DOCSLIB.ORG

Journalism in the Service of Democracy: a Summit of Deans, Faculty, Students and Journalists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journalism in the Service of Democracy: a Summit of Deans, Faculty, Students and Journalists JOURNALISM IN THE SERVICE OF DEMOCRACY: A SUMMIT OF DEANS, FACULTY, STUDENTS AND JOURNALISTS A Report of the Proceedings Sponsored by Carnegie Corporation of New York in Partnership with the Paley Center for Media Designed by Dever Designs Printed by Universal Printing Company JOURNALISM IN THE SERVICE OF DEMOCRACY: A SUMMIT OF DEANS, FaCULTY, STUDENTS AND JOURNALISTS k by Christopher Connell Sponsored by Carnegie Corporation of New York in Partnership with the Paley Center for Media New York City, January 8-9, 2008 Christopher Connell is an independent journalist and former assistant chief of the Washington bureau of The Associated Press. He wrote the 2006 Carnegie report on Journalism’s Crisis of Confidence: A Challenge for the Next Generation as well as the 2002 Carnegie Challenge paper, Homeland Defense and Democratic Liberties: An American Balance in Danger? He is also the author of the annual Internationalizing the Campus reports published by NAFSA: Association of International Educators. His email is [email protected]. ©2008 Carnegie Corporation of New York Table of Contents Introduction p i by Vartan Gregorian Journalism in the Service of Democracy: A Summit of Deans, Faculty, Students and Journalists p 1 by Christopher Connell Appendix A p 39 Breakout Sessions Appendix B p 55 Participants List Cover Photos: Bob Calo, Getty Images, Corbis Interior Photos: Doug Goodman Introduction The first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which famously includes the words, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” leaves no doubt about how strongly the Founding Fathers felt about freedom of expression and of the press as being intrinsic to the strength of democracy. But they also clearly under- stood that freedom of expression, without wide dissemination of the underlying ideas and knowledge, is insufficient to support or sustain the democratic process. As Thomas Jefferson noted in 1787, citizens need to have “…full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, and to connive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people.” The fact is that though Jefferson, relentlessly attacked by the press when he was president, probably often rued the day that newspapers and even muckrakers became prominent fixtures of the American scene, he remained a strong advocate of free, unfettered journalism throughout his life. Jefferson must have been keenly aware of how the dichotomy inherent in the role of the press in American society—both to serve as a marketplace of ideas and to provide an opportunity for voicing opposition to even the most widely held beliefs—is one of its most critical and unique features. After all, the press is not a commodity. It does not exist solely to enrich the economy or to be a vehicle for advertising, though nowadays, based on the business model of some newspapers, which emphasize profit over the value of news, one might not be blamed for thinking the opposite. Certainly, we must appreciate that the press is powered by the dual engines of business and public service: the former supports its viability and the latter sustains its mission. But undergirding all its functions is the most foundational purpose of a free press, which is to hold us all accountable: government officials, policymakers, educators, philanthropists, business leaders and others, as well as political parties and the electorate itself. In the media, the daily discussion of the nation’s business and the world’s—which, with the advent of the Internet, cable television, and other means of instant access to the news is now on a 24/7 cycle—is the way we take the temperature of our lives, our culture, our society and even our civilization; it is the way we assess our direction and debate where we are going, or should be going, in the future. Hence, in a democracy, the value of the press is inestimable. Certainly, its excesses must be spotlighted, its ability to damage as well as uplift must always be considered, journalism in the service of democracy | i and both journalism and journalists themselves must be held to very high standards that may not be compromised—but even with all those potential problems in mind, the weakening, or even absence of a free and vibrant press in our nation is unthinkable. The institution is irreplaceable. But of course, with freedom comes great responsibility, and freedom of the press is no exception. Our society is built on a system of checks and balances that applies not only to the structure of government but to almost every other facet of the way our na- tion functions. Inherent in this system is a constant weighing of one idea against another that helps to ensure all voices are heard. Every day, in the United States, individuals and groups form picket lines, engage in demonstrations, pamphleteering, put up posters, write opinion columns, call in to talk radio, write blogs and in countless other ways air out the full spectrum of ideas from the political right to the left and everywhere in- between as well as vigorously debate each other on almost every imaginable subject. But the fact that we engage in these activities is part of what makes us responsible citizens. Without citizen participation in the civic life of our nation, we would likely be living in a society locked down by the kind of totalitarian regime depicted in George Orwell’s classic, 1984, in which it was so easy for facts to be denied and information rejiggered to suit those in power, or Arthur Koestler’s novel Darkness at Noon, in which reality was manipulated so that fiction easily replaced fact. We are fortunate, in the United States, to have more than 2,000 television stations, over 200 cable television networks, around 14,000 radio stations, nearly 9,000 news- papers and over 100 million blogs—many of these, naturally, concerned in large part with local issues or, in the case of blogs, personal ones—but, amidst the great diversity of our nation, it is our national press and media that help to provide a national vocabu- lary for the discussion of the issues that most affect life in the United States as well as our national and international policies. Perhaps now more than ever, in this “age of anxiety,” of globalization, conflict, non-stop opinion and an overwhelming info-glut, we need objective observers and reporters to help us distill the onslaught of events, data and information into knowledge and wisdom. It is in that connection that we should be able to look to the press to assist us in answering the telling questions asked by T.S. Eliot: “Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” Eliot’s query speaks to the “Home Depot-ization” of so much of the news that we interact with these days. The proliferation of online sources of news and opinion along with cable stations and an extraordinary, seemingly depthless supply of print and electronic sources of specialized, compartmentalized information means that one can pick and choose among the issues one wishes to be exposed to. That may be fine, ii | journalism in the service of democracy up to a point and certainly, it is everyone’s right to pursue their individual interests and concerns, but if all an individual chooses to know about or understand is tailored around his or her particular notions or points of view, such narrow vision may well leave them seriously under-informed about national and international affairs that deserve their attention in order to be a knowledgeable and active member of our participatory democracy. One of Carnegie Corporation’s early trustees noted that it was incumbent upon philanthropic foundations to have “glass pockets” in terms of how they carried out their work, and the same can be said of the democratic process: it needs to be transpar- ent about how it functions but there also have to be educated, informed and responsible citizens watching what our elected leaders do in the name of our nation and discussing and debating the results. We should ask the same of our journalists: that they be educated, steeped in exper- tise, deeply knowledgeable about the subjects they report on and, one hopes, even cul- tured individuals. It is not enough to simply turn out reams of reporting and then race on to the next story. To understand the underlying ideas and possible ramifications of important, even truly transformative events, requires that the individual conveying the story be trained and informed enough to deal with complex, nuanced information with a richness and depth that cannot simply be pulled out of the proverbial hat. Journal- ists must do their job with excellence, skill and understanding—and we must do ours, which is to both learn from what is reported to us and challenge it when necessary. In that connection, journalism professor and columnist Eric Alterman reminds us about the various viewpoints that have been expressed over the course of this nation’s history about the relationship between journalism and democracy, including those of Walter Lippmann and John Dewey.* Lippmann lost faith in the idea that journalism could overcome what he thought of as the public’s susceptibility to manipulation, while Dewey believed the Fourth Estate was critical to keeping the public involved in the democratic process. Expanding on this idea, Alterman notes that “the ability to discuss, deliberate on and debate various perspectives” is how the citizenry moves toward consen- sus. And whether that consensus is yay or nay—or even maybe—about a particular issue or policy, we will only be trying to fight our way blindly through the fog of opinion, rhetoric and rumor if we don’t have the eyes of free, independent and excellent journal- ists to help us see the road ahead.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2015–2016
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015–2016 NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC 2015–16 ANNUAL REPORT 1 CONTENTS Reflections on the 2015–16 Season 2 Oscar S. Schafer, Chairman 4 Matthew VanBesien, President 6 Alan Gilbert, Music Director 8 Year at a Glance 10 Our Audiences 12 The Orchestra 14 The Board of Directors 20 The Administration 22 Conductors, Soloists, and Ensembles 24 Serving the Community 26 Education 28 Expanding Access 32 Global Immersion 36 Innovation and Preservation 40 At Home and Online 42 Social Media 44 The Archives 47 The Year in Pictures 48 The Benefactors 84 Lifetime Gifts 86 Leonard Bernstein Circle 88 Annual Fund 90 Education Donors 104 Heritage Society 106 Volunteer Council 108 Independent Auditor’s Report 110 2 NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC 2015–16 ANNUAL REPORT THE SEASON AT A GLANCE Second Line Title Case Reflections on the 2015–16 Season 2 NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC 2015–16 ANNUAL REPORT NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC 2015–16 ANNUAL REPORT 3 REFLECTIONS ON THE 2015–16 SEASON From the New York Philharmonic’s Leadership I look back on the Philharmonic’s 2015–16 season and remember countless marvelous concerts that our audiences loved, with repertoire ranging from the glory of the Baroque to the excitement of the second NY PHIL BIENNIAL. As our Music Director, Alan Gilbert has once again brought excitement and inspiration to music lovers across New York City and the world. I also look back on the crucial, impactful developments that took place offstage. Throughout the season our collaboration with Lincoln Center laid a strong foundation for the renovation of our home.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with Pamela Newkirk
    Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with Pamela Newkirk Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Newkirk, Pamela Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with Pamela Newkirk, Dates: August 3, 2012 Bulk Dates: 2012 Physical 7 uncompressed MOV digital video files (3:35:52). Description: Abstract: Journalism professor and author Pamela Newkirk (1957 - ) won a Pulitzer Prize in 1992 for her work at New York Newsday and works as a journalism professor at New York University. She has written two major books, Within the Veil: Black Journalists, White Media and Letters from Black America: Intimate Portraits of the African American Experience. Newkirk was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on August 3, 2012, in New York, New York. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identification: A2012_164 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® Journalist, professor and author Pamela Newkirk was born in New York City to Louis and Gloria Newkirk. Growing up, her father collected African American memorabilia which inspired her enduring interest in black history and culture. Newkirk attended New York University where she received her B.A. degree in journalism. She later earned her master's degree in journalism and her Ph.D. degree in comparative and international education from Columbia University. In 1984, after writing for numerous African American newspapers, Newkirk began her first position as a daily reporter for the Knickerbocker News in Albany, New York. There, she worked her way up from a suburban beat reporter to the New York State Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perceived Credibility of Professional Photojournalism Compared to User-Generated Content Among American News Media Audiences
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE August 2020 THE PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PHOTOJOURNALISM COMPARED TO USER-GENERATED CONTENT AMONG AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA AUDIENCES Gina Gayle Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gayle, Gina, "THE PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PHOTOJOURNALISM COMPARED TO USER-GENERATED CONTENT AMONG AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA AUDIENCES" (2020). Dissertations - ALL. 1212. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/1212 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This study examines the perceived credibility of professional photojournalism in context to the usage of User-Generated Content (UGC) when compared across digital news and social media platforms, by individual news consumers in the United States employing a Q methodology experiment. The literature review studies source credibility as the theoretical framework through which to begin; however, using an inductive design, the data may indicate additional patterns and themes. Credibility as a news concept has been studied in terms of print media, broadcast and cable television, social media, and inline news, both individually and between genres. Very few studies involve audience perceptions of credibility, and even fewer are concerned with visual images. Using online Q methodology software, this experiment was given to 100 random participants who sorted a total of 40 images labeled with photographer and platform information. The data revealed that audiences do discern the source of the image, in both the platform and the photographer, but also take into consideration the category of news image in their perception of the credibility of an image.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Censorship and the First Amendment Robert A
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 25 Article 2 Issue 1 Symposium on Censorship & the Media 1-1-2012 Self-Censorship and the First Amendment Robert A. Sedler Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Robert A. Sedler, Self-Censorship and the First Amendment, 25 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 13 (2012). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol25/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES SELF-CENSORSHIP AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT ROBERT A. SEDLER* I. INTRODUCTION Self-censorship refers to the decision by an individual or group to refrain from speaking and to the decision by a media organization to refrain from publishing information. Whenever an individual or group or the media engages in self-censorship, the values of the First Amendment are compromised, because the public is denied information or ideas.' It should not be sur- prising, therefore, that the principles, doctrines, and precedents of what I refer to as "the law of the First Amendment"' are designed to prevent self-censorship premised on fear of govern- mental sanctions against expression. This fear-induced self-cen- sorship will here be called "self-censorship bad." At the same time, the First Amendment also values and pro- tects a right to silence.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform from Post-Apartheid South Africa Catherine M
    Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 20 | Issue 4 Article 4 8-1-1993 Land Reform from Post-Apartheid South Africa Catherine M. Coles Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr Part of the Land Use Law Commons Recommended Citation Catherine M. Coles, Land Reform from Post-Apartheid South Africa, 20 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 699 (1993), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol20/iss4/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAND REFORM FOR POST-APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA Catherine M. Coles* I. INTRODUCTION...................................................... 700 II. LAND SYSTEMS IN COLLISION: PRECOLONIAL AND COLONIAL LAND SYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA. 703 A. An Overview of Precolonial Land Systems. 703 B. Changing Rights to Landfor Indigenous South African Peoples Under European Rule. 706 III. THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF RACIAL INEQUALITY AND APART- HEID THROUGH A LAND PROGRAM. 711 A. Legislative Development of the Apartheid Land Program. 712 B. The Apartheid System of Racial Zoning in Practice: Limiting the Land Rights of Black South Africans. 716 1. Homelands and National States: Limiting Black Access to Land by Restricting Citizenship. 716 2. Restricting Black Land Rights in Rural Areas Outside the Homelands through State Control. 720 3. Restricting Black Access to Urban Land..................... 721 IV. DISMANTLING APARTHEID: THE NATIONAL PARTY'S PLAN FOR LAND REFORM............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Paper (PDF)
    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series Leading the Way to Better News: The Role of Leadership in a World Where Most of the “Powers That Be” Became the “Powers That Were” By Geoffrey Cowan Shorenstein Center Fellow, Fall 2007 University Professor and Annenberg Family Chair in Communication Leadership, University of Southern California February 15, 2008 #D-44 © 2008 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. Abstract During the past several years, as traditional news operations have faced sharp declines in circulation, advertising, viewership, and audiences, and as they have begun to make a seemingly unrelenting series of cuts in the newsroom budgets, scholars and professionals have been seeking formulas or models designed to reverse the trend. During those same years, many of the major news organizations that dominated the landscape a generation ago, those that David Halberstam called “The Powers That Be,” have lost their leadership role and been absorbed by other companies. This paper argues that while there is good reason to worry about the decline in what might be called “boots-on-the-ground” journalism, there are reasons to be hopeful. While most of those concerned with the topic have urged structural changes in ownership, this paper argues that the key is leadership. To understand the demands on leaders, it is essential to understand which of three motives is most important to the publication’s owners: profits, influence, or personal prestige. Each motive presents distinct challenges and opportunities. Looking at the fate of a number of large media organizations over the past decade, the paper argues that the most important model for success is outstanding leadership that combines a talent for business, entrepreneurship and innovation with a profound commitment to great journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Amanda Bennett
    Amanda Bennett Amanda Bennett is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, investigative journalist and editor and was named Director of the Voice of America in March 2016. Through 2013, she was Executive Editor, Bloomberg News, where she created and ran a global team of investigative reporters and editors. She was also co-founder of Bloomberg News’ Women’s project. She was editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer from June 2003 to November 2006, and prior to that was editor of the Herald-Leader in Lexington, Kentucky. She also served for three years as managing editor/projects for The Oregonian in Portland. Bennett served as a Wall Street Journal reporter for more than 20 years. A graduate of Harvard College, she held numerous posts at the Journal, including auto industry reporter in Detroit in the late 70s and early 80s, Pentagon and State Department reporter, Beijing correspondent, management editor/reporter, national economics correspondent and, finally, chief of the Atlanta bureau until 1998, when she moved to The Oregonian. Bennett shared the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting with her Journal colleagues, and in 2001 led a team from The Oregonian to a Pulitzer for public service. Projects by the Bloomberg Projects and Investigations team won numerous awards, including Loeb, Polk, Barlett & Steele, Headliners, Society of American Business Editors and Writers and Overseas Press Club Awards. She was a member of the board of the Pulitzer Prizes from 2003 to 2011 and served as co-Chair of the Pulitzer Board in 2010. She also served on the boards of the Loeb Awards, the American Society of News Editors; and of the Fund for Investigative Journalism as well as the board of advisers of the Temple University Press; the board of directors of Axis Philly, a nonprofit local news site; and of the Rosenbach Museum, a Philadelphia museum of rare books.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicted: the New York Times and the Bias Question Epilogue CSJ-10
    CSJ‐ 10‐ 0034.2 PO Conflicted: The New York Times and the Bias Question Epilogue New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller’s rebuttal ran adjacent to Ombudsman Clark Hoyt’s column on the Times’ website on February 6, 2010. Neither Hoyt’s column nor Keller’s response ran in the paper. Keller opened by offering a quick and forceful endorsement of the Times’ Jerusalem bureau chief, Ethan Bronner. Then Keller argued that the decision to keep Bronner in Jerusalem was made out of respect for open‐minded readers who, he said, Hoyt improperly implied were not capable of distinguishing reality from appearances. He noted that the paper’s rulebook properly gave editors wide latitude to act in conflict of interest cases. Indeed, he continued, a journalist’s personal connections to a subject could contribute depth and texture to their reporting. As examples, he cited C.J. Chivers, Anthony Shadid, and Nazila Fathi. However, he chose not to go into detail about their biographies. Nor did he write about columnist Thomas Friedman and the instances in which he was touched by the Israeli‐Palestinian conflict. Instead, Keller observed that, as a reader, he could discern nothing in these journalists’ reporting that betrayed their personal feeling about the issues they covered. Finally, he closed with the argument that the paper had to be careful not to capitulate to partisans on either side of a conflict. To submit to their demands would rob the paper of experienced journalists like Bronner, whereas in fact the partisans were incapable of fairly evaluating him. This did not mean, he said, that he was denying the significance of Bronner’s family connections to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Times Company 2001 Annual Report 1
    596f1 2/27/02 8:21 AM Page 1 The New York Times Company SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Shareholder Stock Listing The program assists and Globe Santa, which distributes Information Online The New York Times Company encourages promising students toys and books to needy chil- www.nytco.com Class A Common Stock is whose parents may not have dren in the greater Boston To stay up to date on the listed on the New York had the opportunity to attend area and is administered by Times Company, visit our Stock Exchange. college, to earn degrees from the Foundation, raised $1.4 Web site, where you will find Ticker symbol: NYT accredited four-year colleges million in its 2001 campaign. news about the Company as or universities. Each scholarship well as shareholder and finan- Auditors provides up to $12,000 annually Annual Meeting toward the student’s education. cial information. Deloitte & Touche LLP The Annual Meeting of Tw o World Financial Center shareholders will be held The Foundation’s 2001 annual Office of the Secretary New York, NY 10281 on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, report, scheduled for midyear at 10 a.m. (212) 556-7531 publication, is available at Automatic Dividend www.nytco/foundation or It will take place at: Corporate Reinvestment Plan by mail on request. New Amsterdam Theatre Communications The Company offers share- 214 West 42nd Street holders a plan for automatic (212) 556-4317 The New York Times Neediest New York, NY 10036 reinvestment of dividends in Cases Fund, administered by Investor Relations its Class A Common Stock the Foundation, raised $9.0 mil- for additional shares.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping 21St Century Journalism Leveraging a “Teaching Hospital Model” in Journalism Education by C.W
    New America Foundation Shaping 21st Century Journalism Leveraging a “Teaching Hospital Model” in Journalism Education By C.W. Anderson, Tom Glaisyer, Jason Smith and Marika Rothfeld, October 2011 Report Summary As the media industry evolves to meet the challenges of the emerging digitally-networked era, so too are journalism schools. Democracy and healthy local communities require this evolution. As the media industry reshapes itself, a tremendous opportunity emerges for America‖s journalism programs. Neither news organizations nor journalism programs will disappear, but both must rethink their missions, particularly now that many more people can be journalists (at least, on an occasional basis) and many more people produce media than ever before. The Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State Journalism education programs have an University (Photo credit: Sean Horan/Flickr) opportunity to become “anchor institutions” in the emerging informational ecosystem. Many schools have long embraced elements of this vision, but satisfying the information needs of communities will require schools to take on all the challenges of engaging as serious and valuable producers of meaningful journalism. To date, some programs have avoided or shirked these responsibilities, failing to leverage broadcast licenses as part of their educational mission or inadequately supporting the pursuit of meaningful journalism by students. A move to embrace a community news mission would add a powerful momentum to the recommendation of the Knight Commission Report on the Information Needs of Democracies that “higher education, community and nonprofit institutions [should increase their role] as hubs of journalistic activity and other information-sharing for local communities.” This call was echoed in the recently issued Federal Communications Commission report on the changing media landscape in a broadband age.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism and Mass Communica- Tions Accreditation
    Journalism and Mass Communica- tions Accreditation 2017 – 2018 Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications © 2017 ACEJMC publishes Journalism and Mass Communications Accreditation in August each year. The Council also maintains a website, accessible at www.acejmc.org and publishes an online newsletter at: | http://www.acejmc.org/publications/newsletters/ Susanne Shaw ACEJMC Executive Director © 2017, The Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications. Material may be copied for personal or educational use but may not be republished in any form or used for com- mercial purposes without written permission of the copyright owner. ACEJMC 3 Table of Contents Table of contents Administrators: Council and Committee Officers ............ 6 Part V: Accrediting Standards Fundamentals: ACEJMC Mission Statement ............... 7 1Preamble .................................................. 41 11: Mission, Governance and Administration ......................... ACEJMC Vision Statement ............... .8 42 12: Curriculum and Instruction ................................... 44 Preamble: Purposes and Benefits of Accreditation ....... 9 13: Diversity and Inclusiveness ................................... 47 14: Full-time and Part-time Faculty ................................ 48 Part I: Accreditation Authority 15: Scholarship: Research, Creative and Professional Activity ............. Accreditation Defined .......................................... 49 10 16: Student Services ..........................................
    [Show full text]