+ Disclosure Learning Objectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

+ Disclosure Learning Objectives 9/29/2014 + Diabetes Update: Guidelines, Treatment Options & Trends Melissa Max, PharmD, BC-ADM, CDE Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Harding University College of Pharmacy + Disclosure Conflicts Of Interest and Financial Relationships Disclosures: Melissa Max, PharmD, BC-ADM, CDE – No COI/Financial Relationships to Disclose. Learning Objectives Analyze differences between the recommendations of the ADA/EASD and the AACE regarding the treatment of diabetes. Interpret recent recommendations regarding interventions for patients with prediabetes/at increased risk for developing diabetes. Describe the place in therapy for newer pharmacotherapeutic agents. Apply knowledge of evidence-based recommendations to specific patient cases. Identify trends in pharmacotherapeutic management of diabetes. 1 9/29/2014 + Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Overview Hallmarks of T2D Decreased insulin sensitivity Progressive loss of β cell function Therapeutic goals are not exclusively glucocentric Optimizing physical activity, weight loss and healthy eating are key Progressive disease Monotherapy failure Next steps? + Inpatient Use Insulin remains gold standard Significant concerns regarding the use of metformin, secretagogues and GLP1 RAs in inpatient setting Imperative that pharmacists be familiar with various diabetes pharmacotherapeutic agents as patients will be admitted and discharged on these therapies + Current Guidelines American Diabetes Association annual clinical practice recommendations, released each January American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes 2012 Position Statement for T2D American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Comprehensive Diabetes Management Algorithm 2013 2 9/29/2014 Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364–1379 Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–1596 + ADA/EASD Summary Metformin—first line Consider insulin as initial therapy if significant hyperglycemia or high A1C If noninsulin monotherapy not effective over 3 months, add a second oral agent, GLP-1 agent , or insulin Each new class of agent added lowers A1C ~1% 3 9/29/2014 + AACE & ADA/EASD Comparison AACE ADA/EASD A1C target <6.5% A1C target < 7%* Monotherapy if A1C < 7.5% May consider lifestyle alone for 3 months if Dual therapy for A1C A1C < 7.5% 7.6-9% Dual therapy if A1C ≥ Consider use of insulin as initial therapy— 9% A1C > 9% Consider use of insulin Focus on total cost of as initial therapy— therapy A1C ≥ 10% 4 9/29/2014 + Multifactorial Interventions Glucose lowering Optimal Lifestyle Lipid modification modification CV risk & tobacco reduction cessation BP lowering Goals for Glycemic Control ADA 1 AACE 2 A1C (%) <7 a ≤6.5 Fasting/preprandial 70–130 mg/dL <110 mg/dL glucose Peak postprandial <180 mg/dL <140 mg/dL b glucose aGoal for most adult patients. Goal for individual patients is A1C as close to normal (<6%) as possible without significant hypoglycemia. b2-hour postprandial. 1. ADA Position Statement 2012. Available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/35/Supplement_1/S11.full.pdf+html. 2. AACE Guidelines 2011. Available at: https://www.aace.com/sites/default/files/DMGuidelinesCCP.pdf. + Individualization of A1C Goal Tighter targets (6.0 - 6.5 %) – younger, healthier Looser targets (7.5 – 8.0 % or more) – older, comorbidities, risk of hypoglycemia Avoidance of hypoglycemia 5 9/29/2014 + Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364–1379 Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–1596 (Adapted with permission from: Ismail-Beigi et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:554) + Antihyperglycemic Therapy Nonpharmacologic Weight optimization Healthy diet Increased physical activity Pharmacotherapeutic options Oral agents Parenterals Non-insulin GLP-1 RA Amylin mimetic Insulin + 12 Drug Classes Biguanides Bile Acid Sequestrants Sulfonylureas DPP-4 Inhibitors Meglitinides GLP-1 Receptor Agonists* Amylin Mimetic* Thiazolidinediones Insulin* Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitors Sodium Glucose Co- Transporter-2 (SGLT2) Dopamine-2 Agonists Inhibitors 6 9/29/2014 + Drug Selection Considerations Duration of disease Which blood glucose level is not at target Patient preference for route of administration The degree of A1C-lowering effect required to achieve goal Adverse effect profile and the patient’s tolerability Comorbidities + Primary Glucose Lowering Effect Fasting Post-prandial Metformin GLP-1 Agonists* DPP-4 Inhibitors TZD SU SU Rapid-acting insulin Long-acting insulin Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors Meglitinides Pramlintide + Weight Weight Loss/Neutral Weight Gain GLP-1 Agonists* Insulin DPP4 Inhibitors SU (neutral) TZD SGLT2 Inhibitors Metformin (neutral) Pramlintide 7 9/29/2014 + Pharmacotherapy Pearls + SU Cautions Risk of hypoglycemia is substantially increased in the elderly Even a mild episode of hypoglycemia may lead to adverse outcomes in frail elderly patients. Avoidance of hypoglycemia is an important consideration in choosing therapeutic agents and establishing glycemic goals in elderly adults. Effective dose generally about ½ maximum dose + Sulfonylureas (SU) Avoid glyburide in older adults Assess patients for hypoglycemia regularly More likely to occur: After exercise/missed meals Eat poorly or abuse alcohol Impaired renal or cardiac function Following hospitalization In patients with T2D, hypoglycemia risk is linked more to treatment strategies than A1C If recurrent/severe hypoglycemia occurs, strongly consider changing therapy and/or targets 8 9/29/2014 + Metformin Cautions Use in renal dysfunction CI: Scr> 1.5 mg/dL male, > 1.4 mg/dL female Decrease dose if GFR < 45, d/c if < 30 Other cautions Heart failure History of alcoholism/binge drinking Age > 80 years Active liver disease GI intolerance & weight loss Hypoxic conditions—lactic acidosis Iodinated contrast material + Metformin Pearls Effective treatment dose generally 1500-2000 mg daily Patient counseling GI distress in ~30%, transient Administer with meals, consider XR formulation B12 + TZD Pearls May be used in renal impairment Do not cause hypoglycemia Should not be used in patients with class III or IV HF AE: edema, fractures, bladder CA 9 9/29/2014 + Recent Approvals SGLT2 Inhibitors DPP4 Inhibitor/Combo Canagliflozin Alogliptin Dapagliflozin Alogliptin + metformin Empagliflozin Alogliptin + pioglitazone + Recent Approvals GLP1 Agonist New Indication Albiglutide Liraglutide Once weekly; SQ 3 mg daily 30 mg once weekly; FDA committee may increase to 50 mg recommendation 9/12/14 once weekly if inadequate glycemic response + SGLT2 Inhibitors Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors MOA: inhibition of SGLT2 receptors in kidney responsible for glucose reabsorption in proximal tubule Action—reduce reabsorption of filtered glucose, lower the renal threshold for glucose, and increase urinary glucose excretion Insulin independent MOA; decreases fasting and post-prandial glucose concentrations 10 9/29/2014 + SGLT2 Pearls Benefit AE/Risk Weight loss Genital mycotic infections Blood pressure UTI Low incidence of Hypotension hypoglycemia Lipid effects Pleiotropic benefit Renal effects Similar to DPP4 inhibitors in A1C Bladder cancer lowering efficacy + SGLT2 Dosing & Administration Canagliflozin 100-300 mg daily dose; before the first meal of the day Moderate renal impairment [eGFR] 45 to 59 mL/min— max dose 100 mg daily Not indicated in patients with GFR <45 mL/min or in patients with severe hepatic impairment Dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily, with or without food Not recommended for use in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min or in patients with active bladder cancer For patients with severely reduced liver function, starting dose of 5 mg is recommended + SGLT2 Dosing & Administration Empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg tablet CI Severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2) ESRD or dialysis Anticipated availability currently undetermined 11 9/29/2014 + SGLT2 Place in Therapy Add-on to metformin, after trying usual second-line therapies Not mentioned in the ADA guidelines, as these guidelines were published before the approval of SGLT2 inhibitors The AACE consider these agents to use with caution: as monotherapy in patients with an A1C less than 7.5%; as part of a dual or triple regimen in those with an A1C of 7.5% to 9.0%. Incretin Hormones + DPP- 4 Inhibitors MOA: prolong the t½ of GLP-1 and stimulate glucose- dependent insulin secretion, reducing postprandial glucose elevations Efficacy: decrease A1C 0.7-1% Adverse effects: Upper respiratory infections, UTI, HA Pancreatitis Low incidence of hypoglycemia Weight neutral 12 9/29/2014 + DPP-4 Inhibitors Sitagliptin Dose: 25-100 mg daily CrCl ≥50 ml/min, dose is 100 mg daily CrCl <50 but ≥ 30 ml/min, dose is 50 mg daily CrCl <30 ml/min, dose is 25 mg daily Linagliptin Dose: 5 mg daily + DPP-4 Inhibitors Saxagliptin Dose: 2.5-5 mg daily 2.5 mg dose for patients with CrCl ≤ 50 ml/min Alogliptin Dose 12.5-25 mg daily Reduce by half for patients with CrCl 30-50 ml/min + DPP- 4 Inhibitors: Place in Therapy ADA considers these as second-line therapies to be added on to metformin. AACE recommends these as one of several preferred agents, after metformin, as monotherapy. They can be used as part of a dual therapy regimen. They can be considered as part of a multi-drug regimen with metformin, in drug-naïve, asymptomatic patients with A1C > 9%. 13 9/29/2014 + GLP-1 Receptor Agonists MOA: similar to human GLP-1 Enhance insulin secretion Suppress postprandial glucagon when blood glucose elevated;
Recommended publications
  • Treatment Patterns, Persistence and Adherence Rates in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: a Claims- Based Cohort Study
    Open access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025806 on 1 March 2019. Downloaded from Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims- based cohort study Rimei Nishimura,1 Haruka Kato,2 Koichi Kisanuki,2 Akinori Oh,2 Shinzo Hiroi,2 Yoshie Onishi,3 Florent Guelfucci,4 Yukio Shimasaki2 To cite: Nishimura R, Kato H, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Kisanuki K, et al. Treatment Objective To determine real-world trends in antidiabetic patterns, persistence and drug use, and persistence and adherence, in Japanese ► This retrospective evaluation of administrative adherence rates in patients patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). with type 2 diabetes mellitus claims data (2011–2015) using the Japan Medical Design Retrospective evaluation of administrative claims in Japan: a claims-based Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) data (2011–2015) using the Japan Medical Data Center cohort study. BMJ Open databases was conducted to determine real-world (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases. 2019;9:e025806. doi:10.1136/ trends in antidiabetic drug use, and persistence and Setting Analysis of two administrative claims databases bmjopen-2018-025806 adherence, in Japanese patients with type 2 dia- for Japanese patients with T2DM. betes mellitus (T2DM); 40 908 and 90 421 patients ► Prepublication history and Participants Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an International additional material for this were included from the JMDC and MDV databases, Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code of T2DM and paper are available online. To respectively. at least one antidiabetic drug prescription.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetics of Omarigliptin, a Once-Weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
    Available online a t www.derpharmachemica.com ISSN 0975-413X Der Pharma Chemica, 2016, 8(12):292-295 CODEN (USA): PCHHAX (http://derpharmachemica.com/archive.html) Mini-review: Pharmacokinetics of Omarigliptin, a Once-weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Nermeen Ashoush a,b aClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, British University in Egypt, El- Sherouk city, Cairo 11837, Egypt. bHead of Health Economics Unit, Center for Drug Research and Development (CDRD), Faculty of Pharmacy, British University in Egypt, El-Sherouk city, Cairo 11837, Egypt. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are novel oral hypoglycemic drugs which have been in clinical use for the past 10 years. The drugs are safe, weight neutral and widely prescribed. There are currently many gliptins approved by FDA, namely sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin with several more in advanced stages of development. The gliptins may possess cardiovascular protective effects and their administration may promote β-cell survival; claims currently being evaluated in clinical and preclinical studies. The gliptins are an optional second-line therapy after metformin; they are generally well tolerated with low risk of hypoglycemia. The various compounds differ with respect to their pharmacokinetic properties; however, their clinical efficacy appears to be similar. The clinical differences between the various compounds
    [Show full text]
  • Renato Wilberto Zilli Eficácia Em Longo Prazo Das
    RENATO WILBERTO ZILLI EFICÁCIA EM LONGO PRAZO DAS GLIFLOZINAS VERSUS GLIPTINAS NO TRATAMENTO DO DIABETES MELLITUS TIPO 2 APÓS FALÊNCIA DA METFORMINA COMO MONOTERAPIA: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE EM REDE Tese apresentada ao Programa de Ciências Médicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Área de Concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos Orientador: Prof. Dr. Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva (Versão corrigida. Resolução CoPGr 6018/11, de 13 de outubro de 2011. A versão original está disponível na Biblioteca da FMUSP) São Paulo 2017 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Preparada pela Biblioteca da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo ©reprodução autorizada pelo autor Zilli, Renato Wilberto Eficácia em longo prazo das gliflozinas versus gliptinas no tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 2 após falência da metformina como monoterapia : revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede / Renato Wilberto Zilli ‐‐ São Paulo, 2017. Tese(doutorado)--Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Programa de Ciências Médicas. Área de concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos. Orientador: Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva. Descritores: 1.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 2.Metanálise 3.Terapia combinada 4.Falha de tratamento 5.Metformina 6.Inibidores da dipeptidil peptidase IV 7.Transportador 2 de glucose‐sódio/inibidores 8.Empagliflozina 9.Dapagliflozina 10.Saxagliptina USP/FM/DBD ‐302/17 Esta tese de doutorado está de acordo com as seguintes normas, em vigor no momento desta publicação: Referências: adaptado de International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (Vancouver). Guia de apresentação e dissertações, teses e monografias. Elaborado por Anneliese Cordeiro da Cunha, Maria Julia de A.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Efficacy of Omarigliptin (MK-3102), a Novel Once-Weekly
    2106 Diabetes Care Volume 38, November 2015 fi Wayne H.-H. Sheu,1 Ira Gantz,2 Safety and Ef cacy of Omarigliptin Menghui Chen,2 Shailaja Suryawanshi,2 Arpana Mirza,2 Barry J. Goldstein,2 (MK-3102), a Novel Once-Weekly Keith D. Kaufman,2 and Samuel S. Engel2 DPP-4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care 2015;38:2106–2114 | DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0109 OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to determine the optimal dose of omarigliptin, a once- weekly (q.w.) dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and evaluate the long-term safety of that dose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week, dose-range finding study, 685 oral antihy- perglycemic agent-na¨ıve or washed-out subjects with type 2 diabetes were random- ized to one of five once-weekly doses of omarigliptin (0.25 mg, 1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, or 25 mg) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in HbA1c, and secondary end points were 2-h postmeal glucose (PMG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. Subjects who completed the base study were eligible to enter a 66-week extension study. RESULTS Once-weekly treatment for 12 weeks with omarigliptin provided dose-related reduc- 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, De- partment of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND THERAPEUTICS tions in HbA , 2-h PMG, and FPG.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated with Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-Analysis
    Online Supplementary Content Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Nicolucci A, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9400. eMethods. Summary of Statistical Analysis eTable 1. Search Strategies eTable 2. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 3. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 4. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea eTable 5. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 6. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 7. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin plus Sulfonylurea eTable 8. Estimated Global Inconsistency in Networks of Outcomes eTable 9. Estimated Heterogeneity in Networks eTable 10. Definitions of Treatment Failure Outcome eTable 11. Contributions of Direct Evidence to the Networks of Treatments eTable 12. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 13. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes When Used in Dual Therapy (in Addition to Metformin) eTable 14. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Effects for Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy eTable 15. Meta-regression Analyses for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy (Compared With Metformin) eTable 16. Subgroup Analyses of Individual Sulfonylurea Drugs (as Monotherapy) on Hypoglycemia eTable 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Trelagliptin (SYR-472, Zafatek), Novel Once- Weekly Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes, Inhibits Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Via a Non-Covalent Mechanism
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Trelagliptin (SYR-472, Zafatek), Novel Once- Weekly Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes, Inhibits Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) via a Non-Covalent Mechanism Charles E. Grimshaw1*, Andy Jennings2, Ruhi Kamran1, Hikaru Ueno3, Nobuhiro Nishigaki3, Takuo Kosaka4, Akiyoshi Tani4, Hiroki Sano5, Yoshinobu Kinugawa5, Emiko Koumura5, Lihong Shi1¤, Koji Takeuchi3 a11111 1 Enzymology and Biophysical Chemistry, Takeda California, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America, 2 Computational Sciences and Crystallography, Takeda California, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America, 3 Cardiovascular and Metabolic Drug Discovery Unit, Pharmaceutical Research Division, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan, 4 Bio-Molecular Research Laboratories, Pharmaceutical Research Division, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan, 5 Takeda Development Center Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Osaka, Japan OPEN ACCESS ¤ Current address: Celgene Quanticel Research, San Diego, California, United States of America * Citation: Grimshaw CE, Jennings A, Kamran R, [email protected] Ueno H, Nishigaki N, Kosaka T, et al. (2016) Trelagliptin (SYR-472, Zafatek), Novel Once-Weekly Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes, Inhibits Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) via a Non-Covalent Mechanism. Abstract PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157509. doi:10.1371/journal. Trelagliptin (SYR-472), a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, shows sustained efficacy by pone.0157509 once-weekly dosing in type 2 diabetes patients. In this study, we characterized in vitro proper- Editor: Alessandro Giuffrè, National Research ties of trelagliptin, which exhibited approximately 4- and 12-fold more potent inhibition against Council of Italy (CNR), ITALY human dipeptidyl peptidase-4 than alogliptin and sitagliptin, respectively, and >10,000-fold Received: February 10, 2016 selectivity over related proteases including dipeptidyl peptidase-8 and dipeptidyl peptidase-9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Impact of Glucose-Lowering Therapies on Cardiovascular System in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
    World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2020, 07(01), 162–173 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews e-ISSN: 2581-9615, Cross Ref DOI: 10.30574/wjarr Journal homepage: https://www.wjarr.com (REVIEW ARTICLE) A review on impact of glucose-lowering therapies on cardiovascular system in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients Khatoon Ruquiyyah and Hoda Quaisul * Lloyd Institute of Management and Technology (Pharm), Plot No. 11, Knowledge Park-2, Greater Noida, India. Publication history: Received on 01 July 2020; revised on 10 July 2020; accepted on 12 July 2020 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.7.1.0242 Abstract The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), a well-renowned metabolic diseases that comes under Top-10 lethal and incurable disease of the world, is increasing day by day. It is well-reported that the mortality rate of diabetic patients due to comorbidities is higher. Diabetic patients suffer from several cardiovascular events and such risk increases with an intermediate metabolite HbA1c. Control in HbA1c and lowering it does not appear to yield the same benefit on macrovascular endpoints, as observed for microvascular endpoints. Moreover, secondary diseases caused by diabetes mellitus are many and diabetic patients have been found to be more susceptible to diseases like cardiac injury. For instance, rosiglitazone has been found to cause myocardial infarction and ultimately leads to heart failure. Glucagon like Peptide -1 (GLP-1) agonists and sodium- glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors causes several cardiac side effects like myocardial infarction and stroke. In this concern, USFDA officially announced in2008 that all new glucose-lowering agents should be tested for its cardiac safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk of Any Hypoglycemia with New Antihyperglycemic Agents in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Risk of Any Hypoglycemia with New Antihyperglycemic Agents in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Sanaz Kamalinia A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto © Copyright by Sanaz Kamalinia (2019) Risk of Any Hypoglycemia with New Antihyperglycemic Agents in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Sanaz Kamalinia Master of Science Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto 2019 Abstract Background : Evaluation of hypoglycemia risk relative to placebo with new antihyperglycemic agents (AHA) including the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter- 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) remains inconclusive. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess risk of any and severe hypoglycemia with new AHA relative to placebo by excluding studies with background sulfonylureas and insulin. Methods: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies, 12 weeks or greater in duration were considered for inclusion. Studies allowing background use of any other AHA, apart from metformin, were excluded. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018095458). Results: 141 studies included in the meta-analysis demonstrate that relative to placebo, risk of any and severe hypoglycemia did not significantly differ for any new AHA. ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my program advisor committee members. To my supervisor Dr Tobe, thank you for accepting me as your student and presenting me with this challenge. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Especially given your positive words of encouragement and insightful guidance for every step of this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastering the Outpatient Type 2 Management Objectives
    Jorge De Jesús MD Mastering the outpatient Type 2 Management Objectives: After this presentation you will be able to recognize: .Diabetes Mellitus is a progressive disease .Prevention is possible for selected high risk individuals • Outline the clinical considerations in the selection of pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes, including degree of A1C lowering achieved, patient- specific concerns, adverse drug reactions, and contraindications • Discuss the role and timing of combination therapy in achieving A1C goals • Explain the implications of recent, large randomized clinical trials on clinical decision-making • Modifications in 2019 ADA guidelines based on recent RCT trials Individualize Choose A1c goal 7% for most patients < 7% younger with few comorbidities Older group with multiple Comorbidities could be around 8% Glucose-lowering medication in type 2 diabetes: overall approach. American Diabetes Association Dia Care 2019;42:S90-S102 10: COST !!! ©2019 by American Diabetes Association Case 1: Carmen 55 year-old female with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes Active: she takes care of her grandchildren while their mother works On physical examination , she is alert oriented Too busy to exercise. Eats the cooperative no acute distress same food as her grandchildren Height: 64” Weight 188# BMI=33 No alcohol BP=160/100 Foot Exam : normal pulses ; normal sensory Has hypertension and sleep apnea Fundoscopy , no retinopathy A1c=7.4%; creatinine .9 mg /dL; No history of pancreatitis, no no microalbuminuria; abnormal liver function, or CHF LDL=146
    [Show full text]
  • Official Protocol Title: NCT Number: NCT02906709 Document Date
    Official Protocol Title: A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial and Subsequent Open-Label, Extension Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Omarigliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin Monotherapy in Addition to Diet and Exercise Therapy NCT number: NCT02906709 Document Date: 10-Mar-2017 Product: MK -3102 1 Protocol/Amendment No.: 039-01 THIS PROTOCOL AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION RELATING TO IT ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., A SUBSIDIARY OF MERCK & CO., INC., WHITEHOUSE STATION, NJ, U.S.A. SPONSOR: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (hereafter referred to as the Sponsor or Merck) One Merck Drive P.O. Box 100 Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, 08889-0100, U.S.A. Protocol-specific Sponsor Contact information can be found in the Investigator Trial File Binder (or equivalent). TITLE: A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial and Subsequent Open-Label, Extension Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Omarigliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin Monotherapy in Addition to Diet and Exercise Therapy EudraCT NUMBER: Not Applicable MK-3102-039-01 Final Protocol 10-Mar-2017 04MKJ4 Confidential Product: MK-3102 2 Protocol/Amendment No.: 039-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF CHANGES...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/018931 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/018931 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07K 14/495 (2006.01) A61K 38/18 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C07K 14/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 15/0425 10 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, 28 July 2015 (28.07.2015) MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (25) Filing Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (26) Publication Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/03 1,063 30 July 2014 (30.07.2014) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 62/195,908 23 July 2015 (23.07.2015) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: NGM BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications Current Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Pharmacology and therapeutic implications of current drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus Abd A. Tahrani1,2, Anthony H. Barnett1,2 and Clifford J. Bailey3 Abstract |6[RG|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|TGEGRVQT ).24 CIQPKUVUFKRGRVKF[N RGRVKFCUG| &22 KPJKDKVQTUCPFUQFKWOINWEQUGEQVTCPURQTVGT|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ype 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global epidemic with an dysfunction, as
    [Show full text]