Trends and Factors in Chaparral Landscape Conversion Alexandra D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trends and Factors in Chaparral Landscape Conversion Alexandra D Trends and Factors in Chaparral Landscape Conversion Alexandra D. Syphard Conservation Biology Institute Actually…. not that 1889 not exactly ^ ^ ^ ^ Southern CA ….it just seems like another world Southern California in 1889 North Hollywood - small town named Toluca, then Lankershim Southern California in 1889 Santa Ana Orange County was formed, splitting off from Los Angeles - Orange County Archives Southern California in 1889 Burbank 1889 Cahuenga Pass (Hollywood Freeway) in 1897. Courtesy of USC Digital Library - California Historical Society Collection. Lots of open space (i.e., chaparral!) for hiking or wandering… …and all the other ecosystem services! September 24,1889 Santiago Canyon Fire Sheepherders camp Simultaneous Santa Ana 125 000 ha, 4 days Losses: Sheep, grain, crops, timber 0 fatalities, homes Image: Los Padres National Forest Keeley and Zedler 2009 114 years later… to 2003 Southern California in 2003 North Hollywood now a neighborhood in LA metropolis Southern California in 2003 Orange County – 3rd most populous Some open areas left Many exotic herbaceous October 25, 2003 Cedar Fire 110 000 ha Simultaneous Santa Ana > 2000 homes 24 fatalities $120 mil firefighting $3 bil damage Image: David Hume Kennedy What Happened?! Landscape Change in SoCal . Drivers and consequences . Population & urban growth . Fire and exotic grasses . Projecting future change on plant population persistence . Management considerations Southern California . Poster child for population growth “One is repeatedly conscious that this was the ‘land of the big boom’” – Lantis et al. 1963 Los Angeles Metropolitan Area ~ 18.5 million Lots of With Population Comes^ Housing 600000 Housing in South Coast 500000 AreaLowDen 400000 AreaHighDen Hectares 300000 200000 100000 Non-metropolitan counties only 0 Exurban - larger footprint Direct Effect of Land Use Conversion . Habitat loss and fragmentation . 30% intact chaparral . Only ~10% coastal sage scrub, 1% native grasslands remain . Most T&E species in continental US Rate animal species extinctions in CA 60 Regression Equation: 50 y = 57.6942/(1e (- +(x - 1954.9934)/23.4023)) 40 30 20 10 0 Number Number animal species 1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000 Date -M.F. Allen, U.C. Riverside Indirect Effect: The Role of Fire . Natural ecosystem process . Chaparral - dense, continuous canopy . Six months drought & Santa Ana winds . Large, high-intensity crown part of natural fire regime . Humans cause > 95% Fires More Frequent, Extensive 1960 1999 Proximity to humans; But nonlinear Fire return interval departure – Current vs. presettlement frequencies (Safford and Van de Water 2014) Syphard et al. 2007, 2009 Ten Largest Fires in CA History 100 yrs 10 yrs 2013 Rim Tuolumne August 256,000 Drought May Exacerbate Keeley & Zedler 2009 Anomalously long, severe drought Generates flammable dead fuels Facilitates long-distance spot fires w/ winds Climate change (?) Human Consequences of Fire . Before ‘the big boom’ - plenty of fire; no losses 1940-1950 Human Consequences . Today: Southern CA loses more homes than any place in US 2000 – 2010: >5K homes, >100 killed/injured, $billions Q: What does fire safety for humans have to do with chaparral ecosystem services?!! A: A lot, but first… Ecological Consequences of Fire Post-fire recovery of chaparral Obligate seeders Obligate resprouters Facultative seeders Species adapted to fire regime Resilient only to periodic wildfire 30 – 200 + years Sensitive to short intervals < ~ 5 -15 yrs Need time to recover & establish seed bank Vegetation Type Conversion . Extirpation opens canopy & allows invasion . Annual grass -> more fire -> positive feedback . May also reduce resprouters (Haidinger & Keeley) Photos by Anna Jacobsen How Extensive Has It Been? . Europeans introduced grasses & forbs ca. early 1800s . Spread rapidly via disturbances, esp. grazing & burning Recent discussion . “No evidence for extensive conversion” (Meng et al. 2014; PLoS ONE) . Remote sensing index of plant cover ~ 25 years, paired plots . Possibly different disturbance history, slope, etc. (Only) 50% sites w/ (some to a lot of) reduction after repeat But what does this really mean? . Let’s think about it How Extensive Has It Been? . Substantial grass in the 1930s . Expansion apparent, despite potential uncertainty Does Fire Play a Role? Strong trend: outweigh map uncertainty? How Fast is Type Conversion? . (Only) 50% sites w/ (some to a lot of) reduction after repeat . This is consistent w/ gradual, cumulative process . Esp. considering potential uncertainty of approach Photo: R. Halsey SD County 2012 Map . Extensive verification . Chap – CSS – grass? Gradual opening 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Mean Fire Fire Frequency Mean 0.0 The Important Question: How Extensive Could It Be? . Recent large fires across huge portions of landscape . Potentially exacerbated with drought, development Keeley et al. Why Do We Care? Chaparral top-ranked habitat, CA rare plants (Keeley 2005) Critical habitat for fauna Loss of watershed function & increased erosion Increased ignition potential – risk to humans Carbon storage: chaparral > grass Photo: R. Halsey Landscape Conversion - Interactions Climate (??) Air pollution Policy Etc. House loss Grass-fire cycle Direct habitat loss Indirect habitat loss Native shrublands Interactions in the Future: Plant Species Persistence Under Climate Change in the Context of Multiple Threats Alexandra D. Syphard Helen M. Regan Janet Franklin Work from 2008 – 2014 Synthesis of results and papers: Franklin et al. 2014 Environmental Conservation Modeling Framework . Rare & endemic plants, including chaparral . Multiple threats: climate change, urban growth, fire, invasive species . SDMs + Urban Growth Model + Climate + Stochastic population model . Relative impacts and management options? . Different vulnerabilities in PFTs? Obligate Seeder: C . verrucosus . Habitat loss -> population decline . Fire worse than habitat loss – ALL OS species . Repeat fire also reduced resprouting oak . Simulated management for habitat – no effect if high FF Conclusions for Chaparral • Need to consider climate relative to other threats • Frequent fire – single greatest threat to OS • Managing for habitat loss only effective if fire controlled • Fire management might also benefit resprouters Q: What does fire safety for humans have to do with chaparral ecosystem services?!! A: Management is done for human safety, but could also benefit chaparral Q: How? The Great Pacific Fire Break ? Traditional Fire Management . Fire suppression & fuel reduction . Increased investment, treatments more extensive . Residential losses getting worse . Ecological impacts & corridors for more grass The Role of Fuel Breaks in Southern CA National Forests Do not passively stop wind-driven fires But play a role as safe access for firefighters Strategic locations, near communities • Syphard, Keeley, and Brennan • Forest Ecology and Management 2011 • International Journal of Wildland Fire 2011 Photo: RW Halsey Window Panes 0.8 Safety: Unburned 0.6 U and M Start at the house Destroyed 0.4 Move out from there 0.2 Proportion of Proportion Strutures 0 Dual Single Roof Material Exterior Construction Material 0.7 0.6 0.5 Unburned 0.6 Unburned 0.4 U and M 0.5 U and M 0.3 Destroyed Destroyed 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0 0.2 Proportion of Proportion Structures Proportion of Proportion structures 0.1 0 Masonry Metal Other Stucco Wood Defensible Space . Thin vegetation immediately adjacent to house . More than 30 m (100 ft) – no extra protection . Low housing density most significant predictor More than 30m – unnecessary Syphard, Brennan & Keeley 2014 ecological impacts Housing Arrangement & Location ! Unburned ! Burned Most likely to burn: -Low-intermediate density -Small, isolated cluster -Close to edge of cluster -Steep slope -Fewer roads Syphard et al. 2011 PLoS ONE Land Use Decision-Making . Can’t change existing, but would planning for future actually reduce risk? And conserve biodiversity? . Land planning through zoning . Policies advocating different growth patterns . Directly regulate where houses are placed . Land acquisition for biodiversity protection . New housing restricted, must go elsewhere . Different priorities, e.g., most area versus biodiversity / fire risk Planning Simulations via Zoning . Projected fire risk to homes . Habitat area and fragmentation (same rank as risk) 0.050 Current 0.045 Infill Infill Expand 0.040 Leapfrog 0.035 0.030 0.025 Expansion risk landscape Mean Existing 0.020 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Syphard et al. PLoS ONE 2013 Leapfrog Land Purchase for Conservation . Different strategies affect fire risk and biodiversity . Purchased in high fire hazard – lowest fire risk and habitat loss Purchase of high hazard Forces infill near the coast Butsic et al. in prep Ignition Prevention . Different causes – different spatial and temporal patterns . Influence size and impact of fire Syphard and Keeley 2015 IJWF San Diego County Santa Monica Mountains Future Conversion? “If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.” Lao Tzu ? ? Concluding Thoughts . Land use - primary driver of conversion (1889 to now) . Direct loss & fragmentation – primary cause of extinctions . Indirect effects . Human ignitions alter frequency, pattern of fire . Exotic species (esp annual grass) compete & replace . Complex (coupled natural-human) system of interactions and feedbacks . Need to increase our understanding, esp. given climate, etc. Fire may be single greatest threat some species (OS) . Adaptation to climate
Recommended publications
  • Original Signed By. Kris Cook
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46(REV 08/17) Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. FY 2019-20 4260 Health Care Services Budget Request Name Program Subprogram 4260-402-BCP-2019-MR 3960 3960050 Budget Request Description SUD Emerging Epidemics, Disaster Response and Licensing Workload Budget Request Summary The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Substance Use Disorder Compliance Division (SUDCD), requests 7.0 permanent positions and expenditure authority of $1,060,000 (100% Residential and Outpatient Program Licensing Fund (ROPLF)), in fiscal year (FY) 2019-20, to address the increased workload of responding to: 1) natural disasters and other State Emergencies; 2) the opioid epidemic; 3) the resurgence of methamphetamine abuse; and 4) the rise in number of treatment facilities. In addition, DHCS requests a one-time expense of $100,000 from General Fund (GF) to migrate DHCS's disaster collection and reporting process into the web-based reporting platform, NC4 through an interagency agreement with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed • Yes • No Does this BCP contain information technology (IT) Department QIC Date components? • Yes El No If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign. For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document (FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date. Project No. Project Approval Document: Approval Date: If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? • Yes • No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Publication Brief on Above Paper
    Western Ecological Research Center Publication Brief for Resource Managers Release: Contact: Phone: Email and web page: January 2009 Dr. Jon E. Keeley 559-565-3170 [email protected] http://www.werc.usgs.gov/seki/keeley.asp Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station, USGS Western Ecological Research Center, 47050 Generals Highway #4, Three Rivers, CA 93271 Causes of Large Shrubland Wildfires Large and damaging wildfires are a major concern to Management Implications: the growing population in southern California. Some • Large, high-intensity wildfires are a natural fea- scientists contend that the historical fire regime was ture of southern California landscapes and are not characterized by frequent, small to moderate size, directly the result of past fire suppression activities. slow-moving smoldering fires and it has been disrupted • Large fires over 25,000 acres have not increased in by fire suppression activities, resulting in unnatural frequency over the past 125 years of record. fuel accumulation and unusually large and catastrophic • Baja California is sometimes proposed as a model wildfires. This is of critical management concern be- for southern California fire regimes if fire suppres- cause these advocates contend that large, high-intensity sion were abandoned, but this is discounted on numerous grounds. • Anomalously long droughts have been unusually frequent in the latter half of the 20th century and a major factor behind an unusual number of mega- fires in recent years. • Fuel treatments designed to maintain young age classes of shrublands will not provide reliable bar- riers to fire spread; however, strategic placement may benefit fire suppression activities. • Increasing community responsibility in locating and constructing new homes and more attention to fire prevention are likely to be avenues for the greatest decreases in community vulnerability to wildfires.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfpa Newsletter 09.2009
    CFPA Newsletter / September 09 Dedicated to Vern. We miss you. This month : - Tribute to Vern Schindele - New OV-10’s by Boeing ? - Fire Terminology / FTA - Who said... - Radio and fire traffic pattern - Santa Ana winds - F7F Tigercat A Guardian from Above Thursday, September 01, 2005 By Lori Stuenkel/Gilroy Dispatch Staff Writer Hollister - Airtanker pilot Vern Schindele paused while reading his newspaper and perked up to hear the dispatcher's voice broadcast through the station. Half a minute later, he sat in the cockpit of his Grumman Aerospace S-2T. In less than three minutes, he was on the runway, turbine engines roaring, awaiting the official call for air support. Not bad for a 72-year-old who's been a licensed pilot for more than half a century. With 35 years on the job as an airtanker pilot with the California Department of Forestry, Schindele is enjoying his 21st season at the Hollister Air Attack Base. Piloting during California's fire season is a 6-day-a-week, 9-hour-a-day job, and Schindele must be ready to answer as many as seven calls in one day. A trip to Oakland to drop some of his 1,200-gallon load of fire retardant on a brush fire takes about 12 minutes. A trip to Morgan Hill or Gilroy, where Schindele helped fight the Croy Fire two years ago, is only a few minutes long. Schindele enjoys flying his 30,000-pound, 258-mile-per-hour airtanker - No. 80 - because "it keeps (me) busy," he said. Although he calls Montana home for most of the year, he plans to keep coming back to Hollister from June through October.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts and Presenter Biographical Information Oral Presentations
    ABSTRACTS AND PRESENTER BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ORAL PRESENTATIONS Abstracts for oral presentations and biographical information for presenters are listed alphabetically below by presenting author’s last name. Abstracts and biographical information appear unmodified, as submitted by the corresponding authors. Day, time, and room number of presentation are also provided. Abatzoglou, John John Abatzoglou, Assistant Professor of Geography, University of Idaho. Research interests span the weather-climate continuum and both basic and applied scientific questions on past, present and future climate dynamics as well as their influence on wildfire, ecology and agriculture and is a key player in the development of integrated climate scenarios for the Pacific Northwest, US. Oral presentation, Wednesday, 2:30 PM, B114 Will climate change increase the occurrence of megafires in the western United States? The largest wildfires in the western United States account for a substantial portion of annual area burned and are associated with numerous direct and indirect geophysical impacts in addition to commandeering suppression resources and national attention. While substantial prior work has been devoted to understand the influence of climate, and weather on annual area burned, there has been limited effort to identify factors that enable and drive the very largest wildfires, or megafires. We hypothesize that antecedent climate and shorter-term biophysically relevant meteorological variables play an essen- tial role in favoring or deterring historical megafire occurrence identified using the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Atlas from 1984-2010. Antecedent climatic factors such as drought and winter and spring temperature were found to vary markedly across geographic areas, whereas regional commonality of prolonged extremely low fuel moisture and high fire danger prior to and immediately following megafire discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation
    Report on the Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation Report on the Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation August 2013 Prepared by: Chi Ho Sham, Mary Ellen Tuccillo, and Jaime Rooke The Cadmus Group, Inc. 100 5th Ave., Suite 100 Waltham, MA 02451 Jointly Sponsored by: Water Research Foundation 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO 80235-3098 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. Published by: [Insert WaterRF logo] DISCLAIMER This study was jointly funded by the Water Research Foundation (Foundation) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The Foundation and USEPA assume no responsibility for the content of the research study reported in this publication or for the opinions or statements of fact expressed in the report. The mention of trade names for commercial products does not represent or imply the approval or endorsement of either the Foundation or USEPA. This report is presented solely for informational purposes Copyright © 2013 by Water Research Foundation ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or otherwise utilized without permission. ISBN [inserted by the Foundation] Printed in the U.S.A. CONTENTS DISCLAIMER.............................................................................................................................. iv CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-First Century California, USA, Wildfires: Fuel-Dominated Vs. Wind- Dominated Fires Jon E
    Keeley and Syphard Fire Ecology (2019) 15:24 Fire Ecology https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0041-0 FORUM Open Access Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind- dominated fires Jon E. Keeley1,2* and Alexandra D. Syphard3 Abstract Since the beginning of the twenty-first century California, USA, has experienced a substantial increase in the frequency of large wildfires, often with extreme impacts on people and property. Due to the size of the state, it is not surprising that the factors driving these changes differ across this region. Although there are always multiple factors driving wildfire behavior, we believe a helpful model for understanding fires in the state is to frame the discussion in terms of bottom-up vs. top-down controls on fire behavior; that is, fires that are clearly dominated by anomalously high fuel loads from those dominated by extreme wind events. Of course, this distinction is somewhat artificial in that all fires are controlled by multiple factors involving fuels, winds, and topography. However, we believe that fires clearly recognizable as fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated provide interesting case studies of factors behind these two extremes. These two types of fires differ greatly in their (1) geographical distribution in the state, (2) past fire history, (3) prominent sources of ignition, (4) seasonal timing, (5) resources most at risk, and (6) requirement for different management responses. Keywords: fire prevention, fire suppression, fuel loads, house protection, land planning, North Winds, population growth, Santa Ana Winds, silvicultural practices Resumen Desde comienzos del siglo veinte, California, EEUU, ha experimentado un incremento substancial en la frecuencia de grandes incendios, frecuentemente con grandes impactos en la gente y en las propiedades.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Large Wildfires in Southern California? Refuting the Fire Suppression Paradigm
    5 Why Large Wildfires in Southern California? Refuting the Fire Suppression Paradigm Richard W. Halsey California Chaparral Institute Dylan Tweed California Chaparral Institute Abstract This paper examines the common belief that past fire suppression and “unnatural” fuel build-up are responsible for large, high-intensity fires in southern California. This has been characterized as the fire suppression paradigm or the southern/Baja California fire mosaic hypothesis. While the belief is frequently repeated by the popular media and has been cited in land/fire management documents, support in the scientific community for the hypothesis has been generally restricted to the original author (Minnich 1983) and his students. A significant number of scientists have raised serious questions about the hypothesis. These scientists offer substantial scientific evidence that the fire mosaic hypothesis should be rejected and that fire suppression has not had a significant impact on fire size, intensity, or frequency in shrubland- dominated wildland fires in southern California. The management implications of this research are important because past fire suppression impacts have been used to justify fuel treatment projects on federal, state, and private lands for the purposes of fire risk reduction and the enhancement of wildlife habitat. Keywords: mosaic, fire suppression, chaparral, southern California shrublands, Baja California, wildfire. Introduction Science reliably overturns our intuitions about how the natural world works. Although it is possible for intuitions to be correct, intuition alone is not sufficient evidence that a testable claim is true. If this were not the case, we would still accept the intuition that the sun revolves around the earth or that the earth itself is flat.
    [Show full text]
  • When I Think of Wildfires, I Think Of…
    When I think of wildfires, I think of… . Santa Ana Winds The Santa Ana winds are strong, extremely dry offshore winds that affect coastal Southern California and northern Baja California in autumn and winter. They can range from hot to cold, depending on the prevailing temperatures in the source regions, the Great Basin and upper Mojave Desert. The winds are known for the hot dry weather (often the hottest of the year) that they bring in the fall, and are infamous for fanning regional wildfires. Meteorology The National Weather Service defines Santa Ana winds as "Strong down slope winds that blow through the mountain passes in southern California. These winds, which can easily exceed 40 mph, are warm and dry and can severely exacerbate brush or forest fires, especially under drought conditions." It is often said that the air is heated and dried as it passes through the Mojave and Sonoran deserts, but according to meteorologists this is a popular misconception. The Santa Ana winds usually form during autumn and early spring when the surface air in the elevated regions of the Great Basin and Mojave Desert (the "high desert") becomes cool or even cold, although they may form at virtually any time of year. The air heats up from adiabatic heating during its descent. While the air has already been dried by orographic lift before reaching the Great Basin as well as by subsidence from the upper atmosphere, the relative humidity of the air is further decreased as it descends from the high desert toward the coast, often falling below 10 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010
    HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2010 Page intended to be blank. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. Executive Summary -1 Organization of the Plan ............................................................................ Executive Summary -1 Development of the Plan .......................................................................... Executive Summary -1 Mission Statement .................................................................................... Executive Summary -2 Goals of the Plan ....................................................................................... Executive Summary -2 Organization of the Action Items .............................................................. Executive Summary -3 Plan Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation ................................... Executive Summary -4 Plan Adoption ............................................................................................ Executive Summary -4 Coordinating Body ..................................................................................... Executive Summary -5 Convener ................................................................................................... Executive Summary -5 Implementation through Existing Programs ............................................. Executive Summary -5 Economic Analysis of Mitigation Projects ................................................. Executive Summary -5 Formal Review Process .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law
    The George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law ® Articles Elias Kohn, Mitigating PG&E’s Wildfire Ignitions: A Framework for Environmental Resilience and Economic Stimulus Dr. Waseem Ahmad Qureshi, International Law and the Threat of Water Wars Notes Molly E. Behan, The Fade of Efficient Cap and Trade: Bankruptcy’s Undermining of the Renewable Fuel Standard and Other Cap-and-Trade Programs Michael Billotti, Risky Business: Implementing Meaningful, Quantified Climate Change Risk Disclosures Audrey Carroll, The Other Side of the (Bit)Coin: Solutions for the United States to Mitigate the Energy Consumption of Cryptocurrency Volume 12 No. 1 Emily N. Donahoe, Rising Seas and Rising Tensions: Encouraging Managed Retreat Strategies During the Calm Between Storms Jeremy A. Freiman, Not All Water Is Good for a Reactor Core: Why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Should Embrace the Science of Climate Change in Plant Siting and Renewal Licensing Matthew Obeid, Charting a Sustainable Path Forward for California Investor-Owned Utilities Subject to Wildfire Liabilities The George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law BOARD OF EDITORS VOLUME 12 Helen Mitsuko Marsh Editor-in-Chief Rebecca A. Ringler Jeremy A. Freiman Dina N. Truncali Senior Articles Editor Senior Managing Editor Senior Production Editor Molly C. Jones Michael F. Billotti Molly E. Behan Senior Projects Editor Sarah A. Husk Senior Notes Editor Danni L. Shanel Laura Martin Managing Editors Tessa Andrew EBA Brief Liaison Violet N.D. Edelman Alan Neuhauser Lesley Morton Andrew F. Costello Devin Patrick O’Connell Sean O’Neill Austin Ray Kabbaz Szabo Notes Editors Tim Scanlan Articles Editors EBA Brief Editors ASSOCIATES Alexander Beyrent Guoyao Han Matthew Obeid Audrey Carroll Hayley F.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Update Page Chapman University Media Relations
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Chapman Press Releases 2003-2011 Chapman Press 10-22-2007 Fire Update Page Chapman University Media Relations Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/press_releases Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Recommended Citation Chapman University Media Relations, "Fire Update Page" (2007). Chapman Press Releases 2003-2011. Paper 222. http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/press_releases/222 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Chapman Press at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapman Press Releases 2003-2011 by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fire Update Page ORANGE, Calif., Oct. 29, 2007 -- The Santiago fire burns on, to the far south and east of Chapman in the hill and canyon country. Smoke in the air eased over the weekend. If you are a student and have been affected by the fires, your professors will help in any way that they can in assisting you to make up any work missed. Students are also urged to call Chapman's Psychological Counseling office at 714-997-6778 if they need to talk to a counselor. Chapman faculty and staff members affected by the fires are urged to let their supervisors know so that work accommodations can be made. Here are some thoughts from Chapman's Psychological Counseling Services on how to reduce anxiety if you have been affected by the wildfires: HELPING YOURSELF AND OTHERS DURING THE CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE CRISIS: * Reduce the input: High levels of anxiety made worse by watching TV, listening to the radio, and reading news can be lowered by limiting your exposure to the sights and sounds of the disaster.
    [Show full text]