Inquiry Starts at the Arkenstall Centre in Haddenham on 9Th October

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inquiry Starts at the Arkenstall Centre in Haddenham on 9Th October Issue 2 Merehamnewsletter Inquiry starts at the Arkenstall Centre in Haddenham on 9th October The fight against Mereham continues The last three weeks have seen intensive work in the continued fight against the Mereham development. A team of planning officers and legal experts have been putting together the case against the development to concentrate on the areas which they believe will defeat the appeal. East Cambridgeshire District Council is going to focus on four main areas. 1) Mereham is simply not Looking towards Haddenham from the River Great Ouse necessary. The District is on target to reach its’ allocation 2) Mereham would bring an simply result in local roads of new homes as part of estimated 12,000 people to being clogged with additional the Local Development the district and an additional traffic with no outlet onto major Framework, the forward plan 14,500 vehicles to our roads. routes or a dedicated transport for East Cambridgeshire. Over The Developer has failed system such as the train or 8,600 homes are already to show that the proposed guided bus. planned for the district by infrastructure improvements 2021 which meets growth rate are realistic and adequate 3) The location of Mereham requirements set by Central to cope with the increased is entirely unsuitable for a Government. The 5,000 numbers of people and traffic development on the A10 new homes at Mereham are generated as a result of the corridor. The aim of new large therefore not needed. development. Their plans will scale developments should East Cambridgeshire District Council 2 be that they are close to as it is also known, is the These main arguments the centres of employment document that all authorities in together with more detailed areas, have good transport the region must work towards points will form the basis of links and are sustainable. for the future. Nowhere in this the Council’s fight against Mereham meets none of plan is there reference to a the Mereham development. these criteria and far from need for a new development Numerous businesses, improving the economy of East on this scale in East organisations and individuals Cambridgeshire, it will blight it. Cambridgeshire; Mereham is support the arguments put therefore unnecessary and forward by the Council and 4) The East of England Plan contrary to wider plans for the will attend the Inquiry to make or Regional Spatial Strategy development of the region. their views clear. How will Mereham affect your drive to work? Driving to Cambridge on the This is due to Twenty Pence Road is going inadequate to be a whole new congested transport experience if the proposed provision Mereham development wins made by the its appeal. developers of Mereham to The latest figures reveal that develop the on an average weekday, over road network 5,500 cars use the B1049 to take into between Wilburton and account the proposed at potential hazard locations’ Cottenham – this quadruples increase in traffic which 5,000 which would drive more to over 24,000 as vehicles new homes would create. vehicles onto the heavily pass through Histon and congested A10. Impington. Even the stretch of Mereham’s own website says: road between Haddenham and ”The conclusion of the traffic Councillor Bill Hunt, District Wilburton carries 9,400 cars modelling is that only the and County Councillor for every working day. Multiplex Stretham Roundabout shows Stretham and Haddenham, Stannifer have made only minor any additional congestion said: “I estimate that if provisions in their planning as a direct result of the Mereham went ahead, it application for improvements or development of Mereham would take at least ten years changes to the Twenty Pence and this is not significant. to complete. That could be Road, one of which is signage All junctions analysed will ten years of hell for local at the Wilburton junction to still experience a degree of residents. Just imagine how direct Cambridge traffic onto congestion after Mereham has many eight-wheel lorries the A10!. been completed, but delays bringing gravel from Block in general will be kept at or Fen Mepal would have to Whether it is a route to below the levels which would come through Witcham Toll, work, a shopping trip or a be experienced if the new Haddenham and Wilburton. I short cut to the A14, many community did not go ahead. “ estimate that traffic levels for residents of Fenland and East HGVs bringing aggregates Cambridgeshire will find their The website goes onto through the villages could hit journeys will become subject suggest potential ‘traffic at least ten per hour.” to heavier and increasingly calming measures along the slow and jammed traffic. B1049 Twenty Pence Road 3 Join the fight! Developers • Sign the Downing Street Petition by following the link from submit new www.haddenham.org.uk • Register your objections to the proposal by writing to the following: evidence 1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: with weeks Hazel Blears MP, Jubilee House, 51 The Crescent Salford, M5 4WX to go 2) The Planning Inspectorate, Room 4/04 Kite, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Multiplex have submitted Bristol, BS1 6PN over 300 pages of extra 3) Editor, The Ely Standard, 38 Market Street information on their Ely, Cambs, CB7 4LS proposals with only one 4) The Barton Willmore Planning Partnership month to go before the 1 High Street, Chesterton, Cambs, CB4 1WB Inquiry. (Multiplex Stannifer Agents) • Sign the petition in post offices at Wilburton, Stretham, The extra evidence has only Haddenham or on the Ely Market stall on Saturday just been made public and September 22nd and 29th means that the District and • Register your wish to speak at the Inquiry by emailing County Council will have to Lynette Duncan at [email protected] examine the new documents or by calling her on 01403 217 799 in the remaining days before • Download, print and display a Say NO to Mereham poster at the 9th October. www.eastcambs.gov.uk/mereham • Buy and display a Say NO to Mereham sign by calling Julie Councillor Phillip Parr on 01353 741 380 Read, Chairman of the • Collect and display a car sticker from the Ely Standard office Planning Committee at at 38 Market Street, Ely East Cambridgeshire • Volunteer your services to help with the various District Council, said: “It demonstrations or take on campaign tasks by contacting is unbelievable that the Julie Parr on 01353 741 380 developer should submit so much evidence with so little time to go before the Inquiry Together we will win begins in October. There are over 300 pages of detailed information which officers and lawyers are now having Tell Gordon Brown what to work through. you think of Mereham “This is simply not good enough. Whether the The Haddenham ‘Say no to Mereham’ group have registered developer thinks this will put an online petition on Number 10 Downing Street’s website in the them at an advantage I don’t fight against Mereham. Click on www.haddenham.org.uk and know but everyone fighting follow the links to register your support for the fight against the the Mereham development development. will make sure they are ready to go come the 9th Members of the Public can also contact their Parish Councils who October.” should be able to supply them with ‘Say No to Mereham’ signs. 4 Your guide to appearing at the Inquiry Appearing at a Planning addresses areas that are seeing if there are others who Inquiry can be a daunting relevant to the decision and will be sharing your argument. experience for anyone whether that the Inspector can take into they are an experienced account. It should cover the If this is the case you should lawyer or a local campaigner. impact the development will discuss your planned The most important thing is to make on your lifestyle, home arguments to see if one get your message across in or business. It is important that person speaking would be the best way possible. your argument is not lost in more effective. Make sure that emotion – that will not win the whoever does the speaking To do this you should first case against Mereham – cold makes it clear that they are register your intention to hard facts will. representing a number of speak with the Programme people – the more people the Officer for the Mereham The Inspector will not want to better! Inquiry at: lynetteduncan@ hear a repetition of arguments personaassociates.co.uk. but will be looking for different The key thing to remember is Once this is done you will be reasons from people as to why that you are entitled to have given a time slot during the Mereham should not be built. your say. Be clear, concise and Inquiry which is expected to Ideally, this means speaking informative and try to remain last six weeks. to people you know are also factual rather than emotional. It is important that the giving evidence or talking to argument you present your local Parish Council and Contacts East Cambridgeshire District Council: Telephone number: 01353 665555 Giles Hughes, Head of Planning and Economic Development: [email protected] Councillor Philip Read - Sutton ward - 01353 778603 Councillor Bill Hunt - Stretham ward - 01353 663732 Councillor John Seaman MBE - Stretham ward - 01353 740477 Councillor Ian Allen - Haddenham - 01353 664993 Councillor Gareth Wilson - Haddenham - 01353 740617 Councillor Pauline Wilson - Haddenham - 01353 740617 Cambridgeshire County Council: Telephone number: 0845 045 5200 Mark Vigor, Head of Strategic Planning: [email protected] Planning Inspectorate: The Customer Support Line on 0117 372 6372 To gain your right to speak at the inquiry, email the Programme Officer who has been appointed for this inquiry, Lynette Duncan at Persona Associates at: [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • Agenda Item No. 14 Title: North Ely Draft Supplementary Planning Document
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 TITLE: NORTH ELY DRAFT SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT Committee: Development & Transport Committee Date: 14th January 2014 Author: Shirley Blake, Principal Sustainable Development Officer [N190] 1.0 ISSUE 1.1 To consider the responses to the public consultation on the draft North Ely Supplementary Planning Document and approve amendments to the document. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION 2.1 Members are recommended to: i) approve the proposed amendments to the Draft North Ely Supplementary Planning Document as set out in Appendix 2, and ii) approve the Draft North Ely Supplementary Planning Document for use as a material consideration in the assessment of appropriate planning applications. 3.0 BACKGROUND 3.1 The submission draft of the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan proposes an allocation for an urban extension of approximately 3,000 houses to the North of Ely. This is a part of its wider long term vision for the future development of the City over the next 20 years. 3.2 The draft North Ely Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) has been developed by the District Council to provide further supporting detail to help guide the development of the urban extension. It builds on the ideas set out in the North Ely Development Framework 2011, and the developers Joint Strategic Masterplan July 2013, prepared following a series of workshops with the developers, District Council officers and key stakeholders such as the County Council and Environment Agency. 3.3 The aim of the SPD is to provide a clear policy guidance to ensure that a quality development is delivered in North Ely, together with the best possible outcomes for the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 August 2008 Mr Matthew Chard Barton Willmore Director Of
    28 August 2008 Mr Matthew Chard Our Ref: APP/V0510/A/06/2014221; Barton Willmore APP/W0530/A/06/2014216; Director of landscape planning and design APP/Q0505/X/07/2045815 7 Soho Square LONDON W1D 3QB TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT – SECTIONS 78 AND 195 APPEALS BY STANNIFER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED PROPOSED MEREHAM SETTLEMENT AND ASSOCIATED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE A10 AND THE JANE COSTON BRIDGE APPLICATION REFS: 05/01116/OUM; S/1926/05/F; AND 06/1291/CL2PD 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (“the Secretary of State”) to say that consideration has been given to the report by Richard Ogier BA MRTPI who, assisted by William Wadrup BEng(Hons) CEng MICE FIHT, held a public inquiry between 9 October 2007 and 6 March 2008 into your client’s appeals: (a) under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (“the 1990 Act”) against the decision by East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) to refuse planning permission for a new settlement comprising up to around 5,000 homes; up to around 8,000m² retail and related uses (including a foodstore of around 2,500m², comparison retail of around 4,000m² and A2/A3/A4/A5 of around 1,500m²); up to around 45,000m² employment uses (B1, B2 and B8); supporting leisure, community and education uses; and infrastructure including highway works to the A10 (“Mereham”) – Application Ref 05/01116/OUM (Appeal A); (b) under Section 78 of the 1990 Act against the refusal by South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) to refuse planning permission for highway improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Reach
    Out of Reach Welcome to the ancient kingdom of Reach, Cambridgeshire, England BEFORE The ancient Township of REACH, or RECHE, has been inhabited for 2,000 years. Local legend says that it was once a city boasting seven churches! Situated at the termination of the great earthwork known as the Devil's Dyke, with Reach Lode giving direct access to the sea, it survived the Conquest as an inland port. It was the centre of considerable trade in mediaeval times, being granted a charter to hold AFTER an annual fair at Rogationtide by King John. Later, as the activity on its hythes decreased and its maritime importance declined, Reach, with its great fair dwin- dling to the proportions of a village `feast' and its many inns closing one by one, gradually lapsed into a purely agricultural community. Reche the port has gone, only Reach the hamlet remains. Reach Community Magazine Dec07/Jan08 Printed by The College Printers, City of Ely Community College Church Services Information Services at Burwell and Reach Parish Council Chairman Michael Aves 742800 Parish Clerk Claire Denniss 604405 Village Hall Committee Ross Clark St Etheldreda & the Village Hall Bookings Joyce Harrison, 742405 St Mary’s Burwell Jan 08 Holy Trinity Reach County Councillor Hazel Williams District Councillor Allen Alderson 01638 741744 Neighbourhood Watch Joyce Harrison 742405 6th 8.00am Holy Communion Vicar Revd Canon Stephen Earl 741262 Hon.Assistant Priest Revd David Bush 741839 Epiphany ( said) Asst.Curate Revd Gill Smith 743589 Licensed Lay Minister John Hooper 742026 9.30am Family Service Priest in Retirement (Reach) Revd David King 742924 th 8.00am Holy Communion (said) 13 9.30am Parish Communion Editor Grahame Radford.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA ITEM NO 4 MEETING of the ELY MASTERPLAN/GROWTH DELIVERY WORKING PARTY Notes of a Meeting Held In
    AGENDA ITEM NO 4 MEETING OF THE ELY MASTERPLAN/GROWTH DELIVERY WORKING PARTY EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE Notes of a meeting held in the Council Chamber, DISTRICT COUNCIL The Grange, Nutholt Lane, Ely on Thursday 15 June 2009 at 7.30pm PRESENT Councillor Peter Moakes (Chairman) Councillor Brian Ashton, Co-opted Member, City of Ely Council Councillor Sheila Friend-Smith Councillor Bill Hunt – Co-opted Member, Cambridgeshire County Council Councillor Mike Rouse OFFICERS Shirley Blake – Principal Sustainable Development Officer Ann Caffall – Infrastructure and Project Officer Giles Hughes – Head of Planning and Sustainable Development Melanie Stimpson – Democratic Services Officer ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Councillor Ian Allen Councillor Anna Bailey (entered the meeting at minute no. 8, during the presentation by ATKINS) Councillor Tony Cornell Councillor Tony Goodge Councillor Tony Parramint Councillor Jackie Petts Councillor Gareth Wilson Michael Addyman, ATKINS Caroline Cannon, ATKINS James Lindsay, ATKINS Jeremy Smith, Transport Strategy Manager, Cambridgeshire County Council 9 members of the public attended the meeting. 1. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN Councillor Peter Moakes was proposed and duly seconded. There being no other nominations Agenda Item 4 – page 1 Ely Masterplan/Notes - 15 June 2009.doc It was resolved: That Councillor Peter Moakes be elected as Chairman of the Ely Masterplan/Growth Delivery Working Party for the ensuing Municipal year. 2. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME One question was submitted by Mrs Gillian Tuberfield, as follows: ‘When and where was this meeting, with its invitation to the public to attend notified and publicised? I was only notified of the meeting by a telephone call from Shirley Blake’s assistant at 5.15pm on Friday 12 June 2009 (I had written to Shirley Blake on 24 March, 2 June and 10 June and have missed another meeting to be present this evening).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Region Bedfordshire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2007 Evaluations Version 4.1 Eastern Region Bedfordshire Bedford (C.09.882) TL04534914 AIP database ID: {B4354DB3-9A21-49F5-A2AB-013FC42FCB5A} Parish: Cauldwell Ward Postal Code: MK41 0QY LAND AT THE FORMER BRITANNIA IRONWORKS, KEMPSTON ROAD Land at the Former Britannia Ironworks, Kempston Road, Bedford. Archaeological Field Evaluation Smith, M Bedford : Albion Archaeology, 2007, 32pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology An archaeological evaluation revealed part of a medieval building, a small quantity of pre- modern human remains and modern structural remains associated with the Brittania Ironworks. The medieval remains were suggested to be part of the medieval monastic complex of Cauldwell Priory. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, MIA, IA OASIS ID :albionar1-32244 (C.09.883) TL1031748476 AIP database ID: {505F3D11-EEA7-4CA4-A4CD-5A8934272E26} Parish: Cople Postal Code: MK44 3UJ ALL SAINTS CHURCH, COPLE All Saints Church, Cople, Bedfordshire. Archaeological Investigation, Recording, Analysis and Publication Ingham, D Bedford : Albion Archaeology, 2007, 20pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology Excavation of trenches revealed the remains of a medieval cemetery and a large medieval pit immediately to the north of the church. The graves were all aligned east-west. The ground level in the churchyard had been raised by up to 0.85m. For this reason, an undisturbed natural grave was only discovered in the footing trenches, and
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Haddenham ‘Say No to Mereham’ Group Update
    PRESS RELEASE Haddenham `Say No to Mereham' Group Update Date: 10th September 2007 03 Since its establishment the Haddenham `Say No to Mereham' Group has been active in supporting opposition to the planned development of 5,500 houses (long term plan up to 7,500 houses) at the Mereham site between Wilburton and Stretham on the A10. The following actions are being taken and we would like to encourage as many people as possible to support us. The Developers, Australian company Multiplex Stannifer, have huge resources available to them to fight for planning to be granted - all we have are our voices and (very limited) time, plus whatever donations we can obtain from the local community. Petition: 34th Haddenham Steam Rally (8th-9th September) A great effort was made by members of the `Say No to Mereham' Group this weekend at the Haddenham Steam Rally. Demonstrating the cross-party nature of this campaign, County Councillor William Hunt (Conservative) and District Councillor Gareth Wilson (Liberal Democrat) worked together with other volunteers to tell visitors to the Steam Rally about the threat of the Mereham development. Locals and people from further afield queued to sign the petition and over 1,000 signatures were collected. A similar exercise is planned on Ely Market 22nd and 29th September and we need volunteers to man the stand and attract the attention of passers-by. Paper copies of the `Say No to Mereham' petition have been circulated to shops and other businesses in Haddenham, Wilburton, Witchford and other surrounding villages. The petition has now been set up on the `10 Downing Street' website.
    [Show full text]