DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Life-History, Settlement Dynamics and Growth of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Life-History, Settlement Dynamics and Growth of The • ,... t/.J:~40:Jf·iljj.;p11e ·eil£t coast aj· T«ts:lJiiini'ii:i\~~:::<:;'.·_. ' , <'" } ,.' ' ' ';.,. ... ~, ~ ... "" ,, ,.-;.~h', '<::..... ..._,"" ,,.,, > ... ,,:;~, , r ,< ,f' ~, '' < } ' ' ,, ', ,,, .... ~ ,::.",\" ,' ;";' ' ' ? ' ', ~· ,, ··' )'" "'subi:nitted. iri .,, '" ' '•,' /~ ' ' _·'Tasmanian Aqciaculture and Fisheries Institute-~,School o{Zo.plbgy, ', ~ ' - • ' " < Uniyersity·of Tasmania., ~ TNw-~ vJIElSFo/lt> f h. D. zoo ~ ll Declarations I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work, except where due acknowledgement is given, and that the material presented here has not been submitted at another university for the award of any other degree or diploma. This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. ,. Dirk Cameron Welsford November 2003 iii [ iv Table of Contents DECLARATIONS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• III TABLE OF' CONTENTS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• v FIGURES AND TABLES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• XIV ABSTRA.CT ••••• ••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 1. INTRODUCTION: THE ECOLOGY OF TEMPERATE WRASSES ........................... 4 Wrasse diversity .............................................................................................................. 4 Life-history strategies ..................................................................................................... 5 Biology and ecology of Notolabrus ................................................................................ 7 Wrasse fisheries .............................................................................................................. 8 Thesis outline ................................................................................................................. 9 2. A DESCRIPTION OF THE.EARLY LIFE-IDSTORY STAGES OF NOTOLABRUS FUCICOLA AND N. TETRICUS, AND OTHER TASMANIAN LABRIDS •••••••••••••••••••••••• 13 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 14 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 17 Eggs and reared larvae .................................................................................: ....................... 17 Wild caught larvae................................................................................................................. 17 Larval descriptions ........................................................................................... :.................... 18 Adult tissue ............................................................................................................................ 18 DNA extraction and PCR amplification ................................................................................ 19 RFLP analysis........................................................................................................................ 20 Post-settlement juveniles ....................................................................................................... 20 Juvenile pigment character analysis ..................................................................................... 21 v Results ........................................................................................................................... 22 Eggs and reared larvae ......................................................................................................... 22 Wild caught larvae ................................................................................................................ 25 Post-settlement Notolabrus spp ...................................................................................... : ...... 30 DNA extraction and PCR amplification ................................................................................ 30 RFLP analysis ....................................................................................................................... 31 Post-settlement pigment character analysis .......................................................................... 31 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 35 Developmental series of Notolabrus spp. .............................................................................. 35 RFLP Analysis....................................................................................................................... 37 Post-settlement pigmentation analysis .................................................................................. 39 3. INTERPRETATION OF OTOLITH MICROSTRUCTURE IN THE EARLY LIFE· IDSTORY STAGES OF NOTOLABRUS FUCICOLA AND N. TETRICUS . ....................... 41 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 42 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 45 Larval rearing ....................................................................................................................... 45 Post-settlement fish ............................................................................................................... 46 Identification, measurement and curation ............................................................................ 47 Otolith analysis ..................................................................................................................... 47 Results ......................................................................................................................... :. 50 Larval rearing ....................................................................................................................... 50 Onset of increments ............................................................................................................... 50 Oxytetracycline marking ....................................................................................................... 51 Post-OTC increments ............................................................................................................ 52 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 53 Onset of increments ............................................................................................................... 53 Validation of daily increments .............................................................................................. 56 Utility of otolith microstructure in Notolabrus spp ............................................................... 57 vi 4. SETTLEMENT DYNAMICS OF TE1\1PERA TE WRASSES ON THE EAST COAST OF TASMANIA········································································································· 58 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 60 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 62 ' Field sampling ....................................................................................................................... 62 Otolith analyses ..................................................................................................................... 65 Patterns of spawning, settlement and growth ........................................................................ 69 Results ........................................................................................................................... 70 Field sampling ..............................................•................. :...................................................... 70 Otolith analyses ..................................................................................................................... 71 Patterns of spawning, settlement and growth ....................................................................... 76 Discussion .................................................................... ,................................................ 84 Otolith morphology and microstructure ................................................................................ 84 Variability in planktonic larval duration ............................................................................... 85 Lunar periodicity in spawning and settlement dates ............................................................. 86 The influence of water temperature on settlement dynamics ................... :............................. 87 5. GROWTH OF A TE1\1PERATE, REEF-ASSOCIATED WRASSE (NOTOLABRUS FUCICOLA), ESTTh1ATED FROM AGE-AT-LENGTH AND TAG-RECAPTURE MODELS . .........................................................................................•....................... 93 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 94 Materials and Methods ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Article Evolutionary Dynamics of the OR Gene Repertoire in Teleost Fishes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Article Evolutionary dynamics of the OR gene repertoire in teleost fishes: evidence of an association with changes in olfactory epithelium shape Maxime Policarpo1, Katherine E Bemis2, James C Tyler3, Cushla J Metcalfe4, Patrick Laurenti5, Jean-Christophe Sandoz1, Sylvie Rétaux6 and Didier Casane*,1,7 1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 2 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, U.S.A. 4 Independent Researcher, PO Box 21, Nambour QLD 4560, Australia. 5 Université de Paris, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Energies de Demain, Paris, France 6 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur- Yvette, France. 7 Université de Paris, UFR Sciences du Vivant, F-75013 Paris, France. * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]. !1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Teleost fishes perceive their environment through a range of sensory modalities, among which olfaction often plays an important role.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • And Long-Term Movement Patterns of Six Temperate Reef Fishes (Families Labridae and Monacanthidae)
    Mar: Freshwater Res., 1995,46, 853-60 Short- and Long-term Movement Patterns of Six Temperate Reef Fishes (Families Labridae and Monacanthidae) Neville S. Barrett Zoology Department, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Abstract. Movement patterns were studied on a 1-ha isolated reef surrounding Arch Rock in southern Tasmania. Short-term movements were identified from diver observations, and interpretation of long-term movements involved multiple recaptures of tagged individuals. Visual observations indicated that the sex-changing labrids Notolabrus tetricus, Pictilabrus laticlavius and Pseudolabrus psittaculus were all site-attached, with females having overlapping home ranges and males being territorial. In the non-sex-changing labrid Notolabrus fucicola and in the monacanthids Penicipelta vittiger and Meuschenia australis, there was no evidence of territorial behaviour and I-h movements were in excess of the scale of the study. The long-term results indicated that all species were permanent reef residents, with most individuals of all species except M. australis always being recaptured within a home range of 100 m X 25 m or less. Only 15% of individuals of M. australis were always recaptured within this range category. The natural habitat boundary of open sand between the Arch Rock reef and adjacent reefs appeared to be an effective deterrent to emigration. The use of natural boundaries should be an important consideration in the design of marine reserves where the aim is to minimize the loss of protected species to adjacent fished areas. Introduction associated with using SCUBA in colder waters with low Most tropical reef fishes are now regarded as sedentary, visibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Marine Habitat Mapping and Near-Shore Marine Biodiversity Within the Coorong Bioregion
    Offshore Marine Habitat Mapping and Near-shore Marine Biodiversity within the Coorong Bioregion A report for the SA Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resource Management Board by the Department for Environment and Heritage, 2006. Authors: Jodie Haig (University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA) Bayden Russell (University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA) Sue Murray-Jones (Coastal Protection Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, SA) Acknowledgements Our thanks to all the following: Field Research Staff (in alphabetical order): Alison Bloomfield, Ben Brayford, James Brook, Alistair Hirst, Timothy Kildea, Hugh Kirkman, Sue Murray-Jones, Bayden Russell, David Wiltshire. Benthic Fauna Identification: SA Museum: Thierry Laperousaz, Shirley Sorokin, Greg Rouse & Karen Gowlett-Holmes Algae Identification: SA Herbarium: Professor Bryan Womersley and staff Texture mapping: Bob Lange (3D Marine Mapping) Seagrass Identification: Hugh Kirkman Echoview data analysis: Myounghee Kang (SonarData) GIS technical support: Alison Wright (Coast and Marine Conservation Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage) Funding: SA Murray-Darling Basin NRM Board This document may be cited as: Haig, J., Russell, B. and Murray-Jones, S. (2006) Offshore marine habitat mapping and near-shore marine biodiversity within the Coorong bioregion. A report for the SA Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resource Management Board. Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide. Pp 74. ISBN 1 921018 23 2. © COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Island Reef Health April 12Th 2021 SIMS
    Norfolk Island Lagoonal Reef Ecosystem Health Assessment 2020-2021 CONTENTS Executive Synopsis….....................................................................................................................5 Comprehensive Executive Summary..............................................................................................5 Section 1. Lagoonal water quality and ocean temperatures 2020-2021 ……………………………..10-29 Summary findings……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………….……………………………10 • Water Quality and Nutrient Availability • Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Conditions • Norfolk Island as a Regional Virtual Station • Water Flow and Tidal Currents • Sediment Organic Matter Content Section 2. Benthic cover Emily Bay, Slaughter Bay and Cemetery Bay 2020-2021………………30-40 Summary findings……………………………………………………………………………….…………………………….……………………………...30 • Benthic Cover Assessment for Emily Bay, Slaughter Bay and Cemetery Bay 2021 • Historical Comparison: 1988 vs. 2020 Benthic cover • Algal diversity surveys December 2020 • Fish diversity surveys December 2020 and April 2021 Section 3. Biological indicators of coral health Coral bleaching March 2020 Emily Bay and Slaughter Bay Norfolk Island………………………..…41-51 Norfolk Island Lagoonal Coral Reef Health Assessment 2020 - 2021 …………………….……………………………………..41 Section 4. Management considerations and proposed tools………………………………………………52-54 • Summary of findings and associated management considerations • Proposed outline for coral identification and coral health card • Conclusions Section 5. Review of
    [Show full text]
  • Kahawai (Arripis Trutta), and Snapper (Chrysophrys Auratus)
    Ethology and sensory physiology associated with social organisation in yellow-eyed mullet (Aldrichetta forsteri), kahawai (Arripis trutta), and snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) by Karen Lewanne Middlemiss Submitted as a thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand 2017 This thesis is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… ‒ ii ‒ Acknowledgements In the words of arguably the greatest naturalist humankind has ever known, and who since childhood has inspired my love of the natural world, “I wish the world was twice as big and half of it unexplored” – David Attenborough. Me too! My journey to becoming a biologist began in my ‘youth-adjacent’ years whilst working for the Royal New Zealand Air Force. I was on a five-month secondment at Scott Base with Antarctica New Zealand providing logistical support to hundreds of New Zealand scientists doing some amazing research during the summer of 2005/06. One of those scientists would nine years later become my doctoral supervisor; Professor Bill Davison. Together with then PhD student Dr. Esme Robinson, who became a dear friend and mentor in my early academic career, we spent many hours drilling holes in the ice-covered McMurdo Sound to catch research fish. I would later watch with intrigue as experiments were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sperm Competition and Sex Change: a Comparative Analysis Across Fishes
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00050.x SPERM COMPETITION AND SEX CHANGE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACROSS FISHES Philip P. Molloy,1,2,3 Nicholas B. Goodwin,1,4 Isabelle M. Cot ˆ e, ´ 3,5 John D. Reynolds,3,6 Matthew J. G. Gage1,7 1Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada 4E-mail: [email protected] 5E-mail: [email protected] 6E-mail: [email protected] 7E-mail: [email protected] Received October 2, 2006 Accepted October 26, 2006 Current theory to explain the adaptive significance of sex change over gonochorism predicts that female-first sex change could be adaptive when relative reproductive success increases at a faster rate with body size for males than for females. A faster rate of reproductive gain with body size can occur if larger males are more effective in controlling females and excluding competitors from fertilizations. The most simple consequence of this theoretical scenario, based on sexual allocation theory, is that natural breeding sex ratios are expected to be female biased in female-first sex changers, because average male fecundity will exceed that of females. A second prediction is that the intensity of sperm competition is expected to be lower in female-first sex-changing species because larger males should be able to more completely monopolize females and therefore reduce male–male competition during spawning.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 190702 Part 10 Document Set Redacted
    Attachment H to Proposed Approval Decision Brief Lord Howe Island Rodent Eradication Project, NSW (EPBC 2016/7703) Proposed Approval Decision ERT Review A search of the Department's Environmental Reporting Tool (ERT) on 13 July 2017 identified an additional six listed threatened species and ten migratory species that were not identified in an ERT search on 20 June 2016 (the same co-ordinates were used in the two ERT searches), within a parallelogram that encompasses all the islands of the Lord Howe Island Group (except for Balls Pyramid) and within a buffer of 2 km from the parallelogram. These species were not considered at the time of the controlled action decision on 17 September 2014. Listed threatened species The following threatened species (although previously listed under the EPBC Act) were not identified by the ERT at the time the controlled action decision was made, and therefore were not considered during the assessment process: Red Knot (Calidris canutus) - endangered Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea) – Critically endangered Herald Petrel (Pterodrama heraldica) - Critically endangered Pacific Albatross (Thalassarche bulleri platei) – Vulnerable Sei Whale (Balaenoptera borealis) – Vulnerable Fin Whale (Balaenoptera physalus) - Vulnerable These species were identified in the SPRAT search of 13 July 2017 because their distributions were updated in SPRAT subsequent to the controlled action decision for this project. The Department recently assessed the potential impacts of the proposed action on the above species and concluded that it was highly unlikely that they would be significantly impacted by the proposal. The following is a summary of this assessment Red Knot (Calidris canutus) – endangered This species is a rare, regular visitor to LHI (13 records between 1990 and 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Underwater Visual Census and Baited Remote Underwater Video
    Vol. 400: 19–36, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 11 doi: 10.3354/meps08377 Mar Ecol Prog Ser A comparison of two survey methods: differences between underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video Madhavi A. Colton*, Stephen E. Swearer Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ABSTRACT: Essential to any model, conservation or management plan are measures of the distribu- tion and abundance of a species. Countless methods for estimating these parameters exist, making it essential to assess the limitations and biases associated with a particular sampling protocol. Here, we compare between 2 methods commonly used to survey nearshore fish assemblages. Although most commonly employed, underwater visual census (UVC) may yield biased estimates of abundance depending on the strength of a fish’s behavioural response (i.e. avoidance, attraction) to the presence of divers. Baited remote underwater video (BRUV) techniques have shown promise in overcoming some of the limitations of UVC, but are unable to provide an absolute measure of density in turbulent environments. We compare the abilities of these 2 methods to survey the nearshore rocky reef ichthy- ofauna of Southeast Australia. We found that relative to BRUV, UVC recorded more individuals (in terms of all species, herbivores, cryptic species, and most territorial species), higher richness at both the species and family level, and higher biodiversity as measured using the Shannon Index. These findings remain even when the data were adjusted for differences in sampling effort. In contrast, BRUV recorded proportionally more mobile predators, and a more taxonomically distinct population, though only when taxonomic evenness was not taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Reserve Networks Conserve Biodiversity by Stabilizing Communities and Maintaining Food Web Structure
    Marine reserve networks conserve biodiversity by stabilizing communities and maintaining food web structure STEPHEN R. WING AND LUCY JACK Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, 310 Castle Street, Dunedin, New Zealand 9054 Citation: Wing, S. R., and L. Jack. 2013. Marine reserve networks conserve biodiversity by stabilizing communities and maintaining food web structure. Ecosphere 4(10):XXX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00257.1 Abstract. Theory predicts that networks of fully protected marine reserves conserve biodiversity by stabilising communities and maintaining food web structure in the face of inadequately constrained fishery exploitation. To test these ideas we examine trends in species incidence, community and trophic structure of temperate reef fishes over an eight year period within the Fiordland no-take marine reserve network, at management zones subject to commercial fishing and at those closed to commercial exploitation but open to recreational fishers. We use information from extensive stratified subtidal surveys of the reef fish community and abundance of macroalgae, as well as oceanographic data collected in 2002, 2006 and 2010. Our analyses indicate a regional decline in species richness of exploited reef fish in areas open to fishing between 2002 and 2010. Following implementation of spatial management (2006–2010), richness of ‘exploited’ species increased within marine reserves, but remained unchanged in areas open to fishing. Further, analysis of differences in community structure in this time period (2006–2010) indicate that both ‘exploited’ and ‘non-target’ groups were more stable within marine reserves than were those within fished areas. Consequentially average trophic level of the community remained stable within marine reserves but declined sharply in areas open to fishing, indicating both declines in large omnivorous species and increases in forage fish within exploited regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Species of the Families Labridae and Scaridae: an Update
    PARENTI & RANDALL Checklist of Labridae and Scaridae 29 Checklist of the species of the families Labridae and Scaridae: an update Paolo Parenti1 and John E. Randall2 1University of Milano–Bicocca, Department of Environmental Sciences, Piazza della Scienza, 1, 20126 Milano, Italy. Email: [email protected] 2Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817–2704, USA Email: [email protected] Recieved 7 July, accepted 1 October 2010 ABSTRACT. The checklist of the species of the RÉSUMÉ. Le répertoire des espèces des familles families Labridae and Scaridae is updated. des Labridae et des Scaridae est mis à jour. Après After the publication of the annotated checklist la publication du répertoire annoté (Parenti & (Parenti & Randall 2000) the species of Labridae Randall, 2000), les espèces Labridae ont augmenté increased from 453 to 504 and genera from 68 to 70, de 453 à 504 et les genres de 68 à 70, tandis que les whereas Scaridae increased from 88 to 99 species. Scaridae sont passées de 88 à 99 espèces. Altogether this account lists 53 species that are new Dans l’ensemble, ce comptage dénombre 53 espèces to science, while 14 species have been resurrected qui sont nouvelles à la science, tandis que 14 ont été from synonymy and 5 are now regarded as junior ressuscitées des synonymes et 5 sont actuellement synonyms. Comments on the status of 20 nominal considérées sous 5 nouveaux synonymes. Le species and notes on undescribed species are also répertoire comprend également des commentaires included. sur l’état de 20 espèces et des notes d’explication des espèces non encore décrites.
    [Show full text]