DOCSLIB.ORG

County Municipality Code of Residence Appendix B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area A ---Atlantic County-- B ----Bergen County--- A01 Absecon 15 B01 Allendale 45 A02 Atlantic City 15 B02 Alpine 47 A03 Brigantine 15 B03 Bergenfield 47 A04 Buena 15 B04 Bogota 49 A05 Buena Vista 15 B05 Carlstadt 50 A06 Corbin City 15 B06 Cliffside Park 48 A07 Egg Harbor City 15 B07 Closter 47 A08 Egg Harbor Township 15 B08 Cresskill 47 A09 Estell Manor 15 B09 Demarest 47 A10 Folsom 15 B10 Dumont 47 A11 Galloway 15 B11 Elmwood Park 46 A11 Galloway 15 B12 East Rutherford 50 A12 Hamilton 15 B13 Edgewater 48 A13 Hammonton 15 B14 Emerson 49 A14 Linwood 15 B15 Englewood 48 A15 Longport 15 B16 Englewood Cliffs 48 A16 Margate City 15 B17 Fair Lawn 46 A17 Mullica Hill 15 B18 Fairview 48 A18 Northfield 15 B19 Fort Lee 48 A19 Pleasantville 15 B20 Franklin Lakes 45 A20 Port Republic 15 B21 Garfield 50 A21 Somers Point 15 B22 Glen Rock 45 A22 Ventnor City 15 B23 Hackensack 49 A23 Weymouth 15 B24 Harrington Park 47 A99 Unknown Atlantic 99 B25 Hasbrouck Heights 49 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area B26 Haworth 47 B53 River Vale 47 B27 Hillsdale 46 B54 Rochelle Park 49 B28 Ho Ho Kus 45 B55 Rockleigh 47 B29 Leonia 48 B56 Rutherford 50 B30 Little Ferry 49 B57 Saddle River 45 B31 Lodi 49 B58 Saddle Brook 46 B32 Lyndhurst 50 B59 South Hackensack 49 B33 Mahwah 45 B60 Teaneck 48 B34 Maywood 49 B61 Tenafly 47 B35 Midland Park 45 B62 Teterboro 49 B36 Montvale 46 B63 Upper Saddle River 45 B37 Moonachie 50 B64 Waldwick 45 B38 New Milford 49 B65 Wallington 50 B39 North Arlington 50 B66 Washington Township 46 B40 Northvale 47 B67 Westwood 46 B41 Norwood 47 B68 Woodcliff Lake 46 B42 Oakland 45 B69 Wood Ridge 50 B43 Old Tappan 47 B70 Wyckoff 45 B44 Oradell 49 B99 Unknown Bergen 99 B45 Palisades Park 48 C --Burlington County- B46 Paramus 46 C01 Bass River 22 B47 Park Ridge 46 C02 Beverly 21 B48 Ramsey 45 C03 Bordentown 21 B49 Ridgefield 48 C04 Bordentown Township 21 B50 Ridgefield Park 48 C05 Burlington 21 B51 Ridgewood 45 C06 Burlington Township 21 B52 River Edge 49 C07 Chesterfield 21 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area C08 Cinnaminson 21 C35 Springfield 22 C09 Delanco 21 C36 Tabernacle 22 C10 Delran 21 C37 Washington Township 22 C11 Eastampton 22 C38 Westampton 22 C12 Edgewater Park 21 C39 Woodland 22 C13 Evesham 22 C40 Wrightstown 22 C14 Fieldsboro 21 C99 Unknown Burlington 99 C15 Florence 21 D ----Camden County--- C16 Hainesport 22 D01 Audubon 17 C17 Willingboro 21 D02 Audubon Park 17 C18 Lumberton 22 D03 Barrington 17 C19 Mansfield 21 D04 Bellmawr 17 C20 Maple Shade 22 D05 Berlin 18 C21 Medford 22 D06 Berlin Township 18 C22 Medford Lakes 22 D07 Brooklawn 17 C23 Moorestown 22 D08 Camden 16 C24 Mount Holly 22 D09 Chesilhurst 18 C25 Mount Laurel 22 D10 Clementon 18 C26 New Hanover 22 D11 Collingswood 16 C27 North Hanover 22 D12 Cherry Hill 18 C28 Palmyra 21 D13 Gibbsboro 18 C29 Pemberton 22 D14 Gloucester City 17 C30 Pemberton 22 D15 Gloucester Township 17 C31 Riverside 21 D16 Haddon 18 C32 Riverton 21 D17 Haddonfield 18 C33 Shamong 22 D18 Haddon Heights 17 C34 Southampton 22 D19 Hi-nella 18 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area D20 Laurel Springs 18 E08 Ocean City 14 D21 Lawnside 18 E09 Sea Isle City 14 D22 Lindenwold 18 E10 Stone Harbor Boro 14 D23 Magnolia 17 E11 Upper Township 14 D24 Merchantville 16 E12 West Cape May Boro 14 D25 Mount Ephraim 17 E13 West Wild Wood Boro 14 D26 Oaklyn 17 E14 Wildwood City 14 D27 Pennsauken 16 E15 Wildwood Crest Boro 14 D28 Pine Hill 18 E16 Woodbine Boro 14 D29 Pine Valley 18 E99 Unknown Cape May 99 D30 Runnemede 17 F --Cumberland County- D31 Somerdale 18 F01 Bridgeton 13 D32 Stratford 18 F02 Commercial Township 13 D33 Tavistock 18 F03 Deerfield Township 13 D34 Voorhees 18 F04 Downe Township 13 D35 Waterford 18 F05 Fairfield Township 13 D36 Winslow 17 F06 Greenwich 13 D37 Woodlynne 16 F07 Hopewell Township 13 D99 Unknown Camden 99 F08 Lawrence Township 13 E ---Cape May County— F09 Maurice River Township 13 E01 Avalon 14 F10 Millville 13 E02 Cape May City 14 F11 Shiloh Boro 13 E03 Cape May Point 14 F12 Stow Creek Township 13 E04 Dennis Township 14 F13 Upper Deerfield Township 13 E05 Lower Township 14 F14 Vineland City 13 E06 Middle Township 14 F99 Unknown Cumberland 99 E07 North Wildwood City 14 G ----Essex County---- COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area G01 Belleville 03 H02 Deptford Township 11 G02 Bloomfield 03 H03 East Greenwich Township 11 G03 Caldwell 01 H04 Elk Township 11 G04 Fairfield Township 01 H05 Franklin Township 11 G05 Cedar Grove 01 H06 Glassboro 11 G06 East Orange 02 H07 Greenwich Township 11 G07 Essex Fells 01 H08 Harrison Township 11 G08 Glen Ridge 01 H09 Logan Township 11 G09 Irvington 06 H10 Mantua 11 G10 Livingston 01 H11 Monroe Township 11 G11 Maplewood 02 H12 National Park 11 G12 Millburn 02 H13 Newfield 11 G13 Montclair 01 H14 Paulsboro 11 G14 Newark 04 H15 Pitman 11 G14 Newark City 06 H16 South Harrison Township 11 G14 Newark City 05 H17 Swedesboro 11 G15 North Caldwell Boro 01 H18 Washington Township 11 G16 Nutley 03 H19 Wenonah 11 G17 Orange 02 H20 West Deptford Township 11 G18 Roseland 01 H21 Westville 11 G19 South Orange 02 H22 Woodbury 11 G20 Verona 01 H23 Woodbury Heights 11 G21 West Caldwell 01 H24 Woolwich Township 11 G22 West Orange 02 H99 Unknown Gloucester 99 G99 Unknown Essex 99 J ----Hudson County-- H --Gloucester County- J01 Bayonne 44 H01 Clayton 11 J02 East Newark Boro 41 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area J03 Guttenberg Town 41 K15 Holland Township 59 J04 Harrison 41 K16 Kingwood Township 59 J05 Hoboken 40 K17 Lambertville 59 J06 Jersey City 42 K18 Lebanon 59 J06 Jersey City 43 K19 Lebanon Township 59 J07 Kearny 41 K20 Milford 59 J08 North Bergen 41 K21 Raritan 59 J09 Secaucus 41 K22 Readington 59 J10 Union City 40 K23 Stockton 59 J11 Weehawken Township 40 K24 Tewksbury Township 59 J12 West New York 41 K25 Union Township 59 J99 Unknown Hudson 99 K26 West Amwell Township 59 K --Hunterdon County- K99 Unknown Hunterdon 99 - L ----Mercer County--- K01 Alexandria Township 59 L01 East Windsor Township 23 K02 Bethlehem Township 59 L02 Ewing Township 24 K03 Bloomsbury 59 L03 Hamilton Township 25 K04 Califon 59 L04 Hightstown 23 K05 Clinton 59 L05 Hopewell 23 K06 Clinton Township 59 L06 Hopewell Township 23 K07 Delaware Township 59 L07 Lawrence Township 23 K08 East Amwell Township 59 L07 Lawrence Township 24 K09 Flemington 59 L08 Pennington 23 K10 Franklin Township 59 L09 Princeton 23 K11 Frenchtown 59 L10 Princeton 23 K12 Glen Gardner 59 L11 Trenton 24 K13 Hampton 59 L12 Washington Township 23 K14 High Bridge 59 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area L13 West Windsor Township 23 M25 Woodbridge 31 L99 Unknown Mercer 99 M99 Unknown Middlesex 99 M --Middlesex County- N ---Monmouth County - M01 Carteret 31 N01 Allenhurst 29 M02 Cranbury 32 N02 Allentown 29 M03 Dunellen 30 N03 Asbury Park 29 M04 East Brunswick 32 N04 Colts Neck 28 M05 Edison 30 N05 Atlantic Highlands 26 M06 Helmetta 32 N06 Avon By The Sea 29 M07 Highland Park 30 N07 Belmar 29 M08 Jamesburg 32 N07 Belmar 29 M09 Old Bridge 32 N08 Bradley Beach 29 M10 Metuchen 30 N09 Brielle 29 M11 Middlesex 30 N10 Deal 28 M12 Milltown 32 N11 Eatontown 28 M13 Monroe Township 32 N12 Englishtown 26 M14 New Brunswick 30 N13 Fair Haven 28 M15 North Brunswick 30 N14 Farmingdale 29 M16 Perth Amboy 31 N15 Freehold 28 M17 Piscataway 30 N16 Freehold Township 29 M18 Plainsboro 32 N16 Freehold Township 28 M19 Sayreville 32 N17 Highlands 26 M20 South Amboy 32 N18 Holmdel 26 M21 South Brunswick Township 32 N19 Howell 29 M22 South Plainfield 30 N20 Interlaken Boro 29 M23 South River 32 N21 Keansburg 26 M24 Spotswood 32 N22 Keyport 26 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area N23 Little Silver 28 N50 Union Beach Boro 26 N24 Loch Arbour Village 29 N51 Upper Freehold Township 29 N25 Long Branch 28 N52 Wall 29 N26 Manalapan Township 26 N53 West Long Branch 28 N27 Manasquan 29 N99 Unknown Monmouth 99 N28 Marlboro 26 P ----Morris County--- N29 Matawan 26 P01 Boonton 56 N31 Middletown 26 P02 Boonton Township 56 N32 Millstone Township 29 P03 Butler 56 N33 Monmouth Beach 28 P04 Chatham 57 N34 Neptune 29 P05 Chatham Township 57 N35 Neptune Boro 29 P06 Chester 57 N36 Tinton Falls Boro 28 P07 Chester Township 57 N37 Ocean Township 28 P08 Denville 55 N37 Ocean Township 29 P09 Dover 55 N38 Oceanport 28 P10 East Hanover 56 N39 Hazlet 26 P11 Florham Park 57 N40 Red Bank 26 P12 Hanover Township 57 N41 Roosevelt 29 P13 Harding Township 57 N42 Rumson 28 P14 Jefferson Township 55 N43 Sea Bright Boro 28 P15 Kinnelon 56 N44 Sea Girt 29 P16 Lincoln Park 56 N45 Shrewsbury 28 P17 Madison 57 N46 Shrewsbury Township 28 P18 Mendham 57 N47 South Belmar Boro 29 P19 Mendham Township 57 N48 Spring Lake 29 P20 Mine Hill Township 55 N49 Spring Lake Heights 29 P21 Montville 56 COUNTY MUNICIPALITY CODE OF RESIDENCE APPENDIX B Service Service CoMun City Area CoMun City Area P22 Morris Township 57 Q08 Eagleswood Township 07 P23 Morris Plains 57 Q09 Harvey Cedars Boro 07 P24 Morristown 57 Q10 Island Heights 10 P25 Mountain Lakes 56 Q11 Jackson 08 P26 Mount Arlington 55 Q12 Lacey Township 07 P27 Mt.
Recommended publications
  • Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier

    Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 1992 Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier Randy William Widds University of Regina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Widds, Randy William, "Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier" (1992). Great Plains Quarterly. 649. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/649 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SASKATCHEWAN BOUND MIGRATION TO A NEW CANADIAN FRONTIER RANDY WILLIAM WIDDIS Almost forty years ago, Roland Berthoff used Europeans resident in the United States. Yet the published census to construct a map of En­ despite these numbers, there has been little de­ glish Canadian settlement in the United States tailed examination of this and other intracon­ for the year 1900 (Map 1).1 Migration among tinental movements, as scholars have been this group was generally short distance in na­ frustrated by their inability to operate beyond ture, yet a closer examination of Berthoff's map the narrowly defined geographical and temporal reveals that considerable numbers of migrants boundaries determined by sources
  • Ngaka Modiri Molema District

    Ngaka Modiri Molema District

    2 PROFILE: NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT PROFILE: NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT 3 CONTENT 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction: Brief Overview ........................................................................................... 7 2.1. Historical Perspective .............................................................................................. 7 2.3. Spatial Status .......................................................................................................... 9 3. Social Development Profile .......................................................................................... 10 3.1. Key Social Demographics ..................................................................................... 10 3.1.1. Population .......................................................................................................... 10 3.1.2. Gender, Age and Race ....................................................................................... 11 3.1.3. Households ........................................................................................................ 12 3.2. Health Profile ......................................................................................................... 12 3.3. COVID - 19............................................................................................................ 13 3.4. Poverty Dimensions .............................................................................................
  • GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A

    GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A

    RASM 1935-E(A) GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-0. DUFRESNE, Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. McGerrigle QUEBEC REDEMPTI PARADIS PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON. Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-O. DUFRESNE. Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. MeGerrigle QUEBEe RÉDEMPTI PARADIS • PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS by H. W. McGerrigle TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 Scope of report and method of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Summary 6 Previous work . 7 Bibliography 9 DESCRIPTION OF PLACER LOCALITIES 11 Ascot township 11 Felton brook 12 Grass Island brook . 13 Auckland township. 18 Bury township .. 19 Ditton area . 20 General 20 Summary of topography and geology . 20 Table of formations 21 IIistory of development and production 21 Dudswell township . 23 Hatley township . 23 Horton township. 24 Ireland township. 25 Lamhton township . 26 Leeds township . 29 Magog township . 29 Orford township . 29 Shipton township 31 Moe and adjacent rivers 33 Moe river . 33 Victoria river 36 Stoke Mountain area .
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
  • Discrete Artificial Boundary Conditions Vorgelegt Von Diplom

    Discrete Artificial Boundary Conditions Vorgelegt Von Diplom

    Discrete Artificial Boundary Conditions vorgelegt von Diplom–Technomathematiker Matthias Ehrhardt aus Berlin Vom Fachbereich Mathematik der Technischen Universitat¨ Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuß: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Udo Simon, TU Berlin Berichter: Prof. Dr. Anton Arnold, Universitat¨ des Saarlandes Berichter: Prof. Dr. Rolf Dieter Grigorieff, TU Berlin Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 25.5.2001 Berlin 2001 D 83 Contents Acknowledgement iii Abstract v Zusammenfassung vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1. The Schrodinger¨ Equation 5 1. Transparent Boundary Conditions 5 2. Discrete Transparent Boundary Conditions 9 3. DTBC for non–compactly supported Initial Data 26 4. Numerical Inverse –Transformations 33 Chapter 2. The Convection–Diffusion Equation 41 1. Transparent Boundary Conditions 41 2. Discrete Transparent Boundary Conditions 44 3. Numerical Results 57 Chapter 3. The Wide–Angle Equation of Underwater Acoustics 67 1. Introduction to Underwater Acoustics 67 2. Transparent Boundary Conditions 72 3. Coupled Models for Underwater Acoustics 76 4. The Transparent Boundary Condition for an Elastic Bottom 78 5. Discrete Transparent Boundary Conditions 82 6. Numerical Examples 91 Conclusions and Perspectives 101 Appendix 103 The Laplace Transformation 103 The Inverse Laplace Transformation 104 The –Transformation 105 The Inverse –Transformation 106 Bibliography 109 Curriculum Vitae 115 i ii CONTENTS Acknowledgement I want to express my deep gratitude to my Ph.D. supervisor Prof. Dr. Anton Arnold for his persevering support during the last years. I also thank Prof. Dr. Peter Markowich for offering me a position at the Technical University in Berlin. Special thanks to Prof. Dr. Juan Soler for inviting me as a TMR–Predoc to Granada.
  • Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017

    Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017

    Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017 August, 2018 Erie County Department of Health 606 West 2nd Street Erie, PA 16507 Telephone: 814-451-6700 Website: ECDH This report was prepared by Jeff Quirk, Epidemiologist ([email protected]). The primary sources of data and information for this report are the Erie County Department of Health and the United States Census Bureau. Background: From 2000 to 2010, Erie County’s population remained level at around 280,000 residents. However, since 2010 the county’s population fell by over 6,000 residents, with losses occurring for the past five consecutive years (Figure 1). This report details the population changes that have taken place among the county’s 38 municipalities for the period 2000-2017. Figure 1 284,000 281,502 282,000 281,288 280,843 280,566 280,647 280,000 279,351 278,111 278,000 276,321 Population 276,000 274,541 274,000 272,000 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Erie County’s 38 municipalities include 2 cities, 14 boroughs, and 22 townships. These municipalities vary greatly in total population and size (land area). In 2017, municipality populations ranged from a low of 209 residents in Elgin Borough to a high of 97,369 in the City of Erie, while land areas ranged from a low of 0.3 square miles in Wattsburg Borough to a high of 50.0 in Waterford Township. From an overall numbers perspective, 12 municipalities increased in population since 2000 (Table 1, Figure 2). Harborcreek Township experienced the largest gain with an increase of 2,225 residents.
  • Challenge of Defining a National Urban Strategy in the Context of Divergent Demographic Trends in Small and Large Canadian Cities

    Challenge of Defining a National Urban Strategy in the Context of Divergent Demographic Trends in Small and Large Canadian Cities

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Western Washington University The challenge of defining a national urban strategy in the context of divergent demographic trends in small and large Canadian cities Gilles Viaud, Department of Geography, CURA – Quality of life indicator researcher, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada, V2C 5N3. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Once forgotten as an object of research, a growing literature dealing with various aspects of small cities has emerged since the new millennium. The answer to the question “does size matter?” has so far received positive empirical support on both sides of the Atlantic. Using the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) three quality of life studies as backdrop, this paper offers further evidence that small Canadian cities are worth our attention. Since 1999, FCM has extrapolated results from its series of quality of life studies carried out on a sample of large and medium sized cities to monitor key changes in the quality of life of Canadian urban residents. Conclusions drawn from these studies have been used to define a common Canadian municipal agenda which identifies air pollution, public transportation, affordable housing, homelessness, social inclusion and integration, and community safety and security as some of Canada’s key urban policy priorities. Following the evolution of a number of key demographic indicators in larger and smaller Canadian cities between 1996 and 2006, this research questions whether the municipal agenda derived from FCM’s quality of life studies offers a fair and just reflection of the reality and of the public policy priorities of smaller urban municipalities.
  • County Regulation of Land Use and Development

    County Regulation of Land Use and Development

    Volume 9 Issue 2 Spring 1969 Spring 1969 County Regulation of Land Use and Development Edward C. Walterscheid Recommended Citation Edward C. Walterscheid, County Regulation of Land Use and Development, 9 Nat. Resources J. 266 (1969). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol9/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. COUNTY REGULATION OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT In New Mexico, a county is "a body corporate and politic."' It should not be equated with a municipal corporation, being in the strictest sense distinguishable from such a corporation, but rather is more correctly termed a quasi-municipal corporation. It has only such powers as are expressly or impliedly given to it by constitutional or legislative provisions. 3 As originally adopted in 1911, the New Mexico Constitution was silent as to the powers of counties. In the ensuing years it has been amended to allow for the formation of two special types of counties constitutionally having powers at least as broad as those of municipalities. 4 However, only one specialized county has yet been authorized 4a-and no others appear likely in the near future-so that with this one exception all counties existing for the next few years are likely to remain dependent on legislative grants for their powers.5 By statute, all counties are empowered: First.
  • Travel Guide Berlin

    Travel Guide Berlin

    The U2tour.de Travel Guide Berlin English Version Version Januar 2020 © U2tour.de The U2Tour.de – Travel Guide Berlin The U2Tour.de Travel Guide Berlin You're looking for traces of U2? Finally in Berlin and don't know where to go? Or are you travelling in Berlin and haven't found Kant Kino? This has now come to an end, because now there is the U2Tour.de- Travel Guide, which should help you with your search. At the moment there are 20 U2 sights in our database, which will be constantly extended and updated with your help. Original photos and pictures from different years tell the story of every single place. You will also receive the exact addresses, a spot on the map and directions. So it should be possible for every U2 fan to find these points with ease. Credits Texts: Dietmar Reicht, Björn Lampe, Florian Zerweck, Torsten Schlimbach, Carola Schmidt, Hans ' Hasn' Becker, Shane O'Connell, Anne Viefhues, Oliver Zimmer. Pictures und Updates: Dietmar Reicht, Shane O'Connell, Thomas Angermeier, Mathew Kiwala (Bodie Ghost Town), Irv Dierdorff (Joshua Tree), Brad Biringer (Joshua Tree), Björn Lampe, S. Hübner (RDS), D. Bach (Slane), Joe St. Leger (Slane), Jan Année , Sven Humburg, Laura Innocenti, Michael Sauter, bono '61, AirMJ, Christian Kurek, Alwin Beck, Günther R., Stefan Harms, acktung, Kraft Gerald, Silvia Kruse, Nicole Mayer, Kay Mootz, Carola Schmidt, Oliver Zimmer and of course Anton Corbijn and Paul Slattery. Maps from : Google Maps, Mapquest.com, Yahoo!, Loose Verlag, Bay City Guide, Down- townla.com, ViaMichelin.com, Dorling Kindersley, Pharus Plan Media, Falk Routenplaner Screencaps : Rattle & Hum (Paramount Pictures), The Unforgettable Fire / U2 Go Home DVD (Uni- versal/Island), Pride Video, October Cover, Best Of 1990-2000 Booklet, The Unforgettable Fire Cover, Beautiful Day Video, u.v.m.
  • Introductionntroduction

    Introductionntroduction

    CCHAPTERHAPTER 1:1: IINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION In This Chapter: Historical Setting - History & Memories Location in the County & Region - Location & Description, Municipal Boundaries Regional Influences on the Township - Accessibility, Urban Development, Transportation, Recreation and Cultural Facilities PORT HURON TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION The information presented here is a combination of input from citizens and elected and appointed officials, as well as Township Planning Commission members and staff, along with the assistance and guidance of the St. Clair County Planning Commission. It contains statistical data and information, both past and present, that can give some insight for our future. While we cannot definitively project future development, we can try to help determine efficient and effective ways of managing and shaping the way our Township develops. In concert with that thought, this plan also includes a chapter on a Vision for the Township which includes both goals and objectives. This can help us focus on what we would like development to look like when it comes, and to give direction to developers on the expectations we have as a community. Knowing that these goals and objectives have been developed by our citizens gives them guidance as to what is desirable and marketable to our residents and therefore profitable to them. While many master plans contain an overwhelming amount of statistical information, we hope to provide a fair amount of usable information in the form of maps, charts and tables that demonstrate logical and historical reasons and trends for what has taken place in the Township and how we can benefit from that in our future.
  • Largely Granted to and Settled by United Empire Loyalists Under Who Married Reuben B

    Largely Granted to and Settled by United Empire Loyalists Under Who Married Reuben B

    376 37T largely granted to and settled by United Empire Loyalists under who married Reuben B. Scott, and settled at Colborne. Their Captain Michael Grass. children and grandchildren are now quite widely scattered, some The second township, called Ernesttown, was settled mainly of them being in the United States, others in Toronto, while a few by the officers and soldiers of Sir John Johnson's regiment, also are in the neighborhood of Colborne and the Bay district. His known as the King's New York Eoyal Eangers. The third town- son, James P. Scott, married M. Agatha Ives; they reside in ship, or Fredericksburg, was granted mainly to the soldiers of a Toronto and have four children, namely, Susannah Ives, Luella particular regiment while the fourth township, or Adolphus- Isabel, Agatha J. and Helen A. The two last named are twins, town, was granted to and settled by some of the best people who born September 17, 1904. * made up the United Empire Loyalist movement. They had served in the Eevolutionary War, and they were nearly all of them peo- LIEUT. JOHN HUYCK. ple of property, and their average intelligence and education was THE CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN: remarkably high. Hence we find that while Adolphustown is the I. John Huyck, m. Jemima Clapp; set. Adolphustown. Issue: smallest township in Ontario in area, it has occupied for many (1) John, (2) Benjamin, (3) William H., (4) Burger, (5) years a commanding place in the province, and from its founda- Thomas, (6) Henry, (7) Jane, (8) Anne, (9) Phoebe, and tion to this time has contributed many men to public life.
  • English / French

    English / French

    World Heritage 38 COM WHC-14/38.COM/8B Paris, 30 April 2014 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-eighth session Doha, Qatar 15 – 25 June 2014 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8B. Nominations to the World Heritage List SUMMARY This document presents the nominations to be examined by the Committee at its 38th session (Doha, 2014). It is divided into four sections: I Changes to names of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List II Examination of nominations of natural, mixed and cultural properties to the World Heritage List III Statements of Outstanding Universal Value of the three properties inscribed at the 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013) and not adopted by the World Heritage Committee IV Record of the physical attributes of each property being discussed at the 38th session The document presents for each nomination the proposed Draft Decision based on the recommendations of the appropriate Advisory Body(ies) as included in WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B1 and WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B2 and it provides a record of the physical attributes of each property being discussed at the 38th session. The information is presented in two parts: • a table of the total surface area of each property and any buffer zone proposed, together with the geographic coordinates of each site's approximate centre point; and • a set of separate tables presenting the component parts of each of the 16 proposed serial properties.