DOCSLIB.ORG

SEAT in Syktyvkar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEAT in Syktyvkar www.mondigroup.com Mondi Europe and International Division Syktyvkar Logging Operations SEAT Report 2015 Socio-economic assessment toolbox report Contents 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction 2 3 Assessment objectives and methodology 4 3.1 Assessment objectives 4 3.2 Methodology and process 4 3.3 SEAT team 4 3.4 Key stakeholders 4 3.5 Acknowledgements 5 4 Overview of surroundings 6 4.1 The Komi Republic 7 4.2 Logging areas 8 5 About Mondi Syktyvkar 9 5.1 Production 9 5.2 Financial performance 10 5.3 Wood procurement 11 5.3.1 Structure of Logging Operations 11 5.3.2 Wood supply chain 11 5.4 Forestry and environmental practices and developing forest capital 14 5.4.1 Road and bridge construction 14 5.4.2 Silviculture and intensive forestry 15 5.4.3 Engagement with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) 16 5.4.4 High conservation value forests 17 5.4.5 Biodiversity and natural forest dynamics 17 5.4.6 Water management 18 5.4.7 Waste and emissions management 19 5.5 Social management systems and performance 19 5.5.1 Employment 19 5.5.2 Business relations 19 5.5.3 Social and economic partnership programmes 20 5.5.4 Working with stakeholders 20 5.5.5 Safety 21 5.5.6 Social benefits for employees 21 5.5.7 Training programmes 22 6 Results of the assessment 23 6.1 General observations 23 6.2 Positive findings 23 6.3 Identified challenges and stakeholders’ further comments and 25 expectations Social concerns 25 Performance 27 Employment and labour 28 Suppliers and contractors 30 Contact details OBC SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT TOOLBOX REPORT 1 Executive summary • Mondi SYK is considered by both local and regional authorities Mondi Syktyvkar JSC in Russia has as a responsible partner and good tax and forest rent payer; completed its fifth SEAT (socio-economic • Suppliers and contractors describe Mondi as a reliable partner, acknowledging recent positive changes in planning assessment toolbox) review in 2015, and this and tender management; report – available in English and Russian – • Corporate social investment initiatives and cooperation reflects the comments made by stakeholders with NGOs and education institutions are well-known and highly-supported; during the SEAT sessions and the responses • Modernisation of forestry operations and improved working provided by Mondi SYK management. conditions for logging camp employees are acknowledged; • The FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) certification process Socio-economic and environmental conditions form an important is well-known and supported by all stakeholders; and backdrop to the contribution by Mondi Syktyvkar JSC (Mondi SYK • Mondi SYK’s environmental responsibility as well as its or the company) to the sustainable development of a region. Our improved reforestation and silviculture are highly appreciated. formal and fully-transparent assessments of the impacts of our industrial activities on the socio-economic environments of host Challenges identified by stakeholders: communities and regions are carried out on a regular basis. This • Concerns over infrastructure issues: deterioration of roads process, known as SEAT (socio-economic assessment toolbox), and closing down of rafting are among the main concerns is a series of open and transparent sessions of dialogue with our raised by stakeholders; stakeholders and is facilitated by an independent third party. • Unemployment concerns in logging areas; • Lack of transparency in the use of social investment funds by The main goal of the SEAT process is to obtain a thorough local administrations, and in some areas, an insufficient amount understanding of how our stakeholders perceive the company, of social investment; what changes and trends have occurred since previous SEATs, • A gap between Mondi's high operational standards and and what are the positive and negative impacts of our operations the equipment and practices used by contractors for soil on the surrounding communities and stakeholders. This SEAT, preparation, logging, transportation and silviculture; driving conducted during October 2015, focused on the Logging through villages by contractors (instead of by-passes); and, Operations of Mondi SYK. in many cases, the use of overloaded vehicles; • Impact on soils during harvesting was identified as one of the The SEAT assessment team for Mondi SYK included Mondi main environmental concerns; SYK Logging Operations, Mondi Group and third-party • Reward systems and social benefits for Logging Operations representatives. Key stakeholders that attended SEAT sessions and the Mill are seen to be different, e.g. a lack of a included employees of Mondi SYK Logging Operations, performance-related wage incentive system for supporting/ contractors, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) non-operations staff at logging areas; representatives, municipality and state authorities, community • Retrenchment of some employees in Logging Operations and members, media representatives and customers. the associated increase in workload and responsibilities; and • Suppliers and contractors are concerned about just-in-time Some of the findings of the SEAT process included: logistics which involve very strict and narrow time slots for wood delivery and acceptance at the Mill gate. In many Positive aspects commented on by stakeholders: cases, it is accompanied by inefficiencies in the offloading • Mondi SYK is considered a reliable employer providing organisation at the Mondi SYK site. employment with regular and officially paid salaries; • Mondi SYK is appreciated for genuine attention to health and Mondi SYK management has provided feedback and responses safety requirements; to all issues raised by stakeholders in this report. This report will • Transparent communication and the open door policy of be distributed to all stakeholders, and the findings will be used to Mondi SYK is recognised and appreciated by all stakeholders review and develop an annual community engagement plan that on all levels; aligns the needs of the business and priorities of the community. SYKTYVKAR LOGGING OPERATIONS SEAT REPORT 2015 1 2 Introduction Mondi Group (Mondi) recognises that there is a broad range of The results of the assessment are published in a report and stakeholders who have an interest in Mondi and its activities, and distributed to stakeholders. on whom its operations and products have an impact. Mondi Mondi’s commitment to conducting SEAT studies at its forestry engages actively with its stakeholders – shareholders, customers, operations and pulp and paper mills is reflected in its policies and employees, suppliers, governments, NGOs, academic institutions, standards on corporate citizenship which support Mondi’s overall local communities, certification bodies, regulators and media – to policy on sustainable development. understand and respond to their concerns. Mondi Group does this at a global, national and operational level. Mondi Group’s approach This report reflects the major changes in, and accomplishments and includes both informal and formal multi-stakeholder dialogue; it challenges of logging activities since the previous assessment in seeks to engage and report regularly and transparently. 2009; the issues raised by stakeholders during the SEAT sessions; and the responses provided by Mondi SYK management. Socio-economic and environmental conditions form an important backdrop to Mondi SYK’s contribution to the sustainable We make available electronic versions of the report on the development of a region. Mondi SYK’s formal and fully-transparent Mondi Group website in English and Russian. A printed version assessments of the impacts of its industrial activities on the of the public report is also available. In order to reach as many socio-economic environment of host communities and regions stakeholders as possible, the printed report has been made are carried out on a regular basis. This process, known as SEAT, available in public places and has also been distributed by mail. is a series of open and transparent sessions of dialogue with Information on the dissemination of the public report has been our stakeholders and is facilitated by an independent third party. shared with the community via regional and local media. SECTION 3 SECTION 4 Assessment objectives and methodology Overview of surroundings Introduces SEAT, our socio-economic assessment tool, and Provides a brief overview of the region and districts where Mondi’s reflects on our objectives in conducting such assessments logging areas are located, including selected key economic and in communities where we operate. It also describes our demographic statistics, and maps. methodology in conducting SEATs and provides details on the SEAT team and key stakeholders invited. SECTION 5 SECTION 6 About Mondi Syktyvkar Results of the assessment Describes the company’s standards and practices and Includes the SEAT team’s findings on the issues raised and provides data on production; financial performance; wood commented on by stakeholders during the SEAT sessions. procurement; forestry and environment; and social management The section is split into general observations (overall impressions systems and performance. about the process), positive findings (areas stakeholders were pleased about) and challenges identified (areas stakeholders were concerned about). Individual findings are categorised into groups of broader issues, for example social concerns, performance, employment and labour. Management feedback and response have been provided separately for each individual finding. 2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strengthening Protected Area System of the Komi Republic to Conserve Virgin Forest Biodiversity in the Pechora Headwaters Region
    Strengthening Protected Area System of the Komi Republic to Conserve Virgin Forest Biodiversity in the Pechora Headwaters Region PIMS 2496, Atlas Award 00048772, Atlas Project No: 00059042 Terminal Evaluation, Volume I November 2014 Russian Federation GEF SO1: Catalysing the Sustainability of Protected Areas SP3: Strengthened National Terrestrial Protected Area Networks Russian Federation, Ministry of Natural Resources Komi Republic, Ministry of Natural Resources United National Development Program Stuart Williams KOMI REPUBLIC PAS PROJECT - TE Acknowledgements The mission to the Komi Republic was well organised and smoothly executed. For this, I would like to thank everyone involved starting with Irina Bredneva and Elena Bazhenova of the UNDP-CO for making all the travel arrangements so smooth and easy, and making me welcome in Moscow. In the Komi Republic, the project team ensured that I met the right stakeholders, showed me the results of the project efforts in remote and beautiful areas of the republic, and accompanying me. Special thanks are due to Alexander Popov (the National Project Director) and Vasily Ponomarev (the Project Manager) for the connections, arrangements, for accompanying me and for many fruitful discussions. Other team members who accompanied the mission included Svetlana Zagirova, Andrei Melnichuk and Anastasiya Tentyukova. I am also grateful to all the other stakeholders who gave freely of their time and answered my questions patiently (please see Annex III for a list of all the people met over the course of the mission to the Komi Republic). I am also particularly grateful for the tireless efforts of Alexander Oshis, my interpreter over the course of the mission even when he was not well, for the clear and accurate interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Komi Aluminium Programme [EBRD
    Komi Aluminium Komi Aluminium Programme PROPOSED EARLY WORKS PROGRAMME FOR THE PROPOSED SOSNOGORSK REFINERY SITE Environmental Analysis IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Prepared By: CSIR ENVIRONMENTEK P.O. Box 395 Pretoria 0001 Contact Person: Rob Hounsome Tel: +27 31 242-2300 Fax: +27 31 261-2509 Email: [email protected] In Partnership with: DewPoint International (Colorado) DATE: April 2004 Final Table of Contents 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................- 3 - 2 Scope of the Early Works..............................................................................................................- 3 - 3 Impacts associated with the Early Works...................................................................................- 4 - 4 Background......................................................................................................................................- 5 - 4.1 The developer...............................................................................................................................- 6 - 4.2 Environmental and social assessment studies...........................................................................- 6 - 5 The Proposed Site...........................................................................................................................- 7 - 5.1 Location........................................................................................................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Stratigraphy of the Devonian Domanik Formation, Timan-Pechora Basin, by Michele L
    uses science for a changing world Molecular Stratigraphy of the Devonian Domanik Formation, Timan-Pechora Basin, by Michele L. W. Tuttle, 1 Paul G. Lillis, 1 and Jerry L. Clayton1 Open-File Report 99-379 1999 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 'Denver, Colorado Table of Contents Page Introduction .............................................. 1 Methods ................................................... 3 The Geochemistry of Domanik Source Rocks .................. 7 Lithology and Mineralogy ............................. 7 Organic Geochemistry ................................. 7 Trace Metal Geochemistry ............................ 17 Sulfur Geochemistry ................................. 23 Paleoenvironmental Conditions during Deposition of the Domanik Formation ...................................... 24 References ............................................... 24 List of Tables Page Table 1. Selected trace element concentrations and V/(V+Ni) ratios in a variety of shales and sediments ........................................... 21 List of Figures Page Figure 1. Index map of Russia and map of Timan-Pechora basin showing study location inside square around the town of Ukhta. Modified from Ulmeshek (1982) ....2 Figure 2. Domanik Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom-Annual-Report-2010-En.Pdf
    ОАО GAZPROM ANNUAL REPORT 2010 ОАО GAZPROM ANNUAL REPORT 2010 OAO GAZPROM’S MISSION OAO Gazprom’s mission is to ensure a safe, efficient, and balanced supply of natural gas, other types of energy resources, and refined products to consumers. OAO GAZPROM’S STRATEGIC GOAL OAO Gazprom’s strategic goal is to establish itself as a leader among global energy companies by entering new markets, diversifying its activities, and ensuring reliable supplies. PRINCIPLES OF OAO GAZPROM’S OPERATIONS raising the efficiency of operations; diversifying through high-performance projects to create products with high added value; increasing capitalization and credit ratings; meeting the interests of all OAO Gazprom shareholders; improving corporate governance; improving the transparency of financial and business activities; establishing personal responsibility in its leadership for managerial decision-making; minimizing specific adverse environmental impact from technological causes. 2 ОАО GAZPROM ANNUAL REPORT 2010 GAZPROM IS ONE OF THE WORLD’S LARGEST ENERGY COMPANIES GAZPROM GROUP ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA AND ABROAD IN 2010 FSU Countries Russia Japan Republic Venezuela of Korea European Contries Taiwan Bolivia China Vietnam Equatorial Algeria Libia Iraq India Guinea Hydrocarbons search and Gas transportation and Oil and gas condensate sales geological exploration underground storage Gas and gas condensate Electric power and heat Refined products sales production generation Oil production Spot sales of LNG Electricity sales Projects of methane Sales of gas, supplied
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 National Holidays As a Multiplier of Ethno-Tourism in the Komi Republic
    Community development 161 4.3 National holidays as a multiplier of ethno-tourism in the Komi Republic Galina Gabucheva This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/5.3210 Introduction The Komi Republic has a vast territory, and a rich historical and cultural heritage. There is untouched wildness in most regions, which is a prerequisite for the development of various forms of tourism. A relatively new, but actively developing, sphere of tourism industry in the republic is ethnic tourism linked to the lifestyle and traditions of the Komi people. People increasingly want not just to travel in comfort, but also through a special experience where they learn and try something new. How did our ancestors live without electricity? How did they stoke the stove and light up the house? What tools and objects did they use in everyday life? How did they cultivate crops, hunt, and fish? How did they conduct holidays and feasts, what did they drink and eat, how did they sing and dance? Due to the geographic isolation of the Komi Republic, this Northern European ethnic culture is preserved in the form of traditions and customs, ideas about the world and beliefs, used instruments of labour, clothing and housing, monuments of antiquity, and legends and epic tales. This certainly provides a good basis for the development of ethno-cultural tourism in our region. Ethno-tourism in Komi Today, a number of ethno-tourism projects have been developed by some travel agencies within the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT STATEMENT of INDIGENOUS SOLIDARITY for ARCTIC PROTECTION
    JOINT STATEMENT of INDIGENOUS SOLIDARITY for ARCTIC PROTECTION We the Peoples of the North have for too long experienced the oppression of our Peoples and the barbaric destruction of our land. It is time that we join forces and demand that the oil companies and the Arctic States change their path and start to listen to the voices of the Indigenous Peoples residing in these lands. The Peoples of the North will no longer be bought with dimes and cents to stand silently by while the oil companies destroy our native land. Our culture and history cannot be bought off and replaced with pipelines and drill rigs. Our way of living defines who we are and we will stand up and fight for our nature and environment. Too many have been reduced to depend on the generosity of the oil companies. Our rights and ability to sustain ourselves must not be trampled by others’ endless hunger for profits. Our lands and culture must be preserved for the generations to come. If divided, we will not be able to withstand the pressure from oil producing companies to open up our homes for destruction. Today we gather our forces and refuse to continue to stand silently by, witnessing the destruction of our land. We stand together in our call for: • A ban on all offshore oil drilling in the Arctic shelf. We cannot accept the ecological risks and destructive impacts of a spill on our lands and in our seas. The irresponsible practices of oil companies everywhere have provided us with more than enough evidence that oil spills in the Arctic seas will be inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle-Timan Bauxite Mining & Processing Project
    Komi Aluminium Komi Aluminium Programme Executive Summary of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE MIDDLE TIMAN BAUXITE MINE FROM 2.5 MTPA TO 6 MTPA AND EARLY WORKS AT THE SOSNOGORSK REFINERY SITE Prepared By: CSIR ENVIRONMENTEK P.O. Box 395 Pretoria 0001 Contact Person: Rob Hounsome Tel: +27 31 242-2300 Fax: +27 31 261-2509 Email: [email protected] In Partnership with: Ecoline EIA Center (Moscow) DewPoint International (Colorado) Komi Institute of Biology (Syktyvkar) Date: April 2004 Final TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.............................................................................................1 2. OPERATIONAL CONTEXT .........................................................................................................1 2.1 Proposed expansion of the Middle Timan Bauxite Mine (MTBM)............................................................ 1 2.2 Proposed Sosnogorsk Alumina Refinery................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Next steps of the Komi Aluminium Programme....................................................................................... 2 2.4 Project investment................................................................................................................................... 2 2.5 Russian legal and institutional framework ............................................................................................... 2 2.6 EBRD and IFC/WBG Environmental Assessment Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy New Martyrs of Northern and Western Russia, Belorussia and the Baltic Introduction
    THE HOLY NEW MARTYRS OF NORTHERN AND WESTERN RUSSIA, BELORUSSIA AND THE BALTIC INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................3 1. HIEROMARTYR BARSANUPHIUS, BISHOP OF KIRILLOV ................................................5 2. HIEROMARTYR NICON, ARCHBISHOP OF VOLOGDA ....................................................9 3. HIEROMARTYR PLATO, BISHOP OF REVEL (TALLINN).................................................11 4. HIEROMARTYR EUGENE, BISHOP OF OLONETS .............................................................16 5. HIEROMARTYR BENJAMIN, METROPOLITAN OF PETROGRAD .................................17 6. HIEROMARTYR BARNABAS, ARCHBISHOP OF ARCHANGELSK ................................31 7. HIEROMARTYR JOSEPH, BISHOP OF VALDAI ..................................................................32 8. HIEROMARTYR HIEROTHEUS, BISHOP OF VELIKY USTIUG ........................................33 9. HIEROCONFESSOR EUTHYMIUS, BISHOP OF OLONETS ...............................................53 10. HIEROCONFESSOR NICHOLAS, BISHOP OF VELSK ......................................................54 11. HIEROMARTYR ANTHONY, ARCHBISHOP OF ARCHANGELSK..............................55 12. HIEROCONFESSOR MACARIUS, BISHOP OF CHEREPOVETS .....................................61 13. HIEROCONFESSOR BARSANUPHIUS, BISHOP OF KARGOPOL ..................................63 14. HIEROMARTYR JOHN, ARCHBISHOP OF RIGA..............................................................65
    [Show full text]
  • Entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (By Topic Category)
    Entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (by topic category) The list is divided into the following six sections: A. 118 submitted articles (as of 20 April 2011) (p. 4) B. 169 entries for which we have contracted authors (p. 18) C. 67 entries for which we have suggested or invited (but not contracted) authors (p. 39) D. 55 entries for which we have no suggested authors (p. 51) E. 113 suggested entries that might be included if space allows (p. 57) F. 158 suggested entries that are not likely to be included (p. 67) Note: As of April 20, 2011, we have 409 entries/articles to be included in the Barents Encyclopedia! Thus, we do not need any more new entry suggestions unless this is required for reasons of “balance” or serious omissions! Column contents In column “S” the status of the entry word is indicated (for labels, see top of p. 4). In column “E” the suggested entry word is stated. In column “Enc” the a cronym for the encyclopedia where the entry was found (see listing below) or the name of the person suggesting the entry is listed. In column “T” the “topics category” to which the suggested entry belongs (see category codes 1–12 below); In column “T alt” an alternative topic classification is given. In column “L” the suggested Length of entry is stated. (For labels of the different types of entries identified, see table below!) In column “A” the name (and affiliation/email address) of the suggested author is listed. In column “C” you may enter comments about the suggested entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Working Plan for 2015
    Annual Working Plan for 2015 Director __________________ Yury Pautov Silver Taiga Foundation Annual Working Plan for 2015 General Contents: Primary activity 1. Contribution to establishment of Protected Areas on the basis of pristine forests (Yu. Pautov)…………………………………………………………. p. 2 2. Ecosystem and landscape background for forestry and FSC planning (N. Shuktomov, Yu.Pautov,)..…………………………………………….… p. 3 3. Model River Mezen – cooperation with local communities (V.Semyashkina, N. Shilov)………………………………………................ p. 4 4. Model River Mezen – restoration of fish resources (N. Shilov, N. Shuktomov)……………………………………..……………...…….….. p. 6 5. Evaluation of the long-term impact of forestry (logging) on water resource (Yu. Pautov)………………………………………………………………… p. 8 6. Consultations and training (Yu.Pautov)…………………………………………………………………. p. 9 Supplementary activity (in case additional financing is involved) 7. Regional Komi Model Forest Development program for 2013 – 2015 (Yu. Pautov)………………........................................................................ p. 10 8. Forest communities and use of natural resources. Interaction of forest communities and large forest business (V. Semyashkina)……..…............. p. 11 9. Initiation of volunteer movement (A.Mikheeva)……………………………………..….…..………..…..……...… p. 12 10. Support of FSC certification in Russia (Yu. Pautov)………………………………………………………………... p. 13 Approved by the Coordination Council of Silver Taiga Foundation: Coordination Council Chairman / Williams Jeremy Member of Coordination Council / Karpachevskiy Mikhail Member of Coordination Council / Majewski Przemyslaw Member of Coordination Council / Sedusova Natalia February 24, 2015 p. 1 out of 13 Annual Working Plan for 2015 Primary activity 1. Contribution to establishment of Protected Areas on the basis of pristine forests (Yu. Pautov). Objective for 2014-2016: To search and strength compromise solutions on conservation and sustainable use of pristine forests in priority regions of the Komi Republic and to spread positive experience in Arkhangelsk region.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Taiga Foundation Progress Report for 2012
    Annual Report 2012 Director __________________ Yury Pautov Silver Taiga Foundation Progress report for 2012 General Contents: Primary activity 1. High Conservation Value Forests. Contribution to establishment of Protected Areas on the basis of pristine forests (Y. Pautov)....…………………………………...........................р. 2 2. Ecosystem and landscape background for forestry planning and FSC certification. (Y. Pautov)...............................................................................................................................р. 6 3. Model river Mezen – cooperation with local communities (V. Semyashkina)………….р.10 4. Model river Mezen – restoration of fish resources (P. Majewski)………………....... ..p.16 5. Transfer of Komi Model Forest experience to the Baltic Region. International Model Forests Network (P. Majewski)…………………...…………..........................................р.23 6. Consultations and trainings (Е. Popova)………………..………..…..………….…...….p.26 Supplementary activity (in case additional financing is involved) 7. Forest communities and use of natural resources. Interaction of forest communities and large forest business (V. Semyashkina)………………………………………..….........p. 28 8. Model Forest as a neutral platform of forest policy debate (Y. Pautov) ……….…........p. 31 9. Initiation of a volunteer movement (Е. Popova)………………..…………………........p.33 10. Development of a regional risk assessment for FSC controlled wood in the Komi Republic (Е. Popova)…………………………………………..………………….........................p.35 Approved by the Coordination Council of
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2015
    Progress Report 2015 Director __________________ Yury Pautov Silver Taiga Foundation Progress report for 2015 General Contents: Primary activity 1. Contribution to establishment of Protected Areas on the basis of pristine forests (Yu. Pautov)…………………………………………………………. p. 2 2. Ecosystem and landscape background for forestry and FSC planning (Yu. Pautov, N. Shuktomov)……..…………………………………………….… p. 6 3. Model River Mezen – cooperation with local communities (V.Semyashkina, N. Shilov)…………………………………................ p. 9 4. Model River Mezen – restoration of fish resources (N. Shilov, N. Shuktomov)…..…………………………………………………...…….….. p. 15 5. Evaluation of the long-term impact of forestry (logging) on water resource (Yu. Pautov)………………………………………………………………… p. 20 6. Support of the “Boreal Forest Platform” of WWF Russia in the framework of Mondi-Group – WWF International alliance (Yu. Pautov)……………… p. 24 7. Consultations and training (Yu. Pautov)……………………..…..…...………………………………… p. 25 Supplementary activity (in case additional financing is involved) 8. Regional program of the Komi Model Forest development in the Komi Republic for 2013 – 2015. (Yu. Pautov)…..................................................... p.26 9. Forest communities and use of natural resources. Cooperation between forest communities and large forest business (V. Semyashkina)……............ p.27 10. Initiation of volunteer movement (A.Shuktomova)…………………………………………………………….. p.29 11. Support of the FSC certification in Russia (Yu. Pautov) …………………………………………………………...…… p.30 Approved by the Coordination
    [Show full text]