Livestock Predation and Its Management in South Africa: a Scientific Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Livestock Predation and Its Management in South Africa: a Scientific Assessment Livestock Predation and its Management in South Africa: A Scientific Assessment Editors Graham Kerley, Sharon Wilson and Dave Balfour 2018 Livestock Predation and its Management in South Africa: a Scientific Assessment Year of publication: 2018 Editors: Graham I. H. Kerley, Sharon L. Wilson and Dave Balfour Publisher: Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University, South Campus, University Way, Summerstrand, Port Elizabeth, South Africa (P O Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa). http://predsa.mandela.ac.za Copyright and permissions: Entire publication © 2018 by Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University Introduction and chapters © 2018 by individual authors Photographs © the named photographers ISBN 978-0-620-78763-5(print) 978-0-620-78764-2(e-book) All rights reserved. Cover photographs clockwise from top left: Merino sheep © Petrus De Wet Cattle © Alicia Campbell Springbok © Sophie Monsarrat Angora goats © A. Blake Hobson of Martyrsford Angora Stud Anatolian guard dog © Janine Cotterell Dorper sheep © Ben-Jon Dreyer Design, layout, typesetting and reproduction by Mike Swanepoel of Design Legends, Port Elizabeth Printing and binding by Valmac Printers Recommended citation: Kerley, G.I.H., Wilson, S.L. & Balfour, D. (Eds) 2018. Livestock Predation and its Management in South Africa: A Scientific Assessment. Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth. Livestock Predation and its Management in South Africa: a Scientific Assessment Edited by Graham I H Kerley, Sharon L Wilson and Dave Balfour Centre for African Conservation Ecology Nelson Mandela University Port Elizabeth South Africa Startup funding provided by iv Foreword GRICULTURE and biodiversity are both key elements of the South African economy. The management and use of livestock in support of society has been a feature of the peoples of southern Africa for over two millennia. TheA production of meat, fibre, skins and other animal products such as milk, on a sustainable and adequate scale are important factors contributing to the economy and food security of the country. A role of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is to provide an enabling regulatory environment for the production of goods and services by the livestock industry. Equally important is the role of the Department of Environmental Affairs to provide a regulatory environment for the management of the natural environment in a manner that enables growth and development today without limiting the options of future generations. The ecosystem goods and services that are provided by the natural environment, along with all the other benefits that humans receive from the biodiversity of our country, play an important role in supporting the lives and economies of every South African. Predators and predation are an important element of the natural landscape and functional ecosystems. The conundrum for society is how to promote both these societal benefits when they appear locked in an unavoidable conflict between each other, livestock production vs natural predator populations in the landscape. The conflict has persisted for thousands of years with no solution; at first glance it seems like a zero sum game. The challenge is for legislators to understand and to formulate policy which is attentive to the needs and benefits of both biodiversity and livestock producers which at the same time seeks to minimize the net overall losses to society. In this historic first (nationally and globally) Scientific Assessment covering the topic of predation on livestock in South Africa, both government departments are being afforded a single document containing detailed and current insight and knowledge on this complex situation as a basis for contemplating policy development. This assessment contributes seamlessly to the government’s strengthening resolve to develop evidence-based policy and to recognise that in many complex situations, such as where there is predation on livestock, there is no silver bullet solution. Rather a process of adaptive management is required. The partnership of government, industry, stakeholders and leading researchers that emerged to resource and formulate this Scientific Assessment provides evidence of the broad and strong commitment to address the conflicts around livestock predation management. We are confident that this Scientific Assessment will set the stage for improved policy formulation and management of livestock predation in South Africa, thereby reducing conflict around this issue and contributing to sustaining both agricultural production and biodiversity. We thank all the role players who have made this possible. Bomo Edith Edna Molewa Senzeni S Zokwana MP: Minister of Environmental Affairs MP: Minister of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries v Authors Babatopie E. Akinyemi Nico L. Avenant Dave Balfour Kevin G. Behrens Andre J. Botha Nicole Broadbent Jane Carruthers Harriet Davies-Mostert Marius Diemont Emmanuel Do Linh San Marine Drouilly Lihle Dumalisile J. Jurie du Plessis Elisa Galgut Jillian Gardner Jan Glazewski Heidi-Jayne Hawkins M. Axel Hunnicutt Graham I.H. Kerley Kelly Marnewick Haemish I.A.S. Melville Liaan Minnie Ntuthuko R. Mkhize Motsamai Molefe Desley Fahlaza Monaledi Lana Müller Nkabeng Maruping Mzileni Nicoli Nattrass M. Justin O’Riain Daniel M. Parker Gail Potgieter Phillip R.K. Richardson Sieglinde C. Rode Igshaan Samuels Michael J. Somers Lourens H. Swanepoel Marion Tafani Craig J. Tambling Julius Tjelele Jane K. Turpie Niel Viljoen Sharon L. Wilson vi Author Biosketches The identified topics (i.e. the chapters and their contents) of this assessment were addressed by multi- author teams that included one Lead Author, several Authors and Contributing Authors. Authors were drawn from a range of sectors and regions of South Africa and together represented a balance of expertise and perspectives for each of the topics. These authors are listed below, with abridged biographies, their affiliations and email address. Babatopie E. Akinyemi (PhD) is a Post-doctoral fellow and lecturer in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension at the University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa. He holds B. Agric. Tech (Hons), M.Sc Agric and PhD in Agricultural Economics, from The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria, University of Ibadan, Nigeria and University of Fort Hare, South Africa, respectively. His research focuses on the effects of land fragmentation on technical efficiency of farmers in Nigeria, rural household willingness to pay for community-based ecotourism in Wild Coast, South Africa and prevalence of NEET status among rural youths and drivers of youth participation in agricultural activities in South Africa. Affiliation: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Nico L. Avenant (PhD) is Curator, Senior Specialist Scientist and HOD in the Department of Mammalogy at the National Museum in Bloemfontein. He is also a Research Fellow, post-graduate Supervisor and Guest Lecturer at the University of the Free State. His research interests include small mammal ecology, with a specific focus on predator- prey relations and the management of mesopredators. Affiliation: National Museum and Centre for Environmental Management, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Dave Balfour (PhD) is an ecologist with wide ranging interests and a focus on ecological processes, larger mammals and conservation governance. He is member of the IUCN/SSC African Rhino and African Elephant Specialist Groups and has extensive experience working at the interface between science and protected area management. He currently consults on a freelance basis. Affiliation: Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Kevin G. Behrens (D Litt et Phil) is an associate professor at the Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics at the University of the Witwatersrand. His research interests lie in the area of applied ethics, in particular in bioethics and environmental ethics. A major emphasis in his work is on applying African moral philosophical notions to ethical questions. Affiliation: Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] vii AUTHOR BIOSKETCHES Andre J. Botha (BTech) is a Special Projects Manager at the Endangered Wildlife Trust where his primary focus is the conservation of African vultures and reducing the impact of wildlife poisoning. He is also the Overarching Coordinator for the drafting of the CMS Conservation Multi-species Action Plan for African-Eurasian Vultures and the co-chair of the IUCN SSC Vulture Specialist Group. Affiliation: The Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Nicole Broadbent (MPhil) is an environmental ethicist, completing a PhD on African wildlife ethics. Her research interests include human-wildlife conflict management, captive wildlife management ethics, and human-animal interaction theory. Affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Jane Carruthers (PhD) is Emeritus Professor at UNISA and an internationally renowned environmental historian who has extensively researched protected areas and the rise
Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of KWAZULU-NATAL the Impact of Corruption In
    UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL The impact of corruption in recruitment and procurement within local government and its impact on service delivery, using the KwaZulu-Natal department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs as a case study. by Ngqapheli Mchunu (211519064) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Master of Social Sciences (Political Science) in the School of Social Sciences, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg. Supervisor: Dr. Siyabonga Dlamini November 2018 TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................v ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER ONE .......................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................1 1.1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Background and outline of research problem ....................................................................2 1.3 Theoretical Framework.......................................................................................................4 1.4 Research Design ..................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Zimbabwe and South Africa
    FACEBOOK, YOUTH AND POLITICAL ACTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ZIMBABWE AND SOUTH AFRICA A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM AND MEDIA STUDIES, RHODES UNIVERSITY by Admire Mare September 2015 ABSTRACT This comparative multi-sited study examines how, why and when politically engaged youths in distinctive national and social movement contexts use Facebook to facilitate political activism. As part of the research objectives, this study is concerned with investigating how and why youth activists in Zimbabwe and South Africa use the popular corporate social network site for political purposes. The study explores the discursive interactions and micro- politics of participation which plays out on selected Facebook groups and pages. It also examines the extent to which the selected Facebook pages and groups can be considered as alternative spaces for political activism. It also documents and analyses the various kinds of political discourses (described here as digital hidden transcripts) which are circulated by Zimbabwean and South African youth activists on Facebook fan pages and groups. Methodologically, this study adopts a predominantly qualitative research design although it also draws on quantitative data in terms of levels of interaction on Facebook groups and pages. Consequently, this study engages in data triangulation which allows me to make sense of how and why politically engaged youths from a range of six social movements in Zimbabwe and South Africa use Facebook for political action. In terms of data collection techniques, the study deploys social media ethnography (online participant observation), qualitative content analysis and in-depth interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum of Animal Law Studies) 2019, Vol
    dA.Derecho Animal (Forum of Animal Law Studies) 2019, vol. 10/1 35-58 Animal Law in South Africa: “Until the lions have their own lawyers, the 1 law will continue to protect the hunter” Amy P. Wilson Attorney. LL.M Animal Law Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, USA Director and Co-founder Animal Law Reform South Africa Received: December 2018 Accepted: January 2019 Recommended citation. WILSON A.P., Animal Law in South Africa: “Until the lions have their own lawyers, the law will continue to protect the hunter”dA. Derecho Animal (Forum of Animal Law Studies) 10/1 (2019) - DOI https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.399 Abstract Despite the importance of animals to South Africa, animal law is not yet recognized a separate distinct area of law. In an attempt to rectify this, the article provides a high level introduction to this highly complex field. By providing background and context into historical and current injustices regarding humans and animals, it alleges that the current legal system has failed to provide adequate protection to either group. By analyzing the existing regulatory framework and case law, it lays out the realities of obtaining better protection for animals in law. It then argues why it is particularly critical for the country to consider animal interests both individually and collectively with human interests by providing examples of how these interests intersect in practice. It suggests an approach for future protection efforts and concludes by providing some opportunities going forward for animal law reform in South Africa. Keywords: Animal law; South Africa; animals; animal protection; law; human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2008 Violence Against Foreign Nationals in South Africa
    MAYY 2000088 VIIOLLEENCE AGGAAIINNSSTT FOORREEIIGGNN NNAATTIOONNAALLSS IINN SSOUTTHH AAFRRICCAA UNNDDEERSSTANNDDINNGG CCAAUUSSEES AANNDD EEVVAALUUAATTIINNG REESPPONNSSEESS By Jean Pierre Misago, Tamlyn Monson, Tara Polzer and Loren Landau April 2010 Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) and Forced Migration Studies Programme MAY 2008 VIOLENCE AGAINST FOREIGN NATIONALS IN SOUTH AFRICA: UNDERSTANDING CAUSES AND EVALUATING RESPONSES Jean Pierre Misago, Tamlyn Monson, Tara Polzer and Loren Landau Forced Migration Studies Programme (FMSP), University of the Witwatersrand and Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) April 2010 2 This research report was produced by the FORCED MIGRATION STUDIES PROGRAMME at the University of the Witwatersrand. The report was written by Jean Pierre Misago, Tamlyn Monson and Tara Polzer. The research was conducted by Jean Pierre Misago, Tamlyn Monson, Vicki Igglesden, Dumisani Mngadi, Gugulethu Nhlapo, Khangelani Moyo, Mpumi Mnqapu and Xolani Tshabalala. This report was funded by the Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) with support from Oxfam GB and Atlantic Philanthropies South Africa. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion in the report are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oxfam GB. Based in Johannesburg, the Forced Migration Studies Programme (FMSP) is an internationally engaged; Africa-oriented and Africa-based centre of excellence for research and teaching that helps shape global discourse on migration; aid and social transformation. The Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) is the South African national network of organisations working with refugees and migrants. For more information about the FMSP see www.migration.org.za .
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Consistency of Animal Equality
    1 The ethical consistency of animal equality Stijn Bruers, Sept 2013, DRAFT 2 Contents 0. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 5 0.1 SUMMARY: TOWARDS A COHERENT THEORY OF ANIMAL EQUALITY ........................................................................ 9 1. PART ONE: ETHICAL CONSISTENCY ......................................................................................................... 18 1.1 THE BASIC ELEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 18 a) The input data: moral intuitions .......................................................................................................... 18 b) The method: rule universalism............................................................................................................. 20 1.2 THE GOAL: CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE ..................................................................................................... 27 1.3 THE PROBLEM: MORAL ILLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 30 a) Optical illusions .................................................................................................................................... 30 b) Moral illusions ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wild at Heart the Cruelty of the Exotic Pet Trade Left: an African Grey Parrot with a Behavioural Feather-Plucking Problem, a Result of Suffering in Captivity
    Wild at heart The cruelty of the exotic pet trade Left: An African grey parrot with a behavioural feather-plucking problem, a result of suffering in captivity. Wildlife. Not Pets. The exotic pet trade is one of the biggest threats to millions of Everyone, from our supporters and pet-owners to the wider wild animals. World Animal Protection’s new Wildlife. Not public has an important role to play in protecting millions of Pets campaign aims to disrupt this industry and to protect wild wild animals from terrible suffering. We will work together animals from being poached from the wild and bred into to uncover and build awareness of this suffering, and take cruel captivity, just to become someone’s pet. action to stop the cruelty. This campaign builds on sustained successful campaigning Companies, governments and international trade to protect wild animals from the cruel wildlife tourism industry. organisations involved in the wildlife pet trade, whether Since 2015, over 1.6 million people around the globe have wittingly or not, all have a crucial role to play. They can cut taken action to move the travel industry. TripAdvisor and out illegal wildlife crimes, and they can do more to protect other online travel platforms have committed to stop profiting wild animals from this cruellest of trades. from wildlife cruelty. Over 200 travel companies worldwide have pledged to become elephant and wildlife-friendly. Now is the time to turn the tide on the exotic pet trade and keep wild animals in the wild, where they belong. Wildlife. Not Pets focuses a global spotlight on the booming global trade in wild animals kept as pets at home, also known as ‘exotic pets’.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Farms, Stigma and Harm
    animals Article Wildlife Farms, Stigma and Harm Jessica Bell Rizzolo Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; [email protected] Received: 25 August 2020; Accepted: 28 September 2020; Published: 1 October 2020 Simple Summary: Wildlife farming is a practice where wild animals are legally bred for consumption in a manner similar to agricultural animals. This is a controversial conservation practice that also has implications for animal welfare and human livelihoods. However, most work on wildlife farming has focused solely on conservation or animal welfare rather than considering all of these ethical factors simultaneously. This paper uses interview data with academics to analyze (a) the harms and benefits of wildlife farms and (b) how wildlife farms are labeled detrimental (stigmatized) or acceptable. Results indicate that consideration of the harms and benefits of wildlife farms incorporate conservation, animal welfare, scale disparities between sustenance and commercial farms, consumer preferences, species differences, the dynamics of demand for wildlife products, and governance. Whether wildlife farms are stigmatized or accepted is influenced by different social constructions of the term “wildlife farm”, if there is a stigma around use of a species, a form of production, or the perceived quality of a wildlife product, cultural differences, consumer preferences, geopolitical factors, and demand reduction efforts. This paper discusses how the ethics of wildlife farms are constructed and how shifts in context can alter the ethical repercussions of wildlife farms. Abstract: Wildlife farming, the commercial breeding and legal sale of non-domesticated species, is an increasingly prevalent, persistently controversial, and understudied conservation practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Information on Attitudes Toward Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and Management: a Survey of the Chinese Public
    animals Article The Impact of Information on Attitudes toward Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and Management: A Survey of the Chinese Public Zhifan Song 1,† , Qiang Wang 2,†, Zhen Miao 1 , Kirsten Conrad 3, Wei Zhang 1,*, Xuehong Zhou 1,* and Douglas C. MacMillan 4 1 College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (Z.M.) 2 Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China; [email protected] 3 International Association for Wildlife, Gungahlin, Canberra, ACT 2912, Australia; [email protected] 4 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (X.Z.) † Equal contributions. Simple Summary: The widespread dissemination of information related to wildlife utilization in new online media and traditional media undoubtedly impacts societal conservation concepts and attitudes, thus triggering public discussions on the relationship between conservation and utilization. In this study, questionnaires were distributed in seven major geographic regions of Chinese mainland Citation: Song, Z.; Wang, Q.; Miao, to investigate the public’s awareness and agreement with information related to the utilization of Z.; Conrad, K.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; wildlife in order to measure the impact of information on various issues relating wildlife conservation MacMillan, D.C. The Impact of and utilization. The Chinese public had the greatest awareness and agreement with information Information on Attitudes toward that prevents unsustainable and illegal utilization, and the least awareness and agreement with Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and information that promotes unsustainable utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Futures: Aspirations and Actions Regarding Form and Spatial Change in Johannesburg
    (Newman 2008) Adinistrator SPATIAL FUTURES: ASPIRATIONS AND ACTIONS REGARDING FORM AND SPATIAL CHANGE IN JOHANNESBURG A report for Group Strategy, Policy Coordination and Relations, City of Johannesburg Prof. Alison Todes, Dr. Sarah Charlton, Dr. Margot Rubin, Alexandra Appelbaum and Prof. Philip Harrison Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. MANAGING URBAN SPATIAL FORM: COMPACT CITY DEBATES, SUSTAINABILITY AND MOBILITY ... 6 2.1 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 THE SOUTH AFRICAN AND JOHANNESBURG DEBATE AND EXPERIENCE ............................................................ 10 3. SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND SPATIAL JUSTICE ................................................................................... 16 3.1 PRIVATISED AND SPLINTERING URBANISM ............................................................................................ 16 3.2 GATED COMMUNITIES ...................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 SAFETY AND SECURITY AS A DRIVER OF SPATIAL CHANGE ........................................................................ 24 3.4 GENTRIFICATION IN THE INNER CITY .................................................................................................... 27 3.5 RIGHT TO THE CITY AND SPATIAL JUSTICE ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Welfare Consciousness of Chinese College Students: Findings and Analysis
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 3-2005 Animal Welfare Consciousness of Chinese College Students: Findings and Analysis Zu Shuxian Anhui Medical University Peter J. Li University of Houston-Downtown Pei-Feng Su Independent Animal Welfare Consultant Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/socatani Recommended Citation Shuxian, Z., Li, P. J., & Su, P. F. (2005). Animal welfare consciousness of Chinese college students: findings and analysis. China Information, 19(1), 67-95. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Animal Welfare Consciousness of Chinese College Students: Findings and Analysis Zu Shuxian1, Peter J. Li2, and Pei-Feng Su3 1 Anhui Medical University 2 University of Houston-Downtown 3 Independent Animal Welfare Consultant KEYWORDS college students, cultural change, animal welfare consciousness ABSTRACT The moral character of China’s single-child generation has been studied by Chinese researchers since the early 1990s. Recent acts of animal cruelty by college students turned this subject of academic inquiry into a topic of public debate. This study joins the inquiry by asking if the perceived unique traits of the single-child generation, i.e. self- centeredness, lack of compassion, and indifference to the feelings of others, are discernible in their attitudes toward animals. Specifically, the study investigates whether the college students are in favor of better treatment of animals, objects of unprecedented exploitation on the Chinese mainland. With the help of two surveys conducted in selected Chinese universities, this study concludes that the college students, a majority of whom belong to the single-child generation, are not morally compromised.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Market Reform in Southern Africa
    REPORT ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA MARCH 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report was produced by Promethium South Africa, IPP Office, South African Carbon during the course of a research Independent Power Producers Association, project titled Electricity Market Reform in South African Wind Energy Association, Southern Africa, funded by the British High Standard Bank); Swaziland (Swaziland Commission in Pretoria, South Africa. The Electricity Company); Zambia (Copperbelt objective of the project is to identify Energy Corporation, Lunsemfwa Hydro electricity market reforms that are currently Power Company); Zimbabwe (British underway in the Southern African Embassy Harare, Counterfactual, Development Community region. Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries and the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority) This Report was informed by inputs from and the Southern African Power Pool. various organisations, institutes, government departments in the member states of ENSafrica have contributed to the Southern African Development Community interpretation and understanding of the legal including: Botswana (British High infrastructure, especially with respect to the Commission in Gaborone, Cenkal, South African legislative framework. Department of Energy and Kalahari Energy); Lesotho (Lesotho Energy and Water Authority); Malawi (Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority); Mozambique (Aggreko Mozambique, Department for International Development Mozambique and Fundo de Energia); Namibia (NamPower); South Africa (Cennergi, Department of Trade and Industry, Eskom, Industrial Development Corporation of ii Goal 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The topic of this research report is sufficient and in several cases countries electricity market reform. In the broadest expressed the intension to be net exporters sense it is about how the electricity supply of electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004 Report Annual
    cover_ARP 1.7.2005 9:15 Page 1 annual report 2004 implementation of activities and use of funds annual report report annual 2004 OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ANNUAL REPORT 2004 The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Palais des Nations - CH-1211 Geneva 10 - Switzerland Telephone: 41 22/917 90 00 - Fax: 41 22/917 90 08 Web site: www.ohchr.org human rights RA 2004_ARP.qxd 1.7.2005 8:55 Page 1 ANNUAL report 2004 RA 2004_ARP.qxd 1.7.2005 8:55 Page 2 OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Prepared by the Resource Mobilization Unit of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Editorial Consultant: Andrew Lawday Design and Desktop Publishing by Latitudesign, Geneva Printed by Atar SA, Geneva Photographs: UNICEF/HQ02-0209/Nicole Toutounji; UN/186591C; UNICEF/HQ98-0441/Roger LeMoyne; UNICEF/HQ00-639/Roger LeMoyne; UN/153474C; UNICEF/HQ00-0761/Donna De Cesare; UN/148384C; UNICEF/HQ97-0525/Maggie Murray-Lee; UN/153752C. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. RA 2004_ARP.qxd 1.7.2005 8:55 Page 3 Table of contents Introduction by the High Commissioner . 5 EUROPE, CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS .
    [Show full text]