DOCSLIB.ORG

Delaware River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM | US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES DELAWARE RIVER BASIN | NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES DELAWARE RIVER BASIN DELAWARE | NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES NATIONAL Photo: David B. Soete PENNSYLVANIA • NEW YORK • NEW JERSEY EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM | US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DELAWARE RIVER BASIN CONTENTS WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES PENNSYLVANIA, NEW YORK, AND NEW JERSEY Overview ....................................... 2 Lower Delaware National Wild and Scenic River ....... 48 Dear friends of the Delaware River Basin, The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act . 5 ° Cultural . 50 Outstandingly Remarkable Values . 8 ~ Lower Delaware River (including Tinicum Creek, What comes to mind when you think about the Delaware River and its tributaries? Tohickon Creek, and Paunacussing Creek) . 50 ° Cultural Values . 10 Do you think of a beautiful river valley where one can experience solitude in nature and Ecological Values . 12 ° Ecological . 51 enjoy the incredible scenery of the meandering river and forested hillsides? A family friendly ° ~ Lower Delaware River . 51 destination that provides great opportunities for boating, fi shing, and picnicking? A rare example ° Geological Values . 14 ~ Tinicum Creek . 52 of a large, undammed river that allows continual natural migration of native fi sh from the sea to ° Recreational Values . 16 the river headwaters and back? An intact network of aquatic and riparian habitat that supports Scenic Values . 17 ~ Tohickon Creek . 52 abundance and diversity of plants, fi sh, birds, and other animals? A waterway and valley with an ° ~ Paunacussing Creek . 53 incredible cultural history that relays vivid stories about past inhabitants, including native people, European settlers, and early Americans? ° Geological . 54 Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River......... 18 ~ Lower Delaware River . 54 The Delaware River basin is all of this, and much more. Because of these unique values, several ° Cultural . 20 segments of the Delaware River and its tributaries have been designated for protection under ~ Tinicum Creek . 55 ° Ecological . 23 the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. To help us protect this river system for the benefi t and enjoyment ~ Tohickon Creek . 56 of future generations, we have contemplated these special values to determine what makes it ° Geological . 24 ~ Paunacussing Creek . 56 outstandingly remarkable. ° Recreational . 26 ° Recreational . 57 Knowledgeable people from many agencies and organizations in the region contributed ° Scenic . 29 ~ Lower Delaware River . 57 important information, insight, and perspectives on these values, including representatives from the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Delaware River Basin Commission, ~ Tinicum Creek . 58 The Nature Conservancy, and various other river partners from New Jersey, New York, and Middle Delaware National Scenic and Recreational River 30 ~ Tohickon Creek . 59 Pennsylvania. ° Cultural . 32 ~ Paunacussing Creek . 59 Based on this hard work and thoughtful input, we are pleased to present to you the Ecological . 34 ° ° Scenic . 61 outstandingly remarkable values of the designated segments of the Delaware River and ° Geological . 35 its tributaries. The value statements that follow have been developed to provide a strong ~ Lower Delaware River . 61 foundation for the future management and protection of this nationally signifi cant river system— ° Recreational . 36 ~ Lower Delaware Tributaries (including Tinicum to help us focus our daily attention on the river’s most important aspects. ° Scenic . 39 Creek, Tohickon Creek, and Paunacussing Creek) . 61 We urge you to read these statements and to share your thoughts with us about what makes the designated segments of the Delaware and its tributaries outstandingly remarkable to you. Thank Musconetcong As the National nation’s principalWild and Scenicconservation River ........ agency, the. 40 DepartmentFree-Flowing of the InteriorCondition has ........................ responsibility for most of our63 you for sharing your passion for the Delaware River basin by helping to shape its future! nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water Cultural . 42 ° resources; protecting our fi sh, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values ° Ecologicalof our national . parks. and. .historic . .places; . and. providing43 forWater the Qualityenjoyment................................ of life through outdoor recreation. 75 ° GeologicalThe department . .assesses . our. .energy . and . mineral 44resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The ° Recreational . 45 department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live Scenic . 47 ° in island territories under U.S. administration. ~ Segment A: Saxton Falls to the Route 46 Bridge 962/116359; September 2012 ~ Segment B: Washington and Mansfield Townships Franklin and Bethlehem Townships Printed on recycled paper. OVERVIEW DELAWARE RIVER BASIN WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES NEW YORK Upper Middle D PENNSYLVANIA e l a !New York w Musconetcong Photo: David B. Soete Photo: Jim Davis a r Lower UPPER MIDDLE e Harrisburg ! Trenton R ! i v Philadelphia ! e NEW JERSEY r B a s Á i n Baltimore 0 25 50 ! Miles Dover MARYLAND ! ! Annapolis Delaware River MUSCONETCONG LOWER ! Rivers and Streams Washington D.C. DELAWARE Designated Wild and Scenic River State Boundary Delaware River Basin 2 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN • NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES DELAWARE RIVER BASIN • NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES 3 THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT AND THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN In 1968, Congress passed the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The act “declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation, which with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.” Each designated river in the national system is to be managed in a way that protects and enhances the values that prompted its designation. Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, designated rivers are classified as wild, scenic, or recreational. The labels primarily relate to the degree of development along the river, not the proposed uses. And, regardless of the classification, each designated river in the national system is to be managed in a way that protects and enhances the Photo: David B. Soete values that prompted its designation. According to the act, the three classifications are defined as follows: • “Wild” river areas – Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of impoundments and generally inaccessible except by trail, with watersheds or shorelines essentially primitive and waters unpolluted. These represent vestiges of primitive America. • “Scenic” river areas – Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of impoundments, with shorelines or watersheds still largely primitive and shorelines largely undeveloped, but accessible in places by roads. • “Recreational” river areas – Those rivers or sections of rivers that are readily accessible by road or railroad, that may have some shoreline development, and that may have undergone some Photo: David B. Soete impoundment or diversion in the past. In 1978, Congress used the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Middle Delaware National Scenic and Recreational River (managed by the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area) and Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River as national park system units and components of the national wild and scenic river system. Subsequently, in 2000, Congress followed up on these prior designations and acted to designate multiple sections and tributaries of the Lower Delaware National Wild and Scenic River (including Tinicum Creek, Tohickon Creek, and Paunacussing Creek) as a partnership river. Then, in 2006, the fourth river in the Delaware River basin— the Musconetcong National Wild and Scenic River, a tributary to the Delaware—was designated by Congress under the Wild and Photo: David B. Soete Scenic Rivers Act as a partnership river and a component of the national wild and scenic river system. 4 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN • NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES DELAWARE RIVER BASIN • NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES 5 OVERVIEW: WILD AND SCENIC RIVER VALUES OF THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN 7 Delaware River Basin National Park Service Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey U.S. Department of the Interior Hancock New York Upp er De la w UV17 Upper Delaware Scenic a and Recreational River r e S c Neversink Reservoir Middle Delaware e Rondout Reservoir National Scenic and n Recreational River i c Pennsylvania a n d Musconetcong R National Wild and Lower Delaware National e Wild and Scenic River Scenic River c r ¨¦§81 e N E W Y O R K New Jersey a Damascus t i o n a l R i v e r Toronto Reservoir Narrowsburg Swinging Bridge Reservoir Barryville Middletown Scranton Lake Wallenpaupack Port Jervis Matamoras ¨¦§84 Milford ¨¦§476 Wilkes-Barre ¨¦§380 P E N N
Recommended publications
  • Class a Wild Trout Streams

    Class a Wild Trout Streams

    CLASS A WILD TROUT STREAMS STATEWIDE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REVIEW STREAM REDESIGNATION EVALUATION Drainage Lists: A, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, L, N, O, P, Q, T WATER QUALITY MONITORING SECTION (MAB) DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS BUREAU OF POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) is required by regulation, 25 Pa. Code section 93.4b(a)(2)(ii), to consider streams for High Quality (HQ) designation when the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) submits information that a stream is a Class A Wild Trout stream based on wild trout biomass. The PFBC surveys for trout biomass using their established protocols (Weber, Green, Miko) and compares the results to the Class A Wild Trout Stream criteria listed in Table 1. The PFBC applies the Class A classification following public notice, review of comments, and approval by their Commissioners. The PFBC then submits the reports to the Department where staff conducts an independent review of the trout biomass data in the fisheries management reports for each stream. All fisheries management reports that support PFBCs final determinations included in this package were reviewed and the streams were found to qualify as HQ streams under 93.4b(a)(2)(ii). There are 50 entries representing 207 stream miles included in the recommendations table. The Department generally followed the PFBC requested stream reach delineations. Adjustments to reaches were made in some instances based on land use, confluence of tributaries, or considerations based on electronic mapping limitations. PUBLIC RESPONSE AND PARTICIPATION SUMMARY The procedure by which the PFBC designates stream segments as Class A requires a public notice process where proposed Class A sections are published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin first as proposed and secondly as final, after a review of comments received during the public comment period and approval by the PFBC Commissioners.
  • FY 2007 TIP for PA

    FY 2007 TIP for PA

    DVRPC FY 2007-2010 Transportation Improvement Program for Pennsylvania Modified After June 2006 Adoption Final Version Modified After June 2006 Adoption Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission DVRPC FY 2007 Transportation Improvement Program for Pennsylvania Modified After June 2006 Adoption Pennsylvania Highway Program Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission DVRPC FY 2007-2010 TIP for PA Final Version Pennsylvania - Highway Program Bucks MPMS# 12782 PA 263, York Road Center Turn Lane AQ Code 2010M Cty Line Rd/ Henry Ave & Roberts/Bristol Roadway and Intersection Improvement Warminster Township Funds account for Accrued Unbilled Costs Provide center left turn lane areas and/or median barriers on Old York Road between County Line Road & Henry Ave. and also between Roberts Road & Bristol Road. LET TIP Program Years ($ 000) Later FYs Phase Fund FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 CON STU 2,063 Fiscal Year Total 2,063 0 0 0 0 Total FY 07-10 2,063 MPMS# 12923 Bristol Road Extension AQ Code 2020M US 202 to Park Avenue Major SOV Capacity Two Lane Extension Subcorr(s): 8H Chalfont Borough; New Britain Borough; New Britain Township Provide a two lane extension of Bristol Road (approximately 2000 ft.) from US 202 to Park Avenue. When completed, this improvement will provide a two-lane bypass around Chalfont Borough which will eliminate trips on US 202 and turning movements at the US 202/PA 152 intersection. SAFETEA DEMO #500 - $1.6 Million SAFETEA DEMO #4775 - $400,000 TIP Program Years ($ 000) Later FYs Phase Fund FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010
  • Hydrogeology and Ground-Water Quality of Northern Bucks County, Pennsylvania

    Hydrogeology and Ground-Water Quality of Northern Bucks County, Pennsylvania

    HYDROGEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER QUALITY OF NORTHERN BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA by Ronald A. Sloto and Curtis L Schreftier ' U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4109 Prepared in cooperation with NEW HOPE BOROUGH AND BRIDGETON, BUCKINGHAM, NOCKAMIXON, PLUMSTEAD, SOLEBURY, SPRINGFIELD, TINICUM, AND WRIGHTSTOWN TOWNSHIPS Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 840 Market Street Denver Federal Center Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ..................................................................... 2 Location and physiography ............................................................. 2 Climate...............................................................................3 Well-numbering system................................................................. 4 Borehole geophysical logging............................................................4 Previous investigations ................................................................. 6 Acknowledgments....................................................................
  • Lehigh Valley Watershed

    Lehigh Valley Watershed

    LEHIGH VALLEY WATERSHED ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY 4.1. WATERSHEDS AND WETLANDS UNIT PLAN Submitted by: Therese Ehrenreich Whitehall High School Summer 2002 (610) 437-5081 ext. 1202 [email protected] ehrenreicht.hypermart.net TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO WATERSHEDS AND WETLANDS A. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY AND MAPPING EES 4.1.A.10, 4.1.B.10, 4.1.E.10 1. MAPPING - KEY TERMS 2. MAPPING – ACTIVITY 3. PENNSYLVANIA WATERSHEDS B. MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS AND INDICATORS EES 4.1.C.10, 4.1.D.10 1. WETLAND ENVIRONMENTS 2. AQUATIC COMMUNITIES a. FLOWING WATER (LOTIC) b. STANDING WATER (LENTIC) 3. WATER STUDY 4. SOIL STUDY 5. WATERSHED INDICATORS C. MODEL WATERSHEDS EES 4.1A.10, 4.1.B.10, 4.1.C.10, 4.1.D.10, 4.1.E.10 1. MODEL - BUILDING 2. MODEL - LAB II. FIELD TRIP – WATERSHED WHEELS ESS 4.1.A.10, 4.A.B.10, 4.1.C.10, 4.1.D.10, 4.1.E.10 A. FLOWING WATER (LOTIC): RIVERS AND STREAMS B. STANDING WATER (LENTIC): IMPOUNDED WATER III. WILD THINGS – JOURNEY THROUGH TIME BROCHURE ESS 4.1.C.10, 4.1.D.10, 4.1.E.10 IV. RESOURCES V. STUDENT HANDOUTS ESS 4.1.A.10, 4.A.B.10, 4.1.C.10, 4.1.D.10, 4.1.E.10 WATERSHED LESSON PLANS ehrenreicht.hypermart.net 1 PART I - LEHIGH VALLEY WATERSHED INTRODUCTION TO WATERSHEDS AND WETLANDS MAPPING, MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS, AND MODELING BY THERESE EHRENREICH WATERSHED LESSON PLANS ehrenreicht.hypermart.net 2 PART I (A) - ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY AND MAPPING Grade Level: 9 th (may be adapted for higher or lower levels) Time Frame: 3 blocks (or 1 week regular class time) Resources: Teacher handouts, resource books; text books Technical Components: Videos; internet sites (see lessons and Resources) STANDARDS (OBJECTIVES): * The student will be able to… 4.1.A.10.
  • Master Plan for the Central Delaware

    Master Plan for the Central Delaware

    TRANSFORMING PHILADELPHIA’S WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL DELAWARE SUMMARY REPORT December 2011 Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Thomas Corcoran This report is a summary report of the Master Plan for President the Central Delaware. The full 300-page report and its Joe Forkin Vice President for Operations and Development appendices can be downloaded at: Jodie Milkman www.plancentraldelaware.com Vice President for Marketing, Programming, and Corporate Partnerships Sarah Thorp The Delaware River Waterfront Corporation (DRWC) Director of Planning commissioned the preparation of this master plan, which Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Board of Directors was overseen by the DRWC Board of Directors. The proj- Rina Cutler ect was led by the Planning Committee of the Board of Deputy Mayor for Transportation and Utilities, City of Philadelphia Avi D. Eden Directors, supported by the DRWC president and staff. Law and Finance Consultant Terry Gillen The project was funded by the William Penn Foundation. Director of Federal Affairs, Office of the Mayor, City of Philadelphia Jay R. Goldstein Board Vice Chairman, Founder, President, and CEO of Valley Green Bank Alan Greenberger Deputy Mayor for Economic Development, City of Philadelphia William P. Hankowsky Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Property Trust Michael I. Hauptman, AIA Partner, Brawer & Hauptman Architects Alan P. Hoffmann Delaware River Waterfront Corporation (DRWC) is a non- President, VITETTA Architects/Engineers Gary J. Jastrzab profit corporation organized exclusively for the benefit of Executive Director of the Philadelphia City Planning Commission the city of Philadelphia and its citizens. The fundamental William R. Miller, IV purpose of DRWC is to design, develop, and manage the CEO, Ross Associates, Inc.
  • Lower Delaware River Eligibility Determination for DRBC Declaration of Special Protection Waters

    Lower Delaware River Eligibility Determination for DRBC Declaration of Special Protection Waters

    Lower Delaware River Eligibility Determination for DRBC Declaration of Special Protection Waters Delaware River Basin Commission August 2004 Delaware River Basin Commission: Carol Collier, Executive Director Robert Tudor, Deputy Executive Director Authors: Robert L. Limbeck, Geoffrey Smith, and Dr. Kenneth Najjar. Citation: Delaware River Basin Commission. 2004. Lower Delaware River Eligibility Determination for DRBC Declaration of Special Protection Waters. Delaware River Basin Commission, West Trenton, NJ. 22 pp. + 4 Appendices. Contents Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3 Water Resources Plan for the Delaware River Basin....................................................................3 Lower Delaware River Management Plan Goals...........................................................................4 Delaware Riverkeeper Petition........................................................................................................4 Special Protection Waters Eligibility Determination ........................................................................5 What is Existing Water Quality?.....................................................................................................6 Development of Measurable Indicators from DRBC Narrative Rules........................................6 Control Point Monitoring Concepts................................................................................................8
  • INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed Report Prepared For: Prepared By: Executive Summary Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed will provide: 175 2 MILES OF MULTI-USE TRAIL 2,460 TEMPORARY JOBS $840M IN ANNUAL TOURISM BENEFITS ($4.8M/MILE LOCAL ECONOMIC IMPACT) $2.2B ONE-TIME ECONOMIC BENEFITS Table of Contents What is the East Coast Greenway? 5 The East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed 6 What the Greenway Connects 8 Transport + Safety Benefits 10 Case Study: Jack A. Markell Trail 12 Economic Benefits + Planning for Equity 14 Case Study: Bristol Borough 20 Health Benefits 22 Environmental Benefits 24 Case Study: Riverfront North Partnership 26 Conclusion 28 Bartram’s Mile segment of East Coast Greenway along west bank of Schuylkill River in Philadelphia. East Coast Greenway Alliance photo Sources 30 On the cover: celebrations on Schuylkill River Trail Schuylkill Banks photos ME Calais Bangor Augusta Portland NH Delaware Portsmouth MA Boston Watershed NY Hartford New Haven CT Providence NJ RI PA New York Philadelphia Trenton Wilmington MD Baltimore Washington DC Annapolis DE Fredericksburg VA Richmond 4 Norfolk NC Raleigh Fayetteville New Bern Wilmington SC Myrtle Beach Charleston GA Savannah Brunswick Jacksonville St.Augustine FL Melbourne Miami Key West greenway.org What is the East Coast Greenway? The East Coast Greenway is developing into one of the nation’s longest continuous biking and walking paths, connecting 15 states and 450 communities from Key West, Florida, to Calais, Maine. The in-progress Greenway is a place that bicyclists, walkers, runners, skaters, horseback riders, wheelchair users, and cross-country skiers of all ages and abilities can enjoy.
  • (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents

    (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents

    Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents Page A1.0 OVERVIEW………………………………………………………………………… 1 A2.0 HYDROLOGIC /WATER QUALITY MODELING………………………………. 8 A2.1 Data Compilation and Model Overview………………………………………… 8 A2.2 GIS-Based Derivation of Input Data……………………………………………. 10 A2.3 Watershed Model Calibration…………………………………………………… 10 A2.4 Relationship Between Dissolved Oxygen Levels, Nutrient Loads and Organic Enrichment…………………………………………………………….. 16 B. POINT SOURCE TMDLs FOR THE ENTIRE NESHAMINY CREEK WATERSHED (Executive Summary)……….……….………………………. 18 B1.0 INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………………………. 19 B2.0 EVALUATION OF POINT SOURCE LOADS……………………………………. 20 B3.0 REACH BY REACH ASSESSMENT……………………………………………… 27 B3.1 Cooks Run (482A)………………………………………………………………. 27 B3.2 Little Neshaminy Creek (980629-1342-GLW)………………..………………… 27 B3.3 Mill Creek (20010417-1342-GLW)…………………………………………….. 29 B3.4 Neshaminy Creek (467)………………………………………….……………… 30 B3.5 Neshaminy Creek (980515-1347-GLW)..…………………….………….……… 32 B3.6 Neshaminy Creek (980609-1259-GLW)………………………..………………. 32 B3.7 Park Creek (980622-1146-GLW)………………………………..……………… 34 B3.8 Park Creek (980622-1147-GLW)……………………………..………………… 35 B3.9 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (492)……………………………..……………. 35 B3.10 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980202-1043-GLW)…………..……………. 36 B3.11 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1330-GLW)………………………… 37 B3.12 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1333-GLW)………………………… 38 C. LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK……………………………………………………… 40 D. LAKE GALENA……………………………………………………………………… 58 E. PINE RUN…………………………………………………………………………….. 78 i Table of Contents (cont.) Page F. SUB-BASIN #1 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 94 G. SUB-BASIN #2 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 107 H. SUB-BASIN #3 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK…………………….. 121 I. SUB-BASIN #4 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 138 J. COOKS RUN………………………………………………………………………….. 155 K.
  • To Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania

    To Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania

    The Shawangunk Formation (Upper OrdovicianC?) to Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 744 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Depa rtm ent of Enviro nm ental Resources^ Bureau of Topographic and Geological Survey The Shawangunk Formation (Upper Ordovician (?) to Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania By JACK B. EPSTEIN and ANITA G. EPSTEIN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 744 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographic and Geological Survey Statigraphy, petrography, sedimentology, and a discussion of the age of a lower Paleozoic fluvial and transitional marine clastic sequence in eastern Pennsylvania UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-189667 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-2098 CONTENTS Page Abstract _____________________________________________ 1 Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Shawangunk Formation ___________________________________ 1 Weiders Member __________ ________________________ 2 Minsi Member ___________________________________ 5 Lizard Creek Member _________________________________ 7 Tammany Member _______________________________-_ 12 Age of the Shawangunk Formation _______ __________-___ 14 Depositional environments and paleogeography _______________ 16 Measured sections ______________________________________ 23 References cited ________________________________________ 42 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Generalized geologic map showing outcrop belt of the Shawangunk Formation in eastern Pennsylvania and northwestern New Jersey ___________________-_ 3 2. Stratigraphic section of the Shawangunk Formation in the report area ___ 3 3-21. Photographs showing 3. Conglomerate and quartzite, Weiders Member, Lehigh Gap ____ 4 4.
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan

    Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan

    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
  • Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission BUCKS COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY AND MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission This Economic Adjustment Strategy was accomplished by staff of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission through Economic Development Administration Adjustment Strategy Grant No. 01-09-58005. The statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and other data in this report are solely those of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. The background flood map is used in part solely for state affairs only. courtesy FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SEPTEMBER 1998 DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract TITLE Date Published: September 1998 Bucks County Flood Recovery and Mitigation Strategy Publication No. 98032 Geographic Area Covered: Bucks County Key Words: Floods, Flooding, Floodplain, Flood Prone, Flood Proofing, Regulations, Impervious Coverage, Watersheds, Sub-Basin 2, Emergency Management, Neshaminy Creek, Buck Creek, Brock Creek, National Flood Insurance Program, Levee, Dam, Floodwall, Acquisition, Relocation, Army Corps of Engineers, Delaware River Basin Commission ABSTRACT This report provides a flood recovery and mitigation strategy for those flood prone communities in Bucks County. As an element of a flood mitigation plan for eastern Pennsylvania, which
  • GWP History 1985-2015

    GWP History 1985-2015

    A Brief History 1985 - 2015 The Pittsburgh region is rightly associated with the emergence of American philanthropy, as Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick and other successful 19th century industrialists promoted using their wealth to benefit the community. In southwestern Pennsylvania, as in the rest of the nation, the field of philanthropy grew in the 20th century and professional staff increasingly facilitated the work of donors and trustees. Starting in the 1960s and 1970s, membership associations and grantmakers’ interest groups began forming as philanthropic leaders recognized the advantages of connecting with colleagues to exchange information, share lessons learned and identify best practices. When Grantmakers of Western Pennsylvania (GWP) was established in 1985, it became the eighteenth regional association of grantmakers created in the nation. Like other regional associations (RAs), GWP’s initial goals were to create learning opportunities for members, support grantmaking as a profession and thereby contribute to the overall effectiveness of philanthropy. GWP’s Origins While the organization was formally incorporated in 1985, organizing for the purpose of learning and exchange was an already established practice. In the 1960s, Pittsburgh’s senior corporate leaders met regularly to discuss their philanthropic interests; private foundation leaders held a similar discussion group. After meeting separately for some years, the two groups merged to form the Pittsburgh Contributions Group, GWP’s predecessor. In June 1983, the Contributions Group began to explore whether to incorporate more formally. Although a number of grantmakers participated, William Lafe (The Pittsburgh Foundation/Howard Heinz Endowment) and Phillip Hallen (Maurice Falk Medical Fund) are most closely linked with advancing this discussion.