DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams P Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol Narrative – Version 1.03 – July 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol for the Park Units in the Northern Colorado Plateau Network Rebecca Weissinger 1 Dana Witwicki 1 Helen Thomas 1 Aneth Wight 1 Katrina Lund 1 Matthew Van Grinsven 1 Michael L. Scott 2 Elizabeth W. Peltz 2 1 Northern Colorado Plateau Network Inventory and Monitoring Program P.O. Box 848, Bldg. 11, Arches National Park Moab, UT 84532 2 U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Discipline FORT Science Center 2150 Centre Ave., Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526 Version 1.03 (July 2013) 1 Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol Narrative – Version 1.03 – July 2013 Revision History Log: Prev. Revision Author Changes Made Reason for Change New Version # Date Version # 1.00 11/2011 D. Witwicki Updated terminology for Previous version unclear; 1.01 heapins / transect ends; no longer sampling updated methods species richness 1.01 1/2013 R. Grammatical Response to peer review; 1.02 Weissinger, corrections; method greenline sampling not D. Witwicki clarifications; removed repeatable greenline sampling; added rationale for spatial & revisit designs 1.02 7/2013 H. Thomas Revised section 5.2 (data To expand upon the 1.03 model) management of hydrology and geomorphology data 2 Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol Narrative – Version 1.03 – July 2013 Table of Contents 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Riparian areas as a focus for monitoring efforts................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Surface flow .................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.2 Alluvial groundwater..................................................................................................... 10 1.1.3 Fluvial geomorphic processes -- Stream channel and flood plain form ........................ 11 1.1.4 Riparian vegetation ....................................................................................................... 11 1.2 History of riparian research in NCPN park units ............................................................... 12 2 Program Goals and Measurable Objectives .............................................................................. 14 3 Sampling Design ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Rationale for selected design .............................................................................................. 16 3.2 Response design ................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Spatial design ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Sampling frame ............................................................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Spatial balance............................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Revisit design ...................................................................................................................... 20 4 Field Methods ........................................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Field season preparations .................................................................................................... 22 4.2 Sampling procedures .......................................................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Establishing the reach.................................................................................................... 22 4.2.2 Vegetation measurements ............................................................................................. 23 4.2.3 Geomorphic measurements ........................................................................................... 23 4.2.4 Hydrologic measurements ............................................................................................. 23 4.3 End-of-season procedures.................................................................................................... 23 5 Data Management ..................................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Data organization ................................................................................................................ 24 5.2 Data model .......................................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Data entry ........................................................................................................................... 24 5.4 Data verification, validation, and certification ................................................................... 25 5.5 Metadata procedures ........................................................................................................... 25 5.6 Data maintenance and archiving......................................................................................... 25 6 Reporting and Analysis ............................................................................................................. 26 6.1 Annual reports .................................................................................................................... 26 6.2 Status and trend reports ...................................................................................................... 26 7 Personnel Requirements and Training ...................................................................................... 27 7.1 Roles and responsibilities ................................................................................................... 27 7.2 Qualifications...................................................................................................................... 27 7.3 Training .............................................................................................................................. 28 8 Operational Requirements ........................................................................................................ 28 8.1 Annual workload and field schedule .................................................................................. 28 9 Revising the Protocol ................................................................................................................ 29 10 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................... 29 3 Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol Narrative – Version 1.03 – July 2013 SOP 1: Preparations for the Field Season and Equipment Needed SOP 2: Hiring and Training Field Technicians SOP 3: Using Global Positioning System (GPS) Units SOP 4: Establishing the Reach and Setting up Transects SOP 5: Repeat Photos SOP 6: Vegetation Sampling SOP 7: Assessing Channel Substrate Particle Size Distribution Using a Pebble Count SOP 8: Site Impact Assessment SOP 9: Stream Channel Surveying SOP 10: Well Installation and Hydrologic Monitoring SOP 11: After each Field Trip SOP 12: After the Field Season SOP 13: Data Management SOP 14: Data Analysis and Reporting SOP 15: Revising the Protocol List of Tables Table 1. List of wadeable streams selected for monitoring. ......................................................... 20 Table 2. Outline of revisit design for each stream sampled by the NCPN ................................... 21 Table 3. Indicators of riparian health for each vital sign. ............................................................. 26 List of Figures Figure 1. A general conceptual model of reach-scale relationships among physical and biotic components of riparian ecosystems of the Colorado Plateau ................................................... 9 Figure 2. Map of park units and major drainages in the NCPN, including park units with riparian monitoring. ............................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 3. Example of a riparian monitoring reach with seven equidistant cross-section transects. ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 4. Locations of vegetation sampling along each permanent cross-section transect. ......... 19 Figure 5. Number of reaches sampled each year based on a 7-year rotating panel revisit design. ................................................................................................................................................ 21 4 Riparian Monitoring of Wadeable Streams Protocol Narrative – Version 1.03 – July 2013 Acronyms ARCH Arches National Park ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange BLCA Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park CANY Canyonlands National Park CARE Capitol Reef National Park CPR Cardiopulmonary resuscitation dbh Diameter at breast height DINO Dinosaur National Monument EPA Environmental Protection Agency FGDC Federal Geographic Data Committee GPS Global positioning system GRTS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Mighty Five from Salt Lake City
    Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City (8 days) Explore five breathtaking national parks: Arches, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, Bryce Canyon & Zion, also known as Utah's Mighty 5. You’ll get a chance to explore them all on this 8-day guided tour in southern Utah. Join a small group of no more than 14 guests and a private guide on this adventure. Hiking, scenic viewpoints, local eateries, hidden gems, and other fantastic experiences await! Dates October 03 - October 10, 2021 October 10 - October 17, 2021 October 17 - October 24, 2021 October 24 - October 31, 2021 October 31 - November 07, 2021 November 07 - November 14, 2021 November 14 - November 21, 2021 November 21 - November 28, 2021 November 28 - December 05, 2021 December 05 - December 12, 2021 December 12 - December 19, 2021 December 19 - December 26, 2021 December 26 - January 02, 2022 Highlights Small Group Tour 5 National Parks Salt Lake City Hiking Photography Beautiful Scenery Professional Tour Guide Comfortable Transportation 7 Nights Hotel Accommodations 7 Breakfasts, 6 Lunches, 2 Dinners Park Entrance Fees Taxes & Fees Itinerary Day 1: Arrival in Salt Lake City, Utah 1 / 3 Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Arrive at the Salt Lake Airport and transfer to the hotel on own by hotel shuttle. The rest of the day is free to explore on your own. Day 2: Canyonlands National Park Depart Salt Lake City, UT at 7:00 am and travel to Canyonlands National Park. Hike to Mesa Arch for an up-close view of one of the most photographed arches in the Southwestern US.
    [Show full text]
  • River Flow Advisory
    River Flow Advisory Bureau . of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 1 September 1984 River flows in the Upper Colorado River drainage, still high for this time of year, are not expected to decrease much for several weeks: While the daily update of operations and releases has been discontinued, the toll-free numbers now provide updates on Bureau of Reclamation activities and projects. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado River on September 10 was 7, 000 cfs, and is expected to decrease slightly over the next few weeks. Cataract Canyon Includin2 the Green- River The flow was 11,500 cfs on September 10 and will continue to decrease slightly. Lake Powell Lake Powell's elevation on September 10 was 3,699. Assuming normal inflow for this time of year, the lake should continue to go down slowly to elevation 3,682 by next spring. Colorado River through Grand Canyon . Releases through Glen Canyon Dam remain at 25,000 cfs. These releases are expected to be maintained with no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is now at elevation 6,482 feet. Releases through the dam will be reduced to about 600 cfs starting on September 17 for about 2 weeks during powerplant maintenance. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam On September 10 Flaming Gorge Reservoir was at elevation 6,039.9 feet. Releases from the dam are expected to average 2, 500 cfs in September and October with usual daily fluctuations.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 70 GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS IN THE UPPER VIRGIN RIVER AND KANAB CREEK BASINS AREA, UTAH, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE by R. M. Cordova Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with The Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1981 CONTENTS Page Conversion factors VI Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope of the study.................................... 2 Previous studies and acknowledgments 2 Data-site-numbering system........................................ 3 Location and general features of the study area 3 Physiography and drainage 3 Climate 6 CuI ture and economy 9 Geologic setting 9 General characteristics of the rocks 9 General geologic structure 11 Water resources 11 Precipitation 11 Surface water 13 Runoff 13 Chemical quality 13 Ground water 16 General conditions of occurrence 16 Unconsolidated-rock aquifers 17 Consolidated-rock aquifers 19 Hydrologic properties of aquifers 20 Recharge 27 Movement 28 Discharge 30 Seepage to streams 31 Evapotranspiration 31 Springs 33 Wells 35 Subsurface outflow 36 Storage 37 Chemical quality 41 General characteristics 41 Relation to use 47 Public supply 47 Irrigation supply 47 Temperature 49 Possible hydrologic effects of increased ground-water development 50 Interference with existing wells .......................•.......... 50 Shift of the ground-water divide 55 Reduction of streamflow 56 Effects on chemical quality of water 56 Summary and conclusions 57 References cited 59 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights 78 III ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] Plate 1. Map showing selected geohydrologic information in the upper Virgin River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River
    final environmental statement wild and scenic river study september 1979 GUNNISON RIVER COLORADO SPECIAL NOTE This environmental statement was initiated by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources in January, 1976. On January 30, 1978, a reorganization within the U.S. Department of the Interior resulted in BOR being restructured and renamed the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS). On March 27, 1978, study responsibility was transferred from HCRS to the National Park Service. The draft environmental statement was prepared by HCRS and cleared by the U.S. Department of the Interior prior to March 27, 1978. Final revisions and publication of both the draft environmental statement, as well as this document have been the responstbility of the National Park Service. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT GUNNISON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDY Prepared by United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources represented by the Water Conservation Board staff Director National Par!< Service SUMMARY ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Department of the Interior, National Park Service 1. Type of action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative 2. Brief description of action: The Gunnison Wild and Scenic River Study recommends inclusion of a 26-mile (41.8-km) segment of the Gunnison River, Colorado, and 12,900 acres (S,200 ha) of adjacent land to be classified as wild in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System under the administration of the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. D. I. This river segment extends from the upstream boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument to approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) below the confluence with the Smith Fork.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role
    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role Updated March 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45546 SUMMARY R45546 Management of the Colorado River: Water March 21, 2019 Allocation, Drought, and the Federal Role Charles V. Stern The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states Specialist in Natural (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Resources Policy Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used Pervaze A. Sheikh primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also Specialist in Natural is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses. Resources Policy In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies. River Management The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border).
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study 2006
    NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY NAVAJO RESERVOIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84138 Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page ii NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY PREPARED FOR: SAN JUAN RIVER ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAM BY: Amy Cutler U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Regional Office FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 ii Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................5 3. MODELING OVERVIEW .......................................................................................6 4. RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODELING ......................................................7 5. RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING...............................................................14 6. UNSTEADY RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING........................................18 7. ADDRESSING RESERVOIR SCENARIOS USING CE-QUAL-W2................23 7.1 Base Case Scenario............................................................................................23 7.2 TCD Scenarios...................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And
    1 * This paper is under review for publication in Hydrogeology Journal as well as a chapter in my soon to be published 2 master’s thesis. 3 4 Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and 5 southern Utah 6 7 Riley K. Swanson1* 8 Abraham E. Springer1 9 David K. Kreamer2 10 Benjamin W. Tobin3 11 Denielle M. Perry1 12 13 1. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, US 14 email: [email protected] 15 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, US 16 3. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, US 17 *corresponding author 18 19 Abstract 20 Water in the Colorado River is known to be a highly over-allocated resource, yet decision makers fail to consider, in 21 their management efforts, one of the most important contributions to the existing water in the river, groundwater. This 22 failure may result from the contrasting results of base flow studies conducted on the amount of streamflow into the 23 Colorado River sourced from groundwater. Some studies rule out the significance of groundwater contribution, while 24 other studies show groundwater contributing the majority flow to the river. This study uses new and extant 1 25 instrumented data (not indirect methods) to quantify the base flow contribution to surface flow and highlight the 26 overlooked, substantial portion of groundwater. Ten remote sub-basins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah and 27 northern Arizona were examined in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    ARCHES NATIONAL PARK Double Arch Although there are arches and natural bridges found all over the world, these natural phenomena nowhere are found in such profusion as they are in Arches National Park, located in Grand County, Utah, north of the town of Moab. The Colorado River forms the southern boundary of the park, and the LaSal Mountains are visible from most viewpoints inside the park`s boundaries. The park is situated in the middle of the Colorado Plateau, a vast area of deep canyons and prominent mountain ranges that also includes Canyonlands National Park, Colorado National Monument, Natural Bridges National Monument, and Dinosaur National Monument. The Colorado Plateau is covered with layers of Jurassic-era sandstones; the type most prevalent within the Park is called Entrada Sandstone, a type that lends itself to the arch cutting that gives the park its name. Arches National Park covers more than 73,000 acres, or about 114 square miles. There are more than 500 arches found inside the park′s boundaries, and the possibility exists that even more may be discovered. The concentration of arches within the park is the result of the angular topography, much exposed bare rock, and erosion on a major scale. In such an arid area - annual precipitation is about 8.5 inches per year - it is not surprising that the agent of most erosion is wind and frost. Flora and fauna in the park and its immediate surrounding area are mainly desert adaptations, except in the canyon bottoms and along the Colorado River, where a riverine or riparian environment is found.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Options~
    14848 Seven Oaks Lane Draper, UT 84020 1-888-517-EPIC [email protected] APMA Annual Scientific Meeting (The National) ~Tour Options~ Zion National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Depart Salt Lake City and travel to Zion 10am-5pm Zion National Park We will leave Springdale and head in to the park and enjoy our first hike together up to Emerald Pools. This mild warm up is a beautiful loop trail that will take us along a single track trail, past waterfalls and pools of cool blue water all nesting beneath the massive monolith cliffs of Zion. Afterward we will drive up canyon and walk two trails known as the Riverwalk and Big Bend. The Virgin River, descending from the upper plateau, has worked its way over time through the sandstone carving out the main Zion corridor. You’ll be amazed by the stunning views as we walk along the river. Following these hikes, we will stop for lunch at the Zion Lodge which sits in the park. After lunch, we will drive to the eastern side of the park and through the Carmel Tunnel which was carved out of the solid cliff face in the 1920’s. We will start first at Checkerboard Mesa where you can explore the massive sandstone monoliths. Lastly, we walk along the Overlook Trail until we reach the stunning viewpoint overlooking the entire canyon. 5-6pm Dinner 6-10pm Travel to Salt Lake City Arches National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Travel from Salt Lake City to Arches National 10am-5pm Arches National Park In Arches National Park, we begin at the Wall Street trail head.
    [Show full text]