DOCSLIB.ORG

Buller District Council Lifelines Study Alpine Fault Earthquake

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buller District Council Lifelines Study Alpine Fault Earthquake Buller District Council Lifelines Study Alpine Fault Earthquake Scenario Buller District Council June 2006 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to Buller District Council is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of Buller District Council. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor Buller District Council accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. Earthquake Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Buller District Council Lifelines Study Alpine Fault Earthquake Scenario & Lifelines Vulnerability Assessment Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART I – INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................21 PART II – THE ALPINE FAULT EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO 2 EARTHQUAKE OVERVIEW FOR BULLER DISTRICT ...................................................24 2.1 SELECTION OF EARTHQUAKE EVENT.........................................................................................24 2.2 COMPARISON OF HISTORIC AND ALPINE FAULT EARTHQUAKES...............................................27 2.3 EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS.............................................................................................................27 2.4 GROUND SHAKING HAZARD .....................................................................................................28 2.5 LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ...........................................................................................................41 2.5.1 Extent of Liquefaction potential......................................................................................41 2.5.2 Liquefaction Zones .........................................................................................................42 2.6 LANDSLIDES..............................................................................................................................43 2.7 SEICHES ....................................................................................................................................45 2.8 TSUNAMI...................................................................................................................................45 3 HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES .............................................................................................47 3.1 1929 BULLER EARTHQUAKE .....................................................................................................47 3.1.1 General...........................................................................................................................47 3.1.2 Roads ..............................................................................................................................48 3.1.3 Railway...........................................................................................................................51 3.1.4 Port.................................................................................................................................51 3.1.5 Drainage.........................................................................................................................52 3.1.6 Communications .............................................................................................................53 3.1.7 Water ..............................................................................................................................54 3.1.8 Sewer ..............................................................................................................................55 3.2 1968 INANGAHUA EARTHQUAKE...............................................................................................55 3.2.1 Roads ..............................................................................................................................55 3.2.2 Railway...........................................................................................................................56 3.2.3 Drainage.........................................................................................................................56 3.2.4 Telecommunications .......................................................................................................56 3.2.5 Electricity........................................................................................................................57 3.2.6 Water and Sewer.............................................................................................................57 4 ALPINE FAULT EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO –PHYSICAL EFFECTS...........................58 4.1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................58 4.2 TIME ZERO - 10:15AM ON A WEEKDAY MORNING IN LATE WINTER...........................................58 4.3 TIME ZERO PLUS 1 MINUTE........................................................................................................59 4.4 TIME ZERO PLUS 1 HOUR ...........................................................................................................61 4.5 TIME ZERO PLUS 3 HOURS .........................................................................................................62 4.6 TIME ZERO PLUS 9 HOURS .........................................................................................................63 4.7 TIME ZERO PLUS 24 HOURS .......................................................................................................63 4.8 TIME ZERO PLUS 48 HOURS .......................................................................................................64 4.9 TIME ZERO PLUS 1 WEEK...........................................................................................................65 4.10 TIME ZERO PLUS 2 WEEKS ....................................................................................................66 4.11 TIME ZERO PLUS 1 MONTH....................................................................................................67 4.12 TIME ZERO PLUS 1 YEAR.......................................................................................................68 5 ALPINE FAULT EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO –EFFECT ON INDIVIDUALS ................70 5.1 HOKITIKA BUSINESSMAN..........................................................................................................70 5.1.1 First three days...............................................................................................................71 5.1.2 One month after..............................................................................................................73 5.1.3 One year after.................................................................................................................74 5.2 KOKATAHI FARMER ..................................................................................................................75 5.2.1 First three days...............................................................................................................75 5.2.2 One month ......................................................................................................................77 5.2.3 One year .........................................................................................................................78 5.3 FRANZ JOSEF TOURIST ..............................................................................................................78 5.3.1 First three days...............................................................................................................78 5.3.2 One month after..............................................................................................................79 5.3.3 One year after.................................................................................................................80 5.4 HOKITIKA RESIDENT.................................................................................................................80 5.4.1 First three days...............................................................................................................80 5.4.2 One month after..............................................................................................................81 5.4.3 One year After ................................................................................................................82 PART III – INTERDEPENDENCIES & LIFELINES 6 INTERDEPENDENCIES – POST EARTHQUAKE...............................................................83 6.1 INDIVIDUAL NEEDS...................................................................................................................83 6.1.1 Three Days......................................................................................................................89 6.1.2 End of First Month .........................................................................................................91
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internal Correspondence
    Internal Correspondence Our ref: Your ref: To: PRSG – T. Wilkes Date: From: Terrestrial Ecosystems Unit – J. Marshall Subject: Te Kuha Coal Mine Summary • The applicant has provided appropriate and adequate information to assess the vegetation and flora values of the proposed industrial footprint, the impact of the proposal on those values and potential mitigation and compensation actions • The vegetation and flora values within the Westport Water Conservation Reserve, the Ballarat and Mount Rochfort Conservation Areas and the Lower Buller Gorge Scenic Reserve are clearly significant, particularly the degree of intactness but also the degree of connectivity to other large and relatively unmodified areas of high ecological value, and because of the presence of several “Naturally Uncommon Ecosystems”, two Nationally Threatened plant species, one and potentially two or three plant species in decline – at risk of extinction, and six species with scientifically interesting distributions. • The site is an ecologically important part of the Ecological District and Region. The elevated Brunner coal measures ecosystems are nationally unique: Te Kuha and Mt William are distinguished from all other parts of the elevated Brunner coal measures as they are the only discrete parts of the system that are essentially intact with no significant disruption to ecological patterns and processes and they represent the best example of coastal hillslope forest remaining on elevated Brunner coal measures. • The impacts, both in short and long time frames on significant biodiversity values of an opencast coal mine and associated infrastructure, are significant; the remedial effects of active restoration and site rehabilitation will be limited. • The suggested mitigation actions include avoidance measures, remedial actions and some mitigation and/or compensation suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Buller District Council Bylaw Amendment to the Buller District
    Buller District Council Bylaw Amendment to the Buller District Council general bylaw NZS 9201 Part 12 Control of Dogs Section 206 Control of dogs 1204.5 Dogs may be exercised free of restraining devices under the owners constant observation and voice control where there is no likelihood to contravene Section 1204.2 of these Bylaws in the following areas: (1) River edges, beach frontage, including dune areas (excluding conservation areas), or (2) The Westport domain, Brougham street domain, the southern end of the Carters beach domain or, (3) In Reefton, the Strand, adjacent the racecourse on the Crampton road reserve, and the old cemetery on Buller Road. 1205.3 Where a dog is not under control in terms of Section 1202 of this bylaw, the dog control officer may, where the owner is known, and has not been convicted of an offence, or been the recipient of an infringement notice and the dog has not been impounded within the preceding 12 month period, return the dog to the owner forthwith, providing, (a) The owner can be readily located, and (b) The owner is able to receive the dog, and (c) The owner is willing to pay a recovery fee, and (d) The dog if over 3 months of age is registered, and Buller District Council, P O Box 21, Westport Ph: (03) 788 9111 Fax (03) 788 8041 www.bullerdc.govt.nz (e) The conditions under which the dog is kept are satisfactory 1205.4 Any dog that has been impounded due to lack of control shall not be released unless the dog control officer is satisfied that the conditions and facilities under which the dog is normally kept are of a standard to prevent the dog from being able to roam at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness List
    List of Witnesses Part One Ronald Henry Abdinor Marketing and Personnel Manager Tai Poutini Polytechnic Graeme John Alexander Building Inspector Buller District Council Terence Neale Archer Manager, Regulatory Services Buller District Council John Stafford Bainbridge Senior Conservation Officer Department of Conservation Rodney George Chambers Development Officer, Coast Care Programme Christchurch City Council Calvin Fraser Cochrane Regional Works Officer Department of Conservation Ian Ross Davidson Finance Officer Department of Conservation Mark Peter Davis Conservancy Mining Officer Department of Conservation Dr Alan Spencer Edmonds Deputy Director General Department of Conservation Kevin James Field Conservation Officer Department of Conservation Lakshman Ravindra Fernando Planning Officer Buller District Council Darren William Gamble Student (Survivor) Tai Poutini Polytechnic William Stuart Gilbertson Chairperson Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society, West Coast Kathryn Helen Groome Senior Conservation Officer, Recreation/Tourism Liaison Department of Conservation Bruce Neville Hamilton Chairperson West Coast Tai Poutini Conservation Board Wayne Douglas Harper Worker Department of Conservation Annabelle Hasselman Recreation Design Planner Department of Conservation Alan Brent Hendrickson Constable New Zealand Police Keith Norman Johnston Executive Manager, Strategic Development Department of Conservation William Ramsay Mansfield Director General of Conservation Ian Scott McClure Human Resources and Administration Manager Department
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
    [Show full text]
  • Walks in the Westport Area, West Coast
    WEST COAST Look after yourself Your safety is your responsibility Walks in the Choose a walk that matches the weather and your own • Plan your trip experience, and interests you. Know what the weather • Tell someone your plans is doing – it can change dramatically in a short time. • Be aware of the weather Westport area Call at Department of Conservation (DOC) offices or Visitor Centres to check current weather and • Know your limits track conditions. • Take sufficient supplies Times given are a guide only, and will vary depending on Visit www.mountainsafety.org.nz to learn more. fitness, weather and track conditions. For walks longer than an hour, pack a small first aid kit and take extra food and drink. Insect repellent is recommended to ward off sandflies and mosquitoes. Cape Foulwind Walkway Photo: Miles Holden The combined output of coal mines and sawmills helped create a remarkable railway up the sheer-sided Ngakawau Gorge to Charming Creek. It is now used by thousands of walkers who rate it one of the best walkways around. Westport had the West Coast’s earliest gold diggings The Westport area extends from and has some of the best-preserved reminders of this the Mokihinui River in the north vibrant period. Your historical wanderings can range from the haunting hillside site of Lyell, which many to Tauranga Bay in the south, and motorists pass unaware of, to the lonely Britannia inland to the Buller Gorge, including battery, reached by determined trampers via a several mountain ranges. It is valley track. wonderfully diverse. Even the highways have historic features, including Hawks Crag, a low-roofed ledge blasted out of solid There is a great range of walking rock in the lower Buller Gorge, and the stone-piered Iron Bridge in the upper gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Evidence: Paul Williams: Proposed Mokihinui Hydro
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2010-CHC-115, 123, 124 AND 135 IN THE MATTER of Appeals pursuant to Section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WEST COAST ENT INC Appellant AND ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND WHITE WATER NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant AND DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Appellant AND WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL AND BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondents ....Continued over leaf _____________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL WORTHING WILLIAMS FOR DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Dated: 13 May 2012 _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Department of Conservation, West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservancy Private Bag 701, Sewell Street HOKITIKA Ph 03 756 9100 Fax 03 756 9188 Counsel Acting: A Cameron, D van Mierlo 2 AND MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Applicant AND FRIDA INTA Section 274 Party AND WHANAU PIHAWAI WEST – RICHARD WAYNE BARBER AND IRI MAY BARBER MILNER Section 274 Party AND J MacTAGGART Section 274 Party AND ORION ENERGY NZ LTD, ALPINE ENERGY LTD, MAIN POWER NZ LTD AND ELECTRICITY ASHBURTON LTD Section 274 Party AND NZ RAFTING INC Section 274 Party AND ANN SHERIDAN Section 274 Party AND BULLER ELECTRICITY Section 274 Party 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE...............................4 2. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE............................................................5 3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS...................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Lifeline Assets
    West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 7: Communications Lifeline Assets West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group August 2017 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. This report has been prepared on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group by: Ian McCahon BE (Civil), David Elms BA, MSE, PhD Rob Dewhirst BE, ME (Civil) Geotech Consulting Ltd 21 Victoria Park Road Rob Dewhirst Consulting Ltd 29 Norwood Street Christchurch 38A Penruddock Rise Christchurch Westmorland Christchurch Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Cover Photo: Telecommunications cabinet hit by fallen power pole, Kaikoura earthquake 2016. Photo from Chorus. West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 7: Communications Lifeline Assets Contents 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Ambient Air Quality
    State of the Environment Report West Coast Ambient Air Quality May, 2004 State of the Environment Report State of the Environment Technical Report # 02002 West Coast Ambient Air Quality Document status: Final Report This report provides information on air quality monitoring conducted at Westport, Reefton, Runanga, Greymouth and Hokitika over the period from 2001-2003. Parameters measured include: 24 hour particulate matter less than 10 micron (PM10), continuous and monthly sulphur dioxide, and monthly volatile organic compounds: benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene and xylene. A human health risk assessment is provided. Prepared by: Dr Craig Stevenson, , Air and Environmental Sciences Vera Hally, , Air and Environmental Sciences Mathew Noonan, , Air and Environmental Sciences T.I. James West Coast Regional Council Reviewed by: C Ingle West Coast Regional Council Cover photo: Greymouth looking north from Arnott Heights WCRC Ref:0401 W:\Resource Science\Monitoring\SOE monitoring\Air quality\Reports\Annual reports\2004 SER tj0504 Final report.doc May 2004 State of the Environment Report –West Coast Ambient Air Quality ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides results from ambient air quality monitoring carried out in five West Coast towns from 2001-03. Concentrations of particulate matter under 10 micron (PM10) were measured using a High-Volume sampler, sampling 1 day in 3, in Greymouth in 2001, in Westport in 2002 and in Reefton in 2003. Sulphur dioxide concentrations were measured using a continuous fluorescence instrument in Greymouth in 2001 and in Reefton in 2003. Monthly average concentrations of sulphur dioxide and benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) were measured in Westport, Reefton, Runanga, Greymouth and Hokitika during each of the three winters during the programme, using passive sampling techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Mining and Closure at Reefton Early Gold
    FACT SHEET HISTORY OF MINING AND CLOSURE AT REEFTON Gold was discovered on the West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island in the 1860s. Fortune seekers flocked from around the globe, seeking alluvial gold; tiny grains and nuggets washed down rivers and creeks. In the hills around Reefton there was another form of gold, trapped in the solid rock and buried deep underground in rich veins. Its discovery in 1870 made the district the centre of a gold mining boom. EARLY GOLD Tunnels and shafts drove deep into the rugged hills to reach reefs of gold-bearing quartz ore. Far below the surface, miners attacked the rock with picks and explosives. Above ground, stamper batteries crushed the quartz to release the precious metal. As gold fever grew, so did the town of Reefton. Shares in mining companies were bought and sold amid wild speculation. Many of the small gold mining companies soon collapsed. New mining equipment was introduced in the 1890s. Rock drills and air compressors were introduced, and an aerial tramway was constructed to carry the ore. At Consolidated’s Progress mine a giant battery of 65 stamps was built. By the early 1900s Cornishtown was a thriving township of 300 people supporting the busy Globe Progress underground mine. Eleven levels reaching down over 600 metres were used to mine the narrow quartz reefs. The mine closed in 1926 after producing over 400,000 ounces of gold. While other mines in the area would continue until the middle of the twentieth century, the era of underground gold mining at Globe Progress was over.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand National Climate Summary 2011: a Year of Extremes
    NIWA MEDIA RELEASE: 12 JANUARY 2012 New Zealand national climate summary 2011: A year of extremes The year 2011 will be remembered as one of extremes. Sub-tropical lows during January produced record-breaking rainfalls. The country melted under exceptional heat for the first half of February. Winter arrived extremely late – May was the warmest on record, and June was the 3 rd -warmest experienced. In contrast, two significant snowfall events in late July and mid-August affected large areas of the country. A polar blast during 24-26 July delivered a bitterly cold air mass over the country. Snowfall was heavy and to low levels over Canterbury, the Kaikoura Ranges, the Richmond, Tararua and Rimutaka Ranges, the Central Plateau, and around Mt Egmont. Brief dustings of snow were also reported in the ranges of Motueka and Northland. In mid-August, a second polar outbreak brought heavy snow to unusually low levels across eastern and alpine areas of the South Island, as well as to suburban Wellington. Snow also fell across the lower North Island, with flurries in unusual locations further north, such as Auckland and Northland. Numerous August (as well as all-time) low temperature records were broken between 14 – 17 August. And torrential rain caused a State of Emergency to be declared in Nelson on 14 December, following record- breaking rainfall, widespread flooding and land slips. Annual mean sea level pressures were much higher than usual well to the east of the North Island in 2011, producing more northeasterly winds than usual over northern and central New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Review West Coast Regional Coastal
    Review of West Coast Region Coastal Hazard Areas Prepared for West Coast Regional Council June 2012 Authors/Contributors: Richard Measures Helen Rouse For any information regarding this report please contact: Helen Rouse Resource Management Consultant +64-3-343 8037 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd 10 Kyle Street Riccarton Christchurch 8011 PO Box 8602, Riccarton Christchurch 8440 New Zealand Phone +64-3-348 8987 Fax +64-3-348 5548 NIWA Client Report No: CHC2012-081 Report date: June 2012 NIWA Project: ELF12226 © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • Come Join Us in “New Zealand's Happiest Place”*
    THE BULLER GUIDE TO LIVING WELL Come join us in “New Zealand’s Happiest Place”* * The Happiness of New Zealand Report – UMR Research 2012 Top 10 reasons why people move here • Easy lifestyle and quality of life • We’re kid-safe and family focused • A strong sense of community and caring • So much to see and do right on your doorstep • World-renowned scenery • Get a great house on an average wage • Getting to work, school or play takes just minutes • An unbeatable range of sport and recreation • Great retail, support services and cafes • Great transport links to main centres Click on our interactive menu and links throughout to go directly to the section you would like to see. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 great Housing, Perfect Place Education & Sports, Health and Culture, Relocation reasons Living for the Active Community Recreation, Wellbeing The Arts, Support Intro Essentials Retiree Learning Entertainment Heritage & Useful & Climate contacts SPACE & freedom The Buller district covers Reefton just less than 8600 square – gateway to the Buller from the Lewis Pass route from kilometers with 84% in Christchurch - born from gold in the 1860’s and now a conservation land and National modern goldmining town with a wonderfully preserved Park. All of this wonderful play heritage main street. Entry way to the magnificent Victoria Conservation Park. area for a population of around 10,000 people! Westport Choose your town – – our biggest little town of around 5,500 with all mod cons. The service centre for the Buller sited at the mouth or go country of the Buller River.
    [Show full text]