DOCSLIB.ORG

5: Watershed Issues in Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5: Watershed Issues in Ontario 1. INTRODUCTION Canada is a vast country containing a large portion of the world’s fresh water resources. This precious resource is vital to all life sustaining functions, human and ecological. Canadians respect and value this ‘Our most precious resource’. Within this framework, Ontario both population based and geographical land mass, is one of the largest provinces in Canada. Ontario geographically is a vast province, bordering the world’s largest fresh water body, the Great Lakes However there is still a great deal of ambiguity in regards to how Ontario manages this precious resource. Given the institutional infrastructure currently in place, can Ontario guarantee that the quality and quantity of water available will ensure that ecological and human systems remain healthy? In the field of water management, a number of approaches are starting to develop that address the whole hydrolic cycle, which focuses on watershed management. Lessons learned in the field of water management over the last decade, provide a framework that begins to clarify how and why the watershed management approach is gaining currency in a wide range of jurisdictions locally and globally. In 1997, the United States Environmental Protection undertook a study examining a review of the watershed management literature. The study identified nine key components of successful watershed management:1 1. Political endorsement 2. Enabling legislation and policy direction 3. Co-ordination and a co-ordinating body at the watershed/subwatershed level 4. Sustainable funding 5. A multidisciplinary, integrated approach to water management 6. Clear goals and objectives (related to watershed management) 7. Good data, appropriate technical and analytical skills; and useful decision-support tools 8. Public involvement and partner collaboration 9. Dynamic leadership Ontario is beginning to approach water management from a watershed basis and incorporate these principles, but given the historical state of Ontario’s water resources, is Ontario and Ontarians doing enough? In order to examine this question, this report begins with identifying Ontario’s watersheds and attempting to determine the ecological health of them, with particular focus on the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Sources of water pollution and their effects on human and ecological 1 Committee on Watershed Management et al., 1999; Hooper, 1999; Born and Genskow, 2000; Born and Genskow, 2001; U.S EPA, 1997 in Muldoon and Mcculloch, 1999 1 systems will then be considered. In the following section, a brief look at different issues facing watershed management will be examined. At this point, the report turns to a regulatory approach, examing the laws, policies and institutions working on water management in an international, national, provincial and municipal level. The report concludes with a section on avenues for public support, and provides examples of regulatory tools and organizations that can aid people interested in improving Ontario’s water sources. 2 2. ONTARIO’S ECOLOGY AND WATERSHEDS 2.1 WHAT IS A WATERSHED? Example of a Watershed (Source: www.epa.gov/OWOW/win/what.html) As water flows downhill in small to progressively larger streams and rivers, it moves over land and provides water for urban, agricultural, and ecological needs. The watershed community is made up of everyone who lives there plus all other animal and plant life. The community of humans, plants, and animals depends on the watershed and influence it in some way. Flowing water carries organic debris and dissolved organic matter that provide food and shelter for aquatic life. At the same time, water may also carry pollutants like motor oil, fertilizers, and pesticides. Numerous activities in a watershed have the potential to degrade water quality. There is no "pure" water in nature; all water is "polluted" to some extent. Even in pristine watersheds where water quality is not affected by humans, "natural" pollutant sources are abundant. These include sediment from stream bank erosion, bacteria and nutrients from wildlife, and chemicals deposited by rainfall. A watershed has four important functions: 1. It stores water of various amounts and for different times; 2. It releases water as runoff; 3. It provides diverse sites for chemical reactions to take place; and 3 4. It provides habitat for flora and fauna. The first two functions are physical in nature and are termed hydrologic functions (Fig. 2). The last two are the ecological functions. Human activities affect all the functions of a watershed. 2.2 WHAT ARE ONTARIO’S WATERSEHDS? The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) identifies Ontario’s three primary watersheds in the province of Ontario. As Primary evident from the map to the right, these include: the Great Watersheds Lakes, Nelson River and Hudson Bay. These three primary divisions have been divided into 17 secondary divisions. Most secondary divisions are either large river systems or groupings of small coastal streams. Ontario’s secondary watershed divisions range in size from 4,000 to 150,000 square kilometers. These secondary divisions are further sub- divided into 144 tertiary divisions ranging in size from 700 to 31,000 square kilometers.2 (Source: MNR 2004) THE OAK RIDGES MORAINE The Oak Ridges Moraine is a 106 km long ridge of rolling hills and porous soils and gravels from which the headwaters for some 30 rivers in the province originate. The headwaters of the main and east branches of the Humber are located on the moraine. One-quarter of the Humber's total land area is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine. It is also forms the headwaters for over 65 rivers and streams including the Don, Duffins Creek and the Rough, provides critical habitat (wetlands, kettle lakes, kettle bogs and natural and planted forests) for many species. The Moraine also provides a direct source of clean drinking water for more than a quarter of a million people and indirectly for millions more.3 The Oak Ridges Moraine is currently threatened by developers wanting to extend Toronto’s urban sprawl. However, too much development on the Moraine 2 http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/water/watershed.html (downloaded June 12, 2004). 3 The information regarding Oak Ridges Moraine is compiled from: http://www.oakridgesmoraine.com/ (downloaded July 20th 2004). 4 means habitat loss for hundreds of plant and animal species. Currently, 30% of the Moraine is still forested; this represents one of Ontario’s last remaining ‘large’ forested areas in southern Ontario. The Moraine is one of the last continuous corridors of green space left in southern Ontario. There is a strong public movement to protect the Moraine currently underway. A coalition of NGOs and citizens groups has collaborated to put pressure on municipal and Provincial governments to stop development in the area. This coalition consists of Earthroots, S.T.O.R.M. (Save The Oak Ridges Moraine), The Federation of Ontario Naturalists and Save the Rouge Valley System Inc. The campaign was strongly supported by the Greater Toronto Services Board (representing all GTA municipalities), the Don Watershed Council, the Waterfront Generation Trust, the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition, 465 scientists and over 100 citizens groups across (Source: Howard, 2001) southern Ontario.4 The health of streams and rivers originating in the moraine depends on the hydrological functions of the moraine. When natural spring-fed sources of water are replaced by urbanized sources of water, rivers and streams are invariably less healthy. The future of the moraine will have a significant impact on the ultimate health of our watersheds and communities.5 4 For further information on the Oak Ridges Moraine see: www.oakridgesmoraine.com or contact one of the mentioned organizations, contact information can be found in Appendix: 5 http://www.trca.on.ca/water_protection/strategies/humber/#healthy (downloaded June 12, 2004) 5 PROVINCIALLY DETERMINED WATERSHEDS The following chart outlines the watersheds identified by both Conservation Ontario and the Ministry of Environment (MOE). As can be there are some discrepancies between the regions identified. Recently, the Provincial government has decided to approach water management from a watershed basis and is implementing The Source Water Protection Act.6 The MOE has “organize(d) watershed(s) into regions for the purpose of timely and efficient delivery of source water protection plans across Ontario’s 36 conservation authorities”7 White Paper Conservation Ontario Lead CA Comments/Rationale Proposals Proposals Essex Same Essex Lower Thames, Lower Thames, Upper Upper Thames Lake St. Clair Upper Thames, Thames, St. Clair watersheds kept Catfish, Kettle together St. Clair Included above Long Point, Catfish, Kettle, Long Grand Lake Erie watersheds Grand Point, Grand kept together Ausable Bayfield, Same Ausable Bayfield Maitland Saugeen, Grey same Saugeen Sauble Nottawasage, Lake Same Lake Simcoe Simcoe Niagara, Hamilton Niagara Niagara Halton, Credit Halton, Hamilton Halton Burlington Bay watersheds kept together/historical working relationship Toronto Credit, Toronto, Central Toronto Oak Ridges Moraine Lake Ontario and Peel/York/Durham Groundwater Study Central Lake Ont, none Included above and Ganaraska below Otonabee, Otonobee, Kawartha, Lower Trent Trent River watershed Kawartha, Crow, Crowe, Lower Trent, CAs kept together Lower Trent Ganaraska Quinte, Cataraqui Quinte Quinti Quinti is already an amalgamation of 3 CAs Cataraqui Options still being 6 Further information on this Act is provided
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Excavating the Past
    What Lies .28 10 Beneath 01 01/ Early hunters in the Toronto region would have sought high vantage points, such as shoreline cliffs, to track herds of caribou and other large game. IMAGE/ Shelley Huson, Archaeological Services Inc. 02/ 11,000-year-old stone points IMAGE/ Museum of Ontario Archaeology, Wilfrid Jury Collection 03/ A 500-year-old human effigy that adorned a ceramic pipe IMAGE/ Andrea Carnevale, Archaeological Services Inc. 04/ A 2,500-year-old artifact made of banded slate IMAGE/ Museum of Ontario Archaeology, Wilfrid Jury Collection Excavating the past TEXT BY RONALD F. WILLIAMSON AND SUSAN HUGHES What Lies .28 11 Beneath For more than 13,000 years, southern in Ontario require archaeological assess - planning guidelines for their management. Ontario has been home to indigenous ments, which are mandated by the Many regional municipalities, such as populations. These indigenous peoples Provincial Policy Statement, for projects Ottawa, Durham, York, and Halton, and once occupied thousands of encampments within their jurisdictions. cities such as Kingston, Toronto, Brantford, and temporary villages. They left no written London, and Windsor, among others, have record of their lives, and their legacy Some projects, however, may not undertaken archaeological management consists of the oral histories and traditions “trigger” a permit requirement. In these plans. In these municipalities, planners passed on to their descendants, as well instances, due diligence is critical, because use the potential mapping to decide which as the archaeological traces of their settle - encountering an archaeological feature projects require assessments. ments. These traces are fragile: whenever during project work can result in costly you dig in the ground, you could be delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-Based Recreation
    Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-based Recreation 2008 Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-based Recreation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The variety of landscapes, features and nature-based recreation destinations in the Humber River watershed provide potential for a wide range of recreational activities including walking, hiking, cross-country skiing, wildlife-viewing, picnicking, camping, bicycling, horseback riding, golfing, fishing, swimming and exploring cultural heritage sites. • Urban development and population growth in Humber watershed municipalities will likely result in increased use of existing greenspace and nature-based recreation facilities and demand for additional greenspace and facilities. • There are approximately 8,800 hectares of public greenspace in the Humber River watershed (10% of the watershed). Most of the greenspace is owned by the TRCA (6,644 hectares or 75%). The quantity of greenspace in the Humber watershed increased by 243 hectares between 2000 and 2005. • Oak Ridges Corridor Park, created through the transfer of 428 hectares of land from private owners and developers to the Province of Ontario in 2004, protects the last remaining natural corridor link between eastern and western parts of the Oak Ridges Moraine in Richmond Hill and represents a major addition to the Humber watershed greenspace system. • The length of inter-regional trails in the Humber River watershed totals 213 km. The total length of inter-regional trails has increased by 28 km since 2000 and an additional 15 km of inter-regional trails are proposed to be built in the watershed. • Numerous municipalities have proposed new local trails in the Humber River watershed, totaling 168 km in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF 303 KB
    HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HEALTHY CANADIANS the aır we breathe AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ir pollution is the most harmful environmental problem in Canada in terms of human health effects, causing thousands of deaths, millions of cases of illness, billions of dollars in health care expenses, and tens of billions of dollars in lost productivity every year. To put these figures in context, the magnitude of deaths Aand illnesses caused by air pollution in Canada is equivalent to a Walkerton water disaster happening on a daily basis. This report compares Canada’s voluntary air quality guidelines with the legally binding national standards in the United States, Europe, and Australia, as well as the recommendations published by the World Health Organization. Ozone, particulate matter, sulphur oxides, ni- trogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and lead – known as the six criteria air pollutants – are the focus of the comparative analysis. The disturbing but undeniable conclusion reached by this study is that Canada provides weaker protection for human health from the negative effects of air pollution than the U.S., Australia, or the European Union. Canada is the only nation to rely on voluntary national guidelines, which provide a far weaker approach to air pollution than the national standards in the U.S., Australia, and the European Union. Canada’s air quality guidelines are weaker than the European Union standards on five out of six air pollutants. Canada’s air quality guidelines also are weaker than the Australian stand- ards on five out of six air pollutants. Canada’s air quality guidelines are weaker than the World Health Organization recommendations for all five air pollutants with WHO standards (nei- ther the WHO nor Canada has a guideline for lead).
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed Ontario Streams Technical Report No
    July 2018 State of the Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed Ontario Streams Technical Report No. 2018-01 Alexander Kissel, Habitat Technician & Alice Choi, GIS Technician, Ontario Streams ontariostreams.ca Summary Wetlands in the Lake Simcoe Watershed are critical to the health of the Lake and its surrounding ecosystem. They cover 18.4% of the surface area around the Lake or 52 847 hectares (ha). About 62.4% of these wetlands have been evaluated using the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System (OWES) Southern Manual. The distribution of wetlands vary with fewer and smaller wetlands on the Oak Ridges Moraine (7.1% of surface area), the Schomberg Clay Plains (5.5%) and the uplands west of the the Lake (10.9 to 12.7%), contrasting with the larger valley and shoreline wetlands in the lowlands around the Lake (25.7%). Small wetlands play an important role particularly in the landscapes where they make up a large portion of the wetlands. A high resolution (15 centimetre pixel) analysis of aerial imagery from 1999/2002 to 2013/2016 for the Lake Simcoe Watershed has shown that many small wetland losses, and the occasional larger ones, add up over this time period to a loss of almost eight square kilometres or 773 ha (1.5% of the total wetland area). This loss is higher than previous estimates using lower resolution (30-metre pixel) satellite imagery which cannot pick out the smaller losses that have a large cumulative impact. The highest losses have been from agriculture (46.4% of all losses), following in descending order by residential (10.5%), peat extraction (10.4%), canals (9.6%), highways/roads (6.6%), industrial/commercial (5.7%), fill (4.6%), dug-out ponds (4.3%), recreation (1.6%) and aggregates (0.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Birds 5 (2) February 2011 26 TORONTO BIRDS – the Journal of Record of the Birds of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA)
    TTOORROONNTTOO BBIIRRDDSS Volume 5 Number 2 February 2011 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Toronto Birds 5 (2) February 2011 26 TORONTO BIRDS – The journal of record of the birds of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) TABLE OF CONTENTS _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 26 – 27 COVER PHOTO: Red-shouldered Hawk Page 28 – 36 GREATER TORONTO AREA BIRD REPORT: January 2011 Page 37 – 52 GREATER TORONTO AREA RAPTOR WATCH 2010 SUMMARY Page 53 MESSAGE FROM THE EDITORS COVER PHOTO _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) Photo © Ann Brokelman This photo was taken at Rosetta McClain Gardens, Scarborough, Toronto , 11 November 2010. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Produced by the Records Committee Toronto Birds publishes monthly bird records from the Greater Toronto Toronto Ornithological Club Area, Ontario. It may also include articles and notes about birds, bird records, counts, surveys and birding in general, with the emphasis on the Editors: Greater Toronto Area and Ontario birds. Toronto Birds is distributed Glenn Coady [email protected] monthly to the active members of the Toronto Ornithological Club. Roy Smith [email protected] We welcome submissions
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto's Milkweeds and Relatives 8 Trail Marker Trees in Ontario 10
    Number 587, April 2012 Female cardinal photographed by Augusta Takeda during TFN outing at High Park, February 11 REGULARS FEATURES Coming Events 18 Toronto’s Milkweeds and 8 Extracts from Outings Reports 16 Relatives From the Archives 17 Trail Marker Trees in Ontario 10 Monthly Meetings Notice 3 Trees for Toronto Web 12 Monthly Meeting Report 7 Resources President’s Report 6 Toronto Island Tree Tour 13 TFN Outings 4 Canada’s Forest Birds TFN Publications 5 14 Weather – This Time Last Year 19 at Risk TFN 587-2 April 2012 Toronto Field Naturalist is published by the Toronto Field BOARD OF DIRECTORS Naturalists, a charitable, non-profit organization, the aims of President Bob Kortright which are to stimulate public interest in natural history and Past President Wendy Rothwell to encourage the preservation of our natural heritage. Issued Vice President monthly September to December and February to May. & Outings Margaret McRae Views expressed in the Newsletter are not necessarily those Sec.-Treasurer Walter Weary of the editor or Toronto Field Naturalists. The Newsletter is Communications Alexander Cappell printed on 100% recycled paper. Membership Judy Marshall Monthly Lectures Nancy Dengler ISSN 0820-636X Monthly Lectures Corinne McDonald Monthly Lectures Lavinia Mohr Outreach Tom Brown IT’S YOUR NEWSLETTER! Webmaster Lynn Miller We welcome contributions of original writing, up to 500 words, of observations on nature in and around Toronto, MEMBERSHIP FEES reviews, poems, sketches, paintings, and photographs of $20 YOUTH (under 26) TFN outings (digital or print, include date and place). $30 SENIOR SINGLE (65+) Include your name, address and phone number so $40 SINGLE, SENIOR FAMILY (2 adults, 65+) $50 FAMILY (2 adults – same address, children included) submissions can be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Rouge River Rouge River
    Rouge River State of the Watershed Report Surface Water Quantity Goal: Surface waters of a quantity, volume and naturally variable rate of flow to: $ protect aquatic and terrestrial life and ecological functions; $ protect human life and property from risks due to flooding; $ contribute to the protection of Lake Ontario as a domestic drinking water source; $ support sustainable agricultural, industrial, and commercial water supply needs; $ support swimming, fishing and the opportunity to safely consume fish; and $ contribute to the removal of Toronto from the Great Lakes list of Areas of Concern. Surface Water Quantity Key Findings: The Main Rouge subwatershed has been subject to significant urbanization with an approximate total impervious cover of 18% as of 2002. Several studies suggest that the maximum impervious cover that a watershed can withstand before experiencing severe hydrologic changes and consequent geomorphic and ecological impacts is approximately 10%. There has been significantly less urbanization in the Little Rouge subwatershed and impervious surfaces make up only 2% of the subwatershed area. As a result, hydrologic impacts and related effects are much less severe than on the Main Rouge River. Average annual flows in the Main Rouge River show a long-term increasing trend of over 1.3% per year in the past 40 years. This rate of increase is significantly greater than that on the Little Rouge River or nearby rural watersheds and is indicative of the effect of urbanization on the hydrologic cycle. The Rouge River has become flashy and now generates high flows in response to rainfall events that caused almost no response in the river prior to widespread development.
    [Show full text]
  • 3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON 4.1 The Don River Watershed The Don River is one of more than sixty rivers and streams flowing south from the Oak Ridges Moraine. The River is approximately 38 km long and outlets into the Keating Channel, which then conveys the flows into Toronto Harbour and Lake Historic Watershed Ontario. The entire drainage basin of the Don urbanization of the river's headwaters in York River is 360 km2. Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2, on the Region began in the early 1980s and continues following pages, describe the existing and future today. land use conditions within the Don River Watershed. Hydrologic changes in the watershed began when settlers converted the forests to agricultural fields; For 200 years, the Don Watershed has been many streams were denuded even of bank side subject to intense pressures from human vegetation. Urban development then intensified settlement. These have fragmented the river the problems of warmer water temperatures, valley's natural branching pattern; degraded and erosion, and water pollution. Over the years often destroyed its once rich aquatic and during the three waves of urban expansion, the terrestrial wildlife habitat; and polluted its waters Don River mouth, originally an extensive delta with raw sewage, industrial/agricultural marsh, was filled in and the lower portion of the chemicals, metals and other assorted river was straightened. contaminants. Small Don River tributaries were piped and Land clearing, settlement, and urbanization have buried, wetlands were "reclaimed," and springs proceeded in three waves in the Don River were lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Parks & Trails Map 2001
    STEELES AAVEVE E STEELES AAVEVE W STEELES AAVEVE E THACKERATHACKERAYY PPARKARK STEELES AAVEVE W STEELES AAVEVE W STEELES AAVEVE E MILLIKEN PPARKARK - CEDARBRAE DDu CONCESSION u GOLF & COUNTRCOUNTRYY nccan a CLUB BLACK CREEK n G. ROSS LORD PPARKARK C AUDRELANE PPARKARK r PIONEER e e SANWOOD k VILLAGE VE VE G. ROSS LORD PPARKARK EAST DON PPARKLANDARKLAND VE PPARKARK D D E BESTVIEW PPARKARK BATHURSTBATHURST LAWNLAWN ek A a reee s RD RD C R OWN LINE LINE OWN OWN LINE LINE OWN llss t iill VE VE YORK VE ROWNTREE MILLS PPARKARK MEMORIAL PPARKARK M n TERRTERRYY T BLACK CREEK Do r a A nnR Ge m NT RD NT F NT VE VE VE E UNIVERSITY VE ARK ARK ST VE ARK VE VE R VE FOX RD ALBION RD PPARKLANDARKLAND i U HIGHLAND U A VE VE VE VE vve VEV T A A A AVE e P RD RD RD GLENDALE AN RD BROOKSIDE A PPARKARK A O r O AV MEMORMEMORYY W GOLF MEMORIAL B T M M N ND GARDENS ND l L'AMOREAUX ON RD HARRHARRYETTAYETTA a TIN GROVE RD RD RD GROVE GROVE TIN TIN H DUNCAN CREEK PPARKARK H COURSE OON c ORIA ORIA PPARKARK TTO kkC GARDENS E S C THURSTHURST YVIEYVIEW G r IDLA NNE S IDLA ARDEN ARDEN e ARDEN FUNDY BABAYY PICKERING TOWN LINE LINE TOWN PICKERING PICKERING EDGELEY PPARKARK e PICKERING MCCOWMCCOWAN RD MARTIN GROVE RD RD GROVE MAR MARTIN MAR EAST KENNEDY RD BIRC BIRCHMOUNT BIRC MIDLAND MIDLAND M PHARMACY M PHARMACY AVE AVE PHARMACY PHARMACY MIDDLEFIELD RD RD RD RD MIDDLEFIELD MIDDLEFIELD MIDDLEFIELD BRIMLEY RD RD BRIMLEY BRIMLEY k BRIMLEY MARKHAM RD RD RD MARKHAM MARKHAM BABATHURST ST RD MARKHAM KIPLING AVE AVE KIPLING KIPLING KIPLING WARDEN AVE AVE WARDEN WESTWESTON RD BABAYVIE W DUFFERIN ST YONGE ST VICTORIA PARK AVE AVE PARK VICT VICTORIA JAJANE ST KEELE ST LESLIE ST VICT PPARKARK G.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailside Esterbrooke Kingslake Harringay
    MILLIKEN COMMUNITY TRAIL CONTINUES TRAIL CONTINUES CENTRE INTO VAUGHAN INTO MARKHAM Roxanne Enchanted Hills Codlin Anthia Scoville P Codlin Minglehaze THACKERAY PARK Cabana English Song Meadoway Glencoyne Frank Rivers Captains Way Goldhawk Wilderness MILLIKEN PARK - CEDARBRAE Murray Ross Festival Tanjoe Ashcott Cascaden Cathy Jean Flax Gardenway Gossamer Grove Kelvin Covewood Flatwoods Holmbush Redlea Duxbury Nipigon Holmbush Provence Nipigon Forest New GOLF & COUNTRY Anthia Huntsmill New Forest Shockley Carnival Greenwin Village Ivyway Inniscross Raynes Enchanted Hills CONCESSION Goodmark Alabast Beulah Alness Inniscross Hullmar Townsend Goldenwood Saddletree Franca Rockland Janus Hollyberry Manilow Port Royal Green Bush Aspenwood Chapel Park Founders Magnetic Sandyhook Irondale Klondike Roxanne Harrington Edgar Woods Fisherville Abitibi Goldwood Mintwood Hollyberry Canongate CLUB Cabernet Turbine 400 Crispin MILLIKENMILLIKEN Breanna Eagleview Pennmarric BLACK CREEK Carpenter Grove River BLACK CREEK West North Albany Tarbert Select Lillian Signal Hill Hill Signal Highbridge Arran Markbrook Barmac Wheelwright Cherrystone Birchway Yellow Strawberry Hills Strawberry Select Steinway Rossdean Bestview Freshmeadow Belinda Eagledance BordeauxBrunello Primula Garyray G. ROSS Fontainbleau Cherrystone Ockwell Manor Chianti Cabernet Laureleaf Shenstone Torresdale Athabaska Limestone Regis Robinter Lambeth Wintermute WOODLANDS PIONEER Russfax Creekside Michigan . Husband EAST Reesor Plowshare Ian MacDonald Nevada Grenbeck ROWNTREE MILLS PARK Blacksmith
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
    DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodging the 'Perfect Storm'
    Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs, Services, and Structures September 2013 Introduction Flooding in Calgary, Alberta and more recently in Toronto, Ontario reminds us just how vulnerable we are when it comes to extreme weather events. The loss of life, devastation, long term social and economic disruption and the staggering cleanup costs in the aftermath of these floods clearly demonstrates how essential it is to have actionable guidelines, policies and programs in place to manage these events. Flooding in downtown Calgary (2013). Source: CTV News Flooding on the Don Valley Parkway, Toronto (2013). Source: CTV News 1 Dodging the ‘Perfect Storm’ – Conservation Ontario’s Business Case for Strategic Reinvestment in Ontario’s Flood Management Programs and Services, and Structures (2013) In Ontario, flooding is the leading cause of public emergency.1 To date, Ontario’s programs to manage floods and regulate floodplains have proven extremely effective and, indeed, the Ontario government has been a leading jurisdiction in Canada for flood planning and management. While much has been accomplished, several factors, if not addressed directly and quickly, will significantly jeopardize the ability of Conservation Authorities and all levels of governments to maintain and improve on this level of management and protection. Flood management is a shared responsibility in Ontario and Conservation Authorities are on the front lines of the Provincial Flood Forecasting and Warning program. In addition, Conservation Authorities bring added protection and benefits through watershed planning, watershed stewardship/natural heritage system management, monitoring and many other programs they deliver.
    [Show full text]