Routine Isotopic Analysis of Iron by HR-MC-ICPMS: How Precise and How Accurate?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chemical Geology 267 (2009) 175–184 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemical Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemgeo Routine isotopic analysis of iron by HR-MC-ICPMS: How precise and how accurate? Nicolas Dauphas a,b,⁎, Ali Pourmand a,b, Fang-Zhen Teng a,b,1 a Origins Laboratory, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, the University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago IL 60637, USA b Enrico Fermi Institute, the University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago IL 60637, USA article info abstract Article history: High-temperature isotopic variations documented in natural materials span a narrow range and call for Received 14 June 2008 precise and accurate isotopic analyses. Precisions better than ~0.03‰ (95% confidence interval) for δ56Fe Received in revised form 16 November 2008 have been obtained by High-Resolution Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (HR- Accepted 5 December 2008 MC-ICPMS). Whether these uncertainties encompass all sources of error has not been carefully evaluated. The current study examines all parameters that can affect accuracy and precision of Fe isotopic Keywords: measurements by HR-MC-ICPMS. It is demonstrated that accurate δ56Fe measurements can be routinely Iron isotopes HR-MC-ICPMS achieved within the quoted uncertainties. Chromatography © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Precision Accuracy 1. Introduction have variable compositions averaging ~0‰ (Williams et al., 2005; Schoenberg and von Blanckenburg, 2006; Weyer and Ionov, 2007). The field of Fe isotope geochemistry has seen important develop- Although increasing the number of repeats (n)inHighResolution ments in methodology and scope since the advent of Multi-Collector (HR-) MC-ICPMS reduces the uncertainty relatedp toffiffiffi instability in Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (MC-ICPMS) (see recent instrumental mass bias and counting statistics (~1 = n), many other reviews by Anbar, 2004; Beard and Johnson, 2004; Johnson et al., 2004; parameters can affect the precision and accuracy of Fe isotopic analyses Dauphas and Rouxel, 2006). There is now increasing evidence that Fe (Malinovsky et al., 2003; Schoenberg and von Blanckenburg, 2005). isotopic variations are not confined to the realm of biology or low These include mass fractionation during column chromatography, temperature aqueous geochemistry but can also occur at high incomplete separation of Fe from matrix elements that can cause temperature by equilibrium fractionation between minerals and melts instrumental mass bias to vary, presence of direct isobars from 54Cr+ on (Polyakov and Mineev, 2000; Polyakov et al., 2007; Dauphas et al., 2007; 54Fe+ and 58Ni+ on 58Fe+ and imperfect matching in acid molarity or Fe Schuessler et al., 2007; Shahar et al., 2008), by diffusion in solid metal concentration between samples and bracketing standards. (Mullen, 1961; Roskosz et al., 2006; Dauphas, 2007 and references A major challenge in making precise and accurate measurements therein) and silicate melts (Richter et al., 2009), by evaporation/ of Fe isotopes arises from incomplete mass separation between Fe and condensation (Wang et al., 1994; Alexander and Hewins, 2004; Dauphas argides, which include interferences of 40Ar14N+, 40Ar16O+, and et al., 2004; Tachibana et al., 2007; Zipfel and Weyer, 2007), and by Soret 40Ar16O1H+ on 54Fe+, 56Fe+, and 57Fe+, respectively. Several strategies diffusion (Huang et al., in press; Richter et al., 2009). Considering that the have been employed to address this analytical difficulty and are briefly Fe isotopic compositions of most geomaterials formed at high tempera- discussed below. (i) The first method employed for isotopic analysis of ture span a narrow range, important unsettled questions require high Fe by MC-ICPMS relies on desolvating nebulization to increase the precision and accurate analyses. For instance, the Fe isotopic composition ratio of Fe/argide (Belshaw et al., 2000; Anbar et al., 2000; Zhu et al., of the silicate Earth is still uncertain. While basalts have almost 2002, de Jong et al., 2007). Nevertheless, this brute-force method is homogeneous δ56Fe around +0.1‰ (Beard et al., 2003; Schoenberg and incapable of eliminating all interferences and careful matching von Blanckenburg, 2006; Weyer and Ionov, 2007), mantle peridotites between standard and sample ion intensities during bracketing is essential. (ii) The GV IsoProble MC-ICPMS is equipped with a hexapole collision cell, which is primarily used to thermalize the incoming ions ⁎ Corresponding author. Origins Laboratory, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, before introduction into the magnetic sector. It also serves the purpose the University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago IL 60637, USA. of breaking down molecules such as argides through interaction with E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Dauphas). 1 Present address: Isotope Laboratory, Department of Geosciences and Arkansas the collision gas, a mixture of Ar and H2 for Fe isotopes (Beard et al., Center for Space and Planetary Sciences, University of Arkansas, 113 Ozark Hall, 2003; Rouxel et al., 2003; Dauphas et al., 2004). (iii) Operating the MC- Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. ICPMS at reduced power (cold plasma) can also drastically reduce 0009-2541/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.011 176 N. Dauphas et al. / Chemical Geology 267 (2009) 175–184 argide interferences (Kehm et al., 2003). The main drawback of this be a problem for certain matrices, such as sulfides. To mitigate this technique, however, is that it promotes formation of CaOH+, which problem, Schoenberg and von Blanckenburg (2005) introduced an iron 57 + can interfere with Fe peak. (iv) Medium to high mass-resolving hydroxide precipitation step by basification with NH4(OH). power on the Thermo Scientific Neptune, Nu-Plasma HR, and Nu Plasma 1700 are used to separate argide interferences from Fe isotopes 3. Mass spectrometry (Malinovsky et al., 2003; Weyer and Schwieters, 2003; Arnold et al., 2004; Poitrasson and Freydier, 2005; Schoenberg and von Blancken- Iron isotopic analyses were performed with a Thermo Scientific burg, 2005; Williams et al., 2005; Borrok et al., 2007). Precisions of Neptune HR-MC-ICPMS (see Wieser and Schwieters, 2005 for a better than 0.04‰ are achievable with this method. description of the instrument). The mass-resolution of the instrument In the current study, we evaluate the variables that can affect the is controlled with a set of three switchable slits (250 μm, 30 μm, and accuracy of Fe isotope measurements using HR-MC-ICPMS. Error bars 16 μm width) located before the electrostatic analyzer. Measurements in Fe isotope geochemistry have been traditionally ascribed based on were performed in both medium-resolution (MR) and high-resolution either the long-term external reproducibility of geostandards or the (HR) modes. In these two modes, the Fe+ peaks are resolved from argide dispersion of replicate analyses of a solution during a session of interferences as flat-topped shoulders on the low mass side of argide measurements. In the following, we present a method, which is also peaks (Weyer and Schwieters, 2003). The mass resolution is defined as applicable to other isotope systems, to take into account both sources m/(m0.95 −m0.05), where m0.95 and m0.05 are the masses measured at of analytical uncertainties. We demonstrate that δ56Fe can be 5% and 95% intensity peak heights (see Weyer and Schwieters, 2003, measured accurately at a precision of ~0.03‰ in rocks and minerals. for details). Mass resolutions are equal to ~8500 and ~11,000 for MR and HR, respectively. The ion transmission efficiency of the instru- 2. Chemical separation of iron ment for Fe is reduced by a factor of ~8 from LR to MR and another factor i i 54 of ~2 from MR to HR. The δ notation (in ‰), δ Fe=[( Fe/ Fe)sample / i 54 3 All chemical protocols used for Fe isotopic analyses rely on the ( Fe/ Fe)IRMM-014 −1]×10 , is used throughout the current study. partition behavior of Fe with anion-exchange resin in HCl medium IRMM-014 is a pure Fe metal reference material (Taylor et al., 1992)that (Strelow, 1980). Matrix and interfering elements are eluted with has a Fe isotopic composition identical to chondrites (Dauphas and concentrated HCl while Fe, which forms strong anion chloride- Rouxel, 2006). Unless otherwise noted, the pair of isotopes reported is complexes, is retained on the resin. Iron is subsequently eluted at 56Fe/54Fe (i=56). In the course of this study, the stock solution of IRMM- lower HCl molarity. Protocols using AG MP-1 anion exchange resin can 014 used during sample-standard bracketing was renewed. The δ56Fe be found in Maréchal et al. (1999), Archer and Vance (2004), Brantley et and δ57Fe of the new batch of IRMM-014 normalized to the old batch are al. (2004), Borrok et al. (2007) and de Jong et al. (2007). Protocols using −0.004±0.009‰ and 0.001±0.015‰ (95% ci), respectively. This AG1-X3, -X4 or -X8 are described in Rouxel et al. (2003), Dauphas et al. confirms the conclusion of Dauphas et al. (2004) that IRMM-014 has (2004), Poitrasson and Freydier (2005), Schoenberg and von Blancken- homogeneous isotopic composition at the 0.01‰ level. burg (2005), Dideriksen et al. (2006),andThompson et al. (2007). Except for a series of tests aimed at estimating the influence of acid Here we used the separation protocol described by Dauphas et al. molarity on isotopic ratios, all analyzed solutions were in 0.3 M HNO3. (2004, 2007).Typically2–10 mg of powdered sample is subjected to the An enclosed SC-2 sample changer installation (autosampler) sequence of acid addition and heating and evaporations presented in Table equipped with an ULPA filter unit was used throughout this study. 1.Thepurification procedure of column chromatography is repeated twice Most analyses were performed with the Thermo Scientific Stable to ensure complete elimination of the matrix.