DOCSLIB.ORG

The Second Coming, Part 2 the Abomination of Desolation Matthew

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Second Coming, Part 2 the Abomination of Desolation Matthew The Second Coming, Part 2 The Abomination of Desolation Matthew 24:15-28 January 27th, 2019 Intro History of the temple First temple Solomon’s Temple, built during the time of Solomon who reigned from 971 to 931 BC, stood for more than 300 years before it was destroyed in 586 BC by the Babylonians. Second Temple Rebuilt under Zerubbabel around 516 BC on the same site, modest by comparison, as some very old returning exiles saw the foundation and compared it to the first temple, they wept at the modest size. It was completely refurbished and expanded upon by Herod beginning in 20 BC so that by the time Jesus and His disciples walked in the temple complex, it was magnificent and massive. Destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD. For Christians a physical temple is no longer needed. The sacrificial system has been fulfilled in the once for all sacrifice of Jesus and now His people are the temple (1 Cor. 6:19ff, 2 Cor. 6:16ff) But for many of the Jewish people there remains a longing for the temple. It’s difficult to see how it could be rebuilt at this point. The site is currently occupied by two ancient buildings that are sacred to Islam – the Dome of the Rock that was built in AD 691 and the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Third temple A still future temple is described in Revelation 11:1-2 Revelation 11:1-2 Then there was given me a measuring rod like a staff; and someone said, "Get up and measure the temple of God and the altar, and those who worship in it. 2 "Leave out the court which is outside the temple and do not measure it, for it has been given to the nations; and they will tread under foot the holy city for forty-two months. Revelation was written in the last decade of the first century, between AD 94 and 96, more than 20 years after the destruction of the temple in AD 70 so it can’t be talking about that temple. But of this temple it is said that the people of the nations will tread it under foot for 42 months – 3 ½ years. That length of time will show up over and over again in the series of passages we see today so take note of it. It’s this future temple that will be violated as described in the passage we will study today in Matthew 24 that will kick off the final period of great destruction known as the great tribulation. Among the Orthodox Jews in Israel today preparation is already underway for this temple. The articles for the temple have been made, priests have been trained, they only await an opportunity to build. It’s hard to see how that opportunity could come. The site has become a sacred location for Islam and so the nation of Israel knows they would be inviting all out war to raze the site and allow the temple to be rebuilt. Some archeologists believe the location of the original temple might be slightly different than the dome of the rock, allowing it to be rebuilt without destroying the Dome of the Rock. It may be rebuilt prior to the beginning of the 7 year period of great tribulation, or it could be rebuilt during the peaceful first half of the 7 year period. 1. The abomination of desolation will mark the beginning of the final 3 ½ years of the great tribulation .(24:15-21) This is something that well intentioned believers who agree on the essentials of the faith end up disagreeing over. Is this referring to the destruction in AD 70 or a future destruction? Does this apply to Israel or to the church? How literally do we take the passages that are linked to this one? I’ve got a position that I’ll articulate that I think best handles the verses. But others disagree, even in this room. I think they are wrong but I don’t think this is a gospel issue. Key to understanding this section is understanding this phrase – “the abomination of desolation.” Would it stand out to us as much if it didn’t roll off of the tongue so wonderfully? Jesus views it as a significant and definable event. When this occurs, the reader should know to flee. It’s an interesting phrase – let the reader understand. Implying that not just His original audience of disciples but those who read this message at the applicable time can know to be warned. Jesus tells us this is from the book of Daniel, so I want to spend significant time in Daniel to see what He is referencing. There are 3 passages that reference the abomination and a fourth that we will look at because it ties in. The book of Daniel describes this event. (v. 15) a. The abomination will occur in the middle of a seven year period. (Daniel 9:24-27) i. The angel Gabriel is speaking to Daniel (v. 21) in response to his confession of the sins of the people and lament about the destruction of Jerusalem. ii. 70 weeks – 70 sevens – 70 periods of 7 years iii. Focused on the Jewish people – your people, your holy city, sacrificial language iv. Jesus will accomplish all that is listed in v 24 in either His first or second coming – He will finish transgression, make an end of sin, and bring in everlasting righteousness in his second coming and already made atonement for sin in His first coming. v. The timing begins with a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. 1. 7 plus 62 “weeks” – or 483 year from this event to the Messiah. 2. Persian king Artaxerces’ issued a decree to rebuild Jerusalem in 444 B.C. (almost 100 years after this prophecy). So if we adjust for a slightly different way of measuring a year that they used, that places Jesus as entering Jerusalem in A.D. 30 – exactly according to prophecy. 3. Jerusalem is rebuilt during that time, even during distress. vi. But then the Messiah is “cut off” – He is killed, crucified. vii. Jerusalem will be destroyed along with the temple by the people of the prince who is to come. Not by this “prince” but by the same people group he would come from. 1. The Romans destroyed the city and the temple in 70 AD. viii. But there is still one more week remaining. Verse 27 brings up this 70th week. It doesn’t tell us when it will be – is it right after this 69th week? Is it later? Because it is listed separately, it appears to be later. 1. This prince arises from a reformed Roman empire and makes a covenant with Israel for one week – 7 years. He makes a peace treaty that should last for 7 years. There’s a period of peace for the first 3 ½ years. 2. In the middle of that 7 years – 3 ½ year point – he puts an end to sacrifices and the abomination of desolation occurs. 3. It doesn’t say exactly what this abomination of desolation is – but as we compare passages we see that this figure, this prince, exalts himself to be worshipped as God. b. Forces will arise and do away with regular sacrifices. (Daniel 11:31) i. Daniel 11:31 "Forces from him will arise, desecrate the sanctuary fortress, and do away with the regular sacrifice. And they will set up the abomination of desolation. ii. Also describes the abomination of desolation as ending these regular sacrifices in the temple. It goes on to describe this king as doing “as he pleases,” and exalting and magnifying himself above every god. c. This will mark a time of great distress before the people are rescued. (Daniel 12:1, 11) i. Daniel 12:1 "Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued. ii. Daniel 12:11 "From the time that the regular sacrifice is abolished and the abomination of desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days. iii. Notice in v. 1 the language similar to Matthew 24 – there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time and your people will be rescued. 1. If that is referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, it’s hard to see how it end in rescue. iv. 11 brings up the abomination of desolation as well as sacrifice is abolished for 1,290 days – 3 ½ years. v. Another evidence that there is a temple at this time and the antichrist will violate it for 3 ½ years. d. This ruler will speak against God and wear down His people. (Daniel 7:25) i. This figure is described in Daniel 7:25 as a ruler who will arise and speak against God and “wear down” or persecute the saints for a time, times, and half a time – 3 ½ years. ii. But then he will be judged and destroyed and the kingdom of God will be established as an everlasting kingdom. e. When this occurs the people should flee because this will mark the beginning of the final 3 ½ years of great tribulation. (Matthew 24:16-21) i. When the future reader of this passage in Matthew sees this occurring, they know it’s time to flee because things are about to get much worse globally, but with the focal point in Jerusalem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Alien Legacy RIGHTS the Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH
    HUMAN This Alien Legacy RIGHTS The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism WATCH This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-419-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 hrwnyc@hrw.org Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 berlin@hrw.org Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 hrwbe@hrw.org 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 hrwgva@hrw.org 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 hrwuk@hrw.org 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 paris@hrw.org 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 hrwdc@hrw.org Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2008 1-56432-419-2 This Alien Legacy The Origins of “Sodomy” Laws in British Colonialism I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Three Trials ......................................................................................................... 1 Colonial Laws and Contemporary Defenders ........................................................ 4 II. “Sodomy,” Colonialism, and Codification ........................................................... 13 III. Colonial Power on the Street and over the Body ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • How John Nelson Darby Went Visiting: Dispensational Premillennialism In
    University of Dayton eCommons History Faculty Publications Department of History 2000 How John Nelson Darby Went Visiting: Dispensational Premillennialism in the Believers Church Tradition and the Historiography of Fundamentalism William Vance Trollinger University of Dayton, wtrollinger1@udayton.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/hst_fac_pub Part of the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Other History Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons eCommons Citation Trollinger, William Vance, "How John Nelson Darby Went Visiting: Dispensational Premillennialism in the Believers Church Tradition and the Historiography of Fundamentalism" (2000). History Faculty Publications. Paper 8. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/hst_fac_pub/8 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact frice1@udayton.edu, mschlangen1@udayton.edu. Contents Introduction ............................................... ............ .. .... ....... .... .............. .. .. .. .. ......... 7 PART ONE: BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVES 1 Making Prophecy Come True: Human Responsibility for the End of the World, JAMES E. BRENNEMAN .... .............................................................. 21 2 Lions and Ovens and Visions, 0 My! A Satirical
    [Show full text]
  • History and Eschatology in the Book of Daniel
    [This paper has been reformulated from old, unformatted electronic files and may not be identical to what appeared in print. The original pagination has been maintained, despite the resulting odd page breaks, for ease of scholarly citation. However, scholars quoting this article should use the print version or give the URL.] Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 8/1–2 (1997): 195–205. Article copyright © 1997 by William H. Shea. History and Eschatology in the Book of Daniel William H. Shea Biblical Research Institute Daniel is something of a bipolar book. Its first six chapters cluster around the history of the Neo-Babylonian empire and the early Persian rule in Babylon. The last six chapters of the book give an apocalyptic outline that ends with the great eschatological climax. Thus it is appropriate to examine both subjects in a survey of Daniel. That makes our approach here threefold. First, history on its own terms, then the link between history and eschatology, and finally, eschatol- ogy on its own terms. Historical Survey I begin this study with a brief review of the present status of the historical chapters with regard to their historicity when evaluated by extra-biblical docu- ments. The Conquest of Jerusalem and the Third Year of Jehoiakim. The two major historical problems in Daniel l were resolved with the publication of the first 13 years of Nebuchadnezzar's Chronicles by D. J. Wiseman in l956. The last half of the entry for the year 605 states, "at that time Nebuchadnezzar con- quered the whole of Hatti-country". The designation Hatti or Hittite country includes all of Syria and Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Or What Is the Abomination of Desolation? 1
    Who or What is The Abomination of Desolation? (Mat 24:3-22) “As Yahshua sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, Tell us, what shall be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the world? Jesus answered, Take heed that no man deceives you. For many will come in My name, saying, I am Christ, and will deceive many (1st Seal = White Horse of Rev 6:1-2). And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not troubled, for all these things must occur; but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom (2nd Seal = Red Horse of Rev 6:3-4). And there will be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in different places (3rd Seal = Black Horse of Rev 6:5-6). All these are the beginning of sorrows. Then they will deliver you up to be afflicted and will kill you. And you will be hated of all nations for My name's sake. And then many will be offended, and will betray one another, and will hate one another (4th Seal = Pale Horse of Rev 6:7-8). And many false prophets will rise and deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many will become cold. But he who endures to the end, the same shall be kept safe. And this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be proclaimed in all the world as a witness to all nations. And then the end shall come.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisdom in Daniel and the Origin of Apocalyptic
    WISDOM IN DANIEL AND THE ORIGIN OF APOCALYPTIC by GERALD H. WILSON University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 In this paper, I am concerned with the relationship of the book of Daniel and the biblical wisdom literature. The study draws its impetus from the belief of von Rad that apocalyptic is the "child" of wisdom (1965, II, pp. 304-15). My intent is to test von Rad's claim by a study of wisdom terminology in Daniel in order to determine whether, in fact, that book has its roots in the wisdom tradition. Adequate evidence has been gathered to demonstrate a robust connection between the nar­ ratives of Daniel 1-6 and mantic wisdom which employs the interpreta­ tion of dreams, signs and visions (Millier, 1972; Collins, 1975). Here I am concerned to dispell the continuing notion that apocalyptic as ex­ hibited in Daniel (especially in chapters 7-12) is the product of the same wisdom circles from which came the proverbial biblical books of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Job and the later Ben Sirach. 1 I am indebted to the work of Why bray ( 1974), who has dealt exhaustively with the terminology of biblical wisdom, and to the work of Crenshaw (1969), who, among others, has rightly cautioned that the presence of wisdom vocabulary is insufficient evidence of sapiential influence. 2 Whybray (1974, pp. 71-154) distinguishes four categories of wisdom terminology: a) words from the root J:ikm itself; b) other characteristic terms occurring only in the wisdom corpus (5 words); c) words char­ acteristic of wisdom, but occurring so frequently in other contexts as to render their usefulness in determining sapiential influence questionable (23 words); and d) words characteristic of wisdom, but occurring only occasionally in other OT traditions (10 words).
    [Show full text]
  • The Recurrent Usage of Daniel in Apocalyptic Movements in History Zachary Kermitz
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2012 The Recurrent Usage of Daniel in Apocalyptic Movements in History Zachary Kermitz Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact lib-ir@fsu.edu Abstract: (Daniel, apocalypticism, William Miller) This thesis is a comparison of how three different apocalyptic religious groups interpret the Book of Daniel as referring to their particular group and circumstances despite the vast differences from the book’s original context. First, the authorship of the book of Daniel itself is analyzed to establish the original intent of the book and what it meant to its target audience in the second century BCE. This first chapter is also used as a point of comparison to the other groups. Secondly, the influence of Daniel on the authorship of the book of Revelation and early Christianity is examined. In the third chapter, the use of Daniel amongst the Millerites, a nineteenth century American apocalyptic religious movement is analyzed. To conclude, the use of Daniel amongst the three groups is compared allowing for conclusions of how these particular groups managed to understand the book of Daniel as referring to their own particular group and circumstances with some attention paid to modern trends in interpretation as well. THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE RECURRENT USAGE OF DANIEL IN APOCALYPTIC MOVEMENTS IN HISTORY By ZACHARY KERMITZ A Thesis submitted to the Department of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2012 2 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Zachary Kermitz defended on April 13, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection in Daniel 12 and Its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 1996 Resurrection in Daniel 12 and its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel Artur A. Stele Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stele, Artur A., "Resurrection in Daniel 12 and its Contribution to the Theology of the Book of Daniel" (1996). Dissertations. 148. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/148 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact repository@andrews.edu. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of the Book of Daniel (And
    The Reception of the Book of Daniel (and Danielic Literature) in the Early Church Wisdom and Apocalypticism Section SBL Annual Meeting in Washington, November 18-22, 2006 by Gerbern S. Oegema, McGill University 3520 University Street, Montreal, QC. Canada H3A 2A7 all rights reserved: for seminar use only. Any quotation from or reference to this paper should be made only with permission of author: gerbern.oegema@mcgill.ca Abstract Whereas cosmogony has traditionally been seen as a topic dealt with primarily in wisdom literature, and eschatology, a field mostly focused upon in apocalyptic literature, the categorization of apocryphal and pseudepigraphic writings into sapiential, apocalyptic, and other genres has always been considered unsatisfactory. The reason is that most of the Pseudepigrapha share many elements of various genres and do not fit into only one genre. The Book of Daniel, counted among the Writings of the Hebrew Bible and among the Prophets in the Septuagint as well as in the Christian Old Testament, is such an example. Does it deal with an aspect of Israel’s origin and history, a topic dealt mostly dealt with in sapiential thinking, or only with its future, a question foremost asked with an eschatological or apocalyptic point of view? The answer is that the author sees part of the secrets of Israel’s future already revealed in its past. It is, therefore, in the process of investigating Israel’s history that apocalyptic eschatology and wisdom theology meet. This aspect is then stressed even more in the later reception history of the Book of Daniel as well as of writings ascribed to Daniel: if one wants to know something about Israel’s future in an ever-changing present situation, one needs to interpret the signs of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Daniel Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character
    G. Ch. Aalders, “The Book of Daniel: Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character,” The Evangelical Quarterly 2.3 (July 1930): 242-254. The Book of Daniel Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character G. Ch. Aalders [p.242] In the January issue of this periodical I endeavoured to throw light upon the turn of the tide which has been accomplished in Pentateuchal criticism during the last decennia. I now want to draw the attention of our readers to another problem of the Old Testament which has been of no less importance in negative Bible criticism. The vast majority of Old Testament students have been wont to deny to the Book of Daniel any historical value and to dispute its real prophetic character. In the case of this book it again was regarded as one of the most certain and unshakable results of scientific research, that it could not have originated at an earlier date than the Maccabean period, and, therefore, neither be regarded as a trustworthy witness to the events it mentions, nor be accepted as a proper prediction of the future it announces. Now as to this date, criticism certainly is receding; and this retreat is characterised by the fact that, in giving up the unity of the book, for some parts a considerably higher age is accepted. Meinhold took the lead: he separated the narrative part (chs. ii-vi) from the prophetic part (chs. vii-xii), and leaving the latter to the Maccabean period claimed for the former a date about 300 B.C.1 Various scholars followed, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intepretation of Daniel 11:36-45
    Grace Theological Journal 4.2 (1983) 205-231. [Copyright © 1983 Grace Theological Seminary; cited with permission; digitally prepared for use at Gordon and Grace Colleges and elsewhere] AN INTERPRETATION OF DANIEL 11:36-45 GEORGE M. HARTON Dan 11:36-45 reveals the path to power of the Antichrist at the mid-point of the Tribulation period, when he initiates a new policy of aggression (11:36-39). Once he defeats the Arab and Soviet armies which attempt to stop him (11:40-45), he will inaugurate the eschato- logical climax of persecution against Israel which has been Israel's lot throughout the times of the Gentiles (12:1). * * * RECENT events in the Middle East are attracting great interest. Christians especially are challenged to correlate these events with their understanding of biblical prophecy and to seize upon opportuni- ties to witness for Christ while conversing about the Middle East. One significant passage predicting events "at the end time" in "the Beautiful Land" and at "the beautiful Holy Mountain”1 is Dan 11:36-45. Who is this "King of the North" (11:40)? Who is this king who "will do as he pleases" (11:36)? A Christian's witness for Christ concerning prophetic matters could backfire if his positions are based on anything but careful exegesis of the pertinent passages. Daniel 11 must be examined with special care in light of its difficulty.2 This study will first examine the context of this passage, then will address four crucial questions which determine the interpretive frame- work, and finally will provide a condensed commentary relating the particulars of the passage to the framework established.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: a Historical Analysis Of
    Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Lance E. Poston December 2018 © 2018 Lance E. Poston. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia by LANCE E. POSTON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Katherine Jellison Professor of History Joseph Shields Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT POSTON, LANCE E., PH.D., December 2018, History Deconstructing Sodom and Gomorrah: A Historical Analysis of the Mythology of Black Homophobia Director of Dissertation: Katherine Jellison This dissertation challenges the widespread myth that black Americans make up the most homophobic communities in the United States. After outlining the myth and illustrating that many Americans of all backgrounds had subscribed to this belief by the early 1990s, the project challenges the narrative of black homophobia by highlighting black urban neighborhoods in the first half of the twentieth century that permitted and even occasionally celebrated open displays of queerness. By the 1960s, however, the black communities that had hosted overt queerness were no longer recognizable, as the public balls, private parties, and other spaces where same-sex contacts took place were driven underground. This shift resulted from the rise of the black Civil Rights Movement, whose middle-class leadership – often comprised of ministers from the black church – rigorously promoted the respectability of the race.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Desire and Jewish Community: Queering Biblical Texts in Canadian and American Jewish Literature Shlomo Gleibman York University
    Same-Sex Desire and Jewish Community: Queering Biblical Texts in Canadian and American Jewish Literature Shlomo Gleibman York University It has been asserted that queer subjectivity can be realized in identifications with 249 certain images of mainstream culture, sometimes to a far greater extent than in “con- ventional” forms of gay life (Sedgwick, Tendencies; Butler, Bodies; Munoz; Halperin, How). These nonlinear, nonnormative identifications and disidentifications partici- pate in the formation of multiple, hybrid identities through working on, with, and against a dominant cultural form (Munoz 3-8, 30). This essay looks at Jewish queer narratives in their relation to mainstream Jewish culture, as examples of contem- porary forms of Jewish literary imagination in North America. I am interested in exploring the ways Jewish queer culture workers read a queer valence that is already present within Jewish intellectual life in its traditional form-potentially or in actual- ity in individual experiences, and imaginatively, as a rhetorical trope in some modes of literature. The queer possibilities in reading classical Jewish texts could be better under- stood in light of the Foucauldian theory of polyvalence of discourse, developed in The History of Sexuality. This theory regards discourse as never unified or fixed, but rather as “a series of discontinuous segments, not uniform nor stable, multiplicity of discursive elements that can come into play in various strategies” (Foucault 100). In this sense, the queer valence present in classical Jewish texts and in traditional patterns of studying these texts does not constitute “homoeroticism” as a uniform narrative or as a coherent element of a larger narrative; rather, this “queer kernel” could name a play of multiple “discontinuous segments” that lend themselves to cer- tain modes of reception.
    [Show full text]