Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-17 Revised June 2017 Cover Photos Top left: John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org Lower left: John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org Lower right: Richard Old, XID Services, Inc., Bugwood.org Lower center: Steve Hurst, USDA-NRCS Plants Database, Bugwood.org In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Printed on recycled paper Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.) Elm family (Ulmaceae) Siberian elm is common in southwestern States and is listed • Clusters of 2 to 5 small, green, drooping flowers as a noxious tree in New Mexico. This field guide serves as without petals occur from February through April before leaves develop. the U.S. Forest Service’s recommendations for management of Siberian elm in forests, woodlands, and • Reproduces primarily via seed; roots re-sprout when rangelands associated with its Southwestern Region. The top growth is damaged. Southwestern Region covers Arizona and New Mexico, • Clusters of smooth, circular, winged, samara-type which together have 11 national forests. The Region also fruit with single seed in the center occur from April to administers 4 national grasslands located in northeastern May. New Mexico, western Oklahoma, and the Texas panhandle. Ecology Description Impacts/Threats In moist environments, Siberian elm (synonyms: Asiatic With adequate soil moisture, Siberian elm germinates elm, dwarf elm, and Manchurian elm) is a fast-growing, readily and grows rapidly. It quickly out-competes hardy, mid-sized (60 to 70 feet tall), deciduous tree. In drier desirable native plants, especially in sparsely vegetated or locations, it is smaller and takes on a shrubby appearance. disturbed areas. A high density of Siberian elm can reduce Siberian elm has an open crown with upward-growing shade-intolerant species (including quality forage) and branches and many flexible, pendulous, brittle branchlets decrease overall species diversity. that easily break off. There is usually a large accumulation Site/Distribution of leaves and woody litter that build up in the understory Siberian elm prefers open areas but tolerates a wide range beneath Siberian elm. Siberian elm is often confused with of conditions, which includes long periods of drought, cold Chinese elm, Ulmus parvifolia, which grows only to 30 to winters, poor soil conditions, high winds, and low 40 feet in height and typically has leaves longer than 2 moisture. In the Southwest, it commonly grows on inches. disturbed grounds, moist streambanks, pastures and rangelands, and rights-of-way along roads and railroads. Growth Characteristics Siberian elm does not tolerate flooding and seldom invades • Deciduous tree (up to 70 feet tall) with an open, mature forest because of its high requirement for sunlight. rounded crown that is 3/4 as wide as it is tall; slender, spreading branches. Spread Siberian elm seed is primarily dispersed via wind, although • Trunk has rough grey or brown bark with shallow, seed may also be transported by water and animals. Seed irregular furrows. may be carried long distances by adhering to surfaces and • Twigs are silver-grey, yellowish, or grayish-brown, undercarriages of logging equipment and vehicles. The tree zigzag-shaped with a leaf bud at each bend and is still sold commercially and is used for shade, scattered spots (lenticels). shelterbelts, and windbreaks in Oklahoma and Texas. • Alternate leaves; 0.5 to 2.5 inches long, tapered at Invasive Features each end with a simple serrate or entire margin; Siberian elm can dominate new locations in just a few upper surface deep green; lower surface paler green years due to its adaptability, high rate of seed production with hairs along vein axils. Leaves may turn yellow and germination, and rapid growth. in autumn. 1 Management Manual Methods It is very difficult to restore native plant communities with Hand removal – Newly emerged seedlings and saplings large infestations of Siberian elm. However, populations with a stem diameter less than 3/8 inch are easily removed can be reduced with careful planning and long-term by hand pulling or hoeing. Small trees with a stem actions. Consider the following actions when planning a diameter between 3/8 and 2.5 inches may be hand management approach: grubbed with a shovel, hoe, or weed tool such as the Weed Wrench™ or Root Talon™. • Maintain healthy and diverse plant communities to prevent or limit Siberian elm infestations. Suppression by cutting – In areas with just a few large trees, trunks may be cut close to the ground to remove top • Limit disturbance and/or promptly revegetate growth. Anticipate that root and trunk re-sprouts will disturbed areas with desirable perennial forage return later in the growing season and will require species, especially perennial grasses. repeated follow-up cutting. Cutting is more effective • Detect and eradicate new populations of Siberian when followed up with a chemical treatment (see cut- elm as early as possible. stump treatment in the “Chemical Control” segment • Combine mechanical and chemical methods for below). most effective Siberian elm control. Girdling – In late spring to midsummer on larger trees, • Implement monitoring and a follow-up treatment use an ax, saw, or chain saw to make two horizontal, plan for missed plants and seedlings. circumferential cuts around the entire trunk. Place one cut 3 to 4 inches above the other through the bark and • Map and keep annual records of reported cambial tissue. Using a blunt object, such as the ax head, infestations. knock off and remove the bark between the cuts. Care Table 1 summarizes some management options for should be taken to remove only the bark and outside controlling Siberian elm under various situations. Further cambial tissue while minimizing damage to the wood details on these management options are explained below. (xylem). Deeper cuts made into the wood often trigger Choice of which method(s) to use will depend on a Siberian elm into re-sprouting from the roots. Leave number of factors including where the population is girdled trees in place for 2 to 3 years and check located and the stage of tree life. Consider carefully the periodically to ensure that cut edges in the bark do not current land use and site conditions (accessibility, terrain, grow together again. See the “Chemical Control” segment microclimate, other flora and fauna present, etc.). Other below for information about combining girdling with a important considerations include treatment effectiveness, herbicide application. cost, and the number of years needed to achieve control. Mechanical Methods More than one control method may be needed for a Tractor-mounted grubbing implements are especially particular site. useful for control of scattered individual trees. A grubbing Physical Control tool mounted as part of a tractor’s front hydraulics can drive a blade into the soil to sever below the root crown To control Siberian elm, it is necessary to destroy the root and uproot the plant onto the surface. Grubbed Siberian system. Physical control can be done on a range of elm should be piled, dried, and burned or mulched rather scales—from individual plant removal (from hand tools to than left on the surface to prevent the plant from re- excavators) to broad-scale clearing (from tillers to rooting. After treatment, it is necessary to monitor bulldozers). Mechanical clearing often requires repeated grubbed areas for 2 or 3 years and re-treat as necessary. applications. 2 Table 1. Management options* Site Physical Control Cultural Control Biological Chemical Control Control Roadsides, Seedlings (< 3/8" diam.) and Use seed, mulch, and fill Consider Light infestations: for trunks < irrigation ditches, saplings (3/8 to 2.5" diam.): dig materials certified to be intensive, short- 3' diam. and less than 8' tall, use fence lines, or or grub with shovel, hoe or weed weed-free. term grazing of basal bark treatment; for trunks non-crop areas tool. seedlings and > 3" diam., girdle or use cut- Train road crews to identify young trees with stump with herbicide. Small trees (2–3" diam.): remove and report infestations along male goats.
Recommended publications
  • Lacebark Elm Cultivars Ulmus Parvifolia
    Lacebark Elm Cultivars Ulmus parvifolia P O Box 189 | Boring OR 97009 | 800-825-8202 | www.jfschmidt.com Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer II’ PP 7552 Tall, upright and arching, this cultivar’s growth habit is unique Allee® Elm among U. parvifolia cultivars, Zone: 5 | Height: 50' | Spread: 35' being reminiscent of the grand Shape: Upright vase, arching American Elm. Its exfoliating Foliage: Medium green, glossy bark creates a mosaic of orange, Fall Color: Yellow-orange to rust red tan and gray, a beautiful sight on a mature tree. Discovered by DISEASE TOLERANCE: Dr. Michael Dirr of University of Dutch Elm Disease and phloem Georgia, Athens. necrosis Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer I’ Bark of a mature tree is a mosaic of orange, tan, and gray patches, Athena® Classic Elm giving it as much interest in winter Zone: 5 | Height: 30' | Spread: 35' as in summer. The canopy is tightly Shape: Broadly rounded formed. Discovered by Dr. Michael Foliage: Medium green, glossy Dirr of University of Georgia, Fall Color: Yellowish Athens. DISEASE TOLERANCE: Dutch Elm Disease and phloem necrosis Ulmus parvifolia ‘UPMTF’ PP 11295 Bosque® is well shaped for plant- ing on city streets and in restricted Bosque® Elm spaces, thanks to its upright Zone: 6 | Height: 45' | Spread: 30' growth habit and narrow crown. Shape: Upright pyramidal to Fine textured and glossy, its dark broadly oval green foliage is complemented by Foliage: Dark green, glossy multi-colored exfoliating bark. Fall Color: Yellow-orange DISEASE TOLERANCE: Dutch Elm Disease and phloem necrosis Ulmus parvifolia ‘Dynasty’ A broadly rounded tree with fine textured foliage and good Dynasty Elm environ mental tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elms of Co Cork- a Survey of Species, Varieties and Forms
    IRISH FORESTRY The elms of Co Cork- a survey of species, varieties and forms Gordon L. Mackenthun' Abstract In a survey of the elms in County Cork, Ireland, some 50 single trees, groups of trees and populations were examined. Four main taxa were recognised, these being 'W)'ch elm, Cornish elm, Coritanian elm and Dutch elm plus a number of ambiguous hybrids. While a large overall number of elms were found, the number of mature or even ancient elms is relatively small. Still, there are sufficient numbers of elms in the county to base a future elm protection programme 011. Keywords Ulmus, 'N)'ch elm, field elm, hybrid elm, Dutch elm disease. Introduction Elm taxonomy is known to be notoriously difficult. For the British Isles there are many different concepts, varying between just two elm species and more than one hundred so-called microspecies (Richens 1983, Armstrong 1992, Armstrong and Sell 1996). The main reason for the difficulty with elm taxonomy lies in the fact that the variability within the genus is extreme. This is especially tme for the group of elms we know under the name field elm. As a result, there is no generally accepted system for classification of the elms of the world. Some British researchers claim to host up to eight elm species in their country (Melville 1975, Clapham et a1. 1987, Stace 1997). The approach taken here follows the lines being drawn by Richard H. Richens (1983) who followed a fairly simple strategy. He assumcd that there are just two species of elms prescnt in the British Isles, the native wych elm, Ulmus glabra and the introduced field ehil, U minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacebark Elm Scientific Name: Ulmus Parvifolia Order
    Common Name: Lacebark Elm Scientific Name: Ulmus parvifolia Order: Urticales Family: Ulmaceae Description The leaf arrangement of the lacebark elm (also known as Chinese elm) is alternate. Each leaf is oval with a serrate margin. Typical leaf coloration is leathery green, with purple, red, and yellow in the fall. The tree grows to a height of 40 to 50 feet with a spread of 35 to 50 feet. The bark is thin, thus giving rise to its common name as the lacebark elm. The tree produces a hard and dry fruit that brown and typically less than .5 inches in length. The root system contains a number of large-diameter members located close to the surface, and can grow for a long distance from the trunk. Growth Habit Lacebark elm is deciduous, but has been known to be evergreen in the southern extent of its range. The trees typically have a single trunk, although some have split trunks. They typically grow to a mature height of over 10 – 12 feet. It produces a bloom from late summer to fall which is yellow to green in color. A fruit is set in the fall. Hardiness Zone(s) The USDA hardiness zones for this plant are 5B through 10A. Culture Lacebark elm has no demanding culture for its habitat, and is considered to be quite hardy. It grows well in part shade as well as full sun, and has a high drought tolerance. For habitats near ocean, it has a moderate air-borne salt tolerance. For soils, it tolerates nearly all types, from clay, to sand, to loam.
    [Show full text]
  • Srp770 1996 Woody Ornamental Evaluations
    This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. 1996 WOODY ORNAMENTAL EVALUATIONS 25th Year Edition Report of Progress 770 Wichita Horticulture Research Center Agricultural Experiment Station Kansas State University, Manhattan Marc A. Johnson, Director This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIES AND CULTIVAR TRIALS Page New Plant Introductions . 1 Effect of Landscape Exposure on Taxus and Buxus Cultivars . 2 Crape Myrtle Evaluations . 4 Hardy Evergreen Azalea Evaluations . 6 Fruit Thinning of Crabapple by Florel® . 9 Evaluation of Maple Species and Cultivars . 11 Shantung Maple Performance . 13 Hardiness of Lacebark Elm Selections . 15 PRODUCTION AND PROPAGATION TRIALS Selection of Improved Osage Orange Cultivars . 16 Evaluation of Cottonwood and Hybrid Poplars . 17 Effect of SPIN OUT™ on Container Plants . 19 WEATHER SUMMARY . 21 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 22 The Horticulture Research Center was areas are devoted to orchard and vegetable crops. established in 1970 on a 40-acre tract of land at 95th and South Hydraulic, Wichita, KS and Research in ornamentals emphasizes evaluations expanded to 80 acres in 1991 for the purpose of of plants for hardiness to Zone 6a-USDA. evaluating horticultural plants for south central Additional research includes selection of Kansas, including turf, ornamentals, fruit, and improved cultivars, propagation and exposure vegetable crops. The soil is a deep alluvial studies, plus field and container production deposit of Canadian fine sandy loam and Elandco evaluations for the Kansas nursery industry.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Non-Native Plant Invasiveness Ranking Form
    NEW YORK NON-NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Scientific name: Ulmus pumila L. USDA Plants Code: ULPU Common names: Siberian elm Native distribution: Asia Date assessed: October 18, 2009 Assessors: Gerry Moore Reviewers: LIISMA SRC Date Approved: Form version date: 10 July 2009 New York Invasiveness Rank: Moderate (Relative Maximum Score 50.00-69.99) Distribution and Invasiveness Rank (Obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form) PRISM Status of this species in each PRISM: Current Distribution Invasiveness Rank 1 Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Not Assessed 2 Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Not Assessed 3 Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Not Assessed 4 Finger Lakes Not Assessed Not Assessed 5 Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Widespread Moderate 6 Lower Hudson Not Assessed Not Assessed 7 Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Not Assessed 8 Western New York Not Assessed Not Assessed Invasiveness Ranking Summary Total (Total Answered*) Total (see details under appropriate sub-section) Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 (20) 3 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 (25) 19 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 (25) 17 4 Difficulty of control 10 (10) 3 Outcome score 100 (80)b 42.00a † Relative maximum score 52.50 § New York Invasiveness Rank Moderate (Relative Maximum Score 50.00-69.99) * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value in “Total Answered Points Possible.” If “Total Answered Points Possible” is less than 70.00 points, then the overall invasive rank should be listed as “Unknown.” †Calculated as 100(a/b) to two decimal places. §Very High >80.00; High 70.00−80.00; Moderate 50.00−69.99; Low 40.00−49.99; Insignificant <40.00 Not Assessable: not persistent in NY, or not found outside of cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Living Collections at the National Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin (T to Z)
    Index to the Living collections at the National Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin (T to Z) Tanacetum argenteum (XX.012208 - RRA, RRC; 2011.0510 - RRP), Tanacetum densum subsp. amani (2012.0577 - AB; 1970.0797 - RRA; 2008.2279 - RRB; 1970.0797 - RRC; 2008.2279 - RRP), Tanacetum macrophyllum (XX.010778 - Fam3), Taraxacum pamiricum (1994.0288 - AY-B03), Taxodium distichum (1926.009958 - P5; XX.013850 - P6), Taxodium distichum var. imbricatum 'Nutans' (1979.0327 - P5), Taxodium mucronatum (XX.008930 - P5), Taxus baccata (XX.013859 - A5N; 2001.0391 - RRG(w); XX.014200 - RRL; XX.014201 - RRL; XX.014202 - RRL; XX.014203 - RRL; XX. 014204 - RRL; XX.006552 - TX; XX.006559 - TX; XX.006560 - TX; XX.006583 - TX; XX.006596 - TX; XX. 001100 - VG; XX.009509 - VG, VG, VG, VG; XX.009513 - VG, VG; XX.009539 - VG), Taxus baccata 'Adpressa Aurea' (1886.006605 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Adpressa Erecta' (1969.0452 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Argentea' (XX.006607 - TX), Taxus baccata Aurea Group (XX.006574 - TX; XX.006581 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Aurea Pendula' (XX.005491 - P2, P2; XX.006539 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Barronii' (XX.006606 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Densa' (XX.006608 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Densifolia' (XX.006563 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Dovastoniana' (XX.006550 - P2), Taxus baccata 'Dovastonii Aurea' (XX.006551 - TX; XX. 006565 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Dovastonii Major' (XX.006582 - TX; XX.006599 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Elegantissima' (XX.005492 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Erecta' (1921.006578 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Fastigiata' (XX.013638 - C2-W; XX.011179 - R4; XX.010844 - R5; XX.010833 - R6; XX.006562 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Fastigiata Aurea' (XX.010845 - R5; XX.010834 - R6; XX.006536 - TX; XX.006547 - TX; XX.006555 - TX; XX.006564 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Fisheri' (XX.006546 - TX), Taxus baccata 'Gracilis Pendula' (XX.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Resistant Ornamental Trees
    HOME GROUNDS FACT SHEET Horticulture Center Cornell University Demonstration & Community Gardens at East Meadow Farm Cooperative Extension 832 Merrick Avenue East Meadow, NY 11554 Nassau County Phone: 516-565-5265 Disease-Resistant Ornamental Trees and Those Relatively Free of Disease Some trees show resistance to certain of the more Flowering crabapples serious tree diseases. Others are relatively free from * Malus ‘Adams’ o major disease problems under growing conditions found Malus baccata var. himalaica in the Northeast. Many of these latter types are used Malus ‘Cardinal’ All unmarked crab- only occasionally in shade and ornamental plantings, a * Malus ‘Centurion’ o apples are resistant to Malus ‘David’ cedar apple rust, fire fact that may account for the general absence of dis- Malus ‘Donald Wyman’ blight, powdery mildew and scab. eases. However, with the increased limitations on the * Malus floribunda o use of effective fungicides for the control of tree dis- Malus ‘Henry Kohankie’ o Crabapples suscep- tible to one or more eases, it would be advisable to check the lists below Malus ‘Inglis’ of the mentioned dis- and substitute one of these trees for a tree that is Malus ‘Professor Sprenger’ eases, but still worth susceptible to diseases. * Malus ‘Profusion’ planting. Malus ‘Robinson’ * Indicates varieties * Malus sargentii o commonly available on Long Island. Resistant to Dutch elm disease: * Malus ‘Sugar Tyme’ o Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese elm) Ulmus glabra 'camperdownii' (Scotch elm) Junipers resistant to twig blight caused by Resistant to chestnut blight, but Phomopsis juniperovara: susceptible to twig blight and canker: Juniperus chinensis Castanea mollissima (Chinese chestnut) ‘Foemina’ ++ Castanea crenata (Japanese chestnut) ‘Iowa’ ‘Keteleeri’ ++ Resistant to witch’s broom: * ‘Robusta green' Celtis sinensis (Chinese hackberry) * var.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forest Tree Species Research for the ACT
    Project Name: Urban Forest Tree Species Research for the ACT Contracted Entity: The Australian National University Client: Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate (EPSDD) 1 | Page College of Science /Fenner School of Environment and Society [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] The Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia www.anu.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 00120C 2 | Page Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Context ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3. Consultancy Brief .......................................................................................................................... 11 4. Methodological background ......................................................................................................... 12 4.1. Urban forests and tree health ................................................................................................... 12 4.2. Urban drought and tree decline ............................................................................................... 13 4.3. Safe useful life expectancy ........................................................................................................ 14 5. Method ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Lacebark Elm
    Athena ‘Emer I’ Classic Lacebark Elm Lineage Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese elm, Lacebark elm, Drake elm). Also known as ‘Emerald Isle’. PP7551 Introduced in 1989 (Dave’s Garden, 2011). Tree Form A medium-sized tree with a broad rounded canopy, often with a trunk that forks resulting in a vase shape similar to that of the American elm (Floridata, updated 11/18/2010). Tree size, leaf size and growth rate half of that of the American elm, and they are often planted as a single tree (Warren, 2000). Height: 30 to 40 feet Width: 35 to 45, up to 60 foot wide crown spread (Delmar Learning, undated; UConn, undated)) Foliage Dark green in summer, leathery, almost black; bronze to bronze-brown in fall (Cornell, undated). Leaves simple, 1 to 2 inches long, but half as wide. Ovate, margins rounded to serrate (Delmar Learning, undated). Late deciduous, almost evergreen in mild climates (Floridata, 2010). Culture NA Disease and Insect Information Literature (Dutch elm disease studies, insect resistance assessments, etc.): Resistant to Dutch Elm Disease (DED), phloem necrosis and Elm Leaf Beetles (Delmar Learning, undated). It resists DED and shows very good performance under dry conditions (UConn, undated). Completely immune to Gypsy Moth, and only 10% of the leaf tissue was consumed by Japanese Beetle, the lowest of all the asian elms tested in a no-choice study (Paluch et al., 2006). When the Japanese Beetles were given a choice of species they did not feed on the U. parvifolia at all (Paluch et al., 2006). In an earlier similar study, U. parvifolia was the most resistant of all cultivars and hybrids to the Japanese Beetle (Miller et al., 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • ELMS for NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson, NSA 2011
    THE NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM PRESENTS ELMS FOR NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson, NSA 2011. For more plant information, visit arboretum.unl.edu or retreenbraska.unl.edu. Elms are majestic trees with a tall, arching habit that makes them useful for providing shade along streets, parks, and backyards. Elms are also relatively tolerant of poor soils and extreme weather. While Dutch elm disease has eliminated much of the old elm population in Nebraska, many new hybrids and cultivars show promising resistance and are making the elm o.k. to plant again. Elm Species 1. American Elm - Ulmus americana: disease resistant varieties include ‘Princeton’, ‘Jefferson’, ‘Valley Forge’ and ‘New Harmony’; 50-70’x50-70’. Note that ‘Valley Forge’ has poor branch angles and shows a tendency to break apart in wind storms. 2. Japanese Elm - Ulmus davidiana var. japonica (very cold tolerant; rounded habit; glossy green; 45’x 45’) 3. Lacebark Elm - Ulmus parvifolia (distinctive mottled bark; small glossy leaves; 35’x 25’) 4. Rock Elm - Ulmus thomasii (distinctive corky stems; upright habit; DED resistance in west; 50-60’x 30-40’) Elm Hybrids and Cultivars 5. ‘Accolade’ - looks like American elm; Morton Arboretum hybrid of U. japonica and U. wilsoniana; 50’x 40’. 6. ‘Cathedral’ - tough and adaptable; developed in Wisconsin; U. pumila x U. japonica; 40-50’x 40-50’. 7. ‘Discovery’ is a promising U. davidiana cultivar selected from Manitoba Canada; 45-50’x40-45’. 8. ‘Emerald Sunshine’ is a cultivar of Ulmus propinqua known for clean habit and yellow fall color; 30-40’. 9. ‘Frontier’ - smaller, glossy leaves; lacy bark pattern; purple fall color; U.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Resistant Elm Selections Bruce R
    RESEARCH LABORATORY TECHNICAL REPORT Disease Resistant Elm Selections Bruce R. Fraedrich, PhD, Plant Pathology Many hybrids and selections of Asian elm that have reliable resistance to Dutch elm disease (DED) are available for landscape planting. In addition to disease resistance, these elms tolerate urban stress and are adapted to a wide range of soil conditions. These selections are suitable for routine planting in areas where they are adapted to the climate. Descriptions in this report are based primarily on performance of trees growing in the arboretum at the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories in Charlotte, North Carolina (Zone 8). Accolade Elm in Northern Plains States where low temperatures and low rainfall limit successful use of other cultivars. Ulmus davidiana var. japonica ‘Morton’ A selection of Japanese elm, Accolade elm exhibits Commendation Elm strong resistance to DED and is expected to be resistant to elm yellows. This selection is a favored host Ulmus ‘Morton Stalwart’ of Japanese beetle which can cause defoliation in years A hybrid between U. carpinifolia, U. pumila and U. with heavy outbreaks. Accolade grows rapidly and davidiana var. japonica, Commendation has the has a vase shape with a mature height of 60 feet. It has fastest growth of any of the Morton Arboretum been planted extensively in many Midwestern cities introductions. This cultivar has an upright, vase shape (zone 4). Danada Charm (Ulmus ‘Morton Red Tip’) is but has a distinctively wider crown spread than an open pollinated selection from Accolade and has Accolade or Triumph. The leaves are larger than most similar habit and appearance. Danada Charm does hybrid elms and approach the same size as American not grow as rapidly as Accolade or Triumph in elm.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5 Landscaping City of Titusville Technical Design Manual
    City of Titusville, Florida Code of Ordinance, Volume II Land Development Regulations, Landscaping Technical Manual 1 2 3 4 Section 5 Landscaping City of Titusville Technical Design Manual 5 Page 1 of 12 City of Titusville, Florida Code of Ordinance, Volume II Land Development Regulations, Landscaping Technical Manual 1 Contents 2 5.1. INTENT. .......................................................................................................................... 3 3 5.2. TREES AND SHRUBS. ................................................................................................... 3 4 5 Page 2 of 12 City of Titusville, Florida Code of Ordinance, Volume II Land Development Regulations, Landscaping Technical Manual 1 LANDSCAPING 2 3 5.1. INTENT. 4 The City of Titusville Technical Design Standards have been adopted by the Titusville City Council. 5 These standards are required to be met when applying to the City for a Development Order (permit). The 6 Land Development Regulations (LDR) will continue to have overall policy requirements specific to each 7 section. The landscaping regulations can be found in Chapter 30 of the LDR. 8 5.2. TREES AND SHRUBS. 9 Table 1 includes the City’s approved trees and shrubs recommended for use in all landscaped 10 areas and the City’s list of nuisance trees recommended for removal. Table 1. Approved trees and shrubs recommended for use in all landscaped areas Water Common Name Botanical Name Usage CANOPY TREES (50—100' ht) Bald cypress* Taxodium distichum M, H Cedar Cedrus sp. L Chinese elm/Drake
    [Show full text]