2. Transportation in Three Nordic Cross-Border Regions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Connecting Sweden to Europe Making International Rail Travel a Reality
Connecting Sweden to Europe Making international rail travel a reality 1:28 Contents About Summary Summary ....................................................... 1 Customer: Jakop Dalunde 2021 will be the European Year of Rail. It is high time Forword ........................................................ 2 to lay the foundation of how to increase international Authors: Stephan Bösch Background and Scope ................................. 3 rail travel in Europe. The purpose of this report is to present facts that point to the shortcomings that exist PG Andersson Existing Market ............................................. 5 within the EU when it comes to cross-border rail Missing Links .............................................. 10 services as well as to identify the low hanging fruits that Mats Améen A Closer Look at the Öresund Links ............. 16 may exist concerning ”missing links” across borders Christer Ljungberg within the EU. The report focuses on the northern part Policies today .............................................. 19 of Europe which is defined as Scandinavia and Version: 1.0 Market Access............................................. 22 Germany, and to some extent the neighbouring Six Policy Suggestions ................................. 25 countries of Germany. Report nr: 2020:169 The report concludes with six policy suggestions, Date: 2021-01-23 concerning track fees, availability of tickets, passenger rights, and missing links. Consultants: Trivector Traffic The overall picture is that many administrative -
Var Med Och Forma Centrala Södra Helsingborgs Framtid
Var med och forma centrala södra Helsingborgs framtid Be involved in shaping the future of central southern Helsingborg Tävlingsrapport från projekttävlingen för H+ Imagine Helsingborg Competition report from the project competition for H+ 2009-05-15 Imagine Helsingborg Var med och forma centrala södra Helsingborgs framtid Be involved in shaping the future of central southern Helsingborg Imagine Helsingborg Imagine Tävlingsrapport från projekttävlingen för H+ Imagine Helsingborg Imagine Helsingborg Competition report from Tävlingsrapport från projekttävlingen för H+ – Imagine Helsingborg the project competition for H+ ISBN 978-91-633-4793-1 2009-05-15 Competition report from the project competition for H+ – Imagine Helsingborg från projekttävlingen för H+ – Imagine Helsingborg Tävlingsrapport competition for H+ – Imagine Helsingborg the project from Competition report Imagine Helsingborg h+_rapport_cover_final.indd 1 12/05/09 16:14:15 Imagine Helsingborg Rapport från projekttävlingen Competition report Innehållsförteckning Table of contents Inledning / Introduction 5 Bakgrund / Background 7 1 H+projektet / The H+ project 9 Vision Beskrivning av området / Description of the area Tidsplan / Time frame Tänk Helsingborg / Imagine Helsingborg 29 Projekttävling / Project competition Process Uppgiften / The task 39 Förutsättningar för uppgiften / Prerequisites for the task Teamens förslag / The team proposals 49 2 H+ Mindzone 49 H+ Open Stage 67 Helsingborg Our Vision 85 The Tolerant City 103 Towards Sustainable Urbanity 121 Juryns utvärdering / The jury s evaluation 139 3 Generella kommentarer / General comments 140 Juryns beslut / The jury s decision 146 Utvärdering av förslag / Evaluation of proposals 148 Slutsatser och fortsatt arbete / Conclusions and continued work 158 Inledning Introduction H+ kan liknas vid en fascinerande resa in i framtiden. -
Read the Executive Summary of the Bottleneck Analysis Here
STRING bottleneck analysis for the stretch Oslo – Hamburg Prepared by KombiConsult GmbH (lead partner), Ramboll Norway, Ramboll Sweden and Ramboll Denmark Summary February 2021 Seamless transportation is a prerequisite 1 for growth A high-quality transport infrastructure with sufficient capacity and which is managed efficiently is fundamental for the competitiveness of the economies of the Member States of the European Union (EU). The EU has been contributing to ensure the goal above, amongst other instruments1, through the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) policy. The primary objective for The EU “is to establish a complete and integrated trans-European transport network, covering all Member States and regions and providing the basis for the balanced development of all transport modes in order to facilitate their respective advantages, and thereby maximising the value added for Europe”. The STRING stretch is an integral part of the TEN-T Core Network Corridor Scandinavian-Mediterranean (Scan-Med)2 and already shows a high quality, today. However, and in particular with view on the envisaged completion of the Scan-Med corridor by 2030, still some gaps are expected to remain from today's point of view. Transport and infrastructure bottlenecks can affect the normal flow of transportation, causing unnecessarily long travel times, delays, congestions, costs etc. KombiConsult GmbH and Rambøll have analysed the existing bottlenecks in the STRING - geography outlining future recommended priorities. This paper is a summary of the main findings of the analysis. 1 The White paper 2011 “Roadmap to a single European Transport Area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport systems with the goal of “A 50% shift of medium distance intercity passenger and freight journeys from road to rail and waterborne transport”. -
Special Eastern Europe and Baltic States Supplement
International 15 · 16 | 12 April 2013 www.transportjournal.com Transport Journal ENGLISH EDITION (also available in an identical ITJ German and French version) Special Eastern Europe and Baltic States Supplement Small becomes big How small shippers benefit from NVOCCs 15 Big becomes easy Safely packing industrial plant equipment 32 Easy to become bigger Port of Felixstowe doubling rail capacities 39 Your full truck loads in ONE hand TheEuropeanTransportOrganisation International Transport Journal 15-16 2013 Contents 3 | 15 ·16 12 ApRil 2013 English edition Special in this issue 5 Editorial EASTERN EUROPE & BALTIC STATES Eastern Europe & Baltic States Supplement 6 People & Companies 12 Shipping & Ports 13 New container terminal in Rotterdam First crane for Maasvlakte II 16 Growing container volumes Singapore the workhorse 18 Inland shipping on the Mississippi New intermodal terminal in New Orleans 19 Aviation 19 Houston and Dallas airports Global aviation industry heading for Texas 20 Globe Air Cargo Switzerland Great expectations 19 Agents of growth Two new airports that are also interesting for 21 Forwarding & Logistics airfreight were opened in March, one in Quito 21 Pharmaceuticals logistics•Packaging and one in Sri Lanka. A different fate befell an Sensitive goods securely packed old new project in Doha, where a grand opening 25 Augustin Quehenberger Group Cautiously optimistic scheduled for 1 April was postponed. 28 Road Haulage/Intermodal 28 K+N Munich now a 24plus system partner Gateway to Southeastern Europe Not hazarding a guess 23 31 Change of transalpine rail service providers Drama at the Gotthard The manufacturers of hazardous goods have to 32 Packaging adhere to many a rule and regulation when ware- 32 Packaging industrial equipment housing their wares. -
Scandria®2Act Strategic Corridor and Urban Node Dialogue Meeting – Region Skåne
Scandria®2Act Strategic Corridor and Urban Node Dialogue Meeting – Region Skåne WP4 Scandria Corridor Governance; activity 4.2:Strategic Corridor Node Dialogue Partner: Region Skåne Venue Hotel Clarion, Hyllie Date 12 February 2018 Participants Pat Cox, Scan Med Core Network Corridor Jakop Dalunde (MP), Member of the European Parliament Rikard Larsson (S), Member of the Swedish Parliament, The Committee on Transport Mätta Ivarsson (MP), Chairman of the Regional Development Board, Region Skåne Katrin Stjernfeldt Jammeh (S), Mayor of Malmö Lennart Andersson, Director Swedish Transport Administration South, Swedish Transport Administration Gunnar Eriksson, Head of Department, Transport Analysis Daniel Persson, Deputy Director of Regional Development, Region Skåne Stina Nilsson, Infrastructure Strategist, Region Skåne Scandria Corridor Governance; activity 4.2: Urban Corridor Node Dialogue Partner: Region Skåne Venue Regionhuset, Dockplatsen 26, Malmö Date 26 November 2018 Participants Bengt Nilsson, Infrastructure Strategist, Region Skåne Nicolas Cronberg, Infrastructure Strategist, Region Skåne Stina Nilsson, Infrastructure Strategist, Region Skåne Petra Stelling, Ph.D., Infrastructure Strategist, Region Skåne Jonas Brantefors, Coordinator GREAT, Region Skåne Emmy Harlid Westholm, Development Strategist, EU & International Relations, Region Skåne Maria Lindbom Senior Adviser, EU & International Relations, Region Skåne Elin Malm, Development Strategist, EU & International Relations, Region Skåne 1 | 8 Corridor and Urban node dialogue summary The urban node dialogue process in Skåne was initiated by Region Skåne in February 2018 in the form of a round table discussion together with Mr. Pat Cox, European Commission Coordinator of the Scan Med corridor and politicians at different levels (EU, national, regional and local MEP) as well as high level civil servants at national transport authorities. -
Transport and Infrastructure Connectivity Bottleneck Analysis for the Stretch Oslo ‐ Hamburg
Transport and infrastructure connectivity bottleneck analysis for the stretch Oslo ‐ Hamburg for STRING Network prepared by KombiConsult GmbH (lead partner) Ramboll Norway Ramboll Sweden Ramboll Denmark Final Version 10th February 2021 Page 1 of 59 Contents 1 Background of the Report ............................................................................................................... 3 2 The existing Infrastructure .............................................................................................................. 4 3 The Bottlenecks ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Definition of Bottlenecks ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Non‐Compliance with TEN‐T Regulation Requirements ....................................................... 13 3.3 Further Identified Bottlenecks .............................................................................................. 25 4 The Measures and Projects Eliminating Bottlenecks .................................................................... 31 5 Recommendations / critical issues / what still needs to be done ................................................. 40 5.1 Impact of envisaged projects / measures ............................................................................. 40 5.2 What needs to be done in addition ...................................................................................... -
A Sustainable Development Project for the Future of Sweden
The European Corridor – a sustainable development project for the future of Sweden Oslo Land- vetter Göteborg Vårgårda Borås Ulricehamn Helsingör Linköping Arlanda Norrköping Jönköping Mjölby Helsingborg Värnamo Nyköping Ljungby Vaggeryd KKöpen-öpen- Stockholm Høje hahamnmn ÖrkelljungÅstorp a Taastrup Kastr Åstorp NykNykøbingøbing F u Hamburg p Lund MalMalmömö Lübeck The European Corridor region consists = Götalandsbanan of all existing infrastructure in South and = Europabanan Central Sweden as a whole, with the addition of the new high speed railways, the European Line and the = Southern Main Line Götaland Line. = Regionals lines and other line s = European roads AFIKBYRÅN GR NSKA SVE www.europakorridoren.se Reduce the size of the regions – expand the European Corridor There are numerous examples of how THE EUROPEAN CORRIDOR is the region Fundamentally, this concerns the investments in better communications, that extends from Mälardalen and Stockholm competitiveness of Sweden and the rest of including roads, railways, ports and IT, have through Jönköping and Gothenburg to the Nordic countries – in a world with an provided people and businesses with better Copenhagen and Hamburg. increasingly internationalised economy. accessibility. To jobs and education, to larger This is where two new railways – the The European Corridor means that towns, markets and new business opportunities. European Line and the Götaland Line – are municipalities and regions throughout the This is how we are creating an important going to be the arteries in a transport system elongated corridor will come closer to each prerequisite for increased growth. that will link together Sweden, the Nordic other – as a result of the considerable time region and continental Europe. -
Strategic Node Dialogue Policy Document
Scandria®Corridor Final Status Report Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 Scandria®Alliance Policy Document “Strategic Corridor-Node Dialogue” Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 “Sustainable and Multimodal Transport Actions in the Scandinavian-Adriatic Corridor” Work Package WP 4 – Scandria®Corridor Governance Activity WP 4.2 –Scandria®Corridor Strategic Corridor-Node Dialogue Responsible Partner Joint Spatial Planning Department Berlin-Brandenburg Author KombiConsult: Klaus-Uwe Sondermann Version 2.0 Date 30.04.2019 Status Final Version 2.0, 2019-04-30 » I | V Scandria®Corridor Final Status Report Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Overview of project partners active in WP4 .......................................................................... 6 Figure 1-2: Overview of workpackage activities ...................................................................................... 7 Figure 2-1: Overview of the Urban Node Dialogue Meetings .................................................................. 8 Figure 2-2: Overview of the Urban Node Dialogue Meetings documentation on the website ................ 9 Figure 2-3: Key qualifiers of four development corridors in Southern Finland ...................................... 16 Figure 3-1: Geographical coverage of the Corridor Urban Node Dialogue meetings ........................... 34 Figure 3-2: Thematic coverage of the Corridor Urban Node Dialogue meetings .................................. 35 Figure 3-3: Thematic coverage of the Corridor