DOCSLIB.ORG

Pdf Non-Technical Summary Final EN Translation Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pdf Non-Technical Summary Final EN Translation Download BALKAN MINERAL AND MINING EAD ZIP: 2087 Chelopech Village, District OF Sofia NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY of the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Investment Project Proposal for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of Khan Krum Gold Deposit, Krumovgrad Sofia December 2010 Non-Technical Summary of EIS for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of the Khan Krum Deposit near Krumovgrad Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1. I. General ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Justification for the Proposed Development and Main Objectives of the Project ................. 1 3. Location of the Project - Physical Characterisation, Footprint, Distances to Protected Sites and Other Elements of the National Environmental Network ................................................... 2 4. Description of the Investment Project Proposal ..................................................................... 4 4.1. Project Overview ............................................................................................................. 4 4.2. Areas Required over Project Construction, Operation and Closure ................................ 4 4.3. Project Implementation Stages ........................................................................................ 5 4.4. Production Process. Main Process Stages ....................................................................... 6 4.5. Project Raw and Other Materials, Natural Resources and Energy Sources .................... 9 5. Description of Siting and/or Process Alternatives Together with Justification for the Selection Made Taking into Account the Impact on the Environment Including the "Zero" Alternative. ............................................................................................................................... 13 5.1. Mining Method Alternatives ......................................................................................... 14 5.2. Processing Alternatives ................................................................................................. 14 5.3. Mine Waste Management Options ................................................................................ 16 5.4. Siting Options for the Project Facilities ........................................................................ 17 5.5. Options for Water Supply and Reduction of Water Use ............................................... 18 5.6. Comparison of the Proposed Process with the BAT Requirements .............................. 18 5.7. „Zero"” (No Action) Alternative ................................................................................... 20 6. Description and Analysis of the Environmental Media and Factors, and the Expected Impacts from the Project Implementation ................................................................................ 22 6.1. Air .................................................................................................................................. 22 6.2. Surface and Ground Waters .......................................................................................... 26 6.3. Geological Setting ......................................................................................................... 34 6.4. Lands and Soils ............................................................................................................. 36 6. 5. Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................................ 39 6.6. Wastes ........................................................................................................................... 48 6.7. Hazardous Substances ................................................................................................... 59 6.8. Physical Factors ............................................................................................................. 62 6.9. Landscape ...................................................................................................................... 63 6.10. Cultural Heritage - Cultural and Architectural Monuments within the Project Area . 65 6.11. Environmental and Occupational Health Aspects and Risks to Human Health ......... 66 7. Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................... 67 8. Description of the Measures Planned to Prevent, Mitigate or, Where Possible, Eliminate Significant Negative Impacts on the Environment, and a Plan for Implementation of These Measures: ................................................................................................................................. 67 9. Transboundary Context ........................................................................................................ 81 10. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 81 DANGO PROJECT CONSULT EOOD i Non-Technical Summary of EIS for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of the Khan Krum Deposit near Krumovgrad Introduction This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Investment Project Proposal for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of the Khan Krum Gold Deposit near Krumovgrad ("the Krumovgrad Gold Project") is prepared on the basis of Letter Ref. ОВОС -1402/24.06.2010 from the Ministry of Environment and Waters (MOEW) (Appendix 1). The EIS is compliant with the requirements under art. 96 par. 1 of the Environment Protection Act ("EPA") (SG issue 91/25.09.2002, last amendment in issue 46/2010) and art. 12 par. 1 and art. 14 par. 1 of the Regulation on the Terms and Procedures for Conducting EIAs ("the EIA Regulation") (SG issue 25/2003, last amendment in SG issue 80/2009). The decision to conduct an EIA of the Krumovgrad Gold Project was taken after completion of the procedures under art. 4 of the EIA Regulation. In accordance with the requirements under art. 95 par. 2 and 3 of the EIA, the EIS has bee scoped in compliance with the provisions of art. 10 par. 1 of the EIA Regulation. The EIS scope is compliant with the requirements under art. 10 par. 3 of the EIA Regulation. The EIS and the upgraded EIS scope considers all the directions and recommendations of the MOEW pertaining to the preparation of the EIS, which were provided in writing in Letter Ref. ОВОС -1402/06.10.2010, as well as the recommendations of the appropriate authorities, organisations and affected communities received as part of the consultation process under art. 95 par. 3 of the EPA and art. 9 par. 1 of the EIA Regulation. Dango Project Consult EOOD ("Dango") has been commissioned by Balkan Mineral and Mining EAD ("BMM") to prepare this EIS. Sofia The authors of the EIS are independent experts who meet the requirements under art. 83 par. 1 and 2 of the EPA (last amendment in SG issue 61/6.08.2010), which is certified with appropriate declarations included in the EIS. 1. I. General Investor's Contact Details: Balkan Mineral and Mining EAD Residence Address : Chelopech Village, ZIP Code 2087, Chelopech Village, District of Sofia Head Office Address: Sofia 26 Bacho Kiro St. Executive Director : Adrian Goldstone Tel.: +359 02 930-15-00 Fax: +359 02 930-15-95 2. Justification for the Proposed Development and Main Objectives of the Project The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Investment Project Proposal for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of the Khan Krum Gold Deposit near Krumovgrad ("the Krumovgrad Gold Project") is required under the Environment Protection Act ("EPA") and the Regulation on the Terms and Procedures for Conducting Environment Impact Assessments ("the EIA Regulation"). According to art. 22 par. 3 of the Underground Resources Act ("URA"), promulgated in SG issue 23/12.03.1999, amended in SG 61/06.08.2010, the Investor has prepared and provided a Mining Waste Management Plan as an integral part of the proposed development. This plan is prepared under the terms of the Regulation on the Specific Requirements to Mining Waste Management, SG issue 10/06.02.2009, and the Underground Resources Act ("URA"). The EIS also incorporates the Assessment of the Compatibility of the Proposed Development with the Scope and Objectives of Protection Set for Rhodopes-East Protected DANGO PROJECT CONSULT EOOD 1 Non-Technical Summary of EIS for Mining and Processing of Auriferous Ores from the Ada Tepe Prospect of the Khan Krum Deposit near Krumovgrad Site, which is required under the Regulation on the Terms and Procedures for Assessment of the Compatibility of Plans, Programs, Projects and Investment Proposals with the Scope and Objectives of Protected Sites (2007, last amendment in 2010). The EIS conforms to Bulgaria’s current primary and secondary environmental legislation. The EIA of the Krumovgrad Gold Project aims to define, describe and assess the direct and indirect impacts on the human health and the environmental media including biodiversity and its elements, soil, water, air, climate, landscape, subsurface environment, natural sites, diversity of minerals, and their interactions. This EIS considers construction, operation and closure stages of the Project. It also
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT
    Stakeholder Engagement Plan KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT December 2014 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT BULGARIA DECEMBER 2014 R E V I S I O N R ECORD Revision Date Author(s) Remarks 1 22.08.14 Claire Craxton DRAFT 2 19.09.14 Claire Craxton DRAFT 3 09.10.14 Kate Blacklock DRAFT 4 24.11.14 Ivan T. Ivanov FINAL DRAFT 5 29.11.14 Kate Blacklock FINAL DRAFT 6 01.12.14 Ivan T. Ivanov FINAL Document Review STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT BULGARIA DECEMBER 2014 C ONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1 Purpose and scope ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Objectives of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP)............................................. 1-2 2.0 REGULATORY AND GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK ............................................................ 2-4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2-4 3.0 AN OVERVIEW OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ........................................................... 3-5 3.1 What is Stakeholder Engagement? ............................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Principles for Effective Stakeholder Engagement ....................................................... 3-5 3.3 Stakeholder Engagement Considerations .................................................................. 3-6
    [Show full text]
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • This Project Has Been Funded by the German Federal Ministry for The
    This project has been funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety with means of the Advisory Assistance Programme for Environmental Protection in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. It has been supervised by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BfN) and the German Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA). The content of this publication lies within the responsibility of the authors. Sustainable management of forests in Natura 2000 sites of the Smolyan region, Bulgaria Final Report August 2013 Project Identification: 380 01 266 Prepared by Anne Katrin Heinrichs (EuroNatur) Dimitar Popov (Green Balkans) Scientific supervision: Dr. Axel Ssymank (German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, BfN) Project coordination: Katharina Lenz (German Federal Environment Agency, UBA) EuroNatur Konstanzer Str. 22, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany Tel: +49-7732-9272-0, Fax: +49-7732-9272-22 Green Balkans NGO 1, Skopie str., Plovdiv 4004, Bulgaria Tel: +359-32626-977, Fax: +359-32635-921 2 Content 1 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................... 5 2 Резюме .......................................................................................................................... 6 3 Project background and context ..................................................................................... 8 3.1 Forest management administration in Bulgaria
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Simon Palmer Tel: 03.88.41.26.12 Date: 15/02/2012 DH - DD(2012)173* Item reference: 1136th meeting DH (March 2012) Communication from the government of Greece in the case of M.S.S. against Belgium and Greece (Application No. 30696/09). Information made available under Rule 8.2.a of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * Référence du point : 1136e réunion DH (mars 2012) Communication du gouvernement de la Grèce dans l'affaire M.S.S. contre Belgique et Grèce (Requête n° 30696/09) (anglais uniquement). Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 8.2.a des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l’exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. * In the application of Article 21.b of the rules of procedure of the Committee of Ministers, it is understood that distribution of documents at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Del/Dec(2001)772/1.4). / Dans le cadre de l'application de l'article 21.b du Règlement intérieur du Comité des Ministres, il est entendu que la distribution de documents à la demande d'un représentant se fait sous la seule responsabilité dudit représentant, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres CM/Del/Dec(2001)772/1.4).
    [Show full text]
  • MIS Code: 5016090
    “Developing Identity ON Yield, SOil and Site” “DIONYSOS” MIS Code: 5016090 Deliverable: 3.1.1 “Recording wine varieties & micro regions of production” The Project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and by national funds of the countries participating in the Interreg V-A “Greece-Bulgaria 2014-2020” Cooperation Programme. 1 The Project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and by national funds of the countries participating in the Interreg V-A “Greece-Bulgaria 2014-2020” Cooperation Programme. 2 Contents CHAPTER 1. Historical facts for wine in Macedonia and Thrace ............................................................5 1.1 Wine from antiquity until the present day in Macedonia and Thrace – God Dionysus..................... 5 1.2 The Famous Wines of Antiquity in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace ..................................................... 7 1.2.1 Ismaric or Maronite Wine ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.2 Thassian Wine .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.3 Vivlian Wine ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Wine in the period of Byzantium and the Ottoman domination ....................................................... 15 1.4 Wine in modern times .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry Of
    List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry of Defence, with Private Public Property Deeds (PPPDs), of which Property the MoD is Allowed to Dispose No. of Built-up No. of Area of Area the Plot No. District Municipality City/Town Address Function Buildings (sq. m.) Facilities (decares) Title Deed No. of Title Deed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Part of the Military № 874/02.05.1997 for the 1 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Slaveykov Hospital 1 545,4 PPPD whole real estate 2 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Kapcheto Area Storehouse 6 623,73 3 29,143 PPPD № 3577/2005 3 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Sarafovo Storehouse 6 439 5,4 PPPD № 2796/2002 4 Burgas Nesebar Town of Obzor Top-Ach Area Storehouse 5 496 PPPD № 4684/26.02.2009 5 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Honyat Area Barracks area 24 9397 49,97 PPPD № 4636/12.12.2008 6 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Storehouse 18 1146,75 74,162 PPPD № 1892/2001 7 Burgas Sozopol Town of Atiya Military station, by Bl. 11 Military club 1 240 PPPD № 3778/22.11.2005 8 Burgas Sredets Town of Sredets Velikin Bair Area Barracks area 17 7912 40,124 PPPD № 3761/05 9 Burgas Sredets Town of Debelt Domuz Dere Area Barracks area 32 5785 PPPD № 4490/24.04.2008 10 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Ahtopol Mitrinkovi Kashli Area Storehouse 1 0,184 PPPD № 4469/09.04.2008 11 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Tsarevo Han Asparuh Str., Bl.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]
  • SEE Subregional Meeting 17-19 November 2008, Koprivshtitsa
    Practical experience with applying EIA in transboundary context SEE Subregional meeting 17-19 November 2008, Koprivshtitsa Nina Stoyanova Ministry of Environment and Water, Bulgaria Environmental Impact Assessment in Bulgaria Legislation { EU z Council Directive 97/11/EC, amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment z Directive 2003/35/EC providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC { UNO z UN/ECE Convention on EIA in a transboundary context { Bulgaria z Environmental Protection Act – 2002 and 2005 (full transposition of the EU EIA Directives) z Ordinance on the terms and procedure for EIA of investment proposals for construction, activities and technologies – 2003 and 2006 EIA in a transboundary context EIA cases { Crude oil pipeline Burgas (BG) – Alexandrupolis (GR) { Second Bridge over the Danube river between Vidin (BG) and Calafat (RO) { Construction of NPP “Belene (BG) { Expansion of NPP Chernavoda (RO) { Mining and processing of gold ore in Krumovgrad (BG) { Construction of refinery for processing of crude oil to end products in Silistra (BG) { Low sulfur crude oil processing plant with annual capacity of 66,000 tons in Rouse (BG) EIA in a transboundary context The case study: “Crude oil pipeline Burgas (BG) – Alexandrupolis (GR)” o Concerned countries - Bulgaria and
    [Show full text]
  • ADA TEPE MINE, KRUMOVGRAD, BULGARIA NI 43-101 Technical
    MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE UPDATE – ADA TEPE MINE, KRUMOVGRAD, BULGARIA NI 43-101 Technical Report REPORT Nº R404.2020 Report Date: 20 November 2020 Effective Date: 20 November 2020 Qualified Persons: Galen White BSc, FAusIMM Petya Kuzmanova MSc, MIMMM Karl van Olden BSc (Eng) (Mining), GDE, MBA, FAusIMM Gary Patrick BSc, MAusIMM, CP (Met) DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE UPDATE – ADA TEPE MINE Report prepared for Client Name Dundee Precious Metals Inc. Project Name/Job Code DPMRES19 Contact Name Ross Overall Contact Title Corporate Mineral Resource Manager Office Address 26 Bacho Kiro Street, 3rd Floor, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria Report issued by CSA Global (UK) Limited (UK Office) Suite 2, First Floor, Springfield House, Springfield Road Horsham, West Sussex RH12 2RG CSA Global Office UNITED KINGDOM T +44 1403 255 969 F +44 1403 240 896 E [email protected] Division Corporate Report information Filename R404.2020 DPMRES19 DPM Krumovgrad Ada Tepe NI 43-101_FINAL_REV_A Last Edited 20/11/2020 15:55:00 Report Status Final Qualified Person and Reviewer Signatures Coordinating Galen White (QP) Author and “signed and sealed” FAusIMM Qualified Person Karl van Olden (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” FAusIMM Gary Patrick (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” MAusIMM CP (Met) Petya Kuzmanova (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” MIMMM, CSci Maria O’Connor Peer Reviewer “signed and sealed”” Partner CSA Global UK Ltd CSA Global Maria O’Connor “signed and sealed” Authorisation Partner CSA Global UK Ltd © Copyright 2020 CSA Global Report №: R404.2020 I DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU Lays Down Animal Health Control Measures in Relation to African Swine Fever in Certain Member States
    COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 9 October 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/178/EU (notified under document C(2014) 7222) (Text with EEA relevance) 2014/709/EU (OJ No. L 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63) amended by (EU) 2015/251 (OJ No. L 41, 17.02.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2015/558 (OJ No. L 92, 08.04.2015, p. 109) amended by (EU) 2015/820 (OJ No. L 129, 27.05.2015, p. 41) amended by (EU) 2015/1169 (OJ No. L 188, 16.07.2015, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2015/1318 (OJ No. L 203, 31.07.2015, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2015/1372 (OJ No. L 211, 08.08.2015, p. 34) amended by (EU) 2015/1405 (OJ No. L 218, 19.08.2015, p. 16) amended by (EU) 2015/1432 (OJ No. L 224, 27.08.2015, p. 39) amended by (EU) 2015/1783 (OJ No. L 259, 06.10.2015, p. 27) amended by (EU) 2015/2433 (OJ No. L 334, 22.12.2015, p. 46) amended by (EU) 2016/180 (OJ No. L 35, 11.02.2016, p. 12) amended by (EU) 2016/464 (OJ No. L 80, 31.03.2016, p. 36) amended by (EU) 2016/857 (OJ No. L 142, 31.05.2016, p. 14) amended by (EU) 2016/1236 (OJ No. L 202, 28.07.2016, p. 45) amended by (EU) 2016/1372 (OJ No. L 217, 12.08.2016, p. 38) amended by (EU) 2016/1405 (OJ L 228, 23.08.
    [Show full text]