DOCSLIB.ORG

Fy 2015 Fy 2016 Fy 2017 Fy 2018 Fy 2019 Fy 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fy 2015 Fy 2016 Fy 2017 Fy 2018 Fy 2019 Fy 2020 Projected Rates and Charges Analyses for Airline Negotiations Commonwealth Ports Authority Saipan International Airport, Rota International Airport, Tinian International Airport PREPARED BY: RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC. 105 East Fourth Street, Suite 1700 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 651-4700 (phone) (513) 412-3570 (facsimile) Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (R&A) prepared this document for the stated purposes as expressly set forth herein and for the sole use of the Commonwealth Ports Authority and its intended recipients. The techniques and methodologies used in preparing this document are consistent with industry practices at the time of preparation. Ricondo & Associates, Inc. is not registered as a municipal advisor under Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and R&A does not provide financial advisory services within the meaning of such Act. PRELIMINARY DRAFT Page 1 of 28 PREPARED ON 11/04/2015 1.1 Introduction This document has been created to expedite the process of negotiating a new Airline-Airport Use and Lease Agreement (New Agreement) between Commonwealth Ports Authority (the Authority) and the airlines serving Saipan International Airport, Rota International Airport, and Tinian International Airport (collectively known as “the Airport System”). This document is for discussion purposes only. Neither the Authority nor any of the airlines will be bound by any of the provisions of this document until a mutually acceptable, comprehensive written Agreement has been fully negotiated, executed and delivered. Airlines that execute the Agreement will be known as Signatory Airlines (Airlines). This document presents projected airlines rates and charges resulting from the operation of the Airports by the Authority. The projected airline rates and charges methodology presented herein is based on the provisions and articles in the Agreement and incorporates the estimated rates and charges impacts associated with both the day-to-day operations of the Airports, as well as undertaking capital projects during the time period covered in this document. Included in this document are revenues and expenses for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Budget and Projected FY 2017 through FY 2020 (the Projection Period). The Authority’s FY is the twelve-month period ending September 30th in each year. These projections are based on a review of historical financial operations, estimated future aviation activity levels, discussions with Authority staff and the impacts of the projected Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This report also includes estimated airlines rates and charges, airline cost per enplanement, Airport cash flow, and debt service coverage for the Series A 1998 bonds. The Authority is proposing, through the rates and charges formulas presented herein, a business agreement with the Airlines that is primarily “compensatory” in nature. It is recognized by the Authority that, with the current financial circumstances in which the Airlines are operating, along with transitioning to operating and maintaining a new airport facility, the business arrangement should reflect the fact that both the Airlines and the Authority are working together to provide adequate facilities at the Airports that do not create an unreasonable burden to the Airlines financially. The proposed business arrangement includes the following key elements. A “cost center residual” landing fee rate for the Airfield Cost Center using total landed weight as the divisor. A “cost center compensatory” average terminal rental rate for the Terminal Cost Center using total rentable square feet as the divisor. Cost centers have been developed that are consistent with industry practices. As a result of these assumptions and other described later in this report, the projected impacts to the Airlines for Budget FY 2016 and the Projection Period under the proposed Agreement are shown in Table 1. PRELIMINARY DRAFT Page 2 of 28 PREPARED ON 11/04/2015 Table 1 Rates and Charges Summary (Fiscal Year Ending September 30) Estimated Budget PROJECTED FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Old Methodology Rates: Facility Service Charges Saipan Main Terminal: Signatory - Per Enplaned Passenger $9.07 Nonsignatory - Per Enplaned Passenger (150%) $13.61 Signatory - Per Deplaned Passenger $2.20 Nonsignatory - Per Deplaned Passenger (150%) $3.30 Saipan Commuter Terminal: Signatory - Per Enplaned Passenger $3.35 Nonsignatory - Per Enplaned Passenger (125%) $4.19 Rota: Signatory - Per Enplaned Passenger $4.95 Nonsignatory - Per Enplaned Passenger (150%) $6.19 Tinian: Signatory - Per Enplaned Passenger $4.95 Nonsignatory - Per Enplaned Passenger (150%) $6.19 Landing Fee Saipan Main Terminal: Signatory $2.02 Nonsignatory (150%) $3.03 Saipan Commuter Terminal: Signatory $1.40 Nonsignatory (125%) $1.75 Rota: Signatory - Commuter $1.06 Nonsignatory (125%) - Commuter $1.33 Tinian: Signatory - Commuter $1.06 Nonsignatory (125%) - Commuter $1.33 Debt Service Coverage 2.26 Cost Per Enplanement $14.90 New Methodology Rates: Terminal Rental Rate Average Rental Rate (per square foot) $41.24 $42.89 $44.66 $46.44 $48.33 Saipan Main: Average Signatory Rental Rate (per square foot) $44.40 $46.18 $48.08 $50.00 $52.03 Average Nonsignatory Rental Rate - 125% (per square foot) $55.50 $57.72 $60.10 $62.50 $65.04 Saipan Commuter: 50% DISCOUNT Average Signatory Rental Rate (per square foot) $22.20 $23.09 $24.04 $25.00 $26.02 Average Nonsignatory Rental Rate - 125% (per square foot) $27.75 $28.86 $30.05 $31.25 $32.52 Rota: 50% DISCOUNT Average Signatory Rental Rate (per square foot) $22.20 $23.09 $24.04 $25.00 $26.02 Average Nonsignatory Rental Rate - 125% (per square foot) $27.75 $28.86 $30.05 $31.25 $32.52 Tinian: 50% DISCOUNT Average Signatory Rental Rate (per square foot) $22.20 $23.09 $24.04 $25.00 $26.02 Average Nonsignatory Rental Rate - 125% (per square foot) $27.75 $28.86 $30.05 $31.25 $32.52 Landing Fee Average Landing Fee $2.18 $2.25 $2.32 $2.39 $2.47 International Landing Fee $2.28 $2.35 $2.42 $2.50 $2.58 Commuter / Rota / Tinian Landing Fee $1.71 $1.76 $1.82 $1.88 $1.93 Nonsignatory Landing Fee (125%) $2.73 $2.81 $2.90 $2.99 $3.09 Per Use Fee Per Use Fee - Ticket Counters and Queuing $52.99 $55.10 $57.38 $59.67 $62.09 Per Use Fee - Holdrooms/Gates $185.80 $193.22 $201.19 $209.23 $217.72 Debt Service Coverage 1.92 1.84 1.81 1.79 1.75 Cost Per Enplanement $12.59 $12.95 $13.35 $13.74 $14.14 Source: Commonwealth Ports Authority and Ricondo & Associates, Inc. Prepared by: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. PRELIMINARY DRAFT Page 3 of 28 PREPARED ON 11/04/2015 The remainder of this document is presented under the following headings: Financial Structure Activity Projections Terminal Space Debt Service PFC Revenue Operating Expenses Non-Aviation Revenues Airline Rates and Charges 1.2 Financial Structure Expenses, Debt Service and Capital Expenditures of the Authority are categorized into Cost Centers. The Authority utilizes the cost center structure described below, which is consistent with industry standards. The Authority has identified the following Direct Cost Centers: Airfield. The Airfield cost center includes the portion of the Airports provided for the landing, taking off, and taxiing of aircraft, including runways, taxiways, approach and runway protection zones, safety areas, infield areas, landing and navigational aids, and land areas required by or related to aeronautical use of the Airports. Main Terminal. The Main Terminal cost center includes the Saipan International Airport main terminal passenger building and associated curbside entrance areas and adjoining landscaped areas. This cost center also includes the aircraft aprons at the Main Terminal. Commuter Terminal. The Commuter Terminal cost center includes the Commuter Terminal building and associated curbside entrance areas, and aircraft aprons at the Commuter Terminal. Rota Terminal. The Rota Terminal cost center includes the Rota Terminal building, associated curbside entrance areas, and aircraft aprons at the Rota Terminal. Tinian Terminal. The Tinian Terminal cost center includes the Tinian Terminal building, associated curbside entrance areas, and aircraft aprons at the Tinian Terminal. Indirect Cost Centers have expenditures that will be allocated to Direct Cost Centers: ARFF. The ARFF cost center includes all aircraft rescue and firefighting functions of the Airport System. Security. The Security cost center includes all functions of the Airport System related to security. Administrative. The Administrative cost center includes the administrative functions of the Airport System. PRELIMINARY DRAFT Page 4 of 28 PREPARED ON 11/04/2015 For 2016, Operating Expenses in indirect cost centers will be allocated on the following basis. Allocation of Indirect Operating Expenditures Budget PROJECTED FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Allocation % for Saipan ARFF Operating Expenses: Main Terminal 39% 39% 39% 39% 39% Commuter Terminal 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Airfield 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Allocation % for Saipan Security Operating Expenses: Main Terminal 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% Commuter Terminal 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Airfield 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Allocation % for Saipan Administrative Operating Expenses: 1/ Main Terminal 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% Commuter Terminal 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Airfield 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1/ The Administrative Cost Center is allocated to Direct Cost Centers based on each Direct Cost Center's proportionate share of expenses after allocation of ARFF and Security indirect operating expenses. Source: Commonwealth Ports Authority Prepared by: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. ARFF and Security Cost Centers are allocated at each airport based on an approximation of effort expended in each Direct Cost Center and are consistent with industry standards. It is the intent of the Authority to review these allocations periodically throughout the term of the Agreement to ensure that expenses are properly allocated to the appropriate Direct Cost Centers. The Administrative Cost Center is allocated to Direct Cost Centers based on each Direct Cost Center’s proportionate share of expenses after allocation of ARFF and security indirect operating expenses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Study North Field Historic District
    Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 1 of 26 SPECIAL STUDY NORTH FIELD HISTORIC DISTRICT Tinian Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands September 2001 United States Department of the Interior - National Park Service http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 2 of 26 http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 3 of 26 North Field as it looked during World War II. The photo shows only three runways, which dates it sometime earlier than May 1945 when construction of Runway Four was completed. North Field was designed for an entire wing of B-29 Superfortresses, the 313th Bombardment Wing, with hardstands to park 265 B-29s. Each of the parallel runways stretched more than a mile and a half in length. Around and between the runways were nearly eleven miles of taxiways. Table of Contents SUMMARY BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA Location, Size and Ownership Regional Context RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE Current Status of the Study Area Cultural Resources Natural Resources Evaluation of Significance EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY AND FEASIBILITY Rarity of This Type of Resource (Suitability) Feasibility for Protection Position of CNMI and Local Government Officials http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 4 of 26 Plans and Objectives of the Lease Holder FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Findings and Conclusions Recommendations APPENDIX Selected References CINCPACFLT Letter of July 26, 2000 COMNAVMAR Letter of August 28, 2001 Brochure: Self-Guided Tour of North Field Tinian Interpret Marianas Campaign from American Memorial Park, on Tinian, and with NPS Publications MAPS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 40: Commonwealth Ports Authority
    TITLE 40: COMMONWEALTH PORTS AUTHORITY CHAPTER 40-10 AIRPORT DIVISION Subchapters 40-10.1 Airport Rules and Regulations 40-10.2 Military Exercise Ground Operations and Implementation Plans SUBCHAPTER 40-10.1 AIRPORT RULES AND REGULATIONS Part 001 General Provisions § 40-10.1-245 Permit Required for § 40-10.1-001 Authority Vehicle Rental Service § 40-10.1-005 Purpose § 40-10.1-250 Group Transportation § 40-10.1-010 Definitions Permits § 40-10.1-255 Implementing Rules Part 100 General Operational Rules and Regulations Part 300 General Operation on § 40-10.1-101 General Rules Public Aircraft Area § 40-10.1-105 Compliance with Rules § 40-10.1-301 Identification and Regulations § 40-10.1-305 Enplaning or Deplaning § 40-10.1-110 Commercial Activity Passengers § 40-10.1-115 Sightseeing § 40-10.1-310 Safety of Aircraft § 40-10.1-120 Parking and Storage of Operation Aircraft § 40-10.1-315 Deviation from Rules § 40-10.1-125 Storage of Cargo, Etc. § 40-10.1-130 Use of Operational Areas Part 400 Taxiing Rules § 40-10.1-135 Payment of Charges § 40-10.1-401 Taxiing and Ground § 40-10.1-140 Commercial Photography Rules Part 200 Operation of Vehicles Part 500 Traffic Pattern, § 40-10.1-201 Required Licenses Landing and Takeoff § 40-10.1-205 Obeying Signals and § 40-10.1-501 Left-hand Traffic Orders § 40-10.1-505 Ceiling Limitations § 40-10.1-210 Speed Limits § 40-10.1-510 General Traffic Rules § 40-10.1-215 Vehicles Within § 40-10.1-515 Helicopter Operations Operational Areas Rules § 40-10.1-220 Responsibility in Cases of Accidents Part 600 Rules for
    [Show full text]
  • SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY of STATISTICS Fiscal Year 1999
    SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF STATISTICS Fiscal Year 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Enplaned Deplaned Aircraft Enplaned Deplaned Landing Enplaned Passenger Passenger Landings Cargo Cargo Weight Mail - - - - - - - October 38,589 30,785 1,922 2,083,444 1,855,666 100,366,700 160,414 November 45,003 35,443 2,211 1,464,145 1,640,318 99,614,800 50,538 December 45,788 36,817 1,987 1,979,844 1,336,592 102,749,800 38,943 January 49,411 42,398 2,038 1,334,765 1,569,360 94,127,500 45,932 February 46,039 39,933 1,753 1,835,251 1,604,869 87,418,400 32,742 March 48,005 42,080 1,960 2,430,061 1,640,006 96,453,200 39,991 April 43,894 38,082 2,008 1,738,288 1,616,352 83,210,600 39,826 May 47,350 40,002 2,192 1,841,184 1,782,077 88,721,200 55,285 June 46,907 39,345 1,981 2,089,414 1,390,001 82,422,400 59,578 July 49,770 44,491 2,011 1,614,342 2,373,849 86,706,200 35,344 August 53,010 46,875 1,350 1,732,266 1,952,391 87,361,400 43,183 September 48,598 44,202 2,440 2,365,723 1,525,794 84,669,400 33,506 - - - - - - - Year-to- Date 562,364 480,453 23,853 22,508,727 20,287,275 1,093,821,600 635,282 1,138,319,554 - - - - - - - pounds pounds pounds pounds 2250872.7 2,250,873 2,028,728 average monthly SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Monthly Enplaned Pax by Airlines Fiscal Year 1999 Cont'l.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Introduction
    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Volumes 2 through 6 of this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) presented project-specific impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the proposed actions and alternatives. In contrast to the previous volumes, Volume 7 (this volume) addresses the impacts of all components of the preferred alternatives, in total, for both Guam and Tinian. The purpose of this volume is to list best management practices (BMPs) and proposed mitigation measures identified throughout the EIS (Chapter 2), present the combined impacts of the preferred alternatives (Chapter 3), and present the cumulative impacts of the preferred alternatives in combination with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions (Chapter 4). The information provided in Volume 7 is organized into four chapters: • Chapter 1, Introduction, summarizes the preferred alternatives described in previous volumes for Guam and Tinian. An overview of key natural events and human actions that have influenced the resources on both islands since World War II (WWII) is presented to provide an historical context for the current environmental setting of each island. • Chapter 2, Overview of Best Management Practices and Proposed Mitigation Measures, summarizes the mitigation and BMPs that were identified in previous volumes of this EIS. Mitigation measures are measures that are proposed to avoid, minimize, rectify, reduce/eliminate, or provide compensation for an impact resulting from implementation of an alternative. Chapter 2 also presents a discussion of force flow reduction and adaptive program management techniques that could be used to further mitigate construction and operations impacts, and minimize impacts to public infrastructure and resources due to increased population.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement / Overseas Environmental Impact Statement GUAM AND CNMI MILITARY RELOCATION Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts November 2009 Comments may be submitted to: Joint Guam Program Office c/o Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific Attn: Guam Program Management Office 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1 Geographic Boundary................................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2 Guam Preferred Alternatives ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Tinian Preferred Alternative ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 NO ACTION ............................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Concession Program and Optional Leasing Strategies
    Analysis of the Concession Program and Optional Leasing Strategies PREPARED FOR: Commonwealth Ports Authority Board of Directors PREPARED BY: RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC. September 16, 2014 Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (R&A) prepared this document for the stated purposes as expressly set forth herein and for the sole use of Commonwealth Ports Authority and its intended recipients. The techniques and methodologies used in preparing this document are consistent with industry practices at the time of preparation. COMMONWEALTH PORTS AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Facilities Assessment .................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.1 SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 ROTA AND TINIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS ............................................................................................. 3 2.2 Financial Performance................................................................................................................ 5 3. Legal and Contractual Framework ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pagan Airstrip Master Plan Pagan, Northern Islands
    – Pagan Airstrip Master Plan Pagan, Northern Islands AIP NO. 3-69-0004-01 FINAL REPORT September 2008 Prepared for: Commonwealth Ports Authority ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS CORPORATION PAGAN AIRSTRIP MASTER PLAN Pagan, Northern Islands, CNMI PAGAN AIRSTRIP MASTER PLAN Pagan, The Northern Islands Municipality, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands The preparation of this report was performed following the FAA Advisory Circular, Airport Master Plans, AC 150/5070-6B as a guideline. The objective of the study is to provide documentation that may assist the Commonwealth Ports Authority in the further development of the Pagan airstrip and to provide an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) in accordance with the latest FAA Western Pacific Regional ALP checklist. The contents of this report reflect the views of EFC Engineers & Architects Corporation, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the FAA or CPA. Prepared for: Commonwealth Ports Authority P.O. Box 501055 Saipan, MP 96950 Prepared by: EFC Engineers & Architects Corp. Bank of Hawaii Building Suite 301 Marina Heights Business Park P.O. Box 502415 Saipan, MP 96950 August 2008 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS Corporation PAGAN AIRSTRIP MASTER PLAN Pagan, Northern Islands, CNMI FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General 1.2 Purpose and Scope 1.3 Information Exchange Meetings 1.4 Field Survey of the Pagan Airstrip 1.5 Federal Guidelines 1.6 Civil-Military Innovative
    [Show full text]
  • SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Siaytd.95 YEAR-TO-DATE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Fiscal Year 1995
    SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT siaytd.95 YEAR-TO-DATE ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Fiscal Year 1995 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Enplaned Deplaned Aircraft Enplaned Deplaned Landing Enplaned Paasenger Passenger Landing Cargo Cargo Weight Mail - - - - - - - October 48,013 37,100 1,846 2,602,834 1,000,774 182,885,000 32,793 November 54,294 41,283 2,096 1,945,994 912,109 192,024,050 38,067 December 52,547 43,319 2,394 1,424,451 1,169,519 209,663,750 45,269 January 60,274 42,939 2,373 1,893,931 905,134 222,417,550 38,792 February 58,073 43,588 2,094 1,622,989 844,494 191,024,950 31,029 March 59,863 46,850 2,193 1,675,139 991,060 218,105,092 36,600 April 53,194 38,432 2,191 1,423,577 946,707 194,859,000 35,402 May 61,545 49,444 2,610 1,665,588 979,529 295,952,100 36,295 June 60,221 43,690 2,429 1,681,959 920,453 200,594,400 50,067 July 63,485 49,872 3,153 2,059,346 981,792 217,474,200 54,633 August 68,916 67,097 3,360 1,616,769 751,355 220,878,800 14,413 September 59,856 47,201 2,700 2,027,603 997,132 208,104,600 33,496 - - - - - - - Year-to- Date 700,281 550,815 29,439 21,640,180 11,400,058 2,553,983,492 446,856 - - - - - - - pounds pounds pounds pounds SAIPAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Monthly Enplaned Pax by Airlines Fiscal Year 1995 Cont'l.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement / Overseas Environmental Impact Statement GUAM AND CNMI MILITARY RELOCATION Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts November 2009 Comments may be submitted to: Joint Guam Program Office c/o Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific Attn: Guam Program Management Office 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1 Geographic Boundary................................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2 Guam Preferred Alternatives ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Tinian Preferred Alternative ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 NO ACTION ............................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • November 2011
    PAMELA FLYNN Visitors with Military Historical Tours (above) walk the same beaches at Tinian in July 2011 where the 4thMarDiv (right) came ashore on July 24, 1944, navigating through submerged mines and initially intense, but overall light resistance. (USMC photo at right) Because Marines Never Forget Part II, Tinian By R. R. Keene up to six passengers. One of the pilots, a don’t have far to drive. The Dynasty Hotel young woman with her hair pulled back to & Casino stands out like a huge scar in here are clues about Tinian’s small- keep it from blowing in the cockpit, wears the island’s lush hues of greenery. The town atmosphere. Signs outside the big sunglasses and tells Rick Spooner’s Dynasty opened in 1998 with more than domestic airlines of Saipan Inter- son to hold the door open. The single prop 400 rooms, marble floors, mammoth chan- Tnation al Airport read: “No chewing or spins, the plane rolls, it lifts off, and she deliers and an opulence that seems out spitting betel nut,” another name for the tells the younger Spooner to close the of place in Tinian. But the owners of the seed of the areca palm that grows well in door, reaches across him and locks it. gas stations and Dynasty Hotel & Casino the Marianas. It is a mild stimulant, ap- Seven minutes later the plane touches and more than 3,000 residents are betting parently habit-forming, banned in schools, down on Tinian’s West Field now grandly Tinian has a future, perhaps with a little and it stains sidewalks and teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • CNMI Comprehensive Public Land Use Plan Update for Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and the Northern Islands
    CNMI Comprehensive Public Land Use Plan Update for Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and the Northern Islands Department of Public Lands Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ IV II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ V III. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 7 1. ENABLING LEGISLATION ....................................................................................................... 7 2. 1989 PUBLIC LAND USE PLAN ............................................................................................... 7 3. DOCUMENT SUMMARY AND ORGANIZATION ......................................................................... 8 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ........................................................................................................ 8 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 9 1. CNMI HISTORICAL/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ............................................................ 9 2. Population ................................................................................................................................. 12 3. Location and Density of Land Uses for CNMI .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Air to Stop Serving Tinian Route
    I, j j , j ;ii ( I I 1 I I 'lJ I" J ta maid cries rape i By Ferdie de la Torre the rape case at DPS Wednesday nent" clan in Rota, is a govern­ Variety gathered that the beau­ ended up as a domestic helper. at2:01 p.m. ment employee working at the tiful woman was a former recep­ Sources howeversaid the com­ A PRETIY Filipina housemaid Sheu said the victim claimed island's health center. tionist at Manila Hotel, a famous plainant who had just arrived on surfaced the other day at the De­ she was sexually assaulted by her The housemaid was allegedly five-star hotel in Manila, Philip­ the island last month, usedto work partment of Public Safety in male employer in separate occa­ abused several times at the pines. in a Rota club before where she Saipan, complaining she was sions. suspect's ranch, said sources who It was not cleared yet why she Continued on Daae 20 raped recent!yby her employer in The DPS information officer requested anonymity. the island of Rota. said no arrest was made yet. The The same sources said the vic­ In yesterday's press briefing, case is being investigated by the tim failed to immediately report Department of Public Safety In­ Criminal Investigation Section. the incident to authorities for fear Labor pact signed formationOfficerCathy Sheu said Sources revealed that the sus­ of her employer. She has also no the 24-year-old housemaid filed pect, who belongs to a "prorni- fare money to Saipan. between R~ NMI Liaison office opens in Manila I Tenorio tells House: IN A JOINT effort aimed at making abuse of Philippine contract j workers in the CNMI history, representatives of the CNMI and I Philippine governments Wednesday signed an agrt?ement to, Stick to lawmaking "promoteand strengthenareas ofcooperation in the field oflabor, employment and manpower development." By Rafael H.
    [Show full text]