Nonlocal response of Mie-resonant particles

Daniel A. Bobylev,1 Daria A. Smirnova,2, 3 and Maxim A. Gorlach1 1Physics and Engineering Department, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg 197101, Russia 2Nonlinear Physics Centre, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 3Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Science, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia Mie-resonant high-index dielectric particles are at the core of modern all-dielectric photonics. In many situations, their response to the external fields is well-captured by the dipole model which neglects the excitation of higher-order multipoles. In that case, it is commonly assumed that the dipole moments induced by the external fields are given by the product of particle polarizability and the field in the particle center. Here, we demonstrate that the dipole response of non- spherical subwavelength dielectric particles is significantly more complex since the dipole moments are defined not only by the field in the particle center but also by the second-order spatial derivatives of the field. As we prove, such nonlocal response is especially pronounced in the vicinity of anapole minimum in the scattering cross-section. We examine the excitation of high-index dielectric disk in microwave domain and silicon nanodisk in near infrared applying group-theoretical analysis and retrieving the nonlocal corrections to the dipole moments. Extending the discrete dipole model to include nonlocality of the dipole response, we demonstrate an improved agreement with full-wave numerical simulations. These results provide important insights into meta- of Mie-resonant non-spherical particles as well as metamaterials and metadevices based on them.

I. INTRODUCTION order of magnitude as the wavelength of at magnetic or electric dipole resonance2. Therefore, it is not obvious Over the recent years, all-dielectric nanophotonics and a priori that electric and magnetic dipole moments of an meta-optics1,2 have demonstrated a variety of exciting arbitrarily shaped particle are related only to the field in functionalities including strong directional scattering of the particle center. light3,4, flexible phase manipulation of the transmit- In this Article, we assess this important assumption ted signal with transparent metasurfaces5, high-quality and reveal that the dipole moments of the typical Mie- modes of dielectric particles6, enhanced nonlinear phe- resonant disk are governed not only by electric and mag- nomena in the arrays of resonant nanoparticles7,8 and netic fields in its center but also by their second-order precise molecular fingerprinting with all-dielectric meta- spatial derivatives which crucially determine the electro- surfaces9. The physics underlying this plethora of effects magnetic response of the disk in the vicinity of anapole is based on the combination of electric and magnetic re- minimum18 in the scattering cross-section. To high- sponses of dielectric particles10–12, where optical mag- light that the discussed physics is universally valid across netic response is associated with circular displacement the entire electromagnetic spectrum, we examine two currents excited in the scatterer. representative examples: dielectric disk made of high- A key theoretical tool to capture electromagnetic be- ceramics with resonances in the microwave havior of subwavelength objects is multipole expansion13 domain and silicon nanodisk supporting Mie resonances which presents the field scattered by the particle as a sum in the near infrared. In both cases, we focus on the of different multipoles, each of them being characterized frequency range where electric and magnetic dipole re- by the unique set of and angular dependence sponses provide the dominant contribution to the scatter- of the radiation pattern. In many situations, the domi- ing cross-section separating them from the contributions nant contribution to the scattering cross-section of sub- of higher-order multipoles via multipole decomposition wavelength particles is provided by the lowest-order mul- technique. tipoles, namely, magnetic and electric dipoles, while the Furthermore, we extend the discrete dipole model by contribution of higher-order multipoles can be neglected. incorporating the dependence of the dipole moments on In that case, the physics of complex particle arrays spatial derivatives of the fields and demonstrate an im- arXiv:2001.11731v2 [physics.optics] 15 Jul 2020 can be efficiently explored using the discrete dipole proved accuracy of such approach compared to the con- model14–17. In this approach, the scatterer is viewed as ventional discrete dipole approximation. electric and magnetic dipoles placed in its center, while It should be stressed that our results are conceptu- all information on particle properties is embedded into ally different from the nonlocal effects in small metal- its electric and magnetic polarizability . These lic nanoparticles manifested via size-dependent resonance tensors link the external fields acting on the particle to shifts and linewidth broadening19,20. The latter effects its dipole moments and can be retrieved from full-wave occurring due to electron-electron interactions are en- numerical simulations. hanced as the size of plasmonic nanoparticle decreases. However, dielectric particles used in experimentally In stark contrast, the mechanism we discuss here becomes relevant situations are not that deeply subwavelength, increasingly important as the size of the particle grows and the diameter of the particle has typically the same becoming of the same order of magnitude as the wave- 2 length at the dipole resonance. Kronecker symbols δij and even powers of n vector di- The rest of the article is organized as follows. In rected along the disk axis. Besides that, αij and γijlm Section II we construct a general relation between the are symmetric with respect to the first pair (i, j) of the 25 dipole moment of the particle from one side and inci- indices due to symmetry of kinetic coefficients ; γijlm is dent field with its spatial derivatives from the other us- also symmetric with respect to the last pair (l, m) of the ing the symmetry arguments. To support our analysis indices. The above requirements yield: further, in Sec. III we consider a dielectric disk made of high-permittivity ceramics in the microwave domain αij = α1 δij + α2 ninj , (3) and a nanodisk made of crystalline silicon in the near γijlm = γ1 δij nlnm + γ2 (ninl δjm + njnm δil infrared. The parameters of both particles are chosen in +n n δ + n n δ ) + γ n n n n (4) such a way that the dipole response dominates the rest j l im i m jl 3 i j l m of multipole contributions in a sufficiently wide frequency +γ4 δijδlm + γ5 (δilδjm + δimδjl) + γ6 ninjδlm , range. Performing full-wave numerical simulations of the disks’ dipole response, we reveal the conditions for the where α1,2 and γ1−6 are some unknown scalar coefficients strongest nonlocal effects. Focusing on the case of ce- which depend on the material and shape of the particle ramic disk, we extract the components of polarizability and the frequency of excitation. tensors as well as the nonlocal corrections to the induced Combining Eqs. (3), (4) with Eqs. (1), (2), we derive dipole moments. Section IV continues with the discus- the expression for the dipole moment of the disk: sion of the generalized discrete-dipole model which in- 2 corporates nonlocal corrections to the dipole moments di = α⊥ε0 Ei + (αk − α⊥)ni ε0 Ez + γ1 ε0 Eikz and enables an increased accuracy in the description of 2 +2γ2kikz ε0 Ez + γ3ni ε0 Ezk , (5) meta- composed of such Mie-resonant disks. Fi- z nally, Sec. V concludes with a summary and an outlook where we take into account that |k| = k0 = ω/c and for future studies. k · E = 0 since the incident field satisfies the condi- tion div E = 0. α⊥ and αk are the standard frequency- dependent components of polarizability tensor of an II. SYMMETRY ANALYSIS OF THE DISK 2 anisotropic particle defined as α⊥ = α1 + γ4 k0 and RESPONSE 2 αk = α⊥ + α2 + γ6 k0. Similar equation holds for the magnetic dipole moment: In the most general scenario, electric and magnetic dipole moments d and m of the particle induced by the (m) (m) (m) (m) 2 mi = α⊥ Hi + (αk − α⊥ )niHz + γ1 Hikz impinging plane wave can be presented as Taylor series (m) (m) 2 with respect to wave vector k: +2γ2 kikz Hz + γ3 niHzkz . (6)

di = ε0 {αij Ej + βijl Ejkl + γijlm Ejklkm + ... } , (1) Quite importantly, if the particle is spherical and has (m) (m) (m) full rotational symmetry, the only nonzero components of mi = αij Hj + βijl Hjkl + γijlmHjklkm + ..., (2) the tensors Eqs. (3), (4) are α1, γ4 and γ5, which ensures that the link between the dipole moment and the field −iω t where SI system of units and e time convention are remains local. th n used. n terms of both expansions scale as (R/λ) rel- In the case of a disk, second-order nonlocal corrections ative to the respective leading-order terms, where R is to the dipole moment of the particle are captured by the particle characteristic size and λ is the wavelength. the three additional terms proportional to γ1, γ2 and γ3. Therefore, assuming that the particle is subwavelength, Note that all of them exhibit characteristic dependence we keep only the first three terms in Eqs. (1), (2). on the direction of the incident wave propagation since Note that in the analysis below we define the dipole they depend on kz. Based on this observation, we con- moment based on the angular dependence of the fields, sider the geometry illustrated in Fig. 1. consistently with Refs.21,22. In the alternative formula- 23,24 TE-polarized wave [Fig. 1(a)] excites dy, mx and mz tions of multipole expansion , however, thus defined components of the dipole moments given by the equations di and mi correspond to the sum of dipole moment, toroidal moment and higher-frequency contributions. 2 2  (m) dy = α⊥ + γ1k0 cos θ ε0 E0 , (7) Tensors βijl and β describe bianisotropic response ijl n (m) (m) 2 of the particle being zero for any inversion-symmetric mx = − α⊥ − 2γ2 k0 cos θ configuration including the case of the disk. Further-   o + γ(m) + 2γ(m) k2 cos3 θ H , (8) more, D∞h symmetry group of the disk ensures that the 1 2 0 0 tensors α , α(m) and γ , γ(m) have two and six in- nh   i ij ij ijlm ijlm m = α(m) + γ(m) + 2γ(m) + γ(m) k2 sin θ dependent components, respectively, which strongly sim- z k 1 2 3 0   o plifies the analysis (see the details in Appendix A). Due − γ(m) + 2γ(m) + γ(m) k2 sin3 θ H , (9) to symmetry, these tensors can be constructed only from 1 2 3 0 0 3

(2.2 ÷ 2.9) GHz are well-separated from the higher-order multipole resonances. Furthermore, 2R/λ ≈ 0.24 in the E E chosen frequency range, which means that the size of the H disk is of the same order of magnitude as wavelength. Examining the response of the disk to the incident k k TE-polarized plane wave [geometry Fig. 1(a), θ = π/2], H we recover a single characteristic peak in the scattering cross-section at frequencies around 2.4 GHz [Fig. 2(a)]. x x

z z

FIG. 1. Excitation of the disk by the incident plane wave. (a) TE-polarized excitation which induces dy, mx and mz components of dipole moments; (b) TM-polarized excitation (a) which induces dx, dz and my components of dipole moments.

whereas TM-polarized excitation [Fig. 1(b)] results in dx, dz and my components of the dipole moments: (b)  (m) (m) 2 2  my = α⊥ + γ1 k0 cos θ H0 , (10)  2 dx = α⊥ − 2γ2k0 cos θ 2 3 + (γ1 + 2γ2) k0 cos θ ε0 E0 , (11)   2 dz = − αk + (γ1 + 2γ2 + γ3) k0 sin θ 2 3 + (γ1 + 2γ2 + γ3) k0 sin θ ε0 E0 . (12) Hence, all relevant coefficients can be extracted by fitting the dependence of dipole moments on the incidence angle θ of the plane wave. It should be stressed that the symmetry analysis above (c) is fully general and not limited only to the propagating fields. To capture the nonlocal response of the disk to the arbitrary excitation, we replace kn by −i ∂n in Eqs. (5)- (6), which yields:

∂2E d = α ε E + (α − α )n ε E − γ ε i (d) i ⊥ 0 i k ⊥ i 0 z 1 0 ∂z2 2 2 ∂ Ez ∂ Ez −2γ2ε0 − γ3niε0 2 , (13) ∂xi∂z ∂z ∂2H m = α(m)H + (α(m) − α(m))n H − γ(m) i i ⊥ i k ⊥ i z 1 ∂z2 2 2 (m) ∂ Hz (m) ∂ Hz −2γ2 − γ3 ni 2 . (14) ∂xi∂z ∂z

III. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE FIG. 2. Scattering spectra of the disk illuminated by the plane NONLOCAL RESPONSE wave propagating along x axis in geometry of Fig. 1. Solid line shows the total scattering cross-section, red dashed and blue dot-dashed curves show the contribution of electric and mag- As experimentally relevant examples of cylindrical netic dipoles, respectively. (a,b) Results for ceramic disk with particles we consider two cases. The first one corre- permittivity ε = 39+0.078 i, radius R = 14.55 mm and height sponds to the disk made of high-permittivity ceramics h = 11.61 mm. (c,d) Results for nanodisk made of crystalline ε = 39 + 0.078 i with radius R = 14.55 mm and height silicon with radius R = 242 nm and height h = 220 nm. (a,c) h = 11.61 mm close to the values used in the recent TE-polarized plane wave excitation with electric field along y experiments26. Chosen parameters ensure that electric axis. (b,d) TM-polarized plane wave excitation with electric and magnetic dipole resonances residing in the range field along z axis. 4

Multipole analysis of the scattered field reveals the dom- terers, we examine their excitation by TE-polarized plane inant contribution of electric dipole, while the contribu- wave for the two incidence angles: θ = 0 and θ = π/2. tions from magnetic dipole and from higher-order multi- Naively, one would expect that the dipole moments dy(0) poles are strongly suppressed. This means that the inci- and dy(π/2) induced by the impinging wave should be the dent field excites in-plane electric dipole resonance of the same since Ey component of the incident field does not disk. Note also that the scattering spectrum has a pro- depend on the incidence angle. Therefore, the difference nounced minimum at frequencies around 2.5 GHz, which |dy(π/2)−dy(0)| provides a direct measure of nonlocality corresponds to the so-called anapole. [cf. Eq. (7)]. First, we investigate the spectral dependence of this TM-polarized excitation [geometry Fig. 1(b), θ = π/2] quantity [Fig. 3(a,d)]. Our simulations suggest that thus gives rise to the two scattering peaks [Fig. 2(b)]: one defined nonlocality reaches its maximal value at the fre- around 2.4 GHz with the dominant contribution of in- quency close to the anapole minimum in the scattering plane magnetic dipole and another one around 2.8 GHz spectra [Fig. 2(a,c)]. We associate such behavior with corresponding to z-oriented electric dipole. The contri- strong suppression of local dipole response at the fre- bution of higher-order multipoles to the scattering cross- quency of anapole when nonlocal effects become espe- section in the frequency range (2.20÷2.75) GHz is below 2 2 cially pronounced. 4 cm and 0.25 cm for TE- and TM-polarized excita- Next we fix the wavelength of excitation to the value tions, respectively. Hence, the dipole model is clearly favouring the strongest nonlocal response and exam- adequate in this case. ine the dependence of the induced dipole moment dy As a second example of a cylindrical scatterer, we con- on cosine of the incidence angle, cos θ. In agreement sider a nanodisk made of crystalline silicon with radius with Eq. (7), this dependence is well-fitted by parabola R = 242 nm and height h = 220 nm as in the recent [Fig. 3(b,c,e,f)]. Furthermore, even zeroth-order approx- R experiments4. Such disk supports dipole resonances in imation to the dipole moment d0 = P dV (P is electric the near infrared spectral range: (200 ÷ 275) THz so polarization) exhibits the characteristic dependence on that the particle size is also comparable to wavelength: the incidence angle. At the same time, it strongly de- 2R/λ ≈ 0.38. Since the of silicon is viates from the full dipole moment defined according to lower than that of microwave ceramics, the relative spec- Refs.21,22. Moreover, in the case of ceramic disk, the tral separation of Mie resonances is smaller. Neverthe- second-order approximation to the full dipole moment less, the dipole response of the disk dominates at wave- Z 2 Z lengths 1.2 < λ < 1.5 µm featuring the same struc- ω  2  d2 = P dV − 2r P − (r · P) r dV (15) ture of the scattering peaks as its microwave counterpart 10 c2 [Fig. 2(c,d)]. also deviates from the exact result quite significantly de- To quantify the nonlocal dipole response of both scat- spite the subwavelength size of the particle.

on the incidence angle θ, we retrieve all components of TABLE I. Polarizabilities and non-local parameters for ce- the particle polarizability tensor and associated nonlocal ramic disk at wavelength λ = 12.3 cm corrections as further discussed in Appendix B. For clar- Parameter Electric response Magnetic response ity, we focus on the case of a ceramic disk in which case 3 the applicability of the dipole model is the most appar- α⊥, cm −73.73 + 57.26 i −48.31 + 117.74 i 3 ent. The extracted parameters are presented in Table I. αk, cm 18.26 + 2.46 i −15.11 + 1.69 i 5 Using the retrieved data, we check that the developed γ1, cm 147.31 − 103.21 i 7.34 − 17.98 i 5 model captures the response of the disk not only to the γ2, cm −76.37 + 53.91 i −8.24 + 20.13 i propagating plane waves, but also to the evanescent near 5 γ3, cm 10.33 − 3.67 i 7.87 − 22.04 i fields. To this end, we simulate the excitation of ceramic disk by a point electric dipole placed above the disk as The obtained results clearly indicate that the response illustrated in Fig. 4(a) and oscillating at the same wave- of the disk is beyond the simplified model based on local length λ = 12.3 cm matching to electric anapole. In this polarizability tensors and the nonlocal corrections to the geometry, the field produced by the dipole at point r dipole moment provide a sizeable contribution to the to- reads tal scattering cross-section at least in a certain frequency ext 1 ˆ(ee) range. E (r) = G (L zˆ + r) d0 , (16) 4π ε0 Similarly to the dipole moment dy, we extract the rest of the dipole moments excited in the disk by the incident where Gˆ(ee) is the dyadic Green’s function describing the TE or TM-polarized plane waves in geometry of Fig. 1. electric field produced by point electric dipole andz ˆ is a Fitting the obtained dependence of the dipole moments unit vector along z axis. Using Eq. (13), it is straightfor- 5

(a) (b) (c) Ceramic disk

(d) (e) (f) Silicon nanodisk

FIG. 3. Dipole response of ceramic (a-c) and crystalline silicon (d-f) disks to the incident TE-polarized plane wave. (a,d) Spectral dependence of the nonlocal response quantified by the difference of the induced electric dipole moments |dy(π/2) − dy(0)| for the two incidence angles θ = 0 and θ = π/2. Red dashed line marks the frequency in the vicinity of electric anapole favouring the strongest nonlocal response. (b,c,e,f) Dependence of real (b,e) and imaginary (c,f) parts of induced dipole moment dy on cos θ at wavelength (b,c) λ = 12.3 cm; (e,f) λ = 1.18 µm. Black solid curve (ED) corresponds to the exact dipole moment 21,22 R calculated according to Refs. . Red dashed line depicts the conventional dipole moment (ED0) defined as d = P dV . Blue dot-dashed line shows dipole moment ED2 calculated by Eq. (15) incorporating the toroidal correction. All calculated dipole moments exhibit the dependence on the incidence angle. ward to evaluate the induced in IV. DESCRIBING THE RESPONSE OF the disk: META-CRYSTALS

Since the developed model of the disk nonlocal re- ∂2Eext ∂2Eext ext y z sponse includes only few extra parameters, it can be read- dy = α⊥ ε0Ey − γ1 ε0 2 − 2γ2 ε0 . (17) ∂z ∂y∂z ily applied to describe the clusters composed of such disks as well as metasurfaces. First we examine a relatively simple case when the incident plane wave with the wave- The obtained results are shown by the red dashed line in length λ = 12.3 cm scatters on a dimer composed of the Fig. 4(b,c). At the same time, the prediction of the local two identical disks [Fig. 5(a)]. To describe such system, model obtained by neglecting the nonlocal corrections is we write down the self-consistent equations for the dipole shown in Fig. 4(b,c) by the blue dot-dashed curve. We moments of the disks taking into account their mutual observe a discrepancy between the two approaches ev- interaction. Once the dipole moments of the disks are ident at small distances L < λ, when the gradients of found, the scattered radiation and the scattering cross- the field affecting the disk are especially large. To com- section can be readily evaluated. The predictions of local pare the two approaches, we extract the dipole moment and nonlocal models are depicted in Fig. 5(b) showing of the disk dy directly from the full-wave numerical sim- a significant discrepancy. Comparing these results with ulations as shown by the black solid curve in Fig. 4(b,c). full-wave numerical simulations, we observe that the non- It is clearly seen that the nonlocal model perfectly agrees local model fits numerical results much better. Neverthe- with full-wave simulations even at small distances. less, slight discrepancies are present. 6

d0 (a) H E

L k y y x z (a) z a (b)

(b)

(c) H x E k y z a a

(c) (d)

FIG. 4. Excitation of the disk by a point electric dipole d0 placed at the symmetry axis of the disk. (a) Excitation ge- ometry. (b,c) Real and imaginary parts of the dipole moment dy induced in the disk versus distance L between point elec- tric dipole d0 and the disk center. Black solid line shows the results of full-wave numerical simulations carried on in Comsol Multiphysics software package. Blue dot-dashed and red dashed curves show the predictions of local and nonlocal models calculated using the extracted values of polarizability. FIG. 5. (a) Excitation of a pair of ceramic disks by the plane wave at normal incidence. (b) Scattering cross-section on a dimer versus distance a between the disks. Blue dot-dashed and red dashed curves show the predictions of local and non- The reason for such discrepancies is related to the near- local models, respectively. Black solid line shows the results field interaction of the disks. Even though higher-order of full-wave numerical simulations. (c) Excitation of a meta- multipoles are off-resonant at wavelength of interest, gra- surface based on the square lattice of ceramic disks with the dients of the near fields do excite such multipoles. As a period a by the plane wave at normal incidence. (d) The de- consequence, higher-order multipoles provide a contribu- pendence of metasurface transmittance on the period a. Blue tion to the scattering cross-section which is especially dot-dashed and red dashed curves show the predictions of lo- pronounced for small distances a. cal and nonlocal models, respectively. Black solid line shows Having tested our approach on a simple problem of a the results of full-wave numerical simulations. dimer, we now switch to more interesting scenario of a metasurface based on the square lattice of ceramic disks 7 with the period a [Fig. 5(c)]. For simplicity, we focus on The most involved part of this calculation is the eval- the geometry of normal incidence, in which case only dy uation of the lattice sums governing the interaction of and mx components of the dipole moments are excited. the particles within the metasurface, and this part is dis- The developed model suggests that the dipole moments cussed in Appendix C. are defined by the local fields acting on the disks: Calculated results for metasurface transmittance are presented in Fig. 5(d). The nonlocal model perfectly ∂2E ∂2E d = α ε E − γ ε y − 2γ ε z , (18) matches the results of full-wave numerical simulations y ⊥ 0 y 1 0 ∂z2 2 0 ∂y ∂z once the period of the metasurface a is larger than ∂2H ∂2H (8 ÷ 9) cm, i.e. exceeds the diameter of the disk approxi- m = α(m) H − γ(m) x − 2γ(m) z . (19) x ⊥ x 1 ∂z2 2 ∂x ∂z mately three times. For shorter distances, the agreement becomes worse, which is related to the intrinsic limita- The local fields are in turn presented as a superposition tions of the discrete dipole model and agrees with the 28 of the incident fields Ein, Hin and the fields scattered by other studies . Similarly to the case of dimer, this dis- the rest of the particles in the array: crepancy is associated with the excitation of higher-order multipoles in the disk by the gradients of the near fields. iqz 1 (ee) Z0 (em) Ey = Ein e + Gkyy dy + Gkyx mx , (20) 4π ε0 4π c 1 H = −H eiqz + G(me) d + G(mm) m , (21) V. DISCUSSION AND OUTLOOK x in 4π kxy y 4π kxx x 1 (ee) Z0 (em) In summary, we have investigated dipole response Ez = Gkzy dy + Gkzx mx , (22) 4π ε0 4π of Mie-resonant non-spherical particles in the region of c 1 H = G(me) d + G(mm) m . (23) crossover from R/λ  1 to R/λ ∼ 1, which is the case z 4π kzy y 4π kzx x for experimentally relevant situations. As we have proved p for the case of dielectric disks, induced dipole moments Here, Z0 = µ0/ε0 is the free space impedance and are determined not only by the fields in the particle cen- (αβ) Gkij are lattice sums which describe the field produced ter but also by the second-order spatial derivatives of the by all particles of the array except of the given one: fields, which gives rise to nonlocality of the particle dipole response. We have also demonstrated that the predicted (αβ) X (αβ) ik·rmn Gkij = Gij (−rmn) e , (24) nonlocal effects are especially pronounced in the vicinity (m,n)6=(0,0) of anapole minimum in the scattering spectrum reaching up to 50% of local response thereby largely governing where k denotes an in-plane wave vector, G is the dyadic light scattering in this frequency range. Green’s function, (i, j) are its Cartesian components, and While the developed model includes only few extra pa- the upper indices α and β indicate the type of the dyadic rameters describing the nonlocal effects, it captures the Green’s function, for instance, (ee) and (em) stand for response of the disk not only to the propagating plane electric field produced by electric and magnetic dipoles, waves but also to the evanscent fields. Moreover, our ap- respectively. proach is applicable also to the metamaterials and meta- Combining Eqs. (18)-(23), we derive the expressions for surfaces composed of Mie-resonant scatterers, providing the dipole moments. Taking into account that the lattice an improved accuracy in comparison with the standard sums containing z-derivatives of the odd order vanish and discrete dipole approximation. (mm) (ee) Gˆ = Gˆ , we calculate the dipole moments of the As we prove, our results are universally valid across particles: the entire electromagnetic spectrum, being applicable not

2 only in the microwave domain but also at infrared and dy = (α⊥ + γ1 q ) ε0 Ein× visible frequencies. The approach developed here can be  α γ ∂2G γ ∂2G −1 directly generalized to the cases of less symmetric parti- 1 − ⊥ G + 1 kyy + 2 kzy , (25) 4π kyy 4π ∂z2 2π ∂y ∂z cles or larger scatterers when higher-order spatial deriva- tives of the field should be taken into account. Moreover, (m) (m) 2 mx = −(α⊥ + γ1 q ) Hin× our analysis can be also applied to the case of higher-  αm γm ∂2G γm ∂2G −1 order multipole moments, for instance, electric and mag- 1 − ⊥ G + 1 kxx + 2 kzx , (26) netic quadrupoles. 4π kxx 4π ∂z2 2π ∂x ∂z Nonlocality of the dipole response provides an interest- where the upper (ee) index of the Green’s functions is ing perspective on spatial dispersion effects in metama- terials, which are normally described via the expansion suppressed throughout for brevity. The transmitted field 29–31 is obtained by summing the far fields produced by all of permittivity tensor in powers of the wave vector . particles comprising the metasurface27: In the previous microscopic descriptions, nonlocality in metamaterials has been linked to the interaction of reso- i q nant scatterers with each other28,32,33. Now it is apparent Et = Ein + 2 (dy − mx/c) . (27) 2ε0 a that this picture should be supplemented by the nonlocal 8 response of the individual particle. tensors αij and γijlm correspond to the tensor products Finally, we believe that our findings provide valuable D⊗D and D⊗D⊗D⊗D, respectively, where D matrices insights into meta-optics and all-dielectric nanophoton- realize E1u(Πu) representation of DNh symmetry group. ics by highlighting truly nonlocal behavior of their basic However, constructed matrix representations should also building blocks — Mie-resonant nanoparticles. be symmetric with respect to the interchange of indices Note added in proof. Recently, we became aware of a i, j and l, m. Hence, we should construct symmetrized complementary investigation of retardation effects in the matrices of representation dipole response of nanostructures34. 1 D¯ 0 0 (R) = [D 0 D 0 + D 0 D 0 ] , (A1) ij,i j 2 ii jj ij ji ¯ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dijlm,i0j0l0m0 (R) 1 = [Dii0 Djj0 Dll0 Dmm0 + Dij0 Dji0 Dll0 Dmm0 (A2) We acknowledge Pavel Belov and Kseniia Barysh- 4 nikova for valuable discussions. Theoretical models were +Dii0 Djj0 Dlm0 Dml0 + Dij0 Dji0 Dlm0 Dml0 ] . supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 20-72-10065), numerical simulations were supported The respective characters of these symmetrized represen- by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant tations are calculated as: No. 18-32-20065). M.A.G. acknowledges partial support 1 χ¯(R) = χ2(R) + χ(R2) , (A3) by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoreti- 2 cal Physics and Mathematics “Basis”. D.A.S. acknowl- 1  4 2 2 2 2  edges support by the Australian Research Council (grant χ˜(R) = χ (R) + 2 χ (R) χ(R ) + χ (R ) . (A4) 4 DE190100430). Clearly,χ ¯ andχ ˜ calculated for Cϕ and i Cϕ depend on ϕ, but in our analysis we are interested in the values of these Appendix A: Symmetry analysis of the disk dipole characters averaged over ϕ; these values are provided in response the fifth and sixth lines of Table II. Finally, we can determine the number of independent In this Appendix, we calculate the number of indepen- components of the tensors under consideration by cal- culating the number of times that unity representation dent components of the tensors αij and γijlm that enter Eq. (1) applying group-theoretical arguments35. We as- enters the constructed symmetrized representations: sume D∞h symmetry group of the particle and take into 1 X account symmetry of the tensors with respect to permu- ν(α) = Nk χ¯(Ck) = 2 , (A5) 4 N tation of i, j and l, m indices. First, we notice that the vectors d, E and k transform according to E1u(Πu) representation of D∞h symmetry 1 X ν(γ) = N χ˜(C ) = 6 . (A6) group. To simplify our analysis, we consider finite DNh 4 N k k group setting N → ∞ at later steps. This group includes rotations around vertical z axis by angles ϕn = 2π n/N, Hence, αij and γijlm tensors contain two and six in- where n = 0 ... (N − 1), further denoted as Cϕ; rotations dependent components, respectively, as indicated in the 0 article main text. by π around N horizontal symmetry axes of polygon, C2; all previous symmetry transformations followed by spa- 0 tial inversion, i Cϕ and i C2. Note that identity element Appendix B: Retrieving the nonlocal corrections to is contained in Cϕ with ϕ = 0. The characters of all these the particle polarizability tensor transformations for E1u(Πu) representation are provided in the third line of Table II. Without additional constraints, representations of the Developing the retrieval procedure for the nonlocal dipole response of the disk, we focus on the case of ce- ramic disk, since in this case the dipole resonances are well-isolated spectrally. We fix excitation wavelength to TABLE II. Character table for E1u(Πu) representation of λ = 12.3 cm which corresponds to the excitation fre- D symmetry group in 3D case Nh quency f = 2.44 GHz and vary the incidence angle θ 0 0 R Cϕ C2 i Cϕ i C2 studying the geometry Fig. 1. Using multipole decompo- 21,22 Nk NNNN sition technique , we evaluate complex amplitudes of χ(R) 1 + 2 cos ϕ -1 −1 − 2 cos ϕ 1 the disk dipole moments for both polarizations of excita- χ(R2) 1 + 2 cos 2ϕ 3 1 + 2 cos 2ϕ 3 tion as a function of θ. Setting the phase of the incident hχ(R)i 2 2 2 2 wave to zero in the disk center, we plot real and imagi- ϕ nary parts of the retrieved dipole moments for TE and hχ˜(R)i 8 4 8 4 ϕ TM-polarized excitations in Fig. 6. 9

(a) (d)

(b) (e)

(c) (f)

FIG. 6. Real and imaginary parts of dipole moments induced by the incident TE- (a,b,c) and TM- (d,e,f) polarized plane wave as a function of the incidence angle θ in geometry of Fig. 1. (a) Electric dipole, y-component. (b) Magnetic dipole, x-component. (c) Magnetic dipole, z-component. (d) Magnetic dipole, y-component. (e) Electric dipole, x-component. (f) Electric dipole, z-component.

Dipole moment dy induced by TE-polarized plane wave as a fingerprint of “magnetic” nonlocalities. However, features strong dependence on the incidence angle shown they appear to be significantly smaller than their elec- in Fig. 6(a). Since the disk is non-bianisotropic, this tric counterparts which is explained by the choice of the dipole moment arises purely due to the electric field E. frequency. For instance, tuning the excitation frequency However, y projection of the electric field does not de- to the so-called magnetic anapole when magnetic dipole pend on the incidence angle θ and therefore the results radiation is cancelled, one can expect a substantial en- of simulations clearly show that the response of the disk is hancement of “magnetic” nonlocalities. indeed beyond the simplified model based on local polar- The rest of dipole moments [Fig. 6(b,c,e,f)] feature al- izability tensors. Moreover, the dipole moment changes most linear dependence on cos θ or sin θ with relatively by more than 50% when the incidence angle is varied from small deviations in agreement with Eqs. (8)-(12). To pro- 0 to π/2 which hints towards strong nonlocal response at vide more comprehensive picture, we fit the simulation the chosen frequency. data by Eqs. (7)-(12), extracting the relevant parame- Somewhat similar situation is observed for TM- ters: 5 for electric and 5 for magnetic dipole response of the disk. Calculated results are presented in Table I. polarized excitation, when induced magnetic moment my also depends on the incidence angle [Fig. 6(d)], serving Chosen frequency close to the resonance for in-plane 10 magnetic dipoles gives rise to a quite large imaginary Appendix C: Lattice sums for the metasurface (m) part of magnetic polarizability α⊥ . Real parts of po- (m) (m) (m) In this Appendix, we discuss the calculation of the two- larizabilities αk , α⊥ and α⊥ appear to be negative, since the considered frequency 2.44 GHz is higher than dimensional lattice sums necessary to evaluate the trans- the resonance frequencies for z-oriented magnetic dipole mission and reflection coefficients for a metasurface at or in-plane dipoles. At the same time, the frequency of normal incidence within generalized discrete dipole ap- 36 excitation is below the resonance frequency for z-oriented proach. We employ the technique based on Poisson summation formula, extending it to calculate the sum of electric dipole, which ensures that the real part of αk is positive. the spatial derivatives of the Green’s function. 36 The sum Gkxx has been calculated in Ref. and for e−iω t time convention is given by the formula:

∗ ∗ ∗ Gkxx = 4π (A1 + A2a + A2b) , (C1) ∞ 1 X (2i q a + 3) m + 2 A = e−iq m a cos(k m a) 1 π a3 m3 (m + 1) (m + 2) x m=1 1 + −(iq a + 1) t2 ln t+ + t2 ln t− + 2 eiqa cos k a − 2iq a t ln t+ + t ln t− + (7i q a + 3) , (C2) 4π a3 + − x + − ∞ X p2 X A = − m K (p a n) cos(k a n) , (C3) 2a π a 0 m y Re pm6=0 n=1   2 2 2 3     X pm  1 (2ky − pm) a a a|pm| ia  A2b = − 2 + ζ(3) 3 + ln + 2 a q 2 2 8 π π 4π 2 Re pm=0  ky + pm 

2 ∞ " 2 2 3 # X p X 1 1 a (2ky − pm) a − m + − − . (C4) 2 p 2 2 p 2 2 3 3 2 a (ky + 2π n/a) + p (ky − 2π n/a) + p π n 8π n Re pm=0 n=1 m m

p 2 2 Here pm = (kx + 2πm/a) − q . If Re pm 6= 0, we choose + sign in front of the square root, otherwise we calculate p 2 2 ± −i(q±kx) a pm as i q − (kx + 2πm/a) . Square roots comprising Eq. (C4) are understood in the same way. t = 1−e , i(q±kx) a t± = 1 − e . In the case of normal incidence kx = ky = 0. The series A1 includes the fields of dipoles oriented along x axis and has a power-law convergence. The series A2a (A2b) are associated with the evanescent (propagating) fields produced by the rest of the particles and feature exponential (power-law) convergence. Overall, Eqs. (C1)-(C4) are quite suitable for rapid numerical calculations. 2 2 To calculate the derivative ∂ Gkxx/∂z we introduce the nonzero z coordinate of the observation point and take the second derivative of the lattice sum Gkxx with respect to z. The result reads:

∂2G kxx = 4π (B∗ + B∗ + B∗ ) , (C5) ∂z2 1 2a 2b q2 B = − t2 ln t+ − t + t2 ln t− − t − 1 1 4π a3 + + − − ∞ 1 X  3 3iq a q2 a2 (3m + 2)  + cos (k m a) e−iq m a − − + , (C6) π a5 x m5 m4 m3 (m + 1) (m + 2) m=1 ∞ 3 X X p K1(pm a n) B = m cos(k a n) , (C7) 2a π a2 n y Re pm6=0 n=1 p3 ∞ cos(k a n)  r π  3 15  X m X y −pm a n B2b = 2 K1(pm a n) − e 1 + − 2 π a n 2 pm a n 8 pm a n 128 (pm a n) Re pm=0 n=1 11

X p4  1 + √ m (polylog (3/2, r ) + polylog (3/2, r )) (C8) 3/2 + − 8π a (pm a) Re pm=0 3 15  + (polylog (5/2, r ) + polylog (5/2, r )) − (polylog (7/2, r ) + polylog (7/2, r )) , 5/2 + − 7/2 + − 8 (pm a) 128 (pm a) where the same designations are used, r± = exp(−pm a ± iky a) and polylog function is defined as:

∞ X zn polylog (a, z) = . na n=1 In a similar way we calculate another derivative of the lattice sum:

∂2 G kyz = C + C + C , (C9) ∂y ∂z 1 2a 2b iq3  iq3 5q2  C = − −τ ln τ + − τ ln τ − + 2 + − τ 2 ln τ + − τ + τ 2 ln τ − − τ − 1 1 a2 + − 2 a2 2 a3 + + − − ∞ ∞ ∞ 2iq3 X ρn + ρn 5 q2 X (ρn + ρn ) (3n + 2) X 12 (iq n a − 1) − + − + + − + (ρn + ρn ) , (C10) a2 n2 (n + 1) (n + 2) a3 n3 (n + 1) (n + 2) n5 a5 + − n=1 n=1 n=1 ∞ 4 X X cos(kx m a) C = κ (k(n))2 K (m a κ ) , (C11) 2a a m a n y 1 n Re κn6=0 m=1 √ 2 (n) 2  X 2πκ (ky ) 1 C = n (polylog (3/2, s ) + polylog (3/2, s )) 2b 3/2 + − a (κn a) Re κn=0 3 15  + (polylog (5/2, s ) + polylog (5/2, s )) − (polylog (7/2, s ) + polylog (7/2, s )) 5/2 + − 7/2 + − 8 (κn a) 128(κn a) 4 ∞ cos k m a  r π  3 15  X X (n) 2 x −κn m a + κn (ky ) K1(κn m a) − e 1 + − 2 , (C12) a m a 2 κn m a 8 κn m a 128 (κn m a) Re κn=0 m=1 q i(q±ky ) a ± −i(q±ky ) a (n) (n) 2 2 where ρ± = e , τ = 1 − ρ±, τ± = 1 − e , ky = 2π n/a + ky, κn = (ky ) − q . If Re κn 6= 0, q 2 (n) 2 we choose + sign in front of the square root. Otherwise, if Re κn = 0, we calculate κn as −i q − (ky ) . s± = e−κn a±ikx a. 2 2 2 2 Note that in the geometry of normal incidence (kx = ky = 0) Gkyy = Gkxx, ∂ Gkyy/∂z = ∂ Gkxx/∂z , 2 2 ∂ Gkyz/(∂y ∂z) = ∂ Gkxz/(∂x ∂z) due to D4 symmetry of a metasurface. Hence, only three independent lattice sums have to be evaluated.

1 A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, 4 M. Decker, I. Staude, M. Falkner, J. Dominguez, D. N. Y. S. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk, Optically resonant di- Neshev, I. Brener, T. Pertsch, and Y. S. Kivshar, High- electric nanostructures, Science 354, aag2472 (2016). Efficiency Dielectric Huygens’ Surfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 2 S. Kruk and Y. Kivshar, Functional Meta-Optics and 3, 813 (2015). Nanophotonics Governed by Mie Resonances, ACS Pho- 5 S. Kruk, B. Hopkins, I. I. Kravchenko, A. Miroshnichenko, tonics 4, 2638 (2017). D. N. Neshev, and Y. S. Kivshar, Broadband highly effi- 3 I. Staude, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. Decker, N. T. Fofang, cient dielectric metadevices for polarization control, APL S. Liu, E. Gonzales, J. Dominguez, T. S. Luk, D. N. Ne- Photonics 1, 030801 (2016). shev, I. Brener, and Y. Kivshar, Tailoring Directional Scat- 6 M. V. Rybin, K. L. Koshelev, Z. F. Sadrieva, K. B. Samu- tering through Magnetic and Electric Resonances in Sub- sev, A. A. Bogdanov, M. F. Limonov, and Y. S. Kivshar, wavelength Silicon Nanodisks, ACS Nano 7, 7824 (2013). High-Q Supercavity Modes in Subwavelength Dielectric 12

Resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 243901 (2017). distribution, Opt. Express 23, 33044 (2015). 7 M. R. Shcherbakov, D. N. Neshev, B. Hopkins, A. S. 22 R. Alaee, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, An Shorokhov, I. Staude, E. V. Melik-Gaykazyan, M. Decker, electromagnetic multipole expansion beyond the long- A. A. Ezhov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, I. Brener, A. A. wavelength approximation, Opt. Commun. 407, 17 (2018). Fedyanin, and Y. S. Kivshar, Enhanced Third-Harmonic 23 A. B. Evlyukhin, T. Fischer, C. Reinhardt, and B. N. Generation in Silicon Nanoparticles Driven by Magnetic Chichkov, Optical theorem and multipole scattering of Response, Nano Lett. 14, 6488 (2014). light by arbitrarily shaped nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B 94, 8 K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, J.-H. Choi, 205434 (2016). A. Bogdanov, H.-G. Park, and Y. Kivshar, Subwavelength 24 E. A. Gurvitz, K. S. Ladutenko, P. A. Dergachev, A. B. dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics, Science Evlyukhin, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and A. S. Shalin, The 367, 288 (2020). High-Order Toroidal Moments and Anapole States in All- 9 A. Tittl, A. Leitis, M. Liu, F. Yesilkoy, D.-Y. Choi, D. N. Dielectric Photonics, Laser Photonics Rev. 13, 1800266 Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, and H. Altug, Imaging-based molec- (2019). ular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces, Sci- 25 L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part ence 360, 1105 (2018). 1 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980). 10 A. B. Evlyukhin, S. M. Novikov, U. Zywietz, R. L. Erik- 26 A. A. Gorlach, D. V. Zhirihin, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, sen, C. Reinhardt, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, and B. N. Chichkov, A. B. Khanikaev, and M. A. Gorlach, Photonic Jackiw- Demonstration of Magnetic Dipole Resonances of Dielec- Rebbi states in all-dielectric structures controlled by bian- tric Nanospheres in the Visible Region, Nano Lett. 12, isotropy, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205122 (2019). 3749 (2012). 27 P. A. Belov and C. R. Simovski, Boundary conditions for 11 A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, Y. H. Fu, J. Zhang, interfaces of electromagnetic crystals and the generalized and B. Luk’yanchuk, Magnetic light, Sci. Rep. 2, 492 Ewald-Oseen extinction principle, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045102 (2012). (2006). 12 D. Smirnova and Y. S. Kivshar, Multipolar nonlinear 28 A. V. Chebykin, M. A. Gorlach, and P. A. Belov, Spatial- nanophotonics, Optica 3, 1241 (2016). dispersion-induced in metamaterials with cu- 13 J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New bic symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045127 (2015). York, 1998). 29 V. M. Agranovich and V. L. Ginzburg, Optics with 14 E. M. Purcell and C. R. Pennypacker, Scattering and ab- Spatial Dispersion and Excitons (Springer, Berlin, 1984). sorption of light by nonspherical dielectric grains, The As- 30 M. G. Silveirinha, Metamaterial homogenization approach trophysical Journal 186, 705 (1973). with application to the characterization of microstructured 15 B. T. Draine, The discrete-dipole approximation and its composites with negative parameters, Phys. Rev. B 75, application to interstellar graphite grains, The Astrophys- 115104 (2007). ical Journal 333, 848 (1988). 31 K. Mnasri, A. Khrabustovskyi, C. Stohrer, M. Plum, and 16 M. A. Yurkin and A. G. Hoekstra, The discrete dipole C. Rockstuhl, Beyond local effective material properties approximation: An overview and recent developments, J. for metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 97, 075439 (2018). Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 106, 558 (2007). 32 M. G. Silveirinha, Generalized Lorentz-Lorenz formulas 17 A. B. Evlyukhin, C. Reinhardt, and B. N. Chichkov, Mul- for microstructured materials, Phys. Rev. B 76, 245117 tipole light scattering by nonspherical nanoparticles in the (2007). discrete dipole approximation, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235429 33 M. A. Gorlach and P. A. Belov, Effect of spatial dispersion (2011). on the topological transition in metamaterials, Phys. Rev. 18 K. V. Baryshnikova, D. A. Smirnova, B. S. Luk’yanchuk, B 90, 115136 (2014). and Y. S. Kivshar, Optical Anapoles: Concepts and Ap- 34 A. Patoux, C. Majorel, P. R. Wiecha, A. Cuche, O. L. plications, Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801350 (2019). Muskens, C. Girard, and A. Arbouet, Polarizabilities of 19 S. Raza, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, M. Wubs, and N. A. Mortensen, complex individual dielectric or plasmonic nanostructures, Nonlocal optical response in metallic nanostructures, J. Phys. Rev. B 101, 235418 (2020). Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 183204 (2015). 35 M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group 20 C. David and F. J. G. de Abajo, Spatial Nonlocality in the Theory. Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter Optical Response of Metal Nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. (Springer, Berlin, 2008). C 115, 19470 (2011). 36 P. A. Belov and C. R. Simovski, Homogenization of electro- 21 I. Fernandez-Corbaton, S. Nanz, R. Alaee, and C. Rock- magnetic crystals formed by uniaxial resonant scatterers, stuhl, Exact dipolar moments of a localized electric current Phys. Rev. E 72, 026615 (2005).