DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Environmental History in the National Parks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Environmental History in the National Parks The Role of Environmental History in the National Parks The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 28 number 2 • 2011 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natural parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to he the premier organization connecting people. places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors BRENT A. MITCHELL, President • Ipswich, Massachusetts DAVID J. PARSONS, Vice President • Florence, Montana REBECCA CONARD, Secretary • Mnrfreesboro, Tennessee GARY E. DAVIS. Treasurer • Thousand Oaks, California BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts BARRETT KENNEDY • Baton Rouge, Louisiana FRANKj. PR1ZNAR • Gaithersburg, Maryland MOLLY N. ROSS • Arlington, Virginia JAN W. VAN WACTENDONK • El Portal, California JOHN WAJTHAKA • Ottawa, Ontario Graduate Student Liaison to the Board CARENAJ. VAN RIPER • College Station, Texas Executive Office DAVID HARMON. Executive Director EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, Conference Coordinator P. O. Box 65 • Hancock, Michigan 49950-0065 USA 1-906-487-9722 • infot^georgewright.org • www.georgewright.org Publications Committee JAN W. VAN WACTENDONK (Chair), DAVID GRABER, ROLF DIAMANT. LAVELL MERRITT, JR., ABIGAIL MILLER, JOHN WAITHAKA; REBECCA CONARD & DAVID HARMON (Co-editors, The George Wright Forum) ( 201 1 The George Wright Society. Inc. All rights reserved. (No copy­ right is claimed for previously published material reprinted herein.) ISSN 0792-4715. Editorial and manuscript submission guidelines may he found at www.georgewright.org/forum. Text paper is made of 50% recy­ cled fibers. Printed by Book Concern Printers, Hancock, Michigan. The George Wright Society is a member of US/ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites—U.S. Committee) and IUCN, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 28 number 2 • 2011 Society News, Notes & Mail • 112 A Legacy of Neglect: The Ozark National Scenic Riverways Susan Flader • 114 The Role of Environmental History in the National Parks David Louter and Lisa Mighetto, guest editors Introduction David Louter and Lisa Mighetto • 127 Toward a History of Environmental History in the National Parks Mark Fiege • 128 The Need for Legible Landscapes: Environmental History and NPS Management at Apostle Islands National Lakeshore James W. Feldman • 148 The Changing Face of the Country: Environmental History and the Legacy of the Civil War at Stones River National Battlefield Rebecca Conard • 161 Isle Royale National Park: Balancing Human and Natural History in a Maritime Park Philip V. Scarpino • 182 Restoring the Past: Environmental History and Oysters at Point Reyes National Seashore Timothy Babalis • 199 The State of Climate Change Adaptation in Canada’s Protected Areas Sector Christopher J. Lemieux, Thomas J. Beechey, Daniel J. Scott, and Paul A. Gray • 216 On the cover: The area known as the “Slaughter Pen” at Stones River National Battlefield, Tennes- see, was the scene of some of the bloodiest fighting of this important Civil War clash. The Slaughter Pen is now a key interpretive site in the park. See article starting on p. 161. Photo courtesy of Rebecca Conard. SOCIETY NEWS, NOTES & MAIL New rule would clear path for federal employees to serve on nonprofit boards In May, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) proposed a rule that would clear away the confusion currently reigning over whether active-duty federal employees are allowed to serve on nonprofit boards. At present, each federal department has its own interpretation as to whether service on outside boards is prima facie a potential conflict of interest; within departments, individual agencies also interpret what is permissible differently. Last year, the National Park Service, acting under the direction of the Department of the Interior, prohibited its employees from serving on the board of the George Wright Society, citing the potential for a conflict of interest because of the close working relationship be- tween NPS and GWS and because of the number of NPS employees serving on the GWS Board. The new rule could potentially open the door to NPS employees serving again. Public comment on the proposed rule concluded in early July, and we sent a letter strongly supporting it. “It is very important for current federal employees to have the opportunity to take part fully in the activities of professional societies, including serving in governance posi- tions,” our letter said. The federal government must recognize that “federal employees who are themselves professionals have a legitimate expanded role to play: both as representatives of their agency, and as members of a professional community committed to making intellec- tual advances in the discipline and upholding the integrity of professional conduct within the discipline. Membership in professional organizations, up to and including serving on their governing boards, is a vital part of professional growth and career development.” A decision on the proposed rule is expected within a year. Next Park Break scheduled for March 2012 The next installment of the Park Break alternative spring break program will be held at Dela- ware Water Gap National Recreation Area in Pennsylvania, March 19–23, 2012. Park Break is an all-expenses-paid, park-based field seminar for graduate students who are thinking about a career in park management or park-related research and education. Park Break puts grad students in a national park unit for up to a week’s worth of field and classroom activi- ties in close collaboration with park scientists and scholars, managers and administrators, and partner organizations. The 2012 Park Break project topic will be the creation of a curriculum on sustainable living to be used at the Pocono Environmental Education Center. Park Break student participants will draw on the context of several energy projects that are affecting or could affect the park, such as natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale formation north of the park, to the propos- al for a power line that would cross the park. Park Break is a joint program of the GWS, National Park Service, and US Geological Survey. For more information, go to http://www.georgewright.org/parkbreak. 112 The George Wright Forum Copies of GWS2011 Program & Abstracts available to members for nominal fee Did you miss the GWS2011 Conference, but would like to know what happened in New Orleans? We have a small number of copies of the GWS Program booklet (44 pp.) and the Abstracts book (232 pp.) available as a set, and would love to get them into your hands. For GWS members, we’ll provide you copies for just a $4.00 shipping charge (to US addresses only; if you are a member outside the US, contact us for shipping costs). For non-members, the cost is $18.00. Contact us at [email protected] for ordering instructions. Annual GWS Board election to commence in September As noted in the last issue, this year there are two seats on the Board of Directors up for election. One is held by Gary E. Davis, who will be running for re-election, and the other by Rebecca Conard, who is stepping down. A slate of candidates has stepped forward, and the election will begin in early to mid-September. Voting is entirely online, so it is important that we have your current email address so we can send you a link to the ballot (including candidates’ statements); your email address is also used to gain access to the ballot. If you’ve recently switched emails, contact us at [email protected] so we can update our database. Then, watch your in-box for the election notice. Volume 28 • Number 2 (2011) 113 A Legacy of Neglect: The Ozark National Scenic Riverways Susan Flader Missouri’s Current River and its tributary, the Jacks Fork, were the nation’s first fed- erally protected rivers. Congressionally authorized in 1964 as the Ozark National Scenic Riverways (ONSR), they served as a prototype for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968. But in May 2011 ONSR was identified by American Rivers as one of America’s ten most endangered rivers, owing to a history of inadequate management by the National Park Service (NPS). The spring-fed, bluff-lined Current and Jacks Fork are the preeminent “float streams” in a state where floating, fishing, and camping by johnboat or canoe have long been favorite pastimes (Figure 1). The state’s first Republican governor since Reconstruction, Herbert Hadley, led well-publicized float trips on Current River as early as 1909 in an effort to pro- mote tourism and build support for a state park system. When Missouri acquired its first state parks in 1924, they included Round Spring and Big Spring on the Current River and Alley Spring on the Jacks Fork. The rivers early attracted admirers from afar; Aldo Leopold came from Wisconsin in 1926 to float the Current from Van Buren to Doniphan with his brothers (Leopold 1953; Figure 2), then in 1929 bought a shanty on its bank as a base for annual hunts, years before he acquired his celebrated shack in the sand country of Wisconsin. Like many other rivers that eventually won designation as national wild and scenic rivers, the Current was threatened by proposed hydroelectric dams.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The George Wright Forum
    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
    [Show full text]
  • New Varieties 2020-2021
    New Varieties 2020-2021 Agrostis nebulosa, Cloud Grass Gazania krebsiana, Tanager y 7 Ajuga genevensis, Upright Bugle y 4 Geranium, Night Alyssum saxatile, Gold Rush y 3 Geum chiloense, Sunrise y 4 Amaranthus cruentus, Burgundy Glow Geum coccineum, Orange Queen y 5 Angelica sylvestris, Vicar's Mead y 4 Helianthus annuus, Equinox Antirrhinum Greenhouse Forcing, Costa Summer Helianthus annuus, Firebrand Aquilegia caerulea, Earlybird y 3 Helianthus annuus, Orange Globe Arabis blepharophylla, Barranca y 4 Helianthus annuus, Orangeade Aster, Jowi Mix Helianthus annuus, Star Gold Basil, Purple Ball Helleborus x hybrida, Orientalis Double Ladies Mix y 3 Begonia boliviensis, Groovy Heuchera sanguinea, Coral Petite y 3 Bidens ferulifolia y 8 Iberis sempervirens, Snow Cushion y 3 Bigelowia nuttallii y 4 Lathyrus odoratus, Heirloom Mix Bulbine frutescens, Avera Sunset Orange y 9 Lavandula multifida, Torch Minty Ice y 7 Bupleurum longifolium, Bronze Beauty y 3 Lewisia tweedyi, Lovedream y 4 Calamintha nepeta, Marvelette y Liatris spicata, Floristan White y 3 Calendula, Fruit Burst Lilium formosanum var. pricei y 5 Calendula, Goldcrest Lisianthus , Allemande Light Pink Calendula, Playtime Mix Lisianthus , Can Can Purple Calendula, Sherbet Fizz Lisianthus , Chaconne White Campanula medium, Champion II y Lisianthus , Diamond Peach 3 Imp Celosia, Arrabona Red Lisianthus , Flare Celosia cristata, Act Lisianthus , Gavotte Yellow Celosia cristata, Bar Lisianthus , Jasny Lavender Celosia cristata, Bombay Lisianthus , Minuet
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Pollinators of Echinacea Purpurea in Relation to Their Perceived Efficiency and Color Preferences
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2021 An analysis of the pollinators of Echinacea purpurea in relation to their perceived efficiency and color efpr erences Carmen Black University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Black, Carmen, "An analysis of the pollinators of Echinacea purpurea in relation to their perceived efficiency and color efpr erences" (2021). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Analysis of the Pollinators of Echinacea purpurea in Relation to their Perceived Efficiency and Color Preferences Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Sciences Examination Date: April 6th Dr. Stylianos Chatzimanolis Dr. Joey Shaw Professor of Biology Professor of Biology Thesis Director Department Examiner Dr. Elise Chapman Lecturer of Biology Department Examiner 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Abstract …………..…………………….………………………… 3 II. Introduction…………..………………….……………………....... 5 III. Materials and Methods…………...………………………………. 11 IV. Results…………..…………………….………………………….. 16 A. List of Figures…………...……………………………….. 21 V. Discussion…………..………….…………………………...…… 28 VI. Acknowledgements………….……………….………...………… 38 VII. Works Cited ……………………………………...……….……… 39 VIII. Appendices……………………………………………………….. 43 3 ABSTRACT This study aimed to better understand how insects interacted with species of Echinacea in Tennessee and specifically their preference to floral color. Based on previous studies I expected the main visitors to be composed of various bees, beetles and butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stone-S River Nationalbattlefield As a the Outcome of the Civil War. Spring of the Union Strategy to Sever the South in Half
    35 THE ARTIST AT STONE'S RIVER Homer Pittard There was a time when the United States Park Service ranked the Stone-s River National Battlefield as a "B" grade facility. This meant, of course, that the winter struggle two miles west of the town limits was somewhat less than of prime importance in the outcome of the Civil War. Thus, it was not a pivotal battle in the assessment of the Park Service historians. Yet, later judgments have placed Stone's River at the well- spring of the Union strategy to sever the South in half. This proved to be successful as the Blue legions moved relentlessly from Murfreesboro to Chattanooga, to Atlanta, and then to Savannah. This segmentation served to destroy or drastically impair the movement of food supplies and ordnance from the deep South to the armies in the East and to other fields of operations. At this early period in the war, late 1=862, at Murfreesboro, the first fatal step may have been taken in the total dissolution of the Confederacy. in many ways the battle of Stone's River was one of indecision and blatant errors that was presided over by probably the two most inept field commanders on both sides. General Braxton Bragg, Confederate Army of Tennessee and Major General William Starke Rosecrans, Union Army of the Cumberland. The battle opened on December 31, 1862 with a magnificent strategy that would have titillated the most erudite West Point professor (Bragg and Rosecrans were both graduates of the Military Academy). As the day progressed, the battle plan, particularly that developed by Rosecrans, began to segment and crumble.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Clewell, A.F., pp. 171-175 Gelt, J. 227 Volume 13 Author Index Cole, S. 226 Getsinger, K.D. 84 Adams, J.C. 23.1 Connors, P.G. 122 Gibson, D.J. 10 Adkisson, C.$. 90 Conrad, M.T. 92 Goeldner, J., pp. 16-19 Aguilar, R~ 194 Cooperrider, A. 50 Goldingay, R.L. 129 Aide, T.M. 162 Corcoran, B.M. 65.1 Goldsmith, W. 52 Allen, E.B. 114.1 Cornu, C.E., pp. 53-57 Goodwillie, C. 130 Allen, J.A. 55 Cotts, N. 93 Gordon, A.M. 23.3, 23.12 Allen, M.F. 88, 114.2 Cowan, B. 188 Gordon, D.R. 31 Alminana, J. 52 Cox, J-R. 3.1 Gori, D. 118.1 Alverson, E.R., pp. 26-28 Crisman, T.L. 100.1 Gottfried, G. 26 Amon, J.P. 39 Crossley, A. 36.1 Gough, S. 48.1 Anderson, M.G. 207 Crow, G.E. 38.4 Granek, E. 140 Anderson, M.R., pp. 61-63 Crow, T.R. 90 Grant, K. 82 Anderson, R.C., pp. 61-63 Cruse, V.L. 38.2 Grant. L.M. 38.3 Andress, C.J. 56.1 Cummings, D.L., pp. 12-15 Greene, J.A. 256 Arguellas, C. 194 Darby, M. 193 Greipsson, S. 199, 250 Armson, E. 76.1 De Diemar, J. 264 Grese, R.E. 1 Arno, $.F., pp. 32-36 Decker-Waiters, D.S. 31 Griggs, F.T. 178, 179 Assar, N.H. 51 DeShield, Jr., M.A. 51 Grilz, P.L. 18, 209 Atkinson, R.B. 38.1 Diamond, D.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennially Yours
    Kerry Ann Mendez 7 Cambridge Court, Kennebunk, Maine 04043 (207) 502-7228 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.pyours.com A Striking Sustainable Flower Garden by Design Sponsored by: Bluestone Perennials www.bluestoneperennials.com Brent and Becky’s Bulbs www.brentandbeckysbulbs.com Brushwood Nursery Clematis Specialists www.brushwoodnursery.com Espoma Organic www.espoma.com Garden Design magazine www.gardendesign.com Gardener’s Supply Company www.gardeners.com Proven Winners www.provenwinners.com 1. Right Plant - Right Place. Checklist for being a good ‘matchmaker’. The short list: *Sunlight *Hardiness zone *Soil properties. Perennial black-eyed susan, hyssop, culver’s root and pink phlox in northern Michigan Sunlight. Full Sun: 6 or more hours of direct sun. Part Sun: 4 to 5 hours of direct sun. Part Shade: 3 to 4 hours of sun, but not the most intense afternoon sun. Full Shade: Less than three hours of sun, but not cave- like conditions. All plants require some sunlight for photosynthesis. Ephemerals can handle quite a bit of shade - as long as the shade is caused by deciduous trees Regional adjustments. ‘Standard’ tags are manufactured for plants sold in a wide range of zones. A plant that thrives in full sun in Maine would scorch in similar conditions in hotter regions, i.e. Zone 8. A large bank on Mackinac Island (MI) planted with black-eyed susan, pink coneflower, Joe-Pye Weed, goldenrod, obedient plant, and Malva. Don’t Zone Out. Zone 3: -30 to -40 Zone 4: -20 to -30 Zone 5: -10 to -20 Zone 6: 0 to -10 Zone 7: 10 to 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document, Stones River National Battlefield, Tennessee
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Stones River National Battlefield Tennessee November 2014 Foundation Document Hord House To 40 (main Union field hospital) Features from the time Shaded area indicates Exit 55 of the battle—road extent of original battle. names, structures, and To Nashville Fortress Rosecrans—are Tour stop Trail shown in GRAY. Some 840 of these features can Stones River Stones River/Lytle still be seen today. National Battlefield Creek greenways Please respect private Original extent of P Parking area for Fortress Rosecrans Stones River/Lytle er property. Creek greenways iv R s North To 24 e 268 0 0.5 Kilometer n o t Exten 0 0.5 Mile S t o f o ri Old Nashville Highway k g r in o a l Nashville Pike F b t a s t Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad t e le CSX Transportation W Hord Road Artillery Monument January 2, 1863, afternoon General Rosecrans McFadden’s A Confederate bayonet charge Ford Headquarters Site New Nashville Highway drove Union troops from their 231 (Union hillside positions east of Stones McGregor House 10 (Union field hospital) artillery River. position) P S McFadden in ki ng Widow Burris House Farm C January 2, 1863, dusk re Asbury Road (Union field hospital) ek Van Cleve Lane Massed Union artillery fire Asbury Lane McFadden’s Lane y a crushed the Confederate National w n attack. Cemetery e December 31, 1862, noon e Pioneer Brigade r G Earthworks Trail Union troops made a determined r Asbury Lane e v stand along Nashville Pike and i Visitor Center C R January 3, 1863 o s in Round Forest, protecting their t Round Lebanon Road to e n n F Forest Confederates withdrew from lifeline to Nashville.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennials for Winter Gardens Perennials for Winter Gardens
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety November / December 2010 Perennials for Winter Gardens Edible Landscaping for Small Spaces A New Perspective on Garden Cleanup Outstanding Conifers contents Volume 89, Number 6 . November / December 2010 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS Boston’s garden contest grows to record size, 2011 AHS President’s Council trip planned for Houston, Gala highlights, rave reviews for Armitage webinar in October, author of article for The American Gardener receives garden-writing award, new butterfly-themed children’s garden installed at River Farm. 12 2010 AMERICA IN BLOOM AWARD WINNERS Twelve cities are recognized for their community beautification efforts. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… David Karp: Fruit detective. page 26 44 HOMEGROWN HARVEST The pleasures of popcorn. EDIBLE LANDSCAPING FOR SMALL SPACES 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK 14 Replacing pavement with plants in San BY ROSALIND CREASY Francisco, soil bacterium may boost cognitive With some know-how, you can grow all sorts of vegetables, fruits, function, study finds fewer plant species on and herbs in small spaces. earth now than before, a fungus-and-virus combination may cause honeybee colony collapse disorder, USDA funds school garden CAREFREE MOSS BY CAROLE OTTESEN 20 program, Park Seed sold, Rudbeckia Denver Looking for an attractive substitute for grass in a shady spot? Try Daisy™ wins grand prize in American moss; it’ll grow on you. Garden Award Contest. 50 GREEN GARAGE® OUTSTANDING CONIFERS BY RITA PELCZAR 26 A miscellany of useful garden helpers. This group of trees and shrubs is beautiful year round, but shines brightest in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Stones River
    STONES RIVER NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD TENNESSEE Rosecrans Advances the southerly course of the stream. This On December 26, 1862, General Rosecrans movement, if successful, would place part of Stones River marched the Union army out of Nashville the Union army between the Confederates and advanced against Bragg's position. By and their supply base at Murfreesboro. NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD December 30, the Union troops faced the Striking first, the Confederates had the ad­ Confederates near Stones River. vantage. At daybreak on the 31st, they furi­ ously assaulted the Union right wing, driving But the advance had not been without it and part of the center back through the The first big battle in the Union campaign destined to end incident. Moving swiftly with cavalry, Brig. surrounding cedar woods to the Nashville in Sherman's "March to the Sea" Gen. Joseph Wheeler raided the Union army, Pike. Only inspired fighting by Brig. Gen. burning and destroying wagon trains and Philip H. Sheridan's right-wing brigade and harassing the rearguard. Starting on the stubborn holding of most of the center by night of December 29, he completely circled Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas averted a of all western Tennessee, as well as Nash­ the Union army, returning to the Confed­ Union rout. ville and part of middle Tennessee. How­ erate lines early on December 31. Wheeler ever, the invasion of Kentucky by Gen. had destroyed nearly a million dollars worth All thought of the Union attack against Braxton Bragg's Confederate army tempo­ of Federal property and had taken 700 Bragg's right wing was now dropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 20033-Echinacea-Report-Interactive
    RESEARCH REPORT Echinacea FOR THE MID-ATLANTIC REGION Sam Hoadley, Manager of Horticultural Research INTRODUCTION Skipper butterfly feeding on Echinacea ‘Glowing Dream’ 2 ECHINACEA FOR THE MID-ATLANTIC ECHINACEA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS CONEFLOWERS, are among the most iconic and recognizable native plants in North America. The earliest documented horticultural use of Echinacea can be traced to the late 17th century when Echinacea purpurea seeds were sent to England by the Virginia clergyman and naturalist John Banister. Medicinal use dates back even further as Native Americans used Echinacea to treat a variety of ailments, a tradition that has carried into modern times. Echinacea has enjoyed continued popularity for treating colds and for boosting the immune system. Although there is little scientific evidence of its benefits, Echinacea is currently one of the most popular commercially traded herbal supplements. The nine species of Echinacea are North American natives and predominantly occur in the central and eastern United States. The majority of wild coneflowers display pink, purple, and rarely white flowers from late spring to summer. Only one species, Echinacea paradoxa, breaks this color trend and produces canary yellow blooms in June. Dr. Jim Ault of the Chicago Botanic Garden was among the first plant breeders to intentionally cross multiple species in the 1990s. Since that time, the breeding and selection of coneflower species has further unlocked the horticultural potential of this genus resulting in a staggering variety of new cultivars in American and European horticultural markets. Today, Echinacea are available in an array of colors including, white, yellow, orange, red, pink, purple, and even green.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Reintroduction of the Endangered Echinacea Laevigata: Comparison of Planting Methods and Effects of Light Intensi
    EXPERIMENTAL REINTRODUCTION OF THE ENDANGERED ECHINACEA LAEVIGATA: COMPARISON OF PLANTING METHODS AND EFFECTS OF LIGHT INTENSITY ON BIOMASS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS by HEATHER ALLEY (Under the direction of DR. JAMES M. AFFOLTER) ABSTRACT In an experimental reintroduction of the endangered species Echinacea laevigata, we tested several planting methods to determine the optimal method for establishing populations in the wild. High survival rates and comparable growth among plants from all planting methods suggests that reintroduction is a promising conservation strategy for the species and that there are various options for introducing populations. Plants performed well regardless of age at the time of planting, spacing, and presence or absence of soil amendment. Therefore, reintroduction practitioners may weigh logistical costs and benefits when choosing reintroduction methods for E. laevigata. Based on theoretical predictions and our findings, we suggest that an ideal method for establishing populations is to plant adult plants (older than one year) in the spring, without soil amendment. This recommendation is preliminary and contingent on the future survival and reproductive success of reintroduced individuals. In order to more effectively and efficiently manage E. laevigata populations, it is important to understand the role of the light environment in the species’ decline. While it is generally agreed that the species decline is in part due to the lack of fire-maintained, early successional habitat, the extent to which light limits population persistence has not been quantified. We compare the effects of high, medium and low developmental light levels on photosynthetic performance as described by light curves, and on biomass allocation. We found no significant difference in photosynthetic response among plants grown at different light levels.
    [Show full text]
  • High Line Plant List Stay Connected @Highlinenyc
    BROUGHT TO YOU BY HIGH LINE PLANT LIST STAY CONNECTED @HIGHLINENYC Trees & Shrubs Acer triflorum three-flowered maple Indigofera amblyantha pink-flowered indigo Aesculus parviflora bottlebrush buckeye Indigofera heterantha Himalayan indigo Amelanchier arborea common serviceberry Juniperus virginiana ‘Corcorcor’ Emerald Sentinel® eastern red cedar Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry Emerald Sentinel ™ Amorpha canescens leadplant Lespedeza thunbergii ‘Gibraltar’ Gibraltar bushclover Amorpha fruticosa desert false indigo Magnolia macrophylla bigleaf magnolia Aronia melanocarpa ‘Viking’ Viking black chokeberry Magnolia tripetala umbrella tree Betula nigra river birch Magnolia virginiana var. australis Green Shadow sweetbay magnolia Betula populifolia grey birch ‘Green Shadow’ Betula populifolia ‘Whitespire’ Whitespire grey birch Mahonia x media ‘Winter Sun’ Winter Sun mahonia Callicarpa dichotoma beautyberry Malus domestica ‘Golden Russet’ Golden Russet apple Calycanthus floridus sweetshrub Malus floribunda crabapple Calycanthus floridus ‘Michael Lindsey’ Michael Lindsey sweetshrub Nyssa sylvatica black gum Carpinus betulus ‘Fastigiata’ upright European hornbeam Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’ Wildfire black gum Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Philadelphus ‘Natchez’ Natchez sweet mock orange Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Populus tremuloides quaking aspen Cercis canadensis ‘Ace of Hearts’ Ace of Hearts redbud Prunus virginiana chokecherry Cercis canadensis ‘Appalachian Red’ Appalachian Red redbud Ptelea trifoliata hoptree Cercis
    [Show full text]