DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix H FDEP Data Exclusion Screens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

See Appendix H FDEP Data exclusion Screens DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP 4 Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Protection Division December 21, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document December 21, 2010 Table of Contents I Executive Summary 4 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 7 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 7 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 7 C. Priority Ranking 8 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 8 A. Florida’s 2010 Group 4 Update 9 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 9 a. Florida’s numeric water quality criteria 10 b. Florida’s narrative water quality criteria 10 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 11 3. Public Participation Process 12 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality Related Data and Information 13 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters (40 CFR 130.7(b)(6)(i - iv)) 15 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 16 a. Minimum Sample Size 17 b. Age of Data 17 2. Waterbodies Verified Impaired but no Pollutant causing Impairment Identified 18 3. Aquatic life use support 19 a. Exceedances of numeric water quality criteria 19 b. Waterbodies not Listed due to Natural Conditions 21 c. Impairments Indicated by Biological Information 23 2 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document December 21, 2010 d. Impairments Indicated by Nutrient Information 23 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 25 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 25 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 26 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (40 CFR 130.7(b)(4)) 27 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 27 2. FDEP’s Delisting of Water Quality Limited Segments 27 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 28 4. EPA Identified Waters 28 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 29 IV. Final Recommendation on Florida’s 2010 Section 303(d) List Submittal 30 Appendix A 2003 EPA-approved section 303(d) list for the State of Florida Appendix B Group 3 Water Quality Limited Segments added by FDEP to the Florida section 303(d) list Appendix C Group 3 Water Quality Limited Segments added by EPA to the Florida section 303(d) list Appendix D Group 3 Water Quality Limited Segments removed by FDEP from the Florida section 303(d) list Appendix E FDEP Resegmentation Crosswalk Table submitted to EPA November 19, 2010 Appendix F FDEP’s Rotating Basin Approach Appendix G Assessing Ambient Data for Naturally Variable Parameters Against Numeric Water Quality Criteria Appendix H FDEP Data Exclusion Screens 3 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document December 21, 2010 I Executive Summary On November 19, 2010, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) submitted its 2010 Group 4 update to the state’s previously approved section 303(d) list to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review. This section 303(d) list update submission is referred to in this document as the 2010 Group 4 Update. Florida’s 2010 Group 4 submittal is an update, for waterbodies in Group 4 basins, to the state’s previously approved section 303(d) list.1 Following its review of Florida’s 2010 Group 4 Update, EPA is approving that list in part and is adding waters to the state’s section 303(d) list. This document summarizes EPA’s review and the basis for the Agency’s decision. Section 303(d)(1) of the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) directs states to identify those waters within their jurisdictions for which effluent limitations required by sections 301(b)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act are not stringent enough to implement any applicable water quality standard (referred to as water quality limited segments, as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 130.7), and to establish a priority ranking for such waters, taking into account the severity of the pollution and the uses to be made of such waters. The section 303(d) listing requirement applies to water quality limited segments impaired by pollutant loadings from both point and/or nonpoint sources. After a state submits its section 303(d) list to EPA, the Agency is required to approve or disapprove that list. FDEP assessed waters for the 2010 Group 4 Update pursuant to its approved water quality standards, including the water quality standards contained in the Impaired Waters Rule, commonly referred to as the IWR. Through the Florida Watershed Restoration Act, the state legislature directed the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to develop and adopt by rule a methodology to identify waters that do not meet the State’s approved water quality standards and, therefore, are required to be included on section 303(d) lists. See Identification of Impaired Surface Waters, Chapter 62-303, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). EPA determined certain provisions of the IWR to be new or revised water quality standards2 and approved those standards on February 19, 2008.3 EPA views other IWR provisions as part of FDEP’s section 303(d) listing methodologies. Consistent with EPA’s implementing regulations and guidance, EPA considered these methodologies, to the extent that they reflect a reasonable 1 On September 2, 2009, EPA took action on Florida’s update to the section 303(d) list for Group One, Two and Five basins. Complete listings of the changes to Florida’s previously approved section 303(d) list for Group One, Two and Five basins as a result of that update are set out in EPA’s Amended Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Section 303(d) List Amendments for Basin Groups One, Two and Five. On May 13, 2010, EPA took action on Florida’s update to the section 303(d) list for Group Three basins. Complete listings of the changes to Florida’s previously approved section 303(d) list for Group Three basins as a result of that update are set out in EPA’s Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Section 303(d) List Amendments for Basin Group Three. 2 Determination Upon Review of Amended Florida Administrative Code Chapter 62-3-3, Identification of Impaired Waters. United States Environmental Protection Agency, February 19, 2008 (2008 IWR Determination). 3 Letter from James D, Giattina to Michael W. Sole. February 19, 2008 (2008 IWR Approval Letter). 4 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document December 21, 2010 interpretation of Florida’s water quality standards and sound science, when it reviewed FDEP’s section 303(d) list submittals. Waters that are not attaining Florida’s water quality standards are identified by FDEP as water quality limited segments and submitted to EPA as an update to Florida’s then-current section 303(d) list. The water quality standards and listing methodologies contained in the IWR establish specific protocols and thresholds for assessing waterbodies, in addition to data sufficiency and data quality requirements. The IWR contains procedures for assessing both aquatic life use support and human health use support. FDEP conducts these assessments based on Florida’s rotating basin approach. Florida waters are divided into five basin groups, with each group representing approximately 20% of state watersheds. Each year, FDEP assesses waterbodies within one group of basins. Lists based on those basin assessments constitute updates to the state’s then-current section 303(d) list. All five basin groups are assessed within a five year period. All waters which were included in Florida’s approved 1998 section 303(d) list will remain on Florida’s section 303(d) list, unless FDEP removes a waterbody and EPA approves that removal. FDEP submitted a 2002 update to EPA for review, assessing Group One waterbodies. EPA’s decision partially approving that update and partially disapproving and adding waters to Florida’s section 303(d) list was challenged in court. While that litigation, and related litigation challenging the IWR, were pending, FDEP developed basin group assessment reports but did not submit section 303(d) lists to EPA. On September 3, 2009, EPA approved in part and added waters to FDEP’s Update for Group One, Two and Five basins; on May 13, 2010, EPA approved in part and added waters to FDEP’s Update for Group Three basins. On November 19, 2010, FDEP submitted its Group 4 update to EPA for review. FDEP’s updated list submittal includes, among other things: Additional waterbodies in Group 4 which FDEP determined to be water quality limited segments. Group 4 waterbodies included on Florida’s previously approved 1998 section 303(d) list which were determined not to need TMDLs and were, therefore, removed from Florida’s section 303(d) list as submitted to EPA. EPA reviewed FDEP’s submittal to determine whether the 2010 Group 4 Update appropriately assessed waters based on Florida’s water quality standards, including those provisions of the IWR which have themselves been determined to be water quality standards and approved by EPA pursuant to Section 303(c) of the CWA. EPA further considered whether those provisions of the IWR which it determined to be listing methodologies reasonably identified water quality limited segments, considering the state’s water quality standards. Where EPA was unsure whether the methodology was a reasonable method for identifying water quality limited segments, the Region conducted further waterbody and data analysis. 5 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document December 21, 2010 The Agency reviewed FDEP’s waterbody assessments for all designated uses, based on Florida’s water quality standards.
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Report

    Integrated Report

    FINAL Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: 2016 Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2016 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Letter to Floridians Page 3 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Acknowledgments This document was prepared by staff in the following divisions and offices of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration − Bureau of Laboratories: o Biology Section − Water Quality Standards Program: o Standards Development Section o Aquatic Ecology and Quality Assurance Section − Water Quality Assessment Program: o Watershed Assessment Section o Watershed Monitoring Section − Water Quality Evaluation and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) Program: o Ground Water Management Section o Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section − Water Quality Restoration Program: o Nonpoint Source Management Section o Watershed Planning and Coordination Section Division of Water Resource Management − Domestic Wastewater Program − Industrial Wastewater Program − State Revolving Fund Program − Engineering, Hydrology, and Geology Program − Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources Coordination Program − Water Compliance Assurance Program Office of Water Policy Office of Intergovernmental Programs In addition, DEP thanks staff at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Department of Health, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for their valuable help in updating sections of this report, and the Southwest, Suwannee River, and St.
  • 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019

    2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019

    FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MARINE MAMMAL PATHOBIOLOGY LABORATORY 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019 County Date Field ID Sex Size Waterway City Probable Cause (cm) Nassau 01/01/2019 MNE19001 M 275 Nassau River Yulee Natural: Cold Stress Hillsborough 01/01/2019 MNW19001 M 221 Hillsborough Bay Apollo Beach Natural: Cold Stress Monroe 01/01/2019 MSW19001 M 275 Florida Bay Flamingo Undetermined: Other Lee 01/01/2019 MSW19002 M 170 Caloosahatchee River North Fort Myers Verified: Not Recovered Manatee 01/02/2019 MNW19002 M 213 Braden River Bradenton Natural: Cold Stress Putnam 01/03/2019 MNE19002 M 175 Lake Ocklawaha Palatka Undetermined: Too Decomposed Broward 01/03/2019 MSE19001 M 246 North Fork New River Fort Lauderdale Natural: Cold Stress Volusia 01/04/2019 MEC19002 U 275 Mosquito Lagoon Oak Hill Undetermined: Too Decomposed St. Lucie 01/04/2019 MSE19002 F 226 Indian River Fort Pierce Natural: Cold Stress Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19003 F 264 Whiskey Creek Fort Myers Human Related: Watercraft Collision Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19004 F 285 Mullock Creek Fort Myers Undetermined: Too Decomposed Citrus 01/07/2019 MNW19003 M 275 Gulf of Mexico Crystal River Verified: Not Recovered Collier 01/07/2019 MSW19005 M 270 Factory Bay Marco Island Natural: Other Lee 01/07/2019 MSW19006 U 245 Pine Island Sound Bokeelia Verified: Not Recovered Lee 01/08/2019 MSW19007 M 254 Matlacha Pass Matlacha Human Related: Watercraft Collision Citrus 01/09/2019 MNW19004 F 245 Homosassa River Homosassa
  • Wings Over Dutchess

    Wings Over Dutchess

    Volume 54 Number 1 www.watermanbirdclub.org January 2012 JANUARY 2012 MEETING Our first meeting in 2012 will be on Monday, January 23rd at the Freedom Plains Church Parish Hall, Route 55, Freedom Plains, across from Arlington High School, at 7:30 PM. Our Speaker will be our own member, Steve Golladay. He will present High Speed Photography of Hummingbirds. Learn about hummingbirds as well as photographic equipment and technique. Steve will demo his hummingbird photography setup, which includes five off camera flashes + one on-camera flash, and will show you some stunning photographs he was able to capture with it. We hope you will join us for a every informative and fun evening. Refreshments will follow our meeting. James Baird SP Norrie Point Vanderbilt Mills Mansion Tymor Forest Harlem Valley (w/red maple Rail Trail Mansion syrup pails) Amenia FEBRUARY 2012 & MARCH 2012 FIELD TRIPS WEDNESDAY Feb. 1 James Baird State Park *pg. 66. Meet at the restaurant parking lot at 9:00am. Feb. 8 Norrie Point *pg.78. Meet at the museum parking lot at 9:00am. Feb. 15 Bowdoin Park *pg. 16. Meet at the upper level parking area at 9:00am. Feb. 22 Vanderbilt Mansion *pg. 126. Meet at the visitor parking lot at 9:00am. Feb. 29 Wilcox Park – if closed Thompson Pond. Meet at park’s parking lot (off Rt. 199 east of Parkway) at 9:00am. Mar. 7 Mills Mansion *pg. 78. Meet at the Mansion parking lot, Staatsburg at 9:00am. Mar. 14 Tymor Forest *pg. 124. Meet at the barns at 9:00am.
  • Where to Bird in Dutchess County, 3Rd Edition

    Where to Bird in Dutchess County, 3Rd Edition

    WHERE TO BIRD IN DUTCHESS COUNTY Edited by Stan DeOrsey and Adrienne Popko Third Edition Published by The Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, Inc. Dutchess County, New York January 1, 2016 Photos by Adrienne Popko Copyright 1990, 2016 by Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, all rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 Andrew Haight Road 35 Pawling Nature Reserve 7 Bowdoin Park 36 Pond Gut 8 Brace Mountain 37 Poughkeepsie Rural Cemetery 9 Buttercup Farm Wildlife S. 38 Reese Sanctuary 10 Cary Arboretum 39 Rockefeller / Pitcher Lane 11 Cascade Mountain Road 40 Saw Kill & South Bay Trails 12 Cruger Island 41 Skunks Misery Road 13 Deep Hollow Road 42 S. Quaker Hill / Tower Hill Rds 14 Depot Hill MUA 43 Stissing Mountain MUA 15 Edward R Murrow Park 44 Stony Kill Farm Env Ed Center 16 Eleanor Roosevelt NHS 45 Sylvan Lake / Clove Road 17 Ferncliff Forest 46 Taconic-Hereford MUA 18 Flint Hill / Huckleberry Roads 47 Taconic State Park 19 Freedom Park 48 Tamarack Lake & Swamp 20 Home of Franklin Roosevelt NHS 49 Tamarack Preserve 21 Hudson Highlands State Park 50 Thompson Pond Preserve 22 Hudson River - North 51 Tivoli Bays WMA 24 Hudson River - South 52 Tower Hill Road lnnisfree26 53 Tracy Road 27 James Baird State Park 54 Tymor Park 28 Lafayetteville MUA 55 Vanderbilt Mansion NHS 29 Lake Oniad 56 Vassar College 30 Locust Grove Historic Estate 57 Vassar College Farm 31 Millbrook School 58 Wappinger Lake 32 Montgomery Place 59 Wassaic MUA 33 Ogden Mills & Norrie State Park 60 Wilcox Park 34 Oriole Mills / Norton / Yantz Rds - 2 - CROSS REFERENCE OF LOCAL NAMES Many areas in Dutchess County are commonly known by names other than those used in this book.
  • Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group

    Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group

    DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP THREE Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Management Division May 12, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 6 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 6 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 6 C. Priority Ranking 7 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 7 A. Florida’s Group Three 2010 Update 8 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 8 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 10 3. Public Participation Process 11 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 12 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters 14 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 15 2. No Pollutant Identified for Impairment 18 3. Aquatic Life Use Impairment 18 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 23 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 24 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 25 1 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters 26 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 26 2. Section 303(d) List Delistings 26 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 27 4. EPA Identified Waters 30 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 30 IV.

  • Indian River Lagoon Report Card

    Ponce Inlet M o s q u it o L a g o o B n N o r t h Edgewater M o s q u D INDIAN RIVER it o L a g o Oak Hill o n C e n t r a LAGOON D+ l REPORT CARD Turnbull Creek Grading water quality and habitat health M o s q u Big Flounder i Creek to L a go on S o C- Grades ut F h Lagoon Region 2018 2019 Mosquito Lagoon North N BC o r t Mosquito Lagoon Central h D D I n d Mosquito Lagoon South i a n C- C- R Titusville i v Banana River Lagoon e r FF L a g North IRL o o n F FF Central IRL-North FF Central IRL - South D+ C F South IRL - North F D Merritt Island South IRL - Central F F B a South IRL - South Port St. John n a F D n a R i v e r Grades L a Port Canaveral g 2018 2019 o Tributaries o n Turnbull Creek Cocoa F D+ Big Flounder Creek F F Horse Creek B B- Cocoa Eau Gallie River Rockledge Beach D- D+ Crane Creek F D- Turkey Creek D- D Goat Creek D D+ Sebastian Estuary Sebastian North Prong D+ C- D- C- Sebastian South Prong D- C+ B- C-54 Canal Taylor Creek C- C Satellite D- D+ Horse Beach St. Lucie Estuary Creek C St. Lucie River - North Fork D+ Eau Gallie St. Lucie River - South Fork F F River F F + Lower Loxahatchee D Middle Loxahatchee B B+ Melbourne C+ B- Crane Upper Loxahatchee Creek Lagoon House Loxahatchee Southwest Fork B B+ - B- B C D Turkey e n F *A grade of B is meeting Creek t r Palm a l the regulatory target I Bay n d i a n R i v D e r Goat L LEGEND Creek a g o o n Health Scores N o r t h D+ A 90-100 (Very Good) C- C- B 80-89 (Good) Sebastian Inlet Sebastian Sebastian C 70-79 (Average) North Prong Estuary C-54 Canal Sebastian D 60-69 (Poor) Sebastian South Prong F 0-59 (Very Poor) C Wabasso C+ Beach Winter Beach C e n t r a l Gifford I n d i The Indian River Lagoon a n R i v C e total health score is r Vero Beach L a g o o n S (F+) o 58 u t a slight improvement from the previous year's score h of 52 (F).
  • Water Resources of Duval County, Florida

    Water Resources of Duval County, Florida

    Water Resources of Duval County, Florida By G.G. Phelps U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4130 Prepared in cooperation with the City of Jacksonville, Florida Tallahassee, Florida 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Suite 3015 Open-File Reports Section 227 N. Bronough Street Box 25286, MS 517 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 II CONTENTS Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope.....................................................................................................................................1 Study Area and Population........................................................................................................................2 Water Use in Duval County ......................................................................................................................4 The Hydrologic Cycle ...............................................................................................................................6
  • Public Notice with Attachments

    Public Notice with Attachments

    DocuSign Envelope ID: D1C7A3C5-6723-4121-AC49-17E3EA1E8E71 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee: ALL ABOARD FLORIDA – OPERATIONS, LLC Attn: Kolleen Cobb 2855 Le Jeune Road, 4th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Permit No: SAJ-2012-01564(SP-AWP) Issuing Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: The dredging and filling of 247.47 acres of waters of the U.S. (wetlands and waters) and approximately 46 acres of other waters for the construction of an intercity passenger railroad between the eastern boundary of Orlando International Airport (OIA) and West Palm Beach, Florida. Other waters are commonly referred to as surface waters, stormwater management features, conveyance systems, and open waters not classified as streams or rivers. In addition this permit authorizes the subaqueous crossings under 13 water bodies considered navigable waters of the U.S. Table 1 below provides a jurisdictional summary and summary of subaqueous crossings of water of the United States. Compensatory mitigation is not required for subaqueous crossings. DocuSign Envelope ID: D1C7A3C5-6723-4121-AC49-17E3EA1E8E71 PERMIT NUMBER: SAJ-2012-01564 PERMITTEE: All ABOARD FLORIDA PAGE 2 of 21 Table 1 - Jurisdictional Summary Federal Project Section 106 Requires Mile Name/ Section Water body Section 404 PA Subaqueous Post Authorization 10 restrictions Crossing required East / West Segment Jim Creek x no Second Creek x no Turkey Creek x no Econlockhatchee River x no St.
  • NYC Spring Summer 2020

    NYC Spring Summer 2020

    NEW YORK UPDATE | SPRING/SUMMER | 2020 New York depends on us. IN THIS ISSUE Medical Technology and Marsh Health Bringing Nature Closer for All Protecting New York’s Water CONNECT WITH NATURE Local to Global Connections nature.org/newyork DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE NEW YORK BOARD OF TRUSTEES Celebrating James A. Attwood, Jr., Chair Daniel C. Chung, Campaign Chair Conservation Milestones Matthew B. Arnold Fazena Bacchus Dear Friend of The Nature Conservancy, Brian D. Baird Richard S. Berry With all that is happening in New York and around the world, I Anla Cheng hope this letter finds you and your family safe and well. During this difficult time, I’m especially grateful to you as a supporter Michelle J. DePass and volunteer in our work to conserve the lands and waters that Anne R. Erni sustain us, now and for the future. Samuel V. Howe This year, we are thrilled to look back and celebrate some of the Hannah Jaris © J. Grassi conservation milestones we’ve achieved throughout the state of Susannah S. Kagan New York. Nathaniel J. Klipper One half century ago, the first Earth Day took place, launching the modern environmental Eric Krasnoff movement as millions of Americans rallied for passage of the Clean Air, Clean Water and J.P. Maheu Endangered Species Acts. Jennifer Maritz At the same time, The Nature Conservancy took measures to protect ospreys and other Donald Mullen wildlife by protecting Mashomack Preserve on Shelter Island. In 1980, this preserve opened its Patricia H. Nadosy doors and trails to the public—contributing 2,039 acres to conservation in vast and meaningful Inosi M.
  • RTWBC 2004 Monthly Records

    RTWBC 2004 Monthly Records

    January 2004 Records Bald Eagle – 1/7 3/30(2ad&1imm) Stissing Lake FT,CV; 9 seen along river from Rhinecliff to Breakneck during WFC; 8/17 on ice at New Hamburg looking N from Chelsea BSI; 3/29 Weather was moderate the first week, with no snow cover. 1Ad/3imm over Hudson R, Chelsea AJM; 1/30 Norrie Pt CV; Then bitter cold arrived, moderating only slightly through the 7/31 Bowdoin Park 4ad 3imm FT remainder of the month. From the 12th to the 22nd, there were Northern Harrier – 1/1 Poughquag CP/HT; 1f/8 Old Camby several small snowfalls, then 10 inches fell on the 28th. During Rd JWinkler; 1/10 Red Hook BB; 1/24&30 Mashomack Pine the month, the Hudson River went from completely open to Plains CV; 1/27 Rhinebeck NW of fairgrounds KS completely ice-covered. Sharp-shinned Hawk – 3/1 Pawling CBC; 1/seven times yard and around county CV; 1/2 yard Stormville EBR; 1/22 yd KCF; Greater White-fronted Goose - 2/7 Dotty's Pond Dot Fleury; 1/17,22,28,29 Rhinebeck RJ; 1/7 TSP/Roe-Jansen Kill ES 2/17 Hunn's Lake Art Jones; 2/18 Hunn's Lake Tammie Carey, Cooper's Hawk – 2/1 Pawling CBC; 1/all yd Poughquag CP; Robert Williams 1/6 Rombout Rd CV; 1/21 Vassar Farm FT; 1/24 Waterbury Snow Goose - 1/3 McEnroe cornfield CV; 180/7 Hunn's Lake Hill Rd BB; 1/13, 17 & 31 checking feeders yd BAM; 1/7,29 Dot Fleury; 6/11 Rochdale Wapp CrCV (WFC) Rhinebeck RJ; 1 occ Rhinebeck KS; 1/11 Old Hopewell Rd Canada Goose - several thousand each at Stissing Lk, Hunn's immature KK LK, Rudd Pd, and Dotty's Pd, keeping them open.
  • Designated Protected and Significant Areas of Dutchess County, NY

    Designated Protected and Significant Areas of Dutchess County, NY

    Chapter 7: Designated Significant and Protected Areas of Dutchess County (DRAFT) Chapter 7: Designated Protected and Significant Areas of Dutchess County, NY ______________________________________________________________________________ Emily Vail, Neil Curri, Noela Hooper, and Allison Chatrchyan1 February 2012 (DRAFT ) Significant natural areas are valued for their environmental importance Chapter Contents and beauty, and include unusual geologic features such as scenic Protected Land Critical Environmental mountain ridges, steep ravines, and caves; hydrological features such Areas as rivers, lakes, springs, and wetlands; and areas that support Other Significant Areas threatened or endangered species or unusually diverse plant and Implications for Decision- Making animal communities. Both significant natural areas and scenic Resources resources enhance the environmental health and quality of life in Dutchess County. An area can be significant for several different reasons, including its habitat, scenic, cultural, economic, or historical values. Many areas are significant because they are unique in some way. 1 This chapter was written by Emily Vail (Cornell Cooperative Extension Environment & Energy Program), Neil Curri (Cornell Cooperative Extension Dutchess County Environment & Energy Program), Noela Hooper (Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development), and Allison Chatrchyan (Cornell Cooperative Extension Dutchess County Environment & Energy Program). The chapter is presented here in DRAFT form. Final version expected March 2012. The Natural Resource Inventory of Dutchess County, NY 1 Chapter 7: Designated Significant and Protected Areas of Dutchess County (DRAFT) Significant natural areas provide many ecosystem services, including wildlife habitat, water supply protection, recreational space, and opportunities for outdoor research. (For more information on ecosystem services, see Chapter 1: Introduction.) In order to sustain their value, it is import to protect these areas.
  • NORTH FLORIDA TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021/22 - 2025/26

    NORTH FLORIDA TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021/22 - 2025/26

    NORTH FLORIDA TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021/22 - 2025/26 Draft April 2021 North Florida TPO Transportation Improvement Program - FY 2021/22 - 2025/26 Table of Contents Section I - Executive Summary . I-1 Section II - 5 Year Summary by Fund Code . II-1 Section III - Funding Source Summary . III-1 Section A - Duval County State Highway Projects (FDOT) . A-1 Section B - Duval County State Highway / Transit Projects (JTA) . B-1 Section C - Duval County Aviation Projects . C-1 Section D - Duval County Port Projects . D-1 Section E - St. Johns County State Highway / Transit Projects (FDOT) . E-1 Section F - St. Johns County Aviation Projects . F-1 Section G - Clay County State Highway / Transit / Aviation Projects (FDOT) . G-1 Section H - Nassau County State Highway / Aviation / Port Projects (FDOT) . H-1 Section I - Area-Wide Projects . I-1 Section J - Amendments . J-1 Section A1 - Abbreviations and Acronyms (Appendix I) . A1-1 Section A2 - Path Forward 2045 LRTP Master Project List (Appendix II) . A2-1 Section A3 - Path Forward 2045 LRTP Goals and Objectives (Appendix III) . A3-1 Section A4 - 2020 List of Priority Projects (Appendix IV) . A4-1 Section A5 - Federal Obligation Reports (Appendix V) . A5-1 Section A6 - Public Comments (Appendix VI) . A6-1 Section A7 - 2045 Cost Feasible Plan YOE Total Project Cost (Appendix VII) . A7-1 Section A8 - Transportation Disadvanagted (Appendix VIII) . A8-1 Section A9 - FHWA Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (Appendix IX) . A9-1 Section A10 – Transportation Performance Measures (Appendix X). A10-1 Section PI - Project Index . PI-1 Draft April 2021 SECTION I Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a staged multi-year program of transportation project improvements to be implemented during the next five-year period in the North Florida TPO area which will be funded by Title 23 U.S.C.