DOCSLIB.ORG

Virgin River Coalition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virgin River Coalition Virgin River Coalition MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Arizona Game and Fish Department; Bunkerville Irrigation Company; Bureau of Land Management (Las Vegas Field Office; Arizona Strip District); City of Mesquite; Clark County Desert Conservation Program; Friends of Gold Butte; Kokopelli ATV Club; National Park Service; Nevada Department of Wildlife; Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; Partners in Conservation; Rivers Edge West; The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Program Southern Nevada Field Office and Northern Arizona Field Office; and the United States Geological Survey Article 1. Background and Purpose A tributary of the Colorado River, the Virgin River is an extraordinary, and threatened, river in the Southwest United States. The river, rising in the mountains above Zion National Park, flows through southwest Utah, northwest Arizona, northeast Clark County, Nevada and eventually to Lake Mead. The Lower Virgin River, which for the purposes of this MOU includes the areas of the river from where the Virgin River crosses the Utah-Arizona border to where it empties into Lake Mead, remains one of the few free-flowing rivers in the Southwest and is a critical source of life for communities and a remarkable aquatic and riparian biodiversity. The Virgin River watershed faces several challenges. Invasive species, frequent drought and rapid population growth are placing significant pressure on the overall health of the river ecosystem and making it difficult to provide water to sustain urban, agriculture and environmental water needs. Conservation efforts in portions of the watershed have also been hindered by a lack of coordination between various planning and management entities and sustainable funding sources. Since 2017, the Virgin River Coalition (VRC), a public-private collaborative, has been focused on developing a community-based integrated watershed plan for the Lower Virgin River in the states of Arizona and Nevada. The intent of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is to provide guidance and procedures for the completion of a Lower Virgin River Integrated Watershed Plan and the initial implementation of strategies. Local communities, state and federal agencies, non-profit and private companies, and private landowners desire to build on the first year of collaboration to protect the shared investment in restoring and protecting the riparian corridor of the Lower Virgin River, as outlined in the VRC Watershed Plan for nature and local communities. All parties, as listed above, recognize that the challenge of implementing any of the identified strategies will be more successful with a coordinated effort utilizing the skills and expertise available through this collaborative effort. Article 2. Authorities The following are the key laws, regulations or authorities that support the participation of the signatories in the VRC. 1 The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1737, Sec 307; The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, (42 USS 1737) and the Wyden Amendment (16 U.S.C. § 1011(a)). 16 U.S.C. 1282(b)(1)): The Secretary of the Interior shall assist, advise, and cooperate with States or their political subdivisions, landowners, private organizations, or individuals to plan, protect, and manage river resources. Such assistance, advice and cooperation may be through written agreements or otherwise The Partners for Fish and Wildlife Act (Public Law 109-294), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956) (16 U.S.C. 742a-j), as amended. NRS 501.351 provides authority for the Administrator of NDOW to enter into cooperative agreements for the purpose of the management of native wildlife. NRS 503.584 recognizes the state’s obligation to conserve and protect imperiled native species. Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 503.065 extend to protect wildlife status to certain native fish including the Virgin Spinedace, Virgin River Chub and Woundfin. Non-profit organizations, private companies, and public agencies may enter into this MOU based on authority granted by their boards of directors, city council, county commission, supervisors, and/or other applicable policies, laws, regulations, or authorities. Article 3. Statement of Mutual Benefits It is the VRC’s vision to have a thriving Lower Virgin River watershed that provides multiple uses for people and nature, maintained and restored through public and private collaboration, from now into the future. To achieve the vision above we intend to adhere to a mission of developing strategies, identifying partnerships, facilitating implementation and evaluating progress to improve the human values and ecological health of the Virgin River for future generations of residents, businesses, recreational users, farmers and ranchers. To guide the mission, the VRC will develop a Watershed Plan. The Plan shall be a living document and initially will focus on four targets identified by the VRC: 1. Recreation 2. Water Management 3. Native Fish 4. Riparian Habitat The Parties agree to collaborate, providing information and expertise, developing strategies to meet objectives, cooperating with existing organizations and projects, and sharing knowledge of best practices for the watershed. Additional parties may be added upon approval of the Steering Committee, by attaching an additional signature page to the MOU agreement. 2 Article 4. Term of Agreement This MOU shall take effect on the date of the final signature and shall be in full force and effect five years from the date of the signed MOU. This MOU may be modified in writing by mutual agreement of all Parties. Article 5. Principal Contacts The Principal Contacts for each Party are maintained by the VRC Steering Committee. This list will be formally reviewed every three (3) years and updated and/or revised as necessary to keep the contact list current. Principal Contacts will be the primary contact for implementation of this MOU. Article 6. Roles and Responsibilities The VRC is made up of representatives of this agreement. The Parties agree to provide assistance of technical experts, information, and/or input to help in the completion and implementation of the comprehensive VRC Watershed Plan. The Parties agree to meet intermittently to develop or review the plan, review progress on strategies and share information that will assist the VRC in meeting its goals. There are many public and private partners that play important roles and responsibilities for restoring the Lower Virgin River riparian corridor by supporting grant proposals, providing technical assistance, sharing human and technical resources, and generally helping advance VRC goals. Partners that sign on to this MOU agree to all or some of the following activities: Assist with coordination of the watershed committee. Assist in coordination and implementation of restoration activities. Provide technical assistance. Seek funding for projects. Assist with monitoring and evaluation of ongoing and completed work. Promote the watershed committee and its work in the community. The VRC will meet a minimum of one time a year or more as deemed necessary by the Steering Committee to review the development of the Watershed Plan and guide implementation, discuss challenges and celebrate successes. Article 7. Working Groups The following working groups have been established to help meet VRC goals. Per the VRC mission, which encourages increasing effectiveness through incorporation of lessons learned, the configuration of these sub-committees may evolve during the implementation period. 3 . The Recreation Working Group will support and assist in the development of a watershed-scale comprehensive recreation plan focused around the Lower Virgin River. The Water Management Working Group will work to increase flexibility for water management to maximize value and use of water for both the human community and the environment. The Native Fish Working Group will work to restore native fish populations. The Riparian Habitat Working Group will reduce non-native species, increase native species cover, and improve habitat for riparian bird species. The Communications and Outreach Working Group will work to share products and information of the VRC and working groups with the Mesquite community, other river restoration efforts, and the general public. The Steering Committee is the entrusted body for the larger partnership and working groups. The Steering Committee develops the meeting agenda, fosters cross-working group coordination, leads working groups if needed, follows up on actions identified by the Coalition and working groups, and takes direction from and provides guidance to the partnership. The Steering Committee will confirm that expenditures of funds support the goals and objectives of the watershed plan. The Steering Committee is comprised of a minimum of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service representative, a U.S. Bureau of Land Management, community representatives, non-profit organizations, and a representative of Clark County. Article 8. Period of MOU and Termination This MOU shall remain in effect until 5 years from the date of the signed MOU. Any of the Parties, in writing, may terminate their participation in this instrument in whole, or in part, at any time with 30 days written notice. Article 9. Required Clauses Civil Rights. During the performance of this MOU, the Parties will not discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Non-fund
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 70 GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS IN THE UPPER VIRGIN RIVER AND KANAB CREEK BASINS AREA, UTAH, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE by R. M. Cordova Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with The Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1981 CONTENTS Page Conversion factors VI Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope of the study.................................... 2 Previous studies and acknowledgments 2 Data-site-numbering system........................................ 3 Location and general features of the study area 3 Physiography and drainage 3 Climate 6 CuI ture and economy 9 Geologic setting 9 General characteristics of the rocks 9 General geologic structure 11 Water resources 11 Precipitation 11 Surface water 13 Runoff 13 Chemical quality 13 Ground water 16 General conditions of occurrence 16 Unconsolidated-rock aquifers 17 Consolidated-rock aquifers 19 Hydrologic properties of aquifers 20 Recharge 27 Movement 28 Discharge 30 Seepage to streams 31 Evapotranspiration 31 Springs 33 Wells 35 Subsurface outflow 36 Storage 37 Chemical quality 41 General characteristics 41 Relation to use 47 Public supply 47 Irrigation supply 47 Temperature 49 Possible hydrologic effects of increased ground-water development 50 Interference with existing wells .......................•.......... 50 Shift of the ground-water divide 55 Reduction of streamflow 56 Effects on chemical quality of water 56 Summary and conclusions 57 References cited 59 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights 78 III ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] Plate 1. Map showing selected geohydrologic information in the upper Virgin River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Options~
    14848 Seven Oaks Lane Draper, UT 84020 1-888-517-EPIC [email protected] APMA Annual Scientific Meeting (The National) ~Tour Options~ Zion National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Depart Salt Lake City and travel to Zion 10am-5pm Zion National Park We will leave Springdale and head in to the park and enjoy our first hike together up to Emerald Pools. This mild warm up is a beautiful loop trail that will take us along a single track trail, past waterfalls and pools of cool blue water all nesting beneath the massive monolith cliffs of Zion. Afterward we will drive up canyon and walk two trails known as the Riverwalk and Big Bend. The Virgin River, descending from the upper plateau, has worked its way over time through the sandstone carving out the main Zion corridor. You’ll be amazed by the stunning views as we walk along the river. Following these hikes, we will stop for lunch at the Zion Lodge which sits in the park. After lunch, we will drive to the eastern side of the park and through the Carmel Tunnel which was carved out of the solid cliff face in the 1920’s. We will start first at Checkerboard Mesa where you can explore the massive sandstone monoliths. Lastly, we walk along the Overlook Trail until we reach the stunning viewpoint overlooking the entire canyon. 5-6pm Dinner 6-10pm Travel to Salt Lake City Arches National Park 1 Day Tour 6-10am Travel from Salt Lake City to Arches National 10am-5pm Arches National Park In Arches National Park, we begin at the Wall Street trail head.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River a NATURAL MENACE BECOMES a NATIONAL RESOURCE ' '
    The Colorado River A NATURAL MENACE BECOMES A NATIONAL RESOURCE ' ' I Comprehensive Report on the Development of ze Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin for rrigation, Power Production, and Other Beneficial Ises in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming By THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J . A . Krug, Secretary SPONSORED BY AND PREPARED UNDER THE GENERAL SUPERVISION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Michael W. Straus, Commissioner E. A. Morit-, Director, Region 3 ; E. O. Larson, Director, Region 4 MARCH 1 946 1P 'A m 4„ M 1i'leming Library Grand Canyon Colleg P . )x 11097 Contents Page PROPOSED REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE Explorations 46 INTERIOR Settlement 48 Page Population 49 Letter of June 6,1946, from the Acting Commissioner, Chapter III . DIVIDING THE WATER 53 3 Bureau of Reclamation Virgin Conditions 55 REGIONAL DIRECTORS' REPORT Early Development of the River 56 Summary of Conditions in the Early 1920's . 59 Map of Colorado River Basin Facing 9 Between the Upper and Lower Basins 59 Scope and Purpose 9 Between United States and Mexico . 66 Authority for the Report 9 DEVELOPING THE BASIN Cooperation and Acknowledgments 9 Chapter IV. 69 Description of Area 10 Upper Basin 72 Problems of the Basin 11 Labor Force 72 Water Supply 12 Land Ownership and Use 73 Division of Water 13 Soils 73 Future Development of Water Resources 13 Agriculture 73 Table I, Present and Potential Stream Depletions in Minerals and Mining 80 the Colorado River Basin 14 Lumbering 85 Potential Projects 14 Manufacturing 86 Table II, Potential Projects in the Colorado River Transportation and Markets .
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin River Rim Trail Access from I-15 Take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North
    Getting There From Cedar City to Te-ah: Approximately 32 miles The Virgin River Rim Trail Access From I-15 take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North. Proceed east The Virgin River Rim Trail winds through 32 miles of some on 200 North for 1 mile to the intersection with Main of the most spectacular scenery southern Utah has to Virgin River The Virgin River Rim Trail can be accessed from several Street. Turn right onto Main Street and head south for 0.2 offer. From stunning pink cliffs, to verdant high altitude points depending on how far, and which direction you wish miles to the intersection with Center Street/University forests, the trail offers a little something for everyone. to travel. Blvd/UT-14. Turn left onto Center Street/UT-14 and Rim Trail continue southeast on UT-14 for 25.3 miles to the junction The trail is long and can be quite rigorous at points so From Strawberry Point N 37° 26.177’ W 112° 42.684’ with Navajo Lake Road/Forest Road #053. Turn right onto most people choose to only enjoy a portion at a time. The From Cascade Falls N 37° 29.837’ W 112° 45.096’ Navajo Lake Road and continue 5.7 miles. After you pass following suggestions are provided to help you find the From Te-ah (Navajo Lake) N 37° 32.020’ W 112° 49.300’ Te-Ah campground but before you take the sweeping left adventure you are looking for during your visit to the Dixie Cedar City From Woods Ranch N 37° 35.643’ W 112° 54.980’ turn to the south you will see a pull out and a trailhead National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River: Lifeline Of
    4 The Colorado River: lifeline of the American Southwest Clarence A. Carlson Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 80523 Robert T. Muth Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 80523 1 Carlson, C. A., and R. T. Muth. 1986. The Colorado River: lifeline of the American Southwest. Can. J. Fish. Aguat. Sci. In less than a century, the wild Colorado River has been drastically and irreversibly transformed into a tamed, man-made system of regulated segments dominated by non-native organisms. The pristine Colorado was characterized by widely fluctuating flows and physico-chemical extremes and harbored unique assemblages of indigenous flora and fauna. Closure of Hoover Dam in 1935 marked the end of the free-flowing river. The Colorado River System has since become one of the most altered and intensively controlled in the United States. Many main-stem and tributary dams, water diversions, and channelized river sections now exist in the basin. Despite having one of - the most arid drainages in the world, the present-day Colorado River supplies more water for consumptive use than any river in the United States. Physical modification of streams and introduction of non-native species have adversely impacted the Colorado's native biota. This paper treats the Colorado River holistically as an ecosystem and summarizes current knowledge on its ecology and management. "In a little over two generations, the wild Colorado has been harnessed by a series of dams strung like beads on a thread from the Gulf of California to the mountains of Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood on the Virgin River, January 1989, in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada
    FLOOD ON THE VIRGIN RIVER, JANUARY 1989, IN UTAH, ARIZONA, AND NEVADA By Darrell D. Carlson and David F. Meyer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4159 Salt Lake City, Utah 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Room 1016 Administration Building Open-File Reports Section 1745 West 1700 South Box 25286, MS 517 Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................................. 1 Description of Quail Creek Reservoir ................................................................................................... 1 Description of the breach of the dike ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity of Surface Water in the Lower Colorado River Salton Sea Area
    Salinity of Surface Water in The Lower Colorado River Salton Sea Area, By BURDGE IRELAN, WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER-SALTON SEA AREA pl. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-E . i V ) 116) P, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract El Ionic budget of the Colorado River from Lees Ferry to Introduction 2 Imperial Dam, 1961-65-Continued General chemical characteristics of Colorado River Tapeats Creek E26 water from Lees Ferry to Imperial Dam 2 Havasu Creek -26 Lees Ferry . 4 Virgin River - 26 Grand Canyon 6 Unmeasured inflow between Grand Canyon and Hoover Dam 8 Hoover Dam 26 Lake Havasu 11 Chemical changes in Lake Mead --- ---- - 26 Imperial Dam ---- - 12 Bill Williams River 27 Mineral burden of the lower Colorado River, 1926-65 - 12 Chemical changes in Lakes Mohave and Havasu ___ 27 Analysis of dissolved-solids loads 13 Diversion to Colorado River aqueduct 27 Analysis of ionic loads ____ - 15 Parker Dam to Imperial Dam 28 Average annual ionic burden of the Colorado River 20 Ionic accounting of principal irrigation areas above Ionic budget of the Colorado River from Lees Ferry to Imperial Dam - __ -------- 28 Imperial Dam, 1961-65 ____- ___ 22 General characteristics of Colorado River water below Lees Ferry 23 Imperial Dam Paria River 23 Ionic budgets for the Colorado River below Imperial Little Colorado River 24 Blue Springs --- 25 Dam and Gila River - 34 Unmeasured inflow from Lees Ferry to Grand Quality of surface water in the Salton Sea basin in Canyon 25 California Grand Canyon 25 Summary of conclusions 39 Bright Angel Creek 25 References ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin River Management Plan & Environmental Assessment, Utah
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Zion National Park State Route 9 Springdale, UT 84767 ERRATA Virgin River Comprehensive Management Plan/Environmental Assessment July 2013 Chapter 1 – Impact Topics Retained for Further Analysis – Table 4. Impact Topics – Page 43 TEXT CHANGES: Impact Topics Analyzed in Detail: Wildlife ORV (including the threatened Mexican spotted owl) Impact Topics Eliminated from Detailed Analysis: Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Plant and Animal Species Chapter 1 – Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Analysis – Page 46 TEXT CHANGES: Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Plant and Animal Species The Endangered Species Act of 1973 requires examination of impacts on all federally listed threatened, endangered, and candidate species. Section 7 of the ESA requires all federal agencies to consult with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by the agency does not jeopardize the continued existence of the listed species or critical habitats. In addition, The 2006 Management Policies and DO-77: Natural Resource Management requires the NPS to examine the impacts on federal candidate species, as well as stated listed species. In 2010 the USFWS directed the National Park Service to their Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) on the internet to obtain a list of species that may occur in project area. The list included the following species: greater sage grouse, Mexican spotted owl, southwestern willow flycatcher, yellow- billed cuckoo, Virgin River chub, woundfin, Gierisch mallow, Jones cycladenia, Las Vegas buckwheat, Shivwits milk-vetch, Welsh’s milkweed, Utah prairie dog, desert tortoise, and California condor. Zion does not have the habitat components to support most of these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Conditions in Utah During 1999-2002: a Historical Perspective
    Drought Conditions in Utah During 1999-2002: A Historical Perspective Soda Springs Introduction 2001, to September 30, 2002): Colorado River Smiths Fork near RiverBear near Cisco, San Juan River near Bluff, and 114° IDAHO Lake Border, Wyoming ° 42° 109 Bear Green Virgin River at Virgin. At two other gages in “When the well is dry, we learn River WYOMING River Logan eastern Utah, Whiterocks River near Whiterocks the worth of water” - Ben Franklin, Bear Green River Evanston Ogden Flaming and Green River near Green River, 2002 was from Poor Richard’s Almanac, 1733 Web Gorge er R Reservoir Great Fork the second driest year on record. Streamflow iv Blacks Salt e r Lake Weber River near Oakley Jordan Salt in the Upper Colorado River Basin has been so River Utah’s weather is prone to extremes—from Lake D City u c h low that the water surface of Lake Powell is severe flooding to multiyear droughts. Five es neR Provo iv Whiterockse River White COLORADO predicted to be 80 feet below the fill level by Utah r major floods occurred during 1952, 1965, 1966, near Whiterocks Lake River r e January 2003 (Bureau of Reclamation, 2002). v 1983, and 1984, and six multiyear droughts i R P n The water level of Lake Powell is currently e NEVADA r occurred during 1896-1905, 1930-36, 1953-65, i e ce r R G iv (2003) low enough near Hite Marina (at the 1974-78 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1991), and UTAH er M u Green River upstream end of the lake) that much of the d more recently during 1988-93 and 1999-2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Water Resource March 1993
    AR! ZONA WATER RESOURCE Volume 2, No. 2 March 1993 CAP Water Quality Strains Municipal Treatment Plants LakePleasant behind the recently completed New Waddell Dam held some 150,000 acre-feet of water prior to the January-February storms. In early January, the Bureau of Reclama- tion asked the CAWCD to hold the elevation of Lake Pleasant constant for 30 days so the stability of the New Waddell Dam could be tested. Instead, the dam received a different, real-world test, as runoff from Janu- ary-February storms increased the volume of Lake Pleasant to nearly 450,000 acre-feet. Reservoir capacity is 800,000 acre-feet. Some of the water captured be- hind the dam would otherwise have contributed to downstream flooding. This year's high quail population ¿s the result ofplentzful rainfall last year. This season 's After the storms subsided, CAWCD abundant rains bode wellfor quail next year.(Photo: UA Ag. Communications) switched from pumped Colorado River water to gravity-fed Lake Pleas- ant water as the source for deliveries Arizona Seeks Share of Virgin River System to municipal customers, thereby saving millions in energy costs (see occurrencesin the relatively undeveloped and lightly populated nohwest continued on page 7 corner of Arizona are not hot items on the state's water management agenda. Yet critical water management issues are to be resolved there, and how they are decided will determine the area's current access to water supplies, its future development potential, and also will affect the natural environment of the area. CONTENTS Northwest Arizona is located near rapidly expanding population centers in neighboring Utah and Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Strip Field Office Chapter 2: the Plan Approved Resource Management Plan
    BLM. 2008. Arizona Strip Field Office Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. Signed January 29, 2008. Arizona Strip Field Office Chapter 2: The Plan Approved Resource Management Plan TABLE 2.13. RECREATION & VISITOR SERVICES/INTERPRETATION & ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION (RR) Decision No. Decision Text Gateways SRMA: 2,246 acres (also falls within the Vermilion Cliffs National Monument boundary) House Rock RMZ: 352 acres Vermilion Cliffs RMZ: 1,894 acres Paria SRMA: 1,413 acres (also falls within the Vermilion Cliffs National Monument boundary) Coyote Buttes RMZ: 1,1413 acres Sand Hills SRMA: 8,503 acres (also falls within the Vermilion Cliffs National Monument boundary) Uplands RMZ: 8,503 acres Arizona Strip ERMA (Extensive): 1, 784,921 acres C. MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Recreation Management Actions Resources To the extent practicable, the natural or ―remote‖ settings in Specialized and Primitive TMAs will be restored and/or maintained using a MA-RR-01 combination of projects and natural processes as the need or opportunity arises. Geocache sites will be relocated with help from local geocachers if, through monitoring, it were determined that important resources are at MA-RR-02 risk of unacceptable change due to use of the site. Signing and Recreation Facilities Major visitor facilities (visitor center or contact stations) will be collaborative efforts with nearby communities, with the exception of the MA-RR-03 Virgin River SRMA where a small contact facility may be considered. Recreation facility development and maintenance will be limited in listed species and other sensitive habitats (See Special Status Species MA-RR-04 and Vegetation Management decisions). Within SRMAs, the levels and types of signing and recreation facility development will be guided by the individual RMZ objectives and the administrative and physical recreation settings components prescribed for each RMZ.
    [Show full text]