DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pathology of the Ulnar Nerve in Acromegaly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pathology of the Ulnar Nerve in Acromegaly European Journal of Endocrinology (2008) 159 369–373 ISSN 0804-4643 CLINICAL STUDY The pathology of the ulnar nerve in acromegaly Alberto Tagliafico1, Eugenia Resmini2, Raffaella Nizzo3, Lorenzo E Derchi1, Francesco Minuto2, Massimo Giusti2, Carlo Martinoli1 and Diego Ferone2 Departments of 1Radiology ‘R’, DICMI, 2Endocrinological and Medical Sciences (DiSEM) and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research and 3Neurophysiology, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, I-16132 Genova, Italy (Correspondence should be addressed to D Ferone; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Context: Acromegalic patients may complain of sensory disturbances in their hands. Cubital tunnel syndrome, the ulnar nerve neuropathy at the cubital tunnel (UCT), in acromegalic patients has never been reported. Objective: To describe and assess the prevalence of UCT in acromegalic patients and the effects of 1 year of therapy on UCT. Patients: We examined prospectively 37 acromegalic patients with no history of polyneuropathy, acute trauma at the elbow, no diabetes or hypothyroidism with clinical examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), and high-resolution ultrasound (US). A control group was made by 50 volunteers. The local ethics committee approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Intervention: Clinical history, physical examination, NCS, and US were used to diagnose UCT at the beginning of the study and after 1 year. Results: In 8 of 37 patients, a diagnosis of UCT was made at the beginning of the study reflecting a prevalence of 21%. After 1 year, 5 of 8 (62.5%) patients reported clinical and NCS improvements and evident US reduction of nerve cross-sectional area (CSA; 16.7G2.9 mm2 vs 12.2G3.1 mm2; P!0.001). In 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients, the UCT was unchanged. Ulnar nerve CSA was significantly increased in acromegalic patients with UCT (16.7G2.9 mm2 vs 11.1G2.3 mm2; P!0.047). Conclusion: Ulnar neuropathy could occur in acromegalic patients and can improve in 62% of cases with disease control. Due to the different management and therapeutic approach, it would be important to make differential diagnosis between cubital and carpal tunnel syndrome in acromegaly. European Journal of Endocrinology 159 369–373 Introduction to ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow which may determine altered sensation in the little and ring fingers Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common complication and, in later stages, wasting of the small muscles of the of acromegaly occurring in 20–64% of patients at hand and of the ulnar-side forearm (4). UCT is often diagnosis (1, 2). Sensory disturbances in the hand of misdiagnosed and the adjunct of ultrasound (US) to acromegalic patients may derive from a generalized nerve electrodiagnostic tests increases the sensitivity of the swelling that involves the median nerve and the ulnar diagnosis to 98% (6). Differential diagnosis between CTS nerve (3). Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (cubital and UCT assumes clinical relevance due to the different tunnel syndrome, UCT) is the second most common management and therapeutic approach. Therefore, the peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome following CTS in aim of this study was to assess UCT in acromegalic patients the normal population. UCT is the cause of disability and at the baseline and after 1-year of treatment. pain for patients and, in extreme cases, may progress to loss of function of the hand (4). In the clinical practice, sensory disturbances typically affect acromegalic patients’ hands, but the majorityof investigations deal with median Materials and methods nerve involvement (1–5). In particular, Jenkins et al. elegantly demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging Patients that the predominate pathologic mechanism of median We prospectively evaluated 37 acromegalic patients (18 neuropathy in acromegaly seems to be edema of the females and 19 males, age range 18–79 years, disease perineural sheathes rather than increased volume of the duration range 1–15 years) and 50 healthy age-, sex-, and carpal tunnel contents (5). However, to the best of our body mass index-matched controls with no history of knowledge, in acromegaly little attention has been given polyneuropathy,acute trauma at the elbow, alcohol abuse, q 2008 European Society of Endocrinology DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0327 Online version via www.eje-online.org Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/27/2021 03:41:38AM via free access 370 A Tagliafico and others EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2008) 159 vitamin B12 deficiency, diabetes or hypothyroidism, with the ulnar nerve with a broadband (17-5 MHz) linear clinical examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), and array transducer. The adjunct of US to diagnose UCT US to identify the presence of ulnar neuropathy at the increases the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis elbow. In these patients, the diagnosis of acromegaly was reaching values of 98% and it is recommended by the based on established criteria (7). At the beginning of the latest developments in neurology (10). US criteria for study, 6 patients had a new diagnosis (de novo) and did not nerve identification were based on anatomical land- receive any previous treatment, 21 previously underwent marks and detection of the fascicular echotexture (11). transsphenoidal neurosurgery (10 of these were also A swollen and hypoechoic ulnar nerve with the loss of treated with somatostatin analogues), 9 underwent the fascicular pattern at the cubital tunnel and a primary medical therapy with somatostatin analogues, narrowing of the nerve as it entered the cubital tunnel and the remaining one underwent radiotherapy and were the US signs of ulnar entrapment at the elbow medical therapy with octreotide. Disease activity was (Fig. 1). Moreover, ulnar nerve cross-sectional area evaluated by growth hormone (GH) measurement during (CSA) was evaluated considering the threshold value for 2 oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the basal value of cubital tunnel syndrome to be an area of 7.5 mm (12). insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), and the patients were Patients with a diagnosis of UCT at the beginning of subdivided into three subgroups according to established the study were reevaluated after 1 year. criteria (7): controlled (nZ17), uncontrolled (nZ12), and partially controlled (nZ8) in whom a discrepancy among Laboratory assays GH during OGTT and basal IGF1 values was noted. The study was approved by the local ethics committee Circulating GH and IGF1 levels were determined as and written informed consent was obtained from all reported previously (13). patients and controls. Statistical analysis Clinical examination Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 During physical examination the following in each software (Chicago, Illinois, USA). Mann–Whitney U test patient were systematically assessed: was used for unpaired data to compare patients and 1) Pinprick sensation in the area of the ulnar digital, controls as well as patients’ groups. Wilcoxon signed- palmar cutaneous, and dorsal cutaneous sensory branches; ranks test for related samples was used for comparison of 2) strength of the first dorsal interosseous, abductor digiti the patient with UCT at the beginning of the study and ! minimi, flexor carpi ulnaris,andflexor digitorum profundus after 1 year. P values 0.05 were considered significant. muscles using the Medical Research Council rating scale; and 3) muscle bulk of the hypothenar and first interosseous space (6). Moreover, patients with clinical symptoms of CTS Results according to the American Academy of Neurology (8) were excluded from the follow-up. Clinical examination A total of 37 patients were evaluated. At the beginning of Neurophysiological examination the study, 13 acromegalic patients were asymptomatic Patients identified at physical examination with possible and 15 patients referred sensory disturbances related to UCT underwent NCS to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Motor nerve conduction velocities of the ulnar nerve were calculated from below the elbow to the wrist and along a more than 10 cm segment across the elbow. The median nerve was also evaluated to exclude a Martin– Gruber anastomosis. The diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow was made following the criteria of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine: absolute slow- ing of nerve conduction at the elbow, decreased conduction velocity of more than 10 m/s across the elbow, decreased amplitude of more than 20%, absence of sensory responses, or evidence of muscle atrophy (9). Figure 1 (a) Normal longitudinal 17-5 MHz US of the ulnar nerve at Ultrasonography the cubital tunnel in a normal subject. (b) Evidently enlarged and swollen ulnar nerve in a symptomatic acromegalic patient at the In order to increase the sensitivity of clinical exami- elbow. In this patient, the ulnar nerve CSA on short-axis plane was nation and electrodiagnostic tests (10), we evaluated 27 mm2 (the normal cut-off value is 7.5 mm2). www.eje-online.org Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/27/2021 03:41:38AM via free access EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2008) 159 Cubital tunnel in acromegaly 371 the median nerve, and so these patients were excluded. Concordance with clinical examination, NCS, The remaining nine patients (three de novo, two with and US uncontrolled acromegaly, one partially controlled, and three with controlled acromegaly) complained of sensory Based on the results of these three approaches, we diagnosed UCT in eight patients (Table 1). One patient disturbances (numbness and paresthesias) in the territory with sensory disturbances on the hand as a whole was of distribution of the ulnar nerve. Weakness or atrophy considered as a CTS with a ‘glove’ distribution of in first dorsal interosseous or abductor digiti minimi was paresthesias (14) and was excluded. We considered also noted in one of the nine patients. One of these nine the five patients with normal NCS and abnormal US as symptomatic patients had sensory disturbances in the having UCT because, especially in mild UCT, NCS may hand as a whole and has been excluded because NCS and be normal and US increases the sensitivity of electro- US identified a CTS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Occupational Therapy Guide for Entry
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Occupational Therapy Capstones Department of Occupational Therapy 2008 An Occupational Therapy Guide for Entry-Level Therapists not Specializing in the Treatment of Upper Extremity Dysfunction: Three Common Cumulative Trauma Injuries Ryan Edwards University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ot-grad Part of the Occupational Therapy Commons Recommended Citation Edwards, Ryan, "An Occupational Therapy Guide for Entry-Level Therapists not Specializing in the Treatment of Upper Extremity Dysfunction: Three Common Cumulative Trauma Injuries" (2008). Occupational Therapy Capstones. 57. https://commons.und.edu/ot-grad/57 This Scholarly Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Occupational Therapy at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occupational Therapy Capstones by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY GUIDE FOR ENTRY-LEVEL THERAPISTS NOT SPECIALIZING IN THE TREATMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION: THREE COMMON CUMULATIVE TRAUMA INJURIES by Ryan Edwards Advisor: Anne Haskins PhD, OTR/L A Scholarly Project Submitted to the Occupational Therapy Department of the University of North Dakota In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Occupational Therapy Grand Forks, North Dakota August 1, 2008 This Scholarly Project Paper, submitted by Ryan Edwards in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master’s of Occupational Therapy from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisor under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome)
    DISEASES & CONDITIONS Ulnar Nerve Entrapment at the Elbow (Cubital Tunnel Syndrome) Ulnar nerve entrapment occurs when the ulnar nerve in the arm becomes compressed or irritated. The ulnar nerve is one of the three main nerves in your arm. It travels from your neck down into your hand, and can be constricted in several places along the way, such as beneath the collarbone or at the wrist. The most common place for compression of the nerve is behind the inside part of the elbow. Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is called "cubital tunnel syndrome." Numbness and tingling in the hand and fingers are common symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome. In most cases, symptoms can be managed with conservative treatments like changes in activities and bracing. If conservative methods do not improve your symptoms, or if the nerve compression is causing muscle weakness or damage in your hand, your doctor may recommend surgery. This illustration of the bones in the shoulder, arm, and hand shows the path of the ulnar nerve. Reproduced from Mundanthanam GJ, Anderson RB, Day C: Ulnar nerve palsy. Orthopaedic Knowledge Online 2009. Accessed August 2011. Anatomy At the elbow, the ulnar nerve travels through a tunnel of tissue (the cubital tunnel) that runs under a bump of bone at the inside of your elbow. This bony bump is called the medial epicondyle. The spot where the nerve runs under the medial epicondyle is commonly referred to as the "funny bone." At the funny bone the nerve is close to your skin, and bumping it causes a shock-like feeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List for RMA425-2 As at 7 April 2020 Number
    ULNAR NEUROPATHY AT THE ELBOW RMA ID Reference List for RMA425-2 as at 7 April 2020 Number Addas BM (2012). Ulnar neuropathy caused by traumatic arterio-venous 63167 fistula following gunshot wound. Neurosciences, 17(2): 165-6. Al-Najjim M, Mustafa A, Fenton C, et al (2013). Giant solitary synovial osteochondromatosis of the elbow causing ulnar nerve neuropathy: a 81900 case report and review of the literature. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj, 8(1): 1. Altun Y, Aygun SM, Cevik MU, et al (2013). Relation between 63195 electrophysiological findings and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Neuroradiol, 40(4): 260-6. Aly AR, Rajasekaran S, Obaid H, et al (2013). Bilateral ulnar neuropathy 63758 at the elbow secondary to neuropathic arthropathy associated with syringomyelia. PM & R, 5(6): 533-8. Andersen JH, Frost P, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, et al (2012). Computer 81462 use and ulnar neuropathy: results from a case-referent study. Work, 41(Suppl 1): 2434-7. Babal JC, Mehlman CT, Klein G (2010). Nerve injuries associated with 81463 pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop, 30(3): 253-63. Balakrishnan A, Chang YJ, Elliott DA, et al (2012). Intraneural lipoma of 81901 the ulnar nerve at the elbow: A case report and literature review. Can J Plast Surg, 20(3): e42-3. Bales J, Bales K, Baugh L, et al (2012). Evaluation for ulnar neuropathy 81464 at the elbow in Ironman triathletes: physical examination and electrodiagnostic evidence. Clin J Sport Med, 22(2): 126-31. Balik G, Balik MS, Ustuner I, et al (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Perioperative Upper Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injury and Patient Positioning: What Anesthesiologists Need to Know
    Anaesthesia & Critical Care Medicine Journal ISSN: 2577-4301 Perioperative Upper Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injury and Patient Positioning: What Anesthesiologists Need to Know Kamel I* and Huck E Review Article Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, USA Volume 4 Issue 3 Received Date: June 20, 2019 *Corresponding author: Ihab Kamel, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple Published Date: August 01, 2019 University, MEHP 3401 N. Broad street, 3rd floor outpatient building ( Zone-B), DOI: 10.23880/accmj-16000155 Philadelphia, United States, Tel: 2158066599; Email: [email protected] Abstract Peripheral nerve injury is a rare but significant perioperative complication. Despite a variety of investigations that include observational, experimental, human cadaveric and animal studies, we have an incomplete understanding of the etiology of PPNI and the means to prevent it. In this article we reviewed current knowledge pertinent to perioperative upper extremity peripheral nerve injury and optimal intraoperative patient positioning. Keywords: Nerve Fibers; Proprioception; Perineurium; Epineurium; Endoneurium; Neurapraxia; Ulnar Neuropathy Abbreviations: PPNI: Perioperative Peripheral Nerve 2018.The most common perioperative peripheral nerve Injury; MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure; ASA CCP: American injuries involve the upper extremity with ulnar Society of Anesthesiology Closed Claims Project; SSEP: neuropathy and brachial plexus injury being the most Somato Sensory Evoked Potentials frequent [3,4]. In this article we review upper extremity PPNI with regards to anatomy and physiology, Introduction mechanisms of injury, risk factors, and prevention of upper extremity PPNI. Perioperative peripheral nerve injury (PPNI) is a rare complication with a reported incidence of 0.03-0.1% [1,2]. Anatomy and Physiology of Peripheral PPNI is a significant source of patient disability and is the Nerves second most common cause of anesthesia malpractice claims [3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Guidance
    CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME GUIDANCE Author Louise Ross ([email protected]) Organisation NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Created 15/04/2016 15:32:54 Modified 26/10/2016 16:17:15 Modified By Louise Ross This pathway can be viewed at http://www.ckp.scot.nhs.uk/Published/Viewer.aspx?id=1743 Copyright © NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde 2012. All rights reserved Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Guidance Author: Louise Ross CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME GUIDANCE AHP Exit/ Parallel Serious Red Flags Routes Pathology Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Post Operatively Mild - Moderate Signs Moderate - Severe Signs and and Symptoms Symptoms 1st Line Management Place on hold/ Review in 6/52 Discharge Escalate 2nd Line Management Review Discharge Escalate Surgical Opinion/ List for surgery Post Operative Key More Infomation Decision Discharge Intervention Red Flag Self-Management Default Page 1/9 Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Guidance Author: Louise Ross GENERAL RELATED INFORMATION FOR PATHWAY Copyright Information Copyright © NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 2013-2016, All rights reserved Page 2/9 Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Guidance Author: Louise Ross SPECIFIC RELATED INFORMATION FOR PATHWAY SECTIONS RED FLAGS Pathways Related pathway: MSK Foot and Ankle Red Flags NHSGGC SERIOUS PATHOLOGY Pathways Related pathway: Serious Pathology AHP EXIT/ PARALLEL ROUTES Pathways Related pathway: exit routes x 6 CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME Information Description Cubital tunnel syndrome occurs due to compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. It is the second most common nerve compression and causes para/anaesthesia of the little and ulnar half of the ring finger with weakness of small muscles of the hand and/or the thumb.
    [Show full text]
  • Csph0114 V1 Nov19 Ulnar Nerve A4.Pmd
    What is an Ulnar Nerve Entrapment? Ulnar nerve entrapment occurs when the ulnar nerve in the arm becomes compressed or irritated. The ulnar nerve is one of the three main nerves in your arm. It travels from your neck down into your hand and can be constricted in several places along the way, such as underneath the collarbone or at the wrist. The most common place for compression of the nerve is the inside of the elbow. Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is called “cubital tunnel syndrome.” In many cases of cubital tunnel syndrome, the exact cause is not known. The ulnar nerve is especially vulnerable to compression at the elbow because it must travel through a narrow space with very little soft tissue to protect it. Diagram with the permission of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) What are the symptoms? • Aching pain on the inside of the elbow. Most of the symptoms, however, occur in your hand. • Numbness and tingling in the ring finger and little finger are common. Often, these symptoms come and go. They happen more often when the elbow is bent, such as when driving or holding the phone. Some people wake up at night because their fingers are numb. • Weakening of the grip and difficulty with finger coordination (such as typing or playing an instrument) may occur. • In later stages, the numbness is constant and the hand becomes weaker. There may be a visible loss of muscle bulk in severe cases, particularly noticeable on the back of the hand between the thumb and first finger, with loss of strength and dexterity Who gets it? People that have: • Prior fracture or dislocations of the elbow • Bone spurs/ arthritis of the elbow • Swelling of the elbow joint • Cysts near the elbow joint • An occupation or activities that require the elbow to be bent or flexed Leaflet No: csph0114 v1 Review Date 11/19 Page 1 of 2 Things that can help relieve the symptoms Rest and activity modification - Overuse of the affected hand and elbow can often result in an increase in your symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Nerve Disorders
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES PND Imaging Policy Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020 eviCore healthcare Clinical Decision Support Tool Diagnostic Strategies: This tool addresses common symptoms and symptom complexes. Imaging requests for individuals with atypical symptoms or clinical presentations that are not specifically addressed will require physician review. Consultation with the referring physician, specialist and/or individual’s Primary Care Physician (PCP) may provide additional insight. CPT® (Current Procedural Terminology) is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association (AMA). CPT® five digit codes, nomenclature and other data are copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. No fee schedules, basic units, relative values or related listings are included in the CPT® book. AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. AMA assumes no liability for the data contained herein or not contained herein. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. PND Imaging Guidelines V1.0 Peripheral Nerve Disorders (PND) Imaging Guidelines Abbreviations for Peripheral Nerve Disorders Imaging Guidelines 3 PN-1: General Guidelines 4 PN-2: Focal Neuropathy 5 PN-3: Polyneuropathy 7 PN-4: Brachial Plexus 8 PN-5: Lumbar and Lumbosacral Plexus 9 PN-6: Muscle Disorders 10 PN-7: Magnetic Resonance Neurography (MRN) 13 PN-8: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) 14 PN-9: Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (PNST) 15 PN-10: Nuclear Imaging 16 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroanatomy for Nerve Conduction Studies
    Neuroanatomy for Nerve Conduction Studies Kimberley Butler, R.NCS.T, CNIM, R. EP T. Jerry Morris, BS, MS, R.NCS.T. Kevin R. Scott, MD, MA Zach Simmons, MD AANEM 57th Annual Meeting Québec City, Québec, Canada Copyright © October 2010 American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine 2621 Superior Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 Printed by Johnson Printing Company, Inc. AANEM Course Neuroanatomy for Nerve Conduction Studies iii Neuroanatomy for Nerve Conduction Studies Contents CME Information iv Faculty v The Spinal Accessory Nerve and the Less Commonly Studied Nerves of the Limbs 1 Zachary Simmons, MD Ulnar and Radial Nerves 13 Kevin R. Scott, MD The Tibial and the Common Peroneal Nerves 21 Kimberley B. Butler, R.NCS.T., R. EP T., CNIM Median Nerves and Nerves of the Face 27 Jerry Morris, MS, R.NCS.T. iv Course Description This course is designed to provide an introduction to anatomy of the major nerves used for nerve conduction studies, with emphasis on the surface land- marks used for the performance of such studies. Location and pathophysiology of common lesions of these nerves are reviewed, and electrodiagnostic methods for localization are discussed. This course is designed to be useful for technologists, but also useful and informative for physicians who perform their own nerve conduction studies, or who supervise technologists in the performance of such studies and who perform needle EMG examinations.. Intended Audience This course is intended for Neurologists, Physiatrists, and others who practice neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and electrodiagnostic medicine with the intent to improve the quality of medical care to patients with muscle and nerve disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulnar Neuropathy
    Ulnar neuropathy Introduction The nerves of our body are its' 'electrical wires.' As such, they are insulated with a thin fatty material called myelin. Among the many functions of nerves, there are two that are obvious: (1) they carry electrical impulses from the brain and spinal cord to make muscles contract, and (2) they carry impulses back from the skin to the brain, so we can feel. The longest nerves in the body are those that carry electrical impulses up and down from the toes to the spinal cord; on average these are more than 40 inches (100 cm) long. Those that reach the fingers are only slightly shorter. The three major nerves of the arm are the median, the ulnar, and the radial. The second concept to understand is that the nerves, when running from the spinal cord to the ends of the toes (or fingers), follow a very complex path, between and/or under muscle fibers and tendons (which are like gristle), and often inside a fibrous tunnel. These tunnels are usually situated at the joints of the body, so that the stretching of the nerve across the joint as it bends or straightens is protected by the tunnel. The diagram below is from a very old anatomy text, yet it is a great illustration of the complex path that the nerves must follow as they course down the limbs. Mechanisms However, there are also places where a nerve may be very superficial (just under the skin) and the two best examples are (1) on the outside of the leg, just below the knee , where the common peroneal nerve runs from behind the knee around the head of the fibula bone, and (2) the ulnar nerve at the elbow, which can also be easily felt, especially in a thin person.
    [Show full text]
  • CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME I. Background the Ulnar Nerve
    CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME I. Background The ulnar nerve originates from the C8 and T1 spinal nerve roots and is the terminal branch of the medial cord of the brachial plexus. The ulnar nerve travels posterior to the medial epicondyle of the humerus at the elbow and enters the cubital tunnel. After exiting the cubital tunnel, the ulnar nerve passes between the humeral and ulnar heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle and continues distally to innervate the intrinsic hand musculature. Ulnar nerve compression occurs most commonly at the elbow. At the elbow, ulnar nerve compression has been reported at five sites: the arcade of Struthers, medial intermuscular septum, medial epicondyle/post-condylar groove, cubital tunnel and deep flexor pronator aponeurosis. The most common site of entrapment is at the cubital tunnel. Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow may have multiple causes, including: A. chronic compression B. local edema or inflammation C. space-occupying lesion such as a tumor or bone spur D. repetitive elbow flexion and extension E. prolonged flexion of the elbow, as an habitual sleeping in the fetal position F. in association with a metabolic disorder including diabetes mellitus. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow can occur at any demographic but is generally seen between 25 and 45 years of age and occurs slightly more often in women than in men. II. Diagnostic Criteria A. Pertinent History and Physical Findings Patients often present with intermittent paresthesias, numbness and/or tingling in the small finger and ulnar half of the ring finger (i.e. ulnar nerve distribution). These symptoms may be more prominent after prolonged periods of elbow flexion, such as sleeping in the “fetal position”, sleeping with the arm tucked under the pillow or head, or with repetitive elbow flexion-extension activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Entrapments & Axonal Vs. Demyelinating Neuropathies
    Challenges in Entrapments & Axonal vs. Demyelinating Neuropathies Mazen M. Dimachkie, M.D. Professor of Neurology Executive Vice Chairman Vice Chairman for Research Programs Director of Neuromuscular Division University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas Dr. Dimachkie is on the speaker’s bureau or is a consultant for Baxalta, Catalyst, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, Novartis and NuFactor. He has received grants from Alexion, Biomarin, Catalyst, CSL-Behring, FDA/OPD, GSK, MDA, NIH, Novartis, Orphazyme and TMA. Case 1 A 39 year old woman presents with 3 years h/o right medial proximal forearm pain exacerbated with activity Examination: Normal strength, sensory and reflexes Tenderness in the right medial forearm Tinel sign over right medial forearm Supination causes pain radiation to thumb What pattern? NP3 Case 1 Which nerve is involved? A. Median at the wrist / Carpal tunnel Sd B. Median at the forearm C. Median at the brachial plexus D. Ulnar at the elbow E. Radial at the spiral groove Median Neuropathy at the Wrist aka Carpal Tunnel Syndrome The most common entrapment neuropathy Lifetime prevalence is 10%, 50% bilateral It is a clinical syndrome & mostly sensory Occasionally loss of dexterity due to weak opponens pollicis & APB Signs: Flick, Tinel & Phalen Mendell, Kissel, Cornblath,Diagnosis & Management of Peripheral Nerve Disorders, 2001 Anterior Interosseous Syndrome Weak FPL, pronator quadratus & long flexor of index & middle fingers Pinch sign or OK sign, no sensory loss Pain is exacerbated by resisted proximal interphalangeal flexion of the middle finger DDX: ‘Forme fruste’ of neuralgic amyotrophy; MMN; mass lesion Dimachkie MM. Median neuropathies other than carpal tunnel syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulnar Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy at the Elbow: Relationship Between the Electrophysiological Findings and Neuropathic Pain
    J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Original Article 27: 2213–2216, 2015 Ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow: relationship between the electrophysiological findings and neuropathic pain GULISTAN HALAC1)*, PINAR TOPALOGLU2), SALIHA DEMIR3), MEHMET ALI CIKRIKCIOGLU4), HASAN HUSEYIN KARADELI1), MUHAMMET EMIN OZCAN1), TALIP ASIL1) 1) Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakıf University: 34093 Fatih Istanbul, Turkey 2) Department of Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Turkey 3) Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Turkey 4) Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, Bezmialem Vakif University, Turkey Abstract. [Purpose] Ulnar nerve neuropathies are the second most commonly seen entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities after carpal tunnel syndrome. In this study, we aimed to evaluate pain among ulnar neuropa- thy patients by the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs pain scale and determine if it correlated with the severity of electrophysiologicalfindings. [Subjects and Methods] We studied 34 patients with clinical and electrophysiological ulnar nerve neuropathies at the elbow. After diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, all patients underwent the Turkish version of the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs pain scale. [Re- sults] The ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow was classified as class-2, class-3, class-4, and class-5 (Padua Distal Ulnar Neuropathy classification) for 15, 14, 4, and 1 patient, respectively. No patient included in class-1 was detected. According to Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs pain scale, 24 patients scored under 12 points. The number of patients who achieved more than 12 points was 10. Groups were compared by using the χ2 test, and no difference was detected.
    [Show full text]