AF Transferable Technologies.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AF Transferable Technologies.Pdf PROF M S SWAMINATHAN Founder Chairman and Chief Mentor UNESCO Chair in Ecotechnology M S Swaminathan Research Foundation Third Cross Street, Taramani Institutional Area Chennai - 600 113 Preface Agroforestry combines the benefits of agriculture and forestry in the areas of ecological, food and livelihood security. Agroforestry systems have made very important contributions to local level food security as well as to soil health enhancement and conservation. The present publication is based on agroforestry systems and technologies generated under the All India Coordinated Research Projects in agroforestry of ICAR. This project initiated in 1983 currently has 37 coordinating centres across the country. India is the first country in the world to have developed and announced a National Agroforestry Policy. Agroforestry is the pathway to sustainable agriculture and food security. I am therefore happy that the present bulletin on agroforestry technologies for different climatic zones of India prepared by Dr O. P. Chaturvedi and his colleagues has brought together a summary of the work done under the coordinated project on agroforestry. We owe a deep debt of gratitude to the authors for their labour of love for the science and practice of agroforestry. M. S. SWAMINATHAN Agroforestry Technologies for Different Agro-climatic Zones of the Country iii Preamble The All India Coordinated Research Project on Agroforestry (AICRP on AF) initiated by ICAR in 1983 is one of the largest network projects under NARS. Over the period of time project completed diagnostic and design survey of existing agroforestry systems and farmers preferences; evaluation of MPTS and development of agroforestry systems for different agroclimatic regions and initiated work on biofuel and bioenergy. Keeping in view the present day challenges, the project is now focusing on role of agroforestry in meeting the environmental challenges, value addition for creating livelihood opportunities and application of modern tools and technologies in agroforestry research. A number of agroforestry systems and technologies have been developed over the period of time by the coordinating centers of the Project. The present bulletin is an attempt to compile the information on agroforestry technologies which can be taken up by farmers and other stake holders for increasing overall productivity and return and ensuring natural resource conservation. We gracefully acknowledge the valuable guidance and financial support received from Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for the implementation of the project. The input provided by the scientists from coordinating centres of the Project for this bulletin is duly acknowledged. We hope that this bulletin will be of great value to all concerned and will help particularly the small and marginal farmers in adoption of agroforestry in a big way. O. P. Chaturvedi A. K. Sikka A. K. Handa C. K. Bajpai Agroforestry Technologies for Different Agro-climatic Zones of the Country v Contents Sl.No. Content Page No. 1. Preface 2. Preamble 3. Agroforestry Technologies 3.1 HIMALAYAN REGION 3.1.1 Dr. YSPUH & F, Solan (Himachal Pradesh) 1 3.1.1.1 Vegetable based Agri-silviculture system in sub temperate rainfed region of Himachal Pradesh 1 3.1.2 SKUAS&T, Srinagar (Jammu & Kashmir) 3 3.1.2.1 Alley cropping system integrating Elm (Ulmus wallichiana) with kharif and rabi crops in Kashmir valley. 3 3.1.2.2 Apple based Horti-agri-pasture system under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley 5 3.1.3 HRS, AAU, Kahikuchi (Assam) 7 3.1.3.1 Coconut based Horti - Agrisystem in eastern Himalayas (a) 7 3.1.3.2 Coconut-based Horti - Agrisystem in eastern Himalayas (b) 9 3.1.3.3 Gmelina arborea based agroforestry system 11 3.1.3.4 Jackfruit based agroforestry system 12 3.1.3.5 Tree crops interaction studies in Acacia mangium based agri silvicultural system in Assam 14 3.1.4 CSKHPKV, Palampur (Himachal Pradesh) 16 3.1.4.1 Morus based silvi-pastoral system in mid-hills of North Western Himalaya 16 3.1.4.2 Participatory mapping technique to analyze farmers’ perception in adoption of an agroforestry tree. 18 3.2 INDO-GANGETIC REGION 3.2.1 PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab) 23 3.2.1.1 Poplar based agroforestry system (poplar + summer and winter intercrops) 23 3.2.1.2 Raising clonal eucalyptus plantations for higher productivity 25 Agroforestry Technologies for Different Agro-climatic Zones of the Country vii 3.2.2 GBPUA&T, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand) 27 3.2.2.1 Bamboo based agri-silvicultural system for tarai and N-W Himalaya region of Uttarakhand. 27 3.2.2.2 Poplar based agrisilviculture system in Uttarakhand 29 3.2.2.3 Eucalyptus based agrisilviculture system in Uttarakhand 31 3.2.2.4 High density short rotation plantation of poplar and eucalyptus for N-W plain zone. 33 3.2.3 RAU, Pusa Samastipur (Bihar) 35 3.2.3.1 Poplar (Populus deltoides) based agri-silvicultural system in North Western alluvial plain of Bihar 35 3.2.3.2 Aonla (Emblica officinalis) based agri-horticultural system in North Western alluvial plain of Bihar 37 3.2.3.3 Litchi (Litchi chinensis) based agri-horticultural system in North Western alluvial plain of Bihar 39 3.2.4 NDUA&T, Faizabad (Uttar Pradesh) 42 3.2.4.1 Agri silvihorticulture system for sodic land. 42 3.2.4.2 Casuarina equisetifolia and D. sissoo based agri-silviculture system. 44 3.2.4.3 Dalbergia sissoo based silvi-pastoral system on sodic land. 46 3.3 HUMID & SUB-HUMID REGION 3.3.1 BCKVV, Jhargram, (West Bengal) 51 3.3.1.1 Mango + Eucalyptus (E.tereticornis) based agri-horti-silvi system in Red and Laterite Zone of West Bengal 51 3.3.1.2 Mango + Gamhar (Gmelina arborea) based agri-horti-silvi system in Red and Laterite Zone of West Bengal 53 3.3.1.3 Mango + Dysoxylum binectariferum as boundary plantation based agri-horti silvi system in new Alluvial Zone of West Bengal 55 3.3.1.4 Guava based agri-horti system in new Alluvial Zone of West Bengal 57 3.3.1.5 Ber based agri-horti system in new Alluvial Zone of West Bengal 59 3.3.1.6 Agrisilviculture system for new Alluvial Zone of West Bengal 61 3.3.1.7 Homestead Agroforestry in West Bengal 63 viii AICRP on AF, ICAR-CAFRI, Jhansi - 284003 (U.P.) 3.3.2 OUAT, Bhubaneswar (Odisha) 65 3.3.2.1 Acacia mangium based agri-silvicultural system 65 3.3.3 BAU, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 67 3.3.3.1 Gmelina based agroforestry system 67 3.3.3.2 Cassia siamia based agrisilvicultural system 69 3.3.3.3 Subabool based agrisilvicultural system 70 3.3.3.4 Bamboo based agroforestry system 72 3.4 ARID & SEMI-ARID REGION 3.4.1 SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat) 77 3.4.1.1 Ailanthus excelsa based agrisilviculture system under rainfed conditions of North Gujarat. 77 3.4.1.2 Aonla based agroforestry (rainfed green gram-cluster bean in rotation) system with moisture conservation technique. 79 3.4.1.3 Acacia senegal as a bio-fence under arid / semi arid conditions. 81 3.4.1.4 Promising MPTs Neem under rainfed conditions. 83 3.4.2 ARS, SKNAU, Fatehpur-Shekhawati (Rajasthan) 85 3.4.2.1 Dichrostachys cinerea (nutans) based silvipasture model for degraded wasteland or pasture land 85 3.4.2.2 Aonla based agri-horti model 87 3.4.3 CCSHAU, Hisar (Haryana) 89 3.4.3.1 Poplar based agroforestry system in Haryana 89 3.4.4 MPKVV, Rahuri (Maharashtra) 92 3.4.4.1 Eucalyptus plantation in shallow soils of Western Maharashtra 92 3.4.5 COA, PDKV, Nagpur (Maharashtra) 94 3.4.5.1 Design and fabrication of eco-friendly bamboo tree guards for plant protection and employment generation in rural area. 94 3.4.5.2 Standardization of fertilizer requirement for higher production of bamboo. 96 3.4.5.3 Teak based agroforestry system. 97 3.4.5.4 Cultivation of eucalyptus for production of poles. 98 3.4.5.5 Teak clone suitable for the region. 99 Agroforestry Technologies for Different Agro-climatic Zones of the Country ix 3.4.5.6 Silvipasture development 101 3.4.5.7 Teak based agrislviculture system for wasteland afforestation. 102 3.4.5.8 Construction of gabion check dam with clay blanketing for storage of run off and control of gully erosion. 103 3.4.5.9 Vegetative contour bunds for water conservation and for increased productivity of teak plantation. 105 3.4.6 PJTSAU, Hyderabad (Telangana) 107 3.4.6.1 High azadiractin neem line suitable for semi- arid condition. 107 3.4.6.2 Tamarind based agrihorticulture system for improving sustainability in semi-arid area. 108 3.4.6.3 Land utilization in tamarind plantation with economically important plants. 110 3.4.6.4 Performance of medicinal herbs and trees in silvi medicinal system for eco-restoration of degraded lands. 111 3.4.6.5 Production potential of rainfed castor with INM practices in pongamia based agri silvi culture system. 113 3.4.6.6 Performance of rabi sweet sorghum in pongamia based agri-silvi culture in red sandy loam soil. 115 3.4.6.7 Nutrient management of pearl millet in pongamia based agri-silvi culture in marginal lands. 117 3.4.6.8 Response of finger millet to nutrient management in Melia azaderach based agri silvi system in marginal lands. 119 3.4.7 JNKVV, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) 121 3.4.7.1 Eucalyptus based Agri-silviculture system 121 3.4.7.2 Guava based Agri-horticulture system in central India (Kymore plateau) 124 3.4.7.3 Aonla-Bael based horti-medicinal system in central India (Kymore plateau) 126 3.4.7.4 Dalbergia sissoo + paddy-wheat based Agri-silviculture System 128 3.5 TROPICAL REGION 3.5.1 UAS, Dharwad (Karnataka) 133 3.5.1.1 Sapota - teak based agroforestry system for hill zone of Karnataka 133 3.5.1.2 Teak based agroforestry system 135 3.5.1.3 Horti-silvi pastural system under degraded soils 137 3.5.1.4 Melia (Melia azadirach) based agroforestry system 139 x AICRP on AF, ICAR-CAFRI, Jhansi - 284003 (U.P.) 3.5.2 FCRI, TNAU, Mettupalayam (Tamil Nadu) 141 3.5.2.1 Multifunctional agroforestry technology for adoption by farmers 141 3.5.3 KAU, Thrissur (Kerala) 144 3.5.3.1 Multipurpose trees based black pepper production system for humid tropics 144 3.5.3.2 Homestead based intensive silvopasture system in humid tropics of Kerala 147 3.5.3.3 Calliandra and mulberry based hedge row fodder production systems in coconut gardens of Kerala 149 3.5.4 Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Balancing Natural and Agricultural Systems in the Atlantic Rainforest of Brazil
    Institut für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften und Ressourcenschutz der Rheinischen Friedrich- Wilhelms- Universität Bonn BALANCING NATURAL AND AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS IN THE ATLANTIC RAINFOREST OF BRAZIL Inaugural-Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Agrarwissenschaften (Dr. Agr.) der Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät Der Rheinischen Friederich- Wilhelms- Universität Zu Bonn Vorgelegt am 06.10.2006 Von Juan Carlos TORRICO ALBINO Aus Cochabamba- Bolivien Referent: Prof. Dr. M.J.J. Janssens Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Heiner E. Goldbach Diese Dissertation ist auf dem Hochschulschriftenserver der ULB Bonn http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online elektronisch publiziert D 98 Tag der Mündlichen Prüfung: 15.12.2006 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS Deseo expresar mi más profundo agradecimiento a las siguientes personas que hicieron posible la realización y culminación de este trabajo. En Primer lugar al Prof. Dr. Marc Janssens, por haber sido más que mi primer supervisor, por haberme enseñado el camino de la ciencia y a la vez impartido valiosas lecciones de vida, por haberme allanado el camino en momentos difíciles, por sus ideas visionarias y por su gran paciencia en la conducción y corrección de esta tesis. Un especial agradecimiento a su esposa Frau Janssens por su apoyo moral y por inyectar energía positiva en mi familia. Al Prof. Dr. Heiner Goldbach, mi segundo supervisor por las correcciones y el valioso aporte científico. Al Prof. Dr. Jürgen Pohlan, por sus valiosos consejos, y por ser un ejemplo de profesionalismo. Muy especialmente al Prof. Dr. Hartmut Gaese, en primer lugar por su amistad, por haber hecho posible la realización de este trabajo a través del proyecto BLUMEN , por haberme brindado su apoyo científico y humano, por los valiosos consejos, discusiones, por los gratos momentos en campo, y finalmente por apoyar a mi familia.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisons of Mayan Forest Management, Restoration, and Conservation
    Forest Ecology and Management 261 (2011) 1696–1705 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Comparisons of Mayan forest management, restoration, and conservation Stewart A.W. Diemont a,b,∗, Jessica L. Bohn a, Donald D. Rayome a, Sarah J. Kelsen a, Kaity Cheng c a Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, 402 Baker Lab, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA b Department of Agroecology, El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur S/N, Maria Auxiliadora San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico c Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, 402 Baker Lab, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA article info abstract Article history: Numerous communities associated with at least five distinct ethnic Mayan groups in southern Mexico Received 6 May 2010 and Central America continue to rely upon forested areas as integral components of their agricultural Received in revised form 16 October 2010 systems. They carefully manage these areas so that forests provide food, raw materials, and animals. Man- Accepted 7 November 2010 agement practices include removing and planting of woody and herbaceous species, apiculture, and seed Available online 7 December 2010 harvest. Mayan agroforestry systems in geographically and ecologically distinct areas of Mesoamerica were evaluated to better understand traditional agroforestry system components and how indigenous Keywords: Mayan agroforestry could be a part of regional forest conservation and restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation
    sustainability Article The Method and Model of Ecological Technology Evaluation Xiaoning Hu 1, Meizi Si 2, Han Luo 3 , Mancai Guo 1,* and Jijun Wang 3 1 College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] 2 College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] 3 Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China; [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (J.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-029-8709-2298 Received: 11 January 2019; Accepted: 5 February 2019; Published: 8 February 2019 Abstract: In order to evaluate ecological technology scientifically, we constructed a modular “three-stage evaluation method” based on qualitative evaluation, semiquantitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation, and established the theoretical models of the four kinds of ecotechnology, such as soil and water conservation technology, desertification governance technology, rocky desertification governance technology and ecological restoration technology. We gave the quantification criteria of the first-level and second-level index commonly shared by four kinds of ecotechnology and defined the quantification criteria of the third-level index of reflecting the heterogeneity of soil and water conservation technology. An ecotechnology evaluation model combining Analytic Hierarchy Process and Logistic regression was established based on soil and water conservation technology. The rationality of the evaluation method and model were verified by field investigation data of soil and water conservation technology in Gaoxigou. The evaluation method and model could provide scientific basis for the effective introduction and popularization of ecotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Antifragility: Beyond Integrity and Resilience
    Ecosystem antifragility: beyond integrity and resilience Miguel Equihua1, Mariana Espinosa Aldama2, Carlos Gershenson3,4,5, Oliver López-Corona1,4,6, Mariana Munguía7, Octavio Pérez-Maqueo1 and Elvia Ramírez-Carrillo8 1 Red Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México 2 Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, UAM-Cuajimalpa., CDMX, México 3 IIMAS, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México 4 Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad (C3), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México 5 ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia 6 Cátedras CONACyT, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), CDMX, México 7 Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), CDMX, México 8 Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México ABSTRACT We review the concept of ecosystem resilience in its relation to ecosystem integrity from an information theory approach. We summarize the literature on the subject identifying three main narratives: ecosystem properties that enable them to be more resilient; ecosystem response to perturbations; and complexity. We also include original ideas with theoretical and quantitative developments with application examples. The main contribution is a new way to rethink resilience, that is mathematically formal and easy to evaluate heuristically in real-world applications: ecosystem antifragility. An ecosystem is antifragile if it benefits from environmental variability. Antifragility therefore
    [Show full text]
  • Closed Ecological Systems, Space Life Support and Biospherics
    11 Closed Ecological Systems, Space Life Support and Biospherics Mark Nelson, Nickolay S. Pechurkin, John P. Allen, Lydia A Somova, and Josef I. Gitelson CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TERMINOLOGY OF CLOSED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS:FROM LABORATORY ECOSPHERES TO MANMADE BIOSPHERES DIFFERENT TYPES OF CLOSED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS CONCLUSION REFERENCES Abstract This chapter explores the development of a new type of scientific tool – man- made closed ecological systems. These systems have had a number of applications within the past 50 years. They are unique tools for investigating fundamental processes and interactions of ecosystems. They also hold the potentiality for creating life support systems for space exploration and habitation outside of Earth’s biosphere. Finally, they are an experimental method of working with small “biospheric systems” to gain insight into the functioning of Earth’s biosphere. The chapter reviews the terminology of the field, the history and current work on closed ecological systems, bioregenerative space life support and biospherics in Japan, Europe, Russia, and the United States where they have been most developed. These projects include the Bios experiments in Russia, the Closed Ecological Experiment Facility in Japan, the Biosphere 2 project in Arizona, the MELiSSA program of the European Space Agency as well as fundamental work in the field by NASA and other space agencies. The challenges of achieving full closure, and of recycling air and water and producing high- production crops for such systems are discussed, with examples of different approaches being used to solve these problems. The implications for creating sustainable technologies for our Earth’s environment are also illustrated. Key Words Life support r biospherics r bioregenerative r food r air r water recycling r microcosm rclosed ecological systems rBios rNASA rCEEF rBiosphere 2 rBIO-Plex.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Buffers ___An Annotated Bibliography
    Wetland Buffers ____________ An Annotated Bibliography February 1992 Publication #92-11 printed on recycled paper For additional copies of this document, contact: Department of Ecology Publications Distribution Office PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 (360) 407-7472 Ecology is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employer and shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, religion or disability as defined by applicable state and/or federal regulations or statutes. If you have special accommodation needs, contact TDD# 360/407- 6006. Wetlands Buffers: An Annotated Bibliography edited by Andrew J. Castelle, Catherine Conolly, Michael Emers (Adolfson Associates, Inc., Edmonds, WA) Eric D. Metz, Susan Meyer and Michael Witter (W & H Pacific, Inc., Bellevue, WA) for Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington February 1992 Ecology Publication #92-11 INTRODUCTION Wetland Buffers: An Annotated Bibliography is a compilation of abstracts dealing with the use of vegetated "buffer zones" to reduce the impact of adjacent land use on wetland ecosystems. Most of the entries in this document come from journal articles published in diverse fields: agriculture, engineering, fisheries, forestry, geology, landscape architecture, marine sciences, resource management, and wildlife biology. The bibliography also contains summaries of government publications from the federal, state, and local levels, including government-funded research, guidance documents, and adopted or proposed wetlands conservation ordinances. Also included are summaries of symposia presentations. OBJECTIVE The objective was to create a compilation of citations which analyze the functional requirements, composition, uses, effectiveness, or delineation of wetland buffer areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works
    Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works A Practical Set of Ecological Engineering Principles for Road Infrastructure and Coastal Management H.D. van Bohemen Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works A Practical Set of Ecological Engineering Principles for Road Infrastructure and Coastal Management H.D. van Bohemen Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works 1 Versie7.pmd 1 13-4-2004, 11:32 Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works 2 Versie7.pmd 2 13-4-2004, 11:32 Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works A Practical Set of Ecological Engineering Principles for Road Infrastructure and Coastal Management Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works 3 Versie7.pmd 3 13-4-2004, 11:32 Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works 4 Versie7.pmd 4 13-4-2004, 11:32 Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works A Practical Set of Ecological Engineering Principles for Road Infrastructure and Coastal Management Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. ir. J.T. Fokkema, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 18 mei 2004 om 15.30 uur door Heinrich Diederik van BOHEMEN doctorandus biologie geboren te ‘s-Gravenhage Ecological Engineering and Civil Engineering Works 5 Versie7.pmd 5 13-4-2004, 11:32 Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. Ch.F. Hendriks Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus Voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. Ch. F. Hendriks Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Prof. dr. F.M. Sanders Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. P. Zonderwijk Wageningen Universiteit, emeritus Prof. dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing an Ecological Engineering Curriculum
    Session 3151 Developing an Ecological Engineering Curriculum Scott D. Bergen, Susan M. Bolton, James L. Fridley University of Washington Abstract This paper describes efforts to develop an Ecological Engineering curriculum at the University of Washington. Ecological engineering is the design of sustainable systems consistent with ecological principles that integrate human society with its natural environment for the benefit of both. Graduates will be able to practice design with an appreciation for the relationship of organisms (including humans) with their environment, and the constraints on design imposed by the complexity, variability and uncertainty inherent to natural systems. Students educated as ecological engineers will be prepared to work on pressing environmental problems such as: 1. The design of ecological systems (ecotechnology) as an alternative to man- made/energy intensive systems to meet various human needs (for example, constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment). 2. The restoration of damaged ecosystems and the mitigation of development activities. 3. The management, utilization, and conservation of natural resources. 4. The integration of society and ecosystems in built environments (for example, in landscape architecture, urban planning, and urban horticulture applications). We discuss our concept of the definition and scope of ecological engineering, and the knowledge areas and skills that could be included in a university curricula. Specific attention is given to the principles of ecology that will influence ecological engineering design practice. We also note organizational challenges posed by working with faculty and administration from many disciplines, attracting students, research funding and external partnerships, and seeking ABET accreditation. Introduction The emerging practice of ecological engineering grows out of the failure of past engineering practice to provide for human welfare while at the same time protecting the natural environment from which goods and services are drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining Ecological Engineering to Promote Its Integration with Sustainable Development and Tighten Its Links with the Whole of Ecology F
    Redefining ecological engineering to promote its integration with sustainable development and tighten its links with the whole of ecology F. Gosselin To cite this version: F. Gosselin. Redefining ecological engineering to promote its integration with sustainable development and tighten its links with the whole of ecology. Ecological Engineering, Elsevier, 2008, 32 (3), p. 199 - p. 205. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.007. hal-00453899 HAL Id: hal-00453899 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00453899 Submitted on 5 Feb 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Redefining ecological engineering to promote its integration with sustainable development and tighten its links with the whole of ecology Frédéric Gosselin Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Engineering Research (Cemagref), URE Ecosystèmes Forestiers, Domaine des Barres, 45290 Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France. E- mail: [email protected] Fax: 00 33 238 95 03 44, Tel: 00 33 238 95 03 58 Published in "Ecological Engineering", vol. 32, n°3, pp.199-205 (doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.007). Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VFB-4RTKXF4- 1&_user=5403736&_coverDate=03%2F03%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_ srch=doc- info(%23toc%236006%232008%23999679996%23680290%23FLA%23display%23Volume) &_cdi=6006&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=12&_acct=C000037979&_version=1&_urlVersio n=0&_userid=5403736&md5=6623ff006a283bc44c150fd67449c788 1 Abstract Ecological engineering was defined several decades ago, both in the academic field and in management.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of the Miyawaki Method in Mediterranean Forest Restoration Programs
    Landscape Ecol Eng (2011) 7:81–92 DOI 10.1007/s11355-010-0117-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Effectiveness of the Miyawaki method in Mediterranean forest restoration programs Bartolomeo Schirone • Antonello Salis • Federico Vessella Received: 26 January 2010 / Revised: 18 May 2010 / Accepted: 18 May 2010 / Published online: 17 June 2010 Ó International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2010 Abstract In the 1980s, Professor Akira Miyawaki intro- foresters and ecological engineering experts for Mediter- duced a new and innovative reforestation approach in ranean environmental reforestation program. Japan with the challenge to restore indigenous ecosystems, and maintaining global environments, including disaster Keywords Ecological restoration Á prevention and carbon dioxide (CO2) mitigation. Here, Potential natural vegetation Á Ecotechnology Á natural vegetation successional stages (from bare soil to Reforestation practices comparison Á mature forest) are practically forced and reproduced, Mediterranean environment accelerating natural successional times. The Miyawaki method has been applied in the Far East, Malaysia, and South America; results have been very impressive, allow- Introduction ing quick environmental restorations of strongly degraded areas. However, these applications have always been made Global climatic changes, together with recent rapid on sites characterized by high precipitation. The same urbanization and industrialization, have been the main method has never been used in a Mediterranean context anthropogenic effects worldwide in destroying natural distinguished by summer aridity and risk of desertification. environments and increasing risk of desertification. They A first test was carried out by the University of Tuscia, suggest the need for performing more environmental con- Department of Forest and Environment (DAF), 11 years servation activity, as well as using innovative environ- ago in Sardinia (Italy) on an area where traditional refor- mental recovery activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotechnologies
    Freshwater Management Series No. 7 Phytotechnologies A Technical Approach in Environmental Management The purpose of this publication is to provide a conceptual overview of phytotechnologies and their importance in relation to various environmental problems and potential solutions. Although it does not address all aspects of phytotechnology, it does provide the basis of a conceptual framework for understanding the importance of ecosystems approaches in helping to achieve sustainable development objectives. It also examines the role of phytotechnology in relation to some key issues including integrated water resources management, urban environmental management, biodiversity and climate change. (Webmaster's note: The glossary may be accessed by clicking the corresponding vocabulary set in blue type). PREFACE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION – AN ECOSYSTEM'S PERSPECTIVE Introduction A. Environmentally Sound Technologies B. Ecological Engineering and Ecotechnologies C. Phytotechnology D. UNEP’s Interest in Phytotechnology II. GLOBAL ISSUES REQUIRING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Introduction A. Biodiversity and the Biodiversity Convention B. Biotechnology and the Biosafety Protocol C. Integrated Water Resources Management and Ecohydrology D. Cities as Sustainable Ecosystems E. Climate Change F. Valuation of Ecological Services and Natural Capital III. EXAMPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS OF PHYTOTECHNOLOGY Introduction A. Ecotone Protection and Augmentation B. Natural Wetlands C. Constructed Wetlands D. Floating Macrophytes and Root Zone Plants for Improving Water Quality E. Combined Waste Stabilisation Ponds and Wetlands F Use of Plantations for Wastewater Treatment G. Use of Floodlands for Water Quality Improvement and Eutrophication Control H. Phytoremediation I. Forestry and Agriculture J. Bio-Energy IV. IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF PHYTOTECHNOLOGIES Introduction A. Site Characterization B. Plant Selection C. Modelling D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration
    EcologicalEcological EngineeringEngineering andand EcosystemEcosystem RestorationRestoration History,History, definitions,definitions, andand principlesprinciples William J. Mitsch Professor of Natural Resources and Environmental Science Director, Olentangy River Wetland Research Park The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio USA 2004 Everglades Restoration, Florida Historic Current Restoration Conditions Flow Plan Everglades Restoration, Florida Delta Restoration, Louisiana Mississippi River Basin Restoration, USA created wetland restored intercepting bottomland tile drainage forest River Channel Restoration, Skern River Denmark River Channel Restoration, Skern River Denmark Wetland Creation/ Restoration Columbus, Ohio 6.1 ha mitigation wetland Olentangy River Wetland Research Park Columbus, Ohio 12-ha wetland research facility on Ohio State University campus Olentangy River Wetland Research Park Columbus, Ohio Floodplain Forest Restoration Treatment Wetland, Central Ohio Salt Marsh Restoration, New Jersey Salt Marsh Restoration, New Jersey Biosphere 2, Arizona Biosphere 2, Arizona Change in population 1805-1999 and an op- timistic (but realistic) prognosis 1999-2050 10 ns) lio 8 (bil 6 4 2 Human population 0 1800 1900 2000 2100 Year 100 Global Nitrogen Fixation 80 60 Percent Change 40 Atmospheric CO 20 2 0 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Year HistoryHistory ofof EcologicalEcological EngineeringEngineering H.T. Odum (1960s) mention of ecological eengineerngineering in several publications Ma Shijun (1960s-70s in China; 1985 in Western
    [Show full text]