DOCSLIB.ORG

SEE Subregional Meeting 17-19 November 2008, Koprivshtitsa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEE Subregional Meeting 17-19 November 2008, Koprivshtitsa Practical experience with applying EIA in transboundary context SEE Subregional meeting 17-19 November 2008, Koprivshtitsa Nina Stoyanova Ministry of Environment and Water, Bulgaria Environmental Impact Assessment in Bulgaria Legislation { EU z Council Directive 97/11/EC, amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment z Directive 2003/35/EC providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC { UNO z UN/ECE Convention on EIA in a transboundary context { Bulgaria z Environmental Protection Act – 2002 and 2005 (full transposition of the EU EIA Directives) z Ordinance on the terms and procedure for EIA of investment proposals for construction, activities and technologies – 2003 and 2006 EIA in a transboundary context EIA cases { Crude oil pipeline Burgas (BG) – Alexandrupolis (GR) { Second Bridge over the Danube river between Vidin (BG) and Calafat (RO) { Construction of NPP “Belene (BG) { Expansion of NPP Chernavoda (RO) { Mining and processing of gold ore in Krumovgrad (BG) { Construction of refinery for processing of crude oil to end products in Silistra (BG) { Low sulfur crude oil processing plant with annual capacity of 66,000 tons in Rouse (BG) EIA in a transboundary context The case study: “Crude oil pipeline Burgas (BG) – Alexandrupolis (GR)” o Concerned countries - Bulgaria and Greece o Ratification of Espoo Convention – both countries o Party of Origin <=> Affected Party o Activity – overloading of crude oil from tankers in an open sea and pipeline on the territories of Bulgaria and Greece o The project is in the scope of Annex I of the EIA Directive and Espoo Convention EIA in a transboundary context The case study:“Crude oil pipeline Burgas (BG) – Alexandrupolis (GR)” { in the period 1999-February 2002 full national EIA Procedure carried out - EIA decision No 8-1/21.02.2002 { two alternatives of the pipeline on Bulgarian territory assessed { several alternatives for overloading of crude oil from tankers in the Black Sea discussed { currently there is no officially submitted information on the actual development of the project EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Second Bridge over the Danube river between Vidin (BG) and Calafat (RO) É Concerned countries - Bulgaria and Romania É Ratification of the Convention: É Bulgaria - March 1995 É Romania - March 2001 É Party of Origin <=> Affected Party É Activity - bridge as a part of the road and long distance railway É priority project included in the Quick Start package of the projects in the Stability Pact for international assistance É Formal developer - Bulgarian Ministry of Transport and Communications É Establishment of the Joint Committee chaired by the Ministers of Transport of Bulgaria and Romania EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Second Bridge over the Danube river between Vidin (BG) and Calafat (RO) Differences between the national EIA systems in Bulgaria and Romania: É Preliminary EIA on the feasibility study - BG É Final EIA on the detailed design – RO É Environmental permits for the bridge – in both countries É Joint EIA procedure É Establishment of Joint Working Group - responsible for the environmental aspects which could be raised by the development of the project É No formal notification procedure EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Construction of NPP “Belene”(BG) { Party of Origin – Bulgaria { Affected Party – Romania { Notification - 10 September 2003 – BG to RO { Expressed interest to participate – 7 October 2003 – RO to BG { Public access to the EIS – one month in both countries { Public hearings in Bulgaria – 24-29 April 2004 - Belene, Svishtov, Nikopol and in Sofia – 4 May 2004 { Public hearings in Romania – 8 September 2004 – Turnu Magurele EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Construction of NPP “Belene”(BG) { issued EIA decision on 22 November 2004 – it contains 50 conditions to be implemented during the phase of design, construction and operation; { conditions proposed by Romania taken into account; { the conditions in the EIA decision are subject to control; { public access to the EIA documentation is secured according to the Law on access tо public information EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Construction of refinery for processing of crude oil to end products in Silistra (BG) { Party of Origin – Bulgaria { Affected Party – Romania { Notification - 27 July 2006 – BG to RO { Expressed interest to participate – 14 August 2006 – RO to BG { Public access to the EIS – one month in both countries { Public hearings in Bulgaria – 28 September 2006, in Silistra and in Romania - 9 November 2006, Calarasi EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Construction of refinery for processing of crude oil to end products in Silistra (BG) { issued EIA decision on 14 December 2006 – it contains 24 conditions to be implemented during the phase of design, construction and operation; { conditions proposed by Romania taken into account; { the conditions in the EIA decision are subject to control; { public access to the EIA documentation is secured according to the Law on access tо public information EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Expansion of NPP Chernavoda (RO) – Units 3 and 4 { Party of Origin – Romania { Affected Party – Bulgaria { Notification - 31 January 2006 – RO to BG { Expressed interest to participate – 7 March 2006–BG to RO { Public access to the EIS – one month in both countries { Public hearings in Bulgaria – 20 November 2007 - Dobrich and Silistra { Sending the final opinions and proposals which should be taken into account - BG to RO EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Mining and processing of gold ore in Krumovgrad (BG) { Party of Origin – Bulgaria { Affected Party – Greece { Notification - 16 June 2005 – BG to GR { Expressed interest to participate – 29 July 2005–GR to BG { Public access to the EIS – one month in both countries { Public hearings in Bulgaria – 17-18 August 2005 – Krumovgrad and Zvunarka { No public hearing in Greece, only statement in writing ( The EIA decision is not issued yet) EIA in a transboundary context The case study: Low sulfur crude oil processing plant with annual capacity of 66,000 tons in Rouse (BG) { Party of Origin – Bulgaria { Affected Party – Romania { Notification - 22 April 2008 – BG to RO { Expressed interest to participate – 24 June 2008–RO to BG { The EIA documentation is under preparation, taking into account the comments of the Romanian party on the Terms of Reference for the EIA report EIA in a transboundary context – conclusions Different approaches in the implementation { General approach – Party of origin/Affected party { Separate EIA procedures on national level – linear infrastructure projects (roads, pipelines); { Joint EIA procedure { Combined approach EIA in a transboundary context – recommendations { Maintain permanent exchange of information among the countries { Prepare and sign bi-and multilateral agreements on EIA { Use more informal and flexible methods of procedure { Know better the national differences in EIA THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION !.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT
    Stakeholder Engagement Plan KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT December 2014 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT BULGARIA DECEMBER 2014 R E V I S I O N R ECORD Revision Date Author(s) Remarks 1 22.08.14 Claire Craxton DRAFT 2 19.09.14 Claire Craxton DRAFT 3 09.10.14 Kate Blacklock DRAFT 4 24.11.14 Ivan T. Ivanov FINAL DRAFT 5 29.11.14 Kate Blacklock FINAL DRAFT 6 01.12.14 Ivan T. Ivanov FINAL Document Review STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN KRUMOVGRAD GOLD PROJECT BULGARIA DECEMBER 2014 C ONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1 Purpose and scope ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Objectives of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP)............................................. 1-2 2.0 REGULATORY AND GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK ............................................................ 2-4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2-4 3.0 AN OVERVIEW OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ........................................................... 3-5 3.1 What is Stakeholder Engagement? ............................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Principles for Effective Stakeholder Engagement ....................................................... 3-5 3.3 Stakeholder Engagement Considerations .................................................................. 3-6
    [Show full text]
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • This Project Has Been Funded by the German Federal Ministry for The
    This project has been funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety with means of the Advisory Assistance Programme for Environmental Protection in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. It has been supervised by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BfN) and the German Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA). The content of this publication lies within the responsibility of the authors. Sustainable management of forests in Natura 2000 sites of the Smolyan region, Bulgaria Final Report August 2013 Project Identification: 380 01 266 Prepared by Anne Katrin Heinrichs (EuroNatur) Dimitar Popov (Green Balkans) Scientific supervision: Dr. Axel Ssymank (German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, BfN) Project coordination: Katharina Lenz (German Federal Environment Agency, UBA) EuroNatur Konstanzer Str. 22, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany Tel: +49-7732-9272-0, Fax: +49-7732-9272-22 Green Balkans NGO 1, Skopie str., Plovdiv 4004, Bulgaria Tel: +359-32626-977, Fax: +359-32635-921 2 Content 1 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................... 5 2 Резюме .......................................................................................................................... 6 3 Project background and context ..................................................................................... 8 3.1 Forest management administration in Bulgaria
    [Show full text]
  • List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry Of
    List of Released Real Estates in the Administration of the Ministry of Defence, with Private Public Property Deeds (PPPDs), of which Property the MoD is Allowed to Dispose No. of Built-up No. of Area of Area the Plot No. District Municipality City/Town Address Function Buildings (sq. m.) Facilities (decares) Title Deed No. of Title Deed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Part of the Military № 874/02.05.1997 for the 1 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Slaveykov Hospital 1 545,4 PPPD whole real estate 2 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Kapcheto Area Storehouse 6 623,73 3 29,143 PPPD № 3577/2005 3 Burgas Burgas City of Burgas Sarafovo Storehouse 6 439 5,4 PPPD № 2796/2002 4 Burgas Nesebar Town of Obzor Top-Ach Area Storehouse 5 496 PPPD № 4684/26.02.2009 5 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Honyat Area Barracks area 24 9397 49,97 PPPD № 4636/12.12.2008 6 Burgas Pomorie Town of Pomorie Storehouse 18 1146,75 74,162 PPPD № 1892/2001 7 Burgas Sozopol Town of Atiya Military station, by Bl. 11 Military club 1 240 PPPD № 3778/22.11.2005 8 Burgas Sredets Town of Sredets Velikin Bair Area Barracks area 17 7912 40,124 PPPD № 3761/05 9 Burgas Sredets Town of Debelt Domuz Dere Area Barracks area 32 5785 PPPD № 4490/24.04.2008 10 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Ahtopol Mitrinkovi Kashli Area Storehouse 1 0,184 PPPD № 4469/09.04.2008 11 Burgas Tsarevo Town of Tsarevo Han Asparuh Str., Bl.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]
  • ADA TEPE MINE, KRUMOVGRAD, BULGARIA NI 43-101 Technical
    MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE UPDATE – ADA TEPE MINE, KRUMOVGRAD, BULGARIA NI 43-101 Technical Report REPORT Nº R404.2020 Report Date: 20 November 2020 Effective Date: 20 November 2020 Qualified Persons: Galen White BSc, FAusIMM Petya Kuzmanova MSc, MIMMM Karl van Olden BSc (Eng) (Mining), GDE, MBA, FAusIMM Gary Patrick BSc, MAusIMM, CP (Met) DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE UPDATE – ADA TEPE MINE Report prepared for Client Name Dundee Precious Metals Inc. Project Name/Job Code DPMRES19 Contact Name Ross Overall Contact Title Corporate Mineral Resource Manager Office Address 26 Bacho Kiro Street, 3rd Floor, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria Report issued by CSA Global (UK) Limited (UK Office) Suite 2, First Floor, Springfield House, Springfield Road Horsham, West Sussex RH12 2RG CSA Global Office UNITED KINGDOM T +44 1403 255 969 F +44 1403 240 896 E [email protected] Division Corporate Report information Filename R404.2020 DPMRES19 DPM Krumovgrad Ada Tepe NI 43-101_FINAL_REV_A Last Edited 20/11/2020 15:55:00 Report Status Final Qualified Person and Reviewer Signatures Coordinating Galen White (QP) Author and “signed and sealed” FAusIMM Qualified Person Karl van Olden (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” FAusIMM Gary Patrick (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” MAusIMM CP (Met) Petya Kuzmanova (QP) Qualified Person “signed and sealed” MIMMM, CSci Maria O’Connor Peer Reviewer “signed and sealed”” Partner CSA Global UK Ltd CSA Global Maria O’Connor “signed and sealed” Authorisation Partner CSA Global UK Ltd © Copyright 2020 CSA Global Report №: R404.2020 I DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Ada Tepe Gold Deposit EIS, Krumovgrad, Bulgaria: Technical Comments
    Robert E. Moran, Ph.D. Michael Moran Associates, L.L.C. Water Quality/Hydrogeology/Geochemistry Golden, Colorado, U.S.A. [email protected] Ada Tepe Gold Deposit EIS, Krumovgrad, Bulgaria: Technical Comments Summary. 1-The project will use tremendous volumes of water: roughly 2.9 billion liters per year. The validity of the claim that roughly 98% of this water will be recycled has not been demonstrated. Merely the proposed extraction well in the Krumovitsa gravels requires 5 liters per second, which equals 157,680,000 liters per year. Long-term pumping of this well would, in fact, be extracting water indirectly from the Krumovitsa River. 2-Long-term water extraction will increase local competition for water. It may also lead to declines in local ground water levels and cause spring flows to reduce or cease. 3-The EIS fails to provide any site-specific, quantitative testing of the local aquifers to determine the actual volumes of ground water available and the impacts from long-term pumping on other water resources. 4-BMM operations will crush and expose massive volumes of mineralized rock to chemical reaction; will use tremendous quantities of explosives, fuels, oils and greases, chemical process reagents, herbicides, pesticides, antifreeze, etc.---all of which are potential contaminants, and are routinely released into the environment at mine sites. 5-Contamination of local ground and surface waters will occur over the long-term. 6-Truly “closed-circuit” systems do not exist in fact in mining. All facilities leak to some extent, long-term. 7-Facility wastes will remain on site forever---requiring long-term maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Bulgaria List of Legacy Organizations (February 2008)
    USAID/Bulgaria List of Legacy Organizations (February 2008) Governing Justly and Democratically...............................................................2 American University in Bulgaria, The (AUBG).......................................................................2 Association of Community Funds in Bulgaria (ACFB)............................................................3 Association of Danube River Municipalities (ADRM).............................................................4 Association of Rhodope Municipalities (ARM)........................................................................5 Association of South-West Municipalities................................................................................6 Broadcast Training Center Foundation (BTC) - ProMedia .....................................................7 Bulgarian Association for Alternative Dispute Resolution (BAADR)......................................8 Bulgarian Center for Not-for-Profit Law (BCNL)....................................................................9 Bulgarian Institute for Legal Reform Initiatives (BILI) .........................................................10 Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD).............................................................................11 Foundation for Local Government Reform (FLGR)...............................................................13 Legal Clinic with Angel Kunchev University, Rousse............................................................15 Legal Clinic with St. Kiril and Methodiy
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Naturalis Bulgarica 38
    HISTORIA NATURALIS BULGARICA 38 Gemmological samples: rock crystal from two localities in the Rhodopes, Bulgaria by Stanislav Abadjiev National Museum of Natural History — Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia · 2019 Published online 28 January 2019 by: National Museum of Natural History Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria https://www.nmnhs.com/historia-naturalis-bulgarica/ ISSN 0205-3640 (print) ISSN 2603-3186 (online) Distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) Historia naturalis bulgarica 38: 1–4 ISSN 0205-3640 (print) | ISSN 2603-3186 (online) • nmnhs.com/historia-naturalis-bulgarica https://doi.org/10.48027/hnb.38.01001 Publication date [online]: 28 January 2019 Research article Gemmological samples: rock crystal from two localities in the Rhodopes, Bulgaria Stanislav Abadjiev National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] Abstract: The paper comprises gemmological and other data on several specimens of faceted rock crystal gemstones from two localities in the Madan ore field, Smolyan Province, and Krumovgrad Municipality, Kardzhali Province, of the Rho- dopes, Bulgaria. Keywords: gemstone, quartz, Rhodopes, rock crystal Introduction in the world. There are faceted specimens of 7000 car- ats recorded (Arem, 1987: 158–159). Quartz (SiO2) is extraordinarily common mineral on Faceted specimens of rock crystal or any crystal- Earth and occurs in a wide variety of rock types
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Finance
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE ORDER № ZMF-70 Sofia, 01.02.2021 Pursuant to Art. 183, para. 1 in connection with para. 5 and Art. 184, item 1 of the Corporate Income Tax Act I ORDER: I determine a list of municipalities with unemployment with or over 25% higher than the national average for 2020. The order to be promulgated in the State gazette and to be published on the website of the Ministry of Finance. I assign the control over the execution of the order to the director of the Tax Policy Directorate. MINISTER: KIRIL ANANIEV LIST OF MUNICIPALITIES WITH AN UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF 25 PERCENT EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE FOR 2020 № per line District / Municipality Unemployment rate I. Blagoevgrad District 1. Bansko 12,70 2. Belitsa 38,42 3. Garmen 14,59 4. Kresna 11,27 5. Petrich 10,35 6. Razlog 12,95 7. Satovcha 14,09 8. Simitli 14,42 9. Strumyani 20,65 10. Hadzhidimovo 13,49 11. Yakoruda 30,78 II. Burgas District 1. Ruen 13,75 2. Sredets 16,18 3. Sungurlare 10,90 III. Varna District 1. Avren 13,28 2. Byala 9,98 3. Vetrino 12,24 4. Valchi dol 20,75 5. Dolni Chiflik 14,94 6. Dalgopol 20,80 7. Provadiya 10,42 8. Suvorovo 11,39 IV. Veliko Tarnovo District 1. Elena 11,58 2. Zlataritsa 19,27 3. Polski Trambesh 12,39 4. Strazhitsa 17,09 5. Suhindol 14,52 V. Vidin District 1. Belogradchik 18,55 2. Boynitsa 14,22 3.
    [Show full text]