DOCSLIB.ORG

National Monitoring System Report on the Situation of Internally Displaced Persons Round 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Monitoring System Report on the Situation of Internally Displaced Persons Round 14 U.S. Department of State Bureau Ministry of Social Policy Ministry of Veterans Affairs, of Population, Refugees, and Migration of Ukraine Temporarily Occupied Territories and Internally Displaced Persons of Ukraine NATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS June 2019 Cover and internal cover page photos: Photographic retouchers Alisa and Yevhen fled from Donetsk to Kharkiv in 2014. Here, in Kharkiv, their son Matvii was born. Alisa participated in IOM’s economic empowerment programme for IDPs and received а computer, а monitor and а graphical tablet. Recently the couple bought a professional camera, so now they provide not just retouching, but photo-shooting and graphic design services as well. © Volodymyr Shuvayev/IОМ This publication was produced with funding from the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). The views and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the position of the PRM, and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps used in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The project is funded by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, and implemented by the U.S. Department of State Bureau International Organization for Migration (IOM) of Population, Refugees, and Migration CONTENT INTRODUCTION . 4 OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY OF ROUND 14 . 5 OVERALL SUMMARY . 6 1 . CHARACTERISTICS OF IDPs AND THEIR HOUSEHOLDS . 8 • IDP household members . 8 • Gender and age structure . 9 • IDPs with disabilities . 9 • Education . 9 2 . EMPLOYMENT OF IDPs . 10 • Employment rates . 10 • Unemployment rates . 12 3 . WELL-BEING OF IDPs . 15 • Livelihood opportunities . 15 • Living conditions and types of accommodation . 23 • Suspension of social payments . 27 • Safety of the environment and infrastructure . 30 • Human trafficking and labour exploitation . 31 4 . ACCESS TO SOCIAL SERVICES . 32 5 . IDP MOBILITY . 35 • Displacement . 35 • Intentions to return . 36 • Intentions to move abroad . 38 • Visits to domicile before the displacement . 38 6 . INTEGRATION INTO LOCAL COMMUNITIES . 43 • Integration rates . 43 • Discrimination . 48 7 . ELECTORAL RIGHTS . 50 8 . RETURNEES TO THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS . 53 9 . ANNEXES . 65 June 2019 3 The project is funded by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, U.S. Department and Migration, and implemented by the of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Migration INTRODUCTION According to the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine, line. The main share of IDPs is located in Donetsk at the period of survey conduction there were Oblast (487,952), Luhansk Oblast (271,367), Kyiv city 1,385,062 internally displaced persons (IDPs) who (148,740) and Kyiv Oblast (57,123), Kharkiv Oblast left their homes and moved to other areas and re- (129,168), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (68,911) and gions of Ukraine looking for safety. Among those IDPs, Zaporizhia Oblast (54,714). 60 per cent have moved from their previous place In 2016, IOM began conducting regular complex of residence located in Donetsk Oblast, 37 per cent survey of the situation with IDPs in Ukraine, the Na- have been displaced from Luhansk Oblast, and tional Monitoring System (NMS). The goal of the re- 3 per cent have left their homes in the Auton omous search is monitoring of different aspects of IDPs life: Republic of Crimea. Half of the registered IDPs per- material well-being, employment, social problems, manently reside in the GCA in Donetsk and Luhansk needs, mobility and integration of the IDPs into oblasts, beyond the 20 km area along the contact the local communities. KYIV CITY 148,740 VOLYN CHERNIHIV 3,097 SUMY RIVNE 7,220 2,984 11,081 ZHYTOMYR 7,058 LVIV KYIV 10,469 KHARKIV KHMELNYTSKYI POLTAVA 57,123 129,168 TERNOPIL 5,939 22,479 CHERKASY LUHANSK 2,095 10,884 271,367 VINNYTSIA IVANO- FRANKIVSK 11,035 DNIPRO ZAKARPATTIA 3,658 3,314 KROPYVNYTSKYI 68,911 6,518 DONETSK CHERNIVTSI 2,464 487,952 ZAPORIZHIA MYKOLAIV 54,714 ODESA 8,106 TOTAL 35,304 KHERSON NUMBER 13,382 OF IDPs IN UKRAINE 1,385,062 ACCORDING TO THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL POLICY 4 NATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS The project is funded by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, and implemented by the U.S. Department of State Bureau International Organization for Migration (IOM) of Population, Refugees, and Migration OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY OF ROUND 14 The objective of the National Monitoring System (NMS) maintained by the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine in Ukraine, drawing from IOM’s Displacement Track- were interviewed using this method by IOM between ing Matrix (DTM) approach, is to support the Govern- April–June 2019. Out of the total, 3,222 interviews ment of Ukraine in collecting and analyzing informa- were with IDPs residing in the government-controlled tion on the socioeconomic characteristics of internally area (GCA), and 851 interviews were with returnees displaced persons (IDPs) and IDP households, as well to the non-government controlled area (NGCA)1 . as the challenges they face. IOM adapted the DTM, a system designed to regularly capture, process and Data from telephone interviews were combined disseminate information on displacement situations, with data from face-to-face interviews. The combin- to the Ukrainian context. The NMS provides a better ing of these two data sets was done using a statis- understanding of the evolving movements and loca- tical weighting tool. Both data sets were weighted tions, numbers, vulnerabilities and needs of displaced according to the regional distribution of registered populations in Ukraine. IDPs. Data from telephone interviews were also weighted according to the sociodemographic char- The survey collected information on socioeconomic acteristics of IDPs interviewed face-to-face. characteristics of IDPs at individual and household levels, including trends and movement intentions, Face-to-face interviews with people crossing employment, livelihood opportunities, access to the contact line social services and assistance needs in 24 oblasts of 1,255 people crossing the contact line were inter- Ukraine and the city of Kyiv. viewed using this method during May 2019 . The sur- Main information sources used for the NMS: vey was conducted at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the NGCA, which currently function in Lu- i) Data from sample surveys of IDPs via face- hansk and Donetsk oblasts. to-face interviews; ii) Data from sample surveys of IDPs via tel- Data from the survey of people crossing the contact ephone interviews; line were used to complement ongoing data col- iii) Data from sample surveys of the people lection for the sections on “IDP mobility” and “Re- crossing the contact line via face-to-face turnees to the non-government controlled areas”. interviews; iv) Data from focus group discussions; Focus group discussions v) Administrative data and relevant data avail- Five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted able from other sources. during the period of May–June 2019, specifically two FGDs with key informants, two FGDs with IDPs and Face-to-face interviews with IDPs one FGD with returnees to the NGCA . The FGDs with A total of 2,401 IDPs were interviewed using this IDPs took place in Ternopil and Izium, with key in- method in 300 territorial units across the country formants in Sumy and Zhytomyr, and with returnees during the period of April–June 2019. The sampling in Starobilsk. The FGDs covered people living in both of territorial units was devised for all government- urban and rural areas . controlled areas of Ukraine and distributed in pro- portion to the number of registered IDPs. Please see Annex 1 for more details on methodology. Telephone interviews with IDPs 1 The sampling was derived from the IDP registration A total of 4,073 individuals registered in the Unified database maintained by the Ministry of Social Policy of Information Database of Internally Displaced Persons Ukraine June 2019 5 The project is funded by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, U.S. Department and Migration, and implemented by the of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Migration OVERALL SUMMARY 1. Characteristics of IDPs and their households. Average size Age distribution Gender distribution Households Households with of household of household members of household members with children persons with disabilities 60 and over – 19% Female – 58% 2 .40 persons 18–59 years – 57% 36% of IDP households 11% of IDP households Male – 42% Under 18 years – 24% 2. Employment of IDPs. The employment rate of IDPs slightly decreased compared to the previous round. As of April–June 2019, the share of employed IDPs amounted to 46 per cent. Among the total popula- tion of Ukraine, the level of employment remained stable and as of the first quarter of 2019 amounted to 57 per cent of the population aged 15–70 years2 . Employment of IDPs after the displacement, by rounds, % 46 49 50 48 48 46 41 42 43 44 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 (March (June (September (December (March (June (September (December (March (June 2017) 2017) 2017) 2017) 2018) 2018) 2018) 2018) 2019) 2019) Seven (7%) per cent of IDPs reported that they had The economically inactive population amounted to been actively seeking employment and were ready 47 per cent among surveyed IDPs, with the largest to start working within a two-week period. The vast portion being retired persons or pensioners (24%) majority (91%) of them noted that they had faced dif- and persons who were doing housework, looking af- ficulties when looking for a job.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Local Csos on Implementing Anti-Corruption Reforms in the Regions of Ukraine
    Report 12/2019 IMPACT OF LOCAL CSOS on ImplementIng AntI-corruptIon reforms In the regIons of ukrAIne Oksana Nesterenko (ACREC of NAUKMA) | Max Bader (Leiden University) 1 This report is issued within the Think Tank Development Initiative for Ukraine, implemented by the International Renaissance Foundation in partnership with the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) with financial support from the Embassy of Sweden to Ukraine. The opinions and content expressed in this Policy Brief are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Embassy of Sweden to Ukraine, the International Renaissance Foundation and the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE). 2 PREFACE PART I PART II Part ІІІ Cherkasy Region Conclusions and recommendations Why support anti-corruption Chernihiv Region activism in the regions of Ukraine? Chernivtsi Region Attachment 1. Dnipropetrovsk Region (Dnіpro, Kryvyi Rіh, Nіkopol, Impact Rating Scale of Local Activities and impact of Marhanets) Anti-corruption CSOs regional activists Donetsk Region Kharkiv Region Attachment 2. Instruments and activities Kherson Region Anti-corruption CSOs Map Zhytomyr Region Impact Mykolayiv Region Rivne Region The significance of local context Volyn Region Ivano-Frankivsk Region The importance of Khmelnytsky Region strengthening capacity Sumy Region Kirovograd Region Odesa Region Zakarpattya Region Zaporizhzhya Region Lviv Region Ternopil Region Vinnytsya Region Poltava Region Luhansk Region Kyiv Region 3 PREFACE The success of Ukraine’s anti-corruption drive hinges on its implementation at different administrative levels, especially in light of the ongoing decentralization reform. Given that civil society organizations can fulfill an important role in anti-corruption, it is important that such organizations develop sufficient capacity not only at the national level, but in the regions of Ukraine as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Economic Impact of Hiv and Aids in Ukraine : a Re-Study
    BRITISH COUNCIL UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH This Project was implemented with financial support from the Department of International Development of the United Kingdom (DFID) and the British Council for the Government of Ukraine THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HIV AND AIDS IN UKRAINE : A RE-STUDY Olga Balakireva Alla Scherbyns’ka Yulia Galustian Yuriy Kruglov Olexander Yaremenko Ukrainian AIDS Centre at the Health Ukrainian Institute of Social Ministry of Ukraine Research Nataliya Levchuk Volodymyr Onikienko Institute of Economy, National Council for Studying Productive Academy of Science of Ukraine Forces, National Academy of Science of Ukraine Lidiya Andruschak UNAIDS In co-operation with international consultants Tony Barnett, University of East Anglia, UK and Alan Whiteside, University of Natal, South Africa Edited by Veena Lakhumalani, The British Council, Ukraine 14 Kyiv City - 2001 Contents INTRODUCTION Executive summary Section 1. THE NATURE OF HIV/AIDS AND THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIC Section 2. HIV AND AIDS DATA 2.1 HIV Data 2.2 AIDS Data 2.3 General conclusions Section 3. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES 3.1. Concepts of Susceptibility and Vulnerability 3.2. Description of Models for Projecting the Development of HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine and Incoming Data 3.3. Projecting the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine: main results Section 4. UKRAINE AS A RISK ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Demographic Situation in Ukraine 4.2 Social and Economic Characteristics of the Contemporary Ukrainian Society 4.3 Attitudes to People with HIV and AIDS in Ukraine 4.4 Behavioural Factors Contributing to HIV/AIDS Epidemic 4.5 Bio-Medical Factors and HIV Susceptibility 4.6 Regressive Analysis of Influence of Regional Development Factors on HIV-Infection Prevalence 4.7 Conclusions Section 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: Travel Advice
    Ukraine: Travel Advice WARSZAWA (WARSAW) BELARUS Advise against all travel Shostka RUSSIA See our travel advice before travelling VOLYNSKA OBLAST Kovel Sarny Chernihiv CHERNIHIVSKA OBLAST RIVNENSKA Kyivske Konotop POLAND Volodymyr- OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Volynskyi Korosten SUMSKA Sumy Lutsk Nizhyn OBLAST Novovolynsk ZHYTOMYRSKA MISTO Rivne OBLAST KYIV Romny Chervonohrad Novohrad- Pryluky Dubno Volynskyi KYIV Okhtyrka (KIEV) Yahotyn Shepetivka Zhytomyr Lviv Kremenets Fastiv D Kharkiv ( ni D pr ni o Lubny Berdychiv ep Kupiansk er LVIVSKA OBLAST KHMELNYTSKA ) Bila OBLAST Koziatyn KYIVSKA Poltava Drohobych Ternopil Tserkva KHARKIVSKA Khmelnytskyi OBLAST POLTAVSKA Starobilsk OBLAST OBLAST Stryi Cherkasy TERNOPILSKA Vinnytsia Kremenchutske LUHANSKA OBLAST OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Izium SLOVAKIA Kalush Smila Chortkiv Lysychansk Ivano-Frankivsk UKRAINEKremenchuk Lozova Sloviansk CHERKASKA Luhansk Uzhhorod OBLAST IVANO-FRANKIVSKA Kadiivka Kamianets- Uman Kostiantynivka OBLAST Kolomyia Podilskyi VINNYTSKA Oleksandriia Novomoskovsk Mukachevo OBLAST Pavlohrad ZAKARPATSKA OBLAST Horlivka Chernivtsi Mohyliv-Podilskyi KIROVOHRADSKA Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Khrustalnyi OBLAST Rakhiv CHERNIVETSKA DNIPROPETROVSKA OBLAST HUNGARY OBLAST Donetsk Pervomaisk DONETSKA OBLAST Kryvyi Rih Zaporizhzhia Liubashivka Yuzhnoukrainsk MOLDOVA Nikopol Voznesensk MYKOLAIVSKA Kakhovske ZAPORIZKA ODESKA Vodoskhovyshche OBLAST OBLAST OBLAST Mariupol Berezivka Mykolaiv ROMANIA Melitopol CHIȘINĂU Nova Kakhovka Berdiansk RUSSIA Kherson KHERSONSKA International Boundary Odesa OBLAST
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University
    Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL) Volume 25 Number 1 Spring 2010 Article 5 Spring 2010 Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University Bridget A. Goodman University of Pennsylvania Nina A. Lyulkun Khmel'nyts'kyi National University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel Part of the Education Commons, and the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Goodman, B. A., & Lyulkun, N. A. (2010). Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University. 25 (1), Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol25/iss1/5 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol25/iss1/5 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University This article is available in Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL): https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/ vol25/iss1/5 Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukrainian University1 Bridget A. Goodman University of Pennsylvania Nina A. Lyulkun Khmel’nyts’kyi National University This article presents results of an exploratory survey conducted at a central- western Ukrainian university of students’ current usage of and attitudes towards Ukrainian, Russian, and English. Before 1989, Soviet language policy positioned Russian over Ukrainian as the language of power and as the sole language of higher education. The effectiveness of national policies in post-Soviet Ukraine aimed at affirmative action for the Ukrainian language has been debatable and constrained by geographical factors of language use and language policy. The po- litical and economic status of English has the potential to impact the position of both Ukrainian and Russian in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Odessa Intercultural Profile
    City of Odessa Intercultural Profile This report is based upon the visit of the CoE expert team on 30 June & 1 July 2017, comprising Irena Guidikova, Kseniya Khovanova-Rubicondo and Phil Wood. It should ideally be read in parallel with the Council of Europe’s response to Odessa’s ICC Index Questionnaire but, at the time of writing, the completion of the Index by the City Council is still a work in progress. 1. Introduction Odessa (or Odesa in Ukrainian) is the third most populous city of Ukraine and a major tourism centre, seaport and transportation hub located on the northwestern shore of the Black Sea. Odessa is also an administrative centre of the Odessa Oblast and has been a multiethnic city since its formation. The predecessor of Odessa, a small Tatar settlement, was founded in 1440 and originally named Hacıbey. After a period of Lithuanian control, it passed into the domain of the Ottoman Sultan in 1529 and remained in Ottoman hands until the Empire's defeat in the Russo-Turkish War of 1792. In 1794, the city of Odessa was founded by decree of the Empress Catherine the Great. From 1819 to 1858, Odessa was a free port, and then during the twentieth century it was the most important port of trade in the Soviet Union and a Soviet naval base and now holds the same prominence within Ukraine. During the 19th century, it was the fourth largest city of Imperial Russia, and its historical architecture has a style more Mediterranean than Russian, having been heavily influenced by French and Italian styles.
    [Show full text]
  • One Ukraine Or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 2004 One Ukraine or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences Lowell W. Barrington & Erik S. Herron Intra-state regional differences are a central topic in the study of European and Eurasian politics. In Ukraine, regional differences have proven to be powerful predictors of mass attitudes and political behavior. But what does the “regional factor” in Ukrainian politics represent? Is it simply the result of compositional effects, or are the regional differences more than just a sum of other demographic factors correlated with geographic divisions? When analyzing regional divisions as an explanatory variable, what are the implications of employing different regional frameworks? In this article, we demonstrate how geographic divisions in the country hold up even when others factors—such as ethnicity and language use—are con- trolled for. As part of this inquiry, we compare the results of three competing regional frameworks for Ukraine: one with two regions, one with four regions and one with eight regions. While the eight-region framework is uncommon in studies of Ukraine, the decision to examine eight regions is supported by historical, economic and demographic arguments, as well as by the results of the statistical analyses presented in this article. Scholars who have focused on fewer regions in Ukraine may have underestimated the effects of regional differences and missed interesting stories about intra-state variation in Ukrainian attitudes and voting behavior. The results of this study carry important implications not only for the study of Ukraine but also for those interested in intra-state regional divisions across Europe and Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT for the Implementation of the PULSE Project
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project APRIL – JUNE, 2020 (²I² QUARTER OF US FISCAL YEAR 2020) EIGHTEENTH QUARTER OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION QUARTERLY REPORT for the implementation of the PULSE Project TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations 4 Resume 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING QUARTER 5 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 7 Expected Result 1: Decentralisation enabling legislation reflects local government input 7 1.1. Local government officials participate in sectoral legislation drafting 8 grounded on the European sectoral legislative principles 1.1.1. Preparation and approval of strategies for sectoral reforms 8 1.1.2. Preparation of sectoral legislation 24 1.1.3. Legislation monitoring 33 1.1.4. Resolving local government problem issues and promotion of sectoral reforms 34 1.2. Local governments and all interested parties are actively engaged and use 40 participatory tool to work on legislation and advocating for its approval 1.2.1 Support for approval of drafted legislation in the parliament: 40 tools for interaction with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 1.2.2 Support to approval of resolutions and directives of the Cabinet of Ministers: 43 tools for interaction with the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine 1.3. Local governments improved their practice and quality of services 57 because of the sound decentralised legislative basis for local governments 1.3.1. Legal and technical assistance 57 1.3.2. Web-tools to increase the efficiency of local government activities 57 1.3.3. Feedback: receiving and disseminating 61 Expected Result 2: Resources under local self-governance authority increased 62 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile
    Khmelnytskyi Investment Profile 2019 Table of Contents About Khmelnytskyi Economics and Key Sectors Business Environment Why Khmelnytskyi? Infrastructure Trade and Services Doing Business Summary Economic Data Garment Industry Industrial Park Key Facts Railway Transport Food Processing Local Taxes and Fees Geopolitical Profile Road Transport Construction Trading and Office of the City Centers Municipal Public Industries and Logistics Transport Event and Exhibition BPO / SSC / IT sector Facilities Investments Success Stories Standard of Living Labour Market Other Relevant in Khmelnytskyi and Education Information Quality of Life Labour Market Interesting Facts Municipal Services Education about Khmelnytskyi Annual Key Events Transportation Universities in Khmelnytskyi Cost of Living Achievements Municipal Institutions 2 3 About Khmelnytskyi Photo: Oleksandr Savenko Why Khmelnytskyi? Strategic Qualified The most The largest Vivid geographical labour force affordable trading center cultural location housing in Western life market Ukraine 6 7 Summary Key Facts Transit Routs Area Khmelnytskyi is a marketplace for innovation and opportunity. The city is one of the best Time zone UTC +2 Gdansk places for doing business in Ukraine, which has Climate Temperate continental dynamic development, progressive views and Accessibility By train — from Poland, Slovakia, the safest city foresight of its residents. According to Focus Kyiv Romania, Bulgaria and Russia. in Ukraine Rava-Ruska magazine Khmelnytskyi was recognized as one Lviv By bus — from more than 100 Pshemysl of the most comfortable cities in Ukraine – it got European cities. second place (after Kyiv) and was ranked first in the Transparency and financial health of cities Population (2019) 273,700 Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Chop and regions in Ukraine survey conducted by the The average monthly gross ₴ 8,513 / € 288 Chernivtsi International Center for Policy Studies in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivne, Ivano-Frankivsk and Ternopil Oblasts
    THE CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME POLAND-BELARUS-UKRAINE 2007-2013 RIVNE, IVANO-FRANKIVSK AND TERNOPIL OBLASTS REGIONAL HANDBOOK European Union Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland - Belarus - Ukraine 2007-2013 1 2 Cover photograph: Serhiy Neupokoyev CONTENT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP MAP 8 PROJECTS REGIONAL RESULTS 9 INTRODUCTION TO THE REGIONS 10 IPBU.03.01.00-06-470/11 15 Investment in culture. Comprehensive action for cultural education IPBU.03.01.00-90-701/11 18 Student with initiative: vector of energy saving IPBU.01.01.00-88-784/11 20 Development of small and medium entrepreneurship in Rivne and Lublin PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED IN THE REGIONS 22 Data in the publication as of the second half of 2014 3 Dear Reader, It has been 10 years since Poland joined the European Union. As a result, the Polish Eastern border also became an external border of the EU. European Neighbourhood Policy instruments were made available to develop cross-border cooperation with the Eastern neighbours based on common values and goals. Building a zone of sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity and tolerance became a joint priority for the border regions of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. The border regions gained a great opportunity to strengthen their cooperation through the realisation of com- mon projects within the ENPI CBC Programme Poland-Bela- rus-Ukraine 2007-2013. I am proud to present a series of publications reflecting how the regions from the eligible area of the Programme ap- proached cross-border cooperation and what specific pro- jects are being implemented on their territories to improve development processes.
    [Show full text]