DOCSLIB.ORG

Accomack County, Virginia and Incorporated Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accomack County, Virginia and Incorporated Areas ACCOMACK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACCOMACK COUNTY, (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 510001 *ACCOMAC, TOWN OF 510050 BELLE HAVEN, TOWN OF 510242 *BLOXOM, TOWN OF 510256 CHINCOTEAGUE, TOWN OF 510002 *HALLWOOD, TOWN OF 510218 Accomack County *KELLER, TOWN OF 510277 *MELFA, TOWN OF 510012 ONANCOCK, TOWN OF 510298 *ONLEY, TOWN OF 510261 *PAINTER, TOWN OF 510285 *PARKSLEY, TOWN OF 510226 SAXIS, TOWN OF 510003 TANGIER, TOWN OF 510004 WACHAPREAGUE, TOWN OF 510005 *N o Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Revised: May 18, 2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 51001CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial countywide FIS Effective Date: March 16, 2009 Revised countywide FIS Date: May 18, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Study ....................................................................................................1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments...........................................................................1 1.3 Coordination...........................................................................................................4 2.0 AREA STUDIED ...............................................................................................................5 2.1 Scope of Study .......................................................................................................5 2.2 Community Description .........................................................................................5 2.3 Principal Flood Problems .......................................................................................6 2.4 Flood Protection Measures .................................................................................... 10 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS.......................................................................................... 10 3.1 Coastal Analyses ................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Vertical Datum ..................................................................................................... 27 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS ................................................... 28 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries .......................................................................................... 28 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION ………………………….................................................... 30 6.0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ............................................................................... 32 7.0 OTHER STUDIES ........................................................................................................... 32 8.0 LOCATION OF DATA ................................................................................................... 32 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ....................................................................... 34 i TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED Page FIGURES Figure 1 – Transect Location Map..................................................................................................... 26 Figure 2 – Typical Transect Schematic ………................................................................................. 30 TABLES Table 1 – CCO Meeting Dates for Pre-countywide FISs .................................................................. 4 Table 2 – Summary of Stillwater Elevations .............................................................................. 12 - 13 Table 3 – Transect Data ………................................................................................................... 16 - 25 Table 4 – Community Map History .................................................................................................... 33 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Flood Insurance Rate Map Index Flood Insurance Rate Map ii FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY ACCOMACK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Study This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) revises and supersedes the previous FIS report and/or Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) in the geographic area of Accomack County, Virginia, including the Towns of Accomac, Belle Haven, Bloxom, Chincoteague, Hallwood, Keller, Melfa, Onancock, Onley, Painter, Parksley, Saxis, Tangier, and Wachapreague and the unincorporated areas of Accomack County (hereinafter referred to collectively as Accomack County), and aids in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This study has developed flood-risk data for various areas of the community that will be used to establish actuarial flood insurance rates. This information will also be used by Accomack County to update existing floodplain regulations as part of the regular phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and by local and regional planners to further promote sound land use and floodplain management. Minimum flood plain management requirements for participation in the NFIP are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. Please note that on the effective date of this study, the Towns of Accomac, Bloxom, Hallwood, Keller, Melfa, Onley, Painter, and Parksley have no identified Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). This does not preclude future determinations of SFHAs that could be necessitated by changed conditions affecting the community (i.e. annexation of new lands) or the availability of new scientific or technical data about flood hazards. Please note that the Town of Belle Haven is geographically located in Accomack and Northampton Counties. The Town of Belle Haven is included in its entirety in this FIS report. In some states or communities, floodplain management criteria or regulations may exist that are more restrictive or comprehensive than the minimum federal requirements. In such cases, the more restrictive criteria take precedence and the state (or other jurisdictional agency) will be able to explain them. 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments The sources of authority for this FIS are the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. Information on the authority and acknowledgments for each jurisdiction with a pre- countywide printed FIS report included in this countywide FIS is shown below: Accomack County: The December 1, 1983, FIS (FIRM effective June 1, 1984) was prepared by the Norfolk District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), under Inter-Agency Agreement (IAA) No. IAA-H-9-79, Project No. 35 (Reference 1). The hydrologic analyses were prepared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS). The wave height analysis was prepared by Dewberry & Davis, for 1 FEMA, under Contract No. EMW-C-0543. That work was completed in January 1981. Individual FIRM panels were revised on May 1, 1985, April 2, 1992, October 16, 1996, and July 20, 1998. Town of Belle Haven: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the Town of Belle Haven June 15, 1981, FIS (FIRM effective December 15, 1981) were prepared by the USACE, for FEMA, under IAA No. IAA-H-9-79, Project No. 35. That work was completed in July 1980 (Reference 2). Town of Chincoteague: In the original study the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the Town of Chincoteague FIS effective March 1, 1977 were prepared by the USACE, for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, under IAA No. H-16-75, Project Order No. 16. That work was completed in September 1976. A FIS revision was prepared by Dewberry & Davis, for FEMA, under Contract No. EMW-C-0543. That work was completed in June 1982. The FIS and FIRM for that revision became effective on May 16, 1983. Another revision was also prepared by Dewberry & Davis, at the request of the community, in September 1983. The FIS and FIRM for that revision became effective on June 1, 1984 (Reference 3). Town of Hallwood: In the original FIS effective November 3, 1981 (FIRM effective May 3, 1982), the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for Messongo Creek were prepared by the USACE, for FEMA, under IAA No. H-9-79, Project Order No. 35. That work was completed in October 1980 (Reference 4). Under the Limited Map Maintenance Program (LMMP), it was determined from a restudy by the USACE that no SFHAs exist within the community. By letter, effective September 28, 2001, the effective FIRM was rescinded. Town of Onancock: The hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for the Town of Onan- cock June 15, 1981, FIS (FIRM effective December 15, 1981) were prepared by the USACE, for FEMA, under IAA No. IAA-H-9-79, Project No. 35. That work was completed in August 1980 (Reference 5). Town
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution
    Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution Jordan Dale and Gary Lackmann North Carolina State University Barrett Smith NOAA/National Weather Service Raleigh, North Carolina Motivation Observational Analysis Simulated Frontal Analysis • The distribution of precipitation associated with landfalling tropical 0600 UTC 1 September 0600 UTC 1 September cyclones remains a critical forecast problem and is dependent on several factors, including: . storm motion . intensity . areal extent . synoptic-scale forcing Surface observations RUC Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 0.5° Reflectivity Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 850mb Temperature Advection Simulated Total Reflectivity . topographical characteristics • A warm front is noted by a theta gradient strong frontogenesis along the • The locations of frontogenesis and theta gradients with respect to the TC . mesoscale boundaries center are similar to observations but displaced westward. Enhanced coast east of the TC center. A region of enhanced reflectivity is north of • Of these factors, mesoscale boundaries are a prominent forecasting the warm front near the TC center. reflectivities are present to the north of the frontal boundary in locations challenge due to the small spatial scales and complex origins. where 850mb warm advection is occurring. 1800 UTC 1 September • The purpose of this study is to isolate the physical processes at play 1800 UTC 1 September during the interaction of tropical cyclones (TC) and boundaries, and then investigate the predictability and impact
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Architectural Resource Survey: Eastern Shore – Accomack And
    HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY EASTERN SHORE—ACCOMACK AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES VIRGINIA HURRICANE SANDY DISASTER RELIEF ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES PREPARED FOR VIRGINIA DEPARMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 PREPARED BY in partnership with DEBRA A. McCLANE Architectural Historian Contract Publication Series 15-374 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY, EASTERN SHORE, ACCOMACK AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES, VIRGINIA Hurricane Sandy Disaster Relief Assistance Program for Historic Properties by Sarah J. Reynolds, M.H.P Prepared for Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Ave Richmond, VA 23221 Prepared by Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 151 Walton Avenue Lexington, Kentucky 40508 Phone: (859) 252-4737 Fax: (859) 254-3747 CRA Project No.: V15V004 _________________________ Alan Higgins, MS Principal Investigator June 2017 intentionally left blank ABSTRACT Between February 2016 and January 2017, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., in association with Debra A. McClane, Architectural Historian, completed a historic architectural resource survey of Accomack and Northampton counties on the Eastern Shore of Virginia. This survey was part of a series of projects funded through a $1.5 million Hurricane Sandy Disaster Relief Assistance Grant for Historic Properties that the National Park Service awarded to the Commonwealth of Virginia by way of the Department of Historic Resources in 2014. The pass-through project funds were awarded to seven counties in Virginia, including Accomack and Northampton counties, and administered by the Department of Historic Resources; Accomack County, Northampton County, and the Accomack- Northampton Planning District Commission served as local partners. In the event of future severe storm events or other natural disasters, this initial survey effort will support disaster mitigation planning at the local, county, and regional levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond, VA Hurricanes
    Hurricanes Influencing the Richmond Area Why should residents of the Middle Atlantic states be concerned about hurricanes during the coming hurricane season, which officially begins on June 1 and ends November 30? After all, the big ones don't seem to affect the region anymore. Consider the following: The last Category 2 hurricane to make landfall along the U.S. East Coast, north of Florida, was Isabel in 2003. The last Category 3 was Fran in 1996, and the last Category 4 was Hugo in 1989. Meanwhile, ten Category 2 or stronger storms have made landfall along the Gulf Coast between 2004 and 2008. Hurricane history suggests that the Mid-Atlantic's seeming immunity will change as soon as 2009. Hurricane Alley shifts. Past active hurricane cycles, typically lasting 25 to 30 years, have brought many destructive storms to the region, particularly to shore areas. Never before have so many people and so much property been at risk. Extensive coastal development and a rising sea make for increased vulnerability. A storm like the Great Atlantic Hurricane of 1944, a powerful Category 3, would savage shorelines from North Carolina to New England. History suggests that such an event is due. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 came ashore in North Carolina as a Category 4 to directly slam the Mid-Atlantic region. It swirled hurricane-force winds along an interior track of 700 miles, through the Northeast and into Canada. More than 100 people died. Hazel-type wind events occur about every 50 years. Areas north of Florida are particularly susceptible to wind damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean:Tropical Storm Ernesto
    CARIBBEAN:TROPICAL Information Bulletin no. 2/2006 STORM ERNESTO 27 August 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 183 countries. In Brief This Bulletin is being issued for information only, and reflects the situation and the information available at this time. The Federation is not seeking funding or other assistance from donors for this operation at this time. The International Federation undertakes activities that are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to achieve the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: · Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. · Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. · Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. · Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information specifically related to this operation please contact: · In Cuba: Dr Foyo Ceballos, Secretary General, Cuban Red Cross, [email protected] · In Haiti: Dr. Michaele Amedée Gédéon, President, Haitian National Red Cross Society e-mail: [email protected] phone (509) 222 55 54; Dr. Jean-Pierre Guiteau, Executive Officer, Haitian
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1-4 Northeast Florida
    Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program Volume 1-4 Northeast Florida Volume 1-4 Northeast Florida Region Technical Data Report CHAPTER II REGIONAL HAZARDS ANALYSIS Volume 1-4 Northeast Florida Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program This page intentionally left blank. Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program Volume 1-4 Northeast Florida Table of Contents II. REGIONAL HAZARDS ANALYSIS ..................................................................... II-1 A. Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment .............................................................. II-1 B. Tropical Cyclones .................................................................................................... II-6 1. Coastal Storms /Hurricane Hazard Profile .......................................................... II-6 2. Hurricane Hazards........................................................................................... II-7 3. Storm Surge: The SLOSH Model ....................................................................... II-8 a. Hypothetical Storm Simulations ................................................................ II-8 b. The Grid for the Northeast Florida SLOSH Model ...................................... II-10 c. Storm Scenario Determinations .............................................................. II-10 d. Determining Storm Surge Height and Flooding Depth ............................... II-12 e. Variations to Consider ........................................................................... II-12 f. Storm Tide
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions During URI/NHC/AOC Hurricane Preparedness Webinars
    Frequently Asked Questions during URI/NHC/AOC hurricane preparedness webinars: Q: What is the average length of the eye of the hurricane? How big is the eye of a hurricane? A: The average size of an eye is about 20 to 30 miles across; we have seen few that have very small eyes and sometimes those storms are very strong. We can have eyes that are as small as 5 to 10 miles across and sometimes as big as 40 to 50 miles across but on average they are about 20 to 30 miles across. Q: How long can a hurricane last? A: Hurricane typically last from several days to a week or so. Hurricane life cycles may run their course in as little as a day or last as long as a month. On occasion, they can last as long as a couple or even several weeks. The longest-lived hurricane was Hurricane Ginger in 1971 that lasted an entire month. The longest-lasting tropical cyclone ever observed was Hurricane/Typhoon John, which existed for 31 days as it traveled a 13,000 km (8,100 mi) path from the eastern Pacific to the western Pacific and back to the central Pacific. There have also been many tropical cyclones that remained at hurricane intensity for 12 hours or less, including the Atlantic hurricane, Ernesto, in 2006. HSS links: http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/science/hurricanelifecycle/ Q: What was the strongest hurricane in history? A: The strongest hurricane in the Atlantic basin was Hurricane Wilma in 2005. It had peak winds of 185 mph and the pressure was an exceedingly low 882 millibars (26.05" of mercury).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1-3 North Central Florida Region Technical Data Report
    Volume 1-3 North Central Florida Region Technical Data Report CHAPTER II REGIONAL HAZARDS ANALYSIS This page intentionally left blank. Statewide Regional Evacuation Studies Program Volume 1-3 North Central Florida Table of Contents CHAPTER II REGIONAL HAZARDS ANALYSIS .................................................................... 1 A. Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment ........................................................................ 1 1. Frequency of Occurrence .................................................................................................... 1 2. Vulnerability Factors ............................................................................................................ 1 3. Vulnerability Impact Areas .................................................................................................. 1 B. Coastal Storms and Hurricanes .............................................................................................. 5 1. Coastal Storm /Hurricane Hazard Profile .......................................................................... 5 2. Hurricane Hazards ................................................................................................................ 7 3. Storm Surge: The SLOSH Model ........................................................................................ 8 4. Hurricane Wind Analysis.................................................................................................... 17 5. Tornadoes ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Shore of Virginia Regional Dredging Needs Assessment
    Eastern Shore of Virginia Regional Dredging Needs Assessment Prepared for: Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program Prepared by: Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission This project was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant #NA15NOS4190164 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface i Acknowledgements i Executive Summary ii I. INTRODUCTION 1 Geographical and Jurisdictional Setting 1 Mainland Peninsula 1 Islands and Tidal Marshes 2 Eastern Shore Waterways 2 Ecomomic Justification for Need 2 Funding and Maintenance 3 USCG Aids to Navigation 4 Local Commitment to Maintenance 4 II. METHODOLOGY 5 III. RESULTS 9 Federal Waterways 9 CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR 17 CHESCONESSEX CREEK 18 CHINCOTEAGUE BAY GREENBACKVILLE 18 CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE 19 CHINCOTEAGUE INLET 19 DEEP CREEK (ACCOMACK CO.) 21 GUILFORD CREEK 21 LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER 22 NANDUA CREEK 23 OCCOHANNOCK CREEK 23 ONANCOCK RIVER 24 OYSTER CHANNEL 25 PARKER CREEK 25 QUINBY CREEK 26 STARLING CREEK 27 TANGIER CHANNELS 27 WISHART POINT CHANNEL 29 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (WCV) 29 Non-Federal Channels, Creeks, and Waterways of Concern 37 CHINCOTEAGUE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD BASE 41 FOLLY CREEK TO METOMPKIN INLET 41 KINGS CREEK 41 METOMPKIN INLET 41 GARGATHY CREEK 42 GREAT MACHIPONGO INLET AND CHANNEL 42 HUNGARS CREEK 42 HUNTING CREEK 43 NASSAWADOX CREEK (and Church and Warehouse Creeks) 43 PUNGOTEAGUE CREEK 45 RED BANK CREEK 45 QUINBY – EASTERN END OF FEDERAL CHANNEL TO QUINBY INLET 45 WACHAPREAGUE CHANNEL AND DAY MARKER 122 TO WACHAPREAGUE INLET 46 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Tracking Lab Background
    Hurricane Tracking Lab Background: Hurricanes are one of nature’s most powerful disasters. To equal the power of a hurricane, one would have to set off about a thousand nuclear devices per second for as long as the hurricane rages. Hurricane season runs from June 1st to November 30th every year due to thunderstorms forming over the hot, moist air in the Atlantic Ocean. While it is very difficult to predict where a hurricane will travel, prediction is very important – especially if you are in its path. In this lab you will be plotting the path of some of the most deadly and devastating recent hurricanes to hit the United States. You will be asked to analyze the strength of the hurricanes; compare their speed of travel; and the path of their destruction. "The greatest potential for loss of life related to a hurricane is from the storm surge." states Brian Jarvinen, from the National Hurricane Center. Storm surge is simply water that is pushed toward the shore by the force of the winds swirling around the storm. This advancing surge combines with normal tides to create the hurricane storm tide, which can increase the mean water level 15 feet or more. In addition, wind driven waves are superimposed on the storm tide. This rise in water level can cause severe flooding in coastal areas, particularly when the storm tide coincides with normal high tides. Being that much of the United States' densely populated Atlantic and Gulf Coast coastlines lie less than 10 feet above mean sea level, the danger from storm tides is tremendous.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Ernesto (AL052012) 1-10 August
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Ernesto (AL052012) 1-10 August 2012 Daniel P. Brown National Hurricane Center 20 February 2013 Updated 20 February to correct causes of the direct fatalities. Updated 13 December to correct dates in the last two paragraphs of section a. Ernesto was a weak tropical storm as it passed through the Windward Islands and eastern Caribbean Sea. It quickly strengthened over the northwestern Caribbean Sea and became a category 2 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) just before landfall along the coast of the southern Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. a. Synoptic History Ernesto formed from a tropical wave that exited the west coast of Africa on 27 July. Over the next couple of days, the wave moved westward across the eastern tropical Atlantic and was accompanied by disorganized showers and thunderstorms. By 29 July, when it was located about midway between the west coast of Africa and the Lesser Antilles, a broad low pressure area formed in association with the wave. A couple of days later, the thunderstorm activity became more concentrated, and early on 1 August the low-level circulation became better defined. This resulted in the formation of a tropical depression by 1200 UTC 1 August, centered about 760 n mi east of the Windward Islands. The “best track” chart of the tropical cyclone’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The best track positions and intensities are listed in Table 11. The depression moved briskly westward to west-northwestward to the south of a strong mid-level anticyclone.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of Atlantic Hurricane Activity For
    SUMMARY OF 2012 ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONE ACTIVITY AND VERIFICATION OF AUTHORS' SEASONAL AND TWO-WEEK FORECASTS The 2012 hurricane season had more activity than predicted in our seasonal forecasts. It was notable for having a very large number of weak, high latitude tropical cyclones but only one major hurricane. The activity that occurred in 2012 was anomalously concentrated in the northeast subtropical Atlantic. While Superstorm Sandy caused massive devastation along parts of the mid-Atlantic and Northeast coast, its destruction was viewed to be within the realm of natural variability. By Philip J. Klotzbach1 and William M. Gray2 This forecast as well as past forecasts and verifications are available via the World Wide Web at http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu Emily Wilmsen, Colorado State University Media Representative, (970-491-6432) is available to answer various questions about this verification. Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Email: [email protected] As of 29 November 2012 1 Research Scientist 2 Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science 1 ATLANTIC BASIN SEASONAL HURRICANE FORECASTS FOR 2012 Forecast Parameter and 1981-2010 Median 4 April 2012 Update Update Observed % of 1981- (in parentheses) 1 June 2012 3 Aug 2012 2012 Total 2010 Median Named Storms (NS) (12.0) 10 13 14 19 158% Named Storm Days (NSD) (60.1) 40 50 52 99.50 166% Hurricanes (H) (6.5) 4 5 6 10 154% Hurricane Days (HD) (21.3) 16 18 20 26.00 122% Major Hurricanes (MH) (2.0) 2 2 2 1 50% Major Hurricane Days
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Surge Dynamics Over Wide Continental Shelves
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 Storm surge dynamics over wide continental shelves: numerical experiments using the Finite- Volume Coastal Ocean Model Joao Lima Rego Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Rego, Joao Lima, "Storm surge dynamics over wide continental shelves: numerical experiments using the Finite-Volume Coastal Ocean Model" (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3882. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3882 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. STORM SURGE DYNAMICS OVER WIDE CONTINENTAL SHELVES: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS USING THE FINITE-VOLUME COASTAL OCEAN MODEL A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by João Lima Rego Licenciado , University of Lisbon, 2004 M.S., University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 2006 August 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I begin by thanking my adviser, Dr. Chunyan Li, whose teaching skills and hard work set an example that will be hard to forget. His patience and guidance were very much appreciated during my years at LSU. I am also grateful to the other committee members, Drs.
    [Show full text]