Upper Illinois River Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper Illinois River Basin science for a changing world NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Upper Illinois River Basin WHAT is THE NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT MAJOR WATER-QUALITY ISSUES PROGRAM? IN THE UPPER ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN During the past 25 years, industry and government made large financial investments that resulted in better water quality across the Nation; however, many water-quality The Upper Illinois River Basin National Water- concerns remain. Following a 1986 pilot project, the U.S. Geological Survey began imple­ Quality Assessment (NAWQA) study will increase mentation of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program in 1991. This the scientific understanding of surface- and program differs from other national water-quality assessment studies in that the NAWQA ground-water quality and the factors that affect integrates monitoring of surface- and ground-water quality with the study of aquatic water quality in the basin. The study also will ecosystems. The goals of the NAWQA Program are to (1) describe current water-quality provide information needed by water-resource conditions for a large part of the Nation's freshwater streams and aquifers (water-bearing managers to implement effective water-quality sediments and rocks), (2) describe how water quality is changing over time, and management actions and evaluate long-term (3) improve our understanding of the primary natural and human factors affecting water changes in water quality. quality. Chicago is the largest city in the upper Illinois River Basin. Construction in developing EXPLANATION suburbs may I I National Water-Quality affect biodiver­ Assessment Study Unit sity, habitat, and Upper Illinois River Basin Study Unit water quality. Assessing the quality of water in every location of the Nation would not be practical; therefore, NAWQA Program studies are conducted within areas called study units. These study units comprise 59 important river and aquifer systems that represent the diverse geog­ raphy, water resources, and land and water uses of the Nation. The upper Illinois River Basin is one such study unit designed to include (1) many important river systems; Over the past half century, water-quality (2) unconsolidated and bedrock aquifer systems; and (3) a mixture of agricultural, urban, improvements in the basin were numerous because industrial, and rapidly urbanizing areas. Study activities in the upper Illinois River Basin of advances in municipal and industrial waste began in 1997. treatment. The effects of industrialization and urbanization on the quality of rivers and ground- Protection Plan, and Conservation 2000. The following is a list of some major water- water resources, however, remain a primary quality issues that currently face water-resource managers in the upper Illinois River concern to water-resource managers; planners; Basin: Federal. State and local governments; and citizen Atmospheric deposition of pesticides Recovery of water levels in bedrock groups. Many of these issues relate to point and and trace metals and its effect on aquifers and its potential effect on water nonpoint pollution sources and are the subject of aquatic biota; quality; ongoing research and management programs. Examples of these programs include State and Endocrine disrupting compounds in Surface-water sampling strategies for Federally funded projects like the Tunnel And Res­ surface and ground water; computing total maximum daily loads; ervoir Project in the Chicago metropolitan area and Effectiveness of Federal pollution- Occurrence, transport, and fate of program-related initiatives, such as Total Maxi­ control projects on water quality; pesticides, trace elements, and volatile mum Daily Loads, Best Management Practices, Restoration of the Grand Kankakee organic compounds in surface and ground and Wetland Restoration; and State and local Marsh and its effect on hydrology and water; programs, such as Ambient Water-Quality water quality; Effects of urbanization on biodiversity, Monitoring, Illinois Wellhead Protection, Side Nutrient enrichment of surface and habitat, and water quality. Stream Elevated Pool Aeration. Pesticide Manage­ ground waters; ment and Monitoring, Wisconsin Watershed U.S. Department of the Interior USGS Fact Sheet FS-072-98 U.S. Geological Survey June 1998 STUDY UNIT DESCRIPTION Although land use in the Des Plaines and Fox the unsaturated zone. In the saturated zone, water River Subbasins are best characterized as mixed and dissolved compounds flow horizontally, verti­ Physiography and Climate. The upper urban-agricultural, land use in the Kankakee cally upward discharging to streams and irrigation Illinois River Basin lies within the Central River Subbasin is predominantly agricultural systems (ditches and/or tiles) and/or vertically Lowland Provinfce and includes the Great Lakes (table 1). About 91 percent of the Kankakee River downward recharging the Silurian-Devonian bed­ and the Till Plajns sections. Landforms in these Subbasin is devoted to growing corn and soy­ rock. Ultimately, the total volume of stored physiographic sections are the result of glaciation beans. Large areas of crops are irrigated in the ground water depends on spatial and temporal and typically have less than 300 feet (ft) of relief. Indiana part of the Kankakee River Subbasin, variations in the evapotranspiration, pumpage, The Great Lakes section is further subdivided into where sandier soils, low relief, and suitable and streamflow, whereas the types of dissolved the Chicago Lake Plain and Wheaton Morainal ground-water resources are present. The largest compounds present depend on the land use. subsections, and the Till Plains section is further urban area in the Kankakee River Subbasin is subdivided into the Kankakee Plain and Bloom- Kankakee, Illinois. The population of Kankakee In areas where the Cambrian-Ordovician ington Ridged Plain subsections. and surrounding suburbs was about 96,255 in aquifer is confined by the Maquoketa shale, A large part of metropolitan Chicago is within 1990. urbanization and/or agricultural production prob­ the Chicago Lake Plain subsection. Surface ably does not directly affect water quality; how­ drainage in this area is toward the middle third of Table 1. Land use in the upper Illinois ever, the total withdrawals from wells in the the Des Plaines River and the Chicago Sanitary River Basin in 1990 Chicago area have raised concern because these and Ship Canal. Surface drainage in the Wheaton Subbasin (percent) withdrawals may be greater than the natural Morainal subsection is toward the Kankakee, recharge to the aquifer. As many public water sup­ Land use Des Fox Illinois Kankakee Des Plaines, and Fox Rivers. In the Kankakee Plaines pliers in the Chicago area convened from ground subsection, surface drainage is toward the Urban 58.7 15.7 3.5 3.1 water to Lake Michigan water, water Kankakee, Iroquois, and Mazon Rivers, whereas Agricultural 33.2 70.9 88.8 90.9 Forest 5. 7. 4.6 4.4 levels in this aquifer recovered as much as 260 ft. drainage in the Bloomington Ridged Plain Wetland .7 2.1 .4 .8 More recently, the increased demand for water subsection is toward the lower Fox River and the Water 1. 2.4 1. .5 because of continued suburbanization, coupled Barren 1.5 1.8 1.8 .3 upper Iroquois Rivers. with Federal restrictions on providing additional The climate of the upper Illinois River Basin Lake Michigan water, has caused local water- Surface Water. Approximately 91 percent is classified as humid continental. In general, resource managers to develop new supplies in the (9,964 mi2) of the upper Illinois River Basin summers are hot and humid, and the winters are surficial sand and gravel deposits and/or reacti­ cold with an average annual temperature of 9°C. (10,949 mi2) is drained by three principal rivers: the Kankakee, the Des Plaines, and the Fox. The vate available wells open to the bedrock aquifer The average annual precipitation for 1951-80 for supplemental or peak water supply. ranged from 32 inches (in.) in the north at the Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers join near Morris. Illinois, to form the Illinois River. The headwaters of the Des Plaines and Fox Rivers Surface-Water/Ground-Water Fox River discharges to the Illinois River at the to 40 in. in the east at the headwaters of the Interaction. In many places, surface water and southwestern basin boundary at Ottawa, Illinois. Kankakee River. ground water are hydraulically connected; that is, The largest part of the basin (5,165 mi2, or streams, wetlands, and lakes receive water and Population and Land Use. About 47.2 percent) is drained by the Kankakee River. dissolved compounds from (discharge), or 6 million people, or 86 percent of the 7.6 million The Des Plaines River drains 2,111 mi2 and provide to (recharge), the subsurface. In some people in the upper Illinois River Basin, live in includes 673 mi2 that originally drained to Lake urban streams, the apparent ground-water urban areas. The Northeastern Illinois Planning Michigan through the Chicago and Calumet discharge is actually water from Lake Michigan Commission estimates that the Chicago popula­ Rivers. The Illinois River, lower Des Plaines tion (about 3 million) grew by 4 percent from River, and two canal systems in the Chicago diversions and/or wastewater treatment returns; in 1970 to 1990, whereas the amount of urban land metropolitan area provide a navigable link this case, water recharges the subsurface. In other expanded by 51 percent more than 563 square between Lake Michigan and the Mississippi flat-lying areas composed of sand and gravel, miles (mi2). At present, the most rapid Chicago River. ground water discharges to the surface over broad areas creating biogeochemically important wet­ metropolitan expansion is west and northwest Ground Water. In the upper Illinois River toward the Fox River. Basin, aquifers are associated with the Quater­ lands. In many cases, the ground-water discharge to these wetlands, such as the former 500,000 Land use in the upper Illinois River Basin is nary, Silurian-Devonian, and Cambrian-Ordovi- typical of large agricultural and urban areas in the cian systems.
Recommended publications
  • Kankakee Watershed
    Van Kankakee 8 Digit Watershed (07120001) Buren Total Acres: 1,937,043 Kankakee Watershed - 12 Digit HUCs Illinois Acres: 561,041 Indiana Acres: 1,371,490 Michigan Acres: 4,512 LAKE MICHIGAN Indiana Counties Acres s n i a Elkhart County: 7,287 o g Kane i n Fulton County: 1 i l h Berrien l c Cass Jasper County: 103,436 I i Kosciusko County: 32,683 M Lake County: D15u1P,6a3g8e LaPorte County: 298,166 Marshall County: 207,453 Newton County: 79,365 Porter County: 141,795 Pulaski County: 8,658 St. Joseph County: 175,401 Indiana 0201 Starke County: 165,607 Cook LaPorte 0202 Grey shaded 12-digit watersheds fall completely or 0207 0 2 0203 partially within Indiana. Shaded 12-digit watershed 0 St. 0403 4 0205 names and acres are on page 2. Joseph Elkhart 0208 0 0206 4-digit labels represent the last 4 numbers of the 4 0209 0406 02 12-digit watershed code. 0 0104 0 4 3 *Please note, all acres are approximate.* 1003 01 0 0302 0 0105 5 Winter 2013 1 0 10 0 0 4 6 0301 02 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0304 0 8 7 0102 Porter 0 1 0405 1 0 Will 1004 0 1 0303 8 0 1807 0 3 0101 Lake 4 8 0702 1308 0 0309 4 1007 8 0803 8 0 0 1 0 18 0703 11 1702 0 0 3 0307 1 0 0312 3 1 1 3 0 0 0701 2 1 0 1809 0 5 1306 1302 9 0308 1 0 2 5 0 5 4 1309 6 0704 0306 1 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0310 y 0502 8 0 1703 7 3 0 0 5 0705 0504 1010 0 d 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 n 3 1 0506 1 1 0 u 1 3 0 0603 0505 r 0 1 4 1305 8 1806 1502 8 1 30 0 G 1 6 0503 Marshall 1 0 1311 4 1 Kosciusko 1 0904 0501 1504 1 3 0604 0602 4 1 1604 3 0807 0 3 2 1307 1 4 1 0 0 Starke 8 2 8 0 3 9 0 4 1 0 1204 1101 0 9 1805 9 0601 1602 0 1803 1205
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Snowmobile Trails
    Connects To Wisconsin Trails East g g Dubuque g Warren L E G E N D 26 Richmond 173 78 Durand E State Grant Assisted Snowmobile Trails N Harvard O Galena O on private lands, open to the public. For B ILLINOIS’ SELF-FUNDED 75 E K detailed information on these trails, contact: A 173 L n 20 Capron n Illinois Association of Snowmobile Clubs, Inc. n P.O. Box 265 • Marseilles, IL 61341-0265 N O O P G e A McHenry Gurnee S c er B (815) 795-2021 • Fax (815) 795-6507 TRAIL SYSTEM Stockton N at iv E E onica R N H N Y e-mail: [email protected] P I R i i E W Woodstock N i T E S H website: www.ilsnowmobile.com C Freeport 20 M S S The State of Illinois has adopted, by legislative E Rockford Illinois Department of Natural Resources I 84 l V l A l D r Snowmobile Trails open to the public. e Belvidere JO v action, a system of funding whereby snowmobilers i R 90 k i i c Algonquin i themselves pay for the network of trails that criss-cross Ro 72 the northern 1/3 of the state. Monies are generated by Savanna Forreston Genoa 72 Illinois Department of Natural Resources 72 Snowmobile Trail Sites. See other side for detailed L L information on these trails. An advance call to the site 64 O Monroe snowmobile registration fees. These funds are administered by R 26 R E A L is recommended for trail conditions and suitability for C G O Center Elgin b b the Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the snowmobile use.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Rivers, Five Glaciers, and an Outburst Flood: the Considerable Legacy of the Illinois River
    SIX RIVERS, FIVE GLACIERS, AND AN OUTBURST FLOOD: THE CONSIDERABLE LEGACY OF THE ILLINOIS RIVER Don McKay, Chief Scientist, Illinois State Geological Survey 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 [email protected] INTRODUCTION The waters of the modern Illinois River flow gently through looping meanders bordered by quiet backwater lakes and drop only a few inches in each river mile. Concealed beneath this gentle river is geologic evidence that the Illinois descended from ancient rivers with surprising and sometimes violent histories. The geologic story of the Illinois River is not only an account of an interesting chapter of Earth history, but it also reveals a rich geologic legacy of valuable and vulnerable resources that should be managed and used wisely. Modern, detailed, geologic field mapping has enabled new insights into the river’s history. Begun in 2000 by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS), geologic mapping in the Middle Illinois River Valley area (Fig 1) was undertaken to aid planning for an expansion of Illinois Highway 29 between Chillicothe and I-180 west of Hennepin. Mapping was focused initially on the western bluff and valley bottom west of the river near the present highway but has since been expanded to more than 275 sq mi in Putnam, Marshall, and Peoria counties. Funding was provided by Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and by ISGS. Several maps are scheduled to be published (McKay and others 2008a, 2008b, 2008c). Figure 1. Location of recent and ongoing geologic mapping area in the Middle Illinois River Valley region of north-central Illinois (left) and northeastern portion of the Chillicothe 7.5-minute surficial geology map (right) showing areas of river deposits, glacial tills, and bedrock where they occur at land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Cities of Marseilles, Ottawa, and Peru, Lasalle County, Illinois Village of Depue, Bureau County, Illinois January 2018
    Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Cities of Marseilles, Ottawa, and Peru, LaSalle County, Illinois Village of DePue, Bureau County, Illinois January 2018 Prepared by Booz Allen Hamilton 8283 Greensboro Drive McLean, VA 22102 Prepared for FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 Photo attributes: Top left: City of Ottawa Top right: City of Peru Bottom left: City of Marseilles Bottom right: Village of DePue Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Page ii January 2018 Programmatic Environmental Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations List of Acronyms and Abbreviations oC Degrees Celsius ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AD Anno Domini AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act APE Area of Potential Effect ARPA Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 BFE Base Flood Elevation BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP Best Management Practice BP Before Present CAA Clean Air Act CEQ Council on Environmental Quality C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations CLOMR Conditional Letter of Map Revision CRS Community Rating System CWA Clean Water Act CWS Community Water Supplies dB decibels EA Environmental Assessment EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Page iii January 2018 Programmatic Environmental Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FPPA Farmland Protection Policy
    [Show full text]
  • North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan
    North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan By: Tetra Tech 1468 West 9th Street, Suite 620 Cleveland, OH 44113 In support of: EPA Contract Number EP-C-11-009 Work Assignment 1-29 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 December 2012 North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan Page ii Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 TMDL/LRS Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Watershed Plan Requirements - Nine Key Elements................................................................. 6 1.3 Implementation Plan Approach ................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1 Nonstructural Management Opportunities ....................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Structural Management Opportunities ............................................................................. 8 2. Implementation Partners and Existing Implementation Efforts ............................................ 10 2.1 Implementation Partners ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Existing Implementation Efforts ............................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Honoring our Water Stormwater Plan ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources and Use in Lake County
    ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ " ¸ S # Whiting # ¸ ¸ # # " ¸ S S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # East ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ Chicago # ¸ ¸ # S" # Ogden Burns Harbor ¸ # Dunes ¸ # ¸ # S" ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ S" # ¸ # Porter Chesterton ¸ I-90 # S" ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¨¦§ I-94 S" # Gary ¨¦§ Hammond S" Lake S" Station Portage 80 ¸ # New I- ¸ S" Munster # S" I-80 § ¸ ¸ ¨¦ ¸ # # # ¸ ¨¦§ Chicago # " ¸ S ¸ # # Highland ¸ # ¸ S" S" # South ¸ # Haven ¸ # ¸ # Hobart ¸ " # Griffith S ¸ # S" ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # " # S ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # # ¸ Dyer # ¸ ¸ # S" Merrillville # ¸ Schererville # " S" Valparaiso S S" Saint John S" r e e ¸ t # ¸ k # r ¸ # a o ¸ Crown # L P ¸ # Point ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¨¦§ I - ¸ 6 # Cedar 5 Lake ¸ # ¸ Cedar S" # ¸ Lake # ¸ Hebron Kouts # S" S" ¸ Lowell # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ Por # t ¸ ¸ e # # r ¸ ¸ # ¸ # Jas # ¸ p # ¸ e # r ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # ke # ¸ # a ¸ ¸ ¸ L # # # ¸ # ¸ r # e sp ¸ a # J ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ DeMotte # Wheatfield ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ " # n S r ¸ # S" e o ¸ ¸ # # ¸ t # p s w ¸ ¸ # # a e ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # J N r ¸ Rive # ¸ Kankakee # ¨¦§I ¸ # - Lake 6 5 ewton N ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # Withdrawal
    [Show full text]
  • (11Gr100), a Historic Native American Short Duration Occupation on the Des Plaines River, Grundy County, Illinois
    The Highlands Site Craig and Vorreyer, 2004 Mundane Place or Sacred Space: Interpreting the Highlands Site (11Gr100), a Historic Native American Short Duration Occupation on the Des Plaines River, Grundy County, Illinois By Joseph Craig and Susan Vorreyer (Environmental Compliance Consultants, Inc.) Archaeological excavations conducted at the Highlands Site near Channahon, Illinois exposed a small, short-duration historic period Native American occupation situated on the upland bluff overlooking the Des Plaines River. Excavated features included four shallow basins, one hearth and a unique semi-circular shallow depression. Historic period artifacts were sparse and included glass seed beads, pieces of scrap copper and lead, and triangular projectile points. Rich amounts of subsistence remains including elk and bison were also recovered from several features. The Highlands site is interpreted as representing a Potawatomi occupation dating to the late 18 th or early 19 th century. Using historical accounts and illustrations of Potawatomi sites and religious customs and activities, the Highlands Site appears to represent a Potawatomi ritual location. Although graves or human skeletal material were not encountered, the analyses of the artifact assemblage, feature morphology and patterning, and interpretation of the faunal assemblage suggests the Highlands site was utilized as a mortuary location. The area surrounding the base of Lake Michigan at the point where the Kankakee and Des Plaines rivers merge with the upper reaches of the Illinois River was the penetration point of the Potawatomi migration into the western Great Lakes region known as the Illinois Country. Beginning in the mid-1600s, the Potawatomi, who inhabited the western Michigan, initiated a series of westward movements to acquire larger hunting territories buttressing their participation in the North American fur trade and also to avoid pressure (and competition) from Iroquois raiders and trappers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Shabbona History
    CHIEF SHABBONA HISTORY It was in 1775, one year before the American Revolution Shab-eh-nay was interested in the welfare of both Indians and settlers. The newcomers that an Indian boy was born near the banks of the taught him how to grow better crops and Shab-eh-nay shared his knowledge of nature – Kankakee River. A boy who would grow up to befriend the especially the medicinal powers of plants. new nation’s people. His Ottawa parents named him In 1827, the Winnebago planned an attack on the frontier village of Chicago; Shab-eh-nay “Shab-eh-nay” (Shabbona), which means “Built like a rode to Fort Chicago to warn the white men. In 1832, he made a heroic ride when Bear”. And true to his name, he grew up to be a muscular Blackhawk planned a raid to reclaim Indian land. The 54 year old Potawatomi Chief rode 200 lbs., standing 5’ 9” tall. 48 hours to warn settlers through unmapped forest and vast prairies to prevent Around 1800, Shab-eh-nay was part of an Ottawa hunting bloodshed of both settlers and Indians. party that wandered into a Potawatomi camp near the In gratitude for his peacemaking efforts, the United States, in Article III of the 1829 Treaty southern shore of Lake Michigan. All of the Ottawa of Prairie du Chien, reserved 1,280 acres of land for Chief Shab-eh-nay and his Band. returned to their own village, except Shab-eh-nay, who These lands were historically occupied by the Potawatomi in what is now DeKalb County, stayed through the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the Decline of a NATIVE SPECIES by Paige A
    The history of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the decline of a NATIVE SPECIES BY PAIGE A. METTLER-CHERRY AND MARIAN SMITH 34 | The Confluence | Fall 2009 A very important advantage, and one which some, perhaps, will find it hard to credit, is that we could easily go to Florida in boats, and by a very good navigation. There would be but one canal to make … Louis Joliet, 1674, making the earliest known proposal to alter the Illinois River (Hurlbut 1881) Emiquon National Wildlife Refuge as it appears today. The corn and soybean fields (see page 38) have been replaced by the reappearance of Thompson and Flag lakes. The refuge already teems with wildlife, including many species of migrating waterfowl, wading birds, deer, and re-introduced native fish species. (Photo: Courtesy of the author) Fall 2009 | The Confluence | 35 Large river ecosystems are perhaps the most modified systems in The lower Illinois Valley is much older than the upper and has the world, with nearly all of the world’s 79 large river ecosystems been glaciated several times. The Illinoisan ice sheet covered much altered by human activities (Sparks 1995). In North America, of Illinois, stopping 19.9 miles north of the Ohio River. The effects the Illinois River floodplain has been extensively modified and of the glacier are easily seen when comparing the flat agricultural the flood pulse, or annual flood regime, of the river is distorted fields of central and northern Illinois, which the glacier covered, as a result of human activity (Sparks, Nelson, and Yin 1998). to the Shawnee Hills of southern Illinois, where the glacier did Although many view flooding as an unwanted destructive force of not reach.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Americanwaterfowl M Anagement P Lan the North
    PROJECT.HTML 219.980.5455 (h) room for room WWW.EARTH-SEA.COM/ 219.945.0543 (w) 13 219.924.4403—ext. (w) always or visit or Project Manager Project Chairman BOB NICKOVICH, BOB BLYTHE, DICK There is There For further information please contact: please information further For There is always room for more, and there is much left to do. We welcome your inquiries into participation as a partner. a as participation into inquiries your welcome We do. to left much is there and more, for room always is There courtesy of USDA NRCS. USDA of courtesy Several pictures in this publication this in pictures Several Lake Heritage Parks Foundation Parks Heritage Lake Lake County Parks Dept. Parks County Lake WYIN-TV Lake County Fish and Game and Fish County Lake Wille & Stiener Real Estate Real Stiener & Wille Kankakee River Basin Commission Basin River Kankakee Waterfowl USA Waterfowl J.F. New & Associates & New J.F. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and Fish U.S. Indiana Heritage Trust Fund Trust Heritage Indiana Service Indiana Department of Natural Resources Natural of Department Indiana USDA Natural Resources Conservation Resources Natural USDA Inc. University of Notre Dame Notre of University Griffith Izaak Walton Conservation Lands, Conservation Walton Izaak Griffith Town of Demotte of Town GMC Dealers of NW Indiana NW of Dealers GMC The Nature Conservancy Nature The Enbridge Pipelines (Lakehead) LLC (Lakehead) Pipelines Enbridge Studer & Associates & Studer Dunes Calumet Audubon Society Audubon Calumet Dunes St. Joseph County Parks Department Parks County Joseph St. Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Unlimited, Ducks Ritschard Bros., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area, Illinois and Indiana
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 PREFACE This preliminary report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area of Illinois and Indiana was prepared by the Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of discharge in the area covered by this report were collected in cooperation with the Illinois De­ partment of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; the Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and the Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Re­ sources. The records of discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer, Champaign, 111.; and D. M. Corbett, district engineer, Indi­ anapolis, Ind. The data were computed and te^t prepared by the authors in the district offices in Illinois and Indiana. The report was assembled by the staff of the Technical Stand­ ards Section in Washington, D. C., Tate Dalrymple, chief. li CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................. 1 General description of floods............................ 1 Location.............................................. 1 Little Calumet River basin...........................
    [Show full text]
  • North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan
    CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1 What is a Watershed? ............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.1 Why A Watershed-Based Plan? ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning Area .......................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 Chicago River Watershed................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning Area .................................................. 1-5 1.2.2.1 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Partnerships ............................................................. 1-8 1.2.2.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning .................................................................... 1-8 1.3 WATERSHED PLAN PURPOSE .................................................................................................. 1-9 1.4 Watershed Plan Requirements, Process, and Organization ................................................. 1-10 1.5 Previous and Related Studies and Plans ............................................................................... 1-11 1.6 Use of the Plan .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]