I4020 If... (Great Britain, 1968)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I4020 If... (Great Britain, 1968) I4020 IF... (GREAT BRITAIN, 1968) Credits: director, Lindsay Anderson ; writer, David Sherwin. Cast: Malcolm McDowell, David Wood, Richard Warwick, Christine Noonan. Summary: Melodrama set in a contemporary British boarding school. The students at College House are kept in line by tradition, strict discipline, and prefects until three unruly seniors refuse to conform. They lead a rebellion that turns surreal and violent as the students have their day. Conceived by Anderson in the 1950s but not produced until the late 1960s when international student rebellions had made the concept marketable. Aldgate, Anthony (see under Richards, Jeffrey) Alpert, Hollis. “Fall of the British establishment” Saturday review 52 (Feb 15, 1969), p. 50. Anderson, Lindsay (see under Sherwin, David) Armstrong, Marion. “Bloody rebellion” Christian century 86 (Jul 2, 1969), p. 905-6. Arnold, Gary. “‘If..’: Pop rebellion fantasy, and snob appeal” Washington post (Jun 13, 1969), p. C3. Baker, Russell. “Observer: Youth without rose-colored glasses” New York times (May 13, 1969), p. 46. Barker, Felix. [If...] Evening news [London] (Dec 19, 1968), p. ? Betts, Ernest. The film business : a history of British cinema 1896-1972 London : Allen and Unwin, 1973. (p. 303-6) __________. [If...] People (Dec 22, 1968), p. ? “Biofilmographie--Lindsay Anderson” Avant-scene du cinema 119 (Nov 1971), p. 56. Canby, Vincent. “British film breaks hold on Cannes fete” New York times (May 26, 1969), p. 56. ____________. “Give me back my yo-yo” New York times (Mar 30, 1969), sec. 2, p. 1, 35. ____________. “The importance of being Oscar” New York times (Apr 20, 1969), sec. 2, p. 8D. Cecil, Norman. [If...] Films in review 20/4 (Apr 1969), p. 255-6. Cocks, Jay. “‘If’ does not equal zero” Time 93 (Mar 21, 1969), p. 97. Coleman, John. “Films: Mr. Anderson’s anarchy” New statesman 76 (Dec 20, 1968), p. 882-3. Corliss, Roger. “Hollywood and the student revolt” National review 21 (Jun 17, 1969), p. 606. Cowie, Peter. [If...] International film guide New York : A.S. Barnes, 1964- (1970, p. 106-7). Craddock, John. “‘If...’ high school unless” Film Society review 5/1 (Sep 1969), p. 30-38. Dempsey, Michael. “If...” Film heritage 5/1 (fall 1969), p. 13-20. Dickinson, Thorold. A discovery of cinema London : Oxford Univ. Press, 1971. (p. 138-9) Durgnat, Raymond. “Britannia waives the rules” Film comment 12 (Jul-Aug 1976), p. 50-59. Ebert, Roger. “Students vs. the system in bloody vision” Chicago sun times (Jun 1, 1969), sec. II, p. 5, 8. Faller, Greg S. “If...” International dictionary of films and filmmakers 2nd ed. [GB] (v. 1, p. 406-7) Farber, Stephen. “Before the revolution” Hudson review 22 (autumn 1969), p. 469- 76. Gelmis, Joseph. “Lindsay Anderson” in Film director as superstar Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday. (p. 93-110) Gibbs, Patrick. [If...] Daily telegraph [London] (Dec 20, 1968), p. ? Gladwell, David. “Editing Anderson’s ‘If...’” Screen 10/1 (Jan-Feb 1969), p. 24-33. Gow, Gordon. [If...] Films and filming 15/6 (Mar 1969), p. 50-51. Graham, Allison. Lindsay Anderson Boston : Twayne, 1981. (p. 93-121+) Harmsworth, Madeline. [If...] Sunday mirror (Dec 22, 1968), p. ? Hartung, Philip T. “If youth but knew” Commonweal 90 (Mar 21, 1969), p. 21-22. Hatch, Robert. “Films” Nation 208 (Mar 17, 1969), p. 348-9. Hibbin, Nina. [If...] Morning star [London] (Dec 20, 1968), p. ? Hirschhorn, Clive. [If...] Sunday express [London] (Dec 22, 1968), p. ? Houston, Penelope. “Ifs and buts at Cannes” Spectator 222 (May 30, 1969), p. 728-9. “If...” American Film Institute catalog [GB] (Entry F6.2360) [If...] Close-up [India] 7-8 (1971), p. 54-7. [If...] Film a Doba n.10 (Oct 1985), p. 516-31. [If...] Film daily (Feb 20, 1969), p. 7. “If...” Filmfacts 12/4 (1969), p. 73. [If...] Hollywood reporter (May 28, 1969), p. 3. [If...] Kine weekly n.3193 (Dec 21, 1968), p. 19. [If...] Monthly film bulletin 36/421 (Feb 1969), p. 25-6. “If...” Motion picture guide (edited by Jay Robert Nash and Stanley Ralph Ross) Chicago : Cinebooks, 1985. (v. 4, p. 1355) [If...] Motion picture herald product digest (Feb 5, 1969), p. 109-10. [If...] New society (Dec 19, 1968), p. 923. [If...] Spectator 221 (Dec 20, 1968), p. 884-5. [If...] Times [London] (Dec 19, 1968), p. 14. [If...] Village voice 14 (Mar 20, 1969), p. 43, 52. Jensen, Niels. “Lindsay Anderson--romantisk ironiker” Kosmorama 20 (Nov 1973), p. 43-63. Johnson, Albert. [If...] Film quarterly 22/4 (summer 1969). p. 48-52. Kael, Pauline. “The current cinema: School days, school days” New Yorker 45 (Mar 15, 1969), p. 152, 154, 159-61. [Reprinted in her Going steady Boston : Little, Brown, 1970. (p. 279-86); and in Film 69/70 New York : Simon and Schuster, 1970. (p. 84-90)] Kauffmann, Stanley. [If...] New republic 160 (Feb 15, 1969), p. 22. [Reprinted in his Figures of light New York : Harper & Row, 1971. (p. 134- 6)] Kotlowitz, Robert. “Aspects of love” Harpers 238 (Apr 1969), p. 115-16. Lovell, Alan. “Brecht in Britain--Lindsay Anderson” Screen 16/4 (winter 1975/76), p. 62-80. Manchel, Frank. Film study--A resource guide Cranbury, N.J. : Associated Univ. Presses, 1973. (p. 290-91+) Manvell, Roger. New cinema in Britain London : Studio Vista, 1969. Marszalek, Rafal. “Lindsay Anderson” Kino 9 (Oct 1974), p. 41-8. Millar, Gavin. “If...” Sight and sound 38/1 (winter 1968-69), p. 42-3. Morgenstern, Joseph. “School days” Newsweek 73 (Mar 31, 1969), p. 95-6. Mortimer, Penelope. “Anderson’s masterwork” Observer review (Dec 22, 1968), p. 19. Moskowitz, Gene (Mosk). “If...” Variety Dec11, 1968), p. 30. Pechter, William S. “With-it movies” Commentary 49 (Feb 1970), p. 77-81. Powell, Dilys. “Much virtue in If” Sunday times [London] (Dec 22, 1968), p. 24. Prima, Jesse. [If...] Cineaste 11/4 (spring 1969), p. 19-20. Reif, Tony. [If...] Take one 2/2 (Nov-Dec 1968), p. 21. Rhode, Eric. [If...] Listener 80 (Dec 26, 1968), p. 872-3. Richards, Jeffrey and Aldgate, Anthony. “The revolt of the young: If...” in his British film and society, 1930-1970 Totowa, N.J. : Barnes & Noble Books, 1983. (p. 147-61) Robinson, David. “Anderson shooting ‘If...’” Sight and sound 37/3 (summer 1968), p. 130-31. _____________. [If...] Financial times [London] (Dec 20, 1968), p. ? Roddick, Nick. “If...” Magill’s survey of cinema. English language films, second series Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Salem Press, 1981. (v. 3, p. 1103-6) Roud, Richard. [If...] Guardian [England] (Dec 19, 1968), p. ? Rumalho, Jose Jorge. “Un filme que evoca Jean Vigo” Celuloide 17 (Nov 1974), p. 29-30. Schickel, Richard. “Angry knot in the old school tie” Life 66 (Feb 28, 1969), p. 8. [Reprinted in his Second sight : notes on some movies, 1965-1970 New York : Simon and Schuster, 1972. (p. 220-22)] Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr. “‘If...’: Brilliant disturbing” Vogue 153 (Mar 15, 1969), p. 40. Schrader, Paul. [If] Cinema 5/3 (1968), p. 46-7. Shalit, Gene. “Go!--For the fury, force, and fun of ‘If...’” Look 33 (Mar 18, 1969), p. 84. _________. [If...] Ladies home journal 86/4 (Apr 1969), p. 12. Sherwin, David and Anderson, Lindsay. If... : a film by Lindsay Anderson and David Sherwin New York : Simon and Schuster, 1969. Shivas, Mark. [If...] Movie 16 (winter 1968-69), p. 39. Silet, Charles L. P. Lindsay Anderson : a guide to references and resources Boston : G.K. Hall, 1979. (p. 53-58+) Simon, John. Movies into film New York : Dial Press, 1971. (p. 109-10) Skorman, Richard. “If...” in his Off-Hollywood movies : the film lover’s guide New York : Harmony Books, 1989. (p. 78-9) Slide, Anthony. Fifty classic British films, 1932-1982 : a pictorial record New York : Dover, 1985. (p. 127-9) Spiers, David. [If...] Screen 10/2 (Mar-Apr 1969), p. 85-9. Sussex, Elizabeth. Lindsay Anderson New York : Praeger, 1969. _____________. “Lindsay Anderson’s new film” Times [London] (Nov 29, 1968), p. 14. Taylor, John Russell. Directors and directions : cinema for the seventies New York : Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, 1975. (p. 91-5) ________________. [If...] Times [London] (Dec 20, 1968), p. ? Walker, Alexander. Hollywood, England : the British film industry in the sixties London : Joseph, 1974. [Reissued, as Hollywood, UK : the British film industry in the sixties New York : Stein and Day, 1974; and under original title, London : Harrap, 1986] Walsh, Michael. [If...] Daily express [London] (Dec 19, 1968), p. ? Walsh, Moira. “Films: British schools” America 120/11 (Mar 15, 1969), p. 313-15. Weldon, Michael. The psychotronic video guide New York : St. Martin’s Griffin, 1996. (p. 282) Welsh, James E. “Bergman and Anderson for sophomores” Cinema journal 11/1 (fall 1971), p. 52-7. Willis, John. “‘If...’” in Screen world New York : Crown, 1970. (p. 154-5) Young, Vernon. “Film chronicle: Notes on the compulsive revolution” Hudson review 22 (winter 1969), p. 649-50. [Reprinted in On film : essays on a popular art New York : Quadrangle, 1972. (p. 350-51)] .
Recommended publications
  • Models of Time Travel
    MODELS OF TIME TRAVEL A COMPARATIVE STUDY USING FILMS Guy Roland Micklethwait A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University July 2012 National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science ANU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences APPENDIX I: FILMS REVIEWED Each of the following film reviews has been reduced to two pages. The first page of each of each review is objective; it includes factual information about the film and a synopsis not of the plot, but of how temporal phenomena were treated in the plot. The second page of the review is subjective; it includes the genre where I placed the film, my general comments and then a brief discussion about which model of time I felt was being used and why. It finishes with a diagrammatic representation of the timeline used in the film. Note that if a film has only one diagram, it is because the different journeys are using the same model of time in the same way. Sometimes several journeys are made. The present moment on any timeline is always taken at the start point of the first time travel journey, which is placed at the origin of the graph. The blue lines with arrows show where the time traveller’s trip began and ended. They can also be used to show how information is transmitted from one point on the timeline to another. When choosing a model of time for a particular film, I am not looking at what happened in the plot, but rather the type of timeline used in the film to describe the possible outcomes, as opposed to what happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Haunting
    The Independent Voice of Salt Lake Community College FREE Wednesday october 31, 2012 THE Issue 12/ fall '12 GLOBEVisit us online at globeslcc.com Inside: your Globe Halloween hookup - Masks for the Lazy pg. 5 GRAND Visit HAUNTING www. Photo by Trisha Gold globeslcc.com South City theatre a Unexplained events have been known to happen at the Grand Theatre. major controversy when the high anything,” said Rufendr. “There for daily news hotspot for ghostly school closed in 1988, and many are some seats that people won’t sit alumni were heartbroken by the in. When we asked them why, they updates shenanigans decision. have no answer for it. They just In 1992, SLCC finishedwon’t sit there.” Kachina Choate began about five or six years converting the building into the Theater productions create a Staff Reporter ago. Most of the occurrences are college’s new South City Campus lot of energy, and according to reported to have happened in the after years of renovation. paranormal professionals there The “break a leg” phrase is widely theatre’s house. There have been “There are always stories of the are many reasons why places have known as a safe way to wish luck to no backstage sightings, but actors old students who have come back ghosts. an actor, and theatre professionals have reported odd things happing, from the former South High,” “Maybe [the ghost] had some and patrons are commonly known such as a switch suddenly turning Rufendr. “There is a boy and a special connection to [the Grand] as a superstitious lot.
    [Show full text]
  • From Free Cinema to British New Wave: a Story of Angry Young Men
    SUPLEMENTO Ideas, I, 1 (2020) 51 From Free Cinema to British New Wave: A Story of Angry Young Men Diego Brodersen* Introduction In February 1956, a group of young film-makers premiered a programme of three documentary films at the National Film Theatre (now the BFI Southbank). Lorenza Mazzetti, Lindsay Anderson, Karel Reisz and Tony Richardson thought at the time that “no film can be too personal”, and vehemently said so in their brief but potent manifesto about Free Cinema. Their documentaries were not only personal, but aimed to show the real working class people in Britain, blending the realistic with the poetic. Three of them would establish themselves as some of the most inventive and irreverent British filmmakers of the 60s, creating iconoclastic works –both in subject matter and in form– such as Saturday Day and Sunday Morning, The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner and If… Those were the first significant steps of a New British Cinema. They were the Big Screen’s angry young men. What is British cinema? In my opinion, it means many different things. National cinemas are much more than only one idea. I would like to begin this presentation with this question because there have been different genres and types of films in British cinema since the beginning. So, for example, there was a kind of cinema that was very successful, not only in Britain but also in America: the films of the British Empire, the films about the Empire abroad, set in faraway places like India or Egypt. Such films celebrated the glory of the British Empire when the British Empire was almost ending.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport, Life, This Sporting Life, and the Hypertopia
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Sport, life, This Sporting Life, and the hypertopia AUTHORS Ewers, C JOURNAL Textual Practice DEPOSITED IN ORE 11 May 2021 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125641 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Textual Practice ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rtpr20 Sport, life, This Sporting Life, and the hypertopia Chris Ewers To cite this article: Chris Ewers (2021): Sport, life, ThisSportingLife, and the hypertopia, Textual Practice, DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1900366 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1900366 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 16 Mar 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 50 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rtpr20 TEXTUAL PRACTICE https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1900366 Sport, life, This Sporting Life, and the hypertopia Chris Ewers English Literature and Film, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK ABSTRACT Sport has classically been regarded as an ‘elsewhere’, a leisure activity set apart from the serious business of life. Sociological critiques of sport, however, emphasise its importance in transmitting ideology, and its responsiveness to historical change. The question, then, is how does this ‘elsewhere’ connect to the everyday? The article proposes that the spaces of sport generally function as a hypertopia, which involves a going beyond of the normative, rather than the Foucauldian idea of the heterotopia or utopia, which foreground difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Bafta Los Angeles
    Sponsorship Opportunities BAFTA LOS ANGELES THE BRITISH ACADEMY OF FILM AND TELEVISION ARTS SUPPORTS, DEVELOPS AND PROMOTES THE ART FORMS OF THE MOVING IMAGE BY IDENTIFYING AND REWARDING EXCELLENCE, INSPIRING PRACTITIONERS AND BENEFITING THE PUBLIC. As the only Anglo-American professional organization founded to promote and advance original work in film, television and interactive media, The British Academy of Film and Television Arts Los Angeles serves as a link between the Hollywood and British production and entertainment business communities. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ A California non-profit public benefit corporation, BAFTA Los Angeles is a local organization with a global reach. As the L.A. branch of the British Academy of Film and Television Arts, headquartered in London, we represent not only our 1,200 members, but the full 6,500 Academy members based in the United Kingdom, New York and Los Angeles. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Membership in the Academy is both highly sought after and highly exclusive – applicants must be proposed and seconded by existing Academy members and thus represent the very top professionals in their various fields; from award winning writers, actors and directors, to key managers, network and studio executives and agents. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ We host stellar parties and awards
    [Show full text]
  • THE Permanent Crisis of FILM Criticism
    mattias FILM THEORY FILM THEORY the PermaNENT Crisis of IN MEDIA HISTORY IN MEDIA HISTORY film CritiCism frey the ANXiety of AUthority mattias frey Film criticism is in crisis. Dwelling on the Kingdom, and the United States to dem­ the many film journalists made redundant at onstrate that film criticism has, since its P newspapers, magazines, and other “old origins, always found itself in crisis. The erma media” in past years, commentators need to assert critical authority and have voiced existential questions about anxieties over challenges to that author­ N E the purpose and worth of the profession ity are longstanding concerns; indeed, N T in the age of WordPress blogospheres these issues have animated and choreo­ C and proclaimed the “death of the critic.” graphed the trajectory of international risis Bemoaning the current anarchy of inter­ film criticism since its origins. net amateurs and the lack of authorita­ of tive critics, many journalists and acade­ Mattias Frey is Senior Lecturer in Film at film mics claim that in the digital age, cultural the University of Kent, author of Postwall commentary has become dumbed down German Cinema: History, Film History, C and fragmented into niche markets. and Cinephilia, co­editor of Cine-Ethics: riti Arguing against these claims, this book Ethical Dimensions of Film Theory, Prac- C examines the history of film critical dis­ tice, and Spectatorship, and editor of the ism course in France, Germany, the United journal Film Studies. AUP.nl 9789089647177 9789089648167 The Permanent Crisis of Film Criticism Film Theory in Media History explores the epistemological and theoretical founda- tions of the study of film through texts by classical authors as well as anthologies and monographs on key issues and developments in film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Working Classes in British Feature Film from the 1960S to the 1980S: from Class Consciousness to Marginalization
    An Overview of the Working Classes in British Feature Film from the 1960s to the 1980s: From Class Consciousness to Marginalization Stephen C. Shafer University of Illinois Abstract The portrayal of the working classes has always been an element of British popular film from the comic music hall stereotypes in the era of Gracie Fields and George Formby in the 1930s to the more gritty realism of the “Angry Young Man” films that emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. Curiously, in the last thirty years, the portrayal of the working classes in popular film has become somewhat less sharply drawn and more indistinct. In an odd way, these changes may parallel criticisms directed toward politicians about a declining sense of working-class unity and purpose in the wake of the Margaret Thatcher and post-Thatcher eras. When noted English film director and commentator Lindsay Anderson was asked to contribute an overview article on the British cinema for the 1984 edi- tion of the International Film Guide, he ruefully observed that from the per- spective of 1983 and, indeed, for most of its history, “British Cinema [has been] . a defeated rather than a triumphant cause.”1 Referring to the perennial fi- nancial crises and the smothering effect of Hollywood’s competition and influ- ence, Anderson lamented the inability of British films to find a consistent na- tional film tradition, adding that “the British Cinema has reflected only too clearly a nation lacking in energy and the valuable kind of pride . which cher- ishes its own traditions.”2 In particular, Anderson observed that when, on occa- sion, the British film industry had attempted to address the interests and needs of its working classes, the “aims” of the film-makers “were not supported .
    [Show full text]
  • The Batman Adventures Comic!
    Celebrating Batman: The Animated Series’ 25th Anniversary! September 2017 No.99 $8.95 Harley Quinn history! The Batman Adventures comic! The animated DC Universe in comics! And a tribute to the late, great Mike Parobeck! featuring Altieri • Burchett • Conroy • Dini • Pasko • Sorkin • Strong • Timm & more! 1 82658 00102 5 g y g Volume 1, Number 99 September 2017 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Michael Eury PUBLISHER John Morrow Comics’ Bronze Age and Beyond! DESIGNER Rich Fowlks COVER ARTIST Bruce Timm (Harley Quinn commission from the collection of John Hicks.) COVER DESIGNER Michael Kronenberg PROOFREADER Rob Smentek SPECIAL THANKS Kevin Altieri Paul Levitz Brian Augustyn Judi Lewinson Brooke Barnett/DPN Elliot S. Maggin Talent Agency Tifiney McCullough Mike W. Barr Dennis O’Neil Norm Breyfogle Mike Parobeck Laren Bright Appreciation Society Rick Burchett Martin Pasko Alan Burnett Scott Peterson KC Carlson Mike Pigott Kevin Conroy Dr. Harleen Quinzell Gerry Conway Dan Riba Karen Crary Randy Rogel DC Comics Andrea Romano Sean Catherine Derek Nino Santiago Paul Dini Arleen Sorkin PRO2PRO ROUNDTABLE: Batman: The Animated Series: An Oral History . 2 Chuck Dixon Len Strazewski Animators, writers, and voice talent discuss the evolution of the classic Batman TV show Mark Evanier Tara Strong Lance Falk Rick Taylor EPISODE GUIDE: Batman: The Animated Series. 23 Jordan B. Gorfinkel Steven Thompson Grand Comics Bruce Timm BACKSTAGE PASS: Bob Hastings, the Voice of Commissioner Gordon . 30 Database John Trumbull This actor/voice actor was no stranger to comics-related roles Heritage Comics Steve Vance Auctions Warner Bros. Animation John Hicks Glenn Whitmore TOY BOX: The Animated Batmobile . 32 Christopher Jones Marv Wolfman Collectibles of the coolest cartoon car ever Karl Kesel Walden Wong Charlie Kochman World’s Finest Online FLASHBACK: The Batman Adventures: An Enduring Legacy .
    [Show full text]
  • Shail, Robert, British Film Directors
    BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS INTERNATIONAL FILM DIRECTOrs Series Editor: Robert Shail This series of reference guides covers the key film directors of a particular nation or continent. Each volume introduces the work of 100 contemporary and historically important figures, with entries arranged in alphabetical order as an A–Z. The Introduction to each volume sets out the existing context in relation to the study of the national cinema in question, and the place of the film director within the given production/cultural context. Each entry includes both a select bibliography and a complete filmography, and an index of film titles is provided for easy cross-referencing. BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS A CRITI Robert Shail British national cinema has produced an exceptional track record of innovative, ca creative and internationally recognised filmmakers, amongst them Alfred Hitchcock, Michael Powell and David Lean. This tradition continues today with L GUIDE the work of directors as diverse as Neil Jordan, Stephen Frears, Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. This concise, authoritative volume analyses critically the work of 100 British directors, from the innovators of the silent period to contemporary auteurs. An introduction places the individual entries in context and examines the role and status of the director within British film production. Balancing academic rigour ROBE with accessibility, British Film Directors provides an indispensable reference source for film students at all levels, as well as for the general cinema enthusiast. R Key Features T SHAIL • A complete list of each director’s British feature films • Suggested further reading on each filmmaker • A comprehensive career overview, including biographical information and an assessment of the director’s current critical standing Robert Shail is a Lecturer in Film Studies at the University of Wales Lampeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitment in Cinema Criticism LINDSAY ANDERSON
    Universities & Left Review Spring 1957 Vol.1 No 1 It is beginning to dawn upon us all that what is needed most today is a criticism of criticism . For Commitment it is the critic, rather than the work of art, who should be put for a while upon the dissecting table—ERNESTNEWMAN. It has for some time seemed to me that a criticism in cinema which has at heart the interest of liberalism might find its most useful work not in confirming liberalism in its sense of general rightness, but rather in putting under criticism some degree of pressure the liberal ideas and assump- tions of the present time—LIONEL TRILLING IN "THE LINDSAY ANDERSON* LIBERAL IMAGINATION". Stand up, stand up for Jesus!—GEORGE DUFFIELD. Instead of starting with any theoretical discussion merit of its significance—has actually been reduced. It about the nature of criticism, it may be useful to clear is of course inevitable that the majority of films made the ground by considering some aspects of its practice for popular entertainment in a capitalist society, where at the moment. What basic assumptions, what attitudes the general educational level is low and popular culture do we find common in the writing of present day increasingly corrupt, should be of poor artistic quality; critics? A first important point is that the cinema has nor is it surprising if people whose only experience of at least achieved respectability. the cinema is through such films form a low opinion of Thirty years ago it was only a minority who took it.
    [Show full text]
  • RFC's Library's Book Guide
    RFC’s Library’s Book Guide 2017 Since the beginning of our journey at the Royal Film Commission – Jordan (RFC), we have been keen to provide everything that promotes cinema culture in Jordan; hence, the Film Library was established at the RFC’s Film House in Jabal Amman. The Film Library offers access to a wide and valuable variety of Jordanian, Arab and International movies: the “must see” movies for any cinephile. There are some 2000 titles available from 59 countries. In addition, the Film Library has 2500 books related to various aspects of the audiovisual field. These books tackle artistic, technical, theoretical and historical aspects of cinema and filmmaking. The collec- tion of books is bilingual (English and Arabic). Visitors can watch movies using the private viewing stations available and read books or consult periodi- cals in a calm and relaxed atmosphere. Library members are, in addition, allowed to borrow films and/or books. Membership fees: 20 JOD per year; 10 JOD for students. Working hours: The Film Library is open on weekdays from 9:00 AM until 8:00 PM. From 3:00 PM until 8:00 PM on Saturdays. It is closed on Fridays. RFC’s Library’s Book Guide 2 About People In Cinema 1 A Double Life: George Cukor Patrick McGilligan 2 A Hitchcock Reader Marshall Dentelbaum & Leland Poague 3 A life Elia Kazan 4 A Man With a Camera Nestor Almenros 5 Abbas Kiarostami Saeed-Vafa & Rosenbaum 6 About John Ford Lindsay Anderson 7 Adventures with D.W. Griffith Karl Brown 8 Alexander Dovzhenko Marco Carynnk 9 All About Almodovar Epps And Kakoudeki
    [Show full text]
  • Film Locations in San Francisco
    Film Locations in San Francisco Title Release Year Locations A Jitney Elopement 1915 20th and Folsom Streets A Jitney Elopement 1915 Golden Gate Park Greed 1924 Cliff House (1090 Point Lobos Avenue) Greed 1924 Bush and Sutter Streets Greed 1924 Hayes Street at Laguna The Jazz Singer 1927 Coffee Dan's (O'Farrell Street at Powell) Barbary Coast 1935 After the Thin Man 1936 Coit Tower San Francisco 1936 The Barbary Coast San Francisco 1936 City Hall Page 1 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Fun Facts Production Company The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company During San Francisco's Gold Rush era, the The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company Park was part of an area designated as the "Great Sand Waste". In 1887, the Cliff House was severely Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) damaged when the schooner Parallel, abandoned and loaded with dynamite, ran aground on the rocks below. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Warner Bros. Pictures The Samuel Goldwyn Company The Tower was funded by a gift bequeathed Metro-Goldwyn Mayer by Lillie Hitchcock Coit, a socialite who reportedly liked to chase fires. Though the tower resembles a firehose nozzle, it was not designed this way. The Barbary Coast was a red-light district Metro-Goldwyn Mayer that was largely destroyed in the 1906 earthquake. Though some of the establishments were rebuilt after the earthquake, an anti-vice campaign put the establishments out of business. The dome of SF's City Hall is almost a foot Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Page 2 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Distributor Director Writer General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Warner Bros.
    [Show full text]