DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda for Meeting 03-2017 CITY of ROCKVILLE PLANNING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda for Meeting 03-2017 CITY of ROCKVILLE PLANNING Agenda for Meeting 03-2017 CITY OF ROCKVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Anne Goodman, Chair Don Hadley Gail Sherman Charles Littlefield John Tyner, II DaHil l Wednesday, February 8, 2017 7:00 p.m. Mayor and Council Chamber City Hall, 111 Maryland Avenue Andrew Gunning, Staff Liaison Cynthia Walters, Deputy City Attorney Eliot Schaefer, Assistant City Attorney Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Reports online: http://www.rockvillemd.gov/AgendaCenter/Planning-Commission-4 I. RECOMMENDATION – MAP AMENDMENT Americana Centre Historic Designation Nomination, MAP2017-00115 – To consider the proposed Historic District overlay zone for the site at 118 Monroe Street, the Commission will make a determination of consistency with the Master Plan and provide a recommendation to the Mayor and Council. Planner: Cindy Kebba, Principal Planner, 240-314-8233. II. COMMISSION ITEMS A. Staff Liaison Report B. Old Business C. New Business – Planning Commission Retreat D. Minutes – January 11 and January 25, 2017 Meetings E. FYI Correspondence III. ADJOURN City of Rockville Planning Commission Agenda for Meeting No. 0 3 -2017 February 8, 2017 Page | 2 HELPFUL INFORMATION FOR STAKEHOLDERS AND APPLICANTS I. GENERAL ORDER OF SESSION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 1. Staff presentation 2. City Board or Commission comment 3. Applicant presentation (10 min.) 4. Public comment (3 min, or 5 min for the representative of a group) 5. Planning Commission Discussion and Deliberation 6. Decision or recommendation by vote Note: The Planning Commission may ask questions of any party at any time during the proceedings. II. PLANNING COMMISSION BROADCAST SCHEDULE Watch LIVE on Comcast Cable Rockville Channel 11 and online at: www.rockvillemd.gov Replay on Comcast Cable Rockville Channel 11: Wednesdays at 7:00 pm (if no live meeting) Sundays at 7:00 pm Mondays, Thursdays and Saturdays at 1:00 pm Saturdays and Sundays at 12:00 am (midnight) III. Video on Demand (within 48 hours of meeting) at: www.rockvillemd.gov/VideoOnDemand. IV. FUTURE MEETING DATES February 22, 2017 March 8, 2017 V. NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS For a complete list of all applications on file, visit: www.rockvillemd.gov/DevelopmentWatch. Applications filed since January 25, 2017: - STP2017-00308, Preserve Pkwy, for the residential development up to 375 units (Tower Oaks) VI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES The following resources are available to anyone who would like more information about the development review process. City staff can be reached at 240-314-8200 and additional information can be found on the City’s web site at: www.rockvillemd.gov/cpds Citizen’s Guides to Development Review and Zoning Development Review Manual Planning Academy Information Maryland law and the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure regarding ex parte (extra-record) communications require all discussion, review, and consideration of the Commission's business take place only during the Commission's consideration of the item at a scheduled meeting. Telephone calls and meetings with Commission members in advance of the meeting are not permitted. Written communications will be directed to appropriate staff members for response and included in briefing materials for all members of the Commission. Planning Commission Staff Report: Map Amendment MAP2017-00115, Americana Centre MEETING DATE: 2-8-17 REPORT DATE: 2-1-17 FROM: Cindy Kebba, Principal Planner Community Planning and Development Services 240.314.8233 [email protected] APPLICATION Sectional Map Amendment to change DESCRIPTION: the zone from MXTD to MXTD HD (Historic District) at the Americana Centre Condominium PROPERTY 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 100, LOCATION: 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, and 150 Monroe Street APPLICANT: Historic District Commission Owner Representative: Janet Wilson President, Americana Centre Condominium Board of Directors. FILING DATE: 1-23-17 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Sectional Map Amendment MAP2017-00115 to change the zone from MXTD to MXTD HD (Historic District), based on the following: 1) Finding that the HDC, at its November 17, 2016 meeting, established that the property meets adopted Criteria A, B, C and D related to its Historic Significance, as well as adopted Criteria A, B, C, D and E related to its Architectural, Design and Landscape Significance (Exhibit 1 – historic designation criteria); MAP2017-00115 February 1, 2017 2) Finding that the proposed zoning change is in conformance with the associated master plans (the 2001 Rockville Town Center Master Plan and the 2002 Comprehensive Master Plan); and, 3) Finding that the proposed zoning change is in conformance with the purpose of the Historic District Zone, per Section 25.14.01a of the Zoning Ordinance. EXECUTIVE The property was nominated by the Americana Centre Condominium Board of Directors SUMMARY: for local historic district zoning, after consulting with Americana residents and unit owners. Janet Wilson, President of the Americana Centre Board of Directors, filed a Historic District Commission Review for an Evaluation of Significance application on September 1, 2016. (Exhibit 2). Staff recommended the property for historic designation based on the adopted historic designation criteria. Per Sec. 25.14.01.d.1(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, the HDC evaluated the property for historic significance (Exhibit 3 – HDC staff report). The HDC concurred with the staff recommendation at its November 17, 2016 meeting, recommending application of the HD overlay zone. (Exhibit 4 – HDC minutes) The Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the proposed rezoning to the Mayor and Council, per Sec. 25.06.01.g, based on conformance with the Master Plan. View of the two residential towers at the Americana Centre Photo source: Peerless Rockville Page 2 MAP2017-00115 February 1, 2017 Table of Contents HISTORIC DESIGNATION PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 4 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 6 ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 REQUIRED FINDINGS: .............................................................................................................................. 12 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION .................................................................... 12 NEXT STEPS: ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Exhibits: 1. HDC Adopted Criteria for Historic Designation HDC 1.Review HDC Application Adopted Criteria for Evaluation for Historic ofDesignation Significance Staff 2.Report HDC for Review HDC Application Evaluation for of EvaluationSignificance of Significance 3. Staff Report for HDC Evaluation of Significance] HDC Minutes, November 17, 2016 4. HDC Minutes, November 17, 2016 Written5. TestimonyWritten Testimony to the HDCto the HDC 6. Map Amendment Application Page 3 MAP2017-00115 February 1, 2017 Aerial – Location of the Americana Centre HISTORIC DESIGNATION PROCESS In Rockville, historic designation is accomplished through a zoning change, when the Historic District (HD) overlay zone is applied to a particular property by the Mayor and Council. Per Sec. 25.14.01.d, any person may nominate a property for historic designation, thereby initiating the designation process. In this case, the property owners, represented by Janet Wilson, President of the Americana Centre Condominium Board of Directors, filed the Evaluation of Significance application requesting designation of the Americana Centre property. Upon receiving an application, an Evaluation of Significance of the property for compliance with the HDC’s adopted criteria for historic designation is then conducted by staff, whose recommendation is forwarded to the HDC for consideration at a public meeting. The HDC evaluates only the historic significance of the Page 4 MAP2017-00115 February 1, 2017 property based on criteria adopted by the HDC and in use since 1974 (Exhibit 1). The criteria are based on those used for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. When the HDC finds that a site meets the criteria for designation, it may authorize the filing of a Sectional Map Amendment to add the overlay HD zone to the property, thereby initiating the public hearing and review process. The State of Maryland’s Land Use Article directs jurisdictions to follow their zoning process to accomplish historic designation. Therefore, the Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the proposed map amendment to the Mayor and Council, per Sec. 25.06.01.g. For the HD Overlay Zone, the Planning Commission considers the proposal in light of all applicable master plans and conformance with each, and the purpose of the HD Zone. If the Mayor and Council designate a property and approve the addition of the HD overlay zone, the HDC is authorized to review and approve, or disapprove, exterior changes proposed by the property owner. North high-rise (Hamilton House) with garden Three-story garden building with rooftop skylight buildings and plaza in front and arcade Two-story townhouses arranged in a semi-circular pattern at the southeast portion of the site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service
    GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 1996 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 I. THE MOUNT VERNON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • • • 7 II. THE CAPPER-CRAMTON ACT 21 III. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1931-1952 • 33 IV. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1952-1970 57 V. THE UNFINISHED PARKWAY. 87 VI. ARLINGTON HOUSE .•• . • 117 VII. THEODORE ROOSEVELT ISLAND . • 133 VIII. OTHER ADDITIONS AND SUBTRACTIONS • . • • . 147 Fort Hunt •.. • • . • • . • • . 147 Jones Point . • • . • • . • . • • . • • . • • • . 150 Dyke Marsh and Daingerfield Island . • • • . • • . • 153 Arlington Memorial Bridge, Memorial Drive, and Columbia Island • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . • 164 The Nevius Tract • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • 176 Merrywood and the Riverfront Above Chain Bridge • • • . 184 Fort Marcy . • • • • . • • • • . • • . • • • . 187 The Langley Tract and Turkey Run Farm • • • • . • • • 188 Glen Echo Park and Clara Barton National Historic site • 190 GWMP Loses Ground • • • . • • • • .. • . • • . • • • 197 INTRODUCTION The George Washington Memorial Parkway is among the most complex and unusual units of the national park system. The GWMP encompasses some 7,428 acres in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. For reasons that will later be explained, a small part of this acreage is not administered by its superintendent, and a greater amount of land formerly within GWMP now lies within another national park unit. Some of the GWMP acreage the superintendent administers is commonly known by other names, like Great Falls Park in Virginia and Glen Echo Park in Maryland. While most national park units may be characterized as predominantly natural, historical, or recreational, GWMP comprises such a diverse array of natural, historic, and recreational resources that it defies any such categorization. Further complicating matters, GWMP's superintendent also administers four other areas classed as discrete national park units-Arlington House, The Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • HON. ALBERT C. RITCHIE Governor -3-^3-/6" '' C ^ O 1 N J U
    HON. ALBERT C. RITCHIE Governor -3-^3-/6" '' c ^ o 1 n J U MARYLAND MANUAL l 925 A Compendium of Legal, Historical and Statistical Information Relating to the STATE OF MARYLAND Compiled by E. BROOKE LEE, Secretary of State. 20TH CENTURY PRINTING CO. BALTIMORE. MD. State Government, 1925 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT State House, Annapolis. Baltimore Office 603 Union Trust Building. (iovernor: Albert C. Ritchie Baltimore City Secretary of State: E. Brooke Lee Silver Spring Executive Secretary: Kenneth M. Burns. .Baltimore Stenographers: Miss Virginia Dinwiddie Ellinger ; Baltimore Mrs. Bettie Smith ...Baltimore Clerks: Murray G. Hooper Annapolis Raymond M. Lauer. — Annapolis Chas. Burton Woolley .Annapolis The Governor is elected by the people for a term of four years from the second Wednesday in January ensuing his election (Constitu- tion, Art. 2, Sec. 2) ;* The Secretary of State is appointed by the Gov- ernor, with the consent of the Senate, to hold office during the term of the Governor; all other officers are appointed by the Governor to hold office during his pleasure Under the State Reorganization Law, which became operative Janu- ary 1, 1923, the Executive Department was reorganized and enlarged to include, besides the Secretary of State, the following: Parole Commis- sioner, The Commissioner of the Land Office, The Superintendent of Pub- lic Buildings, The Department of Legislative Reference, The Commis- sioners for Uniform State Laws, The State Librarian. The Secretary of State, in addition to his statutory duties, is the General Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • LIBRETTO ♫ August 2015 Symphony Village's Newsletter Vol
    photo by George Drake LIBRETTO ♫ August 2015 Symphony Village's Newsletter Vol. X, No. 8 MISSION STATEMENT: To enhance the quality of life and promote a harmonious community through the timely publication of accurate information about residents, events, and activities in and around Symphony Village Janet Berberich Tom and Grettchen Burton Bob and Candi Nilsson Christopher Berberich 211 Overture Way 414 Harmony Way 151 Orchestra Place COMMITTEE REPORTS LIFESTYLE –Vinny Volpicelli, Chairman; Carolyn Harty & Margo Wagner, Co-Vice Chairs; Pat Fox, Correspondent Jimmy Buffet Happy Hour – Saturday, August 15, at 6 p.m. Hawaiian shirts, margaritas, and DJ Randy Officer rocking the tunes! Bring an appetizer or dessert. Trivial Pursuit – Sunday, August 30, 2−5 p.m. Come out for some brain-stimulating, group fun! Happy Hour – Friday, September 4, at 6 p.m. Labor Day Picnic – Sunday, September 6, 2−6 p.m. Food from 3−6 p.m. Lunch Bunch – Thursday, September 10, at 12:30 p.m. (See article on page 9.) Next Lifestyle Committee Meeting – Monday, September 14, at 7 p.m. We normally meet on the first Monday of every month and welcome new members at any time; however, our September meeting date was changed due to the Labor Day holiday. SV Fall Yard Sale – Saturday, September 26, 8 a.m.− noon. The registration fee is $5 which will put you on the list of participating households, cover advertising costs, and provide a balloon for easy identification! Watch for the sign-up sheet in the near future. 1 Labor Day Picnic The Labor Day Picnic planning is well underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Blair Lee, IV: Why I'm Voting for Larry Hogan
    Letter from Blair Lee, IV: Why I'm voting for Larry Hogan Posted by Dick Myers On 11/03/2014 Here’s why I’m voting for Larry Hogan for governor. I don’t believe that the biggest problem facing Maryland is gun control or abortion. The biggest problem facing Maryland, and its next governor, is Maryland’s stagnant economy. Our economy is inextricably dependent upon federal government spending. For the past century Maryland has benefitted from its proximity to the nation’s capital. We’re the home of federal employees, federal defense bases, federal agencies, federal contractors, and all the industries and businesses that thrive on the federal presence. But, thanks to the 2010 elections, that economic engine has come to a standstill. The decline of federal employment and federal spending has stalled Maryland’s economy, which will remain stalled for the next eight years. Here’s why. The 2010 national elections gave rise to the Tea Party backlash against Obamacare, the Wall Street bailouts, the federal stimulus and the national debt. The big news was the Republican takeover of Congress. But equally important, yet underreported, were the state elections where the GOP added eight governorships, 675 legislative seats and gained full control of 25 state governments (Dems controlled only 16). As a result, congressional redistricting following the 2010 census favored Republicans. So, until 2022, (the next congressional redistricting) look for a Congress controlled by anti-tax, anti-spending Republicans firmly entrenched in “safe seats” thanks to GOP gerrymandering. Maryland’s Democrats and media like to pretend that our state weathered the great recession by heroically reducing spending and by “making tough choices.” But that’s not what happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnificent Failure Revisited: Modern Maryland Constitutional Law from 1967 to 1998 Dan Friedman
    Maryland Law Review Volume 58 | Issue 2 Article 6 Magnificent Failure Revisited: Modern Maryland Constitutional Law from 1967 to 1998 Dan Friedman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Dan Friedman, Magnificent Failure Revisited: Modern Maryland Constitutional Law from 1967 to 1998, 58 Md. L. Rev. 528 (1999) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol58/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAGNIFICENT FAILURE REVISITED: MODERN MARYLAND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FROM 1967 TO 1998 DAN FRIEDMAN* I. MAGNIFICENT FAILURE ..................................... 529 II. THE PATH TO THE CONVENTION .......................... 530 III. WHY THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION WAS REJECTED ....... 534 IV. MAGNIFICENT FAILURE REVISITED ........................... 540 A. Declarationof Rights ................................. 542 B. Elective Franchise..................................... 546 C. Legislative Branch .................................... 549 D. Executive Branch ..................................... 560 E. Judicial Branch ...................................... 571 F Local Government .................................... 578 G. Finance and Taxation ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Spiro Agnew and the Golden Age of Corruption in Maryland Politics: an Interview with Ben Bradlee and Richard Cohen of the Washington Post
    Spiro Agnew and the Golden Age of Corruption in Maryland Politics: An Interview with Ben Bradlee and Richard Cohen of The Washington Post Edited by Charles J. Holden and Zach Messitte The Occasional Papers of The Center for the Study of Democracy Volume 2, Number 1, Fall 2006 The Center for the Study of Democracy: A Better Understanding of Maryland and the World There have been forty-three Presidents and forty-six Vice Presidents of the United States. Spiro Agnew is the only Marylander ever elected to either national office. Born to a Greek immigrant father in Baltimore in 1918, Agnew attended Johns Hopkins University and the University of Baltimore Law School. He served in the U.S. Army in Europe during World War II and was awarded the Bronze Star. Agnew served as Baltimore County Executive from 1962-1966 and as Governor of Maryland from 1967- 1969. He stepped down as Governor to serve as Richard Nixon’s Vice President from 1969-1973. In 1973, he resigned the vice presidency and pled no contest to charges of tax evasion. After his resignation he wrote a novel, pursued a career as an international businessman, and maintained a beach house in Ocean City, Maryland where he died in 1996. Despite Agnew’s fascinating political career, no one has yet written a definitive biography about Maryland’s only vice-president. Richard Cohen, a syndicated columnist for The Washington Post, covered Annapolis for the newspaper in the early 1970s and broke many of the stories in the fall of 1973 that chronicled Agnew’s legal travails.
    [Show full text]
  • Both Matawan Sides Talk to No Avail by BOB BRAN I
    V You pay your money and you take your choice Almanac sees bitter winter; government says fmild' DUBLIN, N.H. (AP) - Abe Weatherwise, whose fore- "The odds are about Ml against a recurrence ol the tf tke eaaalry, a wet spring lor tke Sulk, Irosts lor cut of Western drought and Eastern blizzards were dead extreme weather we had last winter," according to Na- rtortda la December, a cool Jaae lor tke Great Plalas Tlw bright? side accurate lor 1177, predict* a hard winter for the North- tional Weather Service lorecaster Joe Harrison. But he aad a warmer Ikaa average wlater for tke Far West. NEW YORK (AP) - Mild weather and sufficient sup- tut and occasional spells ol cold, much snow and a late predicted a colder-than-normal winter lor the Northeast Judson Hale, editor ol the venerable collection ol plies of residential heating fuels are predicted for the wring lor the rest ol the nation in the coming year. and Midwest and a mllder-than-normal winter for the coming winter. But federal officials warn that it is only a Tlw 116th edition ol the Old Farmer's Almanac, re Southwest. trivia, planting tables, animal gestation charts, zodiac se- crets and 16 regional weather forecasts, says he does not temporary respite from the chilly effects of the energy The almanac's forecast for the Northeast: "Almost crisis. continuous subnormal temperatures and frequent snows think the almanac has been merely lucky with its weath- Even the flu'» due, page 2 er forecasts Natural gas shortages, which closed hundreds of fac- tories and schools last winter, helped persuade many I yesterday, also says drought in the Great Plains "If you consider weather haphazard, there is no point business leaders and homeowners — especially in the will continue but will be somewhat alleviated in the Far in going any further There is a great order to the uni- Midwest — to improve insulation, insitute other con- Weat by rain In November and January verse and it does not make sense that any part ol it servation measures or seek alternate fuel sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Manual Supplement 1975-1976 199
    MARYLAND MANUAL SUPPLEMENT 1975-1976 ■ - ' ' ^-3-/3-^] 992232 MARYLAND MANUAL yf: N o i\ SUPPLEMENT 1975-1976 Compiled By EDWARD C. PAPENFUSE State Archivist and FRANK F. WHITE, JR. Editor Issued By FRED L. WINELAND Secretary of State Annapolis, Maryland Distributed and Sold By Department of General Services Hall of Records Commission Annapolis, Maryland The John D. Lucas Printing Company 2601 Sisson Street Baltimore, Md. 21211 Copyright 1975 By The Hall of Records Commission of the State of Maryland FOREWORD The MARYLAND MANUAL SUPPLEMENT for 1975-1976, is an updated and abbreviated version of the 1973-1974 MARYLAND MANUAL. It contains an overview of State and local Government reflecting organizational and personnel changes that have occurred since the spring of 1974. With its name and general index and tele- phone numbers, including those for members of the General Assembly, it should prove an invaluable reference tool. However, it should be used in conjunction with the current MARYLAND MANUAL, be- cause it does not contain agency descriptions, certain election returns, historical data, or relevant documents such as Maryland’s Charter and the State Constitution, all of which are to be found in the 1973- 1974 MANUAL. As is the case with the full MARYLAND MANUAL, this SUP- PLEMENT could not have been compiled without the cooperation of many individuals and agencies, and to them we are greatly in- debted. Although it is not practical to mention each by name we are especially grateful to the Honorable George R. Lewis, Secretary of the Department of General Services, of which we are a part, for his constant support and encouragement of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • March 19, 2015 7:00 P.M. Miller Senate Office Building Conference Room East Annapolis, Maryland
    March 19, 2015 7:00 p.m. Miller Senate Office Building Conference Room East Annapolis, Maryland Sponsored by the Maryland Commission for Women Women Legislators of Maryland, and the Maryland Department of Human Resources Table of Contents Maryland Commission for Women ................................................... 2 Induction Ceremony .......................................................................... 3 Maryland Women’s Hall of Fame Honorees ..................................... 4 Women Legislators of the Maryland General Assembly, Inc............ 6 2015 Maryland Women’s Hall of Fame ............................................. 7 Maryland Women’s Hall of Fame Biographies ............................... 10 Maryland Commission for Women 51 Monroe Street, Suite 1034 l Rockville, MD 20850 l 301-610-4523 www.marylandwomen.org In 1965, the Maryland Commission for Women was first established and was set 2015 in state law in 1971. An office within the Department of Human Resources, the Maryland Women’s Hall of Fame Commission is a 25-member advisory board whose duties outlined in its enabling legislation include: study the status of women in our state, recommend methods of Induction Ceremony overcoming discrimination, recognize women’s accomplishments and contributions, and provide informed advice to the executive and legislative branches of government on the issues concerning the women of our state. Commissioners are appointed to Honorees four-year terms by the Governor, with confirmation by the Maryland State Senate, Beverly B.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Legal History
    Volume XLIX • Number 6 November/December 2016 Maryland Legal History November 2016 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 1 2 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL November 2016 Volume XLIX • Number 6 November/December 2016 16 34 4 46 Published bimonthly by the Maryland State Bar Association, Inc. The Maryland Bar Center “Maryland Legal History” 520 W. Fayette St. Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Telephone: (410) 685-7878 (800) 492-1964 Website: www.msba.org Features Executive Director: Paul V. Carlin 4 Eugenics, Jim Crow & Baltimore’s Best Editor: W. Patrick Tandy Assistant to the Editor: Lisa Muscara By Garrett Power Design: Jason Quick Advertising Sales: Network Media Partners Subscriptions: MSBA members receive 16 A Look Back: University of Maryland BALSA, 1976-1979 THE MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL as $20 of their dues payment goes to By Harry S. Johnson publication. Others, $42 per year. POSTMASTER: Send address change to THE MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 22 Psychologists As Expert Witnesses: A Legal Retrospective 520 W. Fayette St. Baltimore, MD 21201 By Kenneth A. Vogel The Maryland Bar Journal welcomes articles on topics of interest to Maryland 28 People’s Progress: Looking Backward and Forward attorneys. All manuscripts must be original work, submitted for approval by the After 20 Years Special Committee on Editorial Advisory, and must conform to the Journal style By Dave Pantzer guidelines, which are available from the MSBA headquarters. The Special 34 Integration in a Post-Brown World: A Conversation with Committee reserves the right to reject any manuscript submitted for publication. Judge Marcella Holland Advertising: Advertising rates will be furnished upon request. All advertising By Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Stadium Funding and Urban Redevelopment in Baltimore, Maryland
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: EDIFICE COMPLEX: PUBLIC STADIUM FUNDING AND URBAN REDEVELOPMENT IN BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Ian Charles Bucacink, Master of Arts, 2018 Thesis Directed By: Associate Professor David M. P. Freund, Department of History. In the 1980s, Marylanders engaged in a public debate over the need to replace Baltimore’s Memorial Stadium. New stadium proponents, led by an elite coalition of politicians, businesspeople, and the newspapers, argued that Baltimore needed professional sports teams economically, as well as for the positive image they bestowed upon the city. Only a new publically-funded stadium would prevent the baseball Orioles from following the football Colts out of town, these supporters contented. A large segment of the public questioned the need to replace Memorial Stadium and suggested alternative social priorities for state funding, but the state legislature decided to fund the new stadium complex at Camden Yards anyway, despite intense popular opposition. For Baltimore’s elites, the issue was about more than sports. The new stadiums were a defense and continuation of the city’s neoliberal policies of urban redevelopment, along with all that those policies entailed, both good and bad. EDIFICE COMPLEX: PUBLIC STADIUM FUNDING AND URBAN REDEVELOPMENT IN BALTIMORE, MARYLAND by Ian Charles Bucacink Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2018 Advisory Committee: Professor David Freund, Chair Professor David Sicilia Professor Colleen Woods © Copyright by Ian C. Bucacink 2018 Preface This paper has its origins as far back as the Fall 2010 semester, when, as a sophomore undergraduate, I enrolled in the University of Maryland’s history research and methods class.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 147 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2001 No. 1 Senate The third day of January being the Jesus Christ, You are our Lord and The writer Thomas Wolfe said that day prescribed by House Concurrent Saviour. Amen. America is a place where miracles not Resolution 446 for the meeting of the f only happen, they happen all the time. 1st session of the 107th Congress, the Today we are experiencing one of those Senate assembled in its Chamber at the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE miracles: The peaceful transition of Capitol at 12:01 p.m. The Honorable HARRY REID, a Sen- power from one Congress to the other. ator from the State of Nevada, led the Some people say it will take another PRAYER Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: miracle for this Congress and adminis- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the tration to find a way to work together. Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: United States of America, and to the Repub- As we begin this historic Congress, let Let us pray: lic for which it stands, one nation under God, us resolve that we will work in good Almighty God, Your glory fills this indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. faith with each other to do the people’s hallowed Senate Chamber. We exalt f business. That is our pledge from this You as Sovereign of our beloved Na- side of the aisle.
    [Show full text]