The Alternative Press in Microform. PUB DATE Apr .77 \ - NOTE 23P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Alternative Press in Microform. PUB DATE Apr .77 \ - NOTE 23P 'OA DOCURENT EESUNE ED .143 340 IR 005 015 AUTHOR Tsang, Daniel C. A TITLE The Alternative Press in Microform. PUB DATE Apr .77_\ - NOTE 23p. ;Best copy available EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$1.67 Plus Postage.s- DESCRIPTORS CoMparative Analysis.; *Evalua'ticn Criteria; Indexing; Library Collections; *Micofilm; *Microform.s; Preservation; *Publishing Industry; lieference 1 Materials; *Research Reviews '(Publications) IDENTIFIERS *Alternativ-1Public ati ns; Radical Press,," A-BSTR-ACT Pt sented.is an analysis of what has been done reg*arding the pre efvation of alterretive publicationSin microfilm. '` The alterna.tive`pfesswaS defined, for the 'purposes of this study, as 'nonstandard, nonestalishment publicatiOns. TWO projects undertaken . to microfilm such publications, one by the Microphoto'Division of Bell and Howell and the other by Ha'rvester Press-, were contrasted, with respect to completeness, quality of,. microfilm, and ease of access. The Harveste collection,' which focusesonBritish . publications, is see to be the more n early complete of the two, and it provides more s isfactory external, finding aids. However, a subject index to the contents of the publ'ia'ations is not available or. either -collection, and neither cffers iDdividual titles for p rch,ase.A related study found that only 44%' of the publications indexed by Alternative- Press Centre were microfilmed leading to the conclusion that libraries may be doing tgheir patrons ,a disservice if they do,not subscribe to all the' publications available. Their value or historidal research; risk of loss through fire; airoheft, rdeterioration); and the limited number of libraries maintaining such collections are the major reasons cited for the publications to be 'reproduced and preserved on film. A brief commentary on 'other micropthblishers engaged In filming radical publications and recommendations for future action are Included.'P. bibliography and titles available from Bell and Howell and Alternative Press Centre in microfilm are Appended. (Author/JR,F) ********************************************************************# Documents acquired by ERIC include' many informal unpublished * * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every e(fort,* * to obtain the best -copy available. Neverthelss, items of marginal ** * reproducibility are often encountered and4his affects the quality *, * of the microfiche end hardropy reproductio-rts ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Releduction Service '(EDR$) .EDRS is not * * responsible for tilt quail- -y of the original document. Reproductions *, f'*supplied by 'EDRS are the .best thatAcp.n be Made from thee, original, **********************p*****.****************4,*********************** 4 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEENREPIR,Q, DUCE() EXACTLY AS RECEIVEU FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATiONORIGiN- STING IT POINTS OF UiEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFF IC1AL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY . THE ALTERNATIVE .PRESS IN PICROFORM PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS COPY RIGHTED MATERIAL HASBEENGRANTED BY -t0 EPIC ANO OPGANIZATIAS rl A OPERATING J UNDER AGREEMENTS WITH THE NATIONALIN STITUTE OF EDUCATION FURTHER REPRO, RUCTION OUTSIDE THE ERIC SYSTEM RE. OUIPES PERMISSION OF -THECOPYRIGHT I I OWNER PiKIWI\ VariCOM 1,2 7 DANIEL C. TSANG APRIL 1977 . ti 0 2 ti CONTENTS a - , INTRODUCTION 1 3. THE ALTERNATIVE,PRESS 2 THE CASE'FOR MICROREPRODUCING THE ALTERNATIVE PRESS 3 PROGRESS TODATEt\ X CRITICAL ANALYSIS 7 . RECOMMENDATIONS FdR FUTURE ACTION . 13 APPENDIX A: THE KEWSPAPERS OF IUNDER=, GROUND PRESS COLLE ION* '-o,* ... .... ,..,, APPENDIXB: --, 04,, tp, .4,e TITLES,INDEXED BY '' ( -I PRESS CENTRE.AVAI IN MICROFORM' ) 17 BIBLIOGRAPHY , 20 3 I INTRODUCTI o In this paper I will attempt: to-presst a 'critical, analysis of wh:has been, done regardingthe preseation of alternative publications in microform,and offer my o suggestions for what should be done to reproducethese publications on film. The paper should alsoserve as a useful research guide for _ - others seeking a selected listof alternative publications in microform. The compilltion containstitles of\publications currently indexed by the Alternative'Press Cent\ r which ,are 'available in microform. 1 , A D . 4 O THE ALTERNATIVE PRESS What constitutes the "alternative press" is a matter of dispute,. Various compilers have defined the alternative press' in different ways. Robert H. guller subtitled his classic 2-Volume study From Radical Left to Extreme Right (1970) as follows: "a bibliography of current periodicals of protest, controversy, advocacy, or dis6ent ..." The Alternative Press Index made- it appearance in 1970 subtitled: "an index to the publications which amplify the cry for social change and social , justice." Danky in )his introductioneto Undergrounds: A Union List .; (1974) noted that "run two definitions are likeley to be the same."What seems clear is that the term, as contemporaries clefide it, apply to the publications generated. -by the social and 'spolitical upheavals of ,the 1960's; .Spiers (1974) argues that before 1965, the underground press just did not exist. It may have 9f course, but not in the way we understand it .today. I'myself am content wit]; the broad definition adopted by ,Danl;y and Fox in their occasional column on the alternative media which,ap ears 'in the-Wilson Library Bulletin: "Non-standard, non - establishment publications." s \ re- -a. ti THE CASE FOR MICROREPRODUCNG THE ALTERNATIVEPRESS 7. Why-Should we 'attempt topreserve the alternative press in microform.? Very' igimply it is because film, underarchival t . conditipns,°liets much longerthan newspaper. BUt.l.hatanswer, - . of course, is inadequate. Is the alternativea:essworth. preserving?' T Xerox University Microfilms, it isunderstood, felt that some sthe underground press materialwas"inpoor taste". and . reportedly Stopped:. microfilming it, accordingto Mr. StevensRice (April1977)1 Irtdeed_s_Muller has noted (1970, v. 1, xacii-xxiii) that: A great obstacle is, the trait -ional,concernof librarians about quality.--"The mainpurpose of, bookselection, inprofessional rhetoric, is 'to dhooSe the good,screen out the shoddy, and build up a "choice" collection that will"educate and elevate the publicbY.offering.. them the . "best ". Yet, considerations 'of "quality." may be inappropriate when it: comes' to choosing'polemic tracts,How important, after all, is the style , in which, an opitiOn is expressed?What if a :; Viewpointbe printed on poor ,paper, withsbad .ypbgralphy's many..errors in spelling,inelegant langUatel=and much profanity? What ift, the reason- ing be ilogical?The drawings lacking in artistry? ,What if-this,viewpoint so shoddily tricked out is, ..'"-"furthermore, read eagerly by only a' few hundredor. thousand 'people? A tract; though half-literate, - 4.s still a document. If it puts for ward;- or -lies,liith intent to deceive,shonld it% be excluded? 'On such 'groundsMany.librarians reject astrology, numerology,` palmistry, descriptionsof 'dubious medical ',4-rcure'ietc..,:..4..is hardtoknow where todrewtile: line. What"..a, librarian`'should avoid is excludingapoint of ,view,b,ecause,2he is 'offended bythe way in which it is -presented. ,: 3 6 t .. -\ I' I \, Itisincumbent onlibrarians tOday not tO act as censors of i what future) generations inay wantI to read. What, is good'or poor taste? after all, is ayariablieacross time and among,people. a Taste should not be thecrite4ionto base a decision on whether or not one-should preserye the l*aIternatiVepress. Who are* we to . V prevent fdture historians from studying the protest movements of the 1960s,'.anditsassociated ephemera, just because we /- happen to be hung- up avei qflality?'...Our role as librarians -5 is to provide serviCe'-..... in.tfacademic libraries to serious researchers. - Our role is definitely note to act as guardians of morality or of establishment views. Some two dozen libkaries already maintain special colXectlbns . I. '..... of. alternative. publicatiCns (Akeroyd and benedict,,l973), and , -. graduate students and faculty are beginning to use the resources' / ) for serious study (Palmer? l97). The fact that a limited number, of academic libr4es maintain such collections underscores 'the need for easyiacces's to the material: Ease of access can be facilitated if these materials are microfilmed. Judith F. King, Cf.the ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom,- has been quoted (in 'a Bell add Howell advertisement) as folloVs: "In the long run, the newspapers' will havegreat.histpilcal and research value. Unfortuneateli,,the stockon which they are printed is mot of the-best quality, and immediateattempts to preserve them .must be made. If this is not done; the whole. period of turmoil th," we are currently (late 1960's . experiencing 4 12- o will be,'lost to history." In the .same brochure, ,Herbert... Finch, ; Curator and ,Archivist at Cprnell University, was quoted as saying: f Kt .. e "I think that-a.compiIation- of-these newspapers, easily available on microfilm, 'should beccime an outstanding souice-of , , -- --, _information for scholars 'Who wish to study inc. this era of student unrest and rebellionArDich 'has been sO-iniiuential'-On . - contemporary-histdry. Since these papers, even_at-thetime,,--, ....- of.publicati apvery difficult.to_Acipire.thrOugh ordinalT , do, . -k - - channels,,I think that it is, most important that you try to', make your filmed set as, comprehensive'as
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORM ATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quali^ of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North2^eeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 OPENING TECHNOLOGY DISCOURSES TO DIFFERENCE: A RHIZOANALYSIS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Patricia Ann O'Riley, B.Ed., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents in Microform. INSTITUTION Illinois State Library, Springfield
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 121 240 IR 003 198 AUTHOR Lyons, Janet, Ed. TITLE Documents in Microform. INSTITUTION Illinois State Library, Springfield. PUB DATE Mar 76 NOTE 62p. JOURNAL CIT Illinois Libraries: v58 n3 March 1976 p187-244 EDRS PRICE MR-S0.83 HC-$3.50 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Depository Libraries; Government Publications; Information Sources; *Library Acquisition; *Library Collections; Library Planning; Library Surveys; Microform Readers; *microforms; Microreproductiou IDENTIFIERS Bureau of the Census; Congressional Information Service; Government Printing Office; *Illinois; Illinois Library Association; United Nations ABSTRACT This issue of "Illinois Libraries" contains the papers delivered at a 1974 workshop on government publications in microform. Twelve articles focus on such issues as: 1) reasons to collect microforms; 2) criteria for selecting microform documents; 3) microform hardware and software; 4) procurement procedures; 5) bibliographic control; and 6) specific information regarding microforms published by the Congressional Information Service, the Government Printing Office, the Bureau of the Census, the United Nations, and other state and federal agencies. A bibliography listing reviews of documents in microform and the results of a survey of microform collections of government documents in Illinois also are included. {FMB) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDPS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original.
    [Show full text]
  • Iso 11506:2017
    This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922197 INTERNATIONAL ISO STANDARD 11506 Second edition 2017-07 Document management applications — Archiving of electronic data — Computer output microform (COM)/ Computer output laser disc (COLD) Applications de gestion de documents — Archivage de données électroniques — Microforme de sortie d’ordinateur (COM)/Disque laser de sortie d’ordinateur (COLD) Reference number ISO 11506:2017(E) © ISO 2017 This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922197 ISO 11506:2017(E) COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 ISOCH-1214 copyright Vernier, office Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 www.iso.org [email protected] ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-922197 ISO 11506:2017(E) Contents Page Foreword ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Standard 681S3 Media Sanitization
    STATE OF ALABAMA Information Technology Standard STANDARD 681S3-00: MEDIA SANITIZATION A key element of information security is confidentiality, protecting data stored on digital and non- digital media from unauthorized disclosure throughout the system life cycle. Legacy data remaining on storage media poses significant security vulnerability and is an organizational liability if the data is compromised or otherwise disclosed. When storage media are transferred, become obsolete, or are no longer usable as a result of damage, it is important to ensure that residual magnetic, optical, or electrical representation of data that has been deleted is no longer recoverable. Sanitization is the process of removing data from storage media, such that there is reasonable assurance, in proportion to the sensitivity of the data, that the data may not be retrieved and reconstructed. Once the media is sanitized, it should be impossible or impractical to retrieve the data. OBJECTIVE: Define requirements for sanitization of stored data assets that provide an appropriate level of security (in accordance with State IT Policy 681: Information Protection) to State of Alabama information. SCOPE: These requirements apply to all Executive Branch agencies, boards, and commissions except those exempt under The Code of Alabama 1975 (Title 41 Chapter 4 Article 11). REQUIREMENTS: The following State of Alabama requirements are based on the recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found in Special Publication 800-88: Guidelines for Media Sanitization. Storage media covered by these requirements includes but is not limited to paper and microforms, hand-held devices (cell phones, personal digital assistants, palm devices), networking devices, floppies, hard drives, USB removable media with or without hard drives (including pen drives, thumb drives, flash drives, memory sticks), ZIP disks, magnetic tapes, optical disks, and memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeing Voices of Dissent in the Underground Newspaper Collection
    Laurie Charnigo Prisoners of Microfilm Freeing Voices of Dissent in the Underground Newspaper Collection “We are a people, and a people must have their own voice, and that voice is the underground press.”1 - Thomas King Forcade 1. Bad juju I put the finishing touch on the display case in the lobby of our library, a sign in bold newsprint: “Come Explore the UPS Underground Newspaper 41 Collection (1963-1975)!” Stepping back to admire my creation, I almost had to brace myself against the dizzying psychedelic collage of graphics. This display screamed not only “Look at me!” but “Damn! I’m cool!” And oh how cool it was covered with photos, comics, and covers from a wide range of colorful Vietnam-era ‘underground’ newspapers. The bright art of Black Panther’s Emory Douglas shouted “Power to the People!” Psychedelic covers of the San Francisco Oracle flashed Vedic Motifs, bearded gurus, and hookah- smoking shamans. Gilbert Sheldon’s Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers and Trina Robbins’ feminist superheroes playfully danced throughout the display. There were photos of protesters marching for civil rights, gay rights, women’s rights, and in opposition to the war in Vietnam. There were raised fists of solidarity, peace signs, concert posters, a real lava lamp (which I hoped wouldn’t burn the library down), and covers of the Berkeley Barb, Avatar, the Los Angeles Free Press, and many others. Books about the Vietnam-era underground press were featured prominently throughout the display, such as Ken Wachsberger’s extensive Voices from the Underground series and John McMillian’s Smoking Typewriters: The Sixties Underground Press and the Rise of Alternative Media Laurie Charnigo is education librarian at Jacksonsville State University in Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Resources & Technical Services
    LIBRARY RESOURCES & TECHNICAL SERVICES Vol. 30, No. 3 July/September 1986 CONTENTS Page From the Editor's Desk. 181 Acronyms Appearing in This Issue 182 Technical Services in 1984 and 1985: Micrographics, Optical Disk Technology, and Fair Use. Tamara Swora and Audrey Fischer. 183 Resources. Marcia Pankake. 218 Serials. Germaine C. Linkins. 238 Descriptive Cataloging: A Selected, Annotated Bibliography, 1984-1985. C. Donald Cook and EllenJones. 248 A Survey of the Literature on Subject Analysis for 1984-1985. Doris Cruger Dale and Betty-Ruth Wilson. 261 A Two-Year Perspective on Library Preservation: An Annotated Bibliography. Lisa L. Fox 290 In Memoriam: Josephine S. Pulsifer, 1915-1986 319 Letters to the Editor 320 Index to Advertisers 322 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION RESOURCES AND TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION EDITORIAL BOARD Editor and Chair of the Editorial Board . .. ............ .. ... ELIZABETH L. TATE Editor-Designate . ....... ...... ..... .............. .. ...... SHEILA S. INTNER Assistant Editors: ELAINE SVENONIUS . .. .. .. .. for Cataloging and Classification Section CAROLYN HARRIS . .... .... for Preservation of Library Materials Section FRANCIS F. SPREITZER . ... for Reproduction of Library Materials Section MARTIN J. F AIGEL . .. ......... .. ... .. .... .for Resources Section LINDA SAPP VISK .. .... .. .. .. .. .. ... .... for Serials Section EDWARD SWANSON . .. ....... .... ... .. .. ... Special Editor Ex-Officio Members: JENNIFER YOUNGER, Chair, Council of Regional Groups THOMAS W. LEONHARDT, Editor, RTSD Newsletter WILLIAM I.BUNNELL, Executive Director, RTSD Library Resources & Technical Services (ISSN 0024·2527), the quarterly official publication of the Resources and Technical Services Division of the American Library Association, is published at ALA Headquarters, 50 E. Huron St.,.Chicago, IL 60611. Business Manager: William Bunnell, Exec­ utive Director, Resources and Technical Services Division of the American Library Association. Editorial Office: 11415 Farmland Drive, Rockville, MD 20852.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Imaging Center Annual Report 2015
    FRANKLIN COUNTY DOCUMENT IMAGING CENTER 2015 Annual Report Simak, Emily Recorder Terry J. Brown Director Debra Willaman Issued to the County Microfilming Board and the Board of County Commissioners 4/4/2016 1 | P a g e 1 / 1 / 2 0 1 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Franklin County Microfilming Board Page 3 Introduction Page 4 Expenditures and Revenue Page 7 The Production Report Page 8 Annual Prepping Report Page 17 The Modernization of Microfilm Page 18 2 | P a g e 2015 FRANKLIN COUNTY MICROFILMING BOARD OFFICERS & MEMBERS Clerk of Courts Maryellen O’Shaughnessy, Chair Auditor Clarence E. Mingo, Vice-Chair Recorder Terry J. Brown, Secretary Treasurer Edward J. Leonard, Member Commissioner John O’Grady, Member REPRESENTATIVES Clerk of Courts Representative Antone White Auditor Representative George Mance Recorder Representative Brian E. Shinn Treasurer Representative Stephen A. Porte Commissioner Representative Lauren M. Rummel 3 | P a g e Document Imaging Center Annual Report 2015 Introduction Franklin County Recorder Terry J. Brown, Administrator of the Document Imaging Center, Debra Willaman, Director of the Center, and the Center staff are pleased to submit the 2015 Operations Report in accordance with Ohio Revised Code Section 307.805. This Section requires, “On the first Monday in April of each year the county recorder shall file with the county microfilming board and the board of county commissioners a report of the operations of the center and a statement of the receipts and expenditures of the Center during the year.” Overview Realizing the importance of image quality and availability in government documents, the Recorder’s Document Imaging Center’s vision is to provide unsurpassed document conversion and indexing services for Franklin County agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1350.20B Order Federal Aviation Administration
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1350.20B ORDER FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SUN: MICROGRAPHICS / ELECTRONIC IMAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE. This order establishes procedures and assigns responsibilities for the effective management of micro- graphics and optical disk systems in FAA. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This order is distributed to the division level in Washington, regions, and centers, and to all Records Management Officers. 3. CANCELLATION. Order 1350.20A, Micrographics Management Program, dated December 12, 1981, is canceled. 4. BACKGROUND. Recent advances in micrographics and optical disk technologies now provide atfractive alterna- tives to the printed page. These advances have been stimulated by the spiraling increases in the cost of postage and printing; the continued proliferation of paperwork; and the emergence of new automated relrieval methods. 5. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. This revision expands the agency's micrographics management program to in- clude optical disk systems. Also included are pertinent references to Federal regulations recently issued by General Serv- ices Administration (GSA) and National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). a. Micrographics is the technology which reduces any form of information to microform for later use. b. Microform is a general term for microimages recorded on film that includes microfiche, aperture cards, micro- film, and computer-Output-Microfiche (COM). c. Micrographic System is a configuration of equipment and procedures that utilizes microforms for the produc- tion, reproduction, viewing, or retrieval of required documentation. d. Micropublishing is the use of microforms in lieu of printed copy involving production of more than 250 dupli- cates from original microform. Administrative records converted to microforms are excluded. e. Optical Disk is a laser recorded medium that can electronically store up to 80,000 pages or images per disk in Write Once Read Many (WORM) format and up to 300,000 pages per disk for the Compact Disk-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) type.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE ADMINISTRATION Section 1, Records Management Chapter 1, Filing Systems
    OFFICE ADMINISTRATION Section 1, Records Management Chapter 1, Filing Systems The basic premise for establishing filing systems within an organization is the ability to retrieve records. Appropriate storage of records is the key to records retrieval; a means to an end, with the end being retrieval. The average cost of each misfiled record or filing error is more than $100. A. ANALYZING RECORDS AND RECORDS SYSTEMS Information in the form of documents can be categorized as records and nonrecords. Records are official documents valuable enough to be retained and stored in a format for future use. Nonrecords are of temporary use and eventually disposed of. Classifying Records Records are either active or inactive and classified according to use. Active records are accessed and utilized in the current administration of business functions. Inactive records are no longer referred to on a regular basis but still of limited importance. Importance of Records Records are classified as vital, important, useful, or nonessential. Vital records are irreplaceable such as accounting, insurance policies, legal documents, etc. Important records can be replaced or duplicated if lost or destroyed. Useful records can be easily replaced and nonessential records are not necessary for the restoration of the company and have no predictable value. The Records Cycle A record’s life cycle extends from the moment the record is created until its final disposition. Figure 1- 1 on page 4 of your book shows a records life cycle diagram. Records retention schedules are developed and the value of specific records is determined. A schedule specifies the period of time a record should be stored.
    [Show full text]
  • Microforms: Marriages, Mergers, and Migrations
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons School of Information Faculty Publications School of Information 2005 Microforms: Marriages, Mergers, and Migrations Authors: Anna H. Perrault “Migration” is a term used to describe the reformatting of materials or the moving of information from one format to a different format. The onc version of printed and original documents to microformats was a migration from paper, which was regarded as impermanent, to film, which was regarded as permanent. Today the term “migration” is most often used to denote the conversion of print or microform texts to electronic format to another. This paper begins with a brief history of the development of microforms as a storage and preservation medium with emphasis on the last two decades of the twentieth century in the United States. Recent issues in access and preservation are examined. Finally, the future of microforms is considered in light of migration to electronic formats for preservation. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Perrault, Anna H., "Microforms: Marriages, Mergers, and Migrations" (2005). School of Information Faculty Publications. 27. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/27 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Information Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Microforms: Marriages, Mergers, and Migrations by Anna H. Perrault History The production of microforms can be traced to an invention by John Dancer of Manchester, England, who in 1839 had the idea of “marrying” two devices with lenses to fashion a camera which would produce the magnification of a microscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog and Handbook 2016 / 2017
    CATALOG AND HANDBOOK 2016 / 2017 1 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 2016–2017 Fall Semester 2016 August Term Courses* August 8–19 Drop and Grading Basis Change Deadline for August Term Courses August 8, 4:00 p.m. Candler and Emory Orientation for New International Students August 16 Candler Pre-Orientation Activities August 16 Candler Orientation for All New Students August 17–19 photo: M. Patrick Graham Patrick M. photo: Last Day to Request a Course Withdrawal for August Term August 19, 4:00 p.m. New MDiv Student Required Pre-term Events August 23 First Class Day for Regular Fall Courses August 24 Last Day to Request a Course Add/Drop/Swap Deadline for Withdrawal for January Term January 7, 4:00 p.m. Regular Fall Courses August 31, 4:00 p.m. First Class Day for Regular Labor Day Holiday (No Classes) September 5 Spring Courses January 9 Grading Basis Change Deadline September 7, 4:00 p.m. New Student Orientation January 9 Degree Application Deadline Incomplete Work for Fall 2016 Due January 13 for December 2016 Graduates September 9 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Date of Record September 14 (No Classes) January 16 Fall Break (No Classes) October 10–11 Add/Drop/Swap Deadline for Regular Spring Courses January 16, 4:00 p.m. Spring 2017 Preregistration Advising Period October 12–28 Grading Basis Change Deadline for Regular Spring Courses January 23, 4:00 p.m. Spring 2017 Preregistration November 1–6 Date of Record February 1 Thanksgiving Break (No Classes) November 24–25 Degree Application Deadline Spring 2017 Add/Drop/Swap Begins November 28 for May
    [Show full text]
  • University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd
    Collection: SC-0031 University Archives and Special Collections Joseph P. Healey Library University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 [email protected] MAX BLUESTONE PAPERS 1947-1981, bulk 1965-1978 Accession Number: 087-03 Repository: University of Massachusetts Boston. University Archives and Special Collections Creator: Max Bluestone Title: Max Bluestone papers Date [inclusive]: 1947-1981, bulk 1965-1978 Extent: 12 linear feet (nine record cartons, one document case, one legal-sized document case, one newspaper box, and three oversized folders) Language: English Citation: Courtesy of the University Archives and Special Collections Department, Joseph P. Healey Library, University of Massachusetts Boston: Max Bluestone papers Processing Information: Finding aid reviewed by Catherine Shaw, October 2012. Processed by Meghan Bailey and Brook Duchesneau in November 2017. Conditions on Use and Access: This collection is open for research. Copyright: Copyright restrictions may apply. PROVENANCE The papers of the Max Bluestone were donated to University Archives and Special Collections in the Joseph P. Healey Library at the University of Massachusetts Boston in January 1987 by Joanne Bluestone. ARRANGEMENT AND PROCESSING NOTES The original arrangement of folders and original folder titles were retained in most cases. Folder titles created by the archivist and information added to original folder titles are indicated by brackets in the folder list. Student records and duplicates have been removed. The following University of Massachusetts Boston publications have been moved to their own collections: Mass Media, Bulletin, and the weekly Calendar. This collection was used in 1988 for an archives processing project. Students in Jim O’Toole’s class, Introduction to Archival Methods, created processing proposals for the unprocessed collection.
    [Show full text]