MWD-75-47 Controls on Use of Psychotherapeutic Drugs And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MWD-75-47 Controls on Use of Psychotherapeutic Drugs And ‘ REPORT TO THE CONGRESS Controls On Use Of Psychotherapeutic Drugs And Improved Psychiatrist Staffing Are Needed In Veterans Administration Hospitals b BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES MWDJ5-47 APRIL18,19?'5 t COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STAlES WASHINGTON. D.C. 21XI48 B-i33044 .To the Presid-ent of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives We reviewed psychiatric treatment at Veterans Adminis- tration hospitals and found a need for (1) controls to insure appropria-te use of psychotherapeuticdrugs and (2) improved psychiatrist staffing. Our review was made pursuant to the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. 53), and the Accounting and Auditing Act 0.f 1950 (31 U.S.C. 67). We are sending copies of this report to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. Comptroller General of the United States . I” n Contents -- Page DIGEST i CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Use of psychotherapeutic drugs 1 Side effects of psychotherapeutic drugs 2 Scope of review 3 CLOSERMONITORING NEEDED TO PRECLUDE OVERUSEOF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTICDRUGS 4 Drugs used in excess of recommended maximum doses 5 Simultaneous use of more than one psychotherapeutic drug 7 Possible overuse of drugs to treat Parkinson's disease symptoms 10 Frequency of administering psycho- therapeutic drugs 13 Inadequate use of drug holidays 16 Actions taken by hospital officials as a result of our findings 18 Conclusions 18 Recommendations 19 Agency comments and our evaluation 19 3 STAFFING OF PSYCHIATRIC WARDSIN VA HOSPITALS 23 Conclusions 25 Agency comments 25 APPENDIX I Letter dated February 7, 1975, from the Deputy Administrator of Veterans Affairs 27 II Drugs and recommended maximum daily dosages ,36 III Letters da,ted February 5, 1974; Febru- ary 20, 1974; and April 23, 1974, from three VA hospital officials 39 and in some cases delusions and hallucina- , tions. Mood changes include inappropriate emotional responses and loss of empathy. Withdrawn, regressive, and bizarre behavior may be noted. /’ . ,; ,’ ,. * I, ‘. ‘, ,, COMPTROLLER GENERAL'S CONTROLS ON USE OF REPORT TO THE CONGRESS PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGS AND IMPROVED PSYCHIATRIST STAFFING ARE NEEDED IN VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITALS -------DIGEST WHY THE REVIEW WAS MADE results and implications of current medical research on Because of the important role these drugs. drugs have in the care of the Veterans Administration's GAO prepared drug profiles on (VA's) psychiatric patients, 6,171 psychiatric patients. GAO souQht to determine if VA The profiles included infor- had established proper con- mation on the type of drug trols over the use of psycho- or drugs being taken, length therapeutic drugs and whether of time they had been taken, other improvements might be dosages, and frequency with needed. which they were being admin- istered. (See p. 4.) VA estimated that during fis- cal year 1976 the average Using the drug profiles, GAO daily number of mentally ill found that in many instances patients in its hospitals psychotherapeutic drugs were will total about 26,000 and not being used as recommended the cost of providing care by authoritative medical ref- will be about $518 million. erences. VA officials were generally un- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS aware that the drugs were not being administered in accord- i ante with these references. Medical authorities agree that psychotherapeutic drugs Officials of three hospitals are beneficial in treating advised GAO that actions would certain psychiatric patients. be taken to monitor the pre- They have cautioned, however, scribing of drugs so that ad- that prolonged or improper justments could be made when use of these drugs can be conditions warranted. ( See detrimental. p. 18.) VA should establish a system VA has had problems recruiting to inform its officials about enough physicians to treat psy- $ whether psychotherapeutic chiatric patients, many of the j drugs are being properly physicians assigned to treat used. VA also needs an ef- such patients had no formal fective system for dissemi- psychiatric training, and the nating to its physicians number of patients for which JSheet. Upon removal, the report MWD-75-47 cover date should be noted hereon. i a physician was responsible Simultaneous *--use of varied widely. (See p. 23.) Ke than-- one drug Numerous studies, including Drugs used in excess of some by VA, have concluded -Zazurn recommended - dosage that little evidence exists to support simultaneous use The proper dosage of a psy- of more than one psychother- chotherapeutic drug varies apeutic drug on the same pa- with the individual patient. tient--a practice commonly A physician must consider referred to as polypharmacy. several factors, including the patient’s weight, sever- These studies have shown that ity and type of illness, and polypharmacy increases the tolerance level, in deter- possibility of adverse reac- mining the proper dosage. tions and have suggested that Medical authorites generally it be avoided if possible. agree that dosages above the (See p. 7.) recommended maximum may cre- ate an unacceptable risk of The drug profiles for the 6,171 toxicity and may fail to pro- patients showed that 2,002, or vide a substantial additional about 32 percent, were being therapeutic effect. (See given more than one psychother- P* 5.1 apeutic drug simultaneously. Many were taking more than two A comparison of drug profiles drugs simultaneously. ( See with maximum recommended dos- pp. 7 and 8.) ages showed that 631 of the 6,171 patients, or about 10 A disparity also existed in percent, were receiving dos- the use of polypharmacy among ages in excess of the recom- wards of the same hospital 0 mended daily maximums. Some wards at almost every hos- pital had no patients receiving The average percentage of more than one psychotherapeutic patients taking more than the drug; however, every hospital recommended dosage in the 13 had at least one ward in which hospitals visited by GAO polypharmacy was practiced to ranged from 4 to 23. ( See a considerable extent, ( See P* 5.1 PO 9.1 GAO also noted a wide dispar- Use of drugs to treat ity in the number of patients Parkinson’s dzgexe svmntoms receiving more than the maxi- mum recommended dosage among One possible side effect of wards of the same hospital. the class of psychotherapeutic In some wards more than 40 drugs known as antipsychotic percent of the patients were is the inducement of Parkin- receiving dosages in excess son’s disease symptoms--but not of the recommended maximums. the disease itself. Drugs used ii to treat these symptoms are A wide disparity also existed commonly referred to as anti- in the number of drugs admin- Parkinson drugs. istered three or more times daily for more than 6 months Studies conducted of antipar- among hospitals and among kinson drugs have concluded wards within a hospital. that they (1) should not be used preventively or routine- --Use of drug ----_-holidays ly and (2) can usually be c discontinued after about 3 According to studies, includ- months because the symptoms ing some by VA, a majority of usually disappear by then. chronic schizophrenics--con- stituting a large portion of Of the 1,645 patients taking psychiatric patients in VA antiparkinson drugs: hospital s-- who are stabilized on doses of antipsychotic --42 percent appeared to be drugs can receive no medica- taking them routinely. tion for 2 or 3 days a week (drug holidays) without sub- --37 percent had been taking stantial clinical change, them for longer than 3 months. (See p. 10.) Drug holidays are feasible be- cause these psychotherapeutic A wide disparity also existed drugs are stored in various among hospitals in the use of body tissues and released over antipar kinson drugs. Routine a period of days or weeks. use of antiparkinson drugs (See pe 16.) ranged from 28 percent at one hospital to 54 percent at GAO’s analysis of the drug data another. suggested that drug holidays were not being used to the ex- tent possible. In 6 of the 13 Frequency of administering ---- . -- hospitals, no patients were on ----cychotherapeutic -----drugs drug holiday schedules. About 90 percent of all the patients VA studies state that VA ad- on drug holidays were from ministers many psychothera- three hospitals. (See p. 17.) peutic drugs to patients three or more times daily. Staffing problems----- These studies recommend I however, that,. after some VA has had problems recruiting degree of control over the enough physicians to provide patient’s condition has care to psychiatric patients. been obtained (one noted VA Many of its physicians assigned psychopharmacologist has to provide psychiatric care suggested that this may take have had no formal psychiatric 3 to 6 months), the drug be training, and the number of pa- administered only once or tients for which a physician twice daily. (See p. 13.) was responsible varied widely. iii One hospital had 1 physician --Establish a uniform drug for every 21 patients.; anoth- utilization review system er had 1 physician for every to provide management with 100 patient,s. The overall information on whether psy- ratio was 1 for 53. chotherapeutic drugs are being used in accordance Considering only the psychia- with the guidelines. trists who were certified or eligible to become certified --Require hospitals using (physicians who specialize in psychotherapeutic drugs to psychiatry) by the American implement the drug utiliza- Board of Psychiatry and Neu- tion review system. rology, GAO found that the ratio ranged from 1 psychia- --Design an effective, ongoing trist for every 24 patients educational program to dis- to 1 for 399. (See p. 23.) seminate to hospital person- nel the results and implica- VA officials and hospital tions of current medical psychiatrists identified the research on psychotherapeutic following problems as ones drugs.
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Molecular Determinants of Ligand Selectivity for the Human Multidrug And Toxin Extrusion Proteins, MATE1 and MATE-2K Bethzaida Astorga, Sean Ekins, Mark Morales and Stephen H Wright Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA (B.A., M.M., and S.H.W.) Collaborations in Chemistry, 5616 Hilltop Needmore Road, Fuquay-Varina NC 27526, USA (S.E.) Supplemental Table 1. Compounds selected by the common features pharmacophore after searching a database of 2690 FDA approved compounds (www.collaborativedrug.com). FitValue Common Name Indication 3.93897 PYRIMETHAMINE Antimalarial 3.3167 naloxone Antidote Naloxone Hydrochloride 3.27622 DEXMEDETOMIDINE Anxiolytic 3.2407 Chlordantoin Antifungal 3.1776 NALORPHINE Antidote Nalorphine Hydrochloride 3.15108 Perfosfamide Antineoplastic 3.11759 Cinchonidine Sulfate Antimalarial Cinchonidine 3.10352 Cinchonine Sulfate Antimalarial Cinchonine 3.07469 METHOHEXITAL Anesthetic 3.06799 PROGUANIL Antimalarial PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE 100MG 3.05018 TOPIRAMATE Anticonvulsant 3.04366 MIDODRINE Antihypotensive Midodrine Hydrochloride 2.98558 Chlorbetamide Antiamebic 2.98463 TRIMETHOPRIM Antibiotic Antibacterial 2.98457 ZILEUTON Antiinflammatory 2.94205 AMINOMETRADINE Diuretic 2.89284 SCOPOLAMINE Antispasmodic ScopolamineHydrobromide 2.88791 ARTICAINE Anesthetic 2.84534 RITODRINE Tocolytic 2.82357 MITOBRONITOL Antineoplastic Mitolactol 2.81033 LORAZEPAM Anxiolytic 2.74943 ETHOHEXADIOL Insecticide 2.64902 METHOXAMINE Antihypotensive Methoxamine
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn Et Al
    US 2004O224012A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0224012 A1 Suvanprakorn et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 11, 2004 (54) TOPICAL APPLICATION AND METHODS Related U.S. Application Data FOR ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING LIPOSOME MACRO-BEADS (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/264,205, filed on Oct. 3, 2002. (76) Inventors: Pichit Suvanprakorn, Bangkok (TH); (60) Provisional application No. 60/327,643, filed on Oct. Tanusin Ploysangam, Bangkok (TH); 5, 2001. Lerson Tanasugarn, Bangkok (TH); Suwalee Chandrkrachang, Bangkok Publication Classification (TH); Nardo Zaias, Miami Beach, FL (US) (51) Int. CI.7. A61K 9/127; A61K 9/14 (52) U.S. Cl. ............................................ 424/450; 424/489 Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT Eric G. Masamori 6520 Ridgewood Drive A topical application and methods for administration of Castro Valley, CA 94.552 (US) active agents encapsulated within non-permeable macro beads to enable a wider range of delivery vehicles, to provide longer product shelf-life, to allow multiple active (21) Appl. No.: 10/864,149 agents within the composition, to allow the controlled use of the active agents, to provide protected and designable release features and to provide visual inspection for damage (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 and inconsistency. US 2004/0224012 A1 Nov. 11, 2004 TOPCAL APPLICATION AND METHODS FOR 0006 Various limitations on the shelf-life and use of ADMINISTRATION OF ACTIVE AGENTS USING liposome compounds exist due to the relatively fragile LPOSOME MACRO-BEADS nature of liposomes. Major problems encountered during liposome drug Storage in vesicular Suspension are the chemi CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER cal alterations of the lipoSome compounds, Such as phos APPLICATIONS pholipids, cholesterols, ceramides, leading to potentially toxic degradation of the products, leakage of the drug from 0001) This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143)
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143) David Beattie, Governor-General Order in Council At the Government House at Wellington this 5th day of June 1984 Present: His Excellency the Governor-General in Council Pursuant to section 105 of the Medicines Act 1981, and, in the case of Part 3 of the regulations, to section 62 of that Act, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Minister of Health tendered after consultation with the organisations and bodies that ap- peared to the Minister to be representatives of persons likely to be substantially affected, and by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title and commencement 5 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Medicines Regulations 1984 1 July 2014 2 Interpretation 5 Part 1 Classification of medicines 3 Classification of medicines 11 Part 2 Standards 4 Standards for medicines, related products, medical 11 devices, cosmetics, and surgical dressings 5 Pharmacist may dilute medicine in particular case 12 6 Colouring substances [Revoked] 12 Part 3 Advertisements 7 Advertisements not to claim official approval 13 8 Advertisements for medicines 13 9 Advertisements for related products 15 10 Advertisements for medical devices 15 11 Advertisements
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You w ill find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Tariff - Schedule
    CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE 99 - i Chapter 99 SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION PROVISIONS - COMMERCIAL Notes. 1. The provisions of this Chapter are not subject to the rule of specificity in General Interpretative Rule 3 (a). 2. Goods which may be classified under the provisions of Chapter 99, if also eligible for classification under the provisions of Chapter 98, shall be classified in Chapter 98. 3. Goods may be classified under a tariff item in this Chapter and be entitled to the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff or a preferential tariff rate of customs duty under this Chapter that applies to those goods according to the tariff treatment applicable to their country of origin only after classification under a tariff item in Chapters 1 to 97 has been determined and the conditions of any Chapter 99 provision and any applicable regulations or orders in relation thereto have been met. 4. The words and expressions used in this Chapter have the same meaning as in Chapters 1 to 97. Issued January 1, 2020 99 - 1 CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE Tariff Unit of MFN Applicable SS Description of Goods Item Meas. Tariff Preferential Tariffs 9901.00.00 Articles and materials for use in the manufacture or repair of the Free CCCT, LDCT, GPT, UST, following to be employed in commercial fishing or the commercial MT, MUST, CIAT, CT, harvesting of marine plants: CRT, IT, NT, SLT, PT, COLT, JT, PAT, HNT, Artificial bait; KRT, CEUT, UAT, CPTPT: Free Carapace measures; Cordage, fishing lines (including marlines), rope and twine, of a circumference not exceeding 38 mm; Devices for keeping nets open; Fish hooks; Fishing nets and netting; Jiggers; Line floats; Lobster traps; Lures; Marker buoys of any material excluding wood; Net floats; Scallop drag nets; Spat collectors and collector holders; Swivels.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Unknown Screening for Drugs and Toxic Compounds in Human Serum
    A General Unknown Screening for Drugs and Toxic Compounds in Human Serum Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the University of Basel, Switzerland for the Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Ph. D. Degree by Stefan Sturm from Biel (BE) Basel, 2005 Accepted by the faculty of natural sciences On proposal of Prof. Dr. Hauser Prof. Dr. Eberle Prof. Dr. Drewe Dr. Scholer Basel, 20. September 2005 Prof. Dr. Wirz Dean Table of Content 1. List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................5 2. Summary.........................................................................................................7 3. Introduction.....................................................................................................9 3.1. GENERAL UNKNOWN SCREENING ............................................................................................. 9 3.2. CHOICE OF SPECIMEN .............................................................................................................. 10 3.3. EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES ...................................................................................................... 10 3.3.1. Liquid-Liquid Extraction .................................................................................................. 10 3.3.2. Solid-Phase Extraction...................................................................................................... 11 3.4. CHROMATOGRAPHY ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Roots of Empathy Program on the Use of Psychotropic Medications Among Youth in Manitoba
    The effect of the Roots of Empathy program on the use of psychotropic medications among youth in Manitoba by Lindsey Dahl A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2017 by Lindsey Dahl Abstract Background: Psychotropic medications prescriptions to youth have increased. Roots of Empathy (ROE) is a social and emotional learning program that may influence the use of psychotropic medication. Methods: Administrative data was analyzed in a matched sample of children who received ROE during 2002/03 to 2012/13. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between ROE and psychotropic medication dispensations. Results: Few significant differences were observed. Children who received ROE in kindergarten to grade 3 had a lower adjusted hazard for an anxiolytic dispensation. Children who received ROE in grade 7 to 8 had a higher hazard for an antipsychotic dispensation. Males who received the program had an increased hazard for an antipsychotic dispensation. Conclusion: There was no consistent differences in the likelihood of being dispensed a psychotropic medication between children who received ROE and children who did not in Manitoba. ii Acknowledgments I would like to first thank my thesis advisor Dr. Randy Fransoo of the Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine at the University of Manitoba. Right from our initial meeting, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 36/84 (2006.01) A61K 31/5513 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/045 (2006.01) A61P 31/22 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A61K 31/522 (2006.01) A61K 45/06 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, PCT/NL20 14/050780 KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (22) International Filing Date: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, 13 November 2014 (13.1 1.2014) PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (25) Filing Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/903,430 13 November 2013 (13. 11.2013) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: RJG DEVELOPMENTS B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Col.V.MISSION of the EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
    COl.V.MISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES SEC(90) 1985 final· Brussels, 29 October 1990 Proposa I for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relat.ing to cosmetic products -2- EXPLANATORY UEUORANDUM 1. In the context of a people's Europe, the Commission attaches great Importance to simplifying and clarifying Community law so as to make It clearer and more accessible to the ordinary citizen, thus giving hIm new opportunItIes and the chance to make use of the spec if i c rights It gives him. This aim cannot be achieved so long as numerous provisions that have been amended several times, often QUite substantially, remain scattered, so that they must be sought partly In the original Instrument and partly In later amending ones. Considerable research work, comparing many different Instruments, Is thus needed to Identify the current rules. For this reason a consot tdatton of rules that have freQuently been amended Is essential If Community law Is to be clear and transparent. 2. In Its resolution of 26 November 1974 concerning consolidation of Its acts (1), the Council recommended that those of Its acts which have been amended several times be assembled Into a single text. It stressed that, In the Interests of legal certainty, a genuine legislative consolidation, Involving the repeal of earlier acts, should wherever possible be effected (as Is being done In this case). it conseQuently Invited the Commission to let it have proposals for consol !dation and undertook ·to examine them "as Quickly as possible, whltout bringing Into QUestion, during that consol ldatlon, the substantive solutions contained In the consol !dated texts".
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Feb 2010 Inclusion of Cobalt and 2019 Fei Prohibited
    APPENDIX 2 CLASSIFICATION OF PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES 1. This classification describes the types of Prohibited Substances and places same in specific categories. The list shall be published on the Club’s Notice Board. CLASS I Drugs that have the greatest pharmacological potential to affect the racing performance of a horse and which have no accepted medical use in a racehorse. These include substances which are potent stimulants of the Central Nervous System (CNS). Examples of drugs in this Class include, but are not limited to: Amphetamines, fentanyl, etorphine, cocaine, morphine, meperidine, opiates, opium derivatives, synthetic opiods, psychoactive drugs. CLASS II Drugs that have a high pharmacological potential for affecting the racing performance of a horse. These include: (i) substances which are pharmacologically active in altering the cons (ii) substances which are not generally accepted as therapeutic agents in the racing horse; and (iii) substances, some of which may have legitimate use in equine medicine but should not be found in the racing horse, such as injectable local anaesthetics. 1 Groups of drugs in this Class include, but are not limited to: (a) Opiate partial agonists, or agonistsantagonists; (b) Non-opiate psychotropic drugs, which may have stimulant, depressant, analgesic or neuroleptic effects; (c) Miscellaneous drugs which might have a stimulant effect on the CNS; (d) Drugs with prominent CNS depressant action; (e) Antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs, with or without prominent CNS stimulatory or depressant effects; (f) Muscle blocking drugs which have direct neuromuscular blocking action; (g) Local anaesthetics which have a reasonable potential for use as nerve blocking agents (except procaine); and (h) Snake venom and other biologic substances which may be used as nerve blocking agents.
    [Show full text]