a human rights legend because of his strong support ofjustice and individual liberties. During the worst years of apartheid his scathing attacks on the unjust policies of the previous government were pored over with delight by opponents of those policies. Chief Justice Ismail Mahomed recalls his 'sparkling moral courage' and says Judge Didcott's instinctive abhorrence of injustice will ensure he is remembered as one of the greatest figures of South African law. John Mobray Didcott was born in Durban on 14 August 1931, and matriculated in 1948 from Hilton College. He graduated from the University of Cape Town with a B A degree in 1951 and an LI.B in 1953. But he was not merely a successful swot he also flourished in student politics. In his first year he was elected to the Students' Representative Council and served as its president from 1952 to 1954. He was also vice-president of the National Union of South African Students in 1953 and 1954, and its president for the next two years. Durban attorney Graham Cox, a long-time friend, recalls those days with relish. 'He was a brilliant fellow, but in addition to being an incredible scholar, he was a magnificent speaker - quite superb as a demagogue. When he, Zach de Beer and Sharkey King (now judge-president-elect of the High Court in Cape Town) debated the government's race policies, there would be standing room only in Jamieson Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice: a Personal Account the Centre for Social Science Research at the University of by Edwin Cameron Cape Town
    THE JOURNAL OF THE HELEN SUZMAN FOUNDATION | ISSUE 73 | AUGUST 2014 BOOK REVIEW NICOLI NATRASS is a professor of Economics based in Justice: A Personal Account the Centre for Social Science Research at the University of by Edwin Cameron Cape Town. She has This gripping and well-written book is about the rule of law in South published widely on the political economy Africa and the Constitution in particular. It is especially appealing for its of AIDS, and on overtly personal lens. By situating himself in the story, Edwin Cameron unemployment, growth and inequality has produced a page-turning account of how progressive lawyers used the law to challenge key aspects of apartheid. He reveals the ways in which our democratic Constitution structures the often tricky relationship between law and politics. The book has enjoyed deservedly positive reviews with most focusing on Cameron’s extraordinary life, and how the challenges he has faced (notably poverty and AIDS) mirror the broader South African experience. For John Carlin, the personal story is so compelling he wants more detail, declaring that Cameron owes South Africa ‘a proper, full-blown autobiography’.1 But as Jonny Steinberg observes, Cameron’s biographical cameos are carefully selected and assembled to provide the ‘guts he gives to his defense of the rule of law’.2 Pointing out that it is through the stories of the lives of others that humans think about their world, Steinberg pens the following hope for Cameron’s book, referring to young readers in particular: ‘Alongside their image of Mandela in his cell, I want them to picture a white orphanage boy.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Politcsweb-Going-Off-The-Rails
    http://www.politicsweb.co.za/documents/going-off-the-rails--irr Going off the rails - IRR John Kane-Berman - IRR | 02 November 2016 John Kane-Berman on the slide towards the lawless South African state GOING OFF THE RAILS: THE SLIDE TOWARDS THE LAWLESS SOUTH AFRICAN STATE SETTING THE SCENE South Africa is widely recognised as a lawless country. It is also a country run by a government which has itself become increasingly lawless. This is so despite all the commitments to legality set out in the Constitution. Not only is the post–apartheid South Africa founded upon the principle of legality, but courts whose independence is guaranteed are vested with the power to ensure that these principles are upheld. Prosecuting authorities are enjoined to exercise their functions “without fear, favour, or prejudice”. The same duty is laid upon other institutions established by the Constitution, among them the public protector and the auditor general. Everyone is endowed with the right to “equal protection and benefit of the law”. We are all also entitled to “administrative action that is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair”. Unlike the old South Africa – no doubt because of it – the new Rechtsstaat was one where the rule of law would be supreme, power would be limited, and the courts would have the final say. This edifice, and these ideals, are under threat. Lawlessness on the part of the state and those who run it is on the increase. The culprits run from the president down to clerks of the court, from directors general to immigration officials, from municipal managers to prison warders, from police generals to police constables, from cabinet ministers to petty bureaucrats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Court Sitting to Mark the Departure of Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke from the Constitutional Court of South
    The Formal Court Sitting to Mark the Departure of Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke from the Constitutional Court of South Africa Friday, 20 May 2016 Chief Justice, former President Thabo Mbeki and Mrs Mbeki; former President Kgalema Motlanthe and Mrs Motlanthe, President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Justices of the Constitutional Court – both currently sitting and retired. Judges President, Heads of Courts and Judges of all our courts, the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, Deputy Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, leaders of political parties and of social movements, all formations within the legal fraternity, Deans of Law Schools, members of my family, and in particular my wife, Kabo Moseneke and my mother, Karabo Moseneke. Allow me also to welcome all patriots, compatriots and citizens of our land and friends who have cared to come and observe this moment with us. I will cease to hold office as a Deputy Chief Justice of the Republic and retire from the Constitutional Court of South Africa at midnight today, 20 May 2016. I have had the distinct privilege of serving the judicial bench for 15 years; of which no less than a continuous period of 14 years I served in the Highest Court of the Republic. A formal ceremony, such as the present, is by now well etched in our judicial convention. The Judiciary knows no better way of celebrating and sending off one of its own than in the very forum in which it dispenses justice. It is a time honoured tradition that on an occasion as the present, fellow colleagues who 1 hold judicial office would robe and so would counsel and be in attendance as a mark of homage to the departing Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Making the Road.Fm
    INTRODUCTION HAPTER C 1 Michael Cosser, Narnia Bohler-Muller & Gary Pienaar 1Introduction 1.1 Making the road by walking The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, the final draft of which was forged over a two-year period between 1994 and 1996, assumed a particular profile in the body politic in 2016. Following the release of the Public Protector’s 2014 report on improvements to President Zuma’s Nkandla residence,1 the Constitutional Court in March 2016 declared binding her findings and recommendations about the need for the President to repay public monies spent on non-security upgrades to his residence.2 Such high-profile cases, however, can distract us from the importance of the Constitution in shaping the lives of ordinary people. In catapulting the Constitution into the limelight, the ‘Nkandla judgement’, as it is known colloquially, has created renewed interest in what meaning the Constitution has for South Africans in 2018 and beyond. The initial impetus for this book came from a public address by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo. Delivered on 30 June 2016 and entitled ‘Why does the Constitution matter?’, his address began with an almost throwaway comment: that he was ‘privileged enough … to participate in constructing our foundational jurisprudence on constitutional law.’3 Ngcobo went on to say that the process of building a constitutional 1 Public Protector South Africa ‘Secure in comfort’ http://www.pprotect.org/library/ investigation_report/2013-14/Final Report 19 March 2014 pdf (accessed 23 May 2017). 2 Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC).
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: the Case of South Africa
    Fordham Law Review Volume 66 Issue 2 Article 8 1997 Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa Brice Dickson Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brice Dickson, Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 531 (1997). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol66/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa Cover Page Footnote Professor of Law, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland. The author gratefully acknowledges financial assistance from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust and the British Academy. He also wishes to thank the staff of the Registrar's Office at the Constitutional Court for facilitating his research. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol66/iss2/8 PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS THROUGH A CONSTITUTIONAL COURT: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA Brice Dickson* INTRODUCTION T HIS article explores the South African Constitutional Court's early record in protecting human rights. After considering the or- igins of the Court and the jurisdiction conferred on it first by the In- terim Constitution of 1994 and then by the Constitution of 1996, this article summarizes the provisions of those constitutions which protect human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Democracy and Human Rights
    Reflections on Democracy and Human Rights: A Decade of the South African Constitution (Act 108 of 1996) South African Human Rights Commission Human Rights House 29 Princess of Wales Terrace, corner York & St Andrews Sts Parktown Johannesburg Private Bag 2700 Houghton 2041 www.sahrc.org.za © South African Human Rights Commission 2006 First published in South Africa in 2006 ISBN 0-620-36364-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the express permission, in writing of the publisher. Copy editing and project management by Wordsmiths Publishing Services www.wordsmiths.org.za Designed, printed and bound by Creda Communications, Cape Town, South Africa Foreword On the occasion of the tenth anniversary of our Con- we have gone about discharging the Constitutional stitution, there can be little argument that the human contract, and, in particular, how we have collectively rights values underpinning our democratic dispensa- used the vision of the Constitution as a central vehicle tion become increasingly entrenched with the passage in the transformation of our society. of time. The language and message of human rights This publication seeks to make a contribution in that define critical processes such as law and policy-mak- process of reflection and assessment. Through the ing; the relationship between citizens and the state; and various contributions, we seek to present an overview the relationships among and between citizens and, in of the progress made on various fronts and sectors, the many instances, non-citizens.
    [Show full text]