DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission Data 2015 Semantic Web

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Submission Data 2015 Semantic Web Stephen Cranefield 1 Journal Details Request Type: Add Rank Title: Semantic Web Acronym: SW Publisher Name: IOS Press For1: 0804 For2: For3: ISSN Print Version: 1570-0844 ISSN Electronic Version: 2210-4968 Requested rank: A 2 Journal Data Journal Webpage URL: http://www.iospress.nl/journal/semantic-web/ Issues/year: 5 Papers in each issue: 6,8,5,4,4,5 Papers/year: 27 Pages in each paper: 16,16,31,15,25,24,19,21,15 Table of contents URL: http://content.iospress.com/journals/semantic-web/5/6 Table of contents URL: http://content.iospress.com/journals/semantic-web/5/5 Page Format: double Example paper URL: http://content.iospress.com/download/semantic-web/ sw120?id=semantic-web%2Fsw120 DBLP journal record URL: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/semweb/index.html 3 Editorial Board 3.1 Editorial Board Board Listing URL: http://www.iospress.nl/journal/semantic-web/?tab= editorial-board Board Members with h-indices: Harith Alani, 34 Claudia dAmato, 18 Sren Auer, 35 Lora Aroyo, 26 1 Boyan Brodaric, No GS Philipp Cimiano, 46 Oscar Corcho, 36 Isabel Cruz, 31 Philippe Cudre-Mauroux, 23 Bernardo Cuenca-Grau, 33 Michel Dumontier, 26 Jerome Euzenat, 43 Mark Gahegan, 36 Aldo Gangemi, 43 Frank van Harmelen, 62 Rinke Hoekstra, 18 Aidan Hogan, 22 Andreas Hotho, 44 Eero Hyvnen, No GS Werner Kuhn, 36 Freddy Lecue, 17 Jens Lehmann, 33 3.2 Editors In Chief Name: Pascal Hitzler Affiliation: Wright State University h-index: 40 Google Scholar URL: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EkwfQcMAAAAJ DBLP URL: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/pers/hd/h/Hitzler:Pascal Name: Krzysztof Janowicz Affiliation: University of California Santa Barbara h-index: 27 Google Scholar URL: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user= 6B2Z9vAAAAAJ&hl=en DBLP URL: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/pers/hd/j/Janowicz:Krzysztof 4 Impact Factors and External Ranks 4.1 Web of Science No data 4.2 Scopus Subcategory name: Computer Networks and Communications SJR Quartile: Q1 h-index: 15 Citable Docs (3 years): 62 Total Docs (3 years): 69 Cites/doc: 3.180 Rank ordered by h-index: 130 2 4.3 Google Scholar Sub-category URL: https://scholar.google.com.au/citations?view_op=top_ venues&hl=en&vq=eng_databasesinformationsystems Position in sub-category: 20+ h5-index of 20th item in subcat- 32 egory: h5-index of this journal: 29 Link to above journal: None h5-index of above journal: None Link to below journal: None h5-index of below journal: None 4.4 Microsoft No data 4.5 Arnetminer Category: All (not in any subcategory) Rank: 315 h5-index: 25 Journals above: None 5 Where Others Publish 5.1 Report File: http://portal.core.edu.au/core/media/journal_request_ report/CORE_Ranking_1_9dCbA7H.txt List of people with h-indices: David Karger, 82 Jim Hendler, 80 Jinhyung Kim, 70 Katia Sycara, 82 Ian Horrocks, 85 Deborah L. McGuinness, 62 Amit Sheth, 88 Tim Finin, 85 Yang Yang, 57 Ora Lassila, 32 Frank van Harmelen, 62 Talapady N Bhat, 36 Peter F. Patel-Schneider, 57 Steffen Staab, 77 Natalya Fridman Noy, 50 Cong Wang, 53 Nigel Shadbolt, 58 Carole A. Goble, 67 3 Anupam Joshi, 70 Dongjoo Lee, 55 Source of expert list: gscholar Subcategory/Keyword: Semantic web 6 Comparator Journals International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 7 Other Information 7.1 Proposers First name: Stephen Last name: Cranefield Affiliation: University of Otago Email: [email protected] 7.2 Additional Notes ** Notes about the data entered ** This journal was started in December 2010 and is not yet in JCR. However, the journal web site says: "Now accepted for coverage in Thomson Reports' Journal Citation Reports & Science Citation Index Ex- panded. Impact Factor expected summer 2016." It is also not included in Microsoft Academic Search. It is listed by Arnetminer, but I couldn't find it in any subcategory. Therefore the rank I have given is for "All" journals. The first comparator journal (IJSWIS) has an immediacy index of 0.000. The form displays this as 0E-10. IJSWIS could not be found in Google Scholar Citations. ** Comparator journals ** There are only two A-ranked journals in the ERA 2010 list for FoR 0804, and only one of these is relevant to the semantic web field (the other is a database journal). Thus I have chosen one B journal and one A journal as comparator journals. I believe the Semantic Web ranks between the two, and I think it has grown in strength since its start in 2010 to reach A status. The A journal (IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering) had its first issue in 1989 (compared to Dec. 2010 for Semantic Web) and has 222 papers a year (compared to 27 for Semantic Web), which makes the journals' h indices incomparable. However, despite its much lower publication rate (less than 1/15 the number of papers per year), Semantic Web's SCImago h5 index of 29 comes close to IEEE TKDE's 32. The B journal (IJSWIS) has a lower SJR quartile (Q2) than Semantic Web (Q1) in the category of Computer Networks and Communications, and a lower number of cites/doc (1.93 vs. 3.18). However it has a higher Scopus h index (23 vs. 15). On the other hand, Semantic Web has a higher h5 index in Arnetminer than IJSWIS (25 vs. 9) - IJSWIS shows up under Database and Data Mining, but not under "All". There were no other metrics for which data was available for both journals. ** Other evidence of quality ** From http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/blog/semantic-web-journal-ranked-among-top-2-web-topic : "The Semantic Web journal is listed on Google Scholar's Top 20 publications matching Web [ https: //scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&view_op=search_venues&vq=Web ] . The page lists both jour- nals and conferences, and the Semantic Web journal is ranked 6th according to the h5-index, and ranked 4 2nd if only journals are considered. It is ranked 4th according to the h5-median [57], and ranked 1st if only journals are considered. We are particularly proud about this result because the data includes papers from 2010, and our first issue actually appeared in December 2010, i.e. effectively we had a year less to accumulate citations." Semantic Web's 2014 SCImago rankings based on the SJR metric are as follows: Quartile 1 and 11th rank for category Computer Networks and Communications [ higher than ERA2010 A-rated journals IEEE Intelligent Systems (13th), Future Generation Computer Systems (20th) ] Quartile 1 and 23rd rank for category Computer Science Applications [ higher than ERA2010 A*-rated journals Computational Linguistics (27th) and Journal of Management Information Systems (30th) ] Quartile 1 and 20th rank for category Information Systems [ higher than ERA2010 A*-ranked journals Decision Support Systems (21st), VLDB Journal (22nd) and Information Systems (29th)] It was ranked 68th amongst all Computer Science journals by SJR in 2014 - ahead of Decision Support Systems (69) and VLDB Journal (72), and the other journals listed above. It was 33rd by SJR for Computer Science journals in 2013. 5.
Recommended publications
  • VIVO: a Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery

    VIVO: a Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery

    VIVO A Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery Synthesis Lectures on Semantic Web: Theory and Technology Editors James Hendler, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Ying Ding, Indiana University Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Application is edited by James Hendler of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Whether you call it the Semantic Web, Linked Data, or Web 3.0, a new generation of Web technologies is offering major advances in the evolution of the World Wide Web. As the first generation of this technology transitions out of the laboratory, new research is exploring how the growing Web of Data will change our world. While topics such as ontology-building and logics remain vital, new areas such as the use of semantics in Web search, the linking and use of open data on the Web, and future applications that will be supported by these technologies are becoming important research areas in their own right. Whether they be scientists, engineers or practitioners, Web users increasingly need to understand not just the new technologies of the Semantic Web, but to understand the principles by which those technologies work, and the best practices for assembling systems that integrate the different languages, resources, and functionalities that will be important in keeping the Web the rapidly expanding, and constantly changing, information space that has changed our lives. Topics to be included: • Semantic Web Principles from linked-data to ontology design • Key Semantic Web technologies and algorithms • Semantic Search
  • Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain Guest Editors’ Editorial: the Next Step

    Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain Guest Editors’ Editorial: the Next Step

    Special Issue on the Semantic Web for the Legal Domain Guest Editors’ Editorial: The Next Step Pompeu Casanovasa,b, Monica Palmiranic, Silvio Peronid,*, Tom van Engerse, Fabio Vitalif a [email protected] Institute of Law and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain b [email protected] Law and Policy Program: Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre, Law School, Deakin University 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia c [email protected] CIRSFID, University of Bologna, via Galliera, 3, 40121 Bologna (BO), Italy d [email protected] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy e [email protected] Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam, Vendelstraat 8, 1012 XX Amsterdam, The Netherlands f [email protected] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy Abstract. Ontology-driven systems with reasoning capabilities in the legal field are now better understood. Legal concepts are not discrete, but make up a dynamic continuum between common sense terms, specific technical use, and professional knowledge, in an evolving institutional reality. Thus, the tension between a plural understanding of regulations and a more general understanding of law is bringing into view a new landscape in which general legal frameworks—grounded in well-known legal theories stemming from 20th-century c. legal positivism or sociological jurisprudence—are made compatible with specific forms of rights management on the Web. In this sense, Semantic Web tools are not only being designed for information retrieval, classification, clustering, and knowledge management.
  • JOURNAL of WEB SEMANTICS Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web

    JOURNAL of WEB SEMANTICS Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web

    JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.2 • Abstracting and Indexing p.2 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.5 ISSN: 1570-8268 DESCRIPTION . The Journal of Web Semantics is an interdisciplinary journal based on research and applications of various subject areas that contribute to the development of a knowledge-intensive and intelligent service Web. These areas include: knowledge technologies, ontology, agents, databases and the semantic grid, obviously disciplines like information retrieval, language technology, human- computer interaction and knowledge discovery are of major relevance as well. All aspects of the Semantic Web development are covered. The publication of large-scale experiments and their analysis is also encouraged to clearly illustrate scenarios and methods that introduce semantics into existing Web interfaces, contents and services. The journal emphasizes the publication of papers that combine theories, methods and experiments from different subject areas in order to deliver innovative semantic methods and applications. The Journal of Web Semantics addresses various prominent application areas including: e-business, e-community, knowledge management, e-learning, digital libraries and e-sciences. The Journal of Web Semantics features a multi-purpose web site, which can be found at: http://www.semanticwebjournal.org/. Readers are also encouraged to visit the Journal of Web Semantics blog, at http://journalofwebsemantics.blogspot.com/
  • International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

    International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

    International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems January-March 2015, Vol. 11, No. 1 Table of Contents RESEARCH ARTICLES 1 Template Based Semantic Integration: From Legacy Archaeological Datasets to Linked Data Ceri Binding, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK Michael Charno, Archaeology Data Service, York, UK Stuart Jeffrey, Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow, UK Keith May, Historic England, Portsmouth, UK Douglas Tudhope, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK 30 PatchR: A Framework for Linked Data Change Requests Magnus Knuth, Hasso Plattner Institute for Software Systems Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany Harald Sack, Hasso Plattner Institute for Software Systems Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 46 Complex Role Inclusions with Role Chains on the Right are Expressible in SROIQ Michael Compton, CSIRO, Cygnet, Australia Copyright The International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) (ISSN 1552-6283; eISSN 1552-6291), Copyright © 2015 IGI Global. All rights, including translation into other languages reserved by the publisher. No part of this journal may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher, except for noncommercial, educational use including classroom teaching purposes. Product or company names used in this journal are for identifi cation purposes only. Inclusion of the names of the products or companies does not indicate a claim of ownership by IGI Global of the trademark or registered trademark. The
  • Semantic Web: Who Is Who in the Field – a Bibliometric Analysis

    Semantic Web: Who Is Who in the Field – a Bibliometric Analysis

    Accepted for Publication By the Journal of Information Science: http://jis.sagepub.co.uk Semantic Web: Who is who in the field – A bibliometric analysis Ying Ding1 School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA Abstract The Semantic Web is one of the main efforts aiming to enhance human and machine interaction by representing data in an understandable way for machines to mediate data and services. It is a fast-moving and multidisciplinary field. This study conducts a thorough bibliometric analysis of the field by collecting data from Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus for the period of 1960-2009. It utilizes a total of 44,157 papers with 651,673 citations from Scopus, and 22,951 papers with 571,911 citations from WOS. Based on these papers and citations, it evaluates the research performance of the Semantic Web (SW) by identifying the most productive players, major scholarly communication media, highly cited authors, influential papers and emerging stars. Keywords: citation analysis, semantic web, research evaluation, impact analysis 1. Introduction The Web is experiencing tremendous changes in its function to connect information, people and knowledge, but also facing severe challenges to integrate data and facilitate knowledge discovery. The Semantic Web is one of the main efforts aiming to enhance human and machine interaction by representing data in an understandable way for machine to mediate data and services [1]. Recently, PriceWaterhouseCoopers [2] has predicted that Semantic Web technologies may revolutionize the entire enterprise of decision-making and information sharing. The profile of the Semantic Web has been further heightened by the Obama administration’s new groundbreaking plan to initiate Semantic Web technologies to bring transparency to government activities [3].